Search Results (1,177)

Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy (RARP and ORP) are established procedures for localized prostate cancer, with comparable oncological and functional outcomes. Little is known about patients’ knowledge of both procedures. This study aimed to examine comparatively the informational behaviour and knowledge of patients undergoing ORP vs. RARP. Methods: This prospective, multicentre study included patients who underwent RARP or ORP prior to presurgery counselling. The questionnaires gathered information about patients’ information-seeking behaviours and their assessment of outcomes for RARP vs. ORP. We investigated risk factors for the misperception of procedure outcomes. Results: A total of 508 patients were included (307 RARP (60%); 201 ORP (40%)). The most common sources of information were outpatient urologists (84%), urologic departments (67%) and the internet (57%). Compared with ORP, RARP patients more often received the same amount of information about both procedures (60% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). Compared with ORP, RARP patients wrongfully considered their procedure to be superior in terms of oncological and functional outcomes. In the multivariable analysis, age > 66 years (OR 2.1, p = 0.02), no high school degree (OR 1.9, p = 0.04), unbalanced information search (OR 2.4, p = 0.02), RARP patient status (OR 8.9, p < 0.001), and treatment at a centre offering only one procedure (OR 3.5, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of misperception. Conclusions: RARP patients wrongfully considered their intervention to be oncologically and functionally more beneficial than ORP patients perceived it to be. This may be due to unbalanced sources of information. Urologists and surgical centres must address this misperception to enable patients to make informed decisions. Full article

OBJECTIVE. The optimal surgical approach for thymoma resection is still an object of debate. The increasing experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has led to the progressive affirmation of this technique as a valid alternative to Sternotomy, Thoracotomy and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) in this setting. The present study aims to compare the post-operative and short-term results of RATS Thymectomy for thymoma with those of other main surgical approaches (sternotomy, thoracotomy and VATS) from a high-volume single center. METHODS. Between May 2021 and September 2023, 40 consecutive patients underwent RATS Thymectomy for stage I to limited-stage III thymoma in our center. Three homogenous groups of patients who received thymoma resection through main alternative approaches (sternotomy, thoracotomy, VATS) over the last 5 years, were identified in order to perform a comparative analysis. Data including surgery duration, associated resections, conversion rate, overall morbidity, tumor size, radicality of resection, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay and cosmetic results were retrospectively collected and compared between the RATS and each control group. RESULTS. Mean tumor size was higher in the sternotomy group, but not significantly. The mean operative time of RATS interventions was significantly lower than that of sternotomy and VATS. It was significantly shorter compared to thoracotomy if excluding docking-undocking time. A higher rate of associated adjacent structures resection was reported in the sternotomy group (p = 0.005). Conversion rate was significantly higher in the VATS group (p = 0.026) compared to RATS. Post-operative pain at 24 and 48 h was significantly lower in the RATS group compared to the others. Improved cosmetics results were reported after RATS compared to sternotomy (p = 0.0001) and thoracotomy (p = 0.001) groups, with a trend towards better results compared to VATS (p = 0.05). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the RATS group with a significant difference vs. the sternotomy group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. These results from a single center confirm the safety and efficacy of RATS for the treatment of limited stage thymoma. An advantage in terms of operative outcomes, post-operative pain, cosmetic results and hospital stay was observed if compared to the alternative approaches. The short-term oncologic outcome was excellent based on the high complete resection rate of the tumor. Full article

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology in healthcare, with its integration into cardiac surgery offering significant advancements in precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes. However, a comprehensive understanding of AI’s applications, benefits, challenges, and future directions in cardiac surgery is needed to inform its safe and effective implementation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, covering publications from January 2000 to November 2024. Studies focusing on AI applications in cardiac surgery, including risk stratification, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative management, were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using standardized tools, and findings were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 121 studies were included in this review. AI demonstrated superior predictive capabilities in risk stratification, with machine learning models outperforming traditional scoring systems in mortality and complication prediction. Robotic-assisted systems enhanced surgical precision and minimized trauma, while computer vision and augmented cognition improved intraoperative guidance. Postoperative AI applications showed potential in predicting complications, supporting patient monitoring, and reducing healthcare costs. However, challenges such as data quality, validation, ethical considerations, and integration into clinical workflows remain significant barriers to widespread adoption. Conclusions: AI has the potential to revolutionize cardiac surgery by enhancing decision making, surgical accuracy, and patient outcomes. Addressing limitations related to data quality, bias, validation, and regulatory frameworks is essential for its safe and effective implementation. Future research should focus on interdisciplinary collaboration, robust testing, and the development of ethical and transparent AI systems to ensure equitable and sustainable advancements in cardiac surgery. Full article

Background and Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, with colon cancer accounting for approximately 60% of all CRC cases. Surgery remains the primary and most effective treatment. Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has emerged as a promising approach for colon cancer resection. This retrospective study compares RAS and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LSS) for stage I–III colon cancer resections at a single medical center in East Asia. Methods: Between 1 January 2018, and 29 February 2024, patients undergoing colectomy were classified into right-side and left-side colectomies. Propensity score matching was conducted based on age group, gender, ASA score, and BMI to ensure comparability between groups. After matching, there were 50 RAS and 200 LSS cases for right colectomy (RC), and 129 RAS and 258 LSS cases for left colectomy (LC). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The primary outcomes were recovery milestones, while secondary outcomes included complications and postoperative pain scores. Results: RAS demonstrated faster recovery milestones compared to LSS (hospital stay: 6.5 vs. 10.2 days, p = 0.005 for RC; 5.5 vs. 8.2 days, p < 0.001 for LC). RAS also resulted in lower rates of ileus (14% vs. 26%, p = 0.064 for RC; 6.2% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.007 for LC) and higher lymph node yields (31.4 vs. 26.8, p = 0.028 for RC; 25.8 vs. 23.9, p = 0.066 for LC). Major complication rates showed no significant difference between RAS and LSS (4.0% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.746 for RC; 4.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.563 for LC). Patients in the RAS group experienced earlier diuretic phases and reported significantly lower postoperative pain scores (3.0 vs. 4.1, p = 0.011 for RC; 2.9 vs. 4.1, p < 0.001 for LC). Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery is associated with faster recovery, lower rates of ileus (LC), higher lymph node yield (RC) and reduced postoperative pain compared to laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer resection. Full article

Current teleoperated robotic systems for retinal surgery cannot effectively control subtle tool-to-tissue interaction forces. This limitation may lead to patient injury caused by the surgeon’s mistakes. To improve the safety of retinal surgery, this paper proposes a haptic shared control framework for teleoperation based on a force-constrained supervisory controller. The supervisory controller leverages Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) and the interaction model to modify teleoperated inputs when they are deemed unsafe. This method ensures that the interaction forces at the slave robot’s end-effector remain within the safe range without the robot’s dynamic model and the safety margin. Additionally, the master robot provides haptic feedback to enhance the surgeon’s situational awareness during surgery, reducing the risk of misjudgment. Finally, simulated membrane peeling experiments are conducted in a controlled intraocular surgical environment using a teleoperated robotic system controlled by a non-expert. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed control framework significantly reduces the rate of force constraint violation. Full article

Objectives: The impact of long-term complications after robotic hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), including persistent angina, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction (MI), remains limited. This study aims to determine the risk factors for coronary events after robotic HCR and their time-varying effects on outcomes. Methods: We identified all consecutive patients who underwent robotic HCR at our institution. Baseline characteristics were explored as possible risk factors for angina, MI, and repeat revascularization with stents at any time during the follow-up. Results: A total of 875 patients (mean age 71.1 ± 11.1 years) were included. After a median follow-up of 3.32 years (IQR 1.18–6.34 years), angina occurred in 134 patients (15.3%), repeat revascularization with stents in 139 patients (15.8%), and MI in 36 patients (4.1%). The hazard rates for all outcomes increased with follow-up time, with a notable early rise around two years of follow-up for angina and, to a lesser extent, repeat revascularization. The risk factors were the lack of radial artery graft use, black race, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low ejection fraction <50%, severe left main coronary artery stenosis (>50%), and more than three-vessel disease. Conclusions: Optimization of modifiable periprocedural risk factors may positively impact long-term prognosis in patients undergoing robotic HCR. Full article

Wearable motion capture gloves enable the precise analysis of hand and finger movements for a variety of uses, including robotic surgery, rehabilitation, and most commonly, virtual augmentation. However, many motion capture gloves restrict natural hand movement with a closed-palm design, including fabric over the palm and fingers. In order to alleviate slippage, improve comfort, reduce sizing issues, and eliminate movement restrictions, this paper presents a new low-cost data glove with an innovative open-palm and finger-free design. The new design improves usability and overall functionality by addressing the limitations of traditional closed-palm designs. It is especially beneficial in capturing movements in fields such as physical therapy and robotic surgery. The new glove incorporates resistive flex sensors (RFSs) at each finger and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) at the wrist joint to measure wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, and rotation. Initially the sensors were tested individually for drift, synchronisation delays, and linearity. The results show a drift of 6.60°/h in the IMU and no drift in the RFSs. There was a 0.06 s delay in the data captured by the IMU compared to the RFSs. The glove’s performance was tested with a collaborate robot testing setup. In static conditions, it was found that the IMU had a worst case error across three trials of 7.01° and a mean absolute error (MAE) averaged over three trials of 4.85°, while RFSs had a worst case error of 3.77° and a MAE of 1.25° averaged over all five RFSs used. There was no clear correlation between measurement error and speed. Overall, the new glove design proved to accurately measure joint angles. Full article

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely performed surgical procedure that has evolved significantly due to advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. As demand for THA grows, reliable tools are essential to enhance diagnosis, preoperative planning, surgical precision, and postoperative rehabilitation. AI applications in orthopedic surgery offer innovative solutions, including automated hip osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis, precise implant positioning, and personalized risk stratification, thereby improving patient outcomes. Deep learning models have transformed OA severity grading and implant identification by automating traditionally manual processes with high accuracy. Additionally, AI-powered systems optimize preoperative planning by predicting the hip joint center and identifying complications using multimodal data. Robotic-assisted THA enhances surgical precision with real-time feedback, reducing complications such as dislocations and leg length discrepancies while accelerating recovery. Despite these advancements, barriers such as cost, accessibility, and the steep learning curve for surgeons hinder widespread adoption. Postoperative rehabilitation benefits from technologies like virtual and augmented reality and telemedicine, which enhance patient engagement and adherence. However, limitations, particularly among elderly populations with lower adaptability to technology, underscore the need for user-friendly platforms. To ensure comprehensiveness, a structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords included “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “robotics”, and “total hip arthroplasty”. Inclusion criteria emphasized peer-reviewed studies published in English within the last decade focusing on technological advancements and clinical outcomes. This review evaluates AI and robotics’ role in THA, highlighting opportunities and challenges and emphasizing further research and real-world validation to integrate these technologies into clinical practice effectively. Full article

Objectives: Accurate target definition, treatment planning and delivery increases local tumor control for radiotherapy by minimizing collateral damage. To achieve this goal for uveal melanoma (UM), tantalum fiducial markers (TFMs) were previously introduced in proton and photon beam radiotherapy. However, TFMs cause pronounced scattering effects in imaging that make the delineation of small tumors difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate silicone fiducial markers (SFMs) for the guiding of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for UM. Methods: In this retrospective interventional pilot case series, three patients with small UMs 3 mm or less in tumor thickness and ≤10 mm in largest basal diameter received silicone fiducial markers. The fiducial markers were punched out (3 mm) from conventional silicone encircling bands for buckle surgery. The markers were sutured onto the sclera at the tumor margins according to the use of TFMs. MRI and CT images were used for the localization of the tumor and the markers before robotic-guided SRS. Results: The silicone fiducial markers were punched out easily from the original band, better to handle than TFMs and easy to suture onto the sclera. They could be visualized in both MRI and CT, but were more visible in CT. In the absence of scattering effects, both the markers and thus the tumor boundaries could be clearly delineated. Conclusions: This is the first report that introduces fiducial markers intraoperatively shaped from conventional silicone encircling bands usually used for retinal detachment surgery. The SFMs allow more accurate tumor delineation, resulting in the more precise planning and administration of SRS when compared to TFMs. This simple modification has a major impact on a well-known treatment approach. Full article

Background/Objectives: EnBloc resections of bone tumors of the spine are very demanding as the target to achieve a tumor-free margin specimen (sometimes impossible due to the extracompartimental tumor extension) is sometimes conflicting with the integrity of neurological functions and spine stability. Methods: The surgical treatment of a huge multi-level chordoma of the thoracic spine with unusual extension is reported. Anteriorly, the tumor widely invaded the mediastinum and displaced the aorta; on the left side, it expanded in the subpleuric region; posteriorly, it was uncommonly distant 13 mm from the posterior wall. Results: EnBloc resection is largely performed for primary bone tumors of the spine and many reports have been published concerning brilliant solutions to difficult issues of surgical anatomy. One of the major challenges is still the compatibility between oncological and functional requirements. Conclusions: Oncological staging, careful imaging analysis, a multidisciplinary surgical team, and utilization of the most recent technologies like navigation and robotics have made an oncologically appropriate EnBloc resection of a multi-level chordoma of the thoracic spine possible without affecting the continuity of the spinal canal and without any involvement of its content by an original “L”-shaped osteotomy. Full article

Background/Objectives: For healthcare institutions developing a robotic programme, delivering value for patients, clinicians, and payers is key. However, the impact on the surgeon, training pathways, and logistics are often overlooked. We conducted a study on the impact of robotic surgery on surgeons, access to robotic surgical training, and factors associated with developing a successful robotic programme. Method: In our international mixed-methods study, a customised web-based survey was circulated to gynaecological oncologists. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher’s exact test, tested the hypothesis of the differences in continuous and categorical variables. Multiple linear regression was used to model the effect of variables on outcomes adjusting for gender, age, and postgraduate experience. Outcomes included situational awareness, surgeon fatigue/stress, and the surgical learning curve. Qualitative data were collected via in-depth semi-structured interviews using an inductive theoretical framework to explore access to surgical training and logistical considerations in the development of a successful robotic programme. Results: In total, 94%, 45%, and 48% of survey respondents (n = 152) stated that robotic surgery was less physically tiring/mentally tiring/stressful in comparison to laparoscopic surgery. Our data suggest gender differences in the robotics learning curve with men six times more likely to state robotic surgery had negatively impacted their situational awareness in the operating theatre (OR = 6.35, p ≤ 0.001) and 2.5 times more likely to state it had negatively impacted their surgical ability due to lack of haptic feedback in comparison to women (OR = 2.62, p = 0.046). Women were more risk-averse in case selection, but there were no self-reported differences in the intra-operative complication rates between male and female surgeons (OR = 1, p = 0.1). In total, 22/25 robotically trained surgeons interviewed did not follow a structured curriculum of learning. Low and middle income country centres had less access to robotic surgery. The success of robotic programmes was measured by the number of cases performed per annum, with 74% of survey respondents stating that introducing robotics increased the proportion of surgeries performed by minimal access surgery. There was a distinct lack of knowledge on the environmental impact of robotic surgery. Conclusions: Whilst robotic surgery is considered a landmark innovation in surgery, it must be responsibly implemented through effective training and waste minimisation, which must be a key metric in measuring the success of robotic programmes. Full article

Background: The adoption of robotic surgery has been widespread and increasing amongst gynecologic surgeons given the ability to decrease morbidity. It is important that plastic surgeons adjust their reconstructive algorithm to ascertain the benefits of robotic-assisted surgery. Herein we report our outcomes of robotic-assisted rectus abdominis muscle reconstruction of the posterior vaginal wall along with a current literature review on robotic-assisted reconstructive pelvic surgery. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review was completed of all patients who underwent robotic pelvic reconstruction between 2016 and 2024 at a single institution. Patients who underwent posterior vaginal wall reconstruction utilizing a robotic-assisted rectus abdominis muscle (RRAM) were selected for final analysis. Results: Thirty-two patients were identified who underwent pelvic reconstruction using robotic surgical techniques. Five (mean age = 56.2, 32–72; mean BMI = 30.0, 24–39.9) underwent posterior vaginal wall reconstruction with an RRAM flap. Two patients (40%) had minor wound complications, and one patient (20%) had vaginal stenosis eight years after operation. None had major complications requiring a return to the OR or hospital admission. All patients went on to achieve successful healing. Conclusions: In the literature, robotic-assisted surgery has shown significant advantages, including reduced morbidity with decreased intra-operative blood loss, reduced pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays. The RRAM flap for pelvic reconstruction is well tolerated in patients despite comorbidities and preserves the minimally invasive benefits of extirpative surgery. As the technology becomes more widely incorporated, it is important for plastic surgeons to integrate robotic surgical techniques into their practice. Full article

Background: The artificial urinary sphincter has been an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women. However, the use of this device has been limited by the technical difficulties and risks associated with the open implantation procedure. Preliminary studies using robotic techniques have shown promising results, but only one small study has compared robotic to open procedures. This study aims to compare the outcomes of robotic and open artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in a large multicenter cohort. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from female patients who underwent open or robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation from 2006 to 2020 at 12 urology departments. The primary outcome was the rate of complications within 30 days after surgery, graded using the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Perioperative and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 135 patients were included, with 71 in the robotic group and 64 in the open group. The open group had a higher rate of intraoperative complications (27.4% vs. 12.7%; p = 0.03) and postoperative complications (46.8% vs. 15.5%; p < 0.0001). More patients in the robotic group achieved full continence (83.3% vs. 62.3%; p = 0.01). The open group had higher explantation (27.4% vs. 1.4%; p < 0.0001) and revision rates (17.5% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.02). The estimated 1-year explantation-free survival rate was higher in the robotic group. (98.6% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Robot-assisted implantation may reduce perioperative morbidity and improve functional outcomes compared to open implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. Full article

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adrenal glands is becoming increasingly developed worldwide and robotic surgery has advanced significantly. Although there are still concerns about the generalization of outcomes and the cost burden, the robotic platform shows several advantages in overcoming some laparoscopic shortcomings. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases of published articles comparing RA and LA up to January 2024. The evaluated endpoints were technical and post-operative outcomes. Dichotomous data were calculated using the odds ratio (OR), while continuous data were analyzed usingmean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A random-effects model (REM) was applied. Results: By the inclusion of 28 studies, the meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the rates of intraoperative RBC transfusion, 30-day mortality, intraoperative and overall postoperative complications, re-admission, R1 resection margin and operating time in the RA group compared with the LA. However, the overall cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in the RA group than in the LA group, [MD USD 4101.32, (95% CI 3894.85, 4307.79) p < 0.00001]. With respect to the mean intraoperative blood loss, conversion to open surgery rate, time to first flatus and length of hospital stay, the RA group showed slightly statistically significant lower rates than the laparoscopic approach. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest and most recent meta-analysis that makes these comparisons. RA can be considered safe, feasible and comparable to LA in terms of the intraoperative and post-operative outcomes. In the near future, RA could represent a promising complementary approachto LA for benign and small malignant adrenal masses, particularly in high-volume referral centers specializing in robotic surgery. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Full article

Background: Lymphadenectomy is considered a key part of the radical treatment of resectable lung cancer, although its appropriate extension in early stages is a debated topic due to the great heterogeneity of studies in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy extent on survival and recurrence in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy and lymph node dissection. Methods: Data from clinical stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy and hilar-mediastinal lymphadenectomy at two thoracic surgery centers from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Information regarding perioperative outcomes and lymphadenectomy details was collected and analyzed, and their impact on OS, CSS, and DFS was assessed. Results: During the period under review, 323 patients with stage cI lung cancer underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy. Statistical analysis showed that the evaluated lymph nodal factors (mean number of lymph nodes removed and number and type of lymph node station explored) did not statistically significantly impact OS, CSS, and DFS at a median follow-up of 59 months (IQR 45–71). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that a less invasive procedure than systematic lymphadenectomy could be performed in early-stage cases with adequate preoperative staging. Full article