[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (227)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = fuzzy logic controller (FLC)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 7320 KiB  
Article
Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)-Based Control for Solving the Misalignment Problem inVehicle-to-Vehicle Dynamic Wireless Charging Systems
by Md Sadiqur Rahman and Mohd. Hasan Ali
Electronics 2025, 14(3), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030507 (registering DOI) - 26 Jan 2025
Abstract
Vehicle-to-vehicle dynamic wireless charging (V2V-DWC) represents a modern advancement in electrified transportation, where a specialized charging vehicle delivers power to another vehicle on the move. The rising popularity of this technology can be attributed to the gradual advancements in energy storage technologies and [...] Read more.
Vehicle-to-vehicle dynamic wireless charging (V2V-DWC) represents a modern advancement in electrified transportation, where a specialized charging vehicle delivers power to another vehicle on the move. The rising popularity of this technology can be attributed to the gradual advancements in energy storage technologies and the scarcity of plug-in charging infrastructure. V2V wireless power transfer provides a solution for electric vehicles (EVs) to recharge their batteries while in transit. The existing literature confirms the empirical validation of this concept through analytical and experimental studies, yet the challenge of misalignment remains insufficiently explored. Achieving optimal power transfer in V2V systems necessitates precise alignment of the inductive coils. Lateral misalignment (LTM) occurs due to the deviation of the coils from the proper alignment, leading to significant energy losses. Additionally, the development of effective controllers to address the V2V misalignment problem remains inadequate. This study proposes the development of a neural network-based adaptive fuzzy logic controller (ANFIS) to alleviate the misalignment issues in V2V-DWC systems. A comparative analysis is conducted between the proposed ANFIS controller and the conventional fuzzy logic controller (FLC) to evaluate their performance across various degrees of LTM. The performance of the proposed ANFIS controller is evaluated through simulations in MATLAB/Simulink, supplemented by experimental testing. The results indicate that the proposed ANFIS controller surpasses the FLC in both simulation and experimental contexts in addressing the V2V misalignment challenge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Industrial Electronics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of a vehicle-to-vehicle dynamic wireless charging system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>V2V-DWC process equivalent circuit diagram [<a href="#B16-electronics-14-00507" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mutual coupling between two coils [<a href="#B16-electronics-14-00507" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mutual inductance and coupling factor variation with LTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Concept of the proposed controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the structure of ANFIS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ANFIS model structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Training error of the proposed ANFIS (mean squared error: 0.9 after 100 epochs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Validation of ANFIS structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Membership functions for the FLC input (ΔI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Membership functions for the FLC output (θ).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison between FLC and ANFIS controller response (for LTM = 30%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison between FLC and ANFIS controller response (for LTM = 40%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison between FLC and ANFIS controller response (for varying LTM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Inverter efficiency for different LTM scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) ANFIS controller current response and receiver coil power output. (<b>b</b>) Controller efficiency for different LTM scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Experimental setup for small-scale V2V DWC process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>EV charging status during DWC process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Inverter output voltage using the ANFIS controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Inverter output voltage using the fuzzy logic controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Current response comparison between ANFIS and FLC (LTM = 40%).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 15305 KiB  
Article
Analyses of PO-Based Fuzzy Logic-Controlled MPPT and Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithms in PV Systems
by Fevzi Çakmak, Zafer Aydoğmuş and Mehmet Rıda Tür
Energies 2025, 18(2), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020233 - 7 Jan 2025
Viewed by 485
Abstract
This manuscript aims to increase the utilization of solar energy, which is both environmentally friendly and easily accessible, to satisfy the energy needs of developing countries. In order to achieve this goal, maximum power generation should be provided from photovoltaic panels. Several maximum [...] Read more.
This manuscript aims to increase the utilization of solar energy, which is both environmentally friendly and easily accessible, to satisfy the energy needs of developing countries. In order to achieve this goal, maximum power generation should be provided from photovoltaic panels. Several maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods are utilized for maximum power generation in photovoltaic panel systems under different weather conditions. In this paper, a novel intelligent hybrid fuzzy logic-controlled maximum power point tracking algorithm founded on the perturb and observe (PO) algorithm is presented. The proposed fuzzy logic controller algorithm and the incremental conductivity maximum power point tracking algorithm were simulated in a MATLAB(2018b version)/Simulink environment and evaluated by comparing the results. Four Sharp ND-F4Q295 solar panels, two in series and two in parallel, were used for the simulation. In this study, the voltage ripple of the proposed hybrid method was measured at 1% compared to the classical incremental conductivity method, while it was 8.6% in the IncCon method. Similarly, the current ripple was 1.08% in the proposed hybrid FLC method, while the current ripple was 9.27% in the IncCon method. It is observed that the proposed smart method stabilizes the system voltage faster, at 25 ms, in the event of sudden weather changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Photovoltaic Solar Energy II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Increasing conductivity on the P-V graph of the PV panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the IncCon algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>PO MPPT flowchart [<a href="#B37-energies-18-00233" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fuzzy system [<a href="#B42-energies-18-00233" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fuzzification process [<a href="#B43-energies-18-00233" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Fuzzy logic algorithm flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FLC is based on the proposed method [<a href="#B44-energies-18-00233" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-energies-18-00233" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Block diagram of the implementation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>MATLAB editor view of a fuzzy logic simulation of the implementation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Input and output membership functions used for FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Voltage, current, temperature, and irradiation graphs of the PV system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>MATLAB/Simulink simulation study of PV system with fuzzy logic-controlled MPPT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>MATLAB/Simulink simulation study of FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The voltage of the PV system and FLC-controlled boost converter output voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The FLC-controlled boost converter output voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The current of the PV system and the FLC-controlled boost converter output current.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Power generated from the PV module and fuzzy logic-controlled boost output power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Incoming PV panel irradiation and FLC-controlled boost output power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>PV system voltage and IncCon-controlled boost output voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>PV system current and IncCon-controlled boost output current.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>PV system-generated power and IncCon-controlled boost converter output power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Incoming PV panel irradiation and the IncCon-controlled boost output power.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 10032 KiB  
Article
Improvement of the TEB Algorithm for Local Path Planning of Car-like Mobile Robots Based on Fuzzy Logic Control
by Lei Chen, Rui Liu, Daiyang Jia, Sijing Xian and Guo Ma
Actuators 2025, 14(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/act14010012 - 4 Jan 2025
Viewed by 587
Abstract
TEB (timed elastic band) can efficiently generate optimal trajectories that match the motion characteristics of car-like robots. However, the quality of the generated trajectories is often unstable, and they sometimes violate boundary conditions. Therefore, this paper proposes a fuzzy logic control–TEB algorithm (FLC-TEB). [...] Read more.
TEB (timed elastic band) can efficiently generate optimal trajectories that match the motion characteristics of car-like robots. However, the quality of the generated trajectories is often unstable, and they sometimes violate boundary conditions. Therefore, this paper proposes a fuzzy logic control–TEB algorithm (FLC-TEB). This method adds smoothness and jerk objectives to make the trajectory generated by TEB smoother and the control more stable. Building on this, a fuzzy controller is proposed based on the kinematic constraints of car-like robots. It uses the narrowness and turning complexity of the trajectory as inputs to dynamically adjust the weights of TEB’s internal objectives to obtain stable and high-quality trajectories in different environments. The results of real car-like robot tests show that compared to the classical TEB, FLC-TEB increased the trajectory time by 16% but reduced the trajectory length by 16%. The trajectory smoothness was significantly improved, the change in the turning angle on the trajectory was reduced by 39%, the smoothness of the linear velocity increased by 71%, and the smoothness of the angular velocity increased by 38%, with no reverse movement occurring. This indicates that when planning trajectories for car-like mobile robots, while FLC-TEB slightly increases the total trajectory time, it provides more stable, smoother, and shorter trajectories compared to the classical TEB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Actuators for Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>TEB uses a hypergraph to represent the nonlinear optimization problem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Timed elastic band local planner.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The kinematic model of car-like mobile robots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Non-holonomic constraints of car-like mobile robots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>TEB algorithm using fuzzy controller to dynamically adjust objective term weights.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optimization results in the same environment: (<b>a</b>) Classical TEB optimization result; (<b>b</b>) TEB optimization result after adding trajectory smoothness and jerk objectives. White grids: empty areas; black grids: obstacles; gray grids: inflated obstacles; green curve: global path; red arrows: trajectory poses; purple border: robot simulation model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The minimum turning radius limits the solution space of feasible paths for car-like robots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The car-like robot uses a combination of backward and forward movements to adjust its orientation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A car-like mobile robot performs continuous turning movements along a trajectory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Membership function graph for narrowness (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>); (<b>b</b>) membership function graph for turning complexity (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Mapping of output variables using piecewise functions to obtain optimized weights.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Output weight membership functions: (<b>a</b>) obstacle weight fuzzy membership function; (<b>b</b>) smoothness/velocity/acceleration/jerk weight fuzzy membership function; (<b>c</b>) optimal time/shortest path weight fuzzy membership function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Fuzzy control inference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>A car-like robot moving through a narrow corridor with multiple corners. The green curve represents the global path, the red curve represents the motion trajectory, and the arrows indicate the heading angles at the trajectory points, and the purple box represents the robot's simulation model. Additionally, the green elliptical frame illustrates the robot's inflation radius, and the red squares represent obstacles associated with the TEB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of TEB, Smooth-TEB, and FLC-TEB planning results at the entrance of Simulation Map 1: (<b>a</b>) linear velocity comparison; (<b>b</b>) angular velocity comparison; (<b>c</b>) path comparison; (<b>d</b>) path length and duration comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Comparison of TEB, Smooth-TEB, and FLC-TEB planning results at the entrance of Simulation Map 1: (<b>a</b>) linear velocity comparison; (<b>b</b>) angular velocity comparison; (<b>c</b>) path comparison; (<b>d</b>) path length and duration comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of robot motion results for TEB, Smooth-TEB, and FLC-TEB in the complete Simulation Map 1: (<b>a</b>) linear velocity comparison; (<b>b</b>) angular velocity comparison; (<b>c</b>) path comparison; (<b>d</b>) path length and duration comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>A car-like robot moving in Simulation Map 2. The green curve represents the global path, the red curve represents the local path (trajectory), with arrows indicating the trajectory points. The red grids on obstacles and green lines represent obstacle regions associated using the ROS costmap-converter plugin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Comparison of robot motion results for TEB, Smooth-TEB, and FLC-TEB in the complete Simulation Map 2: (<b>a</b>) linear velocity comparison; (<b>b</b>) angular velocity comparison; (<b>c</b>) path comparison; (<b>d</b>) path length and duration comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The car-like robot used in this paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Map built using SLAM in real car-like robot tests: (<b>a</b>) map of an open area inside a campus; (<b>b</b>) the actual driving area on the map; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) images from the real car-like robot during the test drive.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20 Cont.
<p>Map built using SLAM in real car-like robot tests: (<b>a</b>) map of an open area inside a campus; (<b>b</b>) the actual driving area on the map; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) images from the real car-like robot during the test drive.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Comparison of TEB, Smooth-TEB, FLC-TEB in real car-like robot test map: (<b>a</b>) linear velocity comparison; (<b>b</b>) angular velocity comparison; (<b>c</b>) path comparison; (<b>d</b>) path length and duration comparison.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 16984 KiB  
Article
An Enhanced Solar Battery Charger Using a DC-DC Single-Ended Primary-Inductor Converter and Fuzzy Logic-Based Control for Off-Grid Photovoltaic Applications
by Julio López Seguel, Samuel Zenteno, Crystopher Arancibia, José Rodríguez, Mokhtar Aly, Seleme I. Seleme and Lenin M. F. Morais
Processes 2025, 13(1), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010099 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 669
Abstract
Battery charging systems are crucial for energy storage in off-grid photovoltaic (PV) installations. Since the power generated by a PV panel is conditioned by climatic conditions and load characteristics, a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique is required to maximize PV power and [...] Read more.
Battery charging systems are crucial for energy storage in off-grid photovoltaic (PV) installations. Since the power generated by a PV panel is conditioned by climatic conditions and load characteristics, a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique is required to maximize PV power and accelerate battery charging. On the other hand, a battery must be carefully charged, ensuring that its charging current and voltage limits are not exceeded, thereby preventing premature degradation. However, the voltage generated by the PV panel during MPPT operation fluctuates, which can harm the battery, particularly during periods of intense radiation when overvoltages are likely to occur. To address these issues, the design and construction of an enhanced solar battery charger utilizing a single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) and soft computing (SC)-based control is presented. A control strategy is employed that integrates voltage stabilization and MPPT functions through two dedicated fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs), which manage battery charging using a three-mode scheme: MPPT, Absorption, and Float. This approach optimizes available PV power while guaranteeing fast and safe battery charging. The developed charger leverages the SEPIC’s notable features for PV applications, including a wide input voltage range, minimal input current ripple, and an easy-to-drive switch. Moreover, unlike most PV charger control strategies in the literature that combine improved traditional MPPT methods with classical proportional integral (PI)-based control loops, the proposed control adopts a fully SC-based strategy, effectively addressing common drawbacks of conventional methods, such as slowness and inaccuracy during sudden atmospheric fluctuations. Simulations in MATLAB/Simulink compared the FLCs’ performance with conventional methods (P&O, IncCond, and PID). Additionally, a low-power hardware prototype using an Arduino Due microcontroller was built to evaluate the battery charger’s behavior under real weather conditions. The simulated and experimental results both demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the solar charger. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Renewable Energy Systems (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Layout of the proposed solar charger.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Equivalent electrical model of an ideal PV cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>P-V characteristics of WANT-M55W solar module at a constant environmental temperature of 25 °C, a NOCT of 47 °C, and varying irradiance levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SEPIC circuit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Battery charging phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flow diagram of the power management strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Block diagram of an FLC controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Representation of power variations against voltage variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Parameters of the proposed FL-MPPT algorithm: (<b>a</b>) S; (<b>b</b>) ΔP<sub>PV</sub>; (<b>c</b>) ΔD; (<b>d</b>) control surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Parameters of the designed FL-VC: (<b>a</b>) E; (<b>b</b>) ΔE; (<b>c</b>) ΔD; (<b>d</b>) control surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simulation scheme implemented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Behavior of the MPPT methods at a fixed air temperature of 25 °C with various irradiance levels and a load of R = 15 Ω.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Behavior of the MPPT methods at a fixed air temperature of 25 °C with various irradiance levels and a load of R = 30 Ω.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Behavior of the MPPT methods for a fixed air temperature of 25 °C and various irradiance levels and a load of R = 60 Ω.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparative performance analysis of the voltage controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The practical hardware setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>MOSFET drain-source signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>FL-MPPT transient behavior in response to load disturbance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>FL-MPPT efficiency at distinct irradiance intensities: (<b>a</b>) low intensity; (<b>b</b>) medium intensity; (<b>c</b>) high intensity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Reference change test for the FL-VC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Load disturbance test for the FL-VC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Experimental results for the three-mode charging strategy.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 4954 KiB  
Article
Automatic Voltage Regulator Betterment Based on a New Fuzzy FOPI+FOPD Tuned by TLBO
by Mokhtar Shouran and Mohammed Alenezi
Fractal Fract. 2025, 9(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9010021 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 537
Abstract
This paper presents a novel Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) framework aimed at enhancing the performance and stability of Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVRs) in power systems. The proposed system combines fuzzy control theory with the Fractional Order Proportional Integral Derivative (FOPID) technique and employs [...] Read more.
This paper presents a novel Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) framework aimed at enhancing the performance and stability of Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVRs) in power systems. The proposed system combines fuzzy control theory with the Fractional Order Proportional Integral Derivative (FOPID) technique and employs cascading control theory to significantly improve reliability and robustness. The unique control architecture, termed Fuzzy Fractional Order Proportional Integral (PI) plus Fractional Order Proportional Derivative (PD) plus Integral (Fuzzy FOPI+FOPD+I), integrates advanced control methodologies to achieve superior performance. To optimize the controller parameters, the Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm is utilized in conjunction with the Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE) objective function, ensuring precise tuning for optimal control behavior. The methodology is validated through comparative analyses with controllers reported in prior studies, highlighting substantial improvements in performance metrics. Key findings demonstrate significant reductions in peak overshoot, peak undershoot, and settling time, emphasizing the proposed controller’s effectiveness. Additionally, the robustness of the controller is extensively evaluated under challenging scenarios, including parameter uncertainties and load disturbances. Results confirm its ability to maintain stability and performance across a wide range of conditions, outperforming existing methods. This study presents a notable contribution by introducing an innovative control structure that addresses critical challenges in AVR systems, paving the way for more resilient and efficient power system operations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Fractional-Order Systems to Automatic Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of generalized AVR components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The traditional AVR model without a controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Step response of AVR system without controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A root locus diagram of the AVR system without a controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The proposed Fuzzy FOPI+FOPD+I AVR system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The membership functions of the fuzzy controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The TLBO-tuned Fuzzy FOPI+FOPD+I for AVR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The flowchart of the TLBO algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The convergence curve of TLBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The dynamic response of the AVR system based on different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Settling and rise times of different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>ITAE of different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Peak overshoot and undershoot of different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Step responses of AVR systems without controller under different parametric uncertainty conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Step responses of AVR systems when system is subjected to parametric uncertainties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Step responses of AVR systems when system is subjected to parametric uncertainties with load disturbance.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6344 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Energy Management in Electric Vehicles Through a Fuzzy Logic-Based Strategy
by Efe Savran, Esin Karpat and Fatih Karpat
Sustainability 2025, 17(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010089 - 26 Dec 2024
Viewed by 629
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a fuzzy logic controller (FLC)-based energy management strategy for battery electric vehicles that enables them to reduce their energy consumption and carbon emission levels without sacrificing their performance. An electric vehicle model was developed in [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to develop a fuzzy logic controller (FLC)-based energy management strategy for battery electric vehicles that enables them to reduce their energy consumption and carbon emission levels without sacrificing their performance. An electric vehicle model was developed in MATLAB/Simulink using a virtual battery and validated with real-world driving tests to save time and money. An in-depth investigation is conducted on both virtual and real vehicles to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed energy management strategy. This study shows that by using FLC-based energy management, an energy consumption advantage of 9.16% can be achieved while maintaining acceptable performance levels in real-world driving conditions. This advantage results in significant reductions annually: 1044.09 tons of CO2 emissions, USD 164,770.65 in savings for electric bus lines, and 5079 battery cycles. For European passenger electric vehicles, this corresponds to 405,657.6 tons of CO2 emissions reduced, USD 64,017,840 saved, and 5.071 battery cycles per vehicle. This strategy not only enhances energy efficiency but also contributes to long-term sustainability in public transportation systems, particularly for electric bus fleets, which play a critical role in urban mobility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Transportation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical flow of the methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the virtual EV model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Visualization of the virtual vehicle model in MATLAB/Simulink.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Virtual vehicle model validation test procedure: real-world driving route (<b>left</b>), a moment of test driving (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Data−driven validation results: (<b>a</b>) vehicle speed, (<b>b</b>) motor speed, (<b>c</b>) motor torque, (<b>d</b>) motor power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FLC integrated virtual vehicle model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FLC tool interfaces: (<b>a</b>) main page, (<b>b</b>) ruler viewer, (<b>c</b>) velocity membership functions, (<b>d</b>) pedal ratio membership functions, (<b>e</b>) SoC membership functions, (<b>f</b>) torque membership functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>FLC tool interfaces: (<b>a</b>) main page, (<b>b</b>) ruler viewer, (<b>c</b>) velocity membership functions, (<b>d</b>) pedal ratio membership functions, (<b>e</b>) SoC membership functions, (<b>f</b>) torque membership functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Membership functions of FLC-V1 and FLC-V2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Real-world driving test procedure: (<b>a</b>) FLC-V1 integrated driving moment, (<b>b</b>) FLC-V2 integrated driving moment, (<b>c</b>) driving data obtained from driving route.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>FLC—V1 driven first trial speed graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Vehicle performance comparison with FLC.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 13847 KiB  
Article
Sigma Delta Modulation Controller and Associated Cybersecurity Issues with Battery Energy Storage Integrated with PV-Based Microgrid
by Syeda Afra Saiara and Mohd. Hasan Ali
Energies 2024, 17(24), 6463; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246463 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 605
Abstract
Battery energy storage systems (BESSs) play a crucial role in integrating renewable energy sources into microgrids. However, robust BESS controllers are needed to carry out this function properly. Existing controllers suffer from overshoots and slow convergence issues. Moreover, as electrical grid networks become [...] Read more.
Battery energy storage systems (BESSs) play a crucial role in integrating renewable energy sources into microgrids. However, robust BESS controllers are needed to carry out this function properly. Existing controllers suffer from overshoots and slow convergence issues. Moreover, as electrical grid networks become increasingly connected, the risk of cyberattacks grows, and traditional physics-based anomaly detection methods face challenges such as reliance on predefined models, high computational demands, and limited scalability for complex, large-scale data. To address the limitations of the existing approaches, this paper first proposes a novel sigma-delta modulation (SDM) controller for BESSs in solar photovoltaic (PV)-connected microgrids. The performance of SDM has been compared with those of the proportional–integral (PI) controller and fuzzy logic controller (FLC). Also, this paper proposes an improved ensemble-based method to detect the false data injection (FDI) and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks on the BESS controller. The performance of the proposed detection method has been compared with that of the traditional ensemble-based method. Four PV-connected microgrid systems, namely the solar DC microgrid, grid-connected solar AC microgrid, hybrid AC microgrid with two BESSs, and hybrid AC microgrid with a single BESS, have been considered to show the effectiveness of the proposed control and detection methods. The MATLAB/Simulink-based results show the effectiveness and better performance of the proposed controller and detection methods. Numerical results demonstrate the improved performance of the proposed SDM controller, with a 35% reduction in AC bus voltage error compared to the conventional PI controller and FLC. Similarly, the proposed SAMME AdaBoost detection method achieves superior accuracy with an F1 score of 95%, outperforming the existing ensemble approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A1: Smart Grids and Microgrids)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Hybrid AC Microgrid with Two BESSs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wind Speed Variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Varying Irradiance in PV Panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>AC Bus Voltage During Varying Generation Conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Duty Cycle of BESS Converter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cyberattack on BESS-Integrated Hybrid Microgrid System.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Impact of FDI Attack on PV-BESS Controller of Hybrid Microgrid System.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Impact of DoS Attack on PV-BESS Power Profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Solar DC Microgrid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Grid-Connected Solar AC Microgrid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Hybrid AC Microgrid with a single BESS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Sigma-Delta Modulation (SDM) Controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Architecture of PI Controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Membership Function for Fuzzy Logic Controller Input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Membership Function for Fuzzy Logic Controller Output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>DC Bus Power Comparison among three different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>DC Bus Voltage Comparison among three different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>BESS Power Comparison among three different controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>AC Load Power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>AC Bus RMS Voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>BESS Power comparison among three controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>AC Load Power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Common AC Bus RMS Voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>PV_BESS Power in Hybrid Microgrid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>WIND_BESS Power in Hybrid Microgrid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>AC Load Power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Common AC Bus RMS Voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>BESS Power for Single Battery at AC Bus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Flowchart of Improved Ensemble Learning (SAMME AdaBoost) Method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Confusion Matrix of SAMME AdaBoost Model for Detecting Cyberattacks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Comparison between SAMME AdaBoost Model and Existing Ensemble Learning Model (AdaBoost) in “Class 0” Prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>Comparison between Ensemble Learning Model and SAMME AdaBoost Model in “Class 1” Prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>Comparison between Ensemble Learning Model and SAMME AdaBoost Model in “Class 2” Prediction.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 6512 KiB  
Article
Rehabilitation Technologies by Integrating Exoskeletons, Aquatic Therapy, and Quantum Computing for Enhanced Patient Outcomes
by Fabio Salgado-Gomes-Sagaz, Vanessa Zorrilla-Muñoz and Nicolas Garcia-Aracil
Sensors 2024, 24(23), 7765; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237765 - 4 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1156
Abstract
Recent advancements in patient rehabilitation integrate both traditional and modern techniques to enhance treatment efficacy and accessibility. Hydrotherapy, leveraging water’s physical properties, is crucial for reducing joint stress, alleviating pain, and improving circulation. The rehabilitation of upper limbs benefits from technologies like virtual [...] Read more.
Recent advancements in patient rehabilitation integrate both traditional and modern techniques to enhance treatment efficacy and accessibility. Hydrotherapy, leveraging water’s physical properties, is crucial for reducing joint stress, alleviating pain, and improving circulation. The rehabilitation of upper limbs benefits from technologies like virtual reality and robotics which, when combined with hydrotherapy, can accelerate recovery. Exoskeletons, which support and enhance movement, have shown promise for patients with neurological conditions or injuries. This study focused on implementing and comparing proportional–integral–derivative (PID) and fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs) in a lower limb exoskeleton. Initial PID control tests revealed instability, leading to a switch to a PI controller for better stability and the development of a fuzzy control system. A hybrid strategy was then applied, using FLC for smooth initial movements and PID for precise tracking, with optimized weighting to improve performance. The combination of PID and fuzzy controllers, with tailored weighting (70% for moderate angles and 100% for extensive movements), enhanced the exoskeleton’s stability and precision. This study also explored quantum computing techniques, such as the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) and the quantum Fourier transform (QFT), to optimize controller tuning and improve real-time control, highlighting the potential of these advanced tools in refining rehabilitation devices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Communications Challenges in Health and Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic phases of proposed implementation of aquatic rehabilitation system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the proposed design in the main project NOHA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Progression from using the PID method to implementing a hybrid approach that combines PID and fuzzy controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Figure: Lower limb exoskeleton showing the selected part for control. (<b>Center</b>) Figure: model created from the selected part of the exoskeleton. (<b>Right</b>) Figure: hydrotherapy tank with the prototype created.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>PID block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>Left</b>): PID graph 1: Degrees x Time (s); yellow is the setpoint and blue is the position. (<b>Right</b>): PID graph 2: Degrees x Time (s); orange is the setpoint and blue is the position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>Left</b>): fuzzyfication block. (<b>Middle</b>): membership functions. (<b>Right</b>): defuzzyfication block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>HMI screen created.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Control loop with the HMI, PLC, EPOS, motor, and prototype.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>First (<b>left</b>) and second (<b>right</b>) ponderation graphic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Function block for the ponderation calculations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Function block for the ramp block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Weighted controller: (<b>a</b>). Controller for 70% for 30°. (<b>b</b>). Controller for 70% for 25°. (<b>c</b>). Controller for 70% for 35°. (<b>d</b>). Controller for 50% for 20°. (<b>e</b>). Controller for 50% for 17°. (<b>f</b>). Controller for 50% for 24°. (<b>g</b>). Controller for 30% for 40°. (<b>h</b>). Controller for 30% for 35°. (<b>i</b>). Controller for 30% for 44°. (<b>j</b>). Controller for 100% for 45°. (<b>k</b>). Controller for 100% for 50°.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 9035 KiB  
Article
Design and Implementation of an AI-Based Robotic Arm for Strawberry Harvesting
by Chung-Liang Chang and Cheng-Chieh Huang
Agriculture 2024, 14(11), 2057; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14112057 - 15 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1274
Abstract
This study presents the design and implementation of a wire-driven, multi-joint robotic arm equipped with a cutting and gripping mechanism for harvesting delicate strawberries, with the goal of reducing labor and costs. The arm is mounted on a lifting mechanism and linked to [...] Read more.
This study presents the design and implementation of a wire-driven, multi-joint robotic arm equipped with a cutting and gripping mechanism for harvesting delicate strawberries, with the goal of reducing labor and costs. The arm is mounted on a lifting mechanism and linked to a laterally movable module, which is affixed to the tube cultivation shelf. The trained deep learning model can instantly detect strawberries, identify optimal picking points, and estimate the contour area of fruit while the mobile platform is in motion. A two-stage fuzzy logic control (2s-FLC) method is employed to adjust the length of the arm and bending angle, enabling the end of the arm to approach the fruit picking position. The experimental results indicate a 90% accuracy in fruit detection, an 82% success rate in harvesting, and an average picking time of 6.5 s per strawberry, reduced to 5 s without arm recovery time. The performance of the proposed system in harvesting strawberries of different sizes under varying lighting conditions is also statistically analyzed and evaluated in this paper. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of joint arm swing (the black dotted line indicates the trajectory of the arm swing).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structure of the multi-jointed robotic arm (<b>center</b>); base of the arm (<b>top left</b>) and end joint (<b>bottom left</b>); internal hoses and thin wires within the arm (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Design of clamp and cutting tool. (<b>a</b>) The structure of clamping and cutting tools; (<b>b</b>) clamp in the open state; (<b>c</b>) clamp in the closed state; (<b>d</b>) prototype of the two sets of clamps; (<b>e</b>) mounting of the clamp on the joint arm (with the upper clamp in the open state and the lower clamp in the closed state); (<b>f</b>) the clamp in action for picking strawberries (the nozzle is installed inside the tube, bottom left).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Clamp cutting part with two blades and gripping part with two foam pads.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hydroponic fruit picking platform: ➀ hydroponic PVC pipe and aluminum extrusion track; ➁ pulley module; ➂ module for raising and lowering the arm; ➃ arm with two camera units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Robotic arm and lifting module: (<b>a</b>) prototype of lifting module and mechanism; (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) show the actions of extending the robotic arm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Process of creating the object model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Side view of fruit models in three different sizes, labeled Size 1 (<b>a</b>), Size 2 (<b>b</b>), and Size 3 (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Coordinate configuration of arm and strawberry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The block diagram of 2s-FLC system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Input and output variable fuzzification for FLC 1 and FLC 2. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">v</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </semantics></math> for input of FLC 1; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>a</mi> </semantics></math> for input of FLC 1 and FLC 2; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">PWM</mi> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Z</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for output of FLC 1; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">PWM</mi> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Z</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for input of FLC 2; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">PWM</mi> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for output of FLC 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Example of fuzzy inference and defuzzification; fuzzy inference results when <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">v</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </semantics></math> = 600 and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>5</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>pixel</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> (FLC 1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Fuzzy inference surfaces of FLC 1 (<b>left</b>) and FLC 2 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Strawberry identification results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Bending test of the jointed arm. (<b>a</b>) Simulated joint arm bending using the Simulink tool, (<b>b</b>) arm bending without the plastic tube inserted, and (<b>c</b>) arm bending with the plastic tube inserted.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Swing trajectory of the joint arm. (<b>a</b>) Bending trajectories of PVC plastic pipes with insertion (blue line) and without insertion (black dashed line); (<b>b</b>) Relationship between joint arm lengths and swing trajectories (each color represents the swing trajectory for a different joint arm length).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Average time per fruit for single fruit picking operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Snapshot of the experimental site (strawberry models of different sizes hung on one side).</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Performance comparison of the detection model at various times.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Strawberry picking experiment site (with strawberry models of different sizes hanging on both sides).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Snapshots of the joint arm grasping a strawberry. (<b>a</b>) The joint arm is lowered and aligned with the target; (<b>b</b>) the joint arm rises; (<b>c</b>) the joint arm bends; (<b>d</b>) the gripper cuts the stem; (<b>e</b>) the gripper clamps the stem; (<b>f</b>) the arm is lowered; (<b>g</b>) the gripper releases the stem; (<b>h</b>) the mobile platform moves to the next target. Images (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>) respectively illustrate the lifting and bending of arm toward the strawberry stem (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>), the gripping action (<b>k</b>), and finally the arm in a lowered position (<b>l</b>).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 5421 KiB  
Article
Fuzzy Logic-Based Smart Control of Wind Energy Conversion System Using Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction Generator
by Amar Maafa, Hacene Mellah, Karim Benaouicha, Badreddine Babes, Abdelghani Yahiou and Hamza Sahraoui
Sustainability 2024, 16(21), 9333; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219333 - 27 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1526
Abstract
This paper introduces a robust system designed to effectively manage and enhance the electrical output of a Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) using a Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction Generator (CDFIG) connected to a power grid. The solution that was investigated is the use [...] Read more.
This paper introduces a robust system designed to effectively manage and enhance the electrical output of a Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) using a Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction Generator (CDFIG) connected to a power grid. The solution that was investigated is the use of a CDFIG that is based on a variable-speed wind power conversion chain. It comprises the electrical and mechanical connection of two DFIGs through their rotors. The originality of this paper lies in the innovative application of a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) in combination with a CDFIG for a WECS. To demonstrate that this novel configuration enhances control precision and performance in WECSs, we conducted a comparison of three different controllers: a proportional–integral (PI) controller, a fractional PID (FPID) controller, and a fuzzy logic controller (FLC). The results highlight the potential of the proposed system in optimizing power generation and improving overall system stability. It turns out that, according to the first results, the FLC performed optimally in terms of tracking and rejecting disturbances. In terms of peak overshoot for power and torque, the findings indicate that the proposed FLC-based technique (3.8639% and 6.9401%) outperforms that of the FOPID (11.2458% and 10.9654%) and PI controllers (11.4219% and 11.0712%), respectively. These results demonstrate the superior performance of the FLC in reducing overshoot, providing better control stability for both power and torque. In terms of rise time, the findings show that all controllers perform similarly for both power and torque. However, the FLC demonstrates superior performance with a rise time of 0.0016 s for both power and torque, compared to the FOPID (1.9999 s and 1.9999 s) and PI (0.0250 s and 0.0247 s) controllers. This highlights the FLC’s enhanced responsiveness in controlling power and torque. In terms of settling time, all three controllers have almost the same performance of 1.9999. An examination of total harmonic distortion (THD) was also employed to validate the superiority of the FLC. In terms of power quality, the findings prove that a WECS based on an FLC (0.93%) has a smaller total harmonic distortion (THD) compared to that of the FOPID (1.21%) and PI (1.51%) controllers. This system solves the problem by removing the requirement for sliding ring–brush contact. Through the utilization of the MATLAB/Simulink environment, the effectiveness of this control and energy management approach was evaluated, thereby demonstrating its capacity to fulfill the objectives that were set. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The connection of the CDFIG to the electrical network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The connection of the CDFIG to the electrical network via power converters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>DC link regulation scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Network-side current regulation scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Closed-loop system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FOPID controller applied to WECS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Range of logical values: (<b>a</b>) Boolean logic, (<b>b</b>) fuzzy logic [<a href="#B63-sustainability-16-09333" class="html-bibr">63</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Design of fuzzy logic controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Membership functions: (<b>a</b>) error (<span class="html-italic">e</span>), (<b>b</b>) change of error (<span class="html-italic">de</span>), (<b>c</b>) output (<span class="html-italic">u</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Membership functions: (<b>a</b>) error (<span class="html-italic">e</span>), (<b>b</b>) change of error (<span class="html-italic">de</span>), (<b>c</b>) output (<span class="html-italic">u</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Various controllers’ responses to power steps: (<b>a</b>) active power, (<b>b</b>) generator torque.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>A comparative study between FLC, PI, and FOPID characteristics for the torque and active power: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> rise time <span class="html-italic">T<sub>r</sub></span> (s); (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> settling time <span class="html-italic">T<sub>s</sub></span> (s); (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">T<sub>e</sub></span> rise time <span class="html-italic">T<sub>r</sub></span> (s); (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">T<sub>e</sub></span> settling time <span class="html-italic">T<sub>s</sub></span> (s); (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> peak overshoot (%); (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">T<sub>e</sub></span> peak overshoot (%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Characteristics of CDFIG with integration of inertia of wind turbine: (<b>a</b>) wind speed (m/s); (<b>b</b>) generator speed (rpm); (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> (MW); (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> (MVAR).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The energy conversion chain and its control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Characteristics of CDFIG with random wind speed: (<b>a</b>) wind speed (m/s); (<b>b</b>) generator speed (rpm); (<b>c</b>) THD of first stator; (<b>d</b>) THD of first stator; (<b>e</b>) THD of first stator; (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> (MW); (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> (MVAR); (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>2</sub> (MW); (<b>i</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>s</sub></span><sub>2</sub> (MVAR); (<b>j</b>) torque <span class="html-italic">T<sub>e</sub></span> (KN.m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Characteristics of CDFIG with random wind speed: (<b>a</b>) wind speed (m/s); (<b>b</b>) generator speed (rpm); (<b>c</b>) THD of first stator; (<b>d</b>) THD of first stator; (<b>e</b>) THD of first stator; (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> (MW); (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>s</sub></span><sub>1</sub> (MVAR); (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">P<sub>s</sub></span><sub>2</sub> (MW); (<b>i</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>s</sub></span><sub>2</sub> (MVAR); (<b>j</b>) torque <span class="html-italic">T<sub>e</sub></span> (KN.m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Characteristics of CDFIG with energy production system.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 12513 KiB  
Article
UAV Trajectory Tracking Using Proportional-Integral-Derivative-Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller with Genetic Algorithm Parameter Tuning
by Oumaïma Moali, Dhafer Mezghani, Abdelkader Mami, Abdelatif Oussar and Abdelkrim Nemra
Sensors 2024, 24(20), 6678; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206678 - 17 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 884
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-type Quadrotors are highly nonlinear systems that are difficult to control and stabilize outdoors, especially in a windy environment. Many algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem of trajectory tracking using UAVs. However, current control systems face significant hurdles, [...] Read more.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-type Quadrotors are highly nonlinear systems that are difficult to control and stabilize outdoors, especially in a windy environment. Many algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem of trajectory tracking using UAVs. However, current control systems face significant hurdles, such as parameter uncertainties, modeling errors, and challenges in windy environments. Sensitivity to parameter variations may lead to performance degradation or instability. Modeling errors arise from simplifications, causing disparities between assumed and actual behavior. Classical controls may lack adaptability to dynamic changes, necessitating adaptive strategies. Limited robustness in handling uncertainties can result in suboptimal performance. Windy environments introduce disturbances, impacting system dynamics and precision. The complexity of wind modeling demands advanced estimation and compensation strategies. Tuning challenges may necessitate frequent adjustments, posing practical limitations. Researchers have explored advanced control paradigms, including robust, adaptive, and predictive control, aiming to enhance system performance amidst uncertainties in a scientifically rigorous manner. Our approach does not require knowledge of UAVs and noise models. Furthermore, the use of the Type-2 controller makes our approach robust in the face of uncertainties. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is clear from the obtained results. In this paper, robust and optimal controllers are proposed, validated, and compared on a quadrotor navigating an outdoor environment. First, a Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) combined with a PID is compared to a Type-1 FLC and Backstepping controller. Second, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) is proposed to provide the optimal PID-Type-2 FLC tuning. The Backstepping, PID-Type-1 FLC, and PID-Type-2 FLC with GA optimization are validated and evaluated with real scenarios in a windy environment. Deep robustness analysis, including error modeling, parameter uncertainties, and actuator faults, is considered. The obtained results clearly show the robustness of the optimal PID-Type-2 FLC compared to the Backstepping and PID-Type-1 FLC controllers. These results are confirmed by the numerical index of each controller compared to the PID-type-2 FLC, with 12% for the Backstepping controller and 51% for the PID-Type-1 FLC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>UAV classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Quadrotor configuration [<a href="#B18-sensors-24-06678" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Control architecture of the quadrotor [<a href="#B21-sensors-24-06678" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Global model proposed for controller system for quadrotor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Type-1 fuzzy logic controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Membership function of Type-1-FLC: (<b>a</b>) first input (e); (<b>b</b>) second input (de).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Model of membership function for Type-2 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Type-2 fuzzy logic controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Membership function of Type-2-FLC: (<b>a</b>) first input (e); (<b>b</b>) second input (de).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Quadrotor control scheme with GA optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Generic algorithm cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Architecture of optimization strategy for Type-1 FLC and Type-2 FLC using GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>GA optimization step diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Trajectory of simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Quadrotor commands of Backstepping control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Motor velocities of Backstepping control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p><span class="html-italic">x</span>, <span class="html-italic">y</span>, z errors evolution of Backstepping control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Quadrotor angles of Backstepping control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Quadrotor commands of Type-1 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Motor velocities of Type-1 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p><span class="html-italic">x</span>, <span class="html-italic">y</span>, z error evolution of Type-1 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Quadrotor angles of Type-1 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Quadrotor commands of Type-2 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Motor velocities of Type-2 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p><span class="html-italic">x</span>, <span class="html-italic">y</span>, z error evolution of Type-2 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Quadrotor angles of Type-2 FLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Quadrotor trajectory for proposed controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>The errors of X, Y, and Z position using the PID-Type-1 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Quadrotor angles of PID-Type-1 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Quadrotor commands of PID-Type-1 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Motor velocities of PID-Type-1 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>The errors of X, Y, and Z for the PID-Type-2 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>Quadrotor angles of PID-Type-2 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 34
<p>Quadrotor commands of PID-Type-2 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 35
<p>Motor velocities of PID-Type-2 FLC controller with GA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 36
<p>Quadrotor trajectory for PID-Type-1 FLC and PID-Type-2 FLC controllers with GA optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 37
<p>Wind velocity for scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 38
<p>Quadrotor trajectory for scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 39
<p>The errors of X, Y, and Z for PID-Type-2 FLC scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 40
<p>The errors of X, Y, and Z for PID FLC scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 41
<p>The errors of X, Y, and Z for Backstepping controller scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 2337 KiB  
Article
Comparative Evaluation of Traditional and Advanced Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems in Partial Shading Conditions
by Robert Sørensen and Lucian Mihet-Popa
Solar 2024, 4(4), 572-594; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4040027 - 8 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1251
Abstract
The optimization of photovoltaic (PV) systems is vital for enhancing efficiency and economic viability, especially under Partial Shading Conditions (PSCs). This study focuses on the development and comparison of traditional and advanced algorithms, including Perturb and Observe (P&O), Incremental Conductance (IC), Fuzzy Logic [...] Read more.
The optimization of photovoltaic (PV) systems is vital for enhancing efficiency and economic viability, especially under Partial Shading Conditions (PSCs). This study focuses on the development and comparison of traditional and advanced algorithms, including Perturb and Observe (P&O), Incremental Conductance (IC), Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), for efficient Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT). Simulations conducted in the MATLAB/Simulink software package evaluated these algorithms’ performances under various shading scenarios. The results indicate that, while traditional methods like P&O and IC are effective under uniform conditions, advanced techniques, particularly ANN-based MPPT, exhibit superior efficiency and faster convergence under PSCs. This study concludes that integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) into MPPT algorithms significantly enhances the reliability and efficiency of PV systems, paving the way for a broader adoption of solar energy technologies in diverse environmental conditions. These findings contribute to advancing renewable energy technology and supporting green energy transition. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Global energy production in 2022 [<a href="#B3-solar-04-00027" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The yearly PV installation, module PV production, and module production capacity during 2012–2022 (GW) [<a href="#B3-solar-04-00027" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Block diagram of the PV system components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Equivalent circuit of a PV cell [<a href="#B20-solar-04-00027" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Performance characteristics of a PV cell or module, as represented by the Current–Voltage (I-V) curve and the Power–Voltage (P-V) curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The I-V curve, P-V curve, and MPP [<a href="#B4-solar-04-00027" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of three-series PVs with bias diodes under PSC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>P-V curves for the PV under PSC with LMPP and GMPP showing the effect of a bias diode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Equivalent circuit of a three-series-connected PV with bias diodes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Block diagram of the simulation model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Three-series-connected PV modules with bias diodes connected to a converter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The I-V and P-V characteristics for the PV system illustrating the MPP under full solar irradiance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The I-V and P-V characteristics illustrating the GMPP for the PV system under Shading Scenario 2 (<b>a</b>), 3 (<b>b</b>), 4 (<b>c</b>), and 5 (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Block diagram of the MPPT algorithms using MATLAB function blocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Block diagram of the FLC algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Generated ANN Simulink block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Layers inside the ANN Simulink block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Block diagram of the ANN (1) MPPT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Block diagram of the ANN (2) MPPT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Solar irradiance (<b>a</b>) and temperature (<b>b</b>) data used for training ANN (1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Comparison of the maximum (<b>a</b>) and the average (<b>b</b>) power for Shading Scenario 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Comparison of the settling time (<b>a</b>) and MPPT efficiencies (<b>b</b>) for Shading Scenario 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Comparison of the maximum power (<b>a</b>) and the average power (<b>b</b>) for Shading Scenarios 2–5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Comparison of the settling time for Shading Scenarios 2–5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Comparison of the MPPT efficiencies for Shading Scenarios 2–5.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4688 KiB  
Article
A Coordinated Control Strategy for Efficiency Improvement of Multistack Fuel Cell Systems in Electric–Hydrogen Hybrid Energy Storage System
by Jianlin Li, Ce Liang and Zelin Shi
Batteries 2024, 10(9), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10090331 - 19 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1454
Abstract
A two-layer coordinated control strategy is proposed to solve the power allocation problem faced by electric–hydrogen hybrid energy storage systems (HESSs) when compensating for the fluctuating power of the DC microgrid. The upper-layer control strategy is the system-level control. Considering the energy storage [...] Read more.
A two-layer coordinated control strategy is proposed to solve the power allocation problem faced by electric–hydrogen hybrid energy storage systems (HESSs) when compensating for the fluctuating power of the DC microgrid. The upper-layer control strategy is the system-level control. Considering the energy storage margin of each energy storage system, fuzzy logic control (FLC) is used to make the initial power allocation between the battery energy storage system (BESS) and the multistack fuel cell system (MFCS). The lower-layer control strategy is the device-level control. Considering the individual differences and energy-storage margin differences of the single-stack fuel cell (FC) in an MFCS, FLC is used to make the initial power allocation of the FC. To improve the hydrogen-to-electricity conversion efficiency of the MFCS, a strategy for optimization by perturbation (OP) is used to adjust the power allocation of the FC. The output difference of the MFCS before and after the adjustment is compensated for by the BESS. The simulation and experiment results show that the mentioned coordinated control strategy can enable the HESS to achieve adaptive power allocation based on the energy storage margin and obtain an improvement in the hydrogen-to-electricity conversion efficiency of the MFCS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Electric–hydrogen coupled DC microgrid structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hydrogen–electric conversion efficiency curves of the FC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The two-layer control principle of the HESS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Membership functions for the power allocation of the HESS: (<b>a</b>) Membership function of <span class="html-italic">LoH</span><sub>mfcs</sub>; (<b>b</b>) Membership function of <span class="html-italic">SoC</span>; (<b>c</b>) Membership function of <span class="html-italic">k</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flow chart of OP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Membership functions for power allocation of the FC: (<b>a</b>) Membership function of <span class="html-italic">LoH<sub>i</sub></span>; (<b>b</b>) Membership function of <span class="html-italic">k</span>′<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulation results of Scenario 1: (<b>a</b>) Power of devices and bus voltage; (<b>b</b>) LoH of the FC<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Simulation results of Scenario 2: (<b>a</b>) Power of devices and bus voltage; (<b>b</b>) LoH of the FC<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Efficiency curve characteristics of the MFCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Results of the OP based on the FLC power allocation strategy: (<b>a</b>) Efficiency of MFCS and FC<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span> and bus voltage; (<b>b</b>) Power fluctuation of MFCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Results of OP based on the ED power allocation strategy: (<b>a</b>) Efficiency of MFCS and FC<sub><span class="html-italic">i</span></sub> and bus voltage; (<b>b</b>) Power fluctuation of MFCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Digital experimental platform with power allocation and efficiency optimization for electricity-hydrogen hybrid energy storage system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Results of the HIL experiment: (<b>a</b>) Voltage of FC<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span> and bus; (<b>b</b>) Current of FC<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2059 KiB  
Article
Intelligent Fuzzy Logic-Based Internal Model Control for Rotary Flexible Robots
by Omar Mohamed Gad, Raouf Fareh, Sofiane Khadraoui, Maamar Bettayeb and Mohammad Habibur Rahman
Processes 2024, 12(9), 1908; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091908 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1045
Abstract
Recently, there has been widespread and vital adoption of flexible manipulators due to their increased prevalence. This is attributed to the growing demand for flexibility in various tasks like refueling operations, inspections, and maintenance activities. Nevertheless, these robots are under-actuated systems characterized by [...] Read more.
Recently, there has been widespread and vital adoption of flexible manipulators due to their increased prevalence. This is attributed to the growing demand for flexibility in various tasks like refueling operations, inspections, and maintenance activities. Nevertheless, these robots are under-actuated systems characterized by a nonlinear behavior and present dynamic coupling interactions that contribute to the complexity of the control process. The main control objective is to achieve an accurate tracking of the desired position while simultaneously reducing oscillations occurring in the link. Therefore, this paper proposes integrating the tuning and adaptive control by employing fuzzy logic methodology in conjunction with internal model control (IMC). The suggested controller takes advantage of intelligent techniques, simple structure, robustness, and easy tuning of the conventional IMC. Both triangular and trapezoidal Membership Functions (MFs) are applied in this study to create a pair of Fuzzy Logic Controllers (FLCs) based on the Mamdani method. These controllers are employed to dynamically adjust the parameters of the IMC, in contrast to the fixed parameters used in the conventional IMC approach. The effectiveness of the suggested Adaptive-based Fuzzy IMC (AFIMC) is showcased through simulation and practical experimentation, in scenarios both with and without disturbances. Results indicate that this technique outperforms conventional IMC in achieving control objectives and rejecting disturbances. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Simulation of Robot Intelligent Control System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the RFJ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Block diagram of IMC for the RFJ robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Proposed FLC1: (<b>a</b>) inputs/output block diagram, (<b>b</b>) Fuzzy Logic Control surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FLC1 MFs for: (<b>a</b>) inputs, (<b>b</b>) output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Block diagram of AFIMC for RFJ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the absence of disturbances. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control under an impulse disturbance. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the presence of a white noise disturbance. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the presence of a <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mn>40</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> parameter variation. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Rotary Flexible Joint (RFJ) robot [<a href="#B38-processes-12-01908" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Full setup of RFJ robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the absence of a disturbance: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error, (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the presence of an impulse disturbance applied at t = 7 s: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error, (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the presence of a uniform random noise disturbance: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error, (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>IMC vs. AFIMC tracking control in the presence of a <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>20</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> parameter variation: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> tracking, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> error, (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> tracking.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 13002 KiB  
Article
A Robust Handover Optimization Based on Velocity-Aware Fuzzy Logic in 5G Ultra-Dense Small Cell HetNets
by Hamidullah Riaz, Sıtkı Öztürk and Ali Çalhan
Electronics 2024, 13(17), 3349; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13173349 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1098
Abstract
In 5G networks and beyond, managing handovers (HOs) becomes complex because of frequent user transitions through small coverage areas. The abundance of small cells (SCs) also complicates HO decisions, potentially leading to inefficient resource utilization. To optimize this process, we propose an intelligent [...] Read more.
In 5G networks and beyond, managing handovers (HOs) becomes complex because of frequent user transitions through small coverage areas. The abundance of small cells (SCs) also complicates HO decisions, potentially leading to inefficient resource utilization. To optimize this process, we propose an intelligent algorithm based on a method that utilizes a fuzzy logic controller (FLC), leveraging prior expertise to dynamically adjust the time-to-trigger (TTT), and handover margin (HOM) in a 5G ultra-dense SC heterogeneous network (HetNet). FLC refines TTT based on the user’s velocity to improve the response to movement. Simultaneously, it adapts HOM by considering inputs such as the reference signal received power (RSRP), user equipment (UE) speed, and cell load. The proposed approach enhances HO decisions, thereby improving the overall system performance. Evaluation using metrics such as handover rate (HOR), handover failure (HOF), radio link failure (RLF), and handover ping-pong (HOPP) demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm over existing approaches. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Proposed HetNet system model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>FLC basic structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Triangular and trapezoidal MFs, with red circles indicating key transition points a, b, c, and d, to highlight significant changes in the functions for clear visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Proposed velocity-aware FLC-based system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flowchart for the proposed algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Rules governing TTT and HOM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>TTT MFs for different speed sets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>HOM MF for all speed scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Average HOR (<b>a</b>) overall UEs versus UE speeds, (<b>b</b>) overall system, and (<b>c</b>) simulation time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Average HOF probability: (<b>a</b>) overall UEs versus UE speeds and (<b>b</b>) overall system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Average RLF probability: (<b>a</b>) overall UEs versus UE speeds and (<b>b</b>) overall system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Average HOPP probability for the methods under consideration across different scenarios: (<b>a</b>) for all UEs versus UE speed scenarios, (<b>b</b>) for the overall system, and (<b>c</b>) for all UEs versus simulation time.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop