[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (36)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = micro-pillar compression

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 7393 KiB  
Article
The Strength of Ti-6AL-4V Investigated Using Micro-Pillars
by Rayan B. M. Ameen, Dilveen W. Mohammed, Yu-Lung Chiu and Ian P. Jones
Micromachines 2025, 16(3), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16030293 (registering DOI) - 28 Feb 2025
Abstract
Focused Ion Beam (FIB) has been used to create single α-β colony micro-pillars from a polycrystalline commercial Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-64) sample. Each pillar was selected to have either a single alpha phase, a single beta phase, or two α lamella separated by a thin [...] Read more.
Focused Ion Beam (FIB) has been used to create single α-β colony micro-pillars from a polycrystalline commercial Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-64) sample. Each pillar was selected to have either a single alpha phase, a single beta phase, or two α lamella separated by a thin β phase filet. Then, utilizing a diamond flat tip as a compression platen, uniaxial micro-compression tests were performed on the single crystal α and β pillars as well as a tri-crystal α/β/α pillar using a nano-indenter. Then, utilizing a diamond flat tip as a compression platen, uniaxial micro-compression tests were performed on the single crystal alpha and beta pillars as well as a tri-crystal α/β/α pillar using a nano-indenter. Through the use of Electron Back Scattering Diffraction (EBSD) to choose the crystal orientation along the micro-pillar, three distinct unique slip systems have been selectively triggered by maximizing the Schmid factor for each system. The potential to localize a single crystal volume that can be characterized after deformation is one benefit of the micro-compression approach over traditional mechanical testing. The sample strengths compare well with published data. The mechanical properties of the α-β colonies and the single α and β phases have been compared in order to elucidate the role of the α/β interfaces in determining the critical resolved shear stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Micro- and Nano-Manufacturing Technologies, 2nd Edition)
16 pages, 12609 KiB  
Article
Microstructure and Micro-Mechanical Properties of Thermally Sprayed HA-TiO2 Coating on Beta-Titanium Substrate
by Abdulaziz Kurdi, Doaa Almalki, Ahmed Degnah and Animesh Kumar Basak
Materials 2025, 18(3), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030540 - 24 Jan 2025
Viewed by 279
Abstract
Metallic biomaterials in a solid form cause stress-shielding in orthopedic applications. Such implants also suffer from limited tissue attachment to become a part of the living system. In view of that, hydroxyapatite (HA) coating reinforced with titanium oxide (TiO2) was deposited [...] Read more.
Metallic biomaterials in a solid form cause stress-shielding in orthopedic applications. Such implants also suffer from limited tissue attachment to become a part of the living system. In view of that, hydroxyapatite (HA) coating reinforced with titanium oxide (TiO2) was deposited in a beta (β)-Titanium (Ti-35Nb-7Ta-5Zr) substrate by plasma spray. This allows us to exploit the best of the two materials, namely the relatively low modulus of β-Ti, together with the porous and bone-like structure/composition of the HA to facilitate cell growth. This is foreseen to be used as an implant, particularly for musculoskeletal-related disability. Detailed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation shows the lamellar structure of the coating that is composed of different phases and some porosities. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirms the co-existence of both the amorphous and crystalline phases that build up the coating structure. In situ micro-mechanical tests revealed that the HA-TiO2 coating was low in strength and modules compared to that of the substrate material, together with lower ductility. The yield stress and modulus of elasticity of the coating were about 877 ± 174 MPa and 447 ± 24 MPa, respectively. In contrast, the beta (β)-Ti substrate possesses about 990 ± 85 MPa of yield stress and 259 ± 19 MPa modulus of elasticity. The deformation mechanism was also quite different, where the coating crumbled under compressive loading, featuring limited ductility with cleavage (brittle)-type fracture, and the substrate showed plastic flow of materials in the form of slip/shear planes with extended ductility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Back-scattered SEM micrographs on HA-TiO<sub>2</sub> coating: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) planner view of as-received coating (without metallographic polishing) and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) cross-sectional view (after metallographic polishing).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Elemental mapping on the cross-section of HA-TiO<sub>2</sub> coating: (<b>a</b>) secondary electron image, (<b>b</b>) O map, (<b>c</b>) Ca map, (<b>d</b>) P map, (<b>e</b>) Ti map, (<b>f</b>) EDS layered image, and (<b>g</b>) map sum spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>TEM micrographs on HA-TiO<sub>2</sub> coating: (<b>a</b>) overall view of the coating representing different areas, (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) high resolution (HR)-TEM images of areas 1–3, respectively, as marked in (<b>a</b>) with corresponding electron diffraction pattern (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FIB-prepared micro-pillars for compression (<b>a</b>) on the substrate (β-Ti) and (<b>b</b>) on the HA-TiO<sub>2</sub> coating. Enlarged views of the micro-pillars are shown as inserts in respective images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Stress–strain curves on the cross-section of the HA-TiO<sub>2</sub> coating and substrate β-Ti metallic biomaterial subjected to micro-pillar compression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Deformed micro-pillars on the coating cross-section after compression: (<b>a</b>) micro-pilalr 1, (<b>b</b>) micro-pillar 2 and (<b>c</b>) micro-pillar 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Deformed micro-pillars on the β-Ti substrate after compression: (<b>a</b>) micro-pilalr 1, (<b>b</b>) micro-pillar 2 and (<b>c</b>) micro-pillar 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Deformed micro-pillars on coating (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and substrate (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) after compression.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 8688 KiB  
Article
Effect of Processing Route on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an Al-12Si Alloy
by Abdulrahman Alsolami, Adnan Zaman, Fahad Alshabouna, Abdulaziz Kurdi, Ahmed Degnah, Salman Alfihed, Thamer Tabbakh and Animesh Kumar Basak
Materials 2024, 17(19), 4780; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194780 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1110
Abstract
Two different microstructures of an Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy were produced, respectively, via a powder laser bed fusion (P-LBF) additive manufacturing and casting. Compared to casting, additive manufacturing of Al-based alloy requires extra care to minimize oxidation tendency. The role of the microstructure [...] Read more.
Two different microstructures of an Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy were produced, respectively, via a powder laser bed fusion (P-LBF) additive manufacturing and casting. Compared to casting, additive manufacturing of Al-based alloy requires extra care to minimize oxidation tendency. The role of the microstructure on the mechanical properties of Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy was investigated by in situ compression of the micro-pillars. The microstructure of additively manufactured specimens exhibited a sub-cellular (~700 nm) nature in the presence of melt-pool arrangements and grain boundaries. On the other hand, the microstructure of the cast alloy contains typical needle-like eutectic structures. This striking difference in microstructure had obvious effects on the plastic flow of the materials under compression. The yield and ultimate compressive strength of the additively manufactured alloy were 23.69–27.94 MPa and 75.43–81.21 MPa, respectively. The cast alloy exhibited similar yield strength (31.46 MPa); however, its ultimate compressive strength (34.95 MPa) was only half that of the additively manufactured alloy. The deformation mechanism, as unrevealed by SEM investigation on the surface as well as on the cross-section of the distorted micro-pillars, confirms the presence of ductile and quasi-ductile facture of the matrix and the Si needle, respectively, in the case of the cast alloy. In contrast, the additively manufactured alloy exhibits predominantly ductile fractures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three-dimensional ‘isometric’ view of the L-PBF Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy by optical microscopy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Backscattered electron (BSE) micrographs of the P-LBF-processed Al-12Si alloy at different magnifications on horizontal plane: (<b>a</b>) 2500× and (<b>b</b>) 30,000×.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Backscattered electron (BSE) and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) secondary electron (SE) micrographs of the P-LBF-processed Al-12Si alloy at different magnifications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Backscattered electron (BSE) and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) secondary electron (SE) micrographs of the P-LBF-processed Al-12Si alloy at different magnifications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SEM micrograph (<b>a</b>) and elemental mapping of Al (<b>b</b>) and Si (<b>c</b>) in a cast Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>X-ray diffraction spectra on L-PBF and cast Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A series of fabricated micro-pillars on cast Al-12Si (wt. %) alloy (<b>a</b>), together with an enlarged 45° view of micro-pillar on (<b>b</b>) cast and (<b>c</b>) L-FBF-processed alloy (horizontal plane), indicating the dimensions of the micro-pillar and existence of Si needles/networkers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Engineering stress–strain graphs on L-PBF and cast Al-12Si (wt. %).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Stage of the micro-pillars in course of loading at 5% intervals on cast alloy (<b>a</b>) and different planes on L-PBF-processed alloy: (<b>b</b>) horizontal plane; (<b>c</b>) lateral plane; and (<b>d</b>) frontal plane. The white arrows indicate the locations of slip/shear planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM micrograph of surface morphology (<b>a,c</b>) and cross-section (<b>b,d</b>) of distorted micro-pillars on cast alloy (<b>a,b</b>) and L-PBF alloy (<b>c,d</b>) on horizontal plane. The white arrows indicate the locations of slip/shear.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3930 KiB  
Review
The Mechanical Behavior of High-Strength Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes: A Review
by Clemente Pinto and João Fonseca
CivilEng 2024, 5(3), 591-608; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng5030032 - 31 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1300
Abstract
This review explores the mechanical behavior of high-strength concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs), focusing on their structural integrity and failure mechanisms. This study highlights the crucial role of the steel tube in providing passive confinement, which limits crack progression and enhances the ductility of [...] Read more.
This review explores the mechanical behavior of high-strength concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs), focusing on their structural integrity and failure mechanisms. This study highlights the crucial role of the steel tube in providing passive confinement, which limits crack progression and enhances the ductility of the concrete. The concept of concrete as a structural system composed of micro- and mini-pillars, derived from rock mechanics, can be a useful approach to understanding CFST behavior. The review identifies that the strength index (SI) can, in some cases, decrease with an increase in the confinement factor (ξ), particularly in high-strength and ultrahigh-strength concrete (HSC and UHSC), which seems to be different to the common understanding of confinement. The experimental results show that different crack patterns and concrete compositions significantly impact the CFST performance. For example, silica fume in concrete mixtures can reduce the strength enhancement despite increasing the unconfined compressive strength. This work advocates for a mechanistic approach to better comprehend the interaction between concrete and steel tubes, emphasizing the need for optimized concrete mixtures and improved mechanical interaction. Future research should focus on the potential of HSC and UHSC in CFST, addressing factors such as crack progression, confinement effects, and concrete–steel interaction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Material Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Relation between the strength index (SI) and the concrete compressive strength, according to references [<a href="#B4-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B5-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B6-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B7-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B8-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B9-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relation between the strength index and the confinement factor, according to references [<a href="#B4-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B5-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B6-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B7-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B8-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B9-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relation between the strength index and the confinement factor obtained in the experimental tests of circular sections, described in [<a href="#B5-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">5</a>] (adapted).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relation between the strength index and the confinement factor obtained in the experimental tests of square sections, described in [<a href="#B5-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">5</a>] (adapted).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relation between the strength index (SI) and the confinement factor (<span class="html-italic">ξ</span>), according to the results of [<a href="#B9-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">9</a>] (<b>top</b>) and [<a href="#B10-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">10</a>] (<b>bottom</b>), L = 3D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relation between the strength index (SI) and the confinement factor (<span class="html-italic">ξ</span>), according to the results of [<a href="#B11-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Apparent shear failure via instability in an inclined plane (L/D = 5, based on [<a href="#B9-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">9</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic failure mode with the formation of bulges in the tube surface due to the transversal pressure of the internal crushed concrete (L/D = 3, based on [<a href="#B5-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">5</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Instability with bending via buckling (L/D = 5 and L/D = 7), (based on [<a href="#B9-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">10</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic failure mode with local buckling near the ends of the CFST element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>CFST specimens with additional external confinement through an external steel spiral and the schematic of the inclined failure plane (based on [<a href="#B13-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">13</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Stress–strain curves with the limits between phases of internal destruction (based on [<a href="#B20-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B23-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B25-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B27-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">27</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Evolution of a crack pattern and formation of an inclined plane of failure in granite under compression (adapted from [<a href="#B30-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">30</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Increase in the crack gap due to the relative displacement of the fitted irregular faces (Fn—force normal to the irregularities in contact; Ft—tension force at the tips).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Progression of a long crack inhibiting adjacent cracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) Scheme of a granite prism h/b = 4 under unconfined compression; (<b>b</b>) formation of a macrocrack and failure via the buckling of mini-pillars [<a href="#B37-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Failure in unconfined compression with separation in compact pieces after the formation of long cracks and the concentration of small cracks in some zones (adapted from [<a href="#B20-civileng-05-00032" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Failure via global deformation and the simultaneous instability of micro-pillars forming inclined “sliding” planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Conceptual model for the inclined plane behavior, which generates forces in the tube that determines the interaction between the concrete and the tube.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 16558 KiB  
Article
Investigation on the Microstructure and Micro-Mechanical Properties of Thermal-Sprayed NiCoCrAlY High Entropy Alloy Coating
by Animesh Kumar Basak, Nachimuthu Radhika, Chander Prakash and Alokesh Pramanik
Designs 2024, 8(2), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8020037 - 20 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1367
Abstract
NiCoCrAlY high entropy alloy (HEA) coating (47.1 wt.% Ni, 23 wt.% Co, 17 wt.% Cr, 12.5 wt.% Al, and 0.4 wt.% Y) was deposited on a stainless steel subtract by atmospheric plasma spraying (APS). The as-deposited coating was about 300 μm thickness with [...] Read more.
NiCoCrAlY high entropy alloy (HEA) coating (47.1 wt.% Ni, 23 wt.% Co, 17 wt.% Cr, 12.5 wt.% Al, and 0.4 wt.% Y) was deposited on a stainless steel subtract by atmospheric plasma spraying (APS). The as-deposited coating was about 300 μm thickness with <1% porosity. The microstructure of the coating consisted of dispersed secondary phases/intermetallics in the solid solution. The stress–strain behaviour of this coating was investigated in micro-scale with the help of in situ micro-pillar compression. The experimental results show that yield and compressive stress in the cross-section of the coating was higher (1.27 ± 0.10 MPa and 2.19 ± 0.10 GPa, respectively) than that of the planar direction (0.85 ± 0.09 MPa and 1.20 ± 0.08 GPa, respectively). The various secondary/intermetallic phases (γ′–Ni3Al, β–NiAl) that were present in the coating microstructure hinder the lattice movement during compression, according to Orowan mechanism. In addition to that, the direction of the loading to that of the orientation of the phase/splat boundaries dictate the crack propagation architecture, which results in difference in the micro-mechanical properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-manufacturing Testing and Characterization of Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>SEM micrographs on NiCoCrAlY coating: (<b>a</b>) cross-sectional and (<b>b</b>) planar view after metallographic polishing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>High-magnification SEM micrographs on the cross-section of the NiCoCrAlY coating: (<b>a</b>) secondary electron (SE) and (<b>b</b>) back-scattered electron (BSE) images after metallographic polishing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) High-magnification SEM micrograph on the cross-section of the NiCoCrAlY coating. The indicated points in the image are the locations of the EDX analysis. (<b>b</b>–<b>j</b>) EDS spectra obtained from the locations indicated in (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) High-magnification SEM micrograph on the cross-section of the NiCoCrAlY coating. The indicated points in the image are the locations of the EDX analysis. (<b>b</b>–<b>j</b>) EDS spectra obtained from the locations indicated in (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Elemental mapping on the cross-section of the NiCoCrAlY coating: (<b>a</b>) EDS layered image, (<b>b</b>) Ni map, (<b>c</b>) Co map, (<b>d</b>) Cr map, (<b>e</b>) Al map, (<b>f</b>) Y map, and (<b>g</b>) map sum spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Elemental mapping on the surface (planar) of the NiCoCrAlY coating: (<b>a</b>) EDS layered image, (<b>b</b>) Ni map, (<b>c</b>) Co map, (<b>d</b>) Cr map, (<b>e</b>) Al map, (<b>f</b>) Y map, and (<b>g</b>) map sum spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>X-ray diffraction spectra on as-sprayed NiCoCrAlY coating.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Representative TEM micrographs on the coating cross-section: (<b>a</b>) overall all view of the coating showing individual ‘splats’, (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) higher magnification images, and (<b>d</b>) HR-TEM image with corresponding SAD pattern of γ′-Ni<sub>3</sub>Al on 101 zone axis, as an insert.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A series of as-fabricated micro-pillars on the (<b>a</b>) cross-section and (<b>b</b>) planar direction of the coating. Enlarged 45° view of the micro-pillars are shown as an insert.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Average engineering stress–strain curves on the planar and cross-section direction of the NiCoCrAlY coating subjected to in situ micro-pillar compression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Deformed micro-pillars (45° tilted SEM view) after compression on cross-sectional direction. State of the micropillars at the beginning of compression (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and at the end of compression (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>). The white arrows indicate the fracture lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Deformed micro-pillars (45° tilted SEM view) after compression on planar direction. State of the micropillars at the beginning of compression (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and at the end of compression (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>). The white arrows indicate the fracture lines.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2899 KiB  
Article
Real-Time Observation of Nanoscale Kink Band Mediated Plasticity in Ion-Irradiated Graphite: An In Situ TEM Study
by Melonie P. Thomas, Ryan Schoell, Nahid Sultan Al-Mamun, Winson Kuo, John Watt, William Windes, Khalid Hattar and Aman Haque
Materials 2024, 17(4), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17040895 - 15 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1649
Abstract
Graphite IG-110 is a synthetic polycrystalline material used as a neutron moderator in reactors. Graphite is inherently brittle and is known to exhibit a further increase in brittleness due to radiation damage at room temperature. To understand the irradiation effects on pre-existing defects [...] Read more.
Graphite IG-110 is a synthetic polycrystalline material used as a neutron moderator in reactors. Graphite is inherently brittle and is known to exhibit a further increase in brittleness due to radiation damage at room temperature. To understand the irradiation effects on pre-existing defects and their overall influence on external load, micropillar compression tests were performed using in situ nanoindentation in the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for both pristine and ion-irradiated samples. While pristine specimens showed brittle and subsequent catastrophic failure, the 2.8 MeV Au2+ ion (fluence of 4.378 × 1014 cm−2) irradiated specimens sustained extensive plasticity at room temperature without failure. In situ TEM characterization showed nucleation of nanoscale kink band structures at numerous sites, where the localized plasticity appeared to close the defects and cracks while allowing large average strain. We propose that compressive mechanical stress due to dimensional change during ion irradiation transforms buckled basal layers in graphite into kink bands. The externally applied load during the micropillar tests proliferates the nucleation and motion of kink bands to accommodate the large plastic strain. The inherent non-uniformity of graphite microstructure promotes such strain localization, making kink bands the predominant mechanism behind unprecedented toughness in an otherwise brittle material. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Characterization Techniques on Nuclear Fuels and Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) SRIM simulated electronic (dashed line) and nuclear (solid line) energy loss profiles as a function of penetration depth for 2.8 MeV Au ions. (<b>b</b>) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs showing end view of the irradiated set of micropillar compression testing specimens fabricated by FIB-SEM. The tables include nominal values of varying dimensions of each pillar and measured by SEM and TEM micrographs. The yellow measurements indicate the side of the pillar parallel to the electron beam of the TEM. (<b>c</b>) Top view of the specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Raman spectroscopy performed on the pristine and ion-irradiated IG-110 specimens (<b>b</b>) comparison of the FWHM and I<sub>D</sub>/I<sub>G</sub> parameters compiled in the literature for various polycrystalline graphite samples (adapted from [<a href="#B40-materials-17-00895" class="html-bibr">40</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Micropillar compression testing results (load-displacement data) for (<b>a</b>) pristine and (<b>b</b>) ion-irradiated IG-110 graphite specimens. TEM bright-field micrographs of micropillars showing the microstructure of (<b>c</b>) pristine and (Au-ion irradiated specimen prior to any mechanical loading. (<b>e</b>) High-resolution bright-field TEM micrograph of (<b>d</b>) with kink bands and kink boundaries labeled with white arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Snapshots from in situ TEM micropillar compression testing of an ion-irradiated IG-110 graphite specimen (pillar 1 of <a href="#materials-17-00895-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b). (<b>a</b>) Load-displacement plot on which various load conditions are indicated: (<b>b</b>) load = 0 μN, (<b>c</b>) load = 190 μN, (<b>d</b>) load = 225 μN, (<b>e</b>) load = 275 μN, and (<b>f</b>) load = 150 μN upon flat punch retraction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic of kink band formation and conjugate delamination in graphite due to ion irradiation: (<b>a</b>) pristine graphite, (<b>b</b>) contraction in basal layers due to depth-dependent ion damage, resulting in ripplocations, (<b>c</b>) kink band formation under further compression, (<b>d</b>) conjugate delamination under further expansion. (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) TEM images from the plastically deformed irradiated specimen showing the kink bands at various magnifications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Irradiated micropillar specimen at different loading conditions, (<b>a</b>) P = 0 μN, (<b>b</b>) P<sub>max</sub> = 275 μN, and (<b>c</b>) P = 0 μN after unloading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Kink-band mediated plasticity observed in all irradiated specimens from <a href="#materials-17-00895-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b and <a href="#materials-17-00895-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b. Kink bands are denoted with white color arrows. The scale bar is 500 nm.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 7841 KiB  
Article
Micro-Scale Deformation Aspects of Additively Fabricated Stainless Steel 316L under Compression
by Abdulaziz Kurdi, Ahmed Degnah, Thamer Tabbakh, Husain Alnaser and Animesh Kumar Basak
Materials 2024, 17(2), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020439 - 17 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1475
Abstract
The deformation aspects associated with the micro-mechanical properties of the powder laser bed fusion (P-LBF) additively manufactured stainless steel 316L were investigated in the present work. Toward that, micro-pillars were fabricated on different planes of the stainless steel 316L specimen with respect to [...] Read more.
The deformation aspects associated with the micro-mechanical properties of the powder laser bed fusion (P-LBF) additively manufactured stainless steel 316L were investigated in the present work. Toward that, micro-pillars were fabricated on different planes of the stainless steel 316L specimen with respect to build direction, and an in situ compression was carried out inside the chamber of the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results were compared against the compositionally similar stainless steel 316L, which was fabricated by a conventional method, that is, casting. The post-deformed micro-pillars on the both materials were examined by electron microscopy. The P-LBF processed steel exhibits equiaxed as well as elongated grains of different orientation with the characteristics of the melt-pool type arrangements. In contrast, the cast alloy shows typical circular-type grains in the presence of micro-twins. The yield stress and ultimate compressive stress of P-LBF fabricated steel were about 431.02 ± 15.51 − 474.44 ± 23.49 MPa and 547.78 ± 29.58 − 682.59 ± 21.59 MPa, respectively. Whereas for the cast alloy, it was about 322.38 ± 19.78 MPa and 477.11 ± 25.31 MPa, respectively. Thus, the outcome of this study signifies that the AM-processed samples possess higher mechanical properties than conventionally processed alloy of similar composition. Irrespective of the processing method, both specimens exhibit ductile-type deformation, which is typical for metallic alloys. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>As fabricated block of stainless steel 316L fabricated by L-PBF process. The direction of build (z) is also indicated in the figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Backscattered electron image (BSE) of P-LBF SS 316L sample on horizontal plane at low (×500) (<b>a</b>) and high (×2500) (<b>b</b>) magnification exhibiting the morphology of the grain evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Backscattered electron image (BSE) of L-PBF SS 316L sample on the frontal (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and lateral (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) planes at low (×500) (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and high (×2500) (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) magnifications, exhibiting the morphology of the grain evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Backscattered electron image (BSE) of wrought SS 316L at low (×500) and (<b>b</b>) high (×2500) magnifications. The arrows indicate the location of twins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>EDX spectra on (<b>a</b>) L-PBF and (<b>b</b>) wrought alloy, confirming the elemental composition of the currently investigated specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) A number of micro-pillars on the horizontal plane of the L-PBF SS 316L sample together with high magnification image (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Characteristic stress–strain graphs obtained on L-PBF processed and wrought SS 316L. The black arrows indicate the sudden drops in stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Physical outlook of the compressed micro-pillar with corresponding load–displacement curve at the given interval: (<b>a</b>) beginning, (<b>b</b>) middle and (<b>c</b>) just before the completion of the compression experiment. The black arrows indicate the sudden drops in stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Outlook of the deformed micro-pillars on different planes of L-PBF processed alloy: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) horizontal, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) frontal and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) lateral planes. Higher magnification (×35,000) images of the marked areas (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) are shown next to it (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Outlook of the deformed micro-pillars on different planes of L-PBF processed alloy: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) horizontal, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) frontal and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) lateral planes. Higher magnification (×35,000) images of the marked areas (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) are shown next to it (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Outlook of the deformed micro-pillars on wrought SS 316L higher magnification (×35,000) images of the marked area (<b>a</b>) is shown next to it (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 13467 KiB  
Review
Mechanical Properties of Bulk Metallic Glasses Additively Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A Review
by Haojie Luo and Yulei Du
Materials 2023, 16(21), 7034; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16217034 - 3 Nov 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2044
Abstract
Bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) display excellent strength, high hardness, exceptional wear resistance and corrosion resistance owing to its amorphous structure. However, the manufacturing of large-sized and complex shaped BMG parts faces significant difficulties, which seriously hinders their applications. Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) [...] Read more.
Bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) display excellent strength, high hardness, exceptional wear resistance and corrosion resistance owing to its amorphous structure. However, the manufacturing of large-sized and complex shaped BMG parts faces significant difficulties, which seriously hinders their applications. Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a typical additive manufacturing (AM) technique with a cooling rate of up to 108 K/s, which not only allows for the formation of amorphous structures but also solves the forming problem of complex-shaped BMG parts. In recent years, a large amount of work has been carried out on the LPBF processing of BMGs. This review mainly summarizes the latest progress in the field of LPBF additively manufactured BMGs focusing on their mechanical properties. We first briefly review the BMG alloy systems that have been additively manufactured using LPBF, then the mechanical properties of LPBF-fabricated BMGs including the micro- and nano-hardness, micropillar compressive performance, and macro-compressive and tensile performance are clarified. Next, the relationship between the mechanical properties and microstructure of BMGs produced via LPBF are analyzed. Finally, the measures for improving the mechanical properties of LPBF-fabricated BMGs are discussed. This review can provide readers with an essential comprehension of the structural and mechanical properties of LPBF-manufactured BMGs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the LPBF process [<a href="#B35-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Amorphous Zr<sub>52.5</sub>Cu<sub>17.9</sub>Ni<sub>14.6</sub>Al<sub>10</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub> BMG parts manufactured using LPBF: (<b>a</b>) gear sample; (<b>b</b>) TOS structure and two gyroid structures [<a href="#B39-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">39</a>]. Amorphous Zr<sub>60.14</sub>Cu<sub>22.31</sub>Fe<sub>4.85</sub>Al<sub>9.7</sub>Ag<sub>3</sub> BMG components produced using LPBF for biomaterial applications: (<b>c</b>) acetabular cup; (<b>d</b>) femoral prosthesis [<a href="#B46-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. (<b>e</b>) Amorphous Zr<sub>60</sub>Fe<sub>10</sub>Cu<sub>20</sub>Al<sub>10</sub> BMG gear sample (diameter 35 mm and height 5 mm) [<a href="#B48-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">48</a>]. (<b>f</b>) Amorphous Zr<sub>52.5</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>Al<sub>10</sub>Ni<sub>14.6</sub>Cu<sub>17.9</sub> BMG scaffolds produced using LPBF [<a href="#B40-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The 3D scaffold structure of partially crystallized Fe<sub>74</sub>Mo<sub>4</sub>P<sub>10</sub>C<sub>7.5</sub>B<sub>2.5</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>, where the arrows indicate the position of the X-ray diffraction measures of the samples; (<b>b</b>) XRD patterns of a corner of the scaffold and the cylinder, showing obvious crystal phases [<a href="#B38-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. (<b>c</b>) An FeCrMoCB BMG cylinder with a size of Ø 45 × 30 mm, (<b>d</b>) XRD of FeCrMoCB cylinders (bottom, middle, and top) [<a href="#B49-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Fully crystallized Al<sub>85</sub>Ni<sub>5</sub>Y<sub>6</sub>Co<sub>2</sub>Fe<sub>2</sub> gear prepared using LPBF, with CAD model of the gear in the upper left corner; (<b>b</b>) corresponding XRD pattern showing obvious crystallization peaks [<a href="#B58-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">58</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Some amorphous Cu<sub>50</sub>Zr<sub>43</sub>Al<sub>7</sub> parts with large sizes and complex shapes, which were produced with the optimal LPBF process parameters (E = 25 J/mm<sup>3</sup>); (<b>e</b>) XRD plots of different energy densities, where the samples with E = 25 J/mm<sup>3</sup> are almost completely amorphous; (<b>f</b>) DSC plots of the optimized sample and the original powder, which shows the typical features of amorphous phase, where the arrows point to the glass transition temperature (T<sub>g</sub>) and the crystallization onset temperature (T<sub>x</sub>) [<a href="#B61-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">61</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Amorphous and complex structural Ti<sub>47</sub>Cu<sub>38</sub>Zr<sub>7.5</sub>Fe<sub>2.5</sub>Sn<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>1</sub>Ag<sub>2</sub> components made using LPBF. (<b>b</b>) The corresponding XRD patterns of cylindrical LPBF-fabricated samples and cast rods. Crystal peaks only occur in gas-atomized powders [<a href="#B56-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">56</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) The μ-CT image of Pd-based BMG prepared using optimized LPBF parameters (P = 60 W), exhibiting no cracks and high densities, with a porosity of only 0.4%; (<b>b</b>) XRD patterns from two cross-sections of printed samples, X-Y and X-Z; (<b>c</b>) Fracture morphology of the optimized cylinder; (<b>d</b>) compression stress–strain curve, showing excellent compressive strength [<a href="#B64-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">64</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Microhardness results (HV0.1). (<b>b</b>) Hardness map obtained from 165 indentations [<a href="#B64-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">64</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic of the nanoindentation test locations of LPBF-fabricated AMZ4 BMG samples. (<b>b</b>) SEM of 1600 indentations performed. (<b>c</b>) The 10 × 10 μm<sup>2</sup> nanohardness testing area. (<b>d</b>) A histogram displaying the Gaussian distribution of hardness [<a href="#B36-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of LPBF-fabricated Fe<sub>55</sub>Cr<sub>25</sub>Mo<sub>16</sub>B<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub> BMG micropillars in compression tests; (<b>c</b>) stress–strain curves; (<b>d</b>) cross-sectional microscope images of BMGs [<a href="#B52-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Compressive stress–strain curves of as-cast and LPBF-fabricated samples, where the E = 14.3 J/mm<sup>3</sup> sample has the highest fracture strength of 1560 MPa, but is still lower than the corresponding cast sample; (<b>b</b>) fracture surface of LPBF-fabricated samples with E = 14.3 J/mm<sup>3</sup>, where a clear crack is observed; (<b>c</b>) higher magnification image of region in (<b>b</b>), which shows the presence of unmelted powder [<a href="#B62-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tensile test results of AMZ4 BMG fabricated using LPBF with a maximum strength of 1080 MPa; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) SEM images of the fracture surface, where (<b>b</b>) shows lack of fusion defects and unmelted powder particles, and (<b>c</b>) shows a dimple pattern [<a href="#B101-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">101</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) 3D spatial distribution and morphology of porosity defects inside the cylinder revealed by μ-CT images; (<b>b</b>) the size distribution of the porosity defects; snapshots of the X-Y (<b>c</b>) and X-Z (<b>d</b>) cross-sections, with the porosity flaws displayed in black [<a href="#B36-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) The μ-CT of the LPBF-fabricated Zr-based BMG compression sample. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Fracture surfaces of the LPBF-fabricated BMG sample. Two intersecting fracture surfaces can be seen in (<b>b</b>), and unmelted powder particles were found in some larger LoFs in (<b>c</b>) [<a href="#B40-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>SEM-BSE images of X-Y sections of single-track molten pools fabricated using LPBF: (<b>a</b>) 200 W; (<b>b</b>) 160 W; (<b>c</b>) 120 W; and (<b>d</b>) 80 W. White arrows point to cracks and red arrows point to pores [<a href="#B57-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">57</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) Side view of 3D-printed Zr-based BMG revealing the distribution of the MP and HAZ; (<b>b</b>) TEM bright-field picture displaying the MP and HAZ borders; (<b>c</b>) diffraction pattern of selected locations in the HAZ [<a href="#B41-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) Relative density plots of LPBF-fabricated Fe<sub>68.3</sub>C<sub>6.9</sub>Si<sub>2.5</sub>B<sub>6.7</sub>P<sub>8.7</sub>Cr<sub>2.3</sub>Mo<sub>2.5</sub>Al<sub>2.1</sub> BMG samples versus process parameters, where the darker the color, the higher the densities. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) OM images of LPBF-fabricated samples, where white arrows correspond to different densities [<a href="#B51-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">51</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(<b>a</b>) LPBF processing maps displaying different feature regions. Different colors and markings are used to highlight areas processed by different laser powers and scanning speeds; (<b>b</b>) printed samples of the corresponding LPBF process parameters [<a href="#B52-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>(<b>a</b>) P-R scanning strategy: using a chessboard strategy to melt powder for the first time, followed by melting again using random pulses [<a href="#B53-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Nanoindentation spectra of Zr<sub>52.5</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>Cu<sub>17.9</sub>Ni<sub>14.6</sub>Al<sub>10</sub> BMG under different scanning speeds and strategies [<a href="#B39-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">39</a>]. (<b>c</b>–<b>h</b>) The μ- CT plots and porosity distribution of Zr<sub>52.5</sub>Cu<sub>17.9</sub>Ni<sub>14.6</sub>Al<sub>10</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub> samples under different scanning strategies. Sample 1: (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), a filling line scan with 200 μm distance (E = 13 J/mm<sup>3</sup>, ρ<sub>Relative</sub> = 97.7%). Sample 2: (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), a chessboard strategy (E = 12 J/mm<sup>3</sup> ρ<sub>Relative</sub> = 97.2%). Sample 3: (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), a unidirectional scanning vector rotated 90 ° in adjacent layers (E = 13 J/mm<sup>3</sup>, ρ<sub>Relative</sub> = 98.5%) [<a href="#B40-materials-16-07034" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2991 KiB  
Article
Formation and Characterization of the Recast Layer Formed on Inconel 718 during Wire Electro Discharge Machining
by Bandar Alkahlan, Thamer Tabbakh, Abdulaziz Kurdi, Alokesh Pramanik and Animesh K. Basak
Materials 2023, 16(3), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030930 - 18 Jan 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2361
Abstract
The present work investigates the formation and microstructural and micro-mechanical characterization of the recast layer that formed on Inconel 718 alloy in the course of the wire electro-discharge machining (WEDM). The as-machined surface contains globules, shallow cracks, and re-deposition of molten materials, together [...] Read more.
The present work investigates the formation and microstructural and micro-mechanical characterization of the recast layer that formed on Inconel 718 alloy in the course of the wire electro-discharge machining (WEDM). The as-machined surface contains globules, shallow cracks, and re-deposition of molten materials, together with the elements from the decomposition of wire electrode and electrolyte, which does not exceed beyond the surface of the recast layer. Under presently investigated machining parameters, the recast layer was about 6.2 ± 2.1 µm thick. There was no presence of a heat-affected zone (HAZ), as otherwise indicated for other hard-to-cut materials. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) investigations show that the microstructure of the recast layer is similar to that of bulk alloy. Micro-mechanical characterizations of the recast layer were investigated via in-situ micro-pillar compression on the micro-pillars fabricated on the recast layer. The strength of the superficial layer (1151.6 ± 51.1 MPa) was about 2.2 times higher than that of the base material (523.2 ± 22.1 MPa), as revealed by the in-situ micro-pillar compression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-conventional Machining of Hard Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Optical photo of the cylindrical block cut by WEDM from the workpiece with the location of the recast layer (overlay) and machined surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) A series of FIB-SEM prepared micro-pillars in the middle of Ø 30 μm pit on the recast layer, and (<b>b</b>) high magnification images on one of the micro-pillars together with dimensions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative features on the machined surface of Inconel 718 after WEDM on (<b>a</b>) cylindrical surface and (<b>b</b>) cross-together with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectra on (<b>c</b>) cylindrical surface, (<b>d</b>) cross-section, and (<b>e</b>) bulk material.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the recast layer: (<b>a</b>) Brightfield (BF)-TEM image together with bulk material, (<b>b</b>) the interface of the recast layer with the bulk material, (<b>c</b>) high-resolution (HR) TEM image of the interface, and (<b>d</b>) corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>EBSD investigation of the recast layer: (<b>a</b>) Electron image with overlay map area, (<b>b</b>) image quality (IQ) map, (<b>c</b>) inverse pole figure (IPF) map, and (<b>d</b>) pole figure (PF) map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Representative stress–strain curves on recast layer and bulk Inconel 718 alloy derived from load-displacement curves under in-situ micro-pillar compression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>State of the micro-pillar at different strain intervals in the course of compression: (<b>a</b>) 1%, (<b>b</b>) 3%, and (<b>c</b>) 10% strain.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 13290 KiB  
Article
Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Additively Manufactured CoCrFeNiMn High-Entropy Alloy: Process Optimization, Microscale Mechanical Mechanism, and High-Cycle Fatigue Behavior
by Jianrui Zhang, Yabin Yan and Bo Li
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8560; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238560 - 1 Dec 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2443
Abstract
The equiatomic CoCrFeNiMn high-entropy alloy (HEA) possesses excellent properties including exceptional strength–ductility synergy, high corrosion resistance, and good thermal stability. Selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing facilitates the convenient fabrication of the CoCrFeNiMn HEA parts with complex geometries. Here, the SLM process optimization [...] Read more.
The equiatomic CoCrFeNiMn high-entropy alloy (HEA) possesses excellent properties including exceptional strength–ductility synergy, high corrosion resistance, and good thermal stability. Selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing facilitates the convenient fabrication of the CoCrFeNiMn HEA parts with complex geometries. Here, the SLM process optimization was conducted to achieve a high relative density of as-built CoCrFeNiMn HEA bulks. The mechanisms of process-induced defects and process control were elucidated. The microscale mechanical behaviors were analyzed through in situ scanning electron microscopy observation during the compression tests on micro-pillars of the as-built HEA. The stress–strain characteristics by repeated slip and mechanism of “dislocation avalanche” during the compression of micro-pillars were discussed. The high-cycle fatigue tests of the as-built HEA were performed. It was found that a large number of nano-twins were induced by the fatigue, causing a non-negligible cycle softening phenomenon. The effects of promoted ductility due to the fatigue-induced nano-twins were illustrated. This work has some significance for the engineering application of the SLM additively manufactured CoCrFeNiMn HEA parts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagrams of SLM device (<b>a</b>) and laser scanning strategy (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Measurement in air and liquid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>External dimensions of plate specimen (mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between energy density and SLMed part density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of powder layer thickness (<b>a</b>) and scanning spacing (<b>b</b>) on SLMed part density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cross-section of SLMed HEA sample with obvious (<b>a</b>) and permissible defects (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram of the pore formation mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Defects in the SLM process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM image of FIB cone structure of SLM HEA: (<b>a</b>) FIB sampling section is perpendicular to the BD and (<b>b</b>) FIB sampling section is parallel to the BD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Micro-area SEM and IPF images of SLM HEA FIB cone structure sampling (note: the FIB sampling section is parallel to BD and FIB sampling as random polycrystalline microdomains).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Typical sample micro-scale quasi-static compression load–displacement curve: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) indicate the TD; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) indicate the BD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>SEM morphology of SLM HEA FIB cone structure after in situ quasi-static compression: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) FIB sampling section is perpendicular to the BD and (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) the FIB sampling section is parallel to the BD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Nano-scale micro-pore clusters on the outer surface of SLM HEA FIB cone structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Load–displacement curve of high cycle fatigue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>SEM image of typical SLM HEA high-cycle fatigue fracture: (<b>a</b>) loading direction is perpendicular to BD; (<b>b</b>) loading direction is parallel to BD (note: the arrow indicates the morphology of typical fatigue striations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>EBSD analysis results of microstructure near the fracture surface of the fatigue failure specimen of the SLM HEA: (<b>a</b>) comparison of all Euler diagrams and diffraction bands, (<b>b</b>) diffraction band comparison chart, (<b>c</b>) large angle (&gt;15° black line) grain boundary diagram, (<b>d</b>) IPF_X inverse pole figure, (<b>e</b>) IPF_Y inverse pole figure, (<b>f</b>) IPF_Z inverse pole figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>EBSD analysis results of microstructure near the fracture surface of the fatigue failure specimen of the SLM HEA (the detection area is the white solid frame area in <a href="#materials-15-08560-f016" class="html-fig">Figure 16</a>a): p.(<b>a</b>) comparison of all Euler diagrams and diffraction bands, (<b>b</b>) diffraction band comparison chart, (<b>c</b>) large angle (&gt;15° black line) and small angle (&lt;15° and &gt;5° red line) grain boundary diagram, (<b>d</b>) IPF_X inverse pole figure, (<b>e</b>) IPF_Y inverse pole figure, (<b>f</b>) IPF_Z inverse pole figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>EBSD analysis results of microstructure near the fracture surface of the fatigue failure specimen of the SLM HEA (the detection area is the white dotted frame area in <a href="#materials-15-08560-f016" class="html-fig">Figure 16</a>a): p.(<b>a</b>) comparison of all Euler diagrams and diffraction bands, (<b>b</b>) diffraction band comparison chart, (<b>c</b>) large angle (&gt;15° black line) and small angle (&lt;15° and &gt;5° red line) grain boundary diagram, (<b>d</b>) IPF_X inverse pole figure, (<b>e</b>) IPF_Y inverse pole figure, (<b>f</b>) IPF_Z inverse pole figure.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3773 KiB  
Article
Micropillar Compression of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steels after 2 MeV Proton Irradiation: A Comparison Study between Planar and Cross-Sectional Micropillars
by Ching-Heng Shiau, Miguel Pena, Yongchang Li, Sisi Xiang, Cheng Sun, Michael D. McMurtrey and Lin Shao
Metals 2022, 12(11), 1843; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111843 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1908
Abstract
A micropillar compression study with two different techniques was performed on proton-irradiated additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steels. The sample was irradiated at 360 °C using 2 MeV protons to 1.8 average displacement per atom (dpa) in the near-surface region. A comparison study [...] Read more.
A micropillar compression study with two different techniques was performed on proton-irradiated additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steels. The sample was irradiated at 360 °C using 2 MeV protons to 1.8 average displacement per atom (dpa) in the near-surface region. A comparison study with mechanical test and microstructure characterization was made between planar and cross-sectional pillars prepared from the irradiated surface. While a 2 MeV proton irradiation creates a relatively flat damage zone up to 12 µm, the dpa gradient by a factor of 2 leads to significant dpa uncertainty along the pillar height direction for the conventional planar technique. Cross-sectional pillars can significantly reduce such dpa uncertainty. From one single sample, three cross-sectional pillars were able to show dpa-dependent hardening. Furthermore, post-compression transmission electron microscopy allows the determination of the deformation mechanism of individual micropillars. Cross-sectional micropillar compression can be used to study radiation-induced mechanical property changes with better resolution and less data fluctuation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical Behavior of Reactor Structural Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>SRIM calculated dpa vs. depth in 2 MeV proton irradiated AM 316L SS. The inset is an SEM image of a typical planar micropillar prepared. The gray boxes refer to the cross-sectional micropillars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematics of (<b>a</b>) ion irradiation and (<b>b</b>) post-irradiation micropillar preparation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SEM image of pillars that were prepared on the cross-section of the irradiated sample. All the pillars were prepared from the same grain. The arrows refer to the proton beam direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Bright-field TEM image of voids and statistics of void size distributions, and (<b>b</b>) dark-field TEM image of dislocations and their size distributions. The depth is about 5 µm beneath the surface (adapted from ref. [<a href="#B12-metals-12-01843" class="html-bibr">12</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Resolved shear stress (RSS) vs. strain curves were obtained from the selected planar pillars of (<b>a</b>) unirradiated and (<b>b</b>) irradiated AM 316L (adapted from ref. [<a href="#B12-metals-12-01843" class="html-bibr">12</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Engineering stress vs. strain curves and SEM images after compression tests for (<b>a</b>) 0 dpa pillar, (<b>b</b>) 1.71 dpa pillar, and (<b>c</b>) 2.33 dpa pillar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>TEM image from the compressed 0 dpa pillar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>TEM image obtained from the compressed 1.71 dpa pillar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) TEM image and (<b>b</b>) Fourier filtered high resolution TEM image, both obtained from the compressed 2.33 dpa pillar. The red lines indicate the atom rows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of critical resolved shear stress as a function of local dpa, obtained from planar and cross-sectional pillar compression.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 5163 KiB  
Communication
Nanolayered CoCrFeNi/Graphene Composites with High Strength and Crack Resistance
by Xiaobin Feng, Ke Cao, Xiege Huang, Guodong Li and Yang Lu
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(12), 2113; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122113 - 20 Jun 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2454
Abstract
Emerging high-entropy alloy (HEA) films achieve high strength but generally show ineludible brittle fractures, strongly restricting their micro/nano-mechanical and functional applications. Nanolayered (NL) CoCrFeNi/graphene composites are elaborately fabricated via magnetron sputtering and the transfer process. It is uncovered that NL CoCrFeNi/graphene composite pillars [...] Read more.
Emerging high-entropy alloy (HEA) films achieve high strength but generally show ineludible brittle fractures, strongly restricting their micro/nano-mechanical and functional applications. Nanolayered (NL) CoCrFeNi/graphene composites are elaborately fabricated via magnetron sputtering and the transfer process. It is uncovered that NL CoCrFeNi/graphene composite pillars exhibit a simultaneous ultra-high strength of 4.73 GPa and considerable compressive plasticity of over 20%. Detailed electron microscope observations and simulations reveal that the monolayer graphene interface can effectively block the crack propagation and stimulate dislocations to accommodate further deformation. Our findings open avenues for the fabrication of high-performance, HEA-based composites, thereby addressing the challenges and unmet needs in flexible electronics and mechanical metamaterials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Review in Nanofabrication and Nanomanufacturing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic figure of the fabrication of NL HEA/graphene composites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Characterization of CoCrFeNi HEA film. (<b>a</b>) The SEM cross-sectional observation of CoCrFeNi HEA film; (<b>b</b>) the SEM image of the HEA film surface inserted with the XRD patterns; (<b>c</b>) a representative TEM cross-sectional observation of CoCrFeNi HEA film; (<b>d</b>) the corresponding HRTEM image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Characterization of the monolayer graphene and its assembling. TEM observation of (<b>a</b>) the freestanding graphene before transfer and (<b>b</b>) the edge of the suspended graphene; SEM observation of (<b>c</b>) graphene on the HEA surface and (<b>d</b>) cross-sectional NL HEA/graphene composite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of (<b>a</b>) as-fabricated NL HEA/graphene micropillar; (<b>b</b>) the uniaxial micro-compression mechanical testing; (<b>c</b>) uniaxial compressive stress–strain curves of NL HEA/graphene micropillars; (<b>d</b>) the strength vs. the external size of the NL HEA/graphene micropillar compared with other related materials, including nanocrystalline (NC) Al<sub>0.1</sub>CoCrFeNi HEA film pillar, NL CoCrFeNi/Cu micropillar, single crystalline (SC) [111]-orientated AlCoCrFeNi HEA pillar, SC [001]-orientated FeCoNiCuPd HEA pillar, and NL Ni/graphene pillar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Postmortem SEM (<b>a</b>) front view; (<b>b</b>) side view of deformed NL HEA/graphene micropillar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) The CoCrFeNi/graphene/CoCrFeNi atomic configuration; (<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>) the corresponding atomic shear strain maps at the compressive strain of 16.0, 16.1, 16.2, and 16.4%; (<b>c</b>) the CoCrFeNi/intermittent graphene/CoCrFeNi atomic configuration; (<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) the corresponding atomic shear strain maps at the compressive strain of 0, 5.4, 5.6, and 6.0%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The calculated compressive stress–strain curves of NL CoCrFeNi/Gr composites with continuous graphene and intermittent graphene inserted with the corresponding configurations of graphene at 15.9% compressive strain.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 1780 KiB  
Article
Hydrogen Degassing of Zirconium under High-Vacuum Conditions
by Francesco Fagnoni and Piotr Konarski
Metals 2022, 12(5), 868; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050868 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2436
Abstract
Micromechanics techniques, such as nano-indentation and micro-pillar compression, can be applied to study hydrogen-charged zirconium alloys at elevated temperatures, which is highly relevant for the nuclear industry. Such experiments are often conducted inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM) under high-vacuum conditions (10−5 [...] Read more.
Micromechanics techniques, such as nano-indentation and micro-pillar compression, can be applied to study hydrogen-charged zirconium alloys at elevated temperatures, which is highly relevant for the nuclear industry. Such experiments are often conducted inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM) under high-vacuum conditions (10−5 mbar). The combination of a high-temperature and high-vacuum environment causes some hydrogen to escape from the sample into the chamber. Although this effect is evident at temperatures above 600 °C, the extent of hydrogen desorption at lower temperatures is still unclear. In the presented study, the desorption of hydrogen was assessed in zirconium cladding tube material under temperature and hydrogen content conditions comparable to those faced by used nuclear fuel during dry storage. The measured hydrogen loss due to the high vacuum was compared to the simulations obtained using an extended version of a hydrogen behavior tool developed at PSI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Characterization and Testing of Nuclear Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hydrogenation equipment overview with highlighted main components: (1) hydrogen purifier, (2) furnace, (3) dosing cell, (4) high-vacuum cell, (5) high-vacuum pump, (6) computer monitoring, (7) pressure sensor controller, and (8) low-vacuum pump. The same equipment was used also to induce the hydrogen degassing in high-temperature/high-vacuum conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cladding tube before hydrogenation (top) and after sectioning in 5 mm rings prior to desorption (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hydrogen concentration measured in low (<b>a</b>) and high (<b>b</b>) hydrogen content cladding tubes. The dashed lines indicate upper and lower bounds, and the solid lines show the hydrogen concentration used as a target during hydrogen charging. The error bars correspond to the experimental uncertainty of the HVE measurements, equal to the highest between the uncertainty of the measurement due to the standard deviation in the hydrogen content of the calibration pins and the standard deviation among the three homologues sections of the measured rings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simulation results (in orange) compared with experimental measurements (in blue) of the samples subjected to low (<b>a</b>) and high (<b>b</b>) hydrogen enrichment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relative difference between the estimated initial hydrogen concentration in the high-concentration samples and the concentration measured after the heat treatment.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 11118 KiB  
Article
Electrodeposition and Micro-Mechanical Property Characterization of Nickel–Cobalt Alloys toward Design of MEMS Components
by Yiming Jiang, Chun-Yi Chen, Xun Luo, Daisuke Yamane, Masanori Mizoguchi, Osamu Kudo, Ryu Maeda, Masato Sone and Tso-Fu Mark Chang
Electrochem 2022, 3(2), 198-210; https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3020012 - 13 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2756
Abstract
Nickel–cobalt alloys were prepared by alloy electrodeposition with a sulfamate bath, and the mechanical properties on the micro-scale were evaluated for the application as micro-components in miniaturized electronic devices. Nickel bromide and a commercially available surface brightener were used as the additives. The [...] Read more.
Nickel–cobalt alloys were prepared by alloy electrodeposition with a sulfamate bath, and the mechanical properties on the micro-scale were evaluated for the application as micro-components in miniaturized electronic devices. Nickel bromide and a commercially available surface brightener were used as the additives. The cobalt content increased from 21.5 to 60.1 at.% after addition of nickel bromide into the bath, and the grain size refined from 21.1 to 13.2 nm when the surface brightener was used. The mechanical properties on the micro-scale were evaluated by micro-compression test using micro-pillar type specimens fabricated by a focused ion beam system to take the sample size effect into consideration. The yield strength of the nickel–cobalt alloy having an average grain size at 13.9 nm and cobalt content of 66.6 at.% reached 2.37 GPa, revealing influences from the sample size, grain boundary strengthening, and solid solution strengthening effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Electrochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>SEM images of the nickel–cobalt alloys electrodeposited with a current density at 15 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and with the bath containing (<b>a</b>) no additives, (<b>b</b>) nickel bromide, (<b>c</b>) Surf-Bright and (<b>d</b>) both nickel bromide and the Surf-Bright.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>XRD patterns of the nickel–cobalt alloys electrodeposited with a current density at 15 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and the bath containing (<b>a</b>) no additives, (<b>b</b>) nickel bromide, (<b>c</b>) the Surf-Bright and (<b>d</b>) both nickel bromide and the Surf-Bright.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relationships between the current density, average grain size and cobalt content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SIM images of the micro-pillars fabricated from the nickel–cobalt alloys electrodeposited with the bath containing (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) nickel bromide, (<b>e</b>) the Surf-Bright, or (<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>) both nickel bromide and the Surf-Bright, and at a current density of (<b>a</b>,<b>f</b>) 12 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) 15 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, (<b>c</b>) 18 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>) 20 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SEM image of the deformed micro-pillars fabricated from the nickel–cobalt alloys electrodeposited with the bath containing (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) nickel bromide, (<b>e</b>) the Surf-Bright, or (<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>) both nickel bromide and the Surf-Bright, and at a current density of (<b>a</b>,<b>f</b>) 12 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) 15 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, (<b>c</b>) 18 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>) 20 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Engineering stress–strain curves generated from compression of the micro-pillars fabricated from the nickel–cobalt alloys electrodeposited with the bath containing (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) nickel bromide, (<b>e</b>) the Surf-Bright, or (<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>) both nickel bromide and the Surf-Bright, and at a current density of (<b>a</b>,<b>f</b>) 12 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) 15 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, (<b>c</b>) 18 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>) 20 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relationships between the average grain size, micro-hardness and yield strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationships between the composition, micro-hardness and yield strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relationship between the yield strength and the Tabor factor.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 12734 KiB  
Article
Development of the Concurrent Multiscale Discrete-Continuum Model and Its Application in Plasticity Size Effect
by Zhenting Zhang, Zhen Tong and Xiangqian Jiang
Crystals 2022, 12(3), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12030329 - 26 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2772
Abstract
A concurrent multiscale model coupling discrete dislocation dynamics to the finite element method is developed to investigate the plastic mechanism of materials at micron/submicron length scales. In this model, the plastic strain is computed in discrete dislocation dynamics (DDD) and transferred to the [...] Read more.
A concurrent multiscale model coupling discrete dislocation dynamics to the finite element method is developed to investigate the plastic mechanism of materials at micron/submicron length scales. In this model, the plastic strain is computed in discrete dislocation dynamics (DDD) and transferred to the finite element method (FEM) to participate in the constitutive law calculation, while the FEM solves the complex boundary problem for DDD simulation. The implementation of the whole coupling scheme takes advantage of user subroutines in the software ABAQUS. The data structures used for information transferring are introduced in detail. Moreover, a FE mesh-based regularization method is proposed to localize the discrete plastic strain to continuum material points. Uniaxial compression tests of single crystal micropillars are performed to validate the developed model. The results indicate the apparent dependence of yield stress on sample size, and its underlying mechanisms are also analyzed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Crystal Plasticity in Forming Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the coupling scheme of DCM (Yellow block represents the single element in FEM module.).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of distributing plastic strain to integration points of the FEM. The black points represent integration points. The red areas and the shaded areas are the core domains and secondary domains, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The numbering of integration points and nodes in 2D quadrilateral parent elements: (<b>a</b>) 4-node element, (<b>b</b>) 4-node reduced integration element, (<b>c</b>) 8-node element, and (<b>d</b>) 8-node reduced integration element. The dashed lines divide the element into integration point domains. The red dot and black cross represent the node and integration point, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of two-dimensional coordinate system conversion. (<b>a</b>) (<span class="html-italic">x</span>, <span class="html-italic">y</span>) and (<span class="html-italic">x</span>′, <span class="html-italic">y</span>′) represent the position of point A in the coordinate system OXY and O′X′Y′, respectively. (<b>b</b>) The transformation matrix R can be obtained from the relationship of two coordinate systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The workflow of the multiscale framework coupling FEM and DCM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The storage format of arrays in Fortran (<b>a</b>), and the plastic strain tensor re-written into the vector to store in an array (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The data structure of plastic strain tensor at the integration points of all elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The data structures of dislocations (<b>a</b>), obstacles (<b>b</b>), and dislocation sources (<b>c</b>), and the relative user subroutines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sketch of micropillar compression. The black T-signs represent dislocations. The red triangle and green circle represent obstacle and source, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Stress–strain curves of micropillars with different widths <span class="html-italic">L</span> = {0.3, 0.5, 0.8,1.0} µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The yield stress at 0.2% plastic strain offsets, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mrow> <mn>0.2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>a</b>) and average secant hardening modulus, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) versus the width of micropillars. The inset in (<b>a</b>) shows the capture of the yield stress from the one stress–strain curve, and the inset in (<b>b</b>) is the ratio of surface area to volume for each micropillar.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop