Talk:Q191: Difference between revisions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Suwa (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Bouzinac (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Complex constraint
| label = Estonia is used as nationality for people dead before 1991-01-01
| description = Items with {{P|27}} equal to {{Q|191}} and {{P|570}} before 1991-01-01
| sparql = SELECT DISTINCT ?item WHERE {
?item wdt:P27 wd:Q159 .
?item p:P570/psv:P570 ?node .
?node wikibase:timeValue ?born .
?node wikibase:timePrecision ?precision .
FILTER (?born < "1941-01-01T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime)
FILTER (?born < "1991-01-01T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime)
FILTER (?precision >= "9"^^xsd:integer)
}
}}
== Population ==
== Population ==
Change population to 1 May 2015 data. -[[User:Mardus|Mardus]] ([[User talk:Mardus|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Change population to 1 May 2015 data. -[[User:Mardus|Mardus]] ([[User talk:Mardus|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:16, 18 November 2020

Estonia is used as nationality for people dead before 1991-01-01
Items with country of citizenship (P27) equal to Estonia (Q191) and date of death (P570) before 1991-01-01 (Help)
Violations query: SELECT DISTINCT ?item WHERE { ?item wdt:P27 wd:Q159 . ?item p:P570/psv:P570 ?node . ?node wikibase:timeValue ?born . ?node wikibase:timePrecision ?precision . FILTER (?born < "1941-01-01T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime) FILTER (?born < "1991-01-01T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime) FILTER (?precision >= "9"^^xsd:integer) }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/Q191#Estonia is used as nationality for people dead before 1991-01-01

Population

Change population to 1 May 2015 data. -Mardus (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia entries

To be added: https://rm.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonia Benriac (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent problematic changes

Without any discussion or reading even the French Wikipedia article, one guy decided to turn the pre-occupation Estonian Republic into a separate legal entity. French Wikipedia: "Partie intégrante de l'Empire de Russie mais conservant une minorité dominante germano-balte, le pays accède à l'indépendance lors de la révolution russe de 1917. Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale (1939-1945), l'Estonie a été contestée et occupée à plusieurs reprises par l'Union soviétique et l'Allemagne. L'Estonie indépendante sera finalement incorporée à l'Union soviétique en juin 1940, conformément au pacte germano-soviétique d'août 1939. Après la perte de son indépendance de facto, les représentants diplomatiques et le gouvernement en exil ont préservé la continuité de jure d'Estonie. En 1987, la révolution chantante pacifique contre la domination soviétique a abouti à la restauration de l'indépendance de facto le 20 août 1991." (My bold.) The whole reestablishment of Estonian independence was based on the concept of legal continuality (unlike in France, which might be confusing our Lone Ranger), according to which there is just one Republic of Estonia based on the 1920 treaty between Estonia and Soviet Russia; this interpretation has been accepted by most countries, except Russia, and the difference between two interpretations has quite concrete difference in results (citizenship, territorial claims, etc). Hence, such changes are very much a political issue, in addition to a practical issue (e.g., no one in Estonia would normally have the idea to start marking two separate citizenships for people who were citizens of Estonia both before and after the Soviet occupation, so this is legal reinterpretation is going to create a major mess in Wikidata). Unfortunately, I don't have neither time nor energy to discuss the international law here in length, so I'm just indicating a potential problem. --Ehitaja (talk) 11:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have read it, don't worry. I am aware there has been Estonian restoration of Independence (Q16631950). So what? Wikidata is not a juridical database ; there happen to be two separate wikidata items, even if Estonia has juridically been considered as starting in 1918, and even if Estonia 1918 == Estonia 1991. These two Wikidata items cover different topics and different time frame, with different inception (P571)and dissolved, abolished or demolished date (P576). Feel free to add a said to be the same as (P460) to Estonia (Q191) and Interwar Estonia (Q2174038). Bouzinac💬✒️💛 12:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a problem of including several inception dates, depending on the POV. --- Jura 12:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OKay but someone, perhaps another lone ranger... decided to revert my edits without discussing... Cheers. Bouzinac💬✒️💛 22:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I won't dispute the exquisite logic of "there is a separate item for a historical period, so it must have been a separate state, too". Besides, it is a very efficient way for producing exclamation marks stating that, e.g., all citizens of Estonia before 1991 must be reclassified and nobody could be a citizen of Estonian 1940-1991 (as these two items now won't cover that period). There are items describing, e.g., the exile government which now have no state to be connected to, etc etc. But I'm happy to leave sorting out all that mess for someone else. --Ehitaja (talk) 12:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But in fact these are different entities. They have separate governements, different people, and (but I should check) some difference in territory. --Infovarius (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you are focusing about nationality : Wikidata is not a juridical database nor it is a reference to help get and print a passport. Wikidata is not obliged to follow Estonian laws. However I can understand it's a sensitive issue inside Estonia, what I don't understand is why it is sensitive here on Wikidata : it's a purely computer database. Whilst my grand parents were born in French Third Republic (Q70802), they are of France (Q142) nationality, it's a simple fact. Did you mean that anyone born and deceased inside Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic (Q130280) was automatically considered Estonia (Q191)? For instance that guy Ülo Kiple (Q16403221) whilst Estonia (Q191) did absolutely not exist. Anyway, if you wish to absolutely state Estonia 1918 == Estonia 1991, then you should remove historical country (Q3024240) and sovereign state (Q3624078) from Interwar Estonia (Q2174038), as, according per your own sole logic, there should be only one Estonia state. Bouzinac💬✒️💛 15:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Was French Third Republic (Q70802) an independent state or a historical period of France (Q142)? How to distinguish? --Infovarius (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Depends on point of view. By the times of Léon Blum (Q18434), Neville Chamberlain (Q10664), etc, it was an independent state with a specific form of government (Q1307214), state territory (Q28692710). So if you want to query any states existing in 1930, French Third Republic (Q70802) is more legitime to appear than France (Q142). Another example is Alsace–Lorraine (Q155144) not being French Third Republic (Q70802) from 1871 to 1919. Anyway, no one is stunned by the Ülo Kiple (Q16403221) problem ?
Another thought : should'nt we use items like Estonians (Q1147273) instead of countries to help type inside country of citizenship (P27)? Bouzinac💬✒️💛 17:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BTW at Q96#P571 we tried to structure various possible dates. --- Jura 11:16, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suwa (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]