[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = seismological data centers

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
31 pages, 3131 KiB  
Review
Algorithms in Tomography and Related Inverse Problems—A Review
by Styliani Tassiopoulou, Georgia Koukiou and Vassilis Anastassopoulos
Algorithms 2024, 17(2), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/a17020071 - 5 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2698
Abstract
In the ever-evolving landscape of tomographic imaging algorithms, this literature review explores a diverse array of themes shaping the field’s progress. It encompasses foundational principles, special innovative approaches, tomographic implementation algorithms, and applications of tomography in medicine, natural sciences, remote sensing, and seismology. [...] Read more.
In the ever-evolving landscape of tomographic imaging algorithms, this literature review explores a diverse array of themes shaping the field’s progress. It encompasses foundational principles, special innovative approaches, tomographic implementation algorithms, and applications of tomography in medicine, natural sciences, remote sensing, and seismology. This choice is to show off the diversity of tomographic applications and simultaneously the new trends in tomography in recent years. Accordingly, the evaluation of backprojection methods for breast tomographic reconstruction is highlighted. After that, multi-slice fusion takes center stage, promising real-time insights into dynamic processes and advanced diagnosis. Computational efficiency, especially in methods for accelerating tomographic reconstruction algorithms on commodity PC graphics hardware, is also presented. In geophysics, a deep learning-based approach to ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data inversion propels us into the future of geological and environmental sciences. We venture into Earth sciences with global seismic tomography: the inverse problem and beyond, understanding the Earth’s subsurface through advanced inverse problem solutions and pushing boundaries. Lastly, optical coherence tomography is reviewed in basic applications for revealing tiny biological tissue structures. This review presents the main categories of applications of tomography, providing a deep insight into the methods and algorithms that have been developed so far so that the reader who wants to deal with the subject is fully informed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Featured Reviews of Algorithms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The organization of the present review paper in sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Parallel X-ray breast tomosynthesis imaging geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Projection geometry. The X-ray source projects the point A onto B (detector plane).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>This visual representation showcases the proposed innovative multi-slice fusion approach. Each CNN denoiser is designed to function within the temporal dimension and two spatial dimensions. These CNN denoisers are seamlessly integrated with the measurement model to generate a 4D reconstruction that is inherently regularized.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pipeline for rendering graphics using hardware acceleration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FWI accurately computes highly detailed, data-driven models of subsurface velocity, absorption Q, and reflectivity for use in seismic imaging and interpretation by minimizing the difference between observed and modeled seismic waveforms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>OCT simplified block diagram. The output from the super luminescent diode is coupled into a single-mode fiber and divided at a 50/50 coupler. The resulting optical signals are directed into both the sample and the reference arm. The reflections are combined at the sample coupler and subsequently detected by a photodiode. The detector output is then demodulated to generate the envelope of the interferometric signal, which is subsequently digitized and stored on a computer. This process involves a series of longitudinal scans, with the lateral beam position being translated after each longitudinal scan.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10076 KiB  
Article
Two-Dimensional Attenuation and Velocity Tomography of Iran
by Thomas M. Hearn
Geosciences 2022, 12(11), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12110397 - 26 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1777
Abstract
Seismic bulletin data collected by the Iranian Seismological Center are used to image crust and mantle seismic attenuation, group velocity, and phase velocities for Lg, Pg, Sn, and Pn phases. This is possible because the peak amplitude time is picked, and amplitude measurements [...] Read more.
Seismic bulletin data collected by the Iranian Seismological Center are used to image crust and mantle seismic attenuation, group velocity, and phase velocities for Lg, Pg, Sn, and Pn phases. This is possible because the peak amplitude time is picked, and amplitude measurements can be associated with the phase based on travel time plots. The group velocity is the apparent velocity of the maximum amplitude arrival and represents the combined effect of phase velocity and seismic scattering. Thus, it can be used in combination with the attenuation to identify where scattering attenuation is dominant. The Arabian–Iranian plate boundary separates low-velocity Zagros sediments from central Iran; however, in the mantle, it separates a high-velocity Arabian shield from central Iran. Scattering attenuation is low within the Arabian mantle and crust, and the Zagros sediments do not cause Lg or Pg attenuation. The Eocene Urumieh Dokhtar Magmatic Arc has high attenuation within both the crust and mantle, and while there is no partial melting in the crust, there may be some in the mantle. The northern Eocene Sistan Suture Zone shows particularly high attenuation that is accompanied by high scattering. It represents an incompletely closed ocean basin that has undergone intense alteration. The Alborz Mountains have high attenuation with some scattering. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methods for Exploration of the Continental Crust)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic map of Iran with major blocks noted. The main plate boundary lies between the High Zagros Block and the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone. (<b>b</b>) Red outlines are Neogene volcanics and tan outlines are Paleogene volcanics. Red stars are Holocene volcanoes. Faults from Arefifard [<a href="#B35-geosciences-12-00397" class="html-bibr">35</a>]; volcanoes and volcanic outlines from Seber et al. [<a href="#B36-geosciences-12-00397" class="html-bibr">36</a>]. AB—Alborz Belt; HZB—High Zagros Block; KD—Kopet Dagh; LB—Lut Block; PB—Posht-e-Badam Block; SB—Sabzevar Block; SSZ—Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone; SS—Sistan Suture (East Iranian Ranges); TB—Tabas Block; TQB—Tabriz-Qom Block; UDMA—Urumieh Dokhtar Magmatic Arc; YB—Yazd Block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Group travel times. Four phases are recognized and winnowed by the corresponding sectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Raw data for travel times and amplitudes. Gray data were not used in the inversion. Amplitude and group velocity data at distances greater than 200 km were used for all four phases; Sg and Pg travel time picks for distances greater than 25 km were used; Sn and Pn travel time picks for distances greater than 100 km were used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Raypaths. Drawing complete raypaths saturates the images, s only every 21st element of each raypath is plotted. While this obscures individual raypaths, it shows the coverage well. Note the lack of Sg, Lg, and Pg raypaths beneath the southern Caspian Sea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Velocities and attenuation. Top plots are the attenuation, middle plots are of group velocity, and bottom plots are of phase velocity. The color bar is stretched to produce equal contours in 1/<span class="html-italic">Q</span>. Note the reduced velocity scale for Sn phase arrivals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Checkerboard tests of velocity and attenuation. The original checkerboard had attenuation and velocity squares of two-by-two degrees. The station and event delays also alternated every two degrees. Representative noise was added. Velocity squares are ±0.2 km/s and attenuation squares are ±150.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 654 KiB  
Review
Analysis of Information Availability for Seismic and Volcanic Monitoring Systems: A Review
by Santiago Arrais, Luis Urquiza-Aguiar and Carolina Tripp-Barba
Sensors 2022, 22(14), 5186; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145186 - 11 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2727
Abstract
Organizations responsible for seismic and volcanic monitoring worldwide mainly gather information from instrumental networks composed of specialized sensors, data-loggers, and transmission equipment. This information must be available in seismological data centers to improve early warning diffusion. Furthermore, this information is necessary for research [...] Read more.
Organizations responsible for seismic and volcanic monitoring worldwide mainly gather information from instrumental networks composed of specialized sensors, data-loggers, and transmission equipment. This information must be available in seismological data centers to improve early warning diffusion. Furthermore, this information is necessary for research purposes to improve the understanding of the phenomena. However, the acquisition data systems could have some information gaps due to unstable connections with instrumental networks and repeater nodes or exceeded waiting times in data acquisition processes. In this work, we performed a systematic review around information availability issues and solutions in data acquisition systems, instrumental networks, and their interplay with transmission media for seismic and volcanic monitoring. Based on the SLR methodology proposed by Kitchenham, B., a search string strategy was considered where 1938 articles were found until December 2021. Subsequently, through selection processes, 282 articles were obtained and 51 relevant articles were extracted using filters based on the content of articles mainly referring to seismic–volcanic data acquisition, data formats, monitoring networks, and early warnings. As a result, we identified two independent partial solutions that could complement each other. One focused on extracting information in the acquisition systems corresponding to continuous data generated by the monitoring points through the development of mechanisms for identifying sequential files. The other solution focused on the detection and assessment of the alternative transmission media capabilities available in the seismic–volcanic monitoring network. Moreover, we point out the advantage of a unified solution by identifying data files/plots corresponding to information gaps. These could be recovered through alternate/backup transmission channels to the monitoring points to improve the availability of the information that contributes to real-time access to information from seismic–volcanic monitoring networks, which speeds up data recovery processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor-Based Systems for Agriculture and Environmental Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Seismic-volcanic monitoring systems. A general diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Research review process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Study quality assessment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Identified Issues.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Year of publication per applications areas.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7267 KiB  
Article
Cyclone Signatures in the South-West Indian Ocean from Two Decades of Microseismic Noise
by Elisa J. Rindraharisaona, Guilhem Barruol, Emmanuel Cordier, Fabrice R. Fontaine and Alicia Gonzalez
Atmosphere 2021, 12(4), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12040488 - 13 Apr 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2549
Abstract
Tropical Cyclones (TC) represent the most destructive natural disaster affecting the islands in the South-West Indian Ocean (SWIO) each year. Monitoring ocean activity is therefore of primary importance to secure lands, infrastructures and peoples, but the little number of oceanographic instruments makes it [...] Read more.
Tropical Cyclones (TC) represent the most destructive natural disaster affecting the islands in the South-West Indian Ocean (SWIO) each year. Monitoring ocean activity is therefore of primary importance to secure lands, infrastructures and peoples, but the little number of oceanographic instruments makes it challenging, particularly in real time. Long-term seismological records provide a way to decipher and quantify the past cyclonic activity by analyzing microseisms, seismic waves generated by the ocean activity and propagating through the solid Earth. In the present study, we analyze this microseismic noise generated by cyclones that develop in the SWIO basin between 1999 and 2020, using broadband seismic stations in La Réunion. The power spectral density (PSD), together with the root mean square (RMS) analyses of continuous seismic data recorded by the permanent Geoscope RER seismic station, indicate the intensification of the microseismic noise amplitude in proportion to the cyclone intensity. Thus, we establish a relationship between the cyclone intensity and the PSD of the Secondary Microseisms (SM) in frequency band ∼0.14 to 0.25 Hz (4 to 7 s period). The Pearson coefficient between the observed and estimated TC intensity are >0.8 in the presence of a cyclone with mean wind speeds >75 km/h and with a seismic station distance-to-storm center D < 3000 km. A polarization analysis in the time and frequency domains allows the retrieval of the backazimuth of the SM sources during isolated cyclone events and well-polarized signal, i.e., CpH > 0.6. We also analyzed the RMS of the Primary Microseisms (PM frequency between ∼0.05 and 0.1 Hz, i.e., for 10 to 20 s period) for cyclones passing nearby La Réunion (D < 500 km), using the available temporary and permanent broadband seismic stations. We also found high correlation coefficients (>0.8) between the PM amplitude and the local wave height issued from the global hindcast model demonstrating that the PM amplitude can be used as a robust proxy to perform a real-time wave-height monitoring in the neighboring ocean. Transfer functions are calculated for several cyclones to infer wave height from the seismic noise amplitude recorded on land. From the analysis of two decades of data, our results suggest that it is possible to quantify the past ocean activity for as long as continuous seismic archives are available, emphasizing microseismic noise as a key observable for quantifying and understanding the climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tropical Cyclones in the Indian Ocean)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic framework and two decades of TC in the SWIO. (<b>a</b>) Map of La Réunion showing the distribution of the terrestrial seismic stations from the OVPF-IPGP (red triangles), from the temporary experiment (blue triangles) and from the Geoscope RER station (magenta triangle). Colored stars show the offshore location of the nodes at which the significant wave heights (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>) were extracted from GOW2 wave model Perez et al. [<a href="#B22-atmosphere-12-00488" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Number of tropical cyclones/storms, per season, between 1999 and 2020. (<b>c</b>) TC tracks (continuous grey lines) in the South-West Indian Ocean during the cyclonic period between 1999 and 2020. The color of each dot indicate the cyclone intensity on a 6-hours basis. The magenta triangle marks the RER seismic station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spectral content of the RER seismic data. (<b>a</b>) Cyclone tracks in the South-West of the Indian ocean during the cyclonic season 2018–2019. Cyclone information is freely available at the Météo France (MF) website (<a href="http://www.meteo.fr/temps/domtom/La_Reunion/webcmrs9.0/anglais/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.meteo.fr/temps/domtom/La_Reunion/webcmrs9.0/anglais/index.html</a> accessed on 12 April 2021). (<b>b</b>) Average PSD of data recorded by station RER during each cyclone of the season 2018–2019. For each event, the median (continuous colored lines) of the daily average for the days with an intensity higher than 90 km/h are computed. The black dotted-dashed line indicates the PSD at RER for days without cyclone activity (nor austral swell activity) in 2019. For reference, the high and low noise models [<a href="#B30-atmosphere-12-00488" class="html-bibr">30</a>] are plotted in black continuous and dashed lines, respectively. Grey shadings indicate the frequency domains of PM and SM (in dark and light, respectively). (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Spectrograms of microseismic noise of the RER station vertical component for the cyclonic season 2018–2019, up to 0.5 Hz (linear scale). Each cyclone is indicated by a white box. Black lines show the cyclone’s intensity (right axis, showing the wind velocity in km/h from MF) and colored dashed lines show the distance between the storm center and RER station. Austral swell events are indicated by the pink boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cyclone powers and SM intensities. (<b>a</b>) Six hours average of cyclone intensity (i.e., maximum mean wind at the cyclone center, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>) in the SWIO during the cyclonic seasons between 1999 and 2020. Colored bar shows the cyclone intensity (colored dots), ranging between 40 km/h (TD) and 165 km/h (ITC). The magenta triangle indicates the RER seismic station used in this study. (<b>b</b>) Six hours average of the SM PSD in frequency bands between 0.14 and 0.25 Hz (periods ∼4–7 s) recorded at station RER and plotted at the cyclone center, the color bar indicates the amplitude of the PSD ranging between −125 dB (blue) and −105 dB (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Seismic energy vs cyclone distance and intensity. (<b>a</b>) Relation between the SM PSD (periods ∼4–7 s) recorded at station RER and the distance to the storm center. The intensity of the TCs is plotted on a 6-hour basis (same as <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>) with the color bar scale indicating the average wind speed. Grey lines represent the transfer function between the PSD and each individual cyclone distance. Red line shows the average of the grey lines. Green line indicates the transfer function using all the cyclones. (<b>b</b>) Correlation between the SM PSD and the TC intensity. Color bar scale indicates the distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Regionalization of the cyclone signature. <b>Left column</b>: SM PSD in the 0.14–0.25 Hz frequency band (4 to 7 s period) plotted vs the cyclone intensity (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>). Color indicates the number of TC. For each subplot, the best transfer function between the SM PSD (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>M</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> is indicated at the top left corner. The <span class="html-italic">P</span> value (bottom right corner) indicates the Pearson coefficient correlation between the two data sets. Magenta line indicates the linear fit between the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>M</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) Diagram combining all TC tracks, such as in <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>. The geographical locations for the other sub-groups (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) are shown in the top right corner and defined by the longitudes (lon), latitudes (lat) and distance ranges between the storm center and the seismic station RER. <b>Right column</b>: At the top, histogram of the density probability of the TC intensity data between 1999 and 2018 with their gamma distribution approximation (green line color). The 3 following subplots show the geographical boundaries for each sub-group of TC tracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cyclone trajectories and intensities. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Cyclone trajectories in the SWIO during the cyclonic seasons 2017–2018 (<b>a</b>) and 2018–2019 (<b>b</b>) with the TC center located every 6 h and color-coded by cyclones. RER station is located by a black triangle. (<b>c</b>) Observed (black dots) and estimated (colored dots) TC intensity for the cyclonic seasons 2017–2018 (left axis). The estimated TC intensity shown in blue, green and cyan dots were obtained from the transfer functions for a geographical location defined by group 2, group 3 and group 4, respectively (as defined in <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a> and <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>). Dashed colored lines indicate the distance between the storm center and the seismic station RER (right axis). The Yellow dots (in Eketsang) color were estimated using the transfer function using all data (i.e., in <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>a). (<b>d</b>) Same as c but for the cyclonic season 2018–2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cyclone trajectories and SM polarization in La Réunion Island. (<b>a</b>) Tracks of the tropical cyclones that have a <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>H</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> &gt; 0.6 between 2017 and 2019. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Comparison of the averages obtained from the theoretical BAZ (pink arrows) with the average seismically measured BAZ for Dumazile ((<b>b</b>), lime arrow), Fakir ((<b>c</b>), Blue arrows) and Cilida ((<b>d</b>), green arrows).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SM signatures of cyclones at La Réunion seismic stations. (<b>a</b>) Tracks of the tropical cyclones that passed close to Réunion Island between 2011 and 2019 (distance station-to-storm center &lt;500 km). The inset map shows the seismic stations onland (in red from the OVPF and in blue from the ZF temporary network) and the offshore node locations at which the modeled <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> are extracted. (<b>b</b>–<b>q</b>) Each subplot shows the RMS amplitude of the SM (colored dots, left axis) for each selected cyclone, together with the distance between the storm center and the seismic station plotted as colored diamonds (on the right axis, blue scale) and the cyclone intensity plotted as continuous black lines (right axis, black scale). For each cyclone, the RMS amplitude at the various stations is plotted with the same color code as the track on the map <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>a. All seismic stations have the same color.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>PM signatures of cyclones at La Réunion seismic stations. (<b>a</b>) Tracks of the cyclones that passed near Réunion island between 2011 and 2019 (distance &lt; 500 km). The inset map shows the seismic stations onland (in red from the OVPF permanent and in blue from the ZF temporary, networks) and the offshore node locations at which the modeled <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> are extracted. (<b>b</b>–<b>q</b>) Each subplot shows the RMS amplitude of the PM (colored dots, left axis) together with the modeled significant wave height <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> extracted from GOW2 model Perez et al. [<a href="#B22-atmosphere-12-00488" class="html-bibr">22</a>] (plotted in colored continuous lines). The different <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> colors indicate their locations in the inset map. For each cyclone, the RMS amplitude is plotted in the same color as the track on the map in the center and all stations have the same color. Note the different scale amplitude for each subplot adapted for both the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> and the PM RMS amplitude.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Primary microseisms and significant wave-height correlation for TC Dumile and fakir. (<b>a</b>) Trajectories of Dumile (in December 2012–January 2013, dots symbol) and Fakir (in April 2018, diamonds symbol). The cyclone is located every 6 h. To avoid overcrowded map, month, day and hour only are plotted on the maps. The cyclone categories have the same legend as in <a href="#atmosphere-12-00488-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>. (<b>b</b>) Correlation coefficient between <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> modeled at different nodes around the island and PM amplitude recorded at terrestrial station MAT (pink triangle) for Dumile. (<b>c</b>) Same as (<b>b</b>) but for Fakir. (<b>d</b>) Dumile RMS PM amplitude at MAT station (pink dots), together with the significant wave heights <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (colored continuous lines) from the GOW2 models extracted at different nodes around the island (with the same color as the nodes in (<b>b</b>)). <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> used to determine the transfer functions are shown in bold lines. Vertical dashed lines indicate the time window used to compute the correlation coefficient and the transfer functions. (<b>e</b>) Same as (<b>d</b>) but for Fakir. (<b>f</b>,<b>g</b>) Relation between the significant wave height <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> as a function of the hourly RMS amplitude of the PM for Dumile and Fakir at station MAT, together with the corresponding linear transfer functions. Dot colors are the same as the bold <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> lines from plots (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1920 KiB  
Article
Non-Extensive Statistical Analysis of Acoustic Emissions Recorded in Marble and Cement Mortar Specimens Under Mechanical Load Until Fracture
by Andronikos Loukidis, Dimos Triantis and Ilias Stavrakas
Entropy 2020, 22(10), 1115; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101115 - 2 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2357
Abstract
Non-extensive statistical mechanics (NESM), which is a generalization of the traditional Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, constitutes a theoretical and analytical tool for investigating the irreversible damage evolution processes and fracture mechanisms occurring when materials are subjected to mechanical loading. In this study, NESM is used [...] Read more.
Non-extensive statistical mechanics (NESM), which is a generalization of the traditional Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, constitutes a theoretical and analytical tool for investigating the irreversible damage evolution processes and fracture mechanisms occurring when materials are subjected to mechanical loading. In this study, NESM is used for the analysis of the acoustic emission (AE) events recorded when marble and cement mortar specimens were subjected to mechanical loading until fracture. In total, AE data originating from four distinct loading protocols are presented. The cumulative distribution of inter-event times (time interval between two consecutive AE events) and the inter-event distances (three-dimensional Euclidian distance between the centers of successive AE events) were examined under the above concept and it was found that NESM is suitable to detect criticality under the terms of mechanical status of a material. This was conducted by evaluating the fitting results of the q-exponential function and the corresponding q-indices of Tsallis entropy qδτ and qδr, along with the parameters τδτ and dδr. Results support that qδτ+qδr2 for AE data recorded from marble and cement mortar specimens of this work, which is in good agreement with the conjecture previously found in seismological data and AE data recorded from Basalt specimens. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation of the applied mechanical stress (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the marble specimen of the experiment A. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation of the applied mechanical load (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the marble specimen during the three-point bending experiment B. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation, in terms of the logarithmic (t<sub>f</sub>-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>], of the applied mechanical load (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the marble specimen during the direct tension experiment C. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation of the applied mechanical load (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the marble specimen during the shear experiment D. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation, in terms of the logarithmic (t<sub>f</sub>-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>], of the applied mechanical load (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the cement specimen during the three-point bending experiment E1 with no internal reinforcement, in terms of the logarithmic(tf-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation, in terms of the logarithmic (t<sub>f</sub>-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>], of the applied mechanical load (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the cement specimen during the three-point bending experiment E-2 embedded with steel fibres as internal reinforcement, in terms of the logarithmic (t<sub>f</sub>-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) The temporal variation, in terms of the logarithmic (t<sub>f</sub>-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>], of the applied mechanical load (green line) and the amplitudes of the recorded AE events (pink square markers) for the case of the cement specimen during the three-point bending experiment E-3 embedded with plastic fibres as internal reinforcement, in terms of the logarithmic (t<sub>f</sub>-t) scale [<a href="#B50-entropy-22-01115" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the AE inter-event times (red circle markers) and inter-event distances (blue triangle markers), along with the corresponding q-exponential fitting curves (red and blue solid curves).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4648 KiB  
Article
Pyroclastic Density Current Hazard Assessment and Modeling Uncertainties for Fuego Volcano, Guatemala
by Ian T. W. Flynn and Michael S. Ramsey
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(17), 2790; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172790 - 27 Aug 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4130
Abstract
On 3 June 2018, Fuego volcano experienced a VEI = 3 eruption, which produced a pyroclastic density current (PDC) that devastated the La Réunion resort and the community of Los Lotes, resulting in over 100 deaths. To evaluate the potential hazard to the [...] Read more.
On 3 June 2018, Fuego volcano experienced a VEI = 3 eruption, which produced a pyroclastic density current (PDC) that devastated the La Réunion resort and the community of Los Lotes, resulting in over 100 deaths. To evaluate the potential hazard to the population centers surrounding Fuego associated with future PDC emplacement, we used an integrated remote sensing and flow modeling-based approach. The predominate PDC travel direction over the past 15 years was investigated using thermal infrared (TIR) data from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) instrument validated with ground reports from the National Institute of Seismology, Volcanology, Meteorology, and Hydrology (INSIVUMEH), the government agency responsible for monitoring. Two different ASTER-derived digital elevation model (DEM) products with varying levels of noise were also used to assess the uncertainty in the VolcFlow model results. Our findings indicate that the recent historical PDC travel direction is dominantly toward the south and southwest. Population centers in this region of Fuego that are within ~2 km of one of the volcano’s radial barrancas are at the highest risk during future large eruptions that produce PDCs. The ASTER global DEM (GDEM) product has the least random noise and where used with the VolcFlow model, had a significant improvement on its accuracy. Results produced longer flow runout distances and therefore better conveys a more accurate perception of risk. Different PDC volumes were then modeled using the GDEM and VolcFlow to determine potential inundation areas in relation to local communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Google Earth image of Fuego volcano annotated to show the seven primary barrancas (ravines) that are radially distributed to the west, south and east. Small lava flows, pyroclastic density currents (PDCs), and lahars are typically confined to these seven barrancas. The white stars indicate the two locations where the 3 June 2018, PDC exited the Las Lajas barranca. The two National Institute of Seismology, Volcanology, Meteorology, and Hydrology (INSIVUMEH) volcano observatories are shown by the red X marks (labeled FO1 and FO2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Satellite images of the La Réunion golf resort. Las Lajas barranca (outlined) lies directly to the west of the resort and golf course. (<b>a</b>) 7 March 2018 (prior to the eruption). (<b>b</b>) 14 November 2018 (~5 months after the eruption). Images from Google Earth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Satellite images of the village of Los Lotes, which is ~1.5 km south of the PDC exit point from Las Lajas barranca. The paved road (RN-14) serves as the primary trade route between Mexico and Guatemala [<a href="#B7-remotesensing-12-02790" class="html-bibr">7</a>]. The boarder of Mexico is ~150 km NW of Los Lotes. (<b>a</b>) 7 March 2018 (prior to the eruption). (<b>b</b>) 14 November 2018 (~5 months after the eruption). Images from Google Earth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Examples of the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) thermal infrared (TIR) nighttime surface kinetic temperature product used to investigate the volcanic activity at Fuego. The thermally-elevated regions show: (<b>a</b>) a PDC traveling to the SW down Cenizas barranca; (<b>b</b>) a PDC traveling to the SE down El Jute barranca. Other thermal anomalies seen in the data include: (<b>c</b>) a lava flow traveling down Cenizas barranca (note the black “recovery” pixels at the summit indicating adjacent saturated pixels); (<b>d</b>) a grouping of thermally elevated pixels at the summit most likely caused by open-vent or dome activity. Scene subsets (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) were validated using the INSIVUMEH reports to confirm the type of activity and direction traveled. See <a href="#remotesensing-12-02790-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> for the location of the named barrancas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Rose diagram showing the directionality of the PDC events over the ~15-year study period. PDC directionality was determined using both ASTER scenes and INSIVUMEH reports. Sixteen PDCs traveled southwest (Taniluya and Cenizas barrancas), 13 traveled southeast (El Jute and Las Lajas barrancas), 11 traveled south (Trinidad barranca), and 11 traveled northwest (Seca/Santa Teresa barrancas), while only 3 traveled to the northeast (Honda barranca).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>VolcFlow model result of PDC coverage for an eruptive volume of 30 × 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup> shown over: (<b>a</b>) the ASTER global digital elevation model (GDEM) version 2 product and (<b>b</b>) an individual ASTER scene DEM from 24 January 2018. Warmer colors indicate thicker PDC coverage estimated by the model. The dashed yellow outline in (<b>a</b>) is the approximate coverage area of the 3 June 2018, pyroclastic flow. Increased noise in (<b>b</b>) cause artificial topographic barriers that produced inaccurate model results and much shorter PDC flows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Difference image (ASTER GDEM minus an individual scene ASTER DEM from 24 January 2018). The extreme high and low values in this image are the result of clouds (erroneous topographic highs) and cloud shadows (erroneous topographic lows). Four regions of interest (ROI) (white boxes) were used to calculate the average difference between the two DEMs. ROI were chosen to avoid complications from the small areas of cloud cover, cloud shadow, and larger-scale topographic shadowing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Inundation PDC hazard map for Fuego created using VolcFlow and the ASTER GDEM. Each color represents a different PDC volume. The PDCs tend to follow the topographic lows (barrancas) with only minor deviations. Population centers that could possibly be impacted by future larger PDC events are identified. The inundation PDC hazard map indicates that both Los Lotes and La Réunion were at risk from a PDC with a volume similar to the estimate for the 3 June 2018.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4676 KiB  
Article
Co-Seismic Deformation and Fault Slip Model of the 2017 Mw 7.3 Darbandikhan, Iran–Iraq Earthquake Inferred from D-InSAR Measurements
by Zicheng Huang, Guohong Zhang, Xinjian Shan, Wenyu Gong, Yingfeng Zhang and Yanchuan Li
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(21), 2521; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212521 - 28 Oct 2019
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4447
Abstract
The 12 November 2017 Darbandikhan earthquake (Mw 7.3) occurred along the converence zone. Despite the extensive research on this earthquake, none of this work explained whether this earthquake rupture was limited to the thick sedimentary cover or it extends to the underlying crystalline [...] Read more.
The 12 November 2017 Darbandikhan earthquake (Mw 7.3) occurred along the converence zone. Despite the extensive research on this earthquake, none of this work explained whether this earthquake rupture was limited to the thick sedimentary cover or it extends to the underlying crystalline basement rock (or both). Besides, whether this region will generate devastating earthquakes again and whether there is a one-to-one correlation between these anticlines and blind-reverse faults need further investigation. In this study, we derived the co-seismic interferograms from the Sentinel-1A/B data and successfully described the surface deformation of the main seismic zone. The fringe patterns of both the ascending and descending interferograms show that the co-seismic deformation is dominated by horizontal movements. Then, using the along- and across-track deformation fields of different orbits, we retrieved the three-dimensional deformation field, which suggests that the Darbandikhan earthquake may be a blind thrust fault close to the north–south direction. Finally, we inverted the geometrical parameters of the seismogenic fault and the slip distribution of the fault plane. The results show that the source fault has an average strike of 355.5° and a northeast dip angle of −17.5°. In addition, the Darbandikhan earthquake has an average rake of 135.5°, with the maximum slip of 4.5 m at 14.5 km depth. On the basis of the derived depth and the aftershock information provided by the Iranian Seismological Center, we inferred that this event primarily ruptured within the crystalline basement and the seismogenic fault is the Zagros Mountain Front Fault (MFF). The seismogenic region has both relatively low historical seismicity and convergent strain rate, which suggests that the vicinity of the epicenter may have absorbed the majority of the energy released by the convergence between the Arabian and the Eurasian plates and may generate Mw > 7 earthquakes again. Moreover, the Zagros front fold between the Lurestan Arc and the Kirkuk Embayment may be generated by the long-distance slippage of the uppermost sedimentary cover in response to the sudden shortening of the MFF basement. We thus conclude that the master blind thrust may control the generation of the Zagros front folding. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Regional tectonic setting and the background seismicity of the 2017 Mw 7.3 Darbandikhan earthquake. (<b>a</b>) The tectonic map of Zagros, which is composed of the Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt (ZFTB), the Zagros Imbricate Zone (ZIZ), and the Urumieh-Dokhar Magmatic Assemblage (UDMA). ZFTB can be divided into four parts from northwest to southeast: Kirkuk Embayment (KE), Lurestan Arc (LA), Dezful Embayment (DE), and Fars Arc (FA). The black and red arrows denote the GPS velocity of the Arabian plate relative to the stable Eurasia plate and GPS velocity field, respectively [<a href="#B2-remotesensing-11-02521" class="html-bibr">2</a>]. The black rectangle outlines the study area, which is shown in (<b>b</b>). (<b>b</b>) The seismotectonic setting of the study area. Red beach balls and red stars show the focal moment solution and the epicenter of the Mw 7.3 Darbandikhan earthquake reported by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Global Centroid Moment Tensor Project (CMT), respectively. The gray moment tensors are the historical earthquakes (&gt;Mw 5.0) documented by Global CMT (1976–2017). White and yellow dots are the foreshocks (Mw &gt; 4.0) between June and July 2017 and the aftershocks (Mw &gt; 3) between 12 November 2017 and 1 October 2018 from USGS, respectively. The red line depicts the major strike fault, the Main Recent Fault (MRF). The dashed red lines denote the possible locations of “master blind thrusts”, which are the High Zagros Fault (HZF), Zagros Foredeep Fault (ZFF) and Mountain Front Fault (MFF). The white squares indicate the cities around the mainshock. The purple rectangles show the spatial coverage of the Sentinel-1A/B data. The area outlined by the black rectangle will be discussed in <a href="#remotesensing-11-02521-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) show the co-seismic deformation interferograms derived from the Sentinel-1A/B data. Each cycle of color (from blue to red) represent a half radar wavelength (0.028 m) along the line-of-sight direction. The solid black lines denote the estimated locations of the seismogenic fault (model A and B). The red star indicates the epicenter derived from Global CMT. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are the unwrapped interferograms of (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), respectively. The dashed black lines, 1-1′, 2-2′, and 3-3′, pass through the maximum and minimum displacement of the coseismic deformation field. (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) show the LOS displacements along profiles 1-1′, 2-2′, and 3-3′.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) are the across-track (LOS) displacement of track 72 and track 6, respectively. (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) are the along-track (offset azimuth) displacement of track 72 and track 6, respectively. (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) are the three-dimensional (3D) co-seismic deformation map of the Mw 7.3 Darbandikhan earthquake based on the ascending (track 72) and descending (track 6) orbit LOS displacements (from D-InSAR) and azimuth displacement (from offset tracking) in the east–west, north–south, and up–down directions, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The joint inversion of the fault slip estimate from the Sentinel-1A/B ascending-track and descending-track data with seismogenic faults by Model A. The black vector indicates the magnitude and azimuth of slip. The dashed grey, red, and blue lines are the profiles that have been detailed in (<b>i</b>,<b>ii</b>). (<b>b</b>) The joint inversion of fault slip estimated from the Sentinel-1A/B ascending-track and descending-track data with seismogenic faults by Model B. (<b>c</b>) The slip distribution of fault on the map coordinate (Model A). White dots are the aftershocks (Mw &gt; 3) between 12 November 2017 and 1 January 2019 from the Iranian Seismological Center. The thick black line represents fault tracks at the surface. Black beach balls and the yellow star show the focal moment solution and the epicenter of the Mw 7.3 Darbandikhan earthquake reported by Global Centroid Moment Tensor Project (CMT), respectively. (<b>d</b>) The relationship diagram between aftershock depth and number.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The co-seismic deformation field derived from data of (<b>a</b>) track 72, (<b>d</b>) track 79, and (<b>g</b>) track 6. The co-seismic deformation field estimated by the preferred model using data of (<b>b</b>) track 72, (<b>e</b>) track 79 and (<b>h</b>) track 6. (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>) are the residuals obtained by subtracting the prediction from the observation value. The de-coherent areas and linear surface ruptures are outlined by black rectangles. The dashed red lines A–B and C–D are two profiles that will be analyzed in <a href="#remotesensing-11-02521-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The LOS displacements along the profiles A-B and C-D of <a href="#remotesensing-11-02521-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>. Blue, grey, and red lines denote the observed deformation, predicted deformation, and residuals, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) The surface vertical components of the displacement map derived from the ascending (track 72) and descending (track 6) orbit LOS displacements (from D-InSAR) and azimuth displacement (from offset tracking). The black dot indicates the location of Mount Bamo. (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) show the topography variation along profile A-A′, B-B′, C-C′, D-D′, and E-E′ denoted by the red dashed lines in (<b>a</b>). The red line in (<b>b</b>) shows the vertical deformation along profile A-A′.</p>
Full article ">
1 pages, 117 KiB  
Abstract
Seismic B-Value Study in Southern Slope of Greater Caucasus (Azerbaijan)
by Babayev Gulam and Aliyev Mirzali
Proceedings 2019, 24(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2019-06227 - 13 Jun 2019
Viewed by 962
Abstract
In this study, there was an attempt to estimate seismic hazard in terms of b-value distribution over the southern slope of Greater Caucasus (Azerbaijan). The southern slope of Caucasus (Azerbaijan) is influenced by tectonic activity driven by Arabian and Eurasian plate tectonics. The [...] Read more.
In this study, there was an attempt to estimate seismic hazard in terms of b-value distribution over the southern slope of Greater Caucasus (Azerbaijan). The southern slope of Caucasus (Azerbaijan) is influenced by tectonic activity driven by Arabian and Eurasian plate tectonics. The differences between seismotectonic characteristics are considered for large tectonic zones within this southern slope (Balaken-Zagatala, Sheki-Oguz-Gabala, Ismailli-Shamakhi). The b-value is one of the important components in the Gutenberg–Richter empirical relation. This relation represents the frequency of occurrence of seismic events as a function of their magnitude. The a-value and the b-value in this relation are constants and they characterize the seismic features. The a-value describes the seismic activity in terms of spatial and temporal occurrences within a certain period, while the b-value measures the relation of strong to weak earthquakes. The b-value indicates the dynamics of the tectonic regime of the area. This constant demonstrates the distribution of low or high stresses. The data for this study has been extracted from the Azerbaijan seismological center (RCSS). Different relations have then been developed for each separate zone. Some studies revealed spatial and temporal variations of the b-value before large earthquakes during the last decades. The b-value distribution results show that a decrease is observed in the western part of the region (Zagatala, Sheki), in the Shamakhi area and in some areas of the northern part which is an indication of higher stress in those areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Geosciences)
14 pages, 8622 KiB  
Article
Seismic Remote Sensing of Super Typhoon Lupit (2009) with Seismological Array Observation in NE China
by Jianmin Lin, Yating Wang, Weitao Wang, Xiaofeng Li, Sunke Fang, Chao Chen and Hong Zheng
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(2), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020235 - 3 Feb 2018
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 5164
Abstract
The p-wave double-frequency (DF) microseisms generated by super typhoon Lupit (14–26 October 2009) over the western Pacific Ocean were detected by an on-land seismological array deployed in Northeastern China. We applied a frequency-domain beamforming method to investigate their source regions. Comparing with [...] Read more.
The p-wave double-frequency (DF) microseisms generated by super typhoon Lupit (14–26 October 2009) over the western Pacific Ocean were detected by an on-land seismological array deployed in Northeastern China. We applied a frequency-domain beamforming method to investigate their source regions. Comparing with the best-track data and satellite observations, the located source regions of the p-wave DF microseisms, which corresponded to the strongest ocean wave–wave interactions, were found to be comparable to the typhoon centers in the microseismic frequency band of ~0.18–0.21 Hz. The p-wave DF microseisms were probably excited by the nonlinear interaction of ocean waves generated by the typhoon at different times, in good agreement with the Longuet–Higgins theory for the generation of DF microseisms. The localization deviation, which was ~120 km for typhoon Lupit in this study, might depend on the speed and direction of typhoon movement, the geometry of the seismological array, and the heterogeneity of the solid Earth structure. The p-wave DF microseisms generated in coastal source regions were also observed in the beamformer outputs, but with relatively lower dominant frequency band of ~0.14–0.16 Hz. These observations show that the p-wave DF microseisms generated near typhoon centers could be used as a seismic remote sensing proxy to locate and track typhoons over the oceans from under water in a near-real-time and continuous manner. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Undersea Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Locations of the 129 NECESSArray stations and the best track of typhoon Lupit in the Philippine Sea with shaded relief bathymetry. The best-track data are from the Japan Meteorological Agency (<a href="http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/trackarchives.html" target="_blank">http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/trackarchives.html</a>), and are indicated by color-coded round circles spaced in 6-h time intervals, with circle size proportional to wind speed. The seismic stations are represented by red and blue triangles, with the blue ones chosen randomly to display the recording waveforms, as shown in <a href="#remotesensing-10-00235-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Seismic waveforms and (<b>b</b>) temporal frequency spectrograms of the microseisms generated during the life span of typhoon Lupit at the stations NEA2, NE87, NE6A, NE3C and NE59 of NECESSArray, labeled by blue triangles in <a href="#remotesensing-10-00235-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>. The unit (dB) corresponds to <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> <mi>·</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>g</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>/</mo> <mi>Hz</mi> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Source locations of Lupit-generated <span class="html-italic">p</span>-wave DF microseisms in the form of beamformer outputs using the NECESSArray data at different times: (<b>a</b>) 06:00 UTC, 21 October; (<b>b</b>) 12:00 UTC, 21 October; (<b>c</b>) 18:00 UTC, 21 October; (<b>d</b>) 00:00 UTC, 22 October; (<b>e</b>) 06:00 UTC, 22 October; (<b>f</b>) 12:00 UTC, 22 October; (<b>g</b>) 18:00 UTC, 22 October; (<b>h</b>) 00:00 UTC, 23 October; and (<b>i</b>) 06:00 UTC, 23 October. The beams were calculated and stacked over the frequency band of 0.18–0.21 Hz. The solid circles indicate the track of Lupit with the white one representing the current location of the typhoon center according to the best-track data of the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC). A full animation is available in the electronic supplement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison between the typhoon center locations (green triangles) observed by satellites and the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-wave DF microseism source locations calculated according to the beamformer outputs using data at the NECESSArray at different times: (<b>a</b>) 02:05 UTC, 19 October; (<b>b</b>) 05:05 UTC, 21 October; (<b>c</b>) 04:50 UTC, 23 October; and (<b>d</b>) 02:25 UTC, 24 October. The base map is true color composites of MODIS images, which rank band composites in order: red band (band 1: 620–670 nm), green band (band 2: 545–565 nm) and blue band (band 3: 459–479 nm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schemes for the DF microseism source regions under a hypothetical typhoon in the Northern hemisphere. Gray ellipses represent schematically the main source regions of DF microseisms with “wave-wave interaction” when (<b>a</b>) typhoon moves northward with relatively slower velocity than the ocean wave propagates; (<b>b</b>) typhoon moves northward with relatively faster velocity than the ocean wave propagates; and (<b>c</b>) typhoon movement direction changes. Red and blue hurricane symbols indicate the typhoon centers at an earlier time t1 and a later time t2, respectively. Dashed arrows and curved lines show the propagation directions and streamlines of swells generated at different time. Solid arrows and curved lines show the propagation directions and streamlines of the locally generated wind sea at different time. Black arrows indicate the direction of typhoon movement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Localization deviation (orange solid line, calculated by the distance between the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-wave DF microseism source region located by the beamformer outputs and the typhoon center according to the best-track data of RSMC) compared with the typhoon moving speed (blue solid line). The black circles represent the radius-to-maximum-wind. The RMS error of the localization results after 06:00 UTC, 19 October is about 124.2 km. (<b>b</b>) Localization resolution measured by the length of the major axis of the located source regions corresponding to the top 10%, 15% and 20% strongest amplitudes of the beamformer outputs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Array response function of NECESSArray with array geometry presented in <a href="#remotesensing-10-00235-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Source locations of Lupit-generated <span class="html-italic">p</span>-wave DF microseisms in the form of beamformer outputs using the NECESSArray data at (<b>a</b>) 18:00 UTC, 24 October; and (<b>b</b>) 00:00 UTC, 25 October. The beams were calculated and stacked over the frequency band of 0.18-0.21 Hz. The solid circles indicate the track of Lupit with the white one representing the current location of typhoon center according to the best-track data of the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Source locations of Lupit-generated <span class="html-italic">p</span>-wave DF microseisms in the frequency band of (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) 0.14–0.16 Hz and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) 0.18–0.21 Hz in the form of beamformer outputs using the NECESSArray data at 18:00 UTC, 21 October and 12:00 UTC, 22 October 2009. The solid circles indicate the track of Lupit with the white one representing the current location of typhoon center according to the best-track data of RSMC.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop