[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (66)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ice jam

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
6 pages, 781 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Development of Hydrogel-Type Jam with Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) Mucilage, Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), and Cushuro (Nostoc sphaericum)
by Ignacio A. Albujar and Stefano Málaga
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 37(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024037025 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 119
Abstract
In Peru, overweight and obesity affect 20–38% of adults, increasing the risk of NCDs (type 2 diabetes, heart diseases, and others) that emphasize the need for healthy foods. Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seeds contain high amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acid essentials (omega-3) [...] Read more.
In Peru, overweight and obesity affect 20–38% of adults, increasing the risk of NCDs (type 2 diabetes, heart diseases, and others) that emphasize the need for healthy foods. Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seeds contain high amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acid essentials (omega-3) (17–23%), antioxidants, proteins, and minerals that prevent NCDs. Chia grows in the regions of Arequipa and Puno–Peru, with 4098 tn of production in 2023. Chia mucilage is a soluble fiber with a high water-holding capacity that possesses the techno-functional properties that would improve the properties of gelification and emulsification of foods: jams, ice cream, yogurt, and others. Peru holds the N°1 position in the ranking of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) exporters. This berry contains antioxidants and flavonoids. Cushuro (Nostoc sphaericum) is a gelatinous spherical blue-green alga; it grows over 3000 masl on the Peruvian highland, and it contains good protein and polysaccharide contents. The work aimed to develop a hydrogel-type jam with chia mucilage (0.05–1.00%), blueberries (36–40%), and fresh cushuro (54–60%), compared with a control sample containing pectin and sugar. The characterization of the hydrogel-type jam was moisture (79.53 ± 1.51%), ash (0.20 ± 0.01%), protein (1.02 ± 0.28%), total carbohydrates (19.05 ± 1.76%), fat (0.21 ± 0.03%), antioxidants (318.56 ± 61.5 µm Trolox/g), and phenolic content (2.43 ± 0.93 mg GAE/g). Then, after 30 days of storage, the °Brix (9.9 ± 0.3), viscosity (3921.62 ± 1373.19), pH (3.18 ± 0.02), and water activity (0.82 ± 0.5) values of the hydrogel type-jam complied with the Peruvian applicable legislation (NTP 203.047) and health law (No. 30021). The hydrogel’s functional properties could help reduce the percentage of NCD, promoting the food industry with healthy products. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of VI International Congress la ValSe-Food)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Shelf life of hydrogel-type jam (HJ 3) with chia mucilage, blueberries and cushuro. Effects of storage periods on pH (<b>A</b>), °Brix (<b>B</b>), water activity (<b>C</b>), and viscosity (<b>D</b>) from hydro-gel-type jam (HJ).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 6728 KiB  
Article
Ice-Jam Flooding of the Peace–Athabasca Delta, Canada: Insights from Recent Notable Spring Breakup Events and Implications for Strategic Flow Releases from Upstream Dams
by Spyros Beltaos
Geosciences 2024, 14(12), 335; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14120335 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 421
Abstract
Ice jamming is the primary mechanism that can generate overland flooding and recharge the isolated basins of the Peace–Athabasca Delta (PAD), a valuable ecosystem of international importance and the ancient homeland of the Indigenous Peoples of the region. Focusing on the regulated Peace [...] Read more.
Ice jamming is the primary mechanism that can generate overland flooding and recharge the isolated basins of the Peace–Athabasca Delta (PAD), a valuable ecosystem of international importance and the ancient homeland of the Indigenous Peoples of the region. Focusing on the regulated Peace River and the Peace Sector of the delta, which has been experiencing a drying trend in between rare ice-jam floods over the last ~50 years, this study describes recent notable breakup events, associated observational data, and numerical applications to determine river discharge during the breakup events. Synthesis and interpretation of this material provide a new physical understanding that can inform the ongoing development of a protocol for strategic flow releases toward enhancing basin recharge in years when major ice jams are likely to form near the PAD. Additionally, several recommendations are made for future monitoring activities and improvements in proposed antecedent criteria for early identification of “promising” breakup events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrogeology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Plan view of the lower Peace River and Peace Sector of the Peace–Athabasca Delta. Common ice jam lodgment sites (or “toes”) are shown in the upper portion of the figure. Also shown are sites of Water Survey of Canada hydrometric gauges, of which the records have been used in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Plan view of Peace River and Peace–Athabasca Delta (showing only the northern portion of the Athabasca River). The river distance from the W.A.C. Bennett dam is marked at 100 km intervals. The Slave River begins at the MOP and flows in a generally northward direction (from [<a href="#B2-geosciences-14-00335" class="html-bibr">2</a>], with changes).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overview of the extent of 2014 flooding discernible during aerial monitoring in Wood Buffalo National Park. Adapted from [<a href="#B26-geosciences-14-00335" class="html-bibr">26</a>] with permission from Parks Canada.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Views of the western end of Lake Athabasca on April 20 (<b>left</b>) and 25 (<b>right</b>), 2018, showing the development of an open lead and early melt-out in the upper reach of RdR (triple channel). See image attribution at <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright</a>—accessed 12 August 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sequence of images from 1 May 2018 mobilization and run of the ice cover at PP. Time sequence: 2024 h (stationary ice), 2027 h, 2033 h, 2040 h, 2047 h, and 2120 h. Photo times can also be seen by zooming in to the upper left corner of each image. Flow direction: right to left.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic illustration of spatiotemporal variations in ice conditions in the lower Peace River during the 2018 pre-breakup and breakup seasons, as revealed by time-lapse cameras. Conditions during darkness (~2200 h to 0400 h) are estimated. The “ice run” icon does not differentiate between sheet ice and rubble, which typically follows moving ice sheets. The partial jam in the Slave River formed over a large eddy area near the right bank, but rubble kept moving farther out and closer to the left bank.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Water level variation in the lower Peace and upper Slave Rivers, as captured by five pressure loggers and WSC gauges. The RdR logger was placed next to the WSC gauge on Rivière des Rochers, located ~600 m upstream from the MOP. The L. Athabasca stages are from the gauge at Fort Chipewyan. The flat logger segments signify that the logger was still above water and merely indicating its own elevation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation in PP discharge in early 2018 May, as estimated by different approaches. The WSC data points represent daily mean values and are plotted at noon each day. The local ice cover moved out in late 1 May, though backwater effects likely persisted during the following days. The blue arrow marks the last day with ice-related backwater, as assessed by the WSC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean November discharge at Hudson’s Hope and below Peace Canyon Dam, 1960 to 2023. The Hudson’s Hope WSC gauge operation was discontinued in August 2019. The Canyon Dam data points were derived from BC Hydro’s Station 001 daily flows and can be downloaded from <a href="https://rivers.alberta.ca/" target="_blank">https://rivers.alberta.ca/</a>—accessed 1 December 2024. Neither station was affected by ice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variation in snow on the ground and mean air temperature at the Grand Prairie met station No. 3072921. Note that the snow depletion is coincident with mild weather spells in January and February; 7.1 mm of rain was recorded on 17 January, when the minimum/maximum temperatures amounted to −20/+0.4 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The appearance of highly deteriorated ice cover at the upstream end of Moose Island shortly before final breakup: 30 April 2018 (<b>left</b>, ice moved out later that day or in early 1 May); 4 May 2020 (<b>middle</b>, ice moved out on 5 May); and 4 May 2022 (<b>right</b>, ice moved out on 5 May). The Sentinel images have been enhanced using the B04 band. A similarly mottled ice surface appears on several 5 May photos at this and other sites within the PAD reach [<a href="#B24-geosciences-14-00335" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. See satellite image attribution at <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright</a>—accessed 12 August 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variation in water level at the PP gauge (No. 07KC001) during the passage of javes on 5 May 2022. Unpublished WSC data, provided on request.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>End-of-winter ice thickness at PP versus Fort Chipewyan degree-days of frost, 1959–2022. Based on raw WSC data and assessed according to the procedure described in [<a href="#B22-geosciences-14-00335" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. Regulation commenced in 1968, and the reservoir was full in 1971.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Time series of Fort Chipewyan DDF and PP HF (CGVD28), 1959–2022. The regulation commenced in 1968, and the reservoir was full in 1971. The red square markers indicate LIJFs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Average celerity of breakup front (CB) between ~Sunny Valley and ~MOP, plotted versus freezeup level at PP (<b>a</b>) and versus FC-DDF (<b>b</b>), for all years for which relevant data are available (promising events: 1996, 1997, 2003, 2007, 2014, 2018, 2020; unpromising events: 2004, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021). Red square markers identify LIJFs. From [<a href="#B19-geosciences-14-00335" class="html-bibr">19</a>], with changes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Maximum daily mean breakup discharge at PP plotted versus Fort Chipewyan degree-days of Frost (<b>a</b>) and versus Grand Prairie Oct-Apr solid precipitation (<b>b</b>) for the regulation period 1972–2022 (reservoir filling years 1968–1971 are excluded). Pearson correlation coefficient <span class="html-italic">r</span>~0.63 for both graphs.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3613 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Local Scour around Double Piers in Tandem Arrangement in an S-Shaped Channel under Ice-Jammed Flow Conditions
by Shihao Dong, Zhenhua Zhang, Zhicong Li, Pangpang Chen, Jun Wang and Guowei Li
Water 2024, 16(19), 2831; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192831 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 677
Abstract
The stability of bridge foundations is affected by local scour, and the formation of ice jams exacerbates local scour around bridge piers. These processes, particularly the evolution of ice jams and local scour around piers, are more complex in curved sections than in [...] Read more.
The stability of bridge foundations is affected by local scour, and the formation of ice jams exacerbates local scour around bridge piers. These processes, particularly the evolution of ice jams and local scour around piers, are more complex in curved sections than in straight sections. This study, based on experiments in an S-shaped channel, investigates how various factors—the flow Froude number, ice–water discharge rate, median particle diameter, pier spacing, and pier diameter—affect the maximum local scour depth around double piers in tandem and the distribution of ice jam thickness. The results indicate that under ice-jammed flow conditions, the maximum local scour depth around double piers in tandem is positively correlated with the ice–water discharge rate, pier spacing, and pier diameter and negatively correlated with median particle diameter. The maximum local scour depth is positively correlated with the flow Froude number when it ranges from 0.1 to 0.114, peaking at 0.114. Above this value, the correlation becomes negative. In curved channels, the arrangement of double piers in tandem substantially influences ice jam thickness distribution, with increases in pier diameter and spacing directly correlating with greater ice jam thickness at each cross-section. Furthermore, ice jam thickness is responsive to flow conditions, escalating with higher ice–water discharge rates and decreasing flow Froude numbers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cold Region Hydrology and Hydraulics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution curve of sediment particles in the bed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simulation of (<b>a</b>) ice cover and (<b>b</b>) ice particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The layout of the experiment facility: (<b>a</b>) plan view of S-shaped channel (unit: mm); (<b>b</b>) model pier layout (unit: cm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The ice wave crest and trough passing through the pier: (<b>a</b>) ice wave crest; (<b>b</b>) ice wave trough.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in scour depth and average ice jam thickness with time (Serial Numbers: 2, 18, and 23): (<b>a</b>) open flow condition; (<b>b</b>) ice-covered flow condition; (<b>c</b>) ice-jammed flow condition. (<span class="html-italic">Q<sub>i</sub></span> is the ice-water discharge rate, <span class="html-italic">H</span><sub>0</sub> is the approach flow depth, <span class="html-italic">L</span> is the pier spacing, <span class="html-italic">D</span> is the pier diameter, <span class="html-italic">d</span><sub>50</sub> is the median particle diameter).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vertical velocity distribution in the upstream side of the double piers in tandem arrangement: (<b>a</b>) front pier; (<b>b</b>) rear pier. (<span class="html-italic">V</span><sub>0</sub> <b>is the approach flow velocity</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Influence of different flow Froude numbers on maximum local scour depth (Serial Numbers: 12–16 and 20–22): (<b>a</b>) open flow condition [<a href="#B43-water-16-02831" class="html-bibr">43</a>]; (<b>b</b>) ice-covered flow condition; (<b>c</b>) ice-jammed flow condition; (<b>d</b>) ice jam thickness distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The maximum local scour depth and ice jam thickness under different ice–water discharge rates (Serial Numbers: 5–8): (<b>a</b>) local scour depth; (<b>b</b>) ice jam thickness distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The maximum local scour depth and ice jam thickness under different pier spacings (Serial Numbers: 9–11): (<b>a</b>) local scour depth; (<b>b</b>) ice jam thickness distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Vertical velocity distribution in front of double piers in tandem arrangement (Serial Numbers: 9–11 and 17): (<b>a</b>) front pier; (<b>b</b>) rear pier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The maximum local scouring depth and ice jam thickness distribution under different pier diameters (Serial Numbers: 3–5): (<b>a</b>) local scour depth; (<b>b</b>) ice jam thickness distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of maximum local scour depth around piers under ice-covered flow condition and ice-jammed flow condition (Serial Numbers: 1, 2, 5, and 18–20): (<b>a</b>) front pier, (<b>b</b>) rear pier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Relationship between regression-predicted and measured scour depth of tandem double piers: (<b>a</b>) front pier; (<b>b</b>) rear pier.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 16666 KiB  
Review
Requirements for the Development and Operation of a Freeze-Up Ice-Jam Flood Forecasting System
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Robert Briggs, Amir Ali Khan and Thomas Puestow
Water 2024, 16(18), 2648; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182648 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 822
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive overview of ice-jam flood forecasting methodologies applicable to rivers during freezing. It emphasizes the importance of understanding river ice processes and fluvial geomorphology for developing a freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting system. The article showcases a stochastic modelling approach, [...] Read more.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of ice-jam flood forecasting methodologies applicable to rivers during freezing. It emphasizes the importance of understanding river ice processes and fluvial geomorphology for developing a freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting system. The article showcases a stochastic modelling approach, which involves simulating a deterministic river ice model multiple times with varying parameters and boundary conditions. This approach has been applied to the Exploits River at Badger in Newfoundland, Canada, a river that has experienced several freeze-up ice-jam floods. The forecasting involves two approaches: predicting the extent of the ice cover during river freezing and using an ensemble method to determine backwater flood level elevations. Other examples of current ice-jam flood forecasting systems for the Kokemäenjoki River (Pori, Finland), Saint John River (Edmundston, NB, Canada), and Churchill River (Mud Lake, NL, Canada) that are operational are also presented. The text provides a detailed explanation of the processes involved in river freeze-up and ice-jam formation, as well as the methodologies used for freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting. Ice-jam flood forecasting systems used for freeze-up were compared to those employed for spring breakup. Spring breakup and freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting systems differ in their driving factors and methodologies. Spring breakup, driven by snowmelt runoff, typically relies on deterministic and probabilistic approaches to predict peak flows. Freeze-up, driven by cold temperatures, focuses on the complex interactions between atmospheric conditions, river flow, and ice dynamics. Both systems require air temperature forecasts, but snowpack data are more crucial for spring breakup forecasting. To account for uncertainty, both approaches may employ ensemble forecasting techniques, generating multiple forecasts using slightly different initial conditions or model parameters. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art in ice-jam flood forecasting systems and to identify gaps and areas for improvement in existing ice-jam flood forecasting approaches, with a focus on enhancing their accuracy, reliability, and decision-making potential. In conclusion, an effective freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting system requires real-time data collection and analysis, historical data analysis, ice jam modeling, user interface design, alert systems, and integration with other relevant systems. This combination allows operators to better understand ice jam behavior and make informed decisions about potential risks or mitigation measures to protect people and property along rivers. The key findings of this review are as follows: (i) Ice-jam flood forecasting systems are often based on simple, empirical models that rely heavily on historical data and limited real-time monitoring information. (ii) There is a need for more sophisticated modeling techniques that can better capture the complex interactions between ice cover, water levels, and channel geometry. (iii) Combining data from multiple sources such as satellite imagery, ground-based sensors, numerical models, and machine learning algorithms can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of ice-jam flood forecasts. (iv) Effective decision-support tools are crucial for integrating ice-jam flood forecasts into emergency response and mitigation strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Longitudinal profiles of water temperature, ice cover width and extent and water levels along the Kokemäenjoki River in Finland (from [<a href="#B19-water-16-02648" class="html-bibr">19</a>]; used with permission).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An ensemble of backwater level profiles from the stochastic model framework [<a href="#B21-water-16-02648" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Ice affected water level hydrograph forecasted on 5 December 2023, an example for the location at gauge 03PC001 (Churchill River at English Point). The 1:20 AEP, 1:100 AEP, 2012 highwater mark, and 2017 highwater mark are all ice-affected flood reference levels. Left bank, right bank, and low bank points are also included for reference. The observed water level elevations fluctuate within the 10th and 90th percentile bounds of the forecasted ice-jam flood forecasted elevations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Processes of ice cover formation during river freezing (adapted from [<a href="#B25-water-16-02648" class="html-bibr">25</a>]; used with permission under ASCE license 1120756-2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monte Carlo analysis framework setup and calibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Monte Carlo analysis framework for ice-jam flood forecasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Upper and lower subbasins of the Exploits River catchment with the reach of the lower subbasin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Average daily mean (within a band of ±standard deviations) flows from the Millertown Dam and at Badger (from 2010 to 2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Longitudinal profile of the Exploits River thalweg between the Millertown and Goodyear dams for an open-water calibration (adapted from [<a href="#B7-water-16-02648" class="html-bibr">7</a>]; solid-line box—inset bounds for Figure 11; dashed-line box—inset bounds for Figures 13 and 14.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Badger Rough Waters along the Exploits River in July 2023 (photo by Dwanda Newman).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Longitudinal profile of the consolidated ice cover simulated upstream from Charlie Edwards Point to Badger.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>Top panel</b>): Sentinel-1 image acquired 2 February 2019 (data from European Space Agency); (<b>bottom panel</b>): C-Core’s ice classification of the top image (from <a href="https://www.exploitsriver.app/" target="_blank">https://www.exploitsriver.app/</a>; accessed on 10 September 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>Top panel</b>): distribution of the boundary conditions of discharge <span class="html-italic">Q</span>, volume of ice <span class="html-italic">V<sub>ice</sub></span>, downstream water level elevations <span class="html-italic">W,</span> and ice-jam toe location <span class="html-italic">x</span>; (<b>bottom panel</b>): ensemble of longitudinal profiles of backwater level elevations, whose distribution is summarized using percentile profiles corresponding to 1:100, 1:200, and 1:500 AEP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>Top panel</b>): constrained distributions of flow <span class="html-italic">Q</span>, volume of ice <span class="html-italic">V<sub>ice</sub></span>, and downstream water level elevations <span class="html-italic">W</span>; (<b>bottom panel</b>): ensemble of longitudinal profiles of backwater level elevations summarized using 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Structure of the framework to forecast ice cover extent and backwater levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Water level elevations attained at Badger as a function of the volume of ice produced upstream of Badger during freezing (data from Fenco [<a href="#B26-water-16-02648" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-water-16-02648" class="html-bibr">27</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6775 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of a Coupled CFD and Multi-Body Motion Model for Ice-Structure Interaction Simulation
by Hanif Pourshahbaz, Tadros Ghobrial and Ahmad Shakibaeinia
Water 2024, 16(17), 2454; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172454 - 29 Aug 2024
Viewed by 943
Abstract
The interaction of water flow, ice, and structures is common in fluvial ice processes, particularly around Ice Control Structures (ICSs) that are used to manage and prevent ice jam floods. To evaluate the effectiveness of ICSs, it is essential to understand the complex [...] Read more.
The interaction of water flow, ice, and structures is common in fluvial ice processes, particularly around Ice Control Structures (ICSs) that are used to manage and prevent ice jam floods. To evaluate the effectiveness of ICSs, it is essential to understand the complex interaction between water flow, ice and the structure. Numerical modeling is a valuable tool that can facilitate such understanding. Until now, classical Eulerian mesh-based methods have not been evaluated for the simulation of ice interaction with ICS. In this paper we evaluate the capability, accuracy, and efficiency of a coupled Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) and multi-body motion numerical model, based on the mesh-based FLOW-3D V.2023 R1 software for simulation of ice-structure interactions in several benchmark cases. The model’s performance was compared with results from meshless-based models (performed by others) for the same laboratory test cases that were used as a reference for the comparison. To this end, simulation results from a range of dam break laboratory experiments were analyzed, encompassing varying numbers of floating objects with distinct characteristics, both in the presence and absence of ICS, and under different downstream water levels. The results show that the overall accuracy of the FLOW-3D model under various experimental conditions resulted in a RMSE of 0.0534 as opposed to an overall RMSE of 0.0599 for the meshless methods. Instabilities were observed in the FLOW-3D model for more complex phenomena that involve open boundaries and a larger number of blocks. Although the FLOW-3D model exhibited a similar computational time to the GPU-accelerated meshless-based models, constraints on the processors speed and the number of cores available for use by the processors could limit the computational time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cold Region Hydrology and Hydraulics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of the TC, and arrangement of blocks with (<b>b</b>) TC4, (<b>c</b>) TC9, and (<b>d</b>) TC25. <span class="html-italic">H<sub>do</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">H<sub>up</sub></span> show downstream and upstream water depth, <span class="html-italic">L<sub>do</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">L<sub>up</sub></span> indicate water length downstream and upstream of the gate, and <span class="html-italic">W</span> displays the width of the tank. Note that TC4 and TC9 did not have ICS downstream of the gate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Snapshots of the TC4-2.5 at time intervals of (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.4 s, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.8 s, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.2 s, (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.6 s, (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 2.0 s, and (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 2.4 s. Each subfigure comprises three images: the top is the laboratory TC result, the middle is TC4-N by Amaro et al. [<a href="#B31-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">31</a>], and the bottom image illustrates the results from the current numerical model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Snapshots of the TC9-2.5 at time intervals of (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.4 s, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.8 s, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.2 s, (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.6 s, (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 2.0 s, and (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 2.4 s. Each subfigure comprises three images: the top is the laboratory TC result, the middle is TC9-N by Amaro et al. [<a href="#B31-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">31</a>], and the bottom image illustrates the results from the current numerical model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Snapshots of the TC25-PP at time intervals of (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.3 s, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.6 s, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.9 s, (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.2 s, (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.5 s, and (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 2.0 s. Each subfigure comprises three images: the top is the laboratory TC result, the middle is TC25-N by Billy et al. [<a href="#B33-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">33</a>], and the bottom image illustrates the results from the current numerical model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Snapshots of the TC25-I at time intervals of (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.3 s, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.6 s, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 0.9 s, (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.2 s, (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 1.5 s, and (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">t</span> = 2.0 s. Each subfigure comprises three images: the top is the laboratory TC result, the middle is TC25-N by Billy et al. [<a href="#B33-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">33</a>], and the bottom image illustrates the results from the current numerical model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the trajectory of the blocks from the laboratory experiment TC4-2.5 (different lines refer to the results of the different repetitions of the experiments TC4-2.5-R1, TC4-2.5-R2, and TC4-2.5-R3) with TC4-N from Amaro et al. [<a href="#B31-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and the current numerical model for the x-direction of (<b>a</b>) block B1 and (<b>b</b>) block B2 and along the z-direction for (<b>c</b>) block B1 and (<b>d</b>) block B2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of the trajectory of the blocks from the laboratory experiment TC9-2.5 (different lines refer to the results of the different repetitions of the experiments TC9-2.5-R1, TC9-2.5-R2, and TC9-2.5-R3) with TC9-N from Amaro et al. [<a href="#B31-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and the current numerical model for the x-direction of (<b>a</b>) block C1, (<b>b</b>) block C2 and (<b>c</b>) block C3, and along the z-direction for (<b>d</b>) block C1, (<b>e</b>) block C2 and (<b>f</b>) block C3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><span class="html-italic">RMSE</span> for numerical simulation results in the x and z directions comparing the accuracy of the current model with TC4-N and TC9-N for (<b>a</b>) TC4, and (<b>b</b>) TC9, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the trajectory of the blocks from the laboratory experiment TC25-PP (different lines refer to the results of the different repetitions of the experiments TC25-PP-R1, TC25-PP-R2, and TC25-PP-R3) with TC25-N from Billy et al. [<a href="#B33-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">33</a>] and the current numerical model for the x-direction of (<b>a</b>) block C6 and (<b>b</b>) block C12, and along the z-direction for (<b>c</b>) block C21 and (<b>d</b>) block C22.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of the trajectory of the blocks from the laboratory experiment TC25-I (different lines refer to the results of the different repetitions of the experiments TC25-I-R1, and TC25-I-R2) with TC25-N from Billy et al. [<a href="#B33-water-16-02454" class="html-bibr">33</a>] and the current numerical model for the x-direction of (<b>a</b>) block C6 and (<b>b</b>) block C12, and along the z-direction for (<b>c</b>) block C21 and (<b>d</b>) block C22.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p><span class="html-italic">RMSE</span> for numerical simulation results in the x and z directions comparing the accuracy of the current model with TC25-N for the TC25 experiments for polypropylene (PP) and ice (I) blocks.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 15343 KiB  
Article
River Ice Mapping from Landsat-8 OLI Top of Atmosphere Reflectance Data by Addressing Atmospheric Influences with Random Forest: A Case Study on the Han River in South Korea
by Hyangsun Han, Taewook Kim and Seohyeon Kim
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3187; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173187 - 29 Aug 2024
Viewed by 695
Abstract
Accurate river ice mapping is crucial for predicting and managing floods caused by ice jams and for the safe operation of hydropower and water resource facilities. Although satellite multispectral images are widely used for river ice mapping, atmospheric contamination limits their effectiveness. This [...] Read more.
Accurate river ice mapping is crucial for predicting and managing floods caused by ice jams and for the safe operation of hydropower and water resource facilities. Although satellite multispectral images are widely used for river ice mapping, atmospheric contamination limits their effectiveness. This study developed river ice mapping models for the Han River in South Korea using atmospherically uncorrected Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) multispectral reflectance data, addressing atmospheric influences with a Random Forest (RF) classification approach. The RF-based river ice mapping models were developed by implementing various combinations of input variables, incorporating the Landsat-8 multispectral top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance, normalized difference indices for snow, water, and bare ice, and atmospheric factors such as aerosol optical depth, water vapor content, and ozone concentration from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer observations, as well as surface elevation from the GLO-30 digital elevation model. The RF model developed using all variables achieved excellent performance in the classification of snow-covered ice, snow-free ice, and water, with an overall accuracy and kappa coefficient exceeding 98.4% and 0.98 for test samples, and higher than 83.7% and 0.75 when compared against reference river ice maps generated by manually interpreting the Landsat-8 images under various atmospheric conditions. The RF-based river ice mapping model for the atmospherically corrected Landsat-8 multispectral surface reflectance was also developed, but it showed very low performance under atmospheric conditions heavily contaminated by aerosol and water vapor. Aerosol optical depth and water vapor content were identified as the most important variables. This study demonstrates that multispectral reflectance data, despite atmospheric contamination, can be effectively used for river ice monitoring by applying machine learning with atmospheric auxiliary data to mitigate atmospheric effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Topography of the Han River region in South Korea. The green and yellow rectangles on the left topographic map represent the imaging coverage of Landsat-8 path/row 115/34 and 116/34, respectively. The yellow rectangle on the right map indicates the region of Paldang Lake, which serves as the test site for the river ice mapping models proposed in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An example of manual extraction of samples for snow-covered ice, snow-free ice, and water-based on visual investigation of the Landsat-8 RGB true color composite image at the path/row 116/34, obtained on 1 January 2018. The image area corresponds to the yellow box on the right image in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03187-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>, and the red lines indicate the water boundary.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Accuracy evaluation metrics of the RF-based river ice mapping model developed using different variable selection schemes for the test samples from the Landast-8 OLI dataset on (<b>a</b>) 28 January 2022 (medium WV and low AOD), (<b>b</b>) 24 February 2017 (high WV and low ADO), and (<b>c</b>) 15 February 2017 (high WV and high AOD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI RGB true-color composite image on 28 January 2022 (low AOD conditions, medium WV content) and the corresponding river ice map generated by (<b>b</b>) manual interpretation and (<b>c</b>–<b>h</b>) the RF models based on variable selection schemes 1 to 6 around the Paldang Lake. (<b>i</b>) Accuracy assessment metrics of the RF model-derived river ice maps calculated based on (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI RGB true-color composite image on 24 February 2017 (low AOD conditions, high WV content) and the corresponding river ice map generated by (<b>b</b>) manual interpretation and (<b>c</b>–<b>h</b>) the RF models based on variable selection schemes 1 to 6 around the Paldang Lake. (<b>i</b>) Accuracy assessment metrics of the RF model-derived river ice maps calculated based on (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI RGB true-color composite image on 15 February 2017 (high AOD conditions, high WV content) and the corresponding river ice map generated by (<b>b</b>) manual interpretation and (<b>c</b>–<b>h</b>) the RF models based on variable selection schemes 1 to 6 around the Paldang Lake. (<b>i</b>) Accuracy assessment metrics of the RF model-derived river ice maps calculated based on (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI RGB true-color composite image on 28 January 2022 and (<b>b</b>) the corresponding river ice map generated by the RF model based on variable selection scheme 5. Red polygons in (<b>a</b>) represent the streams of the Han River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI RGB true-color composite image on 24 February 2017 and (<b>b</b>) the corresponding river ice map generated by the RF model based on variable selection scheme 5. The red polygons in (<b>a</b>) represent the streams of the Han River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI RGB true-color composite image on 15 February 2017 and (<b>b</b>) the corresponding river ice map generated by the RF model based on variable selection scheme 5. The red polygons in (<b>a</b>) represent the streams of the Han River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sentinel-2 MSI RGB true-color composite image on 12 February 2017 around the Paldang Lake and (<b>b</b>) the corresponding river ice map generated by manual interpretation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Mean decrease in accuracy of the RF-based river ice mapping model using the input variable selection scheme 5.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 5426 KiB  
Article
Simulation Analysis of Three-Point Bending Fracture Process of Yellow River Ice
by Yu Deng, Juan Wang, Yuhan Meng and Yong Zhu
Crystals 2024, 14(8), 729; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14080729 - 17 Aug 2024
Viewed by 673
Abstract
During the ice flood period of the Yellow River, the fracture and destruction of river ice can easily lead to the formation of ice jams and ice dams in the curved and narrow reaches. However, the occurrence and development mechanism of river ice [...] Read more.
During the ice flood period of the Yellow River, the fracture and destruction of river ice can easily lead to the formation of ice jams and ice dams in the curved and narrow reaches. However, the occurrence and development mechanism of river ice fracture remain incompletely understood in the Yellow River. Therefore, based on the three-point bending physical test of the Yellow River ice, a three-point bending fracture numerical model of the Yellow River ice was constructed. The fracture failure process of the Yellow River ice under three-point bending was simulated, and the effects of the crack-to-height ratio and ice grain size on the fracture properties of the river ice were analyzed. By comparing the results with those of physical tests on river ice, it is evident that the fracture model can effectively simulate the cracking process of river ice. Within the confines of the simulated sample size spectrum, as the crack-to-height ratio varies from 0.2 to 0.8, the fracture toughness value of the Yellow River ice spans a range from 115.01 to 143.37 KPa·m1/2. Correspondingly, within the simulated calculation values ranging from 5.38 mm to 24.07 mm for ice crystal size, the fracture toughness value of the Yellow River ice exhibits a range from 116.89 to 143.37 KPa·m1/2. The findings reveal that an increase in the crack-to-depth ratio leads to a decrement in the fracture toughness of river ice. Within the scale range encompassed by the model calculations, as the average size of the ice crystal grains augments, the fracture toughness of the river ice exhibits a gradual ascending trend. The research results provide a parameter basis for studying the fracture performance of the Yellow River ice using a numerical simulation method and lays a foundation for investigating the cracking process of river ice from macro and micro multi-scales. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microstructure and Mechanical Behaviour of Structural Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure distribution figure of Yellow River ice grains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic figure of the finite element model of Yellow River ice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of the cracking process and physical experiment failure modes of river ice under three-point bending load: (<b>a</b>) initial crack initiation; (<b>b</b>) development of the macroscopic main crack; (<b>c</b>) final failure mode; (<b>d</b>) physical experimental failure mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Impact of initial defects on the failure mode of river ice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three-point bending beam model figure of river ice with different ice crystal grain distributions: (<b>a</b>) average grain size <span class="html-italic">d<sub>av</sub></span> = 4.8 mm; (<b>b</b>) average grain size <span class="html-italic">d<sub>av</sub></span> = 7.2 mm; (<b>c</b>) average grain size <span class="html-italic">d<sub>av</sub></span> = 10.6 mm; (<b>d</b>) average grain size <span class="html-italic">d<sub>av</sub></span> = 13 mm; (<b>e</b>) average grain size <span class="html-italic">d<sub>av</sub></span> = 24 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of simulated and experimental values of three-point bending fracture toughness of river ice with different ice crystal sizes.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1302 KiB  
Article
Antiglycation Effect of Jabuticaba (Plinia cauliflora) and Its Potential Role in Delaying Cataract Formation in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats
by Arif Yanuar Ridwan, Yuki Shimozu, Nikesh Narang, Takashi Kometani, Yusuke Yamashita and Young-Il Kim
Nutraceuticals 2024, 4(3), 363-372; https://doi.org/10.3390/nutraceuticals4030021 - 3 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1072
Abstract
Jabuticaba fruit (Plinia cauliflora) is widely consumed in various forms such as juice, jam, wine, and liquors; however, its potential therapeutic effects on diabetic complications remain inadequately explored. We aimed to investigate the potential antiglycation activity of Jabuticaba, identify the active [...] Read more.
Jabuticaba fruit (Plinia cauliflora) is widely consumed in various forms such as juice, jam, wine, and liquors; however, its potential therapeutic effects on diabetic complications remain inadequately explored. We aimed to investigate the potential antiglycation activity of Jabuticaba, identify the active compounds through bioassay-guided fractionation, and assess its effects on cataract formation in a Streptozotocin-induced diabetic type 1 rat model. Through bioassay-guided fractionation, we identified gallic acid (IC50: 24.7 µg/mL), protocatechuic acid (IC50: 1.22 µg/mL), and an ellagitannin, Repandinin B (IC50: 0.55 µg/mL), as active compounds contributing to antiglycation effects. In the animal study, the addition of Jabuticaba juice extract to the drinking water at a concentration of 0.5% (w/v) for 12 weeks demonstrated an amelioration in cataract progression. These results suggest that Jabuticaba has high antiglycation effects leading to the delaying of cataract formation in type 1 diabetes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Antiglycation effect of Jabuticaba juice on human serum albumin–glucose glycation model (mean ± SD, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3; the letters represent the results of a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc multiple comparisons).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart of the extraction, fractionation, and purification of antiglycation active compounds from Jabuticaba juice. The active fractions are shown as bold. The percentages in parentheses denote the yields.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chemical structure and MS/MS fragmentation of Fraction 5 and Corilagin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evaluation of cataract grade between diabetic control and Jabuticaba juice extract (JJE) groups. (<b>a</b>) Rat lenses were removed from the eyes, and the degree of light backscattering was assessed by placing the lenses on a grid sheet. (<b>b</b>) The cataract prevalence based on grade was compared in each group (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, Wilcoxon sum-rank analysis).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7046 KiB  
Review
Elements and Processes Required for the Development of a Spring-Breakup Ice-Jam Flood Forecasting System (Churchill River, Atlantic Canada)
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Robert Briggs, Amir Ali Khan and Thomas Puestow
Water 2024, 16(11), 1557; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111557 - 29 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 910
Abstract
Spring-breakup ice-jam floods are a major hazard for many rivers in cold regions. They can cause severe damage to infrastructure, property, and ecosystems along riverbanks. To reduce the risk and impact of these events, it is essential to develop reliable and timely forecasting [...] Read more.
Spring-breakup ice-jam floods are a major hazard for many rivers in cold regions. They can cause severe damage to infrastructure, property, and ecosystems along riverbanks. To reduce the risk and impact of these events, it is essential to develop reliable and timely forecasting systems that can provide early warning and guidance for mitigation actions. In this paper, we highlight the elements and processes required for the successful development of a spring-breakup ice-jam flood forecasting system, using the lower Churchill River in Labrador, Canada as a case study. We review the existing forecasting methodologies and systems for spring-breakup ice-jam floods and discuss their strengths and limitations. We then describe the case study of the lower Churchill River, where a large ice-jam flood occurred in May 2017, triggering an independent review and a series of recommendations for improving the flood preparedness and response. We present the main components and features of the forecasting system that was developed for the lower Churchill River, based on the recommendations from the independent review. We also discuss the improvements that were made to the forecasting system, such as parallelization, adaptation, and determination of ice-jam prone areas. Finally, we provide some conclusions and recommendations for future research and development of spring-breakup ice-jam flood forecasting systems, focusing on the requirements for a technical framework that incorporates community engagement and special considerations for regulated rivers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical, tertiary-threshold, ice-jam flood forecasting depiction (from Lindenschmidt [<a href="#B1-water-16-01557" class="html-bibr">1</a>]; permission to disseminate publicly granted by Nalcor).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Setup and calibration of Monte-Carlo framework for multiple model runs yielding an ensemble of longitudinal backwater level profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Ice jam with boundary conditions (<span class="html-italic">Q</span>, <span class="html-italic">V<sub>ice</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">W</span>, and <span class="html-italic">x</span>) and parameters (<span class="html-italic">FT</span>, <span class="html-italic">h</span>, <span class="html-italic">K</span>1, <span class="html-italic">K</span>2, <span class="html-italic">n</span><sub>8</sub>, <span class="html-italic">n<sub>b</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">PC</span>, <span class="html-italic">PS</span>, <span class="html-italic">ST</span>, <span class="html-italic">v<sub>d</sub></span>, and <span class="html-italic">v<sub>e</sub></span>); see text for definitions of each.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Monte-Carlo framework modified for ice-jam flood forecasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Subbasins of the Churchill River catchment area (from Lindenschmidt et al. [<a href="#B27-water-16-01557" class="html-bibr">27</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Churchill River reach of the lower subbasin [<a href="#B27-water-16-01557" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Dashboard of the Churchill River Flood Forecast System for operational ice-jam flood forecasting on 17 April 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sentinel-1 image acquired 5 December 2016 showing the formation of the hanging ice dam, immediately downstream of the Muskrat Falls construction site [<a href="#B31-water-16-01557" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Forecast module of the Churchill River Flood Forecast System for operational ice-jam flood forecasting on 17 April 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cycle of different forecasting states within the CRFFS [<a href="#B34-water-16-01557" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Inundation module of the Churchill River Flood Forecasting System with allowable inundation extent where depths and probabilities can be indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flood exposure hazard module in the Churchill River Flood Forecasting System.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 8376 KiB  
Technical Note
Reach-Based Extrapolation to Assess the Ice-Jam Flood Hazard of an Ungauged River Reach along the Mackenzie River, Canada
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Anna Coles and Jad Saade
Water 2024, 16(11), 1535; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111535 - 27 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1072
Abstract
Many communities along rivers in the Northwest Territories do not have water-level gauges, making flood hazard analyses difficult at these sites. These include the communities of Jean Marie River, Tulita and Fort Good Hope on the Mackenzie River, Nahanni Butte on the Liard [...] Read more.
Many communities along rivers in the Northwest Territories do not have water-level gauges, making flood hazard analyses difficult at these sites. These include the communities of Jean Marie River, Tulita and Fort Good Hope on the Mackenzie River, Nahanni Butte on the Liard River and Fort McPherson on the Peel River. However, gauges do exist at other sites upstream and downstream of these communities, from which flood hazard assessments can be extrapolated to the ungauged communities. Reach-based extrapolation becomes particularly challenging when analysing ice-jam flood hazards since data sparsity is an additional challenge at these locations. A simple empirical approach using non-dimensional stage and discharge was implemented, which allowed only a minimum of the required data from all sites to be extracted. From the gauged sites, water-surface elevations and slopes from digital elevation models, channel widths, thalweg elevations and ice thicknesses from under-ice flow measurement surveys and recorded water levels were obtained. As a test case, results from the gauged reach of Fort Simpson were extrapolated to the ungauged reach of Jean Marie River and are presented in this technical note. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Idealised equilibrium ice jam for a discharge <span class="html-italic">Q</span> showing backwater staging depth <span class="html-italic">H</span>, depth under the ice jam <span class="html-italic">h</span> and ice-jam thickness <span class="html-italic">t</span> (from [<a href="#B4-water-16-01535" class="html-bibr">4</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relationship between dimensionless discharge <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> and dimensionless ice-jam stage <span class="html-italic">η</span> for equilibrium ice jams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Conceptualisation of the Monte Carlo framework for the gauged reach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Conceptualisation of the Monte Carlo framework for the ungauged reach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Gauge location for the Jean Marie River reach along the Mackenzie River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Water-level elevations recorded at Fort Simpson for the 1996–2023 timeframe; the year 2020 is magnified in <a href="#water-16-01535-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a> to provide an example of spring breakup, open-water and freezing peaks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Water-level elevations recorded at Fort Simpson for 2020, zoomed in from <a href="#water-16-01535-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, showing the spring breakup, open-water and freezing peaks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Frequency distributions of flows recorded at the end of spring breakup (flow with last recorded b-flag) at Fort Simpson.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Digital terrain map of the Fort Simpson area along the Mackenzie River; surface water elevations extracted along the line (representing a length of 10 km) within the river segment were graphed, as indicated in the next figure, to calculate slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Surface water elevations along an arc (shown in <a href="#water-16-01535-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>) within the river at Fort Simpson to calculate river slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Histograms of the resulting backwater depths <span class="html-italic">H</span> (<b>Left</b> panel) and maximum ice-jam thicknesses <span class="html-italic">t</span> (<b>Right</b> panel) for Fort Simpson.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Cross-section at the Fort Simpson gauge surveyed on 16 March 2022 for under-ice flow calculations using an ADCP (provided by the Water Survey of Canada).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Calibrated stage frequency curve within the minimum/maximum bounds of the three best-fitted stage frequency distributions of the observed data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Frequency distributions of ice-induced water-level peaks recorded by the Fort Simpson gauge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Frequency distributions of flows recorded at the end of spring breakup (flow with last recorded b-flag) at Strong Point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Digital terrain map of the Jean Marie River along with the Mackenzie River; surface water elevations extracted along the line (representing a length of 3.6 km) within the river segments were graphed, as indicated in the next figure, to calculate slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Surface water elevations along the arc, located in the previous figure, within the river at the Jean Marie River to calculate the river slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Calculated stage frequency distribution at the Jean Marie River.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2185 KiB  
Article
Undescribed Cyclohexene and Benzofuran Alkenyl Derivatives from Choerospondias axillaris, a Potential Hypoglycemic Fruit
by Ermias Tamiru Weldetsadik, Na Li, Jingjuan Li, Jiahuan Shang, Hongtao Zhu and Yingjun Zhang
Foods 2024, 13(10), 1495; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101495 - 11 May 2024
Viewed by 1227
Abstract
The fruit of Choerospondias axillaris (Anacardiaceae), known as south wild jujube in China, has been consumed widely in several regions of the world to produce fruit pastille and leathers, juice, jam, and candy. A comprehensive chemical study on the fresh fruits led to [...] Read more.
The fruit of Choerospondias axillaris (Anacardiaceae), known as south wild jujube in China, has been consumed widely in several regions of the world to produce fruit pastille and leathers, juice, jam, and candy. A comprehensive chemical study on the fresh fruits led to the isolation and identification of 18 compounds, including 7 new (17) and 11 known (818) comprised of 5 alkenyl (cyclohexenols and cyclohexenones) derivatives (15), 3 benzofuran derivatives (68), 6 flavonoids (914) and 4 lignans (1518). Their structures were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic analysis. The known lignans 1518 were isolated from the genus Choerospondias for the first time. Most of the isolates exhibited significant inhibitory activity on α-glucosidase with IC50 values from 2.26 ± 0.06 to 43.9 ± 0.96 μM. Molecular docking experiments strongly supported the potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. The results indicated that C. axillaris fruits could be an excellent source of functional foods that acquire potential hypoglycemic bioactive components. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutraceuticals, Functional Foods, and Novel Foods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Compounds <b>1</b>–<b>18</b> isolated from the fruits of <span class="html-italic">Choerospondias axillaris</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Key HMBC, <sup>1</sup>H-<sup>1</sup>H COSY and ROESY correlations of compounds <b>1</b>–<b>7</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calculated and experimental ECD curves of compounds <b>1</b>–<b>5</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Molecular docking study of compounds binding to <span class="html-italic">α</span>-glucosidase protein. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>): 3D ligand interaction diagram of <b>6</b>, <b>7</b>, <b>8</b> and quercetin with <span class="html-italic">α</span>-glucosidase and a close view of the binding active site with key residues that interacted to ligands (right); (<b>A1</b>–<b>D1</b>): 2D protein–ligand interaction diagram of <b>6</b>, <b>7</b>, <b>8</b>, quercetin and <span class="html-italic">α</span>-glucosidase complex.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 45052 KiB  
Article
Ice-Jam Investigations along the Oder River Based on Satellite and UAV Data
by Fabian Möldner, Bernd Hentschel and Dirk Carstensen
Water 2024, 16(10), 1323; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16101323 - 7 May 2024
Viewed by 1144
Abstract
The Oder River, situated along the border between Poland and Germany, is regularly affected by ice-jam events and their associated hazards, such as a sudden rise in water level and the endangerment to flood-protection infrastructure. The existing databases on past ice-jam events lack [...] Read more.
The Oder River, situated along the border between Poland and Germany, is regularly affected by ice-jam events and their associated hazards, such as a sudden rise in water level and the endangerment to flood-protection infrastructure. The existing databases on past ice-jam events lack substantial information considering ice formation, blockage origins or the spatiotemporal evolution of the ice cover needed for a comprehensive understanding of relevant ice processes. Within this study, the evaluation of satellite and Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) data was carried out in order to analyze the capabilities of enhancing river ice information in the study area. Satellite imagery was proven to be a valuable source of investigating ice-jam phenomena on all scales, leading to the identification of initial ice-jam locations, surveying spatiotemporal ice cover evolution or monitoring the maximum ice-cover extent. A simplified approach for river ice classification of satellite radar data using the K-Means Cluster Analysis is introduced, enabling the differentiation between river ice formations. Based on UAV data taken in this study, workflows were presented, allowing for measurements of ice floe velocities and the localization of flooded and ice-covered flow control structures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Localization of the study area between Germany and Poland. Marking of the Oder River section investigated in the study. (blue line). The entire border river was considered, together with the section flowing in Poland up to Lake Dabie. The green points refer to gauge stations, and the red point refers to the climate station evaluated in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Graphical representation of ice-jam events on the Oder River since 1991. (<b>a</b>) Visualization of the occurrence of consolidated ice cover in the study area (1 = ice cover, 0 = no ice cover, daily temporal resolution; * no data regarding duration in 1995) between 01.01.1991 and 01.01.2023. (<b>b</b>) Maximum extent of ice-jam events. (Sources: RZGW Szczecin, WSA Oder–Havel, IWWN).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hydrograph of three gauge stations (blue, green and black lines), air temperature (red dotted line) and wind direction (black arrows) during the 2021 ice-jam event. The grey area visualizes the timespan of the ice-jam formation. The grey dashed line indicates the beginning of the ice run observed. (Sources: WSA Oder–Havel).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Satellite images of the ice-jam event in the area between Lunow (Poland) and the branch of the West Oder in 2018. (<b>a</b>) Radar satellite image (Sentinel-1, 4th of March), (<b>b</b>) near-infrared enhanced-color image (Sentinel-2) and (<b>c</b>) true-color satellite image (Sentinel-2, 3rd of March).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Preprocessing workflow applied to Sentinel-1 images in the study. Parenthesized steps are optional.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Identical image section of different polarization bands of Sentinel-1 image required on 19 February 19, 2021, at the height of Hohenwutzen (Germany). (<b>a</b>) Sigma0_VV_dB. (<b>b</b>) Sigma0_VH. (<b>c</b>) Virtual “sensitivity” band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) UAV Phantom-4-RTK and (<b>b</b>) UAV image of ice cover on the Oder River in February 2021 near Bielinek (Poland).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Representation of selected processing steps within the PTV workflow. Pink circles represent ground control points. (<b>a</b>) Orthophoto of the investigation area of the Oder River. (<b>b</b>) Processed UAV image with delineation of the area of interest (green frame).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Digital elevation model including Oder River bathymetry (WSA Oder–Havel). (<b>b</b>) LiDAR data with recording of flow control structures (RZGW Szczecin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sentinel-2 image recorded on 3rd of March 2018. (<b>b</b>) Classified Sentinel-1 radar image recorded one day later in the same area. Classes that were associated with ice cover along the river are shown in white, classes associated with a free water surface are shown in blue. The ice-free area is also visible in the radar images (red ellipses).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of UAV images and classified Sentinel-1 grid data. Red rectangles visualize the picture details on the left. (<b>a</b>) Transition of the open water surface (blue values for open water clusters) north of Hohenwutzen Bridge (Germany) towards the consolidated ice cover formed by a juxtaposed formation of pancake ice floes (purple and green cluster values). (<b>b</b>) Loose formation of pancake ice floes (purple cluster value) at the height of Bielinek. (<b>c</b>) Consolidated and tilted ice floe formation at the height of Lunow (yellow cluster value).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sentinel-1 radar image taken on 1st of March 2018 and (<b>b</b>) Sentinel-2 image taken on 3rd of March 2018 of the initial ice-jam location near Marwice (Poland).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial ice-jam locations between 2016 and 2021, which could be determined from the Sentinel data. (<b>b</b>) Magnification of the Oder section with a noticeable accumulation of initial ice-jam locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images of the ice-jam events in December 2022. The red ellipses mark the area of the ice-jam locations (<b>a</b>) Sentinel-1 and (<b>b</b>) Sentinel-2 image taken on 17 December. (<b>c</b>) Sentinel-1 image taken on 20 December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Visualization of the intra-annual ice cover evolution on the Oder River between Kienitz (Germany) and Szczecin (Poland) derived from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images in February 2021. The ice cover extent is shown in light blue color.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ice displacement on the West Oder (red circle) discovered using Sentinel-2 image supporting ice-breakup operations during the 2021 ice-jam event. (<b>b</b>) Sentinel-2 image showing ice floe transport channel on Dabie Lake on 22 February 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Particle tracking velocimetry measurements derived from UAV images during the ice run on 19 February 2021. (<b>a</b>) Ice floe velocities given in pixel per frame within the image space. (<b>b</b>) Ice floe velocities converted into meters per second using ground control points and water level information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Graphical method for overlaying UAV images and the digital elevation model of the Oder River to investigate the interaction between flow control structures and ice cover. (<b>a</b>) UAV image of the ice-jam at the height of Bielinek in February 2021. (<b>b</b>) Angular view of the Oder River DEM with matching camera pose and field of view as UAV image. (<b>c</b>) Resulting superposition of (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) giving the possibility of localizing the groins and investigating potential interactions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>UAV images taken on 19 February at the height of Bielinek. (<b>a</b>) Area of the old ferry pier before the ice run. (<b>b</b>) Area of the old ferry pier during the ice run.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 11741 KiB  
Article
A Google Earth Engine Platform to Integrate Multi-Satellite and Citizen Science Data for the Monitoring of River Ice Dynamics
by Mohamed Abdelkader, Jorge Humberto Bravo Mendez, Marouane Temimi, Dana R. N. Brown, Katie V. Spellman, Christopher D. Arp, Allen Bondurant and Holli Kohl
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(8), 1368; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081368 - 12 Apr 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2908
Abstract
This study introduces a new automated system that blends multi-satellite information and citizen science data for reliable and timely observations of lake and river ice in under-observed northern regions. The system leverages the Google Earth Engine resources to facilitate the analysis and visualization [...] Read more.
This study introduces a new automated system that blends multi-satellite information and citizen science data for reliable and timely observations of lake and river ice in under-observed northern regions. The system leverages the Google Earth Engine resources to facilitate the analysis and visualization of ice conditions. The adopted approach utilizes a combination of moderate and high-resolution optical data, along with radar observations. The results demonstrate the system’s capability to accurately detect and monitor river ice, particularly during key periods, such as the freeze-up and the breakup. The integration citizen science data showed added values in the validation of remote sensing products, as well as filling gaps whenever satellite observations cannot be collected due to cloud obstruction. Moreover, it was shown that citizen science data can be converted to valuable quantitative information, such as the case of ice thickness, which is very useful when combined with ice extent derived from remote sensing. In this study, citizen science data were employed for the quantitative assessment of the remote sensing product. Obtained results showed a good agreement between the product and observed river status, with a Critical Success Index of 0.82. Notably, the system has shown effectiveness in capturing the spatial and temporal evolution of snow and ice conditions, as evidenced by its application in analyzing specific ice jam events in 2023. The study concludes that the developed system marks a significant advancement in river ice monitoring, combining technological innovation with community engagement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Remote Sensing of Snow and Glaciers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of the study area and main rivers network (<b>a</b>), pie chart of rivers with the highest ice jam frequencies (2000–2023) (<b>b</b>), histogram of temporal changes in ice jam numbers (2000–2023) (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological framework for monitoring ice conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Data integration and posting workflow in the Google Earth Engine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>User interface of the river ice monitoring system [<a href="#B54-remotesensing-16-01368" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. The interface showcases the most recent citizen science data as red dots, historical citizen science data in blue, and live cameras in turquoise blue. The date selection tool is highlighted within the green box, data download options are enclosed in the red box, and the screen split feature is outlined in the orange box. A comprehensive legend detailing the displayed river ice maps and ice concentration levels is available in the portal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Confusion matrix and assessment metrics for the VIIRS River Ice product versus the Fresh Eyes on Ice dataset (Water Year 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatiotemporal evolution of ice, snow, and water cover over sections of the Yukon River, water year 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monitoring ice-induced flooding over the Yukon River in Fort Yukon using multi-source data. Sentinel-2 observation (<b>a</b>), citizen science images (<b>b</b>), and VIIRS River Ice product images (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Monitoring of the ice jam along the Forty Mile River near Chicken using Sentinel-2 and citizen science data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monitoring the impact of near-record ice-induced flooding at Circle on 16 May 2023. VIIRS River Ice product (<b>a</b>), VIIRS ice concentration (<b>b</b>), Sentinel-3 image (<b>c</b>), Sentinel-2 image (<b>d</b>), Sentinel-1 image (<b>e</b>), Sentinel-1 image (a detailed zoom-in of image subfigure (e)) (<b>f</b>), citizen science data (<b>g</b>), and citizen science data description (<b>h</b>). The location of the citizen science data is indicated by a red dot.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3635 KiB  
Article
Celerity of Ice Breakup Front in the Regulated Peace River, Canada, and Implications for the Recharge of the Peace–Athabasca Delta
by Spyros Beltaos
Environments 2024, 11(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11020028 - 1 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1803
Abstract
Timely release of flow from upstream hydropower generation facilities on the Peace River can enhance potential ice-jam flooding near the drying Peace–Athabasca Delta (PAD), a Ramsar wetland of international importance and homeland to Indigenous Peoples. An important consideration in deciding whether and when [...] Read more.
Timely release of flow from upstream hydropower generation facilities on the Peace River can enhance potential ice-jam flooding near the drying Peace–Athabasca Delta (PAD), a Ramsar wetland of international importance and homeland to Indigenous Peoples. An important consideration in deciding whether and when to commence a release is the celerity of the breakup front as it advances along the Peace River. Relevant historical data for a key stretch of the river are analyzed to determine average celerities, which can vary by an order of magnitude from year to year. Seven breakup events are identified that might have been candidates for a release, and the predictability of associated celerities is explored in terms of antecedent hydroclimatic variables, including cumulative winter snowfall, snow water equivalent on 1 April, ice cover thickness, coldness of the winter, and freezeup level. It is shown that celerity can be predicted to within a factor of two or less, with the freezeup level giving the best results. Three of the seven “promising” events culminated in PAD floods and were associated with the three highest celerities. The empirical findings are shown to generally align with physical understanding of breakup driving and resisting factors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Plan view of Peace River and Peace–Athabasca Delta (showing only the northern portion of the Athabasca River). River distance from the W.A.C. Bennett Dam is marked at 100 km intervals. The Slave River begins at the MOP and flows in a generally northward direction. From [<a href="#B11-environments-11-00028" class="html-bibr">11</a>], with changes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Observed locations of Peace River ice front downstream of Bennett Dam. From Alberta Environment archived material, 1973–2014, with changes. <a href="https://rivers.alberta.ca/apps/Basins/data/figures/river/abrivers/RFSPubArchive/RiverIce/pubs/2013-2014_Peace_River_Ice_Obs_Rpr_No46.pdf" target="_blank">https://rivers.alberta.ca/apps/Basins/data/figures/river/abrivers/RFSPubArchive/RiverIce/pubs/2013-2014_Peace_River_Ice_Obs_Rpr_No46.pdf</a> (accessed on 4 October 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Thermal advance of the breakup front as a function of flow and upstream water temperature (Equation (1)) for a 600 m wide rectangular channel, assuming 0.8 m thick sheet ice cover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Plan view of lower Peace River and Peace–Athabasca Delta (<b>upper panel</b>) and Peace–Athabasca–Slave River basin (<b>lower panel</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Celerities of promising and unpromising events plotted versus April 1 average snow water equivalent over the Smoky River basin. Data source: Alberta Environment and Protected Areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Celerities of promising and unpromising events plotted versus November–March accumulated snowfall at Grande Prairie, expressed as water equivalent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Celerities of promising and unpromising events plotted versus ice cover thickness at Peace Point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Celerities of promising and unpromising events plotted versus cumulative degree-days of frost at Fort Chipewyan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Celerities of promising and unpromising events plotted versus freezeup level at Peace Point. In 2020, the freezeup level may have been as high as 215.5 m, moving the plotted point “eastward”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variation of the resistance component R<sub>tf</sub> with the freezeup level for the vicinity of the Peace Point hydrometric gauge, 1962 to 2020 data. For Peace Point, the highest known HF is ~215.9 m; HR is taken as 216.0 m.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7413 KiB  
Article
Large-Scale Two-Dimensional Cascade Modeling of the Odra River for Flood Hazard Management
by Robert Banasiak
Water 2024, 16(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010039 - 21 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1994
Abstract
Large-scale two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling at high resolution is still rarely performed because of its high computational cost and the lack of topographical data for some areas. Despite this, such modeling has been performed for the Odra River, the second largest river in Poland. [...] Read more.
Large-scale two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling at high resolution is still rarely performed because of its high computational cost and the lack of topographical data for some areas. Despite this, such modeling has been performed for the Odra River, the second largest river in Poland. This river has a high potential for flooding, which has been severely experienced many times in history, most recently in 1997 and 2010, when floods caused large losses. Since then, many different types of activities have been executed in order to reduce the risk of flooding. The paper presents a 2D modeling concept created during these activities. Given that the river valley is up to several kilometers wide, and consists of many complex topographical features and hydrotechnical facilities, a cascade of 25 2D models in MIKE21 software was developed. It covers a 600 km long section of the Odra River and an area of 5700 km2 in total. A regular grid resolution of 4–6 m was used in the modeling. The models were applied for numerous purposes, first for the elaboration of flood hazard and flood risk maps for larger cities, and then for the verification of historic flood data and stage–discharge relations at gauge stations, as well as the verification of design discharges via flood routing. Other important uses were the evaluation of the effectiveness of flood mitigating works, including the feasibility study for the Racibórz reservoir, and the assessment of flood hazard due to embankment failure or ice jamming. Selected applications, as well as practical aspects of the model’s preparation and use, are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Governance and Sustainable Water Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The cascade of the MIKE21 models for the upper and middle course of the Odra River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bathymetry of the model, which was obtained by merging the integrated raster for the floodplain with the raster obtained from the interpolation of the cross-sections for the part of the main channel covered with water—groins regulating a section near Ścinawa (<b>left</b>); and the Groszowice barrage near Opole (weir and the navigation channel with a lock (<b>right</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calibration of the models by fitting the rating curve to the measured and verified flood discharges: (<b>a</b>) Krapkowice cross-section—verified rating curve; (<b>b</b>) Brzeg Dolny with the analysis of the levee break upstream.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>2D model of the Wrocław City Center Hydrosystem: bathymetry of the 2D model with a grid resolution of 1 × 1 m<sup>2</sup> (<b>a</b>), the calculated water level for the 2010 flood (with the measured water levels (ZWW), (<b>b</b>)), design water level profile against the flood data (HW) (<b>c</b>), and rating curves for selected cross-sections (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dam break simulation at Łany near Wrocław (right bank) for a flood of exceedance probability <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 1% (visualization in MIKEVIEW).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Modeling of flooding caused by ice jams near the city of Głogów [<a href="#B68-water-16-00039" class="html-bibr">68</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The modeling of the passage of the extreme flood wave through the cascade of the Buków polder and the Raciborz reservoir; right the flow situation around the calibration structure (note local high energy head and velocities—arrow indicates a velocity vector of 2 ms<sup>−1</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flood routing for Q<sub>max</sub> = 3500 m<sup>3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. Maximum capacity of the channel between levees amounts to 2990 m<sup>3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. The remaining water is stored on the floodplain with a length of several kilometers.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop