[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (329)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = nitrate leaching

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 24487 KiB  
Article
Upcycling of Waste Durian Peel into Valued Fe/N Co-Doped Porous Materials as Peroxymonosulfate Activator for Terramycin Oxidation
by Kewang Zheng, Rui Liu, Lihang Shen, Wei Li and Caiqin Qin
Molecules 2025, 30(5), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051005 - 21 Feb 2025
Viewed by 167
Abstract
Nitrogen-doped graphene-coated Fe nanoparticles (EC@N6Fe0.6-700) were synthesized through the pyrolysis of a durian peel-supported urea ferric salt mixture. These materials were subsequently utilized to activate peroxymonosulfate (PMS) for oxidation of terramycin (TEC). The incorporation of an optimal amount of [...] Read more.
Nitrogen-doped graphene-coated Fe nanoparticles (EC@N6Fe0.6-700) were synthesized through the pyrolysis of a durian peel-supported urea ferric salt mixture. These materials were subsequently utilized to activate peroxymonosulfate (PMS) for oxidation of terramycin (TEC). The incorporation of an optimal amount of urea and ferric nitrate during the synthesis of materials significantly improves the catalytic activity of the resulting catalysts after pyrolysis. Using EC@N6Fe0.6-700 catalyst at a concentration of 0.10 g L−1, 98.55% oxidation of 20 mg L−1 TEC is achieved within 60 min. Additionally, EC@N6Fe0.6-700 exhibits exceptionally low metal leaching, with levels remaining below 0.25 mg L−1. The EC@N6Fe0.6-700 shows remarkable stability during oxidation and effectively resists interference, reusability, and robust stability throughout the oxidation process. The mechanism of the EC@N6Fe0.6-700/PMS/TEC system is determined, and the 1O2 is the main reactive oxygen species (ROSs). The XPS analysis confirms that the primary active sites are Fe0, as well as nitrogen-doped regions within the carbon matrix. This research demonstrates that by integrating iron and nitrogen with durian peel, it is possible to develop a PMS activator with satisfactory oxidation performance for the degradation of environmental pollutants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Chemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>SEM image of EC-700 (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>); EC@N<sub>6</sub>-700 (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>); EC@N<sub>6</sub>Fe<sub>0.6</sub>-700 (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>TEM (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); HRTEM (<b>c</b>); HAADF-STEM (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>); elemental mapping (<b>f</b>–<b>i</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>XRD (<b>a</b>), Raman (<b>b</b>), N<sub>2</sub> adsorption–desorption isotherms (<b>c</b>), pore size (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) urea content on adsorption of TEC, (<b>b</b>) urea content on degradation of TEC, (<b>c</b>) Fe content on adsorption of TEC, (<b>d</b>) Fe content on degradation of TEC, (<b>e</b>) carbonization temperature on adsorption of TEC, (<b>f</b>) carbonization temperature on degradation of TEC, Conditions: [TEC]<sub>0</sub> = 20 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, [catalyst]<sub>0</sub> = 0.10 g L<sup>−1</sup>, [PMS]<sub>0</sub> = 0.15 g L<sup>−1</sup>, temperature = 25 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) urea content on adsorption of TEC, (<b>b</b>) urea content on degradation of TEC, (<b>c</b>) Fe content on adsorption of TEC, (<b>d</b>) Fe content on degradation of TEC, (<b>e</b>) carbonization temperature on adsorption of TEC, (<b>f</b>) carbonization temperature on degradation of TEC, Conditions: [TEC]<sub>0</sub> = 20 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, [catalyst]<sub>0</sub> = 0.10 g L<sup>−1</sup>, [PMS]<sub>0</sub> = 0.15 g L<sup>−1</sup>, temperature = 25 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dose of catalyst (<b>a</b>). PMS (<b>b</b>). Temperature (<b>c</b>). TEC concentration (<b>d</b>). pH (<b>e</b>). Zeta potential (<b>f</b>). Conditions: [TEC]<sub>0</sub> = 20 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, [EC@N<sub>6</sub>Fe<sub>0.6</sub>-700]<sub>0</sub> = 0.10 g L<sup>−1</sup>, [PMS]<sub>0</sub> = 0.15 g L<sup>−1</sup>, temperature = 25 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL<sup>−1</sup>, (<b>b</b>) SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, (<b>c</b>) HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, (<b>d</b>) HPO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, (<b>e</b>) HA, and (<b>f</b>) actual water. Conditions: [TEC]<sub>0</sub> = 20 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, [EC@N<sub>6</sub>Fe<sub>0.6</sub>-700]<sub>0</sub> = 0.10 g L<sup>−1</sup>, [PMS]<sub>0</sub> = 0.15 g L<sup>−1</sup>, temperature = 25 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Universality (<b>a</b>), reusability (<b>b</b>), Fe leaching (<b>c</b>), VSM (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) XPS, (<b>b</b>) fresh of Fe 2p spectrum, (<b>c</b>) used of Fe 2p spectrum, (<b>d</b>) fresh of N 1s spectrum, (<b>e</b>) used of N 1s spectrum, (<b>f</b>) relative content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Quenching experiments (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EPR spectra (<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>). D2O exchange experiment (<b>i</b>). EIS (<b>k</b>). IC (<b>l</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Quenching experiments (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EPR spectra (<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>). D2O exchange experiment (<b>i</b>). EIS (<b>k</b>). IC (<b>l</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Degradation pathways of TEC (path A, B, and C).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5363 KiB  
Article
Leaching of a Cs- and Sr-Rich Waste Stream Immobilized in Alkali-Activated Matrices
by Lander Frederickx, Emile Mukiza and Quoc Tri Phung
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1756; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041756 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 227
Abstract
In the context of the disposal of spent radioactive fuel, heat-emitting radionuclides such as Cs and Sr are of utmost concern, as they have a major influence on the distance at which disposal galleries should be spaced apart and, thus, the cost of [...] Read more.
In the context of the disposal of spent radioactive fuel, heat-emitting radionuclides such as Cs and Sr are of utmost concern, as they have a major influence on the distance at which disposal galleries should be spaced apart and, thus, the cost of a disposal facility. Therefore, certain scenarios investigate the partitioning and transmutation of spent fuel to optimize the disposability of both Cs- and Sr-rich waste streams and the remaining fractions. In this study, the Cs- and Sr-rich waste stream, a nitrate-based solution, was immobilized in metakaolin and blast furnace slag-based alkali-activated matrices. These matrices were chosen for immobilization because they are known to offer advantages in terms of durability and/or heat resistance compared with traditional cementitious materials. The goal of this study is to develop an optimal recipe for the retention of Cs and Sr. For this purpose, recipes were developed following a design-of-experiments approach by varying the water-to-binder ratio, precursor, and waste loading while respecting matrix constraints. Leaching tests in deionized water showed that the metakaolin-based matrix was superior for the combined retention of both Cs and Sr. The optimal recipe was further tested under accelerated leaching conditions in an ammonium nitrate solution, which revealed that the leaching of Cs and Sr remained within reasonable limits. These results confirm that alkali-activated materials can be effectively used for the immobilization and long-term retention of heat-emitting radionuclides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Waste and Recycling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the compressive strength (Fc) after 7 days (<b>a</b>) and 28 days (<b>b</b>) of curing and the flexural strength (Fd) after 28 days of curing (<b>c</b>). ‘Low’ and ‘High’ refer to the waste loading of Cs- or Sr-nitrate. For the MK-based waste forms with Cs and Sr and for the BFS-based waste form with Cs ‘Low’ and ‘High’ refer to 2 and 5 wt.%, while 2 and 3 wt.% confer to the ‘Low’ and ‘High’ waste loadings of Sr in the BFS-based waste form. Where multiple subsamples are available for testing, error bars indicating uncertainty are added.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Percentage of Cs (<b>a</b>) and Sr (<b>b</b>) leached from the waste forms (respectively, MK- and BFS-based) by immersion in deionized water for one month.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the leaching behavior of Cs in metakaolin-based waste forms with different W/B ratios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Plot of the cumulative fraction leached (CFL) as a function of the square root of time for the low (<b>a</b>) and high (<b>b</b>) waste loading varieties of the metakaolin geopolymer waste form immersed in 6 M of NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Microscopic maps of the low-waste loading sample: (<b>a</b>) SEM image; (<b>b</b>) qualitative phase segmented map; and (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>) EDX maps showing the spatial distribution of, respectively, Cs, Sr, Ba, and Rb. All these results indicate that, while Cs and Sr leach from their waste form, the overall leaching rates are acceptable even under accelerated conditions. It can be hypothesized that the leaching rate of divalent Sr is, in reality, lower than that measured by the accelerated experiment because of the high specificity of the medium for divalent cations; however, other accelerated tests are not carried out.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Microscopic maps of the low-waste loading sample: (<b>a</b>) SEM image; (<b>b</b>) qualitative phase segmented map; and (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>) EDX maps showing the spatial distribution of, respectively, Cs, Sr, Ba, and Rb.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Microscopic maps of the low-waste loading sample: (<b>a</b>) SEM image; (<b>b</b>) qualitative phase segmented map; and (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>) EDX maps showing the spatial distribution of, respectively, Cs, Sr, Ba, and Rb.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 3615 KiB  
Article
Impact of Polymer-Coated Controlled-Release Fertilizer on Maize Growth, Production, and Soil Nitrate in Sandy Soils
by Morgan Morrow, Vivek Sharma, Rakesh K. Singh, Jonathan Adam Watson, Gabriel Maltais-Landry and Robert Conway Hochmuth
Agronomy 2025, 15(2), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020455 - 13 Feb 2025
Viewed by 460
Abstract
Polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers’ (CRFs) unique nutrient release mechanism has the potential to mitigate the leaching of mobile soil nutrients, such as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). The study aimed to evaluate the capacity of a polymer-coated CRFs to maintain maize (Zea mays L.) [...] Read more.
Polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers’ (CRFs) unique nutrient release mechanism has the potential to mitigate the leaching of mobile soil nutrients, such as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). The study aimed to evaluate the capacity of a polymer-coated CRFs to maintain maize (Zea mays L.) crop growth/health indicators and production goals, while reducing NO3-N leaching risks compared to conventional (CONV) fertilizers in North Florida. Four CRF rates (168, 224, 280, 336 kg N ha−1) were assessed against a no nitrogen (N) application and the current University of Florida Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) recommended CONV (269 kg N ha−1) fertilizer rate. All CRF treatments, even the lowest CRF rate (168 kg N ha−1), produced yields, leaf tissue N concentrations, plant heights, aboveground biomasses (AGB), and leaf area index (LAI) significantly (p < 0.05) greater than or similar to the CONV fertilizer treatment. Additionally, in 2022, the CONV fertilizer treatment resulted in increases in late-season movement of soil NO3-N into highly leachable areas of the soil profile (60–120 cm), while none of the CRF treatments did. However, back-to-back leaching rainfall (>76.2 mm over three days) events in the 2023 growing season masked any trends as NO3-N was likely completely flushed from the system. The results of this two-year study suggest that polymer-coated CRFs can achieve desirable crop growth, crop health, and production goals, while also having the potential to reduce the late-season leaching potential of NO3-N; however, more research is needed to fully capture and quantify the movement of NO3-N through the soil profile. Correlation and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that CRF performance was significantly influenced by environmental factors such as rainfall and temperature. In 2022, temperature-driven nitrogen release aligned with crop uptake, supporting higher yields and minimizing NO3-N movement. In 2023, however, rainfall-driven variability led to an increase in NO3-N leaching and masked the benefits of CRF treatments. These analyses provided critical insights into the relationships between environmental factors and CRF performance, emphasizing the importance of adaptive fertilizer management under varying climatic conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conventional and Alternative Fertilization of Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical weather data depicting lines of maximum (red), minimum (blue), and average (grey) temperatures along with bars of total daily rainfall (orange) throughout 2022 and 2023 maize growing seasons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Crop health and growth parameters including (<b>A</b>) plant height, (<b>B</b>) leaf area index, (<b>C</b>) leaf tissue nitrogen, and (<b>D</b>) aboveground biomass (AGB) for 2022 and 2023 maize growing seasons across fertilizer treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil nitrate-nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>-N, mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) at various soil profile depths including (<b>A</b>) 0–30 cm, (<b>B</b>) 30–60 cm, (<b>C</b>) 60–90 cm, and (<b>D</b>) 90–120 cm for the 2022 and 2023 maize growing seasons across fertilizer treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The mean soil nitrate-nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>-N) within the 60–120 cm soil profile for 2022 and 2023 maize growing seasons; this figure shows the color gradient of the growth stages, with the youngest stage (V6) being the darkest purple and progressively getting lighter until the R5 growth stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Violin plot graph of grain yield under different nitrogen fertilizer treatments for 2022 and 2023 maize growing seasons. Treatments with same letters within each year are not significantly different at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A correlation matrix illustrating the relationships between climatic factors, soil moisture, nitrate-nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>-N) concentrations at different depths, and plant growth attributes at the vegetative (V12) and reproductive (R3 and R5) growth stages during the 2022 and 2023 maize growing seasons. The variables include soil moisture (VWC) at 30 cm, 60 cm, and 90 cm depths (VWC_30, VWC_60, VWC_90, respectively); NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations at three soil depths (NO<sub>3</sub>-N_30: 0–30 cm, NO<sub>3</sub>-N_60: 30–60 cm, NO<sub>3</sub>-N_90: 60–90 cm); and plant growth parameters including plant height (Height) and the leaf area index (LAI). Positive correlations are shown in red, while negative correlations are represented in blue, with the intensity of the color corresponding to the strength of the correlation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot showing the relationships between soil nitrate-nitrogen concentrations (NO<sub>3</sub>_30, NO<sub>3</sub>_60, NO<sub>3</sub>_90), soil moisture (VWC_30, VWC_60, VWC_90), cumulative rainfall (RAIN_sum, RAIN_cum), and crop performance metrics (LAI, height, yield) during the 2022 (red) and 2023 (blue) maize growing seasons.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 662 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness of Voluntary Nutrient Management Measures to Reduce Nitrate Leaching on Dairy Farms Using Soil N Surplus as an Indicator
by J. Verloop, C. van den Brink and J. Gielen
Water 2025, 17(3), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030455 - 6 Feb 2025
Viewed by 417
Abstract
A pilot study with 18 dairy farms in recharge areas of five vulnerable drinking water abstractions in the Dutch province of Overijssel aimed to reduce nitrate leaching risks to the upper meter of groundwater through improved farm management. The pilot employed a voluntary, [...] Read more.
A pilot study with 18 dairy farms in recharge areas of five vulnerable drinking water abstractions in the Dutch province of Overijssel aimed to reduce nitrate leaching risks to the upper meter of groundwater through improved farm management. The pilot employed a voluntary, mutual gain approach, promoting measures that enhanced both nutrient efficiency and groundwater quality. Over the research period (2011–2017), nitrogen surpluses on the soil balance declined significantly from 153 to 96 kg N per ha per year, achieving the target of 100 kg N per ha per year. Despite this decline, average nitrate concentrations in the upper meter of groundwater fluctuated annually, showing no significant reduction in grassland but a noticeable decrease in maize. Economic evaluation showed that relative fodder profitability (RFP) increased over time, suggesting positive financial effects of implemented measures, as acknowledged by participating farmers. However, the adoption of measures perceived as complex or less financially rewarding remained limited, highlighting the challenges of relying solely on voluntary implementation. The absence of farm-specific feedback on nitrate leaching emerged as a critical limitation, emphasizing the need for additional monitoring tools, such as residual soil nitrogen assessments, to provide actionable insights at the farm or field level. These findings underscore the potential for further reducing nitrate leaching through enhanced feedback systems, precise execution of measures, and collaborative efforts integrating farmer expertise and scientific knowledge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Human Impact on Groundwater Environment, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematized relation between Fodder Profit (FP) and production intensity (PI); black line: hypothetical benchmark, black dot: farm 1 and black square: farm 2, further explanation cf. text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dynamics of the N surplus on the whole farm soil balance, open squares: average of all pilot farms (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 16; mean sd 50, range 39–66) and black dots: FADN (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 97; mean sd 76, range 59–101) farms per year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamics of the N surplus on the whole farm soil balance, means of all farms (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 16; grassland: mean sd = 59, range 50–73); maize: mean sd 67, range 36–97).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 6470 KiB  
Article
Dynamic Modeling of Soil Water Dynamics and Nitrogen Species Transport with Multi-Crop Rotations Under Variable-Saturated Conditions
by Vilim Filipović, Dragutin Petošić, Ivan Mustać, Igor Bogunović, Hailong He and Lana Filipović
Land 2025, 14(2), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020315 - 5 Feb 2025
Viewed by 467
Abstract
Excessive application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers in agriculture poses significant environmental risks, notably nitrate leaching into groundwater. This study evaluates soil water dynamics and the transport of urea, ammonium, and nitrate under variable-saturated conditions in a long-term experimental field in Croatia, Europe. Utilizing [...] Read more.
Excessive application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers in agriculture poses significant environmental risks, notably nitrate leaching into groundwater. This study evaluates soil water dynamics and the transport of urea, ammonium, and nitrate under variable-saturated conditions in a long-term experimental field in Croatia, Europe. Utilizing HYDRUS-1D and HYDRUS-2D models, we simulated water flow and nitrogen transformation and transport across six lysimeter-monitored locations over four years (2019–2023), incorporating diverse crop rotations and N addition. Key modeled processes included nitrification, urea hydrolysis, and nitrate leaching, integrating field-measured parameters and climatic conditions. The models achieved high reliability, with R2 values for water flow ranging from 0.58 to 0.97 and for nitrate transport from 0.13 to 0.97; however, some cases reported lower reliability. Results revealed that nitrate leaching was influenced by precipitation patterns, soil moisture, crop growth stages, and fertilization timing. Peak nitrate losses were observed during early crop growth and post-harvest periods when elevated soil moisture and reduced plant uptake coincided. The findings highlight the importance of optimizing nitrogen application strategies to balance crop productivity and environmental protection. This research demonstrates the effectiveness of numerical modeling as a tool for sustainable nitrogen management and groundwater quality preservation in agricultural systems. It also indicates the need for further development by capturing some of the processes such as identification in the N cycle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Land, Soil and Water)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scheme of installed zero-tension lysimeter system at 0.5 m depth at the Biđ experimental site in Eastern Croatia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Measured and simulated cumulative values of water outflow (leachate) from lysimeters at locations L1, L3, and L5 during the 2019–2023 period, modeled using HYDRUS-1D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Measured and simulated cumulative values of water outflow (leachate) from lysimeters at locations L2, L4, and L6 during the 2019–2023 period, modeled using HYDRUS-1D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Measured and simulated cumulative nitrate outflow (leachate) from lysimeters at locations L1, L3, and L5 during the 2019–2023 period, modeled using HYDRUS-1D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measured and simulated cumulative nitrate outflow (leachate) from lysimeters at locations L2, L4, and L6 during the 2019–2023 period, modeled using HYDRUS-1D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pressure head distribution (HYDRUS-2D model) in the soil profile at L6 during 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated nitrate concentration distribution (HYDRUS-2D model) in the soil profile at L6 during 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Simulations of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> movement through the soil profile during the year 2023 at different time intervals (T0—0 days, T1—60 days, T2—121 days, T3—182 days, T4—243 days, T5—304 days, and T6—365 days).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 7878 KiB  
Article
Carboxyethylsilanetriol-Functionalized Al-MIL-53-Supported Palladium Catalyst for Enhancing Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction
by Yucang Liang, Xin Ning and Yanzhong Zhen
Molecules 2025, 30(3), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030656 - 1 Feb 2025
Viewed by 711
Abstract
The application of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) has attracted increasing attention in organic synthesis. The modification of MOFs can efficiently tailor the structure and improve the property for meeting ongoing demand in various applications, such as the alteration of gas adsorption and separation, catalytic [...] Read more.
The application of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) has attracted increasing attention in organic synthesis. The modification of MOFs can efficiently tailor the structure and improve the property for meeting ongoing demand in various applications, such as the alteration of gas adsorption and separation, catalytic activity, stability, and sustainability or reusability. In this study, carboxyethylsilanetriol (CEST) disodium salt was used as a dual-functional ligand for modified Al-MIL-53 to fabricate CEST-functionalized Al-MIL-53 samples through a hydrothermal reaction of aluminum nitrate, terephthalic acid, and CEST disodium salt by varying the molar ratio of CEST to terephthalic acid and keeping a constant molar ratio of Al3+/-COOH of 1:1. The structure, composition, morphology, pore feature, and stability were characterized by XRD, different spectroscopies, electron microscopy, N2 physisorption, and thermogravimetric analysis. With increasing CEST content, CEST-Al-MIL-53 still preserves an Al-MIL-53-like structure, but the microstructure changed compared with pure Al-MIL-53 due to the integration of CEST. Such a CEST-Al-MIL-53 was used as the support to load Pd particles and afford a catalyst Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 for Suzuki–Miyaura C-C cross-coupling reaction of aryl halides and phenylboronic acid under basic conditions. The resulting Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 showed a high catalytic activity compared with Pd/Al-MIL-53, due to the nanofibrous structure of silicon species-integrated CEST-Al-MIL-53. The nanofiber microstructure undergoes a remarkable transformation into intricate 3D cross-networks during catalytic reaction, which enables the leachable Pd particles to orientally redeposit and inlay into these networks as the monodisperse spheres and thereby effectively preventing Pd particles from aggregation and leaching, therefore demonstrating a high catalytic performance, long-term stability, and enhanced reusability. Obviously, the integration of CEST into MOFs can effectively prevent the leaching of active Pd species and ensure the re-deposition during catalysis. Moreover, catalytic performance strongly depended on catalyst dosage, temperature, time, solvent, and the type of the substituted group on benzene ring. This work further extends the catalytic application of hybrid metal–organic frameworks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Chemistry)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) XRD patterns of samples CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>) with various CEST contents, Al-MIL-53 (<b>4</b>), Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>), Pd/Al-MIL-53 (<b>6</b>), and simulated as-synthesized Al-MIL-53. The diffraction peaks of crystalline metallic Pd are marked as “#”. (<b>b</b>) Infrared resonance spectra of sample CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>2</b>), Al-MIL-53 (<b>4</b>), Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>), and Pd/Al-MIL-53 (<b>6</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) SEM and (<b>b</b>) TEM image of sample <b>2</b>. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) SEM images of sample <b>4</b> with different magnifications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectra of CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>2</b>) and Al-MIL-53 (<b>4</b>); (<b>b</b>) <sup>29</sup>Si NMR spectrum of CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>2</b>); (<b>c</b>) TGA curves of samples CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>) and Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) N<sub>2</sub> physisorption isotherms of CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>) and Al-MIL-53 (<b>4</b>) activated at different temperatures. (<b>b</b>) N<sub>2</sub> physisorption isotherms of Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>) and Pd/Al-MIL-53 (<b>6</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) SEM and (<b>b</b>) TEM images of sample Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>). The inset is HRTEM images in (<b>b</b>). (<b>c</b>) Scanning electron microscopy and EDX spectroscopic elemental mappings of C, O, Si, Al, and Pd in sample <b>5</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) XPS survey scan spectrum and high-resolution XPS spectra of sample Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>) for (<b>b</b>) Al 2p, (<b>c</b>) C 1s, (<b>d</b>) O 1s, (<b>e</b>) Si 2p, (<b>f</b>) Pd 3d, and (<b>g</b>) Cl 2p.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Time-dependent catalytic performance of catalysts Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>) and Pd/Al-MIL-53 (<b>6</b>) for the C-C cross-coupling reaction of iodobenzene and phenylboronic acid in the presence of K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> in ethanol; (<b>b</b>) the fitted plots of −ln(C<sub>t</sub>/C<sub>0</sub>) versus initial reaction time in the range of 0.5~5 h for catalysts <b>5</b> and <b>6</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The catalytic conversion of Suzuki–Miyaura C-C cross-coupling reaction of iodobenzene and phenylboronic acid with number of reuse cycles over Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>) and Pd/Al-MIL-53 (<b>6</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) SEM and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) TEM images of the sample Pd/CEST-Al-MIL-53 (<b>5</b>) after the fifth recycled run. (<b>e</b>–<b>i</b>) The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic elemental mappings of Al, O, Pd, and Si according to image (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) SEM and (<b>b</b>) TEM image of Pd-Al-MIL-53 after third recycling run. (<b>c</b>) SEM image of Pd/Al-MIL-53 before catalysis.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2718 KiB  
Article
Controlled-Release Fertilizer Improving Paddy Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency by Reducing Soil Residual Nitrogen and Leaching Losses in the Yellow River Irrigation Area
by Jingjing He, Ying Wang, Hong Li, Junhua Ma, Xiang Yue, Xiangyu Liang, Yu Hong, Fang Wang, Chenxia Hu and Ruliang Liu
Plants 2025, 14(3), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030408 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
The unreasonable application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer leads to high nutrient losses and severe potential of agricultural non-point source contamination, which threatens water quality in the upper Yellow River Basin. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the effects of N [...] Read more.
The unreasonable application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer leads to high nutrient losses and severe potential of agricultural non-point source contamination, which threatens water quality in the upper Yellow River Basin. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the effects of N application rates and various control measures on rice yield and N leaching in paddy fields in the Yellow River irrigation area. Four treatments were employed in this study, CK (no N fertilizer application, 0 kg N∙ha−1), CRU (controlled-release urea application, 180 kg N∙ha−1), OPT (optimal N fertilizer application, 210 kg N∙ha−1), and FP (N fertilizer application based on farmer experience, 240 kg N∙ha−1), to examine paddy yield, N use efficiency (NUE), N concentrations in leaching water at various soil depths, and N contents along the 0–100 cm depth of the soil profile. The results indicated that the amount of TN leached was 25.14–48.04 kg∙ha−1 after different N applications, and the TN leaching coefficients of FP, OPT, and CRU were 10.88%, 11.27%, and 7.07%. Compared to FP and OPT, the CRU significantly reduced the concentrations of TN, ammonium N (NH4+-N), and nitrate N (NO3-N) in the surface and soil water, with average TN leaching decreasing by 31.55% and 27.35% in the years 2022 and 2023, respectively. NO3-N was identified as the primary form of N leached from the paddy fields. Compared to FP and OPT treatments, the CRU treatment increased the average paddy yield by 19.99–20.66% and improved the average NUE by 19.04–16.38%. This study revealed that the application of high amounts of N positively affected soil N leaching, and controlled-release urea demonstrates superior efficacy compared to conventional fertilization. The application of controlled-release urea at a rate of 180 kg N∙ha−1 not only ensures a good paddy yield but also reduce N losses, which should be recommended to local farmers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water and Nitrogen Management in the Soil–Crop System (3rd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Trends in the TN, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N concentrations of surface water in paddy fields under different N fertilizer treatments for two years. Dynamics of TN (<b>a</b>), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>b</b>), and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>c</b>) concentrations of surface water in 2022; dynamics of TN (<b>d</b>), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>e</b>), and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>f</b>) concentrations of surface water in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Trends in the TN, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N concentrations of the leaching water at the 20 cm soil depth in paddy fields under different N fertilizer treatments for two years. Dynamics of TN (<b>a</b>), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>b</b>), and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>c</b>) concentrations of the leaching water at the 20 cm soil depth in 2022; dynamics of TN (<b>d</b>), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>e</b>), and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>f</b>) concentrations of surface water in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Trends in the TN, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N concentrations of the leaching water at the 60 cm soil depth in paddy fields under different N fertilizer treatments for two years. Dynamics of TN (<b>a</b>), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>b</b>), and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>c</b>) concentrations of the leaching water at the 60 cm soil depth in 2022; dynamics of TN (<b>d</b>), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>e</b>), and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>f</b>) concentrations of surface water in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Vertical distributions of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>a</b>) and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>c</b>) contents in 2022 along the 0~100 cm depth soil profile after paddy harvest. Vertical distributions of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N (<b>b</b>) and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N (<b>d</b>) contents in 2023 along the 0~100 cm depth soil profile after paddy harvest. The horizontal bars mean standard deviations of the means CK, CRU, OPT, and FP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA1, PCA2) showing trait vectors (soil organic matter, available phosphorus, available potassium, available N, total N, total N leaching, total N uptake) of N leaching and physical–chemical properties of the soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Irrigation and precipitation during the paddy growth period. The amount of irrigation water applied was determined via an electromagnetic flowmeter, and the precipitation data were obtained from the China Meteorological Network.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 906 KiB  
Article
Zootechnical and Municipal Solid Waste Digestates: Effects on Soil Nitrogen Mineralization and Kinetics
by Gabriella Rossi, Claudio Beni, Silvia Socciarelli and Ulderico Neri
Biomass 2025, 5(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5010005 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 565
Abstract
Soil fertilization with fertilizers derived from renewable sources is a topic of great interest in terms of the sustainable management of organic waste. To optimize the management of nitrogen supplied to the soil with digestates, it is necessary to deepen knowledge on the [...] Read more.
Soil fertilization with fertilizers derived from renewable sources is a topic of great interest in terms of the sustainable management of organic waste. To optimize the management of nitrogen supplied to the soil with digestates, it is necessary to deepen knowledge on the process of mineralization of organic nitrogen over time. In this research, a laboratory incubation system was utilized to study the impact of various digestate sources on nitrogen mineralization processes in soils and nitrogen mineralization kinetics. Six types of digestates of different origins and composition were administered to soil and the soil samples were placed under controlled conditions. The release of N was determined by measuring ammonium-N and nitrate-N concentrations in leachates during a 12-week period of incubation. The nonlinear regression technique was used to fit the cumulative leaching of total N to the Stanford and Smith first-order kinetic model during the incubation period. The results showed that the differences between digestates, nitrogen and organic carbon concentration, and C/N ratio influenced both ammonification and nitrification processes in the soil and the nitrogen mineralization kinetics. The processing of the statistical data highlighted that the potentially mineralizable nitrogen (MPN) followed first-order kinetics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Cumulative concentrations (mg N kg<sup>−1</sup> of dry soil) of mineralized N (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N + NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N). Bars with different letters are significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey’s test. Error bars describe the standard error of the mean (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Curve fit plots showing experimental data (as an average of three replicates) and predicted values according to the first-order kinetics model against incubation time (Week) of the net cumulative inorganic nitrogen (mg kg<sup>−1</sup> dry soil). Ammonium sulfate (AS), digested pig slurry as such (PS), digested pig slurry–solid fraction (PF), digested bovine manure (BM), digested OFMSW (DO), dried digested OFMSW (DD), and digested and composted OFMSW (DC).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 480 KiB  
Article
New Insights into Fertilisation with Animal Manure for Annual Double-Cropping Systems in Nitrate-Vulnerable Zones of Northeastern Spain
by Dolores Quilez, Monica Guillén, Marta Vallés, Arturo Daudén and Beatriz Moreno-García
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010142 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 694
Abstract
Maize double-cropping production systems in Mediterranean areas have a great nitrogen extraction capacity and high nitrogen (N) requirements. This study aims to assess whether in these farming systems, animal manure can be applied, using adequate management practices, at levels exceeding the maximum annual [...] Read more.
Maize double-cropping production systems in Mediterranean areas have a great nitrogen extraction capacity and high nitrogen (N) requirements. This study aims to assess whether in these farming systems, animal manure can be applied, using adequate management practices, at levels exceeding the maximum annual amount of livestock manure established in the European Nitrate Directive for vulnerable zones (170 kg N ha−1) without increasing the risk of water nitrate contamination. We compare the risk of nitrate leaching under two fertilisation strategies, one with synthetic fertilisers and the second with a maximised application of pig slurry, exceeding the limits of the EU Nitrate Directive, in two soil types. Crop yields, N extraction and nitrate concentrations below the crop root zone were not affected by the fertilisation strategies at each site. The results show that pig slurry can be applied above the limit of 170 kg N ha−1 under the conditions of the study, up to 360 kg N ha−1, without increasing the risk for nitrate leaching. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Average nitrate concentration in the soil solution at the different sampling times in the two treatments (P: pig slurry, M: synthetic fertiliser) in the Barluenga (1.2 m depth) and Torremira (0.45 m depth) fields.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2360 KiB  
Article
Deep-Learning-Driven Insights into Nitrogen Leaching for Sustainable Land Use and Agricultural Practices
by Caixia Hu, Jie Li, Yaxu Pang, Lan Luo, Fang Liu, Wenhao Wu, Yan Xu, Houyu Li, Bingcang Tan and Guilong Zhang
Land 2025, 14(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010069 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 586
Abstract
Nitrate leaching from soil presents a significant threat to soil health, as it can result in nutrient loss, soil acidification, and structural damage. It is crucial to quantify the spatial heterogeneity of nitrate leaching and its drivers. A total of 509 observational data [...] Read more.
Nitrate leaching from soil presents a significant threat to soil health, as it can result in nutrient loss, soil acidification, and structural damage. It is crucial to quantify the spatial heterogeneity of nitrate leaching and its drivers. A total of 509 observational data points regarding nitrate leaching in northern China were collected, capturing the spatial and temporal variations across crops such as winter wheat, maize, and greenhouse vegetables. A machine learning (ML) model for predicting nitrate leaching was then developed, with the random forest (RF) model outperforming the support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and convolutional neural network (CNN) models, achieving an R2 of 0.75. However, the performance improved significantly after integrating the four models with Bayesian optimization (all models had R2 > 0.56), which realized quantitative prediction capabilities for nitrate leaching loss concentrations. Moreover, the XGBoost model exhibited the highest fitting accuracy and the smallest error in estimating nitrate leaching losses, with an R2 value of 0.79 and an average absolute error (MAE) of 3.87 kg/ha. Analyses of the feature importance and SHAP values in the optimal XGBoost model identified soil organic matter, chemical nitrogen fertilizer input, and water input (including rainfall and irrigation) as the main indicators of nitrate leaching loss. The ML-based modeling method developed overcomes the difficulty of the determination of the functional relationship between nitrate loss intensity and its influencing factors, providing a data-driven solution for estimating nitrate–nitrogen loss in farmlands in North China and strengthening sustainable agricultural practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Raw data and processed data QQ plots of average annual temperature (<b>A</b>), average annual rainfall (<b>B</b>), soil type (<b>C</b>), chemical N fertilizer input (<b>D</b>), organic N fertilizer input (<b>E</b>), irrigation amount (<b>F</b>), irrigation methods (<b>G</b>), soil total N (<b>H</b>), soil organic matter (<b>I</b>), soil pH (<b>J</b>), soil bulk density (<b>K</b>) and soil clay (<b>L</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pearson’s correlation matrix of independent variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of R<sup>2</sup>, <span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>, and <span class="html-italic">MAE</span> using the SVM (<b>A</b>), RF (<b>B</b>), XGBoost (<b>C</b>), and CNN (<b>D</b>) models for nitrate–nitrogen loss rate prediction on training and test datasets. Abbreviations: SVM, support vector machine; RF, random forest; XGBoost, extreme gradient boosting; CNN, convolutional neural network. Moving average error (<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>), root mean square error (<span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>), and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Result of Bayesian-optimized hyperparameters in SVM (<b>A</b>), RF (<b>B</b>), XGBoost (<b>C</b>), and CNN (<b>D</b>) models for nitrate–nitrogen loss rate prediction. Abbreviations: SVM, support vector machine; RF, random forest; XGBoost, extreme gradient boosting; CNN, convolutional neural network. Moving average error (<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>), root mean square error (<span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>), and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ranking of the importance of input features (<b>A</b>) and the SHAP value for a particular variable (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1817 KiB  
Article
Model-Based Valuation of Ecosystem Services Using Bio-Economic Farm Models: Insights for Designing Green Tax Policies and Payment for Ecosystem Services
by Seyed-Ali Hosseini-Yekani, Stefan Tomaczewski and Peter Zander
Agriculture 2025, 15(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010060 - 29 Dec 2024
Viewed by 688
Abstract
The integration of ecosystem services (ESs) valuation into agricultural policy frameworks is critical for fostering sustainable land management practices. This study leverages the redesigned version of the bio-economic farm model MODAM (Multi-Objective Decision Support Tool for Agro-Ecosystem Management) to estimate the shadow prices [...] Read more.
The integration of ecosystem services (ESs) valuation into agricultural policy frameworks is critical for fostering sustainable land management practices. This study leverages the redesigned version of the bio-economic farm model MODAM (Multi-Objective Decision Support Tool for Agro-Ecosystem Management) to estimate the shadow prices of ESs, enabling the derivation of demand and supply curves for nitrate leaching and soil erosion control, respectively. Two hypothetical farms in Brandenburg, Germany—a smaller, arable farm in Märkisch-Oderland and a larger, diversified farm with livestock in Oder-Spree—are analyzed to explore the heterogeneity in shadow prices and corresponding cropping patterns. The results reveal that larger farms exhibit greater elasticity in response to green taxes on nitrate use and lower costs for supplying erosion control compared to smaller farms. This study highlights the utility of shadow prices as proxies for setting green taxes and payments for ecosystem services (PESs), while emphasizing the need for differentiated policy designs to address disparities between farm types. This research underscores the potential of model-based ESs valuation to provide robust economic measures for policy design, fostering sustainable agricultural practices and ecosystem conservation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Policies toward Sustainable Farm Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Farmer’s demand curve for ESs <span class="html-italic">s</span> in year <span class="html-italic">t</span>. Adapted from Kaiser and Messer (2012) [<a href="#B17-agriculture-15-00060" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Farmer’s supply curve for ESs <span class="html-italic">d</span> in year <span class="html-italic">t</span>. Adapted from Kaiser and Messer (2012) [<a href="#B17-agriculture-15-00060" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Nitrate leaching demand curve of the hypothetical farm type in Märkisch-Oderland (Brandenburg, Germany) and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a green tax. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nitrate leaching demand curve of the hypothetical farm type in Oder-Spree (Brandenburg, Germany) and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a green tax. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Nitrate leaching demand curves of two hypothetical farm types in Märkisch-Oderland and Oder-Spree. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Erosion control supply curve of the hypothetical farm type in Märkisch-Oderland and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a PES. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Erosion control supply curve of the hypothetical farm type in Oder-Spree and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a PES. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Soil erosion control supply curves of two hypothetical farm types in Märkisch-Oderland and Oder-Spree. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 3177 KiB  
Article
Blending of Slow-Release N Fertilizer and Urea Improve Rainfed Maize Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency While Reducing Apparent N Losses
by Jinjin Guo, Hanran Yang, Yong Yuan, Pengzhou Yin, Nv Zhang, Zhizhao Lin, Qichang Ma, Qiliang Yang, Xiaogang Liu, Haidong Wang and Fucang Zhang
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010011 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 454
Abstract
Effective nitrogen (N) management practices are essential for achieving efficient and sustainable agricultural production. The purpose of this study was to improve N use efficiency (NUE) and minimize N loss by optimizing the rate and type of N fertilizer application while maintaining a [...] Read more.
Effective nitrogen (N) management practices are essential for achieving efficient and sustainable agricultural production. The purpose of this study was to improve N use efficiency (NUE) and minimize N loss by optimizing the rate and type of N fertilizer application while maintaining a high yield of maize. A two-year field experiment with U (urea), S (slow-release N fertilizer), and SU (blending of S and U) under four N application levels (N1: 90 kg ha−1, N2: 120 kg ha−1, N3: 180 kg ha−1, N4: 240 kg ha−1) was conducted to investigate their effects on ammonia (NH3) volatilization, residual soil nitrate N (NO3-N), yield, NUE, apparent N losses of rainfed maize. NH3 volatilization in SU and S were 38.46% and 16.57% lower than that in U, respectively. SU and S were found to reduce the apparent N losses by 42.98% and 62.23%. SU decreased NO3-N leaching in deep soils and increased NO3-N content in topsoil. Compared with U and S, SU significantly increased yield, plant N accumulation, and NUE. SUN4 achieved the maximum maize yield and plant N accumulation, averaging 7968.36 kg ha−1 and 166.45 kg ha−1. In addition, the high yield and NUE were obtained when the mixing ratio of S and U was 53–58% and the N application rate was 150–220 kg ha−1. The findings highlight that SU effectively reduces N losses while ensuring high yield, which could be used as one of the optimal N fertilization strategies for rainfed maize in Northwest China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Precipitation and temperature during the maize growing seasons in 2019 and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daily NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization flux of maize under different N application rates (N1 to N4) and fertilizer types (U, S, SU) in 2019 and 2020. (<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>) Daily NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization flux for each N rate and year. CK = no N application; U = urea; S = slow-release N fertilizer; SU = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7. Error bars are ±1 standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). The Y-bars on each data point should indicate SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization of maize under different N application rates (N1 to N4) and fertilizer types (U, S, SU) in 2019 and 2020. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization for each year. CK = no N application; U = urea; S = slow-release N fertilizer; SU = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7. Different letters indicate significance at the 5% level for the same year by the LSD test. Error bars are ±1 standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). The Y-bars on each data point should indicate SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Residual soil <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> content in the 0–120 cm soil layer of maize under different N application rates (N1 to N4) and N fertilizer types (U, S, SU) in 2019 and 2020. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Residual soil <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for each year. (<b>c</b>–<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> content for each N fertilizer type and year. CK = no N application; U = urea; S = slow-release N fertilizer; SU = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7. Different letters indicate significance at the 5% level for the same year by the LSD test. Error bars are ±1 standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). The Y-bars on each data point should indicate SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maize dry matter accumulation under different N application rates (N1 to N4) and fertilizer types (U, S, SU) in 2019 and 2020. (<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>) Maize dry matter accumulation for each N application rate and year. Maize dry matter accumulation at the seedling stage is shown in <a href="#app1-agronomy-15-00011" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials</a>. CK = no N application; U = urea; S = slow-release N fertilizer; SU = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7. Different letters indicate significance at the 5% level for the same year by the LSD test. Error bars are ±1 standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). The Y-bars on each data point should indicate SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Plant N accumulation of maize at the maturity stage under different N application rates (N1 to N4) and fertilizer types (U, S, SU) in 2019 and 2020. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Plant N accumulation for each year. CK = no N application; U = urea; S = slow-release N fertilizer; SU = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7. Different letters indicate significance at the 5% level for the same year by the LSD test. Error bars are ±1 standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). The Y-bars on each data point should indicate SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Grain yield and NUE of maize under different N application rates (N1 to N4) and fertilizer types (U, S, SU) in 2019 and 2020. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Grain yield for each year. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) NUE for each year. CK = no N application; U = urea; S = slow-release N fertilizer; SU = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7. Different letters indicate significance at the 5% level for the same year by the LSD test. Error bars are ±1 standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Both X- and Y-bars on each data point should indicate SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationships between N application rate (N1 to N4) and blending ratio of SU (0–1, 0 = urea, 1 = slow-release N fertilizer, 0.7 = urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer at a ratio of 3:7) with grain yield and NUE of maize in 2019 and 2020 (MATLAB software and RStudio software). (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Grain yield for each year. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) NUE for each year.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 9214 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Agricultural Measures to Safeguard the Vulnerable Karst Groundwater Habitat of the Black Olm (Proteus anguinus parkelj) from Nitrate Pollution
by Matjaž Glavan and Rozalija Cvejić
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 11309; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411309 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 723
Abstract
The black olm (Proteus anguinus parkelj Sket & Arntzen) is an endemic species found exclusively in the Dobličica River subterranean water systems of the Dinaric karst in southern Slovenia. These unique habitats are vulnerable to contamination due to rapid water flow, primarily [...] Read more.
The black olm (Proteus anguinus parkelj Sket & Arntzen) is an endemic species found exclusively in the Dobličica River subterranean water systems of the Dinaric karst in southern Slovenia. These unique habitats are vulnerable to contamination due to rapid water flow, primarily from nitrates from agricultural fertilisers and untreated urban wastewater. The safe limit of nitrate concentration for olms is 9.2 mg NO3/L, yet measurements in karst springs have shown levels ranging from 3 mg to over 20 mg NO3/L. The SWAT modelling tool assessed agri-environmental and land use scenarios for their impact on nitrate leaching. Using the model, we identified hotspots with high nitrogen leaching potential that require immediate attention and implementation of better agricultural practices for fertiliser use. For these hotspots, the most effective approach combines scenarios of cover crops (R2), reduced fertilisation (R3), crop rotation (R4), and conversion of cropland to grassland (E2, E4, E5), potentially decreasing nitrate leaching by up to 60%. Implementing the best scenarios is expected to reduce nitrogen levels below the limit value of 9.2 mg NO3/L, essential for maintaining the black olm habitat. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Human Impact on Groundwater Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic characteristics of study area presenting (<b>a</b>) topography, river network, SWAT model subbasin numbers (1–22), main river gauging point and karst springs outflow points, (<b>b</b>) slope and karst springs (with SWAT model subbasin id number), (<b>c</b>) land use, and (<b>d</b>) soil type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Display of measured and simulated flow data at the Gradac gauging station for the period of (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) calibration (1998–2010) and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) validation (2011–2022) on a daily time step.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of observed and simulated data on (<b>a</b>) the nitrate nitrogen yield (kg N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>/day) and water flow at the Gradac measuring station (subbasin 22) and (<b>b</b>) the nitrate nitrogen concentration (mg N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>/day) and water flow at the Jelševnik karst spring (subbasin 9) on a daily time step.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the basic scenario with alternative scenarios of (<b>a</b>) agricultural crop rotation change (R) and (<b>b</b>) agricultural land use change (E) in relation to the average nitrate nitrogen transported (kg N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>/ha per year) from HRUs in the groundwater flow to the surface water flow in the study area of 11 subbasins.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3153 KiB  
Article
Influence of Biochar Feedstocks on Nitrate Adsorption Capacity
by Riad Eissa, Lordwin Jeyakumar, David B. McKenzie and Jianghua Wu
Earth 2024, 5(4), 1080-1096; https://doi.org/10.3390/earth5040055 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 728
Abstract
The demand for intensive agriculture to boost food and crop production has increased. High nitrogen (N) fertilizer use is crucial for increasing agricultural productivity but often leads to significant nitrate losses, posing risks to surface and groundwater quality. This study examines the role [...] Read more.
The demand for intensive agriculture to boost food and crop production has increased. High nitrogen (N) fertilizer use is crucial for increasing agricultural productivity but often leads to significant nitrate losses, posing risks to surface and groundwater quality. This study examines the role of biochar as a soil amendment to enhance nutrient retention and mitigate nitrate leaching. By improving nitrogen efficiency, biochar offers a sustainable strategy to reduce the environmental impacts of intensive agriculture while maintaining soil fertility. An incubation study investigated four biochar feedstocks: spruce bark biochar at 550 °C (SB550), hardwood biochar (75% sugar maple) at 500 °C (HW500), sawdust (fir/spruce) biochar at 427 °C (FS427), and softwood biochar at 500 °C (SW500), to identify the most effective nitrate adsorbent. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) were employed to analyze biochar morphology and surface functional groups. Adsorption isotherms were modeled using the Langmuir and Freundlich equations. The results indicated that surface functional groups, such as aromatic C=C stretching and bending, aromatic C–H bending, and phenolic O–H bending, play crucial roles in enhancing electrostatic attraction and, consequently, the nitrate adsorption capacity of biochar. The equilibrium adsorption data from this study fit well with both the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Among the four biochar types tested, SB550 exhibited the highest nitrate adsorption capacity, with a maximum of 184 mg/g. The adsorption data showed excellent conformity to the Langmuir and Freundlich models, with correlation coefficients (R2) exceeding 0.987 for all biochar types. These findings highlight the high accuracy of these models in predicting nitrate adsorption capacities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>SEM images of the biochars, including (<b>a</b>) SB550, (<b>b</b>) HW500, (<b>c</b>) FS427, and (<b>d</b>) SW500.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>FT-IR spectra of biochars before and after nitrate adsorption highlight key functional groups, such as aromatic C=C stretching and phenolic O–H bending, which contribute to nitrate adsorption efficiency. The spectra include the following biochars: (<b>a</b>) SB550, (<b>b</b>) HW500, (<b>c</b>) FS427, and (<b>d</b>) SW500.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms models for nitrate adsorption onto biochar, including (<b>a</b>) SB550, (<b>b</b>) HW500, (<b>c</b>) S427, and (<b>d</b>) SW500.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nitrate removal rates from aqueous solutions by different biochar types, including (<b>a</b>) SB550, (<b>b</b>) HW500, (<b>c</b>) FS427, and (<b>d</b>) SW500.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of initial nitrate concentration on nitrate adsorption (mg/g) and nitrate removal rate (%) by biochar (<b>a</b>) SB550, (<b>b</b>) HW500, (<b>c</b>) FS427, and (<b>d</b>) SW500.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of initial solution pH and the equilibrium solution pH on nitrate removal rate, (<b>a</b>) SB550, (<b>b</b>) HW500, (<b>c</b>) FS427, and (<b>d</b>) SW500.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 7277 KiB  
Article
Field-Level Classification of Winter Catch Crops Using Sentinel-2 Time Series: Model Comparison and Transferability
by Kato Vanpoucke, Stien Heremans, Emily Buls and Ben Somers
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4620; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244620 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1191
Abstract
Winter catch crops are promoted in the European Union under the Common Agricultural Policy to improve soil health and reduce nitrate leaching from agricultural fields. Currently, Member States often monitor farmers’ adoption through on-site inspections for a limited subset of parcels. Because of [...] Read more.
Winter catch crops are promoted in the European Union under the Common Agricultural Policy to improve soil health and reduce nitrate leaching from agricultural fields. Currently, Member States often monitor farmers’ adoption through on-site inspections for a limited subset of parcels. Because of its potential for region-wide coverage, this study investigates the potential of Sentinel-2 satellite time series to classify catch crops at the field level in Flanders (Belgium). The first objective was to classify catch crops and identify the optimal model and time-series input for this task. The second objective was to apply these findings in a real-world scenario, aiming to provide reliable early-season predictions in a separate target year, testing early-season performance and temporal transferability. The following three models were compared: Random Forest (RF), Time Series Forest (TSF), and a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN). The results showed that, with a limited field-based training dataset, RF produced the most robust results across different time-series inputs, achieving a median F1-score of >88% on the best dataset. Additionally, the early-season performance of the models was delayed in the target year, reaching the F1-score threshold of 85% at least one month later in the season compared to the training years, with large timing differences between the models. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Highlights of the applied workflow. Three experiments were conducted: The first and second experiments aimed to study the influence of temporal resolution and input features on the classification, respectively on the classification. The third experiment evaluated the models’ performance early in the winter season and their temporal transferability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The location of the study region in Europe; Flanders is colored in cyan. Administrative borders: European Environment Agency (<a href="http://www.eea.europa.eu/datahub" target="_blank">www.eea.europa.eu/datahub</a> (accessed on 22 November 2024)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Locations of the 6881 field observations in the study area: (<b>A</b>) colored by year of observation where the color indicates the year in which the winter year started (e.g., 2022 are observations in the winter year 2022–2023) and (<b>B</b>) the field observations located on an agricultural land use map. Land use: Department of Environment and Spatial Development (<a href="http://www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats" target="_blank">www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats</a> (accessed on 22 November 2024)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Overview of (<b>A</b>) the classification hierarchy and (<b>B</b>) the label distribution on both the first (left) and second level (right) of the hierarchy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Network architecture of the One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN). The convolutional blocks each comprise a convolutional layer (number of filters, 8, 16, 32), a batch normalization, and a Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function. The fully connected blocks each consist of a linear layer, a batch normalization, and ReLU activation function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average NDVI time series at (<b>A</b>) daily, (<b>B</b>) dekadal, and (<b>C</b>) monthly temporal resolution for each of the classes. Linear interpolation was used to create continuous time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Violin plots for the F1-scores of the first experiment given for three temporal resolutions and three different models (Random Forest or RF, Time Series Forest or TSF, and a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network or 1D-CNN). Within the violin plots, the boxplots are depicted in black.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Violin plots for the F1-scores of the second experiment given for three temporal resolutions and three different models (Random Forest or RF, Time Series Forest or TSF, and One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network or 1D-CNN). (<b>A</b>) Part A of the second experiment and (<b>B</b>) part B of the second experiment. Within the violin plots, boxplots are depicted in black.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Confusion matrices for the fine-label, end-of-season classification for three different models: (<b>A</b>) Random Forest (RF), (<b>B</b>) Time Series Forest (TSF), and (<b>C</b>) One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN). The blue frames indicate the coarse-label classification groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>F1-scores for the third experiment, which was completed on daily time series with features NDVI-fAPAR-FCover for three models (RF, TSF, and 1D-CNN). (<b>A</b>) Results when trained and tested on the same years; (<b>B</b>) results when the models are applied on a target year. Month on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis shows the end point of the time series: e.g., Dec represents a time series starting in August and ending in December. Shadowing indicates the standard deviation on the results from the diferent model runs. Note that the results for RF and TSF largely overlap in panel (<b>A</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Maps to illustrate the results of the Random Forest (RF) model on time series until April. Binary (<b>A</b>) ground truth and (<b>B</b>) classification results, fine-label (<b>C</b>) ground truth and (<b>D</b>) classification results. (<b>E</b>) Location of maps (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) in the study area. Land use: Department of Environment and Spatial Development (<a href="http://www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats" target="_blank">www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats</a> (accessed on 22 November 2024)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Maps to illustrate the results of the Random Forest (RF) model on time series until April. Binary (<b>A</b>) ground truth and (<b>B</b>) classification results, fine-label (<b>C</b>) ground truth and (<b>D</b>) classification results. (<b>E</b>) Location of maps (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) in the study area. Land use: Department of Environment and Spatial Development (<a href="http://www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats" target="_blank">www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats</a> (accessed on 22 November 2024)).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Comparison of the temporal profiles (NDVI, 1-day interval) of the different classification groups between the training data (2016–2021) and the validation data (2022). Shadowing indicates the standard deviation on each averaged profile. The group ‘Legumes’ is not visualized because of its absence in the validation dataset (2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>Comparison of the temporal profiles (NDVI, 1-day interval) of the different classification groups between the training data (2016–2021) and the validation data (2022). Shadowing indicates the standard deviation on each averaged profile. The group ‘Legumes’ is not visualized because of its absence in the validation dataset (2022).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop