Meeting minutes
process
<spectranaut> https://
spectranaut: talked about different ways of handling 2 branches
spectranaut: also about whether PRs should be open for a long time
spectranaut: decided that wanted a single branch so the editors draft and WD would be the same thing
spectranaut: 1 branch which will help with merge conflicts. all non-normative merged as soon as appropriate. Normative changes will need merge conflicts to be fixed.
spectranaut: made PR templates on all the main repos which we can review in a minute
spectranaut: everyone comfortable with that change for now
<murmurs of agreement>
spectranaut: to go back to previous topic.... how to prioritize new issues
will keep with milestones for now
spectranaut: think of them as year based
spectranaut: still using milestones
jcraig: on board with close 1.3 with no new feaatures
discussion on versioning which scribe missed
mking: have a question about earlier discussion.... was thinking of aria-actions. I can imagine us doing the work in practices and in aria on the spec.... in expermintental spaces. Could do it all next year. then the idea we would wait for a spec to be final is what I want to be reversed. woiuld like everything to be end to end implemented before it goes to CR
scotto: sounds like the process in html-aam i have been doing for a while
<Zakim> jcraig, you wanted to mention in theory, role and label can have WPT or WebDriver tests