[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (14,834)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = satellite data

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 2174 KiB  
Article
Mapping Methane—The Impact of Dairy Farm Practices on Emissions Through Satellite Data and Machine Learning
by Hanqing Bi and Suresh Neethirajan
Climate 2024, 12(12), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12120223 (registering DOI) - 15 Dec 2024
Abstract
Methane emissions from dairy farms are a significant driver of climate change, yet their relationship with farm-specific practices remains poorly understood. This study employs Sentinel-5P satellite-derived methane column concentrations as a proxy to examine emission dynamics across 11 dairy farms in Eastern Canada, [...] Read more.
Methane emissions from dairy farms are a significant driver of climate change, yet their relationship with farm-specific practices remains poorly understood. This study employs Sentinel-5P satellite-derived methane column concentrations as a proxy to examine emission dynamics across 11 dairy farms in Eastern Canada, using data collected between January 2020 and December 2022. By integrating advanced analytics, we identified key drivers of methane concentrations, including herd genetics, feeding practices, and management strategies. Statistical tools such as Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) addressed multicollinearity, stabilizing predictive models. Machine learning approaches—Random Forest and Neural Networks—revealed a strong negative correlation between methane concentrations and the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) for protein percentage, demonstrating the potential of genetic selection for emissions mitigation. Our approach refined concentration estimates by integrating satellite data with localized atmospheric modeling, enhancing accuracy and spatial resolution. These findings highlight the transformative potential of combining satellite observations, machine learning, and farm-level characteristics to advance sustainable dairy farming. This research underscores the importance of targeted breeding programs and management strategies to optimize environmental and economic outcomes. Future work should expand datasets and apply inversion modeling for finer-scale emission quantification, advancing scalable solutions that balance productivity with ecological sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Smart Technologies in Climate Risk and Adaptation)
20 pages, 3456 KiB  
Article
Atmospheric Modulation Transfer Function Calculation and Error Evaluation for the Panchromatic Band of the Gaofen-2 Satellite
by Zhengqiang Li, Mingjun Liang, Yan Ma, Yang Zheng, Zhaozhou Li and Zhenting Chen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4676; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244676 (registering DOI) - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 351
Abstract
In the optical satellite on-orbit imaging quality estimation system, the calculation of Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) is not fully standardized, and the influence of atmosphere is often simplified, making it difficult to obtain completely consistent on-orbit MTF measurements and comparisons. This study investigates [...] Read more.
In the optical satellite on-orbit imaging quality estimation system, the calculation of Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) is not fully standardized, and the influence of atmosphere is often simplified, making it difficult to obtain completely consistent on-orbit MTF measurements and comparisons. This study investigates the effects of various factors—such as edge angle, edge detection methods, oversampling rate, and interpolation techniques—on the accuracy of MTF calculations in the commonly used slanted-edge method for on-orbit MTF assessment, informed by simulation experiments. A relatively optimal MTF calculation process is proposed, which employs the Gaussian fitting method for edge detection, the adaptive oversampling rate, and the Lanczos (a = 3) interpolation method, minimizing the absolute deviation in the MTF results. A method to quantitatively analyze the atmospheric scattering and absorption MTF is proposed that employs a radiative transfer model. Based on the edge images of GF-2 satellite, images with various atmospheric conditions and imaging parameters are simulated, and their atmospheric scattering and absorption MTF is obtained through comparing the MTFs of the ground and top atmosphere radiance. The findings reveal that aerosol optical depth (AOD), viewing zenith angle (VZA), and altitude (ALT) are the primary factors influencing the accuracy of GF-2 satellite on-orbit MTF measurements in complex scenarios. The on-orbit MTF decreases with the increase in AOD and VZA and increases with the increase in ALT. Furthermore, a collaborative analysis of the main influencing factors of atmospheric scattering and absorption MTF indicates that, taking the PAN band of the GF-2 satellite as an example, the atmospheric MTF values are consistently below 0.7905. Among these, 90% of the data are less than 0.7520, with corresponding AOD conditions ranging from 0 to 0.08, a VZA ranging from 0 to 50°, and an ALT ranging from 0 to 5 km. The results can provide directional guidance for the selection of meteorological conditions, satellite attitude, and geographical location during satellite on-orbit testing, thereby enhancing the ability to accurately measure satellite MTF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
27 pages, 36855 KiB  
Article
Evaluation and Anomaly Detection Methods for Broadcast Ephemeris Time Series in the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System
by Jiawei Cai, Jianwen Li, Shengda Xie and Hao Jin
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 8003; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248003 (registering DOI) - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 386
Abstract
Broadcast ephemeris data are essential for the precision and reliability of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) but are highly susceptible to anomalies caused by various interference factors, such as ionospheric and tropospheric effects, solar radiation pressure, and satellite clock biases. Traditional threshold-based [...] Read more.
Broadcast ephemeris data are essential for the precision and reliability of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) but are highly susceptible to anomalies caused by various interference factors, such as ionospheric and tropospheric effects, solar radiation pressure, and satellite clock biases. Traditional threshold-based methods and manual review processes are often insufficient for detecting these complex anomalies, especially considering the distinct characteristics of different satellite types. To address these limitations, this study proposes an automated anomaly detection method using the IF-TEA-LSTM model. By transforming broadcast ephemeris data into multivariate time series and integrating anomaly score sequences, the model enhances detection robustness through data integrity assessments and stationarity tests. Evaluation results show that the IF-TEA-LSTM model reduces the RMSE by up to 20.80% for orbital parameters and improves clock deviation prediction accuracy for MEO satellites by 68.37% in short-term forecasts, outperforming baseline models. This method significantly enhances anomaly detection accuracy across GEO, IGSO, and MEO satellite orbits, demonstrating its superiority in long-term data processing and its capacity to improve the reliability of satellite operations within the BDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in GNSS Signal Processing and Navigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of incremental updates for window scrolling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart for constructing anomaly score forest clusters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LSTM unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LSTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Anomaly detection framework based on IF-TEA-LSTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>M300 RPO receiver main unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>M300 RPO receiver antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparative analysis of the five parameter sets (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msqrt> <mi>A</mi> </msqrt> </semantics></math>, <span class="html-italic">e</span>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>i</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Ω</mo> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ω</mi> </semantics></math>) for MEO and IGSO orbits, along with GEO orbit parameters, based on hourly sampling. The five subplots on the left, from top to bottom, represent the parameters <math display="inline"><semantics> <msqrt> <mi>A</mi> </msqrt> </semantics></math>, <span class="html-italic">e</span>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>i</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Ω</mo> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ω</mi> </semantics></math> for MEO and IGSO orbits, while the right side corresponds to GEO. The differences between the two orbit types are prominently highlighted.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Visualization of the distribution of 10 broadcast ephemeris parameters for the C26 satellite with hourly sampling. From top to bottom, left to right, the parameters are <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mo>Ω</mo> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>IDOT</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>BDS broadcast ephemeris stability test results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Broadcast ephemeris time-series difference distribution fitting results. As shown in the figure, subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>) respectively represent the normal distribution curves of the nine parameters, which correspond to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mo>Ω</mo> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>IDOT</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The figure demonstrates the monitoring thresholds of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msqrt> <mi>A</mi> </msqrt> </semantics></math>, <span class="html-italic">e</span>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>i</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Ω</mo> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ω</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mo>Ω</mo> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> in subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>). In <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f012" class="html-fig">Figure 12</a>, <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f014" class="html-fig">Figure 14</a> presented within the text, ‘MT’ refers to the monitoring threshold.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) show the distribution of differences for different parameter pairs, with <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> paired according to their respective threshold ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The monitoring thresholds for <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> are shown in subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), respectively, with <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> remaining constant at 0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Correlation analysis of BDS broadcast ephemeris parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparisonof predicted orbital parameter results with actual measurements for selected satellites. The red line indicates predicted values, while the blue line indicates actual values. The dataset has been processed for outlier detection using robust Methods and iForest. Subfigure (<b>a</b>) represents LSTM, subfigure (<b>b</b>) represents A-LSTM, subfigure (<b>c</b>) represents TE-LSTM, and subfigure (<b>d</b>) represents IF-TEA-LSTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Prediction accuracy and performance of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> under different reference frames. The six subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent this parameter under the following forecast time horizons: (<b>a</b>) 24 h forecast, 1 h interval; (<b>b</b>) 96 h forecast, 1 h interval; (<b>c</b>) 7 d forecast, 1 h interval; (<b>d</b>) 15 d forecast, 1 h interval; (<b>e</b>) 30 d forecast, 1 h interval; (<b>f</b>) 90 d forecast, 1 h interval. The subplot distribution in <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f018" class="html-fig">Figure 18</a>, <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f019" class="html-fig">Figure 19</a>, <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f020" class="html-fig">Figure 20</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-08003-f021" class="html-fig">Figure 21</a> follows the same structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Prediction accuracy and performance of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> under different reference frames. The six subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) show the parameter for forecast periods of 24 h, 96 h, 7 days, 15 days, 30 days, and 90 days, each with a 1-h interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Prediction accuracy and performance of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mo>Ω</mo> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> under different reference frames. The six subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) show the parameter for forecast periods of 24 h, 96 h, 7 days, 15 days, 30 days, and 90 days, each with a 1-hour interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Prediction accuracy and performance of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> under different reference frames. The six subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) show the parameter for forecast periods of 24 h, 96 h, 7 days, 15 days, 30 days, and 90 days, each with a 1-hour interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Prediction accuracy and performance of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> under different reference frames. The six subplots (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) show the parameter for forecast periods of 24 h, 96 h, 7 days, 15 days, 30 days, and 90 days, each with a 1-hour interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Analysis of the distribution characteristics of the five major anomaly parameters under different orbit types. Subplot (<b>a</b>) illustrates the distribution characteristics of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> parameter across GEO, IGSO, and MEO orbit types; subplot (<b>b</b>) shows the distribution of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mo>Ω</mo> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> parameter under the same orbit types; subplot (<b>c</b>) depicts the distribution characteristics of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> parameter for GEO, IGSO, and MEO; subplot (<b>d</b>) highlights the distribution of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> parameter across the three orbit types; and subplot (<b>e</b>) presents the distribution characteristics of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> parameter for GEO, IGSO, and MEO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Comparison chart of clock bias parameter prediction results and actual results for some satellites. Subplot (<b>a</b>) represents the comparison between the prediction results before and after differencing, while subplot (<b>b</b>) represents the anomalies detected by IF-TEA-LSTM.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 5261 KiB  
Article
An Investigation of the SOCOLv4 Model’s Suitability for Predicting the Future Evolution of the Total Column Ozone
by Georgii Nerobelov, Yurii Timofeyev, Alexander Polyakov, Yana Virolainen, Eugene Rozanov and Vladimir Zubov
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1491; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121491 (registering DOI) - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 187
Abstract
The anthropogenic impact on the ozone layer is expressed in anomalies in the total ozone content (TOC) on a global scale, with periodic enhancements observed in high-latitude areas. In addition, there are significant variations in TOC time trends at different latitudes and seasons. [...] Read more.
The anthropogenic impact on the ozone layer is expressed in anomalies in the total ozone content (TOC) on a global scale, with periodic enhancements observed in high-latitude areas. In addition, there are significant variations in TOC time trends at different latitudes and seasons. The reliability of the TOC future trends projections using climate chemistry models must be constantly monitored and improved, exploiting comparisons against available measurements. In this study, the ability of the Earth’s system model SOCOLv4.0 to predict TOC is evaluated by using more than 40 years of satellite measurements and meteorological reanalysis data. In general, the model overpredicts TOC in the Northern Hemisphere (by up to 16 DU) and significantly underpredicts it in the South Pole region (by up to 28 DU). The worst agreement was found in both polar regions, while the best was in the tropics (the mean difference constitutes 4.2 DU). The correlation between monthly means is in the range of 0.75–0.92. The SOCOLv4 model significantly overestimates air temperature above 1 hPa relative to MERRA2 and ERA5 reanalysis (by 10–20 K), particularly during polar nights, which may be one of the reasons for the inaccuracies in the simulation of polar ozone anomalies by the model. It is proposed that the SOCOLv4 model can be used for future projections of TOC under the changing scenarios of human activities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Measurement and Variability of Atmospheric Ozone)
14 pages, 8958 KiB  
Article
Improved Detection of Great Lakes Water Quality Anomalies Using Remote Sensing
by Karl R. Bosse, Robert A. Shuchman, Michael J. Sayers, John Lekki and Roger Tokars
Water 2024, 16(24), 3602; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243602 (registering DOI) - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 223
Abstract
Due to their immense economic and recreational value, the monitoring of Great Lakes water quality is of utmost importance to the region. Historically, this has taken place through a combination of ship-based sampling, buoy measurements, and physical models. However, these approaches have spatial [...] Read more.
Due to their immense economic and recreational value, the monitoring of Great Lakes water quality is of utmost importance to the region. Historically, this has taken place through a combination of ship-based sampling, buoy measurements, and physical models. However, these approaches have spatial and temporal deficiencies which can be improved upon through satellite remote sensing. This study details a new approach for using long time series of satellite remote sensing data to identify historical and near real-time anomalies across a range of data products. Anomalies are traditionally detected as deviations from historical climatologies, typically assuming that there are no long-term trends in the historical data. However, if present, such trends could result in misclassifying ordinary events as anomalous or missing actual anomalies. The new anomaly detection method explicitly accounts for long-term trends and seasonal variability by first decomposing a 10-plus year data record of satellite remote sensing-derived Great Lakes water quality parameters into seasonal, trend, and remainder components. Anomalies were identified as differences between the observed water quality parameter from the model-derived expected value. Normalizing the anomalies to the mean and standard deviation of the full model remainders, the relative anomaly product can be used to compare deviations across parameters and regions. This approach can also be used to forecast the model into the future, allowing for the identification of anomalies in near real time. Multiple case studies are detailed, including examples of a harmful algal bloom in Lake Erie, a sediment plume in Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron), and a phytoplankton bloom in Lake Superior. This new approach would be best suited for use in a water quality dashboard, allowing users (e.g., water quality managers, the research community, and the public) to observe historical and near real-time anomalies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map showing the study area, consisting of all five of the Laurentian Great Lakes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow diagram showing the process of getting from individual VIIRS satellite images to 10-day aggregated STL decomposition products.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Lake-wide average seasonal time series for Lake Erie CHL (panel (<b>A</b>)), Lake Huron SM (panel (<b>B</b>)), and Lake Superior PZD (panel (<b>C</b>)). Each panel shows the annual seasonal patterns as light gray lines, the 11-year mean as a black line, and the 11-year standard deviation in the gray window.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Lake-wide average time series are shown for the three example parameters: Lake Erie CHL (panels (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>)), Lake Huron SM (panels (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>)), and Lake Superior PZD (panels (<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>)). The panels in the left column show the parameter value time series. The panels in the center column show the absolute anomaly (A) time series. The panels in the right column show the relative anomaly (rA) time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Western Lake Erie harmful algal bloom case study from 22 September 2015. Panel (<b>A</b>) shows the VIIRS true color image, with panel (<b>B</b>) showing the CPA-A derived CHL for the image. Panel (<b>C</b>) shows the expected CHL for this date based on the STL decomposition. Panels (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) show the absolute and relative CHL anomaly maps, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Saginaw Bay sediment plume case study from 21 May 2020. Panel (<b>A</b>) shows the VIIRS true color image, with panel (<b>B</b>) showing the CPA-A derived SM for the image. Panel (<b>C</b>) shows the expected SM for this date based on the STL decomposition. Panels (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) show the absolute and relative SM anomaly maps, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Lake Superior CHL forecast case study from 2 August 2023. Panel (<b>A</b>) shows the VIIRS true color image, with panel (<b>B</b>) showing the CPA-A derived CHL for the image. Panel (<b>C</b>) shows the expected CHL for this date based on the STL decomposition and forecast. Panels (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) show the absolute and relative CHL anomaly maps, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6733 KiB  
Article
Real-Time Orbit Determination of Micro–Nano Satellite Using Robust Adaptive Filtering
by Jing Chen, Xiaojun Jin, Cong Hou, Likai Zhu, Zhaobin Xu and Zhonghe Jin
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 7988; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24247988 (registering DOI) - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 181
Abstract
Low-performing GPS receivers, often used in challenging scenarios such as attitude maneuver and attitude rotation, are frequently encountered for micro–nano satellites. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a modified robust adaptive hierarchical filtering algorithm (named IARKF). This algorithm leverages robust adaptive filtering [...] Read more.
Low-performing GPS receivers, often used in challenging scenarios such as attitude maneuver and attitude rotation, are frequently encountered for micro–nano satellites. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a modified robust adaptive hierarchical filtering algorithm (named IARKF). This algorithm leverages robust adaptive filtering to dynamically adjust the distribution of innovation vectors and employs a fading memory weighted method to estimate measurement noise in real time, thereby enhancing the filter’s adaptability to dynamic environments. A segmented adaptive filtering strategy is introduced, allowing for flexible parameter adjustment in different dynamic scenarios. A micro–nano satellite equipped with a miniaturized dual-frequency GPS receiver is employed to demonstrate precise orbit determination capabilities. On-orbit GPS data from the satellite, collected in two specific scenarios—slow rotation and Earth-pointing stabilization—are analyzed to evaluate the proposed algorithm’s ability to cope with weak GPS signals and satellite attitude instability as well as to assess the achievable orbit determination accuracy. The results show that, compared to traditional Extended Kalman Filters (EKF) and other improved filtering algorithms, the IARKF performs better in reducing post-fit residuals and improving orbit prediction accuracy, demonstrating its superior robustness. The three-axes orbit determination internal consistency precision can reach the millimeter level. This work explores a feasible approach for achieving high-performance orbit determination in micro–nano satellites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Navigation and Positioning)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of IARKF strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of posterior residuals, number of positioning satellites, and GDOP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of posterior residuals in the sky vision.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of posterior residual scatter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Filtering level variation curve and distribution map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of errors for overlapping arc.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of posterior residuals, number of positioning satellites, and GDOP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of posterior residuals in the sky vision.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of posterior residual scatter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Filtering level variation curve and distribution map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of errors for overlapping arc.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4980 KiB  
Article
Modeling the Impact of Socio-Economic and Environmental Factors on Air Quality in the City of Kabul
by Mohammad Shahab Sharifi, Alyas Aslami, Hameedullah Zaheb, Imran Abed, Abdul Wahab Shokoori and Atsushi Yona
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 10969; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410969 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 479
Abstract
Air pollution is a vital concern for developing countries, and the growing concentration of air pollutants in Kabul—the most polluted city in Afghanistan—has raised concerns about the health of its citizens. This study examines Kabul’s ambient air quality from a socio-economic and environmental [...] Read more.
Air pollution is a vital concern for developing countries, and the growing concentration of air pollutants in Kabul—the most polluted city in Afghanistan—has raised concerns about the health of its citizens. This study examines Kabul’s ambient air quality from a socio-economic and environmental perspective, primarily focusing on some crucial parameters, such as the Air Quality Index (AQI), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter (PM2.5), and carbon monoxide (CO). Using multiple regression analysis modeling in R and data from satellite imagery, air quality monitoring stations, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), this study demonstrates a strong relationship between air quality and urban green spaces, population growth, vehicle count, temperature, and electricity availability. Key results indicate that increasing urban green areas improves air quality, but that population growth and heat make air pollution worse. This study suggests that airborne pollutants could be reduced through efficient emissions management, green energy sources, and urban planning. These observations provide policymakers and urban planners with practical recommendations to enhance Kabul’s air quality and general public health. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research methodology flow-chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Concentration of O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub> and CO in the air of Kabul.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Concentration of SO<sub>2</sub> and UV Aerosol Index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Urban spaces and green spaces of Kabul mapped in 2017 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Actual vs. Predicted AQI trend line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Actual vs. Predicted AQI over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Actual vs. Predicted PM2.5 over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Actual vs. predicted PM2.5 trend line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Actual vs. Predicted NO<sub>2</sub> over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Actual vs. Predicted NO<sub>2</sub> trend line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Actual vs. predicted CO trend line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Actual vs. predicted CO over time.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 18178 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Variations of Precipitation Extremes and Population Exposure in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China
by Hao Lin, Xi Yu, Yumei Lin and Yandong Tang
Water 2024, 16(24), 3594; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243594 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 322
Abstract
In recent years, precipitation extremes in China have increased due to global warming, posing a significant threat to human life and property. It is thus crucial to understand the changes in population exposure to precipitation extremes and the causes of these changes, since [...] Read more.
In recent years, precipitation extremes in China have increased due to global warming, posing a significant threat to human life and property. It is thus crucial to understand the changes in population exposure to precipitation extremes and the causes of these changes, since complex terrain areas are not accurately simulated by rain gauge interpolation data. Thus, we first used three satellite-based precipitation products—TRMM 3B42, CHIRPS, and CMORPH—combined with population data to analyze the spatiotemporal changes of precipitation extremes and population exposure from 1998 to 2019 in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region. In addition, the contributions of population, climate, and composite factors were quantified. The results showed that TRMM 3B42 outperformed the other two datasets in the BTH region. Over the past 22 years, the precipitation extremes in the central and northeastern regions, especially in Beijing, reached 2.5 days per decade, while the northern and southern regions showed a downward trend. The highest population exposure was mainly concentrated in central Beijing, most areas of Tianjin, and the urban centers of cities in southeastern Hebei province. Compared to the 2000s, a significant increase in exposure was observed in Beijing, Tianjin, and Zhangjiakou in the 2010s, whereas other regions showed negligible changes during this period. Climatic factors had the greatest influence on population exposure in most cities such as Qinhuangdao and Hengshui, where their climatic contribution exceeded 70%. While population change was more responsible for the increase in population exposure in the densely populated cities such as Tianjin, Handan, and Langfang, these cities contributed over 60% of the population. The interaction effect in Beijing and Tianjin was relatively obvious. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for formulating targeted disaster risk management measures against climate change in the BTH region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of our study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The locations of the rain gauge stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plots of annual precipitation between precipitation products including and corresponding rain gauge data from 1998–2019: (<b>a</b>) TRMM 3B42, (<b>b</b>) CHIRPS, (<b>c</b>) CMORPH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of annual precipitation between precipitation products including and corresponding rain gauge data from 1998–2019: (<b>a</b>) TRMM 3B42, (<b>b</b>) CHIRPS, (<b>c</b>) CMORPH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatter plots of season precipitation between precipitation products including and corresponding rain gauge data from 1998–2019: (<b>a</b>) TRMM 3B42, (<b>b</b>) CHIRPS, (<b>c</b>) CMORPH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plots of precipitation extreme events between precipitation products including and corresponding rain gauge data from 1998–2019: (<b>a</b>) TRMM 3B42, (<b>b</b>) CHIRPS, (<b>c</b>) CMORPH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of precipitation extreme events between precipitation products including and corresponding rain gauge data from 1998–2019: (<b>a</b>) TRMM 3B42, (<b>b</b>) CHIRPS, (<b>c</b>) CMORPH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of days of precipitation extremes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sen’s Slope of R95D (1998–2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mann–Kendall Z-Value of R95D (1998–2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Population exposure in Hebei Province from 1998 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Changes in population exposure to precipitation extremes in the BTH region in the 2010s compared with the 2000s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Changes in population in the BTH region in the 2010s compared with the 2000s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Effects of the changes of (<b>a</b>) climate, (<b>b</b>) population, and (<b>c</b>) their interaction on the exposure in BTH region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Effects of changes in population, climate, and their interaction on the exposure of different cities.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 6702 KiB  
Article
Assimilating Satellite-Based Biophysical Variables Data into AquaCrop Model for Silage Maize Yield Estimation Using Water Cycle Algorithm
by Elahe Akbari, Ali Darvishi Boloorani, Jochem Verrelst and Stefano Pignatti
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4665; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244665 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 328
Abstract
Accurate crop yield estimation is critical to successful agricultural operations. Current crop growth models often overlook the spatial and geographic components of the lands, leading to suboptimal yield estimates. To address this issue, assimilation of satellite vegetation products into these models can account [...] Read more.
Accurate crop yield estimation is critical to successful agricultural operations. Current crop growth models often overlook the spatial and geographic components of the lands, leading to suboptimal yield estimates. To address this issue, assimilation of satellite vegetation products into these models can account for spatial variations in the land and improve estimation accuracy. In this paper, the AquaCrop model, a water-driven crop growth model, was selected for recalibration and assimilation of satellite-derived biophysical products due to its simplicity and lack of computational complexity. To this end, field samples of soil (sampled before cultivation) and crop features were collected during the growing season of silage maize. Digital hemisphere photography (DHP) and destructive sampling methods were used for measuring fraction vegetation cover (fCover) and biomass in Qaleh-Now County, southern Tehran, in 2019. Based on our proposed workflow in previous studies, a Gaussian process regression–particle swarm optimization (GPR-PSO) algorithm and global sensitivity analysis were applied to retrieve the fCover and biomass from Sentinel-2 satellite data and to identify the most sensitive parameters in the AquaCrop model, respectively. Here, we propose the use of an optimization water cycle algorithm (WCA) instead of a PSO algorithm as an assimilation method for the parameter calibration of AquaCrop. This study also focused on using both fCover and biomass state variables simultaneously in the model, as opposed to only the fCover, and found that using both variables led to significantly higher calibration accuracy. The WCA method outperformed the PSO method in AquaCrop’s calibration, leading to more accurate results on maize yield estimates. It has enhanced results, decreasing RMSE values by 3.8 and 4.7 ton/ha, RRMSE by 6.4% and 10%, and increasing R2 by 0.17 and 0.35 for model calibration and validation, respectively. These results suggest that assimilating satellite-derived data and optimizing the calibration process through WCA can significantly improve the accuracy of crop yield estimations in water-driven crop growth models, highlighting the potential of this approach for precision agriculture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cropland and Yield Mapping with Multi-source Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area in Iran and Tehran province (<b>a</b>). Experiment site in Ghale-Nou County (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field sampling according to the silage maize phenology [<a href="#B44-remotesensing-16-04665" class="html-bibr">44</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Samples of DHP taken in ESUs at different phenology stages of silage maize [<a href="#B44-remotesensing-16-04665" class="html-bibr">44</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The AquaCrop model’s calculation scheme with four (1, 2, 3, and 4 numbers) steps and processes (dotted arrows) influenced by water (a to e) and temperature stress (f to g). CC is green canopy cover; Zr, rooting depth; ETo, reference evapotranspiration; WP*, normalized biomass water productivity; HI, harvest index; and GDD, growing degree day. Water stress: (a) slows canopy expansion, (b) accelerates canopy senescence, (c) decreases root deepening, but only if severe, (d) reduces stomatal opening and transpiration, and (e) affects harvest index. Cold temperature stress (f) reduces crop transpiration. Hot or cold temperature stress (g) inhibits pollination and reduces HI [<a href="#B50-remotesensing-16-04665" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The workflow of remote sensing data assimilation into AquaCrop model using WCA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparative analysis of estimated and observed yield using only fCover as state variable, with data assimilation for both PSO and WCAs for AquaCrop calibration and without data assimilation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparative analysis of estimated and observed values of yield using fCover combined with biomass, with data assimilation for both PSO and WCAs for AquaCrop calibration and without data assimilation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Comparative analysis of estimated and observed values of yield using fCover combined with biomass, with data assimilation for both PSO and WCAs for AquaCrop calibration and without data assimilation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparative transcendency of data assimilation into the AquaCrop model based on output yield in the validation phase of the model using fCover alone and in combination with biomass (R<sup>2</sup> and RRMSE (%)). The graphs illustrate the transcendency of methods in the vertical axis compared with those in the horizontal axis. Each method is denoted by a letter (according to the given matrix in this Figure) with transcendency of each method compared pair-wise. PSO and WCA are the meta-heuristic algorithms used for calibration; one and two allude to the number of state variables used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Pixel-based map of estimated crop yield for 19 September. The numbers (i.e., 1–11 in the figure) represent lands that were not included in the calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model and were therefore used to evaluate the final map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Evaluation and comparison of estimated crop yield obtained from pixel-based map with observed values in lands not included in the calibration and validation of AquaCrop model.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7358 KiB  
Article
Research on the Estimation of Air Pollution Models with Machine Learning in Urban Sustainable Development Based on Remote Sensing
by Wenqian Chen, Na Zhang, Xuesong Bai and Xiaoyi Cao
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 10949; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410949 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 282
Abstract
Air quality is directly related to people’s health and quality of life and has a profound impact on the sustainable development of cities. Good air quality is the foundation of sustainable development. To solve the current problem of air quality for sustainable development, [...] Read more.
Air quality is directly related to people’s health and quality of life and has a profound impact on the sustainable development of cities. Good air quality is the foundation of sustainable development. To solve the current problem of air quality for sustainable development, we used high-resolution (1 km) satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth (AOD), meteorological, nighttime light and vegetation data to develop a spatiotemporal convolution feature random forest (SCRF) model to predict the PM2.5 concentration in Shandong from 2016 to 2019. We evaluated the performance of the SCRF model and compared the results of other models, including neural network (BPNN), gradient boosting (GBDT), and random forest (RF) models. The results show that compared with the other models, the improved SCRF model performs best. The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) are 0.83 and 9.87 µg/m3, respectively. Moreover, we discovered that the characteristic variables AOD and air temperature (TEM) data improved the accuracy of the model in Shandong Province. The annual average PM2.5 concentrations in Shandong Province from 2016 to 2019 were 74.44 µg/m3, 65.01 µg/m3, 58.32 µg/m3, and 59 µg/m3, respectively. The spatial distribution of air pollution increases from northeastern and southeastern to western Shandong inland. In general, our research has significant implications for the sustainable development of various cities in Shandong Province. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area and distribution map of PM<sub>2.5</sub> stations (AOD data on 26 December 2018).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the SCRF model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histogram and descriptive statistics of the independent model variables (mean, median and standard deviation).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations at ground monitoring stations in Shandong Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Heatmap and Pearson correlation coefficient histogram of the correlation analysis between the PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration and other characteristic variables: (<b>a</b>) Correlation analysis heatmap; (<b>b</b>) Pearson correlation coefficient histogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in overall R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE with the number of decision trees from 2016 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Model-based feature importance ranking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fitting diagram of the annual PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations predicted by the RF (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and SCRF (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) models in Shandong Province from 2016 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fitting diagram of the seasonal PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations predicted by the RF (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and SCRF (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) models in Shandong Province from 2016 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Annual average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration in Shandong Province from 2016 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Seasonal average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in spring, summer, autumn and winter in Shandong Province from 2016 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Average total concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in spring, summer, autumn and winter in Shandong Province from 2016 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 11599 KiB  
Article
A New Surface Waters Downscaling Approach Applicable at Global Scale
by Thu-Hang Nguyen and Filipe Aires
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4664; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244664 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 243
Abstract
A surface water extent downscaling framework was developed in the past using a floodability index based on topography. We presented here a new downscaling approach including several improvements. (1) The use of a new Floodability Index (FI), including better integration of auxiliary permanent [...] Read more.
A surface water extent downscaling framework was developed in the past using a floodability index based on topography. We presented here a new downscaling approach including several improvements. (1) The use of a new Floodability Index (FI), including better integration of auxiliary permanent waters (i.e., presence of water during the whole time record). By using this updated FI, the new downscaling became a true data-fusion with permanent water databases originating mainly from visible observations. (2) Some discontinuities between low resolution cells have been reduced thanks to a new smoothing algorithm. (3) Finally, a coastal extrapolation scheme has been presented to deal with coarse resolution data contaminated by the ocean. This new and complex downscaling framework was tested here on the GIEMS (Global Inundation Extent from Multi-Satellite) database but the approach is generalizable and any surface water database could be used instead. It was shown that this new downscaling procedure (including several processing steps, algorithms and data sources) is a significant improvement compared to the previous version thanks to the new floodability index and the downscaling processing chain. Compared to the previous version, the downscaling results (GIEMS-D) were more coherent with the permanent water database and preserved better the original low-resolution information (e.g., mean scare error water fraction (0–1) of 0.0041 for the old version, and 0.0018 for the new version, over flooded areas in the Amazon). GIEMS-D has also been evaluated at the global scale and over the Amazon basin using independent datasets, showing an overall good performance of the downscaling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Remote Sensing and GIS Technology in Surface Water Bodies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overall scheme of the downscaling framework. The several steps will be described in detail in the following sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The HR permanent water information from the floodability index (top left) is used to downscale the permanent part of the LR data. <span class="html-italic">First, HR (binary) permanent water is upscaled to fractions in each LR cell. Then, if the LR inundation fraction is lower than the permanent water fraction (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mi>L</mi> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>), the transitory water fraction <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is set to zero, otherwise the permanent water fraction is subtracted from LR value (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>L</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>L</mi> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>). HR permanent water is projected in the downscaling map, and it is the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> that will be allocated to HR transitory pixels based on the floodability index.</span></p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sketch representing the parameters in eq:smoothCoeff for the smoothing process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Downscaling with/without the smoothing procedure. Top-left: LR data to be downscaled. Top-right: floodability index. Bottom-left: downscaled data with edge effects as no smoothing procedure is used. Bottom right: edge effects have been removed thanks to the smoothing procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Coastal extrapolation scheme. (<b>a</b>) Process: From the HR water allocation at the Land-frontiers of the coastal cell (cell with bold black border), a threshold of floodability index <span class="html-italic">T</span> is defined for each Land-frontier, then a threshold <span class="html-italic">t</span> is derived for each HR pixel in the coastal cell. A pixel with floodability index higher than its threshold <span class="html-italic">t</span> is set to water. (<b>b</b>) Order in which coastal cells are extrapolated (from blue to red): The cells that have more contact with Land cells are extrapolated first. The cells processed first can then be used to extrapolate the following coastal cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Downscaling of on single month (12/1994) over the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of the Congo: (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) GIEMS is corrected by GLWD in the previous version and by permanent water integrated in the floodability index in the new version (<span class="html-italic">Corrected GIEMS = max(GIEMS, reference permanent water fraction)</span>); (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) downscaling results; (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) upscaling of the HR results; (<b>g</b>) Google Earth extraction for this region. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>MSE</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.0041 and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>MSE</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.0018 over the whole site. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>MSE</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.0084 and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>MSE</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.0031 over flooded areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Water occurrence from the downscaling of GIEMS around the Sagara Lake using (<b>a</b>) the old version versus, and (<b>b</b>) the new version. (<b>c</b>) GSWO from optical observations at 30 m resolution [<a href="#B20-remotesensing-16-04664" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Google satellite image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Water occurrence global map from GIEMS-D (<b>top</b>) and GSWO (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of GIEMS-D versus GSWO occurrence (%) over all land covers and over some surface types. With higher vegetation, more samples can be seen in the upper-left part sections, meaning more water for the GIEMS-D estimates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlation between GIEMS-D water extent and GSIM river discharge over 2293 basins. The distribution of correlation coefficient is shown on the bottom left corner. Four locations (A, B, C, D) are selected to look into details in <a href="#remotesensing-16-04664-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of GIEMS-D and GSW water extent with GSIM river discharge over 4 basins. Left column: data accumulated over each basin. Central column: data averaged for each month of the year, representing seasonality. Right column: difference of monthly values against corresponding seasonality values, normalized by standard deviation of the whole time series. GSW values are amplified 10 times for better visualization. Numbers floating in the plots are correlation coefficients of water extent (blue for GIEMS-D, green for GSW) and river discharge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of GIEMS-D and SAR [<a href="#B23-remotesensing-16-04664" class="html-bibr">23</a>] in dry (<b>left</b>) and wet (<b>right</b>) states. Two zooms are provided over regions A and B. Google images are given to show the density of vegetation and the challenge to detect surface waters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of water occurrence from GIEMS-D (<b>a</b>), GSWO (<b>b</b>), and SAR (<b>c</b>), over the Amazon (−8° to 0° in latitude; and −66° to −54° in longitude).</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 14986 KiB  
Article
Research on the Lossless Data Compression System of the Argo Buoy Based on BiLSTM-MHSA-MLP
by Sumin Guo, Wenqi Zhang, Yuhong Zheng, Hongyu Li, Yilin Yang and Jiayi Xu
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(12), 2298; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122298 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 279
Abstract
This study addresses the issues of the limited data storage capacity of Argo buoys and satellite communication charges on the basis of data volume by proposing a block lossless data compression method that combines bidirectional long short-term memory networks and multi-head self-attention with [...] Read more.
This study addresses the issues of the limited data storage capacity of Argo buoys and satellite communication charges on the basis of data volume by proposing a block lossless data compression method that combines bidirectional long short-term memory networks and multi-head self-attention with a multilayer perceptron (BiLSTM-MHSA-MLP). We constructed an Argo buoy data compression system using the main buoy control board, Jetson nano development board, and the BeiDou-3 satellite transparent transmission module. By processing input sequences bidirectionally, BiLSTM enhances the understanding of the temporal relationships within profile data, whereas the MHSA processes the outputs of the BiLSTM layer in parallel to obtain richer representations. Building on this preliminary probability prediction model, a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a block length parameter (block_len) are introduced to achieve block compression during training, dynamically updating the model and optimizing symbol probability distributions for more accurate predictions. Experiments conducted on multiple 4000 m single-batch profile datasets from both the PC and Jetson nano platforms demonstrate that this method achieves a lower compression ratio, shorter compression time, and greater specificity. This approach significantly reduces the communication time between Argo buoys and satellites, laying a foundation for the future integration of Jetson Nano into Argo buoys for real-time data compression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Methodologies and Ocean Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>BiLSTM network architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Preliminary probability prediction model structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Probabilistic prediction model structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Profile data division.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Compression process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Decompression process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Jetson nano development board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Module communication process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Hardware connection of the Argo buoy compression system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Compression ratio comparison: (<b>a</b>) comparison between D1 and D7; (<b>b</b>) comparison between D8 and D12.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Compression time comparison: (<b>a</b>) comparison between D1 and D7; (<b>b</b>) comparison between D8 and D12.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of the compression ratio between PC and Jetson nano: (<b>a</b>) comparison between D1 and D7; (<b>b</b>) comparison between D8 and D12.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of the compression time between PC and Jetson nano: (<b>a</b>) comparison between D1 and D7; (<b>b</b>) comparison between D8 and D12.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Comparison of the compression time between PC and Jetson nano: (<b>a</b>) comparison between D1 and D7; (<b>b</b>) comparison between D8 and D12.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of the compression ratio with traditional compression algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of the compression ratio with traditional deep learning compression algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of the compression time with traditional deep learning compression algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Compression ratio comparison with popular compressors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Comparison of compression ratio and compression time on the PC.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 17262 KiB  
Article
Analyzing the Accuracy of Satellite-Derived DEMs Using High-Resolution Terrestrial LiDAR
by Aya Hamed Mohamed, Mohamed Islam Keskes and Mihai Daniel Nita
Land 2024, 13(12), 2171; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122171 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 224
Abstract
The accurate estimation of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) derived from satellite data is critical for numerous environmental applications. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of two satellite-derived elevation models, the ALOS World 3D and SRTM DEMs, specifically for their application in hydrological [...] Read more.
The accurate estimation of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) derived from satellite data is critical for numerous environmental applications. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of two satellite-derived elevation models, the ALOS World 3D and SRTM DEMs, specifically for their application in hydrological modeling. A comparative analysis with Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) measurements assessed the agreement between these datasets. Multiple linear regression models were utilized to evaluate the relationships between the datasets and provide detailed insights into their accuracy and biases. The results indicate significant correlations between satellite DEMs and TLS measurements, with adjusted R-square values of 0.8478 for ALOS and 0.955 for the SRTM. To quantify the average difference, root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated as 10.43 m for ALOS and 5.65 m for the SRTM. Additionally, slope and aspect analyses were performed to highlight terrain characteristics across the DEMs. Slope analysis showed a statistically significant negative correlation between SRTM and TLS slopes (R2 = 0.16, p < 4.47 × 10−10 indicating a weak relationship, while no significant correlation was observed between ALOS and TLS slopes. Aspect analysis showed significant positive correlations for both ALOS and the SRTM with TLS aspect, capturing 30.21% of the variance. These findings demonstrate the accuracy of satellite-derived elevation models in representing terrain features relative to high-resolution terrestrial data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Land – Observation and Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Summary of data processing and analysis workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Analyzing the datasets using a grid-cell-based approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Slope analysis of satellite-derived products (ALOS and SRTM) using grid cell analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Analyzing the TLS slope using a grid-cell-based approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Aspect analysis of satellite-derived products (ALOS and SRTM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Analyzing the TLS aspect using a grid-cell-based approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of satellites (SRTM and ALOS) with TLS measurements. (<b>a</b>) Elevation values, (<b>b</b>) slope values, and (<b>c</b>) aspect values for comparison of each model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Comparison of satellites (SRTM and ALOS) with TLS measurements. (<b>a</b>) Elevation values, (<b>b</b>) slope values, and (<b>c</b>) aspect values for comparison of each model.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 13045 KiB  
Article
A Sequence-to-Sequence Transformer Model for Satellite Retrieval of Aerosol Optical and Microphysical Parameters from Space
by Luo Zhang, Haoran Gu, Zhengqiang Li, Zhenhai Liu, Ying Zhang, Yisong Xie, Zihan Zhang, Zhe Ji, Zhiyu Li and Chaoyu Yan
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4659; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244659 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 297
Abstract
Aerosol optical and microphysical properties determine their radiative capabilities, climatic impacts, and health effects. Satellite remote sensing is a crucial tool for obtaining aerosol parameters on a global scale. However, traditional physical and statistical retrieval methods face bottlenecks in data mining capacity as [...] Read more.
Aerosol optical and microphysical properties determine their radiative capabilities, climatic impacts, and health effects. Satellite remote sensing is a crucial tool for obtaining aerosol parameters on a global scale. However, traditional physical and statistical retrieval methods face bottlenecks in data mining capacity as the volume of satellite observation information increases rapidly. Artificial intelligence methods are increasingly applied to aerosol parameter retrieval, yet most current approaches focus on end-to-end single-parameter retrieval without considering the inherent relationships among multiple aerosol properties. In this study, we propose a sequence-to-sequence aerosol parameter joint retrieval algorithm based on the transformer model S2STM. Unlike conventional end-to-end single-parameter retrieval methods, this algorithm leverages the encoding–decoding capabilities of the transformer model, coupling multi-source data such as polarized satellite, meteorological, model, and surface characteristics, and incorporates a physically coherent consistency loss function. This approach transforms traditional single-parameter numerical regression into a sequence-to-sequence relationship mapping. We applied this algorithm to global observations from the Chinese polarimetric satellite (the Particulate Observing Scanning Polarimeter, POSP) and simultaneously retrieved multiple key aerosol optical and microphysical parameters. Event analyses, including dust and pollution episodes, demonstrate the method’s responsiveness in hotspot regions and events. The retrieval results show good agreement with ground-based observation products. This method is also adaptable to satellite instruments with various configurations (e.g., multi-wavelength, multi-angle, and multi-dimensional polarization) and can further improve its spatiotemporal generalization performance by enhancing the spatial balance of ground station training datasets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Installation diagram of GF5-02 satellite polarization instruments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the S2STM structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of model accuracy metrics under different input feature parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatter plots of S2STM model retrieval results validated against AERONET and SONET data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Global aerosol characteristics distribution and comparison with MODIS products. (<b>a</b>) Terra MODIS DTB AOD at 550 nm, (b) Terra MODIS DT AOD at 550 nm, (c) Terra MODIS DB AOD at 550 nm, (d) POSP retrieved AOD at 550 nm, (e) POSP retrieved <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>V</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (f) POSP retrieved <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>V</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (g) POSP retrieved SSA at 670 nm, (h) POSP retrieved <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> at 670 nm, and (i) POSP retrieved <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> at 670 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-16-04659-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a> but showing the global distribution of various parameters for each season in 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Satellite remote sensing retrieval results of aerosol parameters over the Indian region on 21 April 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Satellite remote sensing retrieval results of aerosol parameters over the Amazon rainforest region on 1 September 2022.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 14796 KiB  
Article
Geology of the Mulkhura River Valley, Georgian Caucasus
by Roman M. Kumladze, Levan G. Tielidze, Mamia Gamkrelidze, Simon J. Cook and Anzor Giorgadze
Geosciences 2024, 14(12), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14120341 (registering DOI) - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 327
Abstract
Geological mapping provides vital information about the structure, evolution, natural resource potential, and geohazards of a specific area. The role of geological mapping is especially valuable for mountainous countries like Georgia. In this context, we present a geological map of the Mulkhura River [...] Read more.
Geological mapping provides vital information about the structure, evolution, natural resource potential, and geohazards of a specific area. The role of geological mapping is especially valuable for mountainous countries like Georgia. In this context, we present a geological map of the Mulkhura River Valley in the Georgian Caucasus (43°3′ N, 42°52′ E) with accompanying cross-sections at a scale of 1:30,000, covering approximately 220 km2. The geological information in the map is based on a comprehensive review of previously published geological maps and literature, combined with original analysis of satellite imagery and hitherto unpublished field data. The extensive spatial coverage and accompanying cross-sections provide detailed insights into the structure of the region. This new map will serve as a foundation for future geological research, hazard management, and resource exploration in the area, as well as for geoconservation to develop the national geotourism industry in this region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the Mulkhura River Valley relative to the Greater Caucasus (source: ASTER DEM, 2011).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Physical map of the Mulkhura River Valley (source: ALOS PALSAR DEM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified final map. For detailed information, please see the main map. (<b>b</b>) Close view of the detailed mapping. See main map in the <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00341" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials</a> for legend description.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tviberi and (<b>b</b>) Tsaneri River Valleys, Mulkhura River basin (photos by L. Tielidze, September 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Seri and Asmashi Glaciers, Tviberi River Valley (photo by L. Tielidze, September 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Ughviri Range between Enguri and Mulkhura River Valleys (photo by L. Tielidze, September 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Modern glacial moraines and deposits. Dzinali Glacier forefield (photo by L. Tielidze, September 2024).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop