[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (424)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sugarcane yield

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 10157 KiB  
Article
Effects of Intermittent Drought During Tillering and Stalk Elongation Stages on the Physiological Attributes of Diverse Sugarcane Genotypes
by Mintra Tippa-art, Peeraya Klomsa-ard, Patcharin Songsri and Nakorn Jongrungklang
Stresses 2025, 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010001 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
The growth and yield of sugarcane have been negatively impacted by drought stress, particularly during two stages of development, namely, tillering and elongation. This research aimed to determine the responses of diverse sugarcane cultivars under water-withholding conditions during the tillering and stalk elongation [...] Read more.
The growth and yield of sugarcane have been negatively impacted by drought stress, particularly during two stages of development, namely, tillering and elongation. This research aimed to determine the responses of diverse sugarcane cultivars under water-withholding conditions during the tillering and stalk elongation stages. A factorial experiment in CRD with four replications was used. Two water regimes were allocated to factor A, namely, providing water and controlling soil moisture at the field capacity (FC), and providing water-withholding (WW) conditions continuously at the tillering and elongation stages. Five different sugarcane cultivars were assigned to factor B. Drought significantly impacts the physiological characteristics of sugarcane during both the tillering and stalk elongation stages, with the tillering stage being more severely affected. KK3 and PK4 demonstrated superior drought tolerance in terms of relative water content and stomatal conductance, maintaining higher levels compared to the others. Increased proline content in the roots of K88-92 and MPT14-618 under drought conditions facilitated osmotic adjustment. Biomass production varied significantly across genotypes, with MPT14-618, KK3, and K88-92 maintaining better biomass compared to UT12 and PK4. The findings suggest that drought stress differentially impacts sugarcane genotypes, with KK3, K88-92, and MPT14-618 exhibiting superior physiological and growth resistance. These genotypes show promising potential for cultivation in arid regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant and Photoautotrophic Stresses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Stomatal conductance (Gs) for five sugarcane genotypes (KK3 (<b>A</b>), K88-92 (<b>B</b>), UT12 (<b>C</b>), MPT14-618 (<b>D</b>), and PK4 (<b>E</b>)) grown under drought conditions in the tillering stage and stalk elongation stage. Means with * and ** in the same observation point are significantly different by least significant difference (LSD) at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) for five sugarcane genotypes (KK3 (<b>A</b>), K88-92 (<b>B</b>), UT12 (<b>C</b>), MPT14-618 (<b>D</b>), and PK4 (<b>E</b>)) grown under drought conditions in the tillering stage and stalk elongation stage. Means with * and ** in the same observation point are significantly different by least significant difference (LSD) at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) for five sugarcane genotypes (KK3 (<b>A</b>), K88-92 (<b>B</b>), UT12 (<b>C</b>), MPT14-618 (<b>D</b>), and PK4 (<b>E</b>)) grown under drought conditions in the tillering stage and stalk elongation stage. Means with * and ** in the same observation point are significantly different by least significant difference (LSD) at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relative water content (RWC) for five sugarcane genotypes (KK3 (<b>A</b>), K88-92 (<b>B</b>), UT12 (<b>C</b>), MPT14-618 (<b>D</b>), and PK4 (<b>E</b>)) grown under drought conditions in the tillering stage and stalk elongation stage. Means with * and ** in the same observation point are significantly different by least significant difference (LSD) at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Proline accumulation of five varieties under field capacity (FC) and water-withholding conditions (WW). Vertical bars indicate LSD values of 0.05 if the proline in the leaf (<b>A</b>) and proline in the root (<b>B</b>) are significant (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Means in the same column with the same letters are not different by 95% LSD at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05. Uppercase letters describe the varietal differences under FC, while lowercase letters describe the varietal differences under WW treatment. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cane height of five sugarcane genotypes (KK3 (<b>A</b>), K88-92 (<b>B</b>), UT12 (<b>C</b>), MPT14-618 (<b>D</b>), and PK4 (<b>E</b>)) under field capacity (FC) and water stress (WS) conditions from 75 to 161 days after planting. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The number of shoots during the tillering stage (<b>A</b>), the number of stalks during the stalk elongation stage (<b>B</b>), and stalk diameter during the stalk elongation stage (<b>C</b>) under field capacity (FC) and water-withholding (WW) conditions. Means within the same column with the same letters are not significantly different at the 95% LSD level (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Uppercase letters describe the varietal differences under FC, while lowercase letters describe the varietal differences under WW conditions. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Biomass of five sugarcane varieties in the tillering stage (<b>A</b>) and the stalk elongation stage (<b>B</b>) under different irrigation treatments. Means with ns, *, and ** indicate non-significant and significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. Means within the same column with the same letters are not significantly different, according to the 95% LSD at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05. Uppercase letters describe the varietal differences of genotypes during FC and WW treatment. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Rainfall (mm), relative humidity (%), and maximum and minimum temperature from October 2021 to May 2022 (<b>A</b>), and soil moisture contents between the tillering and stalk elongation stages (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Comparison of sugarcane growth during field capacity (FC) treatment (right) and water-withholding treatment (left) in the tillering stage (<b>A</b>), and during water-withholding treatment (right) and FC treatment (left) in the stalk elongation stage (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot of sugarcane genotypes in the tillering stage (<b>A</b>) and the stalk elongation stage (<b>B</b>). This PCA biplot displays the relationship between various traits and different sugarcane genotypes (K88-92, KK3, MPT14-618, PK4, and UT12). Each point represents a genotype, and the vectors represent different physiological traits contributing to the variation among the genotypes under water-withholding conditions.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 3116 KiB  
Article
Synergistic Effect of Sugarcane Bagasse and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Eco-Remediation of Cadmium-Contaminated Saline Soils in Wheat Cultivation
by Emad M. Hafez, Khadiga Alharbi, Hany S. Gharib, Alaa El-Dein Omara, Essam Elatafi, Maha M. Hamada, Emadelden Rashwan and Tarek Alshaal
Plants 2025, 14(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010085 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 517
Abstract
Soil contamination with cadmium (Cd) and salinity poses a significant challenge, affecting crop health and productivity. This study explores the combined application of sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd and salinity in wheat [...] Read more.
Soil contamination with cadmium (Cd) and salinity poses a significant challenge, affecting crop health and productivity. This study explores the combined application of sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd and salinity in wheat plants. Field experiments conducted in Cd-contaminated saline soils revealed that the application of SCB (0, 5, and 10 t ha−1) and ZnO NPs (0, 12.5, and 25 mg L−1) significantly improved key soil physicochemical properties, including soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP). The combined application of SCB and ZnO NPs significantly mitigated the effects of Cd and salinity on soil and wheat plants. SCB (10 t ha−1) reduced soil pH by 6.2% and ESP by 30.8% compared to the control, while increasing microbial biomass by 151.1%. ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1) reduced Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seeds by 46.3%, while SCB and ZnO NPs combined achieved a reduction of 74.1% and 62.9%, respectively. These amendments enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, with catalase (CAT) increasing by 35.3% and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) by 54.9%. Wheat grain yield increased by 42% with SCB alone and by 75.2% with combined SCB and ZnO NP treatment, underscoring their potential as eco-friendly soil amendments for saline, Cd-contaminated soils. These results underscore the potential of SCB and ZnO NPs as eco-friendly amendments for improving wheat productivity in contaminated soils, offering a promising strategy for sustainable agriculture in salt-affected areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials on Plant Growth and Stress Adaptation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on microbial biomass content (mg g<sup>−1</sup> soil). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on (<b>A</b>), bacteria (Log cfu g<sup>−1</sup> soil) (<b>B</b>), <span class="html-italic">Azotobacter</span> (Log cfu g<sup>−1</sup> soil) (<b>C</b>), and <span class="html-italic">Bacillus</span> (Log cfu g<sup>−1</sup> soil) (<b>D</b>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on shoot cadmium (<b>A</b>) and seed cadmium (<b>B</b>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on bioconcentration factor (BCF) (<b>A</b>), translocation factor (TF) (<b>B</b>), and bioaccumulation coefficient (BAC) (<b>C</b>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on Na (mg g<sup>−1</sup> DW) (<b>A</b>), K (mg g<sup>−1</sup> DW) (<b>B</b>), Mg (mg g<sup>−1</sup> DW) (<b>C</b>), and Zn (mg 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) (<b>D</b>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) foliar application (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on peroxidase (APX) (µmol H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> g<sup>−1</sup> FW min<sup>−1</sup>) (<b>A</b>) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (µmol g<sup>−1</sup> FW) (<b>B</b>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on photosynthetic rate ( μmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The interaction effect between sugarcane bagasse (SCB) (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (mg L<sup>−1</sup>) on grain yield (ton ha<sup>−1</sup>). Different letters on bars show significant differences at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.0.5 according to Tukey’s test. Data are mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6837 KiB  
Article
Automatic Filtering of Sugarcane Yield Data
by Eudocio Rafael Otavio da Silva, José Paulo Molin, Marcelo Chan Fu Wei and Ricardo Canal Filho
AgriEngineering 2024, 6(4), 4812-4830; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6040275 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 491
Abstract
Sugarcane mechanized harvesting generates large volumes of data that are used to monitor harvesters’ functionalities. The dynamic interaction of the machine-onboard instrumentation–crop system introduces discrepant and noisy values into the data, requiring outlier detectors to support this complex and empirical decision. This study [...] Read more.
Sugarcane mechanized harvesting generates large volumes of data that are used to monitor harvesters’ functionalities. The dynamic interaction of the machine-onboard instrumentation–crop system introduces discrepant and noisy values into the data, requiring outlier detectors to support this complex and empirical decision. This study proposes an automatic filtering technique for sugarcane harvesting data to automate the process. A three-step automated filtering algorithm based on a sliding window was developed and further evaluated with four configurations of the maximum variation factor f and six SW sizes. The performance of the proposed method was assessed by using artificial outliers in the datasets with an outlier magnitude (OM) of ±0.01 to ±1.00. Three case studies with real crop data were presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed filter in detecting outliers of different magnitudes, compared to filtering by another method in the literature. In each dataset, the proposed filter detected nearly 100% of larger (OM = ±1.00 and ±0.80) and medium (OM = ±0.50) magnitudes’ outliers, and approximately 26% of smaller outliers (OM = ±0.10, ±0.05, and ±0.01). The proposed algorithm preserved wider ranges of data compared to the comparative method and presented equivalent results in the identification of regions with different productive potentials of sugarcane in the field. Therefore, the proposed method retained data that reflect sugarcane yield variability at the row level and it can be used in practical application scenarios to deal with large datasets obtained from sugarcane harvesters. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scheme for obtaining sliding window (SW) during sugarcane harvesting. Data array (<b>A</b>), initial window construction (<b>B</b>), window sliding from one subset to next until iteration of full matrix (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Method of detection and filtering discrepant data using sliding window (SW) algorithm. Highlighted data in yellow represents SW size equal to five elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structure of proposed filtering algorithm for different approaches, in which different configurations of sliding window (SW) size and variation factor <span class="html-italic">f</span> were tested. A1, A2, A3, and A4: approaches 1, 2, 3, and 4; Med<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span>: median of values located within sliding window; <span class="html-italic">f</span>: variation factor accepted for median; LL: lower limit; UL: upper limit; val: value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geographic locations of datasets 1 (Catanduva, SP) and 2 (São José do Rio Preto, SP), northwest region of the State of São Paulo, Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Averages of the filtered data (outliers and inliers) for the different sliding window sizes in the proposed approaches (<span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis on the left) and execution times of the proposed filtering algorithm (<span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis on the right) for dataset 1 (<b>A</b>) and 2 (<b>B</b>). SW: sliding window. A1, A2, A3, and A4: approaches 1, 2, 3, and 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Performance in the detection of artificial outliers (%) by the proposed data filtering under different approaches and SW sizes for dataset 1 (<b>A</b>) and dataset 2 (<b>B</b>). OM: Outlier magnitude. AO: Artificial outlier. A1, A2, A3, and A4: Approaches 1, 2, 3, and 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The detection of outliers by the sliding window method proposed for the sugarcane harvesting data corresponding to the operations of displacement (<b>A</b>), stop (<b>B</b>), and maneuver (<b>C</b>) of the harvester in the field in datasets 1 and 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Filtered yield maps from (<b>A</b>) the proposed sliding window algorithm and (<b>B</b>) Mapfilter 2.0 from dataset 1. Similarly, (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) show the results of dataset 2, filtered by the same methods. In (<b>C</b>,<b>F</b>), the observations of a row of sugarcane from each dataset are plotted, showing similarities in the observations, with the proposed filtering method capturing more variability in the row.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Yield maps filtered by the proposed method using the best configuration of the sliding window algorithm (A1, SW = 50, <span class="html-italic">f</span> = 0.30) for dataset 3. Three rows in field 5 are highlighted, illustrating the variability within and between them.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7643 KiB  
Review
Evolution and Function of MADS-Box Transcription Factors in Plants
by Zihao Zhang, Wenhui Zou, Peixia Lin, Zixun Wang, Ye Chen, Xiaodong Yang, Wanying Zhao, Yuanyuan Zhang, Dongjiao Wang, Youxiong Que and Qibin Wu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(24), 13278; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413278 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 618
Abstract
The MADS-box transcription factor (TF) gene family is pivotal in various aspects of plant biology, particularly in growth, development, and environmental adaptation. It comprises Type I and Type II categories, with the MIKC-type subgroups playing a crucial role in regulating genes essential for [...] Read more.
The MADS-box transcription factor (TF) gene family is pivotal in various aspects of plant biology, particularly in growth, development, and environmental adaptation. It comprises Type I and Type II categories, with the MIKC-type subgroups playing a crucial role in regulating genes essential for both the vegetative and reproductive stages of plant life. Notably, MADS-box proteins can influence processes such as flowering, fruit ripening, and stress tolerance. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the structural features, evolutionary lineage, multifaceted functions, and the role of MADS-box TFs in responding to biotic and abiotic stresses. We particularly emphasize their implications for crop enhancement, especially in light of recent advances in understanding the impact on sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), a vital tropical crop. By consolidating cutting-edge findings, we highlight potential avenues for expanding our knowledge base and enhancing the genetic traits of sugarcane through functional genomics and advanced breeding techniques. This review underscores the significance of MADS-box TFs in achieving improved yields and stress resilience in agricultural contexts, positioning them as promising targets for future research in crop science. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The structure and evolution of MADS-box proteins. (<b>a</b>) Structural differences between Type I and Type II MADS-box proteins; (<b>b</b>) Protein sequences of the MADS-box domains in Type I and Type II MADS-box TFs, along with the K-domains found in Type II MADS-box TFs. The red box highlights amino acids that are completely conserved across all MADS-box domains; (<b>c</b>) Three-dimensional protein structure diagrams of the Type I and Type II MADS-box domains, as well as the K-domain; (<b>d</b>) Distribution of MADS-box family genes in 17 Plantae species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on NCBI taxonomy browser. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/CommonTree/wwwcmt.cgi" target="_blank">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/CommonTree/wwwcmt.cgi</a> (accessed on 20 October 2024) and MEGA version 11, with <span class="html-italic">Physcomitrium patens</span> serving as an outgroup. The blue sections represent dicotyledonous plants, the orange sections represent monocotyledonous plants, and the green sections indicate the confidence levels of the evolutionary branches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Regulatory mechanisms of MADS-box genes in various plant species during developmental processes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>MADS-box genes are involved in abiotic stress response in different developmental processes in several plants.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2102 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Genomic Selection Methods to Improve Prediction Accuracy of Sugarcane Single-Stalk Weight
by Zihao Wang, Chengcai Xia, Yanjie Lu, Qi Liu, Meiling Zou, Fenggang Zan and Zhiqiang Xia
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2842; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122842 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 378
Abstract
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids), serving as a vital sugar and energy crop, holds immense development potential on a global scale. In the process of sugarcane breeding and variety improvement, single-stalk weight stands as a crucial selection criterion. By cultivating sugarcane varieties with [...] Read more.
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids), serving as a vital sugar and energy crop, holds immense development potential on a global scale. In the process of sugarcane breeding and variety improvement, single-stalk weight stands as a crucial selection criterion. By cultivating sugarcane varieties with heavier single stalks, robust growth, high yields, and superior quality, the planting efficiency and market competitiveness of sugarcane can be further enhanced. Single-stalk weight was determined by measuring individual stalks three times in the field, calculating the average value as the phenotypic expression. The distribution of single-stalk weights in the orthogonal and reciprocal populations revealed coefficients of variation of 19.3% and 17.7%, respectively, with the reciprocal population showing greater genetic stability. After rigorous filtering of Hyper_seq_FD sequencing data from 409 sugarcane samples, we identified 31,204 high-quality single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) evenly distributed across all 32 chromosomes, providing a comprehensive representation of the sugarcane genome. In this study, we evaluated the predictive performance of various genomic selection (GS) methods for single-stalk weight in the 299 orthogonal population, with the male parent being GZ_73-204 and the female parent being GZ_P72-1210, and in the 108 reciprocal population, with the male parent being GZ_P72-1210 and the female parent being GZ_73-204. Initially, we compared the performance of five prediction approaches, including genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (SSBLUP), Bayes A, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) approaches. The results showed that the GBLUP model had the highest prediction accuracy, at 0.35, while the deep learning model had the lowest accuracy, at 0.20. To improve prediction accuracy, we assigned different scores to various regions of the sugarcane genome based on gene annotation information, thereby giving different weights to SNPs located in these regions. Additionally, we incorporated inbred and outbred populations as fixed effects into the model. The optimized SSBLUP model achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.44, which was a 17% improvement over the original SSBLUP model and a 9% increase compared to the originally optimal GBLUP model. The research results indicate that it is crucial to fully consider genomic structural regions, population structure characteristics, and fixed effects in GS predictions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of SSW in orthogonal and reciprocal populations from 2021 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SNP density distribution map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>GS prediction for single-stalk weight. (<b>A</b>) Performance comparison of five original GS models. (<b>B</b>) Performance comparison between weighted and unweighted relationship matrices. (<b>C</b>) Performance comparison of fixed-effect models for orthogonal and reciprocal crosses. GBLUP_W: GBLUP with weights assigned to SNPs based on their genomic regions. GBLUP_F: GBLUP incorporating fixed effects for crosses (orthogonal and reciprocal populations). GBLUP_F_W: GBLUP with both weighted SNPs and fixed effects for crosses. SSBLUP_W: SSBLUP with weights assigned to SNPs based on their genomic regions. SSBLUP_F: SSBLUP incorporating fixed effects for crosses (orthogonal and reciprocal populations). SSBLUP_W: SSBLUP with weights assigned to SNPs based on their genomic regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of sugarcane genome scoring and weighting. (<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of sugarcane gene structure scoring. (<b>B</b>) Schematic diagram of SNP weights in the traditional GBLUP model. (<b>C</b>) Schematic diagram of SNP weight after scoring.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8779 KiB  
Article
Customized Weighted Ensemble of Modified Transfer Learning Models for the Detection of Sugarcane Leaf Diseases
by Kaiwen Hu, Honghui Li, Xueliang Fu and Shuncheng Zhou
Electronics 2024, 13(23), 4715; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234715 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 433
Abstract
Sugarcane is the primary crop in the global sugar industry, yet it remains highly susceptible to a wide range of diseases that significantly impact its yield and quality. An effective solution is required to address the issues caused by the manual identification of [...] Read more.
Sugarcane is the primary crop in the global sugar industry, yet it remains highly susceptible to a wide range of diseases that significantly impact its yield and quality. An effective solution is required to address the issues caused by the manual identification of plant diseases, which is time-consuming and has low detection accuracy. This paper proposes the development of a robust Deep Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network (DECNN) model for the accurate detection of sugarcane leaf diseases. Initially, several transfer learning (TL) models, including EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, DenseNet121, NASNetMobile, and EfficientNetV2B0, were enhanced through the addition of specific layers. A comparative analysis was then conducted on the enlarged dataset of sugarcane leaf diseases, which was divided into six categories and 4800 images. The application of data augmentation, along with the addition of dense layers, batch normalization layers, and dropout layers, led to improved detection accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores for each model. Among the five enhanced transfer learning models, the modified EfficientNetB0 model demonstrated the highest detection accuracy, ranging from 97.08% to 98.54%. In conclusion, the DECNN model was developed by integrating the modified EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, and DenseNet121 models using a distinctive performance-based custom-weighted ensemble method, with weight optimization carried out using the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) technique. This resulted in a model that achieved a detection accuracy of 99.17%, which outperformed the individual performance of the modified EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, and DenseNet121 models in detecting sugarcane leaf diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Some examples of sugarcane diseases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow diagram of the proposed DECNN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The concept of transfer learning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Proposed DECNN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Accuracies of the modified models versus the number of epochs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>ROC curves of modified TL models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Confusion matrices of the modified TL models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ROC curves and confusion matrix of proposed the DECNN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Final predicted outputs.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5373 KiB  
Article
Cladophialophora guangxiense sp. nov., a New Species of Dark Septate Endophyte, Mitigates Tomato Bacterial Wilt and Growth Promotion Activities
by Xihong Wei, Yanyan Long, Yanlu Chen, Stanley Nyenje Mataka, Xue Jiang, Yi Zhou, Zhengxiang Sun and Ling Xie
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2771; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122771 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 630
Abstract
Bacterial wilt of tomatoes, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, is a significant soilborne disease that often causes significant reductions in the yield of tomatoes. Dark septate endophytic fungi (DSE) represent potential biocontrol agents against plant pathogens that can also enhance plant growth. To collect [...] Read more.
Bacterial wilt of tomatoes, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, is a significant soilborne disease that often causes significant reductions in the yield of tomatoes. Dark septate endophytic fungi (DSE) represent potential biocontrol agents against plant pathogens that can also enhance plant growth. To collect DSE fungi with potential for biocontrol, the fungus Cladophialophora guangxiense HX2 was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of sugarcane in Hengzhou Guangxi Province, China, and a novel species of Cladophialophora was identified based on morphological properties and DNA sequence analysis. C. guangxiense HX2 demonstrated a controlling effect of 76.7% on tomato bacterial wilt and promoted a 0.5-fold increase in tomato seedling height. It colonized tomato seedling roots, enhancing the activity of antioxidant and defensive enzyme systems. Transcriptomic and qPCR approaches were used to study the induction response of the strain HX2 infection by comparing the gene expression profiles. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome (KEGG) pathway enrichment revealed that tomatoes can produce salicylic acid metabolism, ethylene-activated signaling, photosynthesis, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis to the strain HX2 infection. The expression of IAA4 (3.5-fold change), ERF1 (3.5-fold change), and Hqt (1.5-fold change) was substantially enhanced and Hsc 70 (0.5-fold change) was significantly reduced in the treatment group. This study provides a theoretical foundation for further investigation into the potential of C. guangxiense HX2 as a biological agent for the prevention and control of tomato bacterial wilt. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Tomato–HX2 (<span class="html-italic">C. guangxiense</span>) symbiont. (<b>a</b>): Co-culture results of strain HX2 and tomato seedlings. (<b>b</b>): Tomato seedling dry weight. CK: Tomato cultured on PDA; HX2: Tomato treated with strain HX2. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Columns marked with the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Morphology of endophytic fungi <span class="html-italic">Cladophialophora guangxiense</span> HX2. (<b>a</b>): Colony on CMMY after 2 weeks at 28 °C. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>): Lateral conidiogenous cells and oval conidial chains on OMA after 3 weeks at 28 °C. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>): Curled string of sausage-shaped conidial chains on OMA after 3 weeks at 28 °C. (<b>g</b>): Cylindrical to sub-cylindrical conidial chains on OMA after 3 weeks at 28 °C. (<b>h</b>): Solitary conidiophores and oval conidial chains on OMA after 3 weeks at 28 °C. (<b>i</b>): Budding cells on OMA after 3 weeks at 28 °C. Scale bars 20 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>NJ phylogenetic tree based on the combined sequences ITS+LSU+SSU of <span class="html-italic">Cladophialophora</span> species. Bootstrap values &gt; 50% are shown at nodes. <span class="html-italic">Cyphellophora reptans</span> CBS 113.85 was used as an outgroup. T: type strain. The isolated strain of this study is indicated in bold. The bar indicates 0.02 nucleotide substitutions per site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effect of spore suspension from strain HX2 at different concentrations on tomato growth parameters. This figure illustrates the differences in root length plant height and stem diameter between the treated and control groups. C1: 1 × 10<sup>8</sup> spores/ mL spore suspension of strain HX2 C2: 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> spores/mL spore suspension of strain HX2 C3: 1 × 10<sup>4</sup> spores/mL spore suspension of strain HX2 ck: H<sub>2</sub>O. (<b>A</b>): Potted Plant Experiment. (<b>B</b>): Root length. (<b>C</b>): Plant height. (<b>D</b>): Stem diameter. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Columns marked with the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of HX2 on the control of <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span> in tomatoes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">C. guangxiense</span> HX2 colonized in the roots of tomato seedlings. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>): the colonization of endophytic fungal within the tomato root tissue was observed using an Olympus BX53 microscope, following staining with lactic acid cotton blue. Intracellular (black arrows) and intercellular (red arrows) colonization of hyphae.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of strain HX2 on activities of antioxidant and defense−related enzymes in leaves of tomato plants. Antioxidant enzymes including phenylalanine ammonia−lyase (PAL) (<b>A</b>), peroxidase (POD) (<b>B</b>), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (<b>C</b>). Defense−related enzymes including polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (<b>D</b>) and catalase (CAT) (<b>E</b>). CK: sterile water. T1: HX2; T2: HX2+ <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>; T3: Thiediazole copper + <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>; T4: <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum.</span> Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>DEG analyses of tomatoes with HX2 vs. PDA inoculation. (<b>a</b>): The module clusters and their relationships. (<b>b</b>): Volcano plots (the abscissa indicates the multiple changes of gene expression in different samples (log2FoldChange), and the ordinate indicates the significant level of expression difference (−log10padj); upregulated genes are represented by red dots and downregulated genes by blue dots). (<b>c</b>): Gene Ontology (GO) annotation category statistics. (<b>d</b>): Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway classification statistic. ((<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): The abscissa is the Term, and the ordinate is the number of genes annotated to the Term).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>DEG analyses of tomatoes with HX2 vs. PDA inoculation. (<b>a</b>): The module clusters and their relationships. (<b>b</b>): Volcano plots (the abscissa indicates the multiple changes of gene expression in different samples (log2FoldChange), and the ordinate indicates the significant level of expression difference (−log10padj); upregulated genes are represented by red dots and downregulated genes by blue dots). (<b>c</b>): Gene Ontology (GO) annotation category statistics. (<b>d</b>): Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway classification statistic. ((<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): The abscissa is the Term, and the ordinate is the number of genes annotated to the Term).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Enrichment analysis of tomatoes with HX2 vs. PDA inoculation. (<b>a</b>): Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. (<b>b</b>): Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. Circle size represents the number of enriched genes. The X axis displays the enrichment factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The effect of strain HX2 on the expression level of disease-resistant and pathogenic genes by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR analysis. Relative expression levels of (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">IAA</span>4, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">ERF</span>1, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Hqt</span>, and (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">Hsc</span>70 in the root of tomatoes through treatment with strain HX2 and sterile water (CK). Error bars represent mean standard deviation of triplicate experiments. ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3863 KiB  
Article
Effects of Potassium Fertilizer on Sugarcane Yields and Plant and Soil Potassium Levels in Louisiana
by Richard M. Johnson, Katie A. Richard and Quentin D. Read
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2761; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122761 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 405
Abstract
The influence of potassium fertilizer on sugarcane (interspecific hybrids of Saccharum Spp.) yields and leaf and soil potassium levels was evaluated at six locations in Louisiana. The objective of this study was to determine if the sugarcane yields in Louisiana could be improved [...] Read more.
The influence of potassium fertilizer on sugarcane (interspecific hybrids of Saccharum Spp.) yields and leaf and soil potassium levels was evaluated at six locations in Louisiana. The objective of this study was to determine if the sugarcane yields in Louisiana could be improved with potassium application. Different rates of potassium fertilizer (0–179 kg K2O ha−1) were applied to plant cane and ratoon sugarcane fields in Louisiana. Soil samples and sugarcane leaf samples were also collected from all experiments. Yield data were collected by harvesting plots with a single row, chopper harvester and a field transport wagon equipped with electronic load sensors. At all locations and soil types, potassium fertilizer did not increase cane or sugar yields. Soil properties data showed that significant increases in soil potassium levels did not occur until the second ratoon crop, where soil potassium increased by 30% for the high rate. Increases in plant potassium were also not observed until the second ratoon crop, where plant potassium increased by 10.5% for the high rate. The potential cause of the observed lack of response may be explained by interference from calcium and magnesium, combined with fixation by smectite and vermiculite clay minerals. Our soil and plant uptake data would suggest that repeated K applications at recommended rates, which currently vary from 90 to 157 kg ha−1, may be required to achieve the potential benefits of K fertilizer in Louisiana sugarcane soils. However, this must be verified by additional on-farm trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Estimated marginal trends of potash addition on cane yields for the overall trend (<b>A</b>) and the two-way interactions of potash addition with crop year (<b>B</b>), soil type (<b>C</b>), and variety (<b>D</b>). All treatments were replicated six times and data were subjected to analysis of variance. Means at each potash addition level are shown and error bars indicate standard errors of the means. No slopes are significantly different from zero.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Estimated marginal trends of potash addition on TRS (theoretically recoverable sugar) for the overall trend (<b>A</b>) and the two-way interactions of potash addition with crop year (<b>B</b>), soil type (<b>C</b>), and variety (<b>D</b>). All treatments were replicated six times and data were subjected to analysis of variance. Means at each potash addition level area shown and error bars indicate standard errors of the means. No slopes are significantly different from zero.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Estimated marginal trends of potash addition on sugar yield for the overall trend (<b>A</b>) and the two-way interactions of potash addition with crop year (<b>B</b>), soil type (<b>C</b>), and variety (<b>D</b>). All treatments were replicated six times and data were subjected to analysis of variance. Means at each potash addition level are shown and error bars indicate standard errors of the means. No slopes are significantly different from zero.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Estimated marginal trends of potash addition on plant leaf potassium for the overall trend (<b>A</b>) and the two-way interactions of potash addition with crop year (<b>B</b>), soil type (<b>C</b>), and variety (<b>D</b>). All treatments were replicated six times and data were subjected to analysis of variance. Means at each potash addition level area shown and error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Slopes significantly different from zero are shown as thick solid lines, while slopes not significantly different from zero are shown as thin dashed lines. The overall effect of potash addition on leaf K was significant (t520 = 3.65, <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.0003), (<b>A</b>). The effect of potash addition on leaf K in second ratoon was also significant (t520 = 4.70, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001), (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Estimated marginal trends of potash addition on soil potassium for the overall trend (<b>A</b>) and the two-way interactions of potash addition with crop year (<b>B</b>), soil type (<b>C</b>), and variety (<b>D</b>). All treatments were replicated six times and data were subjected to analysis of variance. Means at each potash addition level are shown and error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Slopes significantly different from zero are shown as thick solid lines, while slopes not significantly different from zero are shown as thin dashed lines. The overall effect of potash addition on soil K was significant (: t569 = 4.53, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.00010 (<b>A</b>). The effect of potash addition on soil K in second ratoon was significant (: t569 = 6.68, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001) (<b>B</b>). The effect of potash addition in light soil was significant (t569 = 5.23, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001) (<b>C</b>). The effect of potash addition on soil K in variety L 01-299 was significant (t569 = 4.38, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001) (<b>D</b>).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2159 KiB  
Article
Effects of Sugarcane/Peanut Intercropping on Root Exudates and Rhizosphere Soil Nutrient
by Xiumei Tang, Lulu Liao, Haining Wu, Jun Xiong, Zhong Li, Zhipeng Huang, Liangqiong He, Jing Jiang, Ruichun Zhong, Zhuqiang Han and Ronghua Tang
Plants 2024, 13(22), 3257; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13223257 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 586
Abstract
Intercropping can enable more efficient resource use and increase yield. Most current studies focus on the correlation between soil nutrients and crop yield under intercropping conditions. However, the mechanisms related to root exudates and soil nutrients remain unclear. Therefore, this study explored the [...] Read more.
Intercropping can enable more efficient resource use and increase yield. Most current studies focus on the correlation between soil nutrients and crop yield under intercropping conditions. However, the mechanisms related to root exudates and soil nutrients remain unclear. Therefore, this study explored the correlation between rhizosphere soil nutrients and root exudates in sugarcane/peanut intercropping. Root extracts, root exudates, rhizosphere soil enzyme activities, and soil nutrients were analyzed and compared in monocultured and intercropped peanut and sugarcane at different growth stages. The root metabolites were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways to further identify the connection between soil nutrients and root exudates. The effects of intercropping differed in peanut and sugarcane at different growth stages, and the difference between podding and pod-filling stages was significant. Intercropping generally had a great effect on peanut; it not only significantly increased the organic acid, soluble sugars, and phenolic acids in root exudates and extracts from peanuts, but also significantly increased rhizosphere soil enzyme activities and soil nutrient levels. Intercropping peanuts promoted fumaric acid secretion from roots and significantly affected the metabolic pathways of alanine, aspartate, and glutamate. Sugarcane/peanut intercropping can increase root exudates and effectively improve soil nutrients. The changes in soil nutrients are closely related to the effects of fumaric acid on alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant–Soil Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on organic acids. (<b>a</b>) represents the change of organic acids in root extract under intercropping conditions, (<b>b</b>) represents the change of organic acids in root exudate under intercropping. Note: Different letters in the bar chart indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), the same below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effect of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on soluble sugar content. (<b>a</b>) shows the change of soluble sugar in root extract under intercropping conditions, (<b>b</b>) shows the change of soluble sugar in root exudate under intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on amino acids. (<b>a</b>) shows the change of amino acid in root extract under intercropping conditions, (<b>b</b>) shows the change of amino acid in root exudate under intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on phenolic acids. (<b>a</b>) shows the change of phenolic acid in root extract under intercropping conditions, (<b>b</b>) shows the change of phenolic acid in root exudate under intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on differential metabolites. Note: (<b>a</b>) shows the metabolites detected in monoculture peanut, intercrop peanut, monoculture sugarcane and intercrop sugarcane. (<b>b</b>) shows the trend and degree of difference of metabolites between MP and IP, (<b>c</b>) shows the trend and degree of difference of metabolites between MS and IS. In (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), the horizontal coordinate is the converted Z-score value of the relative content of metabolites in the sale, the vertical coordinate is the name of metabolites, and the color of the points represents different groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on metabolic pathways. (<b>a</b>) shows enrichment of MP and IP metabolic pathways, (<b>b</b>) shows enrichment of MS and IS metabolic pathways. Note: the horizontal coordinate represents the Impact value that is enriched into different metabolic pathways, the vertical coordinate represents the metabolic pathway, and the number represents the corresponding number of metabolites on the pathway. Impact is the influence value of metabolic pathway, and the larger the impact of differential metabolites on the target pathway is. Color is correlated with the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, the redder the color, the smaller the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, the bluer the color, the larger the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, and the smaller the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, which means that the different metabolites have a more significant impact on this pathway.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Correlation analysis of different metabolism and rhizosphere soil nutrients and enzyme activities of monoculture peanut and intercropping peanut.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5131 KiB  
Article
Agronomic Performance and Technological Attributes of Sugarcane Cultivars Under Split-Irrigation Management
by Henrique Fonseca Elias de Oliveira, Fernando Henrique Arriel, Frederico Antônio Loureiro Soares, Edson Cabral da Silva, Marcio Mesquita, Thiago Dias Silva, Jhon Lennon Bezerra da Silva, Cleiton Mateus Sousa, Marcos Vinícius da Silva, Ailton Alves de Carvalho and Thieres George Freire da Silva
AgriEngineering 2024, 6(4), 4337-4352; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6040245 - 18 Nov 2024
Viewed by 621
Abstract
In addition to being an important instrument in the search for increasingly greater productivity, agricultural production with adequate use of irrigation systems significantly minimizes the impact on water resources. To meet high productivity and yield, as well as industrial quality, a series of [...] Read more.
In addition to being an important instrument in the search for increasingly greater productivity, agricultural production with adequate use of irrigation systems significantly minimizes the impact on water resources. To meet high productivity and yield, as well as industrial quality, a series of studies on sugarcane cultivation are necessary. Despite being able to adapt to drought, sugarcane is still a crop highly dependent on irrigation to guarantee the best quality standards. Our study aimed to analyze the agronomic performance and technological attributes of two sugarcane cultivars, evaluating the vegetative and productive pattern, as well as the industrial quality of the cultivars RB92579 and SP80–1816, which were cultivated under split-irrigation management in the Sugarcane Research Unit of IF Goiano—Campus Ceres, located in the state of Goiás in the Central-West region of Brazil. A self-propelled sprinkler irrigation system (IrrigaBrasil) was used, duly equipped with Twin 120 Komet sprinklers (Fremon, USA). The cultivars were propagated vegetatively and planted in 0.25 m deep furrows with 1.5 m between rows. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD), with a bifactorial split-plot scheme (5 × 2), with four replications, where the experimental plots were subjected to one of the following five split-irrigation management systems: 00 mm + 00 mm; 20 mm + 40 mm; 30 mm + 30 mm; 40 mm + 20 mm; or 60 mm + 00 mm. At 60 and 150 days after planting (DAP), the following respective irrigation management systems were applied: 00 mm + 00 mm and 20 mm + 40 mm. Biometric and technological attributes, such as plant height (PH) and stem diameter (SD), were evaluated in this case at 30-day intervals, starting at 180 DAP and ending at 420 DAP. Measurements of soluble solids content (°Brix), apparent sucrose content (POL), fiber content (Fiber), juice purity (PZA), broth POL (BP), reducing sugars (RS), and total recoverable sugars (TRS) were made by sampling stems at harvest at 420 DAP. RB92579 showed total recoverable sugar contents 11.89% and 8.86% higher than those recorded for SP80–1816 under split-irrigation with 40 mm + 20 mm and 60 mm + 00 mm, respectively. Shoot productivity of RB92579 reached 187.15 t ha−1 under split-irrigation with 60 mm + 00 mm, which was 42.16% higher than the shoot productivity observed for SP80–1816. Both cultivars showed higher qualitative and quantitative indices in treatments that applied higher volumes of water in the initial phase of the culture, coinciding with the dry season. Sugarcane cultivar RB92579 showed a better adaptation to the prevailing conditions in the study than the SP80–1816 cultivar. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Irrigation Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spatial location of the Sugarcane Research Unit (<b>d</b>) in Ceres County (<b>c</b>) in the state of Goiás (<b>b</b>), Central-West region of Brazil (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Meteorological data on air temperature: minimum (Tmin, °C), maximum (Tmax, °C), and average (Tmed, °C); rainfall (<b>a</b>); and relative air humidity: minimum and maximum (<b>b</b>) throughout the experimental period from the Sugarcane Research Unit.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2771 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Omega-3 Lipid Production from Agro-Industrial By-Products Using Thraustochytrids: Enabling Process Development, Optimization, and Scale-Up
by Guilherme Anacleto dos Reis, Brigitte Sthepani Orozco Colonia, Walter Jose Martínez-Burgos, Diego Ocán-Torres, Cristine Rodrigues, Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira and Carlos Ricardo Soccol
Foods 2024, 13(22), 3646; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223646 - 16 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1210
Abstract
Thraustochytrids are emerging as a valuable biomass source for high-quality omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), crucial for both human and animal nutrition. This research focuses on cultivating Schizochytrium limacinum SR21 using cost-effective agro-industrial by-products, namely sugarcane molasses (SCM), corn steep liquor (CSL), and [...] Read more.
Thraustochytrids are emerging as a valuable biomass source for high-quality omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), crucial for both human and animal nutrition. This research focuses on cultivating Schizochytrium limacinum SR21 using cost-effective agro-industrial by-products, namely sugarcane molasses (SCM), corn steep liquor (CSL), and residual yeast cream (RYC), to optimize biomass and lipid production through a comprehensive multistep bioprocess. The study involved optimization experiments in shake flasks and stirred-tank bioreactors, where we evaluated biomass, lipid content, and DHA yields. Shake flask optimization resulted in significant enhancements in biomass, lipid content, and lipid production by factors of 1.12, 1.72, and 1.92, respectively. In a 10 L stirred-tank bioreactor, biomass surged to 39.29 g/L, lipid concentration increased to 14.98 g/L, and DHA levels reached an impressive 32.83%. The optimal concentrations identified were 66 g/L of SCM, 24.5 g/L of CSL, and 6 g/L of RYC, achieving a desirability index of 0.87, aimed at maximizing biomass and lipid production. This study shows that agro-industrial by-products can be effective and low-cost substrates for producing lipids using thraustochytrids, offering a sustainable option for omega-3 PUFA production. The findings support future improvements in bioprocesses and potential uses of thraustochytrid biomass in food fortification, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, and as vegan omega-3 sources. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Pareto chart shows standardized effects and compares predicted vs. observed values in the central composite design (CCD) for biomass and lipid production, using a 5% confidence level (blue dotted line) and prediction level (red dotted line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Prediction profiler and desirability for optimization of multiple responses Y1: Biomass (g/L), Y2: Lipid content (%), and Y3: Lipids (g/L).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Response surfaces from CCD 23 regression models optimize bioprocess using sugarcane molasses (66 g/L), corn steep liquor (24.5 g/L), and residual yeast cream (6 g/L) based on predictions and desirability profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Batch kinetic curves of a bioprocess using thraustochytrid and agro-industrial by-products as substrate include: (<b>A</b>) Scale-up in a stirred-tank bioreactor (STBR). (<b>B</b>) 250 mL shake flask. (<b>C</b>) Logarithmic cell growth (Ln X). (<b>D</b>) Substrate consumption rate (Qs) and product formation rate (Qp). (<b>E</b>) Yield evolution curves for changes in biomass (ΔX), product (ΔP), and substrate (ΔS) in a 10 L STBR. (<b>F</b>) Yield evolution curves for changes in the same parameters in a 250 mL shake flask. The standard deviations depicted in <a href="#foods-13-03646-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>B were so minute that they were undetectable within the confines of the image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The objective of this study is to employ gas chromatography spectroscopy to identify the specific fatty acids present in the biomass. As can be observed, the four most prominent peaks represent pentadecanoic (11.54%), hexadecanoic (34.28%), heptadecanoic (7.34%), and docosahexaenoic (36.65%) fatty acids.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 2743 KiB  
Article
Production of Xylitol and Ethanol from Agricultural Wastes and Biotransformation of Phenylacetylcarbinol in Deep Eutectic Solvent
by Su Lwin Htike, Julaluk Khemacheewakul, Charin Techapun, Yuthana Phimolsiripol, Pornchai Rachtanapun, Suphat Phongthai, Worasit Tochampa, Siraphat Taesuwan, Kittisak Jantanasakulwong, Kritsadaporn Porninta, Sumeth Sommanee, Chatchadaporn Mahakuntha, Juan Feng, Anbarasu Kumar, Xinshu Zhuang, Wen Wang, Wei Qi, Rojarej Nunta and Noppol Leksawasdi
Agriculture 2024, 14(11), 2043; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14112043 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 744
Abstract
Converting agricultural biomass wastes into bio-chemicals can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions and foster global initiatives towards mitigating climate change. This study examined the co-production of xylitol and ethanol from xylose and glucose-rich hydrolysates of corn cob (CC), sugarcane bagasse (SCB), and rice [...] Read more.
Converting agricultural biomass wastes into bio-chemicals can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions and foster global initiatives towards mitigating climate change. This study examined the co-production of xylitol and ethanol from xylose and glucose-rich hydrolysates of corn cob (CC), sugarcane bagasse (SCB), and rice straw (RS) without prior detoxification, using C. magnoliae (C. mag), C. tropicalis (C. trop), and C. guilliermondii (C. guil). A score ranking system based on weighted yields and productivity assessed the best raw material and yeast strain combination. The study revealed that C. mag cultivated on RS hemicellulosic and CC cellulosic media exhibited statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) superiority in xylitol (272 ± 5) and ethanol 273 ± 3, production. The single-phase emulsion system using frozen-thawed whole cells of CC—C. mag, CC—C. trop, and RS—C. guil was utilized for phenylacetylcarbinol (PAC) biotransformation. Although similar PAC concentration within 14.4–14.7 mM was obtained, the statistically significant higher (p ≤ 0.05) volumetric pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) activity from C. mag at 360 min was observed by 28.3 ± 1.51%. Consequently, further utilization of CC—C. mag in a two-phase emulsion system (Pi buffer: vegetable oil (Vg. oil) and Pi buffer: deep eutectic solvents (DES)) revealed that Pi buffer: DES medium preserved volumetric PDC activity (54.0 ± 1.2%) statistically significant higher (p ≤ 0.05) than the Pi buffer: Vg. oil system (34.3 ± 1.3%), with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in [PAC]. These findings outlined the sustainable pioneering approach for the co-production of chemicals and reusing the residual yeast cells for PAC biotransformation in the Pi buffer: DES system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental workflow for preparation of hydrolysates from corn cob (CC), rice straw (RS), and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) for xylitol, ethanol, and PAC production.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cultivation kinetics profiles of <span class="html-italic">C. mag</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. trop,</span> and <span class="html-italic">C. guil</span> on (<b>a</b>) corn cob (CC), (<b>b</b>) rice straw (RS), and (<b>c</b>) sugarcane bagasse (SCB) hemicellulosic hydrolysates for xylitol production. The standard errors in all cases were either within the sensitivity limit of detection procedures or less than 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cultivation kinetics profiles of <span class="html-italic">C. mag</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. trop</span>, and <span class="html-italic">C. guil</span> on (<b>a</b>) corn cob (CC), (<b>b</b>) rice straw (RS), and (<b>c</b>) sugarcane bagasse (SCB) cellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. The standard errors in all cases were either within the sensitivity limit of detection procedures or less than 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Kinetic profiles of substrate utilization and product/by-product formation during PAC biotransformation: (<b>a</b>) frozen-thawed whole cells of <span class="html-italic">C. mag</span>, (<b>b</b>) frozen-thawed whole cells of <span class="html-italic">C. trop</span>, and (<b>c</b>) frozen-thawed whole cells of <span class="html-italic">C. guil</span>. The standard errors in all cases were either within the sensitivity limit of detection procedures or less than 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of PAC production and volumetric PDC activity in Pi buffer: Vg. oil and Pi buffer: DES system. The standard errors in all cases were either within the sensitivity limit of detection procedures or less than 5%.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3270 KiB  
Article
Effect of Conservation Management on Oxisol in a Sugarcane Area Under a Pre-Sprouted Seedling System
by Ingrid Nehmi de Oliveira, Zigomar Menezes de Souza, Denizart Bolonhezi, Rose Luiza Moraes Tavares, Renato Paiva de Lima, Reginaldo Barboza da Silva, Fernando Silva Araújo, Lenon Henrique Lovera and Elizeu de Souza Lima
Agriculture 2024, 14(11), 1965; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111965 - 1 Nov 2024
Viewed by 648
Abstract
Conservation soil management, such as no-tillage and Rip Strip®, can be developed as an alternative to degradation processes such as compaction. This study aimed to compare conventional and conservation soil tillage regarding their soil physical attributes, root system, and stalk yield [...] Read more.
Conservation soil management, such as no-tillage and Rip Strip®, can be developed as an alternative to degradation processes such as compaction. This study aimed to compare conventional and conservation soil tillage regarding their soil physical attributes, root system, and stalk yield for two years. The experiment was conducted on the premises of Fazenda Cresciúma in an area of Typic Eutrudox in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil, with an experimental design in random blocks. The treatments evaluated for the transplanted sugarcane were as follows: CT—conventional tillage with disk harrow; CTS—conventional tillage with disk harrow and subsoiling; MT—minimum tillage with Rip Strip®; NT—no-tillage. The variables evaluated were dry root mass, soil bulk density (Bd), total porosity (TP), and stalk yield for sugarcane plant and first ratoon harvest. The results allowed us to observe that CT was the system that most reduced the TP (varying 0.44–0.47 m3 m−3), while MT was the one that presented fewer changes (TP varying 0.47–0.51 m3 m−3). NT obtained the highest stalk yield (123 Mg ha−1) in the sugarcane plant cycle and greater amounts of roots in depths below 0.80 m. Conservation tillage by Rip Strip® proved to be a viable system for use in sugarcane because it provides greater dry root mass on the surface and maintenance of physical attributes compared to conventional tillage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the sugarcane experimental area in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. (<b>A</b>) = sketch of the experimental area; (<b>B</b>) = arrangement of treatments in the experimental area. CT = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow; CTS = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow and subsoiling; MT = sugarcane transplanted with minimum tillage with Rip Strip<sup>®</sup>; NT = sugarcane transplanted with no-tillage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Precipitation (mm) and maximum and minimum temperatures in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chronology of the execution of the experiment in the study area of Fazenda Cresciúma, in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Adapted from [<a href="#B18-agriculture-14-01965" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Location of collection points in the experimental area located in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. PR = planting row, BR = bed row, and IR= inter-row.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Degree of compaction (%) of soil samples with a preserved Eutrudox structure during three soil collections for the sugarcane area in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. CT = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow; CTS = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow and subsoiling; MT = sugarcane transplanted with minimum tillage with Rip Strip<sup>®</sup>; NT = sugarcane transplanted with no-tillage. Different letters indicate significant differences between soil tillage methods with a 5% probability by Tukey’s test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Dry root biomass in soil depth ranging from 0.00 to 0.80 m (<b>A</b>) and 0.80 to 1.0 m (<b>B</b>) during four collections in a sugarcane area in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. CT = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow; CTS = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow and subsoiling; MT = sugarcane transplanted with minimum tillage with Rip Strip<sup>®</sup>; NT = sugarcane transplanted with no-tillage. The letters mean that the means differed from each other with 5% probability by Tukey’s test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05); ns: not significant for each evaluated period. The *, ** means regression test significance at 5 and 1% probability, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Stalk yield for the sugarcane plant cycle (2018) and first ratoon cycle (2019) for the sugarcane area in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. CT = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow; CTS = sugarcane transplanted with conventional tillage with disk harrow and subsoiling; MT = sugarcane transplanted with minimum tillage with Rip Strip<sup>®</sup>; NT = sugarcane transplanted with no-tillage. The letters mean that the means differed from each other with 5% probability by Tukey’s test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05); the uppercase letters differ between collections (2018 vs. 2019) and the lowercase letters between tillage systems within the same samples collection.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6890 KiB  
Article
Water Use Efficiency Characteristics and Their Contributions to Yield in Diverse Sugarcane Genotypes with Varying Drought Resistance Levels Under Different Field Irrigation Conditions
by Jidapa Khonghintaisong, Anocha Onkaeo, Patcharin Songsri and Nakorn Jongrungklang
Agriculture 2024, 14(11), 1952; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111952 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 777
Abstract
Drought is the major abiotic constraint affecting sugarcane productivity and quality worldwide. This obstacle may be alleviated through sugarcane genotypes demonstrating good water use efficiency (WUE) performance. This study aims to investigate the WUE characteristics of various sugarcane genotypes under different soil water [...] Read more.
Drought is the major abiotic constraint affecting sugarcane productivity and quality worldwide. This obstacle may be alleviated through sugarcane genotypes demonstrating good water use efficiency (WUE) performance. This study aims to investigate the WUE characteristics of various sugarcane genotypes under different soil water availability levels. Plant and ratoon field experiments were conducted using a split-plot randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots were assigned three types of irrigation: (1) rainfed conditions (RF), (2) field capacity conditions (FC), and (3) half-available water (½ AW). The subplots consisted of six sugarcane genotypes with varying levels of drought resistance, i.e., KK3, UT13, Kps01-12, KKU99-03, KKU99-02, and UT12. Data on yield, stalk numbers, stalk diameter, height, and WUE were collected throughout the crop cycle for both plant and ratoon crops. For the plant crop, the net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and leaf area index (LAI) were recorded during the crop period. In both plant and ratoon crops, the WUE in the RF treatment was lower than in the FC and ½ AW treatments during the drought stress period 4 months after planting (MAP). In the recovery phase, the WUE in the ½ AW treatment fell between the FC and RF treatments. The RF treatment exhibited the lowest WUE compared to the other two water regime treatments at the maturity stage. The drought-resistant genotypes KK3 and UT13 maintained high WUE values throughout both the drought and recovery periods and exhibited outstanding LAIs at 4 and 6 MAP. A significant relationship existed between WUE and LAI during these periods. Moreover, WUE was positively correlated with cane yields and yield components, such as stalk weight, shoot diameter, and height, during recovery and tiller number and height during ripening. Therefore, WUE and LAI are efficient parameters for supporting and maintaining growth and yield during water deficit and recovery phases under rainfed conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Water Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Rainfall (mm) and soil moisture content at field capacity (FC), half available water (½ AW), and rainfed (RF) conditions during plant (the 1st year trial) (<b>a</b>) and ratoon (the 2nd year trial) (<b>b</b>) crops. * G and E phases = germination and establishment phases, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Yield (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) in plant crop (<b>a</b>) and ratoon crop (<b>b</b>) of six sugarcane genotypes (KKU99-03, UT13, Kps01-12, KKU99-02, UT12, and KK3) grown under three different water regimes (field capacity (FC), half available water (½ AW), and rainfed conditions) harvested at 12 months after planting (MAP) and months after harvest (MAH). The different lowercase letters above the SE-bar at each sugarcane age indicate significant differ-ences among water regimes by LSD test at 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Water use efficiency (WUE)(g L<sup>−1</sup>) in plant crop (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and ratoon crop (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) of six sugarcane genotypes (KKU99−03, UT13, Kps01−12, KKU99−02, UT12, and KK3) grown under three different water regimes: field capacity (FC) (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>), half available water (½ AW) (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>), and rainfed conditions (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>), harvested at 12 months after planting (MAP) and months after harvest (MAH). The different lowercase letters above the SE-bar at each sugarcane age indicate significant differ-ences among water regimes by LSD test at 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photosynthetic rate (µmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−</sup>² s<sup>−</sup>¹) of six sugarcane genotypes (KKU99−03, UT13, Kps01−12, KKU99−02, UT12, and KK3) at 4, 6, 8, and 10 months after planting (MAP) grown under three different water regimes: field capacity (FC) (<b>a</b>), half available water (½ AW) (<b>b</b>), and rainfed (<b>c</b>) conditions for plant crop (the 1st year trail). The different lowercase letters above the SE-bar at each sugarcane age indicate significant differ-ences among water regimes by LSD test at 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Transpiration rate (mmol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>−</sup>² s<sup>−</sup>¹) of six sugarcane genotypes (KKU99−03, UT13, Kps01−12, KKU99−02, UT12, and KK3) at 4, 6, 8, and 10 months after planting (MAP) grown under three different water regimes: field capacity (FC) (<b>a</b>), half available water (½ AW) (<b>b</b>) and rainfed (<b>c</b>) conditions for plant crop (the 1st year trail). The different lowercase letters above the SE-bar at each sugarcane age indicate significant differ-ences among water regimes by LSD test at 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Leaf area index of six sugarcane genotypes (KKU99−03, UT13, Kps01−12, KKU99−02, UT12, and KK3) at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months after planting (MAP) grown under three different water regimes: field capacity (FC) (<b>a</b>), half available water (½ AW), (<b>b</b>) and rainfed (RF) (<b>c</b>) conditions at plant crop (the 1st year trail). The different lowercase letters above the SE-bar at each sugarcane age indicate significant differ-ences among water regimes by LSD test at 5%.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2041 KiB  
Article
Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Sugarcane Bagasse and Straw: Effect of Operational Conditions on Product Fractionation and Bio-Oil Composition
by Raquel Santos Silva, Reinaldo Alves da Silva, Flávio Montenegro de Andrade, Pedro Nunes Acácio Neto, Rayane Maria do Nascimento, Jandyson Machado Santos, Luiz Stragevitch, Maria Fernanda Pimentel, Diogo Ardaillon Simoes and Leandro Danielski
Energies 2024, 17(21), 5439; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215439 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 653
Abstract
In the energy transition process, aiming for zero disposal and clean production in the elimination of waste is crucial; consequently, agricultural residues have significant potential for reduction in the use of fossil fuels. This study investigates the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of sugarcane bagasse [...] Read more.
In the energy transition process, aiming for zero disposal and clean production in the elimination of waste is crucial; consequently, agricultural residues have significant potential for reduction in the use of fossil fuels. This study investigates the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of sugarcane bagasse (BSC) and straw (SSC), examining the products’ distribution and bio-oil composition relative to the reaction conditions. The experiments used a 23 factorial design, evaluating the temperature (300–350 °C), constant heating time (0–30 min), and the use of the K2CO3 concentration as the catalyst (0–0.5 mol/L−1). The main factor affecting the biocrude yield from BSC and SSC was the use of K2CO3. Statistically significant interaction effects were also observed. Milder conditions resulted in the highest bio-oil yields, 36% for BSC and 31% for SSC. The catalyst had no impact on the biocrude production. The bio-oils were analyzed by GC/MS and FTIR; a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate the samples’ variability. The FTIR highlighted bands associated with common oxygenated compounds in lignocellulosic biomass-derived bio-oils. The GC-MS results indicated a predominance of oxygenated compounds, and these were highest in the presence of the catalyst for both the BSC (90.6%) and SSC (91.7%) bio-oils. The SSC bio-oils presented higher oxygenated compound contents than the BSC bio-oils. Statistical analysis provided valuable insights for optimizing biomass conversion processes, such as determining the optimal conditions for maximizing product yields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A4: Bio-Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the HTL process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cube plot illustrating the impact of effects on bio-oil yield for (<b>a</b>) BSC and (<b>b</b>) SSC experiments. In blue, the mean response under each experimental condition. In parenthesis, estimated effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average yield of products and biomass conversion for BSC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average yield of products and biomass conversion for SSC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FTIR spectra from (<b>a</b>) bio-oils produced from sugarcane bagasse; (<b>b</b>) bio-oils produced from sugarcane straw; and (<b>c</b>) raw biomasses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Principal components analysis of bio-oils produced from sugarcane bagasse and straw: (<b>a</b>) scores and (<b>b</b>) loadings plots for PC1 and PC4. Dataset preprocessed with first derivative with a window size of 25 and mean center.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chemical classes of GC-MS results of BSC (<b>a</b>) and SSC (<b>b</b>) bio-oils produced from HTL at 300 °C and 0 min of constant heating time, with or without the presence of catalysts.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop