[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (158)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = minimax

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 411 KiB  
Article
Formal Verification of Multi-Thread Minimax Behavior Using mCRL2 in the Connect 4
by Diego Escobar and Jesus Insuasti
Mathematics 2025, 13(1), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13010096 - 29 Dec 2024
Viewed by 916
Abstract
This study focuses on the formal verification of a parallel version of the minimax algorithm using the mCRL2 modeling language, applied to the game of Connect 4. The research aims to ensure that the algorithm behaves correctly in concurrent execution environments by providing [...] Read more.
This study focuses on the formal verification of a parallel version of the minimax algorithm using the mCRL2 modeling language, applied to the game of Connect 4. The research aims to ensure that the algorithm behaves correctly in concurrent execution environments by providing a formal model and conducting rigorous verification. The parallel version of minimax distributes computations across multiple threads, with each thread evaluating different successor states concurrently. Using mCRL2, we specify the algorithm’s behavior, generate Labeled Transition Systems (LTSs), and verify critical properties such as the absence of deadlocks, liveness, and correctness of state transitions. The formal verification process demonstrates that the proposed model accurately represents the parallel minimax algorithm and ensures its reliability by verifying properties that guarantee unique and non-redundant actions throughout the execution. The findings highlight the value of formal methods in validating the correctness of parallel artificial intelligence algorithms, laying the foundation for future optimizations that focus on performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics and Computer Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scheme for the multi-threaded implementation of the minimax algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Partial LTS of the minimax behavior. The green dot represents the initial state of the LTS.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 479 KiB  
Article
The Capped Separable Difference of Two Norms for Signal Recovery
by Zhiyong Zhou and Gui Wang
Mathematics 2024, 12(23), 3717; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12233717 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 346
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel capped separable difference of two norms (CSDTN) method for sparse signal recovery, which generalizes the well-known minimax concave penalty (MCP) method. The CSDTN method incorporates two shape parameters and one scale parameter, with their appropriate selection being crucial [...] Read more.
This paper introduces a novel capped separable difference of two norms (CSDTN) method for sparse signal recovery, which generalizes the well-known minimax concave penalty (MCP) method. The CSDTN method incorporates two shape parameters and one scale parameter, with their appropriate selection being crucial for ensuring robustness and achieving superior reconstruction performance. We provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the method and propose an efficient iteratively reweighted 1 (IRL1)-based algorithm for solving the corresponding optimization problem. Extensive numerical experiments, including electrocardiogram (ECG) and synthetic signal recovery tasks, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed CSDTN method. Our method outperforms existing methods in terms of recovery accuracy and robustness. These results highlight the potential of CSDTN in various signal-processing applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The plots for the regularization functions of CSDTN method with the scale parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, respectively. We set <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>[</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>{</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>}</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>{</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>}</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>. All the functions are scaled to attain the point <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a better comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of reconstruction performance for ECG signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A comparison of reconstruction performance for Gaussian random matrix and oversampled DCT random matrices with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>{</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>10</mn> <mo>}</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the noiseless case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>MSE of sparse recovery from noisy Gaussian random measurements.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 382 KiB  
Article
MODE: Minimax Optimal Deterministic Experiments for Causal Inference in the Presence of Covariates
by Shaohua Xu, Songnan Liu and Yongdao Zhou
Entropy 2024, 26(12), 1023; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26121023 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 417
Abstract
Data-driven decision-making has become crucial across various domains. Randomization and re-randomization are standard techniques employed in controlled experiments to estimate causal effects in the presence of numerous pre-treatment covariates. This paper quantifies the worst-case mean squared error of the difference-in-means estimator as a [...] Read more.
Data-driven decision-making has become crucial across various domains. Randomization and re-randomization are standard techniques employed in controlled experiments to estimate causal effects in the presence of numerous pre-treatment covariates. This paper quantifies the worst-case mean squared error of the difference-in-means estimator as a generalized discrepancy of covariates between treatment and control groups. We demonstrate that existing randomized or re-randomized experiments utilizing Monte Carlo methods are sub-optimal in minimizing this generalized discrepancy. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel optimal deterministic experiment based on quasi-Monte Carlo techniques, which effectively minimizes the generalized discrepancy in a model-independent manner. We provide a theoretical proof indicating that the difference-in-means estimator derived from the proposed experiment converges more rapidly than those obtained from completely randomized or re-randomized experiments using Mahalanobis distance. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed experiment significantly reduces covariate imbalances and estimation uncertainties when compared to existing randomized and deterministic approaches. In summary, the proposed experiment serves as a reliable and effective framework for controlled experimentation in causal inference. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Information Theory, Probability and Statistics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Covariates of the treatment group and the control group under the CRE (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and the MODE (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Covariate imbalances, measured based on the Mahalanobis distance and the energy distance, of various experiments under different values of <span class="html-italic">n</span> and <span class="html-italic">p</span>.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 397 KiB  
Article
Two New Families of Local Asymptotically Minimax Lower Bounds in Parameter Estimation
by Neri Merhav
Entropy 2024, 26(11), 944; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26110944 - 4 Nov 2024
Viewed by 550
Abstract
We propose two families of asymptotically local minimax lower bounds on parameter estimation performance. The first family of bounds applies to any convex, symmetric loss function that depends solely on the difference between the estimate and the true underlying parameter value (i.e., the [...] Read more.
We propose two families of asymptotically local minimax lower bounds on parameter estimation performance. The first family of bounds applies to any convex, symmetric loss function that depends solely on the difference between the estimate and the true underlying parameter value (i.e., the estimation error), whereas the second is more specifically oriented to the moments of the estimation error. The proposed bounds are relatively easy to calculate numerically (in the sense that their optimization is over relatively few auxiliary parameters), yet they turn out to be tighter (sometimes significantly so) than previously reported bounds that are associated with similar calculation efforts, across many application examples. In addition to their relative simplicity, they also have the following advantages: (i) Essentially no regularity conditions are required regarding the parametric family of distributions. (ii) The bounds are local (in a sense to be specified). (iii) The bounds provide the correct order of decay as functions of the number of observations, at least in all the examples examined. (iv) At least the first family of bounds extends straightforwardly to vector parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Information Theory)
31 pages, 1878 KiB  
Article
An Integrated SIMUS–Game Theory Approach for Sustainable Decision Making—An Application for Route and Transport Operator Selection
by Svetla Stoilova
Sustainability 2024, 16(21), 9199; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219199 - 23 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 877
Abstract
The choice of management strategy for companies operating in different sectors of the economy is of great importance for their sustainable development. In many cases, companies are in competition within the scope of the same activities, meaning that the profit of one company [...] Read more.
The choice of management strategy for companies operating in different sectors of the economy is of great importance for their sustainable development. In many cases, companies are in competition within the scope of the same activities, meaning that the profit of one company is at the expense of the other. The choice of strategies for each of the firms in this case can be optimized using game theory for a non-cooperative game case where the two players have antagonistic interests. The aim of this research is to develop a methodology which, in non-cooperative games, accounts for the benefits of different criteria for each of the strategies of the two participants. In this research a new integrated sequential interactive model for urban systems (SIMUS)–game theory technique for decision making in the case of non-cooperative games is proposed. The methodology includes three steps. The first step consists of a determination of the strategies of both players and the selection of criteria for their assessment. In the second step the SIMUS method for multi-criteria analysis is applied to identify the benefits of the strategies for both players according to the criteria. The model formation in game theory is drawn up in the third step. The payoff matrix of the game is formed based on the benefits obtained from the SIMUS method. The strategies of both players are solved by dual linear programming. Finally, to verify the results of the new approach we apply four criteria to make a decision—Laplace’s criterion, the minimax and maximin criteria, Savage’s criterion and Hurwitz’s criterion. The new integrated SIMUS–game theory approach is applied to a real example in the transport sector. The Bulgarian transport network is investigated regarding route and transport type selection for a carriage of containers between a starting point, Sofia, and a destination, Varna, in the case of competition between railway and road operators. Two strategies for a railway operator and three strategies for a road operator are examined. The benefits of the strategies for both operators are determined using the SIMUS method, based on seven criteria representing environmental, technological, infrastructural, economic, security and safety factors. The optimal strategies for both operators are determined using the game model and dual linear programming. It is discovered that the railway operator will apply their first strategy and that the road operator will also apply their first strategy. Both players will obtain a profit if they implement their optimal strategies. The new integrated SIMUS–game theory approach can be used in different areas of research, when the strategies for both players in non-cooperatives games need to be established. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Transport Research and Railway Network Performance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scheme of the methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scheme of the strategies for the railway and road operator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Criteria for verification. Player A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Criteria for verification. Player B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Weights of criteria determined using the SIMUS method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the results using the SIMUS method, SIMUS–game theory and game theory by costs.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 397 KiB  
Article
Concentrating Solutions for Fractional Schrödinger–Poisson Systems with Critical Growth
by Liejun Shen and Marco Squassina
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(10), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8100581 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 608
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a class of fractional Schrödinger–Poisson systems (Δ)su+λV(x)u+ϕu=f(u)+|u|2s*2u and [...] Read more.
In this paper, we consider a class of fractional Schrödinger–Poisson systems (Δ)su+λV(x)u+ϕu=f(u)+|u|2s*2u and (Δ)tϕ=u2 in R3, where s,t(0,1) with 2s+2t>3, λ>0 denotes a parameter, V:R3R admits a potential well ΩintV1(0) and 2s*632s is the fractional Sobolev critical exponent. Given some reasonable assumptions as to the potential V and the nonlinearity f, with the help of a constrained manifold argument, we conclude the existence of positive ground state solutions for some sufficiently large λ. Upon relaxing the restrictions on V and f, we utilize the minimax technique to show that the system has a positive mountain-pass type by introducing some analytic tricks. Moreover, we investigate the asymptotical behavior of the obtained solutions when λ+. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonlinear Equations Driven by Fractional Laplacian Operators)
22 pages, 1992 KiB  
Article
The Forecasting of the Spread of Infectious Diseases Based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks
by Olga Krivorotko and Nikolay Zyatkov
Mathematics 2024, 12(19), 3044; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12193044 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 665
Abstract
New epidemics encourage the development of new mathematical models of the spread and forecasting of infectious diseases. Statistical epidemiology data are characterized by incomplete and inexact time series, which leads to an unstable and non-unique forecasting of infectious diseases. In this paper, a [...] Read more.
New epidemics encourage the development of new mathematical models of the spread and forecasting of infectious diseases. Statistical epidemiology data are characterized by incomplete and inexact time series, which leads to an unstable and non-unique forecasting of infectious diseases. In this paper, a model of a conditional generative adversarial neural network (CGAN) for modeling and forecasting COVID-19 in St. Petersburg is constructed. It takes 20 processed historical statistics as a condition and is based on the solution of the minimax problem. The CGAN builds a short-term forecast of the number of newly diagnosed COVID-19 cases in the region for 5 days ahead. The CGAN approach allows modeling the distribution of statistical data, which allows obtaining the required amount of training data from the resulting distribution. When comparing the forecasting results with the classical differential SEIR-HCD model and a recurrent neural network with the same input parameters, it was shown that the forecast errors of all three models are in the same range. It is shown that the prediction error of the bagging model based on three models is lower than the results of each model separately. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Mathematics in Disease Control and Dynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The architecture of a CGAN for a time series. Here, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>k</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>z</mi> <mo>|</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daily number of newly diagnosed COVID-19 cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Current number of hospitalized people as a result of COVID-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Current number of COVID-19 patients requiring a ventilator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Daily number of deaths due to COVID-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Daily number of people tested for COVID-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily number of newly diagnosed COVID-19 cases around the world.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Percentage of the population with late IgG antibodies to COVID-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Population self-isolation index from Yandex in St. Petersburg.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Daily number of deaths due to COVID-19 in St. Petersburg (after processing) from 2020 to 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Number of daily diagnosed COVID-19 cases normalized by number people tested in St. Petersburg.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Number of processed daily deaths due to COVID-19 in St. Petersburg using the ADF test. The detailed description of the middle and right charts are given in text above.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Number of processed daily deaths due to COVID-19 in St. Petersburg (7-day logarithmic transformation) using the ADF test. The detailed description of the middle and right charts are given in text above <a href="#mathematics-12-03044-f012" class="html-fig">Figure 12</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Target time series <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>K</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for the forecasting of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg 1-5 days in advance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Scheme for preparing data for training and testing a machine learning model using the sliding time window method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>New daily diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg indicating the strains of COVID-19 and their appearance in the region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Architecture of generator (<b>a</b>) and discriminator (<b>b</b>) neural networks in the CGAN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Training loss curve of the generator (<b>a</b>), discriminator (<b>b</b>), and total losses during training of the generator and discriminator (<b>c</b>) in the CGAN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>True forecasts of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg (black dotted curves) and a once-generated forecast by the generator (red solid line) for day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) based on the training data from October 2020 to July 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>True forecasts of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg (black dotted curves) and a once-generated forecast by the generator (red solid line) for day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) based on the test data from July 2022 to January 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Results of the forecast of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>K</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the following <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) days for the COVID-19 outbreak from July 2022 to November 2022. First column: black dashed line—the real number of diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>); light red area—95% CI of the forecast on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>), generated by the generator; the red line is the average of 10,000 generated forecasts. Second column: the red line is the dependence of the true forecasts on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) on themselves; blue dots—the dependence of the generator forecasts on the true forecasts. Third column: histograms of absolute generator forecast errors versus true forecasts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Results of the forecast of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>K</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the next <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) days for the COVID-19 outbreak from October 2023 to January 2024. First column: black dashed line—the real number of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>); light red area—95% CI of the forecast on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>), generated by the generator; the red line is the average of 10,000 generated forecasts. Second column: the red line is the dependence of true forecasts on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) on themselves; blue dots—the dependence of the generator forecasts on the true forecasts. The third column describes histograms of absolute generator forecast errors versus true forecasts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Results of the forecast of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in the Novosibirsk region <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>K</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the next <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) days for the COVID-19 outbreak from July 2022 to November 2022. First column: black dashed line—the real number of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in the Novosibirsk region on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>); light red area—95% CI of the forecast on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), generated by the generator; the red line is the average of 10,000 generated forecasts. Second column: the red line is the dependence of the true forecasts on day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) on themselves; blue dots—the dependence of the generator forecasts on the true forecasts. The third column describes histograms of absolute generator forecast errors versus true forecasts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>True forecasts of newly diagnosed cases of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg (black dots), base forecast obtained using the SEIR-HCD model (red curve), recurrent neural network (purple curve), and the average from 10,000 generated forecasts obtained using the CGAN (blue curve) for day <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) based on the test data from July 2022 to January 2024.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2801 KiB  
Article
Maneuvering Object Tracking and Movement Parameters Identification by Indirect Observations with Random Delays
by Alexey Bosov
Axioms 2024, 13(10), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13100668 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 519
Abstract
The paper presents an approach to solving the problem of unknown motion parameters Bayesian identification for the stochastic dynamic system model with randomly delayed observations. The system identification and the object tracking tasks obtain solutions in the form of recurrent Bayesian relations for [...] Read more.
The paper presents an approach to solving the problem of unknown motion parameters Bayesian identification for the stochastic dynamic system model with randomly delayed observations. The system identification and the object tracking tasks obtain solutions in the form of recurrent Bayesian relations for a posteriori probability density. These relations are not practically applicable due to the computational challenges they present. For practical implementation, we propose a conditionally minimax nonlinear filter that implements the concept of conditionally optimal estimation. The random delays model source is the area of autonomous underwater vehicle control. The paper discusses in detail a computational experiment based on a model that is closely aligned with this practical need. The discussion includes both a description of the filter synthesis features based on the geometric interpretation of the simulated measurements and an impact analysis of the effectiveness of model special factors, such as time delays and model unknown parameters. Furthermore, the paper puts forth a novel approach to the identification problem statement, positing a random jumping change in the motion parameters values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stochastic Modeling and Analysis for Applications and Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Examples of AUV’s trajectories. 1—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 2—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>above</b>) is model (3), and (<b>below</b>) is model (1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Examples of velocity trajectories. 1—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mi>x</mi> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 2—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mi>y</mi> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 3—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>v</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>x</mi> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 4—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>v</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>y</mi> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>above</b>) is model (3), and (<b>below</b>) is model (1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of delay trajectories. 1—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msub> <mi>τ</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 2—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msub> <mi>τ</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Filtering accuracy. 1—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msubsup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>K</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>t</mi> <mi>x</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 2—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msubsup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>K</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>t</mi> <mi>x</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msqrt> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 3—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mover accent="true"> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 4—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mover accent="true"> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, on the (<b>left</b>) is model (3), on the (<b>right</b>) is model (1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Identification accuracy. 1—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msubsup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>K</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>t</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 2—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msubsup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>K</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>t</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>4</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msqrt> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 3—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>v</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>x</mi> </msub> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 4—<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>v</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>y</mi> </msub> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, on the (<b>left</b>) is model (3), and on the (<b>right</b>) is model (1).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1026 KiB  
Article
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Concurrent Letrozole for Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Nonrandomized Phase II Study (NeoCHAI)
by Heejung Chae, Sung Hoon Sim, Youngmi Kwon, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jai Hong Han, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Yeon-Joo Kim, Tae Hyun Kim and Keun Seok Lee
Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3122; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183122 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1044
Abstract
The role of combining neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with conventional chemotherapy remains unclear; therefore, we conducted an open-label, single-center, nonrandomized phase II trial to assess the effect of this combination. Patients with previously untreated stage II or III HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer received concurrent [...] Read more.
The role of combining neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with conventional chemotherapy remains unclear; therefore, we conducted an open-label, single-center, nonrandomized phase II trial to assess the effect of this combination. Patients with previously untreated stage II or III HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer received concurrent letrozole 2.5 mg with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery. We used Simon’s minimax two-stage design; a pCR rate > 6% was necessary at the first stage to continue. Between November 2017 and November 2020, 53 women were enrolled in the first stage of the trial. Their median age was 49 years (range, 33–63), and 60% of them were premenopausal. Subsequently, 66% and 34% of patients with clinical stages II and III, respectively, were included; 93% had clinically node-positive disease. Two patients (4%) achieved pCR after neoadjuvant chemo–endocrine treatment, which did not satisfy the criteria for continuing to the second stage. The overall response rate was 83%. During the median follow-up of 53.7 months, the 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 87% and 98%, respectively. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 adverse event (40%), but rarely led to febrile neutropenic episodes (4%). Myalgia (32%), nausea (19%), constipation (17%), heartburn (11%), oral mucositis (9%), and sensory neuropathy (9%) were frequently observed, but classified as grade 1 or 2. No deaths occurred during preoperative treatment. The addition of letrozole to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy was safe and beneficial in terms of overall response rate, but did not provide a higher pCR rate in locally advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Further research is needed to enhance neoadjuvant treatment strategies for this cancer subtype. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study design. Treatment schema (<b>a</b>) and Simon’s minimax two-stage design (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Survival outcomes for all patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) (<b>a</b>), distant disease-free survival (<b>b</b>), and overall survival (OS) (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 289 KiB  
Article
A Minimax-Program-Based Approach for Robust Fractional Multi-Objective Optimization
by Henan Li, Zhe Hong and Do Sang Kim
Mathematics 2024, 12(16), 2475; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162475 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 591
Abstract
In this paper, by making use of some advanced tools from variational analysis and generalized differentiation, we establish necessary optimality conditions for a class of robust fractional minimax programming problems. Sufficient optimality conditions for the considered problem are also obtained by means of [...] Read more.
In this paper, by making use of some advanced tools from variational analysis and generalized differentiation, we establish necessary optimality conditions for a class of robust fractional minimax programming problems. Sufficient optimality conditions for the considered problem are also obtained by means of generalized convex functions. Additionally, we formulate a dual problem to the primal one and examine duality relations between them. In our results, by using the obtained results, we obtain necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a class of robust fractional multi-objective optimization problems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Functional Analysis and Applications: 2nd Edition)
17 pages, 1696 KiB  
Article
A Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process with Constraints and Dynamic Environments
by Guanzhi Liu, Xinfu Pang and Jishen Wan
Mathematics 2024, 12(14), 2285; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12142285 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 737
Abstract
The optimization problems in a fluid catalytic cracking process with dynamic constraints and conflicting objectives are challenging due to the complicated constraints and dynamic environments. The decision variables need to be reoptimized to obtain the best objectives when dynamic environments arise. To solve [...] Read more.
The optimization problems in a fluid catalytic cracking process with dynamic constraints and conflicting objectives are challenging due to the complicated constraints and dynamic environments. The decision variables need to be reoptimized to obtain the best objectives when dynamic environments arise. To solve these problems, we established a mathematical model and proposed a dynamic constrained multiobjective optimization evolution algorithm for the fluid catalytic cracking process. In this algorithm, we design an offspring generation strategy based on minimax solutions, which can explore more feasible regions and converge quickly. Additionally, a dynamic response strategy based on population feasibility is proposed to improve the feasible and infeasible solutions by different perturbations, respectively. To verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, we test the algorithm on ten instances based on the hypervolume metric. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is highly competitive with several state-of-the-art competitors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Fuzzy Sets, Systems and Decision Making)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The production process of the FCC unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of PS feasible domain variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Evolution curves of HV values for the first DCMOP of the FCC process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evolution curves of HV values for the second DCMOP of the FCC process.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 773 KiB  
Article
Data-Driven Method for Robust Recovery in 1-Bit Compressive Sensing with the Minimax Concave Penalty
by Cui Jia and Li Zhu
Mathematics 2024, 12(14), 2168; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12142168 - 10 Jul 2024
Viewed by 801
Abstract
With the advent of large-scale data, the demand for information is increasing, which makes signal sampling technology and digital processing methods particularly important. The utilization of 1-bit compressive sensing in sparse recovery has garnered significant attention due to its cost-effectiveness in hardware implementation [...] Read more.
With the advent of large-scale data, the demand for information is increasing, which makes signal sampling technology and digital processing methods particularly important. The utilization of 1-bit compressive sensing in sparse recovery has garnered significant attention due to its cost-effectiveness in hardware implementation and storage. In this paper, we first leverage the minimax concave penalty equipped with the least squares to recover a high-dimensional true signal xRp with k-sparse from n-dimensional 1-bit measurements and discuss the regularization by combing the nonconvex sparsity-inducing penalties. Moreover, we give an analysis of the complexity of the method with minimax concave penalty in certain conditions and derive the general theory for the model equipped with the family of sparsity-inducing nonconvex functions. Then, our approach employs a data-driven Newton-type method with stagewise steps to solve the proposed method. Numerical experiments on the synthesized and real data verify the competitiveness of the proposed method. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The robustness of MCPWP for various <span class="html-italic">k</span>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ϵ</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>η</mi> </semantics></math> under <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>20</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>η</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 0:0.03:0.15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The SNR for different methods with different sparsities. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2:2:6, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The exact probability and CPU time for different methods with different sparsities. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2:2:6, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The SNR for different methods with different sparsities. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The exact probability and CPU time for different methods with different sparsities. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>:</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The SNR for different methods with different sparsities. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>η</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 0.05:0.05:0.15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The exact probability and CPU time for different methods on the different sparsity. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi>η</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 0.05:0.05:0.15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of different methods under 1-D real signal. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>8000</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2500</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.04</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 5347 KiB  
Communication
Efficient Aperture Fill Time Correction for Wideband Sparse Array Using Improved Variable Fractional Delay Filters
by Jie Gu, Min Xu, Wenjing Zhou and Mingwei Shen
Sensors 2024, 24(13), 4327; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134327 - 3 Jul 2024
Viewed by 772
Abstract
To solve the problem of aperture fill time (AFT) for wideband sparse arrays, variable fractional delay (VFD) FIR filters are applied to eliminate linear coupling between spatial and time domains. However, the large dimensions of the filter coefficient matrix result in high system [...] Read more.
To solve the problem of aperture fill time (AFT) for wideband sparse arrays, variable fractional delay (VFD) FIR filters are applied to eliminate linear coupling between spatial and time domains. However, the large dimensions of the filter coefficient matrix result in high system complexity. To alleviate the computational burden of solving VFD filter coefficients, a novel multi–regultion minimax (MRMM) model utilizing the sparse representation technique has been presented. The error function is constrained by the introduction of L2–norm and L1–norm regularizations within the minimax criterion. The L2–norm effectively resolves the problems of overfitting and non–unique solutions that arise in the sparse optimization of traditional minimax (MM) models. Meanwhile, the use of multiple L1–norms enables the optimal design of the smallest sub–filter number and order of the VFD filter. To solve the established nonconvex model, an improved sequential–alternating direction method of multipliers (S–ADMM) algorithm for filter coefficients is proposed, which utilizes sequential alternation to iteratively update multiple soft–thresholding problems. The experimental results show that the optimized VFD filter reduces system complexity significantly and corrects AFT effectively in a wideband sparse array. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Farrow structure the VFD FIR filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Aperture crossing correction of wideband sparse array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Convergence of the S−ADMM algorithm: (<b>a</b>) shows the convergence of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced close="&#x2016;" open="&#x2016;"> <mi>r</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced close="&#x2016;" open="&#x2016;"> <mi>s</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; and (<b>b</b>) shows the convergence of the cost function given by Equation (16).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Amplitude–frequency response error plots for different algorithms. (<b>a</b>) is the MM algorithm; (<b>b</b>) is the S–WLS algorithm; and (<b>c</b>) is the MRMM algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Amplitude–frequency response error plots for different algorithms. (<b>a</b>) is the MM algorithm; (<b>b</b>) is the S–WLS algorithm; and (<b>c</b>) is the MRMM algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Amplitude–frequency response plots of different algorithms. (<b>a</b>) is the MM algorithm; (<b>b</b>) is the S–WLS algorithm; and (<b>c</b>) is the MRMM algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Phase–frequency plot for different algorithms at a fractional delay <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sparse array location distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Wideband sparse array antenna orientation diagram. (<b>a</b>) is the result of aperture crossing; and (<b>b</b>) is the result of aperture correction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Wideband sparse array antenna orientation diagram.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 223 KiB  
Article
Nash’s Existence Theorem for Non-Compact Strategy Sets
by Xinyu Zhang, Chunyan Yang, Renjie Han and Shiqing Zhang
Mathematics 2024, 12(13), 2017; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12132017 - 28 Jun 2024
Viewed by 615
Abstract
In this paper, we apply the classical FKKM lemma to obtain the Ky Fan minimax inequality defined on nonempty non-compact convex subsets in reflexive Banach spaces, and then we apply it to game theory and obtain Nash’s existence theorem for non-compact strategy sets, [...] Read more.
In this paper, we apply the classical FKKM lemma to obtain the Ky Fan minimax inequality defined on nonempty non-compact convex subsets in reflexive Banach spaces, and then we apply it to game theory and obtain Nash’s existence theorem for non-compact strategy sets, which can be regarded as a new, simple but interesting application of the FKKM lemma and the Ky Fan minimax inequality, and we can also present another proof about the famous John von Neumann’s existence theorem in two-player zero-sum games. Due to the results of Li, Shi and Chang, the coerciveness in the conclusion can be replaced with the P.S. or G.P.S. conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonlinear Functional Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications)
41 pages, 1269 KiB  
Article
Entry-Wise Eigenvector Analysis and Improved Rates for Topic Modeling on Short Documents
by Zheng Tracy Ke and Jingming Wang
Mathematics 2024, 12(11), 1682; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12111682 - 28 May 2024
Viewed by 4103
Abstract
Topic modeling is a widely utilized tool in text analysis. We investigate the optimal rate for estimating a topic model. Specifically, we consider a scenario with n documents, a vocabulary of size p, and document lengths at the order N. When [...] Read more.
Topic modeling is a widely utilized tool in text analysis. We investigate the optimal rate for estimating a topic model. Specifically, we consider a scenario with n documents, a vocabulary of size p, and document lengths at the order N. When Nc·p, referred to as the long-document case, the optimal rate is established in the literature at p/(Nn). However, when N=o(p), referred to as the short-document case, the optimal rate remains unknown. In this paper, we first provide new entry-wise large-deviation bounds for the empirical singular vectors of a topic model. We then apply these bounds to improve the error rate of a spectral algorithm, Topic-SCORE. Finally, by comparing the improved error rate with the minimax lower bound, we conclude that the optimal rate is still p/(Nn) in the short-document case. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theory and Applications of Random Matrix)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An illustration of Topic-SCORE in the noiseless case (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1039"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). The blue dots are <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1040"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (word embeddings constructed from the population singular vectors), and they are contained in a simplex with <italic>K</italic> vertices. This simplex can be recovered from a vertex hunting algorithm. Given this simplex, each <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1041"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> has a unique barycentric coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1042"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The topic matrix <italic>A</italic> is recovered from stacking together these <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1043"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>’s and utilizing <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1044"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1045"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop