The document is an application for interim anticipatory bail filed in the Court of Dist & Sessions Judge, Thane by Mr. Dyanand Udhav Raibole against the State of Maharashtra through Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane for offenses under Sections 380, 454, 457 of IPC. The applicant argues that interim anticipatory bail should be granted during the pendency of the hearing to avoid arrest which would frustrate the purpose of filing for anticipatory bail.
The document is an application for interim anticipatory bail filed in the Court of Dist & Sessions Judge, Thane by Mr. Dyanand Udhav Raibole against the State of Maharashtra through Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane for offenses under Sections 380, 454, 457 of IPC. The applicant argues that interim anticipatory bail should be granted during the pendency of the hearing to avoid arrest which would frustrate the purpose of filing for anticipatory bail.
The document is an application for interim anticipatory bail filed in the Court of Dist & Sessions Judge, Thane by Mr. Dyanand Udhav Raibole against the State of Maharashtra through Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane for offenses under Sections 380, 454, 457 of IPC. The applicant argues that interim anticipatory bail should be granted during the pendency of the hearing to avoid arrest which would frustrate the purpose of filing for anticipatory bail.
The document is an application for interim anticipatory bail filed in the Court of Dist & Sessions Judge, Thane by Mr. Dyanand Udhav Raibole against the State of Maharashtra through Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane for offenses under Sections 380, 454, 457 of IPC. The applicant argues that interim anticipatory bail should be granted during the pendency of the hearing to avoid arrest which would frustrate the purpose of filing for anticipatory bail.
1. That, the applicant prefer an application u/s. 438 of Cr. P.C.
today, in thare Hon’ble Court, for seeking direction.
2. That, the application of the applicant is based on strong legal
grounds of merits and that, he hope to succeed in the same on merit, However pending hearing and final disposal of this application may takes time. If the applicants is arrested during
the pendency, the very purpose of filing an application for
anticipatory bail will be frustrated. 2
3. That, in the circumstances, it is just necessary and in the interest
of justice to grant interim anticipatory bail in favour of applicant during the pendency.
4. That, the applicant adopt the contents and grounds stated in an
application u/s. 438 of Cr.P.C. for the purpose of this application.
5. That, an affidavit in support of this application is filed herewith.
6. That, it is therefore prayed that, your Honour may be pleased to
grant interim anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant in terms of prayer of main application, u/s. 438 of Cr. P.C.