[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (875)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = wildfire modelling

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 8852 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Forest Fire Severity for a Management Conceptual Model: Case Study in Vilcabamba, Ecuador
by Fernando González, Fernando Morante-Carballo, Aníbal González, Lady Bravo-Montero, César Benavidez-Silva and Fantina Tedim
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2210; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122210 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 318
Abstract
Wildfires are affecting natural ecosystems worldwide, causing economic and human losses and exacerbated by climate change. Models of fire severity and fire susceptibility are crucial tools for fire monitoring. This case study analyses a fire event on 3 September 2019 in Vilcabamba parish, [...] Read more.
Wildfires are affecting natural ecosystems worldwide, causing economic and human losses and exacerbated by climate change. Models of fire severity and fire susceptibility are crucial tools for fire monitoring. This case study analyses a fire event on 3 September 2019 in Vilcabamba parish, Loja province, Ecuador. This article aims to assess the severity and susceptibility of a fire through spectral indices and multi-criteria methods for establishing a fire action plan proposal. The methodology comprises the following: (i) the acquisition of Sentinel-2A products for the calculation of spectral indices; (ii) a fire severity model using differentiated indices (dNBR and dNDVI) and a fire susceptibility model using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method; (iii) model validation using Logistic Regression (LR) and Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) algorithms; (iv) the proposal of an action plan for fire management. The Normalised Burn Ratio (NBR) index revealed that 10.98% of the fire perimeter has burned areas with moderate-high severity in post-fire scenes (2019) and decreased to 0.01% for post-fire scenes in 2021. The Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) identified 67.28% of the fire perimeter with null photosynthetic activity in the post-fire scene (2019) and 5.88% in the post-fire scene (2021). The Normalised Difference Moisture Index (NDMI) applied in the pre-fire scene identified that 52.62% has low and dry vegetation (northeast), and 8.27% has high vegetation cover (southwest). The dNDVI identified 10.11% of unburned areas and 7.91% using the dNBR. The fire susceptibility model identified 11.44% of the fire perimeter with null fire susceptibility. These results evidence the vegetation recovery after two years of the fire event. The models demonstrated excellent performance for fire severity models and were a good fit for the AHP model. We used the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and area under the curve (AUC); dNBR and dNDVI have an RMSE of 0.006, and the AHP model has an RMSE of 0.032. The AUC = 1.0 for fire severity models and AUC = 0.6 for fire susceptibility. This study represents a holistic approach by combining Google Earth Engine (GEE), Geographic Information System (GIS), and remote sensing tools for proposing a fire action plan that supports decision making. This study provides escape routes that considered the most significant fire triggers, the AHP, and fire severity approaches for monitoring wildfires in Andean regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Fires Prediction and Detection—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study zone: (<b>a</b>) Representation on a macro-scale (Ecuador); (<b>b</b>) Vilcabamba parish including the delineation of the wildfire perimeter analysed, weather stations, and the wildfires recorded in the year 2019 (pre-fire scene) by the SNGRE and VIIRS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Framework of the wildfire susceptibility analysis using the AHP method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A conceptual model for wildfire management in Vilcabamba parish.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>NBR index in fire perimeter with Sentinel-2A imagery: (<b>a</b>) Pre-fire scene (9 September 2019); (<b>b</b>) Post-fire scene (9 September 2019); and (<b>c</b>) Post-fire scene (4 August 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>NDVI results of fire perimeter: (<b>a</b>) Pre-fire scene (25 August 2019); (<b>b</b>) Post-fire scene (9 September 2019); and (<b>c</b>) Post-fire scene (4 August 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>NDMI results of Vilcabamba parish in pre-fire scene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Wildfire severity models with Sentinel-2A imagery. (<b>a</b>) dNDVI and (<b>b</b>) dNBR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Area Under Curve for the Logistic Regression model: (<b>a</b>) the AUC for the fire severity models and (<b>b</b>) the AUC for the fire susceptibility model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variables for the wildfire susceptibility map: (<b>a</b>) slope angle; (<b>b</b>) elevation; (<b>c</b>) slope aspect; (<b>d</b>) isohyets); (<b>e</b>) isotherms; (<b>f</b>) land use in pre-fire scene; (<b>g</b>) land use in post-fire scene; (<b>h</b>) distance to water bodies (rivers); and (<b>i</b>) distance to roads. Source: Adapted from [<a href="#B60-forests-15-02210" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-forests-15-02210" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B64-forests-15-02210" class="html-bibr">64</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Analysis of fire susceptibility: (<b>a</b>) Wildfire susceptibility map through AHP method. (<b>b</b>) Access to water bodies (lagoons and lakes) by aerial transport for each parcel. (<b>c</b>) Access to rivers and streams by terrestrial transport.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Proposal action plan in Vilcabamba parish where evacuation routes and fire refuge areas are outlined.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 18472 KiB  
Article
Early Wildfire Smoke Detection Method Based on EDA
by Yang Liu, Faying Chen, Changchun Zhang, Yuan Wang and Junguo Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4684; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244684 - 15 Dec 2024
Viewed by 398
Abstract
Early wildfire smoke detection faces challenges such as limited datasets, small target sizes, and interference from smoke-like objects. To address these issues, we propose a novel approach leveraging Efficient Channel and Dilated Convolution Spatial Attention (EDA). Specifically, we develop an experimental dataset, Smoke-Exp, [...] Read more.
Early wildfire smoke detection faces challenges such as limited datasets, small target sizes, and interference from smoke-like objects. To address these issues, we propose a novel approach leveraging Efficient Channel and Dilated Convolution Spatial Attention (EDA). Specifically, we develop an experimental dataset, Smoke-Exp, consisting of 6016 images, including real-world and Cycle-GAN-generated synthetic wildfire smoke images. Additionally, we introduce M-YOLO, an enhanced YOLOv5-based model with a 4× downsampling detection head, and MEDA-YOLO, which incorporates the EDA mechanism to filter irrelevant information and suppress interference. Experimental results on Smoke-Exp demonstrate that M-YOLO achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 96.74%, outperforming YOLOv5 and Faster R-CNN by 1.32% and 3.26%, respectively. MEDA-YOLO further improves performance, achieving an mAP of 97.58%, a 2.16% increase over YOLOv5. These results highlight the potential of the proposed models for precise and real-time early wildfire smoke detection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing and Smart Forestry II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The structure of Cycle-GAN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example images generated by Cycle-GAN: (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) real image; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) generated image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Network structure diagram: (<b>a</b>) YOLOv5; (<b>b</b>) M-YOLO. The improvements are marked in red.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The ECA structure diagram. Different colors represent different channels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of spatial attention mechanism. Different colors represent different channels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the hybrid domain attention mechanism EDA. Different colors represent different channels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>C3-EDA module structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Model metrics in training: (<b>a</b>) mAP@0.5; (<b>b</b>) mAP@0.95; (<b>c</b>) precision; (<b>d</b>) recall. In the legend, MEDA-YOLO-Backbone, MEDA-YOLO-Neck, and MEDA-YOLO-Output are marked as YOLO-Backbone, YOLO-Neck, and YOLO-Output, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of bounding box loss curve: (<b>a</b>) train; (<b>b</b>) validate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of objectness loss curve: (<b>a</b>) train; (<b>b</b>) validate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Detection results of small smoke target: (<b>a</b>) Faster R-CNN; (<b>b</b>) YOLOv5s; (<b>c</b>) YOLOv7; (<b>d</b>) YOLOv8; (<b>e</b>) M-YOLO; (<b>f</b>) MEDA-YOLO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Detection results of smoke-like targets: (<b>a</b>) Faster R-CNN; (<b>b</b>) YOLOv5s; (<b>c</b>) YOLOv7; (<b>d</b>) YOLOv8; (<b>e</b>) M-YOLO; (<b>f</b>) MEDA-YOLO. The red box without the “smoke” label in the figure is the direct output content of the original monitoring image, which is not the target detected by the algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 22589 KiB  
Article
Landslide Prediction Validation in Western North Carolina After Hurricane Helene
by Sophia Lin, Shenen Chen, Ryan A. Rasanen, Qifan Zhao, Vidya Chavan, Wenwu Tang, Navanit Shanmugam, Craig Allan, Nicole Braxtan and John Diemer
Geotechnics 2024, 4(4), 1259-1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics4040064 (registering DOI) - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 172
Abstract
Hurricane Helene triggered 1792 landslides across western North Carolina and has caused damage to 79 bridges to date. Helene hit western North Carolina days after a low-pressure system dropped up to 254 mm of rain in some locations of western North Carolina (e.g., [...] Read more.
Hurricane Helene triggered 1792 landslides across western North Carolina and has caused damage to 79 bridges to date. Helene hit western North Carolina days after a low-pressure system dropped up to 254 mm of rain in some locations of western North Carolina (e.g., Asheville Regional Airport). The already waterlogged region experienced devastation as significant additional rainfall occurred during Helene, where some areas, like Asheville, North Carolina received an additional 356 mm of rain (National Weather Service, 2024). In this study, machine learning (ML)-generated multi-hazard landslide susceptibility maps are compared to the documented landslides from Helene. The landslide models use the North Carolina landslide database, soil survey, rainfall, USGS digital elevation model (DEM), and distance to rivers to create the landslide variables. From the DEM, aspect factors and slope are computed. Because recent research in western North Carolina suggests fault movement is destabilizing slopes, distance to fault was also incorporated as a predictor variable. Finally, soil types were used as a wildfire predictor variable. In total, 4794 landslides were used for model training. Random Forest and logistic regression machine learning algorithms were used to develop the landslide susceptibility map. Furthermore, landslide susceptibility was also examined with and without consideration of wildfires. Ultimately, this study indicates heavy rainfall and debris-laden floodwaters were critical in triggering both landslides and scour, posing a dual threat to bridge stability. Field investigations from Hurricane Helene revealed that bridge damage was concentrated at bridge abutments, with scour and sediment deposition exacerbating structural vulnerability. We evaluated the assumed flooding potential (AFP) of damaged bridges in the study area, finding that bridges with lower AFP values were particularly vulnerable to scour and submersion during flood events. Differentiating between landslide-induced and scour-induced damage is essential for accurately assessing risks to infrastructure. The findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive hazard mapping to guide infrastructure resilience planning in mountainous regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area with location map illustrating North Carolina’s mountain area. (<b>a</b>) North Carolina’s distinct physiographic region distribution, (<b>b</b>) Blue Ridge Mountain area, and (<b>c</b>) hypothetical Appalachian Mountain formation during the Alleghenian orogeny.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Path of Hurricane Helene moving through the Gulf of Mexico and landing near Perry, Florida as a Category 4 storm. Note the mountainous topography of western North Carolina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A composite representation of damaged bridges and landslide locations after Hurricane Helene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Some of the landslide locations after Hurricane Helene. (Photo credit: Shen-En Chen, Sophia Lin, and Qifan Zhao).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A schematic of the calculation workflow for the probability of multi-hazard (wildfire, landslide, earthquake, and flooding) occurrence map, the probability of wildfire occurrence map, and of bridges of average flooding potential (AFP). Note that L+W+E represents landslides, wildfires, and earthquakes, and L+E represents landslides and earthquakes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Multi-hazard (without wildfire effect) risk map of North Carolina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Multi-hazard (with wildfire effect) susceptibility map of North Carolina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Multi-hazard susceptibility map in North Carolina with reported landslide locations: (<b>a</b>) landslide, wildfire, and earthquake; (<b>b</b>) landslide and earthquake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Analysis of reported landslides with the corresponding susceptibility probabilities: (<b>a</b>) multi-hazard scenario L+W+E; (<b>b</b>) multi-hazard scenario L+E; (<b>c</b>) difference between L+W+E and L+E; and (<b>d</b>) bar chart comparing the two scenarios by number of slides. Note that L+W+E represents landslides, wildfires, and earthquakes and L+E represents landslides and earthquakes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Hurricane Helene landslide damage to transportation structures and facilities: (<b>a</b>) by a roadside near Lake Lure; (<b>b</b>) by a parking space near Chimney Rock; (<b>c</b>) near a parking lot in Chimney Rock Village; and (<b>d</b>) below a county highway in Henderson County (Photo credit: Shen-En Chen, Sophia Lin, and Qifan Zhao).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Hurricane Helene landslide damage to bridge structures: (<b>a</b>) Main Street bridge over a railroad, Saluda, NC; (<b>b</b>) bridge near Lake Lure; (<b>c</b>) the Big Hungry Road Bridge, Flat Rock; and (<b>d</b>) dam crossing, Lake Lure. (Photo credit: Shen-En Chen, Sophia Lin, and Qifan Zhao).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Hurricane Helene flood-battered region in Chimney Rock Village, NC: (<b>a</b>) washed away bridge on the Chimney Rock Scenic Road over the Broad River, Chimney Rock Village, NC; (<b>b</b>) view from Main Street looking over Broad River; (<b>c</b>) scoured Broad River valley in front of Burnshirt Vineyards Bistro on Main Street, Chimney Rock Village, NC; and (<b>d</b>) the parking lot in front of Burnshirt Vineyards Bistro on Main Street, Chimney Rock Village, NC. (Photo credit: Shen-En Chen, Sophia Lin, and Qifan Zhao).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Helene landslides and the associated susceptibility values as an accumulated function. Susceptibility values for the following multi-hazard scenarios: L+E (landslide and earthquake) and L+W+E (landslide, wildfire, and earthquake).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Landslides with zero and 99~100% predictions for (<b>a</b>) without wildfire effects and (<b>b</b>) with wildfire effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Conditioning factors used in this study, including reported landslides: (<b>a</b>) Elevation; (<b>b</b>) slope; (<b>c</b>) aspect; (<b>d</b>) soil type; (<b>e</b>) rainfall; (<b>f</b>) temperature; (<b>g</b>) forest cover; (<b>h</b>) distance to rivers; (<b>i</b>) distance to faults; (<b>j</b>) distance to roads; (<b>k</b>) distance to high population density; and (<b>l</b>) probability of wildfire occurrence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Typical bridge scour damage mechanism, including the formation of scour holes (local scour) around bridge piers, which can result in increased stress in the supporting geo-medium (riverbed material): (<b>a</b>) typical scour mechanism; (<b>b</b>) geo-medium stressing due to scour hole formation; (<b>c</b>) scour depths due to clear water scour vs. live-bed scour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Debris slide and scour combined mass waste mechanism of the Big Hungry River: (<b>a</b>) whole view of the Big Hungry Road (County route 1889) landslide, Flat Rock, NC; and (<b>b</b>) closeup of the slide and the river deposits, and (<b>c</b>) landslide assumption by [<a href="#B36-geotechnics-04-00064" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Reconstruction of the Big Hungry Road Bridge: (<b>a</b>) on the Flat Rock side; (<b>b</b>) on the Flat Rock side; (<b>c</b>) on the Flat Rock side, and (<b>d</b>) opposite to Flat Rock.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 23866 KiB  
Article
Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Crest-Fixed Corrugated Steel Claddings Under Wind Uplift Loading at Elevated Temperatures
by Lisa Pieper and Mahen Mahendran
Fire 2024, 7(12), 473; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120473 (registering DOI) - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 298
Abstract
The 2019–2020 Black Summer bushfire in Australia is a good example of the frequent and severe bushfires (wildfires) observed around the world in recent years. Fire-enhanced winds and fire–wind interactions during those bushfire events have caused increased wind velocities in the vicinity of [...] Read more.
The 2019–2020 Black Summer bushfire in Australia is a good example of the frequent and severe bushfires (wildfires) observed around the world in recent years. Fire-enhanced winds and fire–wind interactions during those bushfire events have caused increased wind velocities in the vicinity of a bushfire front. This can lead to a premature failure of the building envelope, making it vulnerable to ember attack and direct flame contact. In Australia, crest-fixed cold-formed steel (CFS) claddings are commonly used for buildings in bushfire-prone areas because of their non-combustibility. Therefore, this study investigated the pull-through failure behaviour of corrugated CFS claddings under wind uplift/suction loading at elevated temperatures, simulating fire-enhanced winds during a bushfire by means of experimental and numerical studies. Experimental results showed a negligible influence of the thermal expansion of the cladding system on the pull-through failure behaviour, while a significant decrease in pull-through capacity was observed with increasing temperatures. Suitable finite element models were developed, validated and used in a detailed numerical parametric study. Based on the findings from these studies, a design equation was proposed for the pull-through capacity of the crest-fixed corrugated claddings at elevated temperatures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Damage to the building envelope caused by fire–wind interaction during the 2009 Black Saturday bushfire [<a href="#B4-fire-07-00473" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pull-through failures of crest-fixed CFS claddings: (<b>a</b>) local plastic dimpling of corrugated cladding and (<b>b</b>) splitting failure of trapezoidal cladding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Overall test set-up and (<b>b</b>) loading system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Screw arrangement and (<b>b</b>) 15 kN load cells attached to the critical screws underneath the cladding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Locations of laser sensors and load cells on the corrugated cladding specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Movable frame and insulation layers between cladding and heating blanket and (<b>b</b>) test set-up for elevated temperature tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Locations of thermocouples on the surface of the corrugated cladding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Validation of the load–deflection curve at ambient temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Load–deflection curves at ambient temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Local dimpling failure at the central support at (<b>a</b>) ambient temperature, (<b>b</b>) 200 °C, (<b>c</b>) 400 °C and (<b>d</b>) localised failure at the critical screw fastener.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Displacement versus temperature curves at 400 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Load versus temperature curves at 200 °C and 400 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Overall applied load-deflection curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Midspan line-loading FE model of corrugated cladding. Note: Different screw labelling compared with the test set-up in <a href="#fire-07-00473-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Boundary conditions and load application of (<b>a</b>) the corrugated FE model, (<b>b</b>) the screw head and washer and (<b>c</b>) at the screw fastener hole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Mesh of the midspan line-load FE model of corrugated cladding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>FE model of corrugated cladding subject to uniform pressure loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Load–deflection curves based on (<b>a</b>) the overall applied load from the line-load FE models and (<b>b</b>) the critical screw fastener load in the line-load FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison of the localised dimpling failure around the critical screw fastener at (<b>a</b>) ambient temperature, (<b>b</b>) 200 °C and (<b>c</b>) 400 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Load–deflection curves of the critical screw in the large-scale FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Stress distribution at the pull-through failure of corrugated cladding at 600 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Influence of Young’s modulus on the pull-through capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Influence of pitch on the pull-through capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Influence of crest height on the pull-through capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Influence of radius on the pull-through capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Influence of span on the pull-through capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Load reduction factors from uniform pressure loading and line-loading FE models and line-load and small-scale tests.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 3395 KiB  
Article
Drone-Based Wildfire Detection with Multi-Sensor Integration
by Akmalbek Abdusalomov, Sabina Umirzakova, Makhkamov Bakhtiyor Shukhratovich, Mukhriddin Mukhiddinov, Azamat Kakhorov, Abror Buriboev and Heung Seok Jeon
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4651; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244651 (registering DOI) - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 348
Abstract
Wildfires pose a severe threat to ecological systems, human life, and infrastructure, making early detection critical for timely intervention. Traditional fire detection systems rely heavily on single-sensor approaches and are often hindered by environmental conditions such as smoke, fog, or nighttime scenarios. This [...] Read more.
Wildfires pose a severe threat to ecological systems, human life, and infrastructure, making early detection critical for timely intervention. Traditional fire detection systems rely heavily on single-sensor approaches and are often hindered by environmental conditions such as smoke, fog, or nighttime scenarios. This paper proposes Adaptive Multi-Sensor Oriented Object Detection with Space–Frequency Selective Convolution (AMSO-SFS), a novel deep learning-based model optimized for drone-based wildfire and smoke detection. AMSO-SFS combines optical, infrared, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data to detect fire and smoke under varied visibility conditions. The model introduces a Space–Frequency Selective Convolution (SFS-Conv) module to enhance the discriminative capacity of features in both spatial and frequency domains. Furthermore, AMSO-SFS utilizes weakly supervised learning and adaptive scale and angle detection to identify fire and smoke regions with minimal labeled data. Extensive experiments show that the proposed model outperforms current state-of-the-art (SoTA) models, achieving robust detection performance while maintaining computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time drone deployment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>This figure illustrates the overall architecture of the AMSO-SFS model, which is designed for drone-based wildfire and smoke detection. The model leverages data from three distinct sensor modalities: IR, and SAR. These inputs are preprocessed and aligned to ensure they represent the same scene before being fed into the multi-sensor fusion module. The multi-sensor fusion module is a critical component of the architecture, where complementary information from the optical, IR, and SAR data are combined.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>This figure demonstrates the design and functionality of the SPU and FPU, key components of the SFS-Conv module. These units work together to enhance feature extraction by capturing complementary spatial and frequency-domain information. The SPU dynamically adjusts its receptive field to capture multi-scale spatial features. It achieves this by employing kernels of varying sizes, which adapt to the scale of the detected objects, such as small ignition points or extensive smoke plumes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>This figure represents the CSU, which is responsible for fusing the spatial and frequency features extracted by the SPU and the FPU. The CSU is responsible for adaptively fusing the spatial and frequency-domain features extracted by the SPU and the FPU, ensuring that only the most informative features are retained for wildfire and smoke detection. The CSU operates by calculating channel-wise attention scores for the spatial and frequency feature maps. These scores are derived using learned weights and a sigmoid activation function, which assigns importance to each feature channel based on its contribution to the detection task.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Shows a FLAME dataset example of wildfire and smoke using three different types of sensors: optical, IR, and SAR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Showcases the robustness of the detection model in identifying fire and smoke under different environmental conditions, including dense smoke, snow, and varying distances. The bounding boxes and confidence scores validate the accuracy of the system in these challenging scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2383 KiB  
Article
An AutoML-Powered Analysis Framework for Forest Fire Forecasting: Adapting to Climate Change Dynamics
by Shuo Zhang and Mengya Pan
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1481; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121481 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 400
Abstract
Wildfires pose a serious threat to ecosystems and human safety, and with the backdrop of global climate change, the prediction of forest fires has become increasingly important. Traditional machine learning methods face challenges in forest fire prediction, such as difficulty identifying feature parameters, [...] Read more.
Wildfires pose a serious threat to ecosystems and human safety, and with the backdrop of global climate change, the prediction of forest fires has become increasingly important. Traditional machine learning methods face challenges in forest fire prediction, such as difficulty identifying feature parameters, manual intervention in model selection, and hyperparameter tuning, which affect prediction accuracy and efficiency. This study proposes an analytical framework for forest fire prediction based on Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) technology to address the challenges traditional machine learning methods face in forest fire prediction. We collected meteorological, topographical, and vegetation data from Guangxi Province, with meteorological data covering 1994 to 2023, providing comprehensive background information for our prediction model. Using the prediction model, which was constructed with the AutoGluon framework, the experimental results indicate that models under the AutoGluon framework (e.g., KNeighborsDist classifier) significantly outperform traditional machine learning models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score, with the highest accuracy rate reaching 0.960. Model error analysis shows that models under the AutoGluon framework perform better in error control. This study provides an efficient and accurate method for forest fire prediction, which is of great significance for decision-making in forest fire management and for protecting forest resources and ecological security. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Ecosystems in a Changing Climate)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Number of forest fires and burned areas in China from 2002 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of Forest fires and burned areas in Guangxi from 2002 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Vegetation type distribution map of Guangxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Climate change in Guangxi Province, 1994–2003.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pearson correlation coefficient of variables in the dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pearson correlation coefficient of variables in the dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Multi-layer overlay integration strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Predicted versus true values for different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of prediction error of the AutoML models.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 738 KiB  
Review
Remote Sensing Technologies Quantify the Contribution of Ambient Air Pollution to Asthma Severity and Risk Factors in Greenness, Air Pollution, and Wildfire Ecological Settings: A Literature Review
by John T. Braggio
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1470; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121470 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 320
Abstract
Numerous epidemiologic studies have used remote sensing to quantify the contribution of greenness, air pollution, and wildfire smoke to asthma and other respiration outcomes. This is the first review paper to evaluate the influence of remote sensing exposures on specific outcome severity and [...] Read more.
Numerous epidemiologic studies have used remote sensing to quantify the contribution of greenness, air pollution, and wildfire smoke to asthma and other respiration outcomes. This is the first review paper to evaluate the influence of remote sensing exposures on specific outcome severity and risk factors in different ecological settings. Literature searches utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar identified 61 unique studies published between 2009 and 2023, with 198 specific outcomes. Respiration-specific outcomes were lower in greenness and higher in air pollution and wildfire ecological settings. Aerosol optical depth (AOD)-PM2.5 readings and specific outcomes were higher in economically developing than in economically developed countries. Prospective studies found prenatal and infant exposure to higher ambient AOD-PM2.5 concentration level readings contributed to higher childhood asthma incidence. Lung function was higher in greenness and lower in the other two ecological settings. Age, environment, gender, other, and total risk factors showed significant differences between health outcomes and ecological settings. Published studies utilized physiologic mechanisms of immune, inflammation, and oxidative stress to describe obtained results. Individual and total physiologic mechanisms differed between ecological settings. Study results were used to develop a descriptive physiologic asthma model and propose updated population-based asthma intervention program guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exposure Assessment of Air Pollution (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Utilization of remote sensing to assess the contribution of live vegetation, ambient air pollution, wildfire smoke, and other attributes to asthma and other respiration-specific outcomes. Refer to these references for additional information: Greenness, Dadvand and associates [<a href="#B59-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">59</a>]; AOD-Air Pollution, land use regression [<a href="#B23-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">23</a>]; Hierarchical Bayesian models [<a href="#B19-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">19</a>], and GEOS-Chem model [<a href="#B31-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B43-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">43</a>]; Wildfire Attributes, AOD-PM<sub>2.5</sub> + smoke [<a href="#B45-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B60-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B62-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">62</a>,<a href="#B63-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">63</a>,<a href="#B64-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">64</a>,<a href="#B65-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">65</a>,<a href="#B66-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">66</a>,<a href="#B67-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">67</a>,<a href="#B68-atmosphere-15-01470" class="html-bibr">68</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The synergistic contribution of ecological setting exposures (top row, from left side to right side, wildfire, air pollution, and greenness, respectively) to lung and physiologic function (middle row), and respiration outcome onset (asthma, bronchitis, cough, and wheeze), as modified by epidemiologic and psychologic risk factors (bottom row, left side and right side, respectively). Abbreviation: remote sensing, RS. Arrow direction represents an aversive (↑) or protective (↓) contribution to the final outcome.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 1979 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the Economic Efficiency of Fuel Reduction Treatments in Sagebrush Ecosystems That Vary in Ecological Resilience and Invasion Resistance
by Thomas A. Bridges-Lyman, Jessi L. Brown, Jeanne C. Chambers, Lisa M. Ellsworth, Matthew C. Reeves, Karen C. Short, Eva K. Strand and Michael H. Taylor
Land 2024, 13(12), 2131; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122131 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 468
Abstract
The concepts of resilience and resistance (R&R) have been used to improve wildland fuel treatment outcomes by identifying parts of the landscape that are more likely to respond well to treatment. This study examined how the economic benefits and costs of fuel treatments [...] Read more.
The concepts of resilience and resistance (R&R) have been used to improve wildland fuel treatment outcomes by identifying parts of the landscape that are more likely to respond well to treatment. This study examined how the economic benefits and costs of fuel treatments in sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems varied with the resilience and resistance properties of the treatment site. Generalized ecological models were developed for the economic analysis of fuel treatments that integrated ecological succession, annual grass invasion, pinyon–juniper expansion, and wildfire to simulate ecosystem dynamics over time. The models incorporated resilience and resistance by varying model parameters related to each plant community’s ability to resist annual grass invasion and recover post-disturbance. Simulations produced estimates of the expected (ex ante) benefit–cost ratio for each treatment. The approach also considered the benefits associated with the system remaining in an ecologically favorable condition, allowing us to report a more holistic measure of the net economic benefits of fuel treatments. The results from the simulations indicated fuel treatment was economically efficient in late-successional sagebrush and early-successional juniper in mountain big sagebrush associations. For sagebrush associations where treatment was economically efficient, higher R&R status sites had higher benefit–cost ratios. The results suggested that treatment costs were more determinative of economic efficiency than treatment benefits. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Generalized treatment response model (GTRM) for mountain big sagebrush with the potential for prescribed fire treatment. Boxes represent model phases and describe vegetation composition; shorthand names for the model phases are given in quotation marks. S1 model phases are perennial dominant; S2 model phases are sagebrush dominant; P1, P2, and P3 model phases correspond to Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III woodland. The first row corresponds to a low invasion condition (0–8% absolute annual cover); the second row corresponds to a moderate to high invasion condition (8–50% absolute annual cover); the last row consists of one box corresponding to an annual grass-dominated state (50+% absolute annual cover). Arrows show pathways between different model phases. Blue arrows indicate ecological succession; purple arrows indicate invasion absent wildfire; dashed green arrows indicate treatment. Yellow, orange, and red arrows from boxes indicate that wildfire could transition the system to model phases in the low invasion condition (S1 Low), mod-high invasion condition (S1 High), and the annual grass-dominated condition (AGD). Model phase descriptions were adapted from state and transition models in Chambers et al. [<a href="#B20-land-13-02131" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. Model parameters could vary with treatment response groups (TRGs), and the parameters for simulations were determined by analysis as described in <a href="#sec2dot4-land-13-02131" class="html-sec">Section 2.4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Generalized treatment response model (GTRM) for black sagebrush and low sagebrush with the potential for cut-and-pile burn treatment. Boxes represent model phases and describe vegetation composition; shorthand names for the model phases are given in quotation marks. S1 model phases are perennial dominant; S2 model phases are sagebrush dominant; P1, P2, and P3 model phases correspond to Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III woodland. The first row corresponds to a low invasion condition (0–8% absolute annual cover); the second row corresponds to a moderate to high invasion condition (8–30% absolute annual cover); the last row consists of one box corresponding to an annual grass-dominated state (30+% absolute annual cover). Arrows show pathways between different model phases. Blue arrows indicate ecological succession; purple arrows indicate invasion absent wildfire; dashed green arrows indicate treatment. Yellow, orange, and red arrows from boxes indicate that wildfire could transition the system to model phases in the low invasion condition (S1 Low), mod-high invasion condition (S1 High), and the annual grass-dominated condition (AGD). Model phase descriptions were adapted from state and transition models in Chambers et al. [<a href="#B20-land-13-02131" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. Model parameters could vary with treatment response groups (TRGs), and the parameters for simulations were determined by analysis as described in <a href="#sec2dot4-land-13-02131" class="html-sec">Section 2.4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Shares of simulation runs in each model phase after 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 years in mountain big sagebrush simulations initialized in the low invasion Phase I woodland model phase (P1 Low) without treatment (<b>top panel</b>) and with treatment (<b>bottom panel</b>). Subpanels compare three treatment response groups (TRGs) for mountain big sagebrush at different time cross-sections, where each TRG corresponds to a combination of resilience (RSL) and resistance (RST) indicators. The four levels of the R&amp;R indicators are low (L), moderate-low (ML), moderate (M), and high and moderate-high (H+MH).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8026 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation Cover Using the NDVI–DFI Model in a Typical Dry–Hot Valley, Southwest China
by Caiyi Fan, Guokun Chen, Ronghua Zhong, Yan Huang, Qiyan Duan and Ying Wang
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2024, 13(12), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13120440 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 561
Abstract
Non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) significantly impacts ecosystem degradation, drought, and wildfire risk due to its flammable and persistent litter. Yet, the accurate estimation of NPV in heterogeneous landscapes, such as dry–hot valleys, has been limited. This study utilized multi-source time-series remote sensing data from [...] Read more.
Non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) significantly impacts ecosystem degradation, drought, and wildfire risk due to its flammable and persistent litter. Yet, the accurate estimation of NPV in heterogeneous landscapes, such as dry–hot valleys, has been limited. This study utilized multi-source time-series remote sensing data from Sentinel-2 and GF-2, along with field surveys, to develop an NDVI-DFI ternary linear mixed model for quantifying NPV coverage (fNPV) in a typical dry–hot valley region in 2023. The results indicated the following: (1) The NDVI-DFI ternary linear mixed model effectively estimates photosynthetic vegetation coverage (fPV) and fNPV, aligning well with the conceptual framework and meeting key assumptions, demonstrating its applicability and reliability. (2) The RGB color composite image derived using the minimum inclusion endmember feature method (MVE) exhibited darker tones, suggesting that MVE tends to overestimate the vegetation fraction when distinguishing vegetation types from bare soil. On the other hand, the pure pixel index (PPI) method showed higher accuracy in estimation due to its higher spectral purity and better recognition of endmembers, making it more suitable for studying dry–hot valley areas. (3) Estimates based on the NDVI-DFI ternary linear mixed model revealed significant seasonal shifts between PV and NPV, especially in valleys and lowlands. From the rainy to the dry season, the proportion of NPV increased from 23.37% to 35.52%, covering an additional 502.96 km². In summary, these findings underscore the substantial seasonal variations in fPV and fNPV, particularly in low-altitude regions along the valley, highlighting the dynamic nature of vegetation in dry–hot environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Maps of the study area showing the (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) geographic location overview, (<b>c</b>) imagery, and (<b>d</b>) DEM and imagery of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Rainfall variations in the study area. (<b>a</b>) The historical monthly accumulated rainfall and the monthly accumulated rainfall in 2023; (<b>b</b>) annual rainfall accumulation from 2004 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maps showing (<b>a</b>) NDVI derived from GF-2 imagery, distribution of (<b>b</b>) validation samples, and (<b>c</b>) field investigation images of typical examples in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The main technical workflow of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial diagram of ternary linear mixed model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Feature space diagrams of the NDVI-DFI ternary linear mixed model in different months. The red, green, and blue circles in the figure show the location of NPV, PV, and BS endmembers in each projection, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A ternary diagram based on the abundance proportions of the three endmembers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>RGB color composite images based on different endmember selection methods for <span class="html-italic">f<sub>PV</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">f<sub>NPV</sub></span>, and <span class="html-italic">f<sub>BS</sub></span>. Blue represents the bare soil fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>BS</sub></span>, green represents the photosynthetic vegetation fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>PV</sub></span>, and red represents the non-photosynthetic vegetation fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>NPV</sub></span>. White areas indicate invalid values, such as masked regions for cities, water bodies, and other excluded areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean–standard deviation histograms for different endmember selection methods across seasons. (<b>a</b>) Results based on the Minimum-Volume Enclosing Endmember (MVE) method; (<b>b</b>) results based on the Pixel Purity Index (PPI) method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison between the estimation results of the NDVI-DFI ternary linear mixed model and the high-resolution GF-2 satellite imagery for typical scenes. Blue represents the bare soil fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>BS</sub></span>, green represents the photosynthetic vegetation fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>PV</sub></span>, and red represents the non-photosynthetic vegetation fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>NPV</sub></span>, orange and purple represent areas with high abundance of the bare soil fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>BS</sub></span> and the non-photosynthetic vegetation fraction <span class="html-italic">f<sub>NPV</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison between the NDVI-DFI ternary linear mixed model estimation results and the GF-2 high-resolution image calculation results. The color gradient represents the density of validation samples, ranging from blue (low density) to red (high density). Regions with a deeper red indicate higher sample density, while regions with a deeper blue indicate sparser sample distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Spatial distribution of <span class="html-italic">f<sub>PV</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">f<sub>NPV</sub></span> estimated based on Sentinel-2A images in Xinping in 2023. (<b>a</b>) Seasonal spatial distribution of <span class="html-italic">f<sub>PV</sub></span>; (<b>b</b>) seasonal spatial distribution of <span class="html-italic">f<sub>NPV</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5936 KiB  
Article
A Self-Adaptive Escape Route Planning Model Based on Dynamic Wildfire Information
by Hesun Wang, Junhao Sheng, Xindong Li, Hongyang Zhao and Dandan Li
Fire 2024, 7(12), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120459 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 630
Abstract
Background: Escape routes are important measures for firefighters to ensure their own safety, providing predetermined paths to safe areas. Their establishment needs to consider numerous factors, such as the timeliness and safety of the routes. Aims: Optimize the path planning method previously studied [...] Read more.
Background: Escape routes are important measures for firefighters to ensure their own safety, providing predetermined paths to safe areas. Their establishment needs to consider numerous factors, such as the timeliness and safety of the routes. Aims: Optimize the path planning method previously studied by our team to ensure the dynamic nature, timeliness, and safety of the routes. Methods: (1) Propose a comprehensive safety index that encompasses both spatial and temporal safety indices, providing a more holistic approach to route safety. (2) Introduce spatial adaptive factors and spatial safety windows corresponding to the spatial safety index within the comprehensive safety index. (3) Present a new concept, the “observation cycle”, as a standard for the frequency of updating wildfire spread information, thereby addressing the issue of a lack of real-time input information. Based on this, we propose a reliable dynamic update rule for its updating. Results: Compared to the unoptimized model, the final optimized model’s planned escape routes offer impressive dynamic performance, effectively guarding against sudden changes in wildfire conditions, enhancing route safety, and ensuring timeliness. Conclusions: This research ensures that firefighters can effectively guard against the threats posed by sudden changes in wildfire conditions when escaping in wildfire environments, while also guaranteeing timeliness and safety. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research Area 1.1 and Research Area 1.2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The 15 sets of meteorological data input within the one-hour framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Possible directions for the firefighter to move forward from position n. The black arrow line indicates the horizontal or vertical direction, namely, n + 1, while the white arrow line indicates the diagonal direction, namely, the translation of n + 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evacuation route results with different spatial safety window values set in Research Areas 1.1 and 1.2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Legend information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Line graph of data for Research Area 1.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The path over six observation cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The path over four observation cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>From left to right, these are AT-Dijkstra, CP-ATS-Dijkstra, and DP-ATS-Dijkstra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>On the left is the intermediate fire situation, and on the right is the final fire situation.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5655 KiB  
Article
An Evaluation of Ground-Level Concentrations of Aerosols and Criteria Pollutants Using the CAMS Reanalysis Dataset over the Himawari-8 Observational Area, Including China, Indonesia, and Australia (2016–2023)
by Miles Sowden
Air 2024, 2(4), 419-438; https://doi.org/10.3390/air2040024 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 367
Abstract
This study assesses the performance of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalysis dataset in estimating ground-level concentrations (GLCs) of aerosols and criteria pollutants across the Himawari-8 observational area, covering China, Indonesia, and Australia, from 2016 to 2023. Ground-based monitoring networks in these [...] Read more.
This study assesses the performance of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalysis dataset in estimating ground-level concentrations (GLCs) of aerosols and criteria pollutants across the Himawari-8 observational area, covering China, Indonesia, and Australia, from 2016 to 2023. Ground-based monitoring networks in these regions are limited in scope, making it necessary to rely on satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) as a proxy for GLCs. While AOD offers broad coverage, it presents challenges, particularly in capturing surface-level pollution accurately during episodic events. CAMS, which integrates satellite data with atmospheric models, is evaluated here to determine its effectiveness in addressing these issues. The study employs square root transformation to normalize pollutant concentration data and calculates monthly–hourly long-term averages to isolate pollution anomalies. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) and Jacobian matrix (dY/dX) methods are applied to assess the spatial variability of pollutant concentrations and their relationship with meteorological factors. Results show that while CAMS captures large-scale pollution episodes, such as the 2019/2020 Australian wildfires, discrepancies in representing GLCs are apparent, especially when vertical aerosol stratification occurs during short-term pollution events. The study emphasizes the need for integrating CAMS data with higher-resolution satellite observations, like Himawari-8, to improve the accuracy of real-time air quality monitoring. The findings highlight important implications for public health interventions and environmental policy-making, particularly in regions with insufficient ground-based data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Himawari-8 observational area (pseudo true color) and study domain (white-box cropped at (x1 = 500, x2 = 3500; y1 = 500, y2 = 5000 to exclude outer edges), and (<b>b</b>) approximate geographic extent of the study area from 85° E to 160° E and 45° S to 50° N displayed as equal area projection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Data normalization (depicting maximum hour). Columns left to right are NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, and OM, respectively. Rows top to bottom are X, square root (X), and Log<sub>10</sub> (X), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatiotemporal variation by row of U, V, MSLP, and specific humidity. Columns are max hourly, max daily, annual average, Std Dev, and mean: January, April, July, and October, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Isopleths for CO, O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> (by row, respectively). Columns are max hourly, max daily, annual average, Std Dev, and mean: January, April, July, and October, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Isopleths of PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and, dust aerosol<sub>2.5</sub> (by row, respectively). Columns are max hourly, max daily, annual average, Std Dev, and mean: January, April, July, and October, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Isopleths of BC, OC, SU, and SS aerosols (by row, respectively). Columns are max hourly, max daily, annual average, Std Dev, and mean: January, April, July, and October, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Isopleths of NO, isoprene, formaldehyde, and ethane (by row, respectively). Columns are max hourly, max daily, annual average, Std Dev, and mean: January, April, July, and October, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Vertical ratio GLC/AOD of specific humidity (g/m<sup>2</sup>), sea spray, dust aerosol, organic material, black carbon, and sulfate aerosol (unitless 0 to 1 × 10<sup>6</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Annual analysis of anomalies for 2016 to 2023 (columns) for the criteria pollutants NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Timeseries of maximum hourly concentration per day for the pollutants (columns) NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, OC, and BC, respectively, and for the cities (rows) of Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, and Hanoi, respectively, over the eight-year period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Correlation matrix analysis for the meteorological parameters (columns = X) of msl, 1/T (Kelvin), U10, V10, q and the GLC (rows = Y) of NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> over the eight-year period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Jacobian matrix (LOG dY/dX) analysis for the meteorological parameters (columns = X) of msl, 1/T (Kelvin), U10, V10, q, respectively, and the GLC (rows = Y) of NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> over the eight-year period, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 2795 KiB  
Article
Importance Sampling for Cost-Optimized Estimation of Burn Probability Maps in Wildfire Monte Carlo Simulations
by Valentin Waeselynck and David Saah
Fire 2024, 7(12), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120455 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Background: Wildfire modelers rely on Monte Carlo simulations of wildland fire to produce burn probability maps. These simulations are computationally expensive. Methods: We study the application of importance sampling to accelerate the estimation of burn probability maps, using L2 distance as the metric [...] Read more.
Background: Wildfire modelers rely on Monte Carlo simulations of wildland fire to produce burn probability maps. These simulations are computationally expensive. Methods: We study the application of importance sampling to accelerate the estimation of burn probability maps, using L2 distance as the metric of deviation. Results: Assuming a large area of interest, we prove that the optimal proposal distribution reweights the probability of ignitions by the square root of the expected burned area divided by the expected computational cost and then generalize these results to the assets-weighted L2 distance. We also propose a practical approach to searching for a good proposal distribution. Conclusions: These findings contribute quantitative methods for optimizing the precision/computation ratio of wildfire Monte Carlo simulations without biasing the results, offer a principled conceptual framework for justifying and reasoning about other computational shortcuts, and can be readily generalized to a broader spectrum of simulation-based risk modeling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patterns, Drivers, and Multiscale Impacts of Wildland Fires)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Contour plot of the maximum potential efficiency gain from importance sampling for an imaginary model in which the cost <span class="html-italic">c</span> is proportional to a constant term plus the fire size <span class="html-italic">A</span> raised to the exponent <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ϵ</mi> </semantics></math> (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>). The underlying distribution of fire sizes is the one recorded in the FPA-FOD [<a href="#B14-fire-07-00455" class="html-bibr">14</a>] in the Conterminous United States from 1992 to 2020. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> is the natural size constant determined by the constant term. Note that the value of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> is immaterial.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Same-cost frequency multipliers for the optimal importance sampling scheme that reweights each pyrome uniformly. Each pyrome is colored by its frequency multiplier (note in particular that the color does not represent the prevalence of fire in each pyrome). The color bar is logarithmic and saturates to blue at 0.4 and to red at 2.5. More details in <a href="#fire-07-00455-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Same-cost frequency multipliers for the reweighting function fitted to Pyrome 33 (solid curve), along with the best possible reweighting function (point cloud) of the calibration sample. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> means the following: for the same compute time, importance sampling multiplies by <span class="html-italic">y</span> the sampling frequency of a fire of duration <span class="html-italic">x</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Same-cost frequency multipliers for the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> reweighting function fitted to Pyrome 33 (solid curve), along with the best possible reweighting function (point cloud) of the calibration sample.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2119 KiB  
Article
Mapping Variable Wildfire Source Areas Through Inverse Modeling
by Stephen W. Taylor, Nicholas Walsworth and Kerry Anderson
Fire 2024, 7(12), 454; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120454 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 465
Abstract
Global climate change is leading to increased wildfire activity in many parts of the world, and with increasing development, a heightened threat to communities in the wildland urban interface. Evaluating the potential for fire to affect communities and critical infrastructure is essential for [...] Read more.
Global climate change is leading to increased wildfire activity in many parts of the world, and with increasing development, a heightened threat to communities in the wildland urban interface. Evaluating the potential for fire to affect communities and critical infrastructure is essential for effective response decision-making and resource prioritization, including evacuation planning, with changing weather conditions during the fire season. Using a receptor–pathway–source assessment framework, we estimate the potential source area from which a wildfire could spread to a community in British Columbia by projecting fire growth outward from the community’s perimeter. The outer perimeter of the source area is effectively an evacuation trigger line for the forecast period. The novel aspects of our method are inverting fire growth in both space and time by reversing the wind direction, the time course of hourly weather, and slope and aspect inputs to a time-evolving fire growth simulation model Prometheus. We also ran a forward simulation from the perimeter of a large fire that was threatening the community to the community edge and back. In addition, we conducted a series of experiments to examine the influence of varying environmental conditions and ignition patterns on the invertibility of fire growth simulations. These cases demonstrate that time-evolving fire growth simulations can be inverted for practical purposes, although caution is needed when interpreting results in areas with extensive non-fuel cover or complex community perimeters. The advantages of this method over conventional simulation from a fire source are that it can be used for pre-attack planning before fire arrival, and following fire arrival, it does not require having an up-to-the-minute map of the fire location. The advantage over the use of minimum travel time methods for inverse modeling is that it allows for changing weather during the forecast period. This procedure provides a practical tool to inform real-time wildfire response decisions around communities, including resource allocation and evacuation planning, that could be implemented with several time-evolving fire growth models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hourly values of ISI, FFMC, and wind speed and direction used in the variable source area mapping example for 96 h (9–12 August 2018) in reverse order of time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Inverse fire growth simulation scenarios (see <a href="#fire-07-00454-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> for details). (<b>A</b>) Uniform wind, fuels, and topography (level). Polygon ignition. (<b>B</b>) Changing wind direction (uniform speed). Uniform fuels, and no topography. Polygon ignition. (<b>C</b>) Variable topography. Uniform wind direction and fuels. Polygon ignition. (<b>D</b>) Varying fuels. Uniform wind and topography. Polygon ignition. (<b>E</b>) Varying fuels (see legend) and topography. Uniform wind. Polygon ignition. (<b>F</b>) Fuel-free barriers in uniform fuels; uniform wind direction and topography. Single forward polygon ignition, and two polygon ignitions on return that merge. (<b>G</b>) Staggered polygon ignitions merge, changing wind, and uniform fuels and topography. (<b>H</b>) Complex ignition from multiple ignition polygons merging, and concave on return. Shifting wind direction, and uniform fuels and topography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The estimated potential wildfire source area surrounding Ft. St. James, British Columbia (red line) for 4 days (9–12 August 2018). Inset: location within BC. The final extent of the Shovel Lake fire is in dark grey.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Projected forward spread of the Shovel Lake Fire (grey polygon) from the pink perimeter easterly to the edge of the community (yellow line) and (<b>b</b>) backwards for the same time period from the community edge (magenta line) to reach the fire (orange line). Fires were ignited in sections along the (<b>a</b>) pink and (<b>b</b>) magenta lines. The white lines demarcate the contribution of the different sectors to overall fire growth as well as unburned areas.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2594 KiB  
Article
A Human Behavior Wildfire Ignition Probability Index for Application to Mainland Portugal
by Pedro Almeida, Isilda Cunha Menezes and Ana Isabel Miranda
Fire 2024, 7(12), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120447 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 481
Abstract
Wildfire ignitions are often linked to environmental and climatic factors, but human behavior plays a critical role, particularly in rural southern Europe. However, tools to quantify the probability of human-caused ignitions are lacking. This study addresses this by developing a human behavior wildfire [...] Read more.
Wildfire ignitions are often linked to environmental and climatic factors, but human behavior plays a critical role, particularly in rural southern Europe. However, tools to quantify the probability of human-caused ignitions are lacking. This study addresses this by developing a human behavior wildfire ignition probability index focused on mainland Portugal, a region historically vulnerable to wildfires. Statistical analyses, including multicollinearity checks and a Generalized Linear Model, were used to analyze ignition data, while geospatial analyses estimated the ignition probabilities for 2021 and 2022. Inputs included human activity indicators, land use types, and proximity to residential roads. The resulting probability maps identified high-risk areas, particularly in forested zones and near residential roads. These maps closely aligned with documented human-caused ignitions, confirming the model’s reliability. The index is a robust tool for identifying high-risk areas and has significant potential to improve fire prevention strategies by targeting the most vulnerable regions. Future research should explore its integration into forecasting systems for real-time fire prevention and response strategies as well as its adaptation to other regions with similar wildfire risks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustrative diagram of the methodology used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Histogram depicting the data matrix generated after applying the GLM equation on the grid points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Normal quantile plot of the response variable calculated for the grid points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spherical, (<b>b</b>) exponential and (<b>c</b>) Gaussian semivariogram models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Probability map of rural fire ignition due to human action for the years 2021 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Portuguese regions and the area of the Odemira municipality. (<b>b</b>) Spatial comparison between the human ignition probability map and land use. (<b>c</b>) Spatial comparison between the human ignition probability map and the road network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Probability map of human-caused ignition risk overlaid with the locations of human-caused ignitions registered by the ICNF (<b>a</b>) for the year 2021 and (<b>b</b>) for the year 2022.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6711 KiB  
Article
Revolutionizing Wildfire Detection Through UAV-Driven Fire Monitoring with a Transformer-Based Approach
by Shakhnoza Muksimova, Sabina Umirzakova, Sevara Mardieva, Mirjamol Abdullaev and Young Im Cho
Fire 2024, 7(12), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120443 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 413
Abstract
The rapid detection and accurate localization of wildfires are critical for effective disaster management and response. This study proposes an innovative Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)-based fire detection system leveraging a modified Miti-DETR model tailored to meet the computational constraints of drones. The enhanced [...] Read more.
The rapid detection and accurate localization of wildfires are critical for effective disaster management and response. This study proposes an innovative Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)-based fire detection system leveraging a modified Miti-DETR model tailored to meet the computational constraints of drones. The enhanced architecture incorporates a redesigned AlexNet backbone with residual depthwise separable convolution blocks, significantly reducing computational load while improving feature extraction and accuracy. Furthermore, a novel residual self-attention mechanism addresses convergence issues in transformer networks, ensuring robust feature representation for complex aerial imagery. The model, which was trained on the FLAME dataset encompassing diverse fire scenarios, demonstrates superior performance in terms of Mean Average Precision (mAP) and Intersection over Union (IoU) metrics compared to existing systems. Its capability to detect and localize fires across varied backgrounds highlights its practical application in real-world scenarios. This advancement represents a pivotal step forward in applying deep learning for real-time wildfire detection, with implications for broader emergency management applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Forest fire incidents in South Korea from 2011 to 2023 [<a href="#B2-fire-07-00443" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Modified Miti-DERT framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Modified AlexNet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Description of FLAME dataset examples: (<b>a</b>) non-fire and (<b>b</b>) fire.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Examples of data augmentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Examples of proposed model results: (<b>a</b>) Detection of smoke in snowy forest environments. (<b>b</b>) Identification of fire regions partially obscured by tree canopies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Examples of proposed model results: (<b>a</b>) Detection of smoke in snowy forest environments. (<b>b</b>) Identification of fire regions partially obscured by tree canopies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Evaluating YOLO Models and a Proposed Enhancement: Precision Metrics Across Object Scales.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop