[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,889)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = field plots

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
50 pages, 5064 KiB  
Systematic Review
Design, Algorithms, and Applications of Microstrip Antennas for Image Acquisition: Systematic Review
by Luis Fernando Guerrero-Vásquez, Nathalia Alexandra Chacón-Reino, Byron Steven Sigüenza-Jiménez, Felipe Tomas Zeas-Loja, Jorge Osmani Ordoñez-Ordoñez and Paúl Andrés Chasi-Pesantez
Electronics 2025, 14(6), 1063; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14061063 (registering DOI) - 7 Mar 2025
Abstract
This systematic literature review investigates microstrip antenna applications in image acquisition, focusing on their design characteristics, reconstruction algorithms, and application areas. We applied the PRISMA methodology for article selection. From selected studies, classifications were identified based on antenna patch geometry, substrate types, and [...] Read more.
This systematic literature review investigates microstrip antenna applications in image acquisition, focusing on their design characteristics, reconstruction algorithms, and application areas. We applied the PRISMA methodology for article selection. From selected studies, classifications were identified based on antenna patch geometry, substrate types, and image reconstruction algorithms. According to inclusion criteria, a significant increase in publications on this topic has been observed since 2013. Considering this trend, our study focuses on a 10-year publication range, including articles up to 2023. Results indicate that medical applications, particularly breast cancer detection, dominate this field. However, emerging areas are gaining attention, including stroke detection, bone fracture monitoring, security surveillance, avalanche radars, and weather monitoring. Our study highlights the need for more efficient algorithms, system miniaturization, and improved models to achieve precise medical imaging. Visual tools such as heatmaps and box plots are used to provide a deeper analysis, identify knowledge gaps, and offer valuable insights for future research and development in this versatile technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Microwave and Wireless Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA method scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Publication scheme of articles by year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of studies by countries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Article classification by geometry design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Types of antenna designs, including (<b>a</b>) Slot insertion, (<b>b</b>) Basic geometry, (<b>c</b>) Array antenna, (<b>d</b>) Slit insertion, (<b>e</b>) Vivaldi geometry, (<b>f</b>) Bowtie slot, (<b>g</b>) Fractal slot (<b>h</b>) Fractal array (<b>i</b>) Spiral (<b>j</b>) Bowtie Array. Each design has unique characteristics related to image adquisition applications. These are representative figures of antennas, intended as a visual reference for the design type, but not necessarily functional with the current dimensions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Article classification by substrates used in microstrip antennas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Article classification by image reconstruction algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Article classification by application type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Article classification by application type and antenna bandwidth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Article classification by application type and antenna operating frequency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Article classification by application type and antenna size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Article classification by reconstruction algorithms and antenna bandwidth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Article classification by reconstruction algorithms and antenna operating frequency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Article classification by reconstruction algorithm and antenna area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Standard deviation values of different dimensions of our review.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Article classification by application and image reconstruction algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Article classification by applications and frequency bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Article classification by applications and antenna geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Article classification by application and substrate.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Classification of frequency bands and image reconstruction algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Article classification by antenna geometry and frequency band.</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>Article classification by antenna geometry and substrate.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>Article classification by substrate and image reconstruction algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9
<p>Article classification by substrate and frequency band.</p>
Full article ">Figure A10
<p>Article classification by antenna geometry and image reconstruction algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2848 KiB  
Article
Detecting Changes in Soil Fertility Properties Using Multispectral UAV Images and Machine Learning in Central Peru
by Lucia Enriquez, Kevin Ortega, Dennis Ccopi, Claudia Rios, Julio Urquizo, Solanch Patricio, Lidiana Alejandro, Manuel Oliva-Cruz, Elgar Barboza and Samuel Pizarro
AgriEngineering 2025, 7(3), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7030070 - 6 Mar 2025
Abstract
Remote sensing is essential in precision agriculture as this approach provides high-resolution information on the soil’s physical and chemical parameters for detailed decision making. Globally, technologies such as remote sensing and machine learning are increasingly being used to infer these parameters. This study [...] Read more.
Remote sensing is essential in precision agriculture as this approach provides high-resolution information on the soil’s physical and chemical parameters for detailed decision making. Globally, technologies such as remote sensing and machine learning are increasingly being used to infer these parameters. This study evaluates soil fertility changes and compares them with previous fertilization inputs using high-resolution multispectral imagery and in situ measurements. A UAV-captured image was used to predict the spatial distribution of soil parameters, generating fourteen spectral indices and a digital surface model (DSM) from 103 soil plots across 49.83 hectares. Machine learning algorithms, including classification and regression trees (CART) and random forest (RF), modeled the soil parameters (N-ppm, P-ppm, K-ppm, OM%, and EC-mS/m). The RF model outperformed others, with R2 values of 72% for N, 83% for P, 87% for K, 85% for OM, and 70% for EC in 2023. Significant spatiotemporal variations were observed between 2022 and 2023, including an increase in P (14.87 ppm) and a reduction in EC (−0.954 mS/m). High-resolution UAV imagery combined with machine learning proved highly effective for monitoring soil fertility. This approach, tailored to the Peruvian Andes, integrates spectral indices and field-collected data, offering innovative tools to optimize fertilization practices, address soil management challenges, and merge modern technology with traditional methods for sustainable agricultural practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area, Santa Ana (Peru).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representation of the methodology employed in this investigation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Micasense Red Edge P camera, (<b>b</b>) CRP Panel, (<b>c</b>) Matrice 300 UAV integrated with multispectral sensor serving as the imaging platform used in this study, (<b>d</b>) flight plan for the study image, (<b>e</b>) DJI RTK V2 GNSS for marking soil plots, and (<b>f</b>) GCP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Survey regarding the addition of fertilizers (kg/ha) for the period 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variability (2022–2023) in soil parameters across different evaluation parameters: (<b>a</b>) nitrogen (N), (<b>b</b>) available phosphorus (P), (<b>c</b>) potassium (K), (<b>d</b>) organic matter (MO), (<b>e</b>) electrical conductivity (EC).</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 8278 KiB  
Article
Estimating Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Sequestration in Afforestation Areas Using Optical/SAR Data Fusion and Machine Learning
by Kashif Khan, Shahid Nawaz Khan, Anwar Ali, Muhammad Fahim Khokhar and Junaid Aziz Khan
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(5), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050934 - 6 Mar 2025
Abstract
The growing population and the impacts of climate change present a major challenge to forests, which play a crucial role in regulating the carbon cycle. Pakistan, as a Kyoto Protocol signatory, has implemented afforestation initiatives such as the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) government’s Billion [...] Read more.
The growing population and the impacts of climate change present a major challenge to forests, which play a crucial role in regulating the carbon cycle. Pakistan, as a Kyoto Protocol signatory, has implemented afforestation initiatives such as the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) government’s Billion Tree Afforestation Project (BTAP). Quantifying the environmental impacts of such initiatives is very important; however, carbon pool data for BTAP plantation regions remain unavailable and are underexplored. This study aims to quantify aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon sequestration potential (CSP) in the BTAP plantation regions using remote sensing and field data. Random sampling of 310 circular plots (17.84 m radius) provided measurements for tree height and diameter, from which AGB was calculated using allometric equations. Remote sensing data from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2, combined with polarization rasters and vegetation indices, were used to train and evaluate multiple regression models including multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR). The RFR model outperformed the others (R2 = 0.766) when using combined optical and radar data, yielding a mean AGB of 4.77 t/ha, carbon stock of 2.24 t/ha, and CO2 equivalent of 10.36 t/ha. For BTAP plantations, the total biomass reached 1.19 million tons, with 2.06 million tons of CO2 equivalent sequestered, corresponding to an annual sequestration of 0.47 t/ha/yr and a potential of 99.18 ± 15 t/ha. This research introduces innovative predictive models and a comprehensive carbon assessment framework for afforestation projects, providing critical insights for policymakers and climate change mitigation efforts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Maps of study area (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodology flowchart of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Training and testing data distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation between AGB and vegetation indices. The bottom triangle displays the correlation coefficients, the diagonal shows the distribution of each variable, and the top triangle presents their relationships in a scatterplot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Derived vegetation indices from Sentinel-2 imagery and VV and VH polarization bands of Sentinel-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatterplot showing the relationship, regression equation and R-square value between broadband, narrow red-edge band vegetation indices and aboveground biomass estimated through each equation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Scatterplots of actual vs. predicted biomass using optical and SAR data with (<b>a</b>) MLR, (<b>b</b>) SVR, and (<b>c</b>) RFR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatterplots of actual vs. predicted biomass using optical data with (<b>a</b>) MLR, (<b>b</b>) SVR, and (<b>c</b>) RFR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatterplots of actual vs. predicted biomass using SAR data with (<b>a</b>) MLR, (<b>b</b>) SVR, and (<b>c</b>) RFR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Training and testing data aboveground biomass (AGB) distribution of actual data and those observed from machine learning models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Aboveground biomass map of the study area plantation forests predicted using random forest regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Carbon sequestration potential of plantation sites using Winrock and carbon carrying capacity.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 8318 KiB  
Article
Timing and Duration of Drought Differentially Affect Growth and Yield Components Among Sugarcane Genotypes
by Amarawan Tippayawat, Sanun Jogloy, Nimitr Vorasoot, Nakorn Jongrungklang, Collins A. Kimbeng, John L. Jifon, Jidapa Khonghintaisong and Patcharin Songsri
Plants 2025, 14(5), 796; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050796 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 127
Abstract
Drought significantly impacts sugarcane yield, making drought resistance an important trait in drought-prone regions. The effects of the timing and duration of drought on yield and yield components, including relationships among these traits, were examined using a diverse set of sugarcane genotypes in [...] Read more.
Drought significantly impacts sugarcane yield, making drought resistance an important trait in drought-prone regions. The effects of the timing and duration of drought on yield and yield components, including relationships among these traits, were examined using a diverse set of sugarcane genotypes in a 2-year (planted cane and first ratoon) field study. Three drought treatments (no water stress (SD0), short-term (SD1), and long-term (SD2) drought) were assigned as the main plot and replicated four times. Within each plot, six genotypes were nested in a split-plot design. Drought reduced yield and its components, with the decline greater in SD2 than in SD1. Strong relationships between yield and its components like stalk height and density and height growth rate, especially under drought, make these traits potential surrogates for yield in drought screening experiments. The genotypes F03–362 and KK3 displayed high, stable yield potential across drought treatments, but KK3 lost potential in ratoon crop under drought. Although KK09–0358 displayed high yield potential, it was very sensitive to drought stress while UT12 and KK09–0939 displayed low yield potential and sensitivity to drought. TPJ04–768 displayed low but stable yield potential across drought treatments and crops. F03–362 and TPJ04–768 have utility in studies seeking to couple physiological with agronomic parameters promoting drought resistance and as parents for developing cultivars combining high and stable yield performance under drought. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Plant Defense Against Abiotic Stresses)
22 pages, 4665 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Forest Structural Parameter Extraction in the Greater Hinggan Mountains: Utilizing Airborne LiDAR and Species-Specific Tree Height–Diameter at Breast Height Models
by Shaoyi Chen, Wei Chen, Xiangnan Sun and Yuanjun Dang
Forests 2025, 16(3), 457; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030457 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 60
Abstract
Forests, being the largest and most intricate terrestrial ecosystems, play an indispensable role in sustaining ecological balance. To effectively monitor forest productivity, it is imperative to accurately extract structural parameters such as the tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH). Airborne LiDAR [...] Read more.
Forests, being the largest and most intricate terrestrial ecosystems, play an indispensable role in sustaining ecological balance. To effectively monitor forest productivity, it is imperative to accurately extract structural parameters such as the tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH). Airborne LiDAR technology, which possesses the capability to penetrate canopies, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in extracting these forest structural parameters. However, current research rarely models different tree species separately, particularly lacking comparative evaluations of tree height-DBH models for diverse tree species. In this study, we chose sample plots within the Bila River basin, nestled in the Greater Hinggan Mountains of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, as the research area. Utilizing both airborne LiDAR and field survey data, individual tree positions and heights were extracted based on the canopy height model (CHM) and normalized point cloud (NPC). Six tree height-DBH models were selected for fitting and validation, tailored to the dominant tree species within the sample plots. The results revealed that the CHM-based method achieved a lower RMSE of 1.97 m, compared to 2.27 m with the NPC-based method. Both methods exhibited a commendable performance in plots with lower average tree heights. However, the NPC-based method showed a more pronounced deficiency in capturing individual tree information. The precision of grid interpolation and the point cloud density emerged as pivotal factors influencing the accuracy of both methods. Among the six tree height-DBH models, a multiexponential model demonstrated a superior performance for both oak and ”birch–poplar” trees, with R2 values of 0.479 and 0.341, respectively. This study furnishes a scientific foundation for extracting forest structural parameters in boreal forest ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Inventory, Modeling and Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area and the field surveyed plots in Oroqen Autonomous Banner, HulunBuir City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Tree height-DBH correlation plots for all sample trees (<b>a</b>), oak trees (<b>b</b>) and “birch–poplar” trees (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The final results of DEM, DSM and CHM in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relative height normalization of airborne LiDAR point cloud data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Individual tree positions and tree height extraction using focal statistics based on CHM (taking plot 443 as an example). (<b>a</b>) is the initial CHM raster, (<b>b</b>) shows the focal statistics result, (<b>c</b>) shows the raster subtracting the focal statistics raster from the CHM, (<b>d</b>) shows the raster that assigned the CHM values from (<b>a</b>) to the tree tops in (<b>c</b>), (<b>e</b>) shows the raster after removing outliers and (<b>f</b>) shows the extracted individual tree positions as vector data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Individual tree positions extraction based on NPC (taking plot 443 as an example), the green triangles represent individual tree positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Scatter plots of tree height and diameter for oak trees. Each subplot corresponds to a different model (M1–M6). The dark blue lines indicate observed trends, with shaded areas denoting confidence intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots of tree height and diameter for “birch–poplar” trees. Each subplot corresponds to a different model (M1–M6). The dark blue lines indicate observed trends, with shaded areas denoting confidence intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plots of average tree height extracted from CHM and NPC versus field survey data.</p>
Full article ">
37 pages, 12886 KiB  
Article
From Source to Sink: U-Pb Geochronology and Lithochemistry Unraveling the Missing Link Between Mesoarchean Anatexis and Magmatism in the Carajás Province, Brazil
by Marco Antônio Delinardo-Silva, Lena Virgínia Soares Monteiro, Carolina Penteado Natividade Moreto, Jackeline Faustinoni, Ticiano José Saraiva Santos, Soraya Damasceno Sousa and Roberto Perez Xavier
Minerals 2025, 15(3), 265; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030265 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 185
Abstract
The connection between crustal anatexis and magmatism is key to understanding the mechanisms that drive the evolution of the continental crust. Isotope geology and lithochemistry are important tools for reconstructing links between these processes, as field evidence of their connection is often obliterated [...] Read more.
The connection between crustal anatexis and magmatism is key to understanding the mechanisms that drive the evolution of the continental crust. Isotope geology and lithochemistry are important tools for reconstructing links between these processes, as field evidence of their connection is often obliterated by deformation in high-grade terrains. Thus, this study proposes new insights into the connection between the Mesoarchean regional metamorphism, crustal anatexis, and plutonism in the northern sector of the Carajás Province (i.e., Carajás Domain), in the Amazonian Craton, around 2.89 to 2.83 Ga. The widespread crustal anatexis in the Carajás Domain involved the water-fluxed melting of banded orthogneisses of the Xingu Complex and Xicrim-Cateté Orthogranulite (crystallization age at ca. 3.06–2.93 Ga), producing metatexites and diatexites with stromatic, net, schollen, and schlieren morphologies and coeval syntectonic leucosomes with composition similar to tonalites, trondhjemites, and granites. These leucosomes yielded crystallization ages of 2853 ± 5 Ma (MSWD: 0.61), 2862 ± 13 Ma (MSWD: 0.1), and 2867 ± 7 Ma (MSWD: 1.3). Their lithochemical data are similar to those of several diachronous Mesoarchean granitoids of the Carajás Domain in terms of major, minor, and trace elements and magmatic affinity. In addition, binary log–log vector diagrams (e.g., La vs. Yb; Rb vs. Yb), Sr/Y vs. Y, and Eu/Eu* vs. Yb plots indicate that plagioclase fractionation preceded melt extraction, establishing evolving source-to-sink trends between leucosomes and granites. These results show that the interplay between high-grade metamorphism, crustal anatexis, and magmatism may have shaped the evolution of the Mesoarchean continental crust in the Carajás Province, developing a petrotectonic assemblage associated with collisional orogens. The Mesoarchean geodynamic setting played a critical role in the development of coeval ca. 2.89 Ga magmatic–hydrothermal copper deposits in the Carajás Province, as well as Neoarchean world-class iron oxide–copper–gold deposits linked to post-orogenic extensional rebound. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geochemistry and Geochronology of High-Grade Metamorphic Rocks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological map of the northern portion of the Carajás Province. The map highlights the position of the province in the Amazonian Craton and its subdivision into the Carajás (DC) and Rio Maria (RMD) domains, as shown in the inset figure in the upper right corner. Meaning of the numbers on the map: (1) Britamil quarry (lithochemistry samples: G1 to G7; J1 to J3; geochronology samples: G1 and J1; see the Figures 4C and 6A in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>); (2) Britalider quarry (geochronology sample A1; see the Figure 4A,B in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>); (3) lithochemistry sample location: SM36 L1 and L2 (see the <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>A in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>) and SM41L; (4) lithochemistry sample location: SM39N; (5) lithochemistry sample location: XS37L (see the <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>E in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>). Near key outcrop (see the Figure 6B in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>); (6) lithochemistry sample location: XS24L (see the Figure 4D in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>); (7) key outcrop (see the <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>B in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>); (8) key outcrop (see the <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>D in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>); (9) key outcrop (see the <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>C in the <a href="#sec4-minerals-15-00265" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>) (Modified from Costa et al. [<a href="#B34-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">34</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Migmatite morphologies: (<b>A</b>) patch morphology, characterized by spots of neosome with coarse-grained quartz, feldspar, and amphibole (site 2 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>B</b>) stromatic morphology, defined by parallel layers of neosome within the paleosome. The neosome is segregated into thick leucosome parts (~5 cm) and narrow biotite-bearing melanosome rims (near site 5 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) stromatic and net morphology, exemplified by interconnected leucosome that surrounds angular to lensoidal fragments of the paleosome and occurs in boudin necks (site 2 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) large diatexite outcrop, where schollen (So; (<b>E</b>)) and schlieren (Sl; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>)) morphologies can be observed (site 5 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Paleosome of the migmatites from the Xicrim-Cateté Orthogranulite (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) and Xingu Complex (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>). (<b>A</b>) Banded mafic granulite crosscut by discordant, white, coarse-grained leucosome (near site 3 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>B</b>) image showing the compositional banding and gneissic foliation of the diopside–enstatite orthogneiss (near site 4 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>C</b>) example of the complex geometric relationship between light-colored orthogneiss and dark mafic granulite in the diopside–enstatite orthogneiss (near site 3 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>D</b>) illustration of the spaced foliation in the biotite orthogneiss (near site 5 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>E</b>) image of the tabular compositional banding in the hornblende orthogneiss (site 7 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photomicrographs of the paleosome of the migmatites from the Xicrim-Cateté Orthogranulite (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) and Xingu Complex (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>). (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) The images show the polygonal fabric (<b>A</b>) and the rough foliation defined by pargasite crystals in the mafic granulite (<b>B</b>); (<b>C</b>) image of the interlobate fabric of the enstatite–diopside orthogneiss, illustrating the grain orientation that defines the gneissic foliation; (<b>D</b>) combination of a photomicrograph and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) ternary compositional map of Ca, Na, and K, showing the xenomorphic K-feldspar crystallized at the boundaries of quartz and plagioclase crystals in the enstatite–diopside orthogneiss; (<b>E</b>) illustration of the gneissic foliation defined by ribbon crystals of quartz, elongate crystals of plagioclase, biotite, and orthoclase in the biotite orthogneiss; (<b>F</b>) images of the xenomorphic crystals of plagioclase (upper) and microcline (lower), crystallized at the corners of orthoclase, plagioclase, and quartz crystals in the biotite orthogneiss; (<b>G</b>) example of the interlobate fabric of the dark band of the hornblende orthogneiss, with emphasis on the cuspate grains of quartz and plagioclase in the middle of hornblende crystals (the crystal on the right contains inclusions of apatite and quartz); (<b>H</b>) image of the polygonal fabric of the light band of the hornblende orthogneiss. Symbols for rock-forming minerals extracted from Warr [<a href="#B61-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">61</a>]. Abbreviations: Ap (apatite); Bt (biotite); Di (diopside); En (enstatite); Ep (epidote); Hbl (hornblende); Kfs (K-feldspar); Mcc (microcline); Or (orthoclase); Pl (plagioclase); Prg (pargasite); Qtz (quartz). Photomicrographs are under cross-polarized transmitted light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Neosome of the migmatites from the Xicrim-Cateté Orthogranulite (<b>A</b>,<b>E</b>) and Xingu Complex (<b>B</b>–<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>). (<b>A</b>) Example of the coarse-grained leucosome in the gray diopside–enstatite orthogneiss of the Xicrim-Cateté Orthogranulite (site 6 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) illustration of the white leucosome in the hornblende (<b>B</b>) and biotite (<b>C</b>) orthogneiss of the Xingu Complex (sites 2 and 8, respectively, in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>D</b>) image of the coarse-grained pink leucosome injected into a schollen diatexite (site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>E</b>) detail of the biotite-bearing melanosome surrounding the white leucosome in neosome layers of the diopside–enstatite orthogneiss (site 4 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>F</b>) view of the biotite-bearing melanosome observed in a stromatic metatexite (near site 5 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>G</b>) image of the hornblende-bearing melanosome detected in the schlieren diatexite (near site 5 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Photomicrographs of the neosome of the migmatites from the Xicrim-Cateté Orthogranulite (<b>A</b>,<b>E</b>) and Xingu Complex (<b>B</b>–<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>–<b>H</b>). (<b>A</b>) Detail of the leucosome layer (<a href="#minerals-15-00265-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>E) of the diopside–enstatite orthogneiss, showing plagioclase phenocrysts and a micrographic texture; (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) images of the leucosome layers showing idiomorphic crystals of plagioclase and microcline (<b>B</b>), and deformation features of large quartz crystals (<b>C</b>) of the white leucosome; (<b>D</b>) example of xenomorphic microcline crystals in the pink leucosome; (<b>E</b>) illustration of the biotite-bearing melanosome in the neosome layer shown in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>E, revealing interstitial quartz, biotite, and magnetite in the corners of plagioclase, as well as intergrowths of biotite and quartz at the boundaries of enstatite; (<b>F</b>) picture of the equigranular biotite-bearing melanosome in the migmatites of the Xingu Complex; (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) images of the hornblende-bearing melanosome showing idiomorphic crystals of hornblende being replaced by biotite (<b>G</b>), and the symplectitic texture developed between hornblende and quartz (<b>H</b>). Symbols for rock-forming minerals extracted from Warr [<a href="#B61-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">61</a>]. Abbreviations: Ap (apatite); Bt (biotite); Di (diopside); En (enstatite); Ep (epidote); Hbl (hornblende); Kfs (K-feldspar); Mcc (microcline); Or (orthoclase); Pl (plagioclase); Qtz (quartz). Photomicrographs were taken under cross-polarized light. One-wave quartz plate was used for photomicrograph D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Syntectonic granitoids. (<b>A</b>) Image showing the sharp contact between hercynite metadiorite and the Xingu Complex. The metadiorite is crosscut by pink leucosome injections; (<b>B</b>) illustration of the sharp intrusive contact between sheets of blasto-porphyritic metagranodiorite and gray orthogneiss of the Xingu Complex. The zoomed-in image highlights the oriented idiomorphic crystals of K-feldspar; (<b>C</b>) diffuse contact between orthogneiss of Xingu Complex and biotite granite (Schollen Diatexite); (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) biotite porphyritic granite pluton with foliated boundaries (<b>D</b>) and an isotropic core (<b>E</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Microstructure of the hercynite metadiorite (<b>A</b>) and biotite granite (<b>B</b>–<b>E</b>). (<b>A</b>) The image highlights relics of idiomorphic to subidiomorphic plagioclase crystals, surrounded by xenomorphic to subidiomorphic hercynite and hornblende. (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) Images illustrating the phenocrysts of orthoclase (<b>A</b>), microcline (<b>B</b>), and plagioclase (<b>C</b>), which define the porphyritic texture of the biotite granite; (<b>D</b>) the picture displays the alignment of idiomorphic grains of orthoclase, biotite, and epidote, as well as the occurrence of interstitial microcline near the boundary of the biotite granite; (<b>E</b>) the image emphasizes the sinuous foliation developed by subidioblastic biotite grains at the granitoid boundary, along with the folded and fractured plagioclase in the upper right and the lobate boundaries between two orthoclase crystals in the upper left. Symbols for rock-forming minerals extracted from Warr [<a href="#B61-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">61</a>]. Abbreviations: Ap (apatite); Bt (biotite); Chl (chlorite); Ep (epidote); Hbl (hornblende); Hc (hercynite); Mcc (microcline); Or (orthoclase); Pl (plagioclase); Qtz (quartz). Photomicrographs taken under transmitted and cross-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) Granite classification diagrams for white and pink leucosomes and the compiled samples of syntectonic granites. (<b>A</b>) Feldspar triangle of O’Connor [<a href="#B63-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">63</a>]; (<b>B</b>) K-Na-Ca ternary plot with calc-alkaline (CA) and trondhjemitic evolution lines; (<b>C</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. modified alkali–lime index [<a href="#B64-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; (<b>D</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Fe-index [<a href="#B64-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; (<b>E</b>) aluminum saturation index diagram based on Shand [<a href="#B65-minerals-15-00265" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; (<b>F</b>) multi-elementary rare earth element plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Log–log vector diagrams with amphibole, biotite, K-feldspar, and plagioclase vectors. (<b>C</b>) Eu/Eu* vs. Yb plot with plagioclase vector. The dashed line marks the limit between positive (Eu/Eu* &gt; 1) and negative (Eu/Eu* &lt; 1) Eu anomaly; (<b>D</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y plot with plagioclase vector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>CL images of zircon grains of the hercynite metadiorite ((<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>); sample 1H4; site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); the white leucosome of schlieren diatexite ((<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>); sample 3A1; site 2 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>), the white leucosome of schollen diatexite ((<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>); sample 1G1; site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); and pink leucosome ((<b>J</b>–<b>L</b>); sample 1J1; site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>). <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ages are indicated at the analyzed spots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p><sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U vs. <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>235</sup>U diagrams of zircons of the rocks analyzed by U–Pb LA-ICP-MS and zircon grains aspect under the magnifier for (<b>A</b>) hercynite metadiorite (sample 1H4; site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>B</b>) white leucosome of a schollen diatexite (sample 3A1; site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>C</b>) white leucosome of a schlieren diatexite (sample 1G1; site 2 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>); (<b>D</b>) pink leucosome that crosscut a schlieren diatexite (sample 1J1; site 1 in <a href="#minerals-15-00265-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3338 KiB  
Article
Screening of Pre- and Post-Emergence Herbicides for Weed Control in Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz
by Si-Zhe Dai, Yawen Wang, Min-Jung Yook, Hui-Zhen Wu, Min Chen and Chuan-Jie Zhang
Agronomy 2025, 15(3), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030640 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 109
Abstract
Weed management has been one of the major challenges in camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] production owing to the limited options for selective herbicides. The aim of this study was to evaluate and screen camelina-safe herbicides and establish an effective weed management [...] Read more.
Weed management has been one of the major challenges in camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] production owing to the limited options for selective herbicides. The aim of this study was to evaluate and screen camelina-safe herbicides and establish an effective weed management program combining pre- and post-emergence herbicide application in camelina. There were 22 herbicides (6 herbicides registered as pre- and 16 herbicides registered as post-emergence herbicides) with various modes of action tested in this study. Greenhouse evaluation showed that, of the 22 herbicides tested, post-application of s-metolachlor and prodiamine (registered as pre-emergence herbicide), and clethodim, fluazifop-p, clopyralid, and quinclorac (registered as post-emergence herbicide) possessed adequate safety (~×4 of recommended doses) when used on the two camelina genotypes (CamC1 and CamK3) by evaluation of plant visual efficacy, seed weight, and plant biomass yield per plant. Herbicides from the ALS (e.g., flumetsulam), HPPD (e.g., mesotrione), IPP (e.g., clomazone), PPO (e.g., oxyfluorfen), and PS II (e.g., bentazon) groups caused severe camelina growth suppression and mortality. Field evaluation with greenhouse-selected herbicides demonstrated the superior weed control efficacy of sequential application combining pre- (s-metolachlor) and post-emergence (clethodim, fluazifop-p, or clopyralid) herbicides (84–90% reduction in weed biomass in camelina plots relative to untreated control) than the single application of those herbicides (68–83%). Clethodim and fluazifop-p provided good post-emerged grass weed control (e.g., crabgrass), whereas clopyralid effectively controlled the broadleaf weeds, such as common vetch and shepherd’s purse. Camelina seed yields from s-metolachlor following clethodim, fluazifop-p, or clopyralid application were statistically comparable to the yield of the weed-free treatment (hand weeding) and were significantly greater than those of the untreated control, indicating the effective weed control efficacies provided by those herbicides. Sequential application of the above herbicides did not affect camelina seed oil content, the principal UFA concentrations (e.g., C18:1~3), UFA/SFA, and MUFA/PUFA. In summary, sequential application combining pre- (s-metolachlor) and post-emergence (clethodim, fluazifop-p, or clopyralid) herbicides shows effective weed control in camelina, thus providing a great opportunity to increase camelina production through herbicide-based weed management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Weed Science and Weed Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Greenhouse study for the evaluation of the effect of post-application of 22 herbicides at three application doses (×1, ×2, and ×4 of standard dose) on seed yield per plant (g) of CamC1 (<b>A</b>) and CamK3 (<b>B</b>), respectively. Of the 22 herbicides, 6 herbicides (e.g., oxyfluorfen, clomazone) are registered as pre-emergence herbicides, and the remaining 16 herbicides (e.g., bentazon, clethodim) are registered as post-emergence herbicides. The values reported are the mean of seed yield per plant (g) ± standard errors. Means with the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey post-hoc tests at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Greenhouse study for the evaluation of the effect of post-application of 22 herbicides at three application doses (×1, ×2, and ×4 of standard dose) on biomass yield per plant (g) of CamC1 (<b>A</b>) and CamK3 (<b>B</b>), respectively. Of the 22 herbicides, 6 herbicides (e.g., oxyfluorfen, clomazone) are registered as pre-emergence herbicides, and the remaining 16 herbicides (e.g., bentazon, clethodim) are registered as post-emergence herbicides. The values reported are the mean of biomass yield per plant (g) ± standard errors. Means with the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey post-hoc tests at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Weed control efficacy (% reduction in the untreated control) for CamK3 field plots treated with the screened herbicides (×1 of standard dose) in 2020–2021 (<b>A</b>) and 2021–2022 (<b>B</b>). Field herbicide treatments included the single pre-application of <span class="html-italic">s</span>-metolachlor and prodiamine, post-application of clethodim, fluazifop-<span class="html-italic">p</span>, clopyralid, and quinclorac, and sequential application combining <span class="html-italic">s</span>-metolachlor and post-emergence herbicides (clethodim, fluazifop-<span class="html-italic">p</span>, clopyralid, and quinclorac). The values reported are the mean of weed control efficacy ± standard errors. Means with the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey post-hoc tests at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Plant density at harvest (plant m<sup>−2</sup>) (<b>A</b>) and 1000-seed weight (g) (<b>B</b>) for CamK3 field plots treated with the screened herbicides (×1 of standard dose) during the two-year study of 2020–2022. Control groups included herbicide-untreated control and hand weeding (weed−free control) plots, respectively. Field herbicide treatments included the single pre-application of <span class="html-italic">s</span>-metolachlor and prodiamine, post-application of clethodim, fluazifop-<span class="html-italic">p</span>, clopyralid, and quinclorac, and sequential application combining <span class="html-italic">s</span>-metolachlor and post-emergence herbicides (clethodim, fluazifop-<span class="html-italic">p</span>, clopyralid, and quinclorac). The values reported are the mean of plant density or 1000-seed weight ± standard errors. Means with the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey post-hoc tests at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Seed yield ha<sup>−1</sup> (kg) (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and oil content (%) (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) for CamK3 field plots treated with the screened herbicides (×1 of standard dose) in 2020–2021 (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) and 2021–2022 (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>). Control groups included herbicide-untreated control and hand weeding (weed-free control) plots, respectively. Field herbicide treatments included the single pre-application of <span class="html-italic">s</span>-metolachlor and prodiamine, post-application of clethodim, fluazifop-<span class="html-italic">p</span>, clopyralid, and quinclorac, and sequential application combining <span class="html-italic">s</span>-metolachlor and post-emergence herbicides (clethodim, fluazifop-<span class="html-italic">p</span>, clopyralid, and quinclorac). The values reported are the mean of seed yield ha<sup>−1</sup> or oil content ± standard errors. Means with the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey post-hoc tests at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 9783 KiB  
Article
Integration of Routine Core Data and Petrographic Analyses to Determine the Sandstone Reservoir Flow Units in the Bredasdorp Basin, Offshore South Africa
by Nobathembu Tyhutyhani, Moses Magoba and Oswald Gwavava
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(3), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030493 - 2 Mar 2025
Viewed by 166
Abstract
Routine core permeability and porosity are crucial in assessing flow units within a reservoir because they define a reservoir’s storage and flow capacities. A limited amount of work has been conducted on the lower cretaceous (Barremian to Valanginian) sandstones in the Bredasdorp Basin, [...] Read more.
Routine core permeability and porosity are crucial in assessing flow units within a reservoir because they define a reservoir’s storage and flow capacities. A limited amount of work has been conducted on the lower cretaceous (Barremian to Valanginian) sandstones in the Bredasdorp Basin, offshore South Africa, focusing on the flow zones and the possible effect of diagenetic minerals on the individual flow zones, limiting understanding of reservoir quality and fluid flow behavior across the field. Nine hundred routine core analysis datasets were used to determine the flow units within the reservoir from three wells (F-A10, F-A13, and F-O2) from independent methods, namely: the Pore Throat Radius, Flow Zone Indicator, Stratigraphic Modified Lorenz Plot, and Improved Stratigraphic Modified Lorenz Plot. The results showed six flow units: fracture, super-conductive, conductor, semi-conductor, baffle, and semi-barrier. The super-conductive flow units contributed the most flow, whereas the semi-barrier and baffle units contributed the least flow. Petrography analyses revealed that the diagenetic minerals present were smectite, illite, glauconite, siderite, micrite calcite, and chlorite. The pore-filling minerals reduced the pore spaces and affected pore connectivity, significantly affecting the flow contribution of the baffle and semi-barrier units. Micrite calcite and siderite cementation in FU5 of F-A13 and FU9 of F-O2 significantly reduced the intergranular porosity by filling up the pore spaces, resulting in tight flow units with impervious reservoir quality. It was noted that where the flow unit was classified as super-conductive, authigenic clays did not significantly affect porosity and permeability as they only occurred locally. However, calcite and silica cementation significantly affected pore connectivity, where the flow unit was classified as a very low, tight, semi-barrier, or barrier. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Geological Oceanography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Maps displaying the location of the Bredasdorp Basin in South Africa and the selected wells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Core photographs of F-A10 at different depths. (<b>A</b>) Medium-grained, glauconitic sandstone with visible quartz, feldspar, and lithic fragments grains at a depth of 2719.37 m. (<b>B</b>) At the top of the core (2724.62 m), the light-grey colored sandstone is medium-grained with visible quartz, feldspar, and glauconite grain; it became fine-grained as the depth increased (from 2724.85 m). (<b>C</b>) Very fine-grained sandstone between 2733.12–2733.40 m. (<b>D</b>) Very fine-grained sandstone with visible lithic fragments from 2757.57–2758.03 m. (<b>E</b>) Claystone at 2770.80–2771.13 m with evidence of moderate bioturbation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Core photographs of F-A13 at different depths. (<b>A1</b>) Shows a glauconitic medium-grained sandstone with visible pore spaces. (<b>B1</b>) Medium-grained sandstone with visible glauconite, feldspar, and quartz. (<b>C1</b>) Sandstone texture that changed from medium-grained to fine-grained as the depth increased. The color of the core changed with increasing depth from light grey to dark grey. (<b>D1</b>) A claystone. (<b>A2</b>–<b>D2</b>) Are the side views of the core samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Core photographs of F-O2 at different depths. (<b>A</b>) Shows a parallel laminated greenish, dark-grey sandstone core sample with fine grains. Some minerals present included glauconite and clay. (<b>B</b>) Fine-grained sandstone with visible lithic fragments. (<b>C</b>) Fine-grained, light grey sandstone. (<b>D</b>) Fine-grained, dark grey sandstone with siderite cementation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calculated multi-well Windland r35 pore throat radius of five different petrophysical rock types (PRT1-5) displayed on the standard Windland porosity-permeability graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) The computed FZI utilized to distinguish various HFUs from an RQI vs. NPI multi-well plot. (<b>B</b>) A cross plot of permeability vs. porosity displaying various hydraulic flow units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Multi-Well SMLP of cumulative storage capacity against cumulative flow capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ISMLP of Well F-O2 displaying various flow units and their percentage flow contributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic Stratigraphic Flow Profile for Well F-O2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>ISMLP correlation panel of flow units of the studied wells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Thin section photomicrograph of F-A10 under cross-polarized light (images on the <b>left</b>) and plain polarized light (images on the <b>right</b>). Q = Quartz; F = Feldspar; G = Glauconite; S = Shale; Cm = Clay minerals; and IGP = Intergranular Pore Spaces, Siderite (blue arrow). The figures on the right (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>) represent plane-polarized light, and those on the left (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>) represent crossed-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>SEM images of F-A10 at various depths for each flow unit type. (<b>A</b>) Shows smectite (orange arrow) as a pore-filling mineral within large quartz grains (yellow arrow) at a depth of 2719.37 m. The pink arrows indicate intergranular pores. (<b>B</b>) Recrystallized smectite at a depth of 2758.30 m. (<b>C</b>) EDX graph showing the elemental composition of smectite, made of silica, aluminum, and magnesium at point one of <a href="#jmse-13-00493-f012" class="html-fig">Figure 12</a>B. (<b>D</b>) Authigenic quartz grains (yellow arrow) and illite growth (blue arrow) on smectite (orange arrow) at 2767.64 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Thin section photomicrograph of F-A13 under cross-polarized light (images on the <b>left</b>) and plain polarized light (images on the <b>right</b>). Q = Quartz; F = Felspar; Felspar overgrowth (red arrow); G = Glauconite; Cm = Clay minerals; Ca = Calcite cementation (Purple arrow); CS = Calcareous Sponge. The figures on the right (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>) represent plane-polarized light, and those on the left (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>I</b>) represent crossed-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SEM images of F-A13 at various depths for each flow unit type. (<b>A</b>) Intergranular pores (IGP) at a depth of 2613.78 m. (<b>B</b>) SEM of a tight flow unit showing smectite with large grains of authigenic quartz at a depth of 2648.82 m. (<b>C</b>) Recrystallized smectite (orange arrow) with well-rounded authigenic quartz grains (yellow arrow) at a depth of 2665.08 m. (<b>D</b>) The EDX spectrum shows the elemental composition of quartz, silica and oxygen at point two (orange and blue block) in <a href="#jmse-13-00493-f014" class="html-fig">Figure 14</a>C. (<b>E</b>) Smectite with large authigenic quartz grain (yellow arrow) at depth 2716.53 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Thin section photomicrograph of F-O2. Q = Quartz; Quartz overgrowth (yellow arrow) F = Felspar; Feldspar overgrowth (red arrow); G = Glauconite; Cm = Clay minerals; Si = Siderite (blue arrow); Lf = Lithic fragment. The figures on the right (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>L</b>,<b>N</b>,<b>P</b>,<b>R</b>) represent plane-polarized light, and those on the left (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>K</b>,<b>M</b>,<b>O</b>,<b>Q</b>) represent crossed-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Thin section photomicrograph of F-O2. Q = Quartz; Quartz overgrowth (yellow arrow) F = Felspar; Feldspar overgrowth (red arrow); G = Glauconite; Cm = Clay minerals; Si = Siderite (blue arrow); Lf = Lithic fragment. The figures on the right (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>L</b>,<b>N</b>,<b>P</b>,<b>R</b>) represent plane-polarized light, and those on the left (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>K</b>,<b>M</b>,<b>O</b>,<b>Q</b>) represent crossed-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>SEM images of F-O2 at various depths for each flow unit type. (<b>A</b>) Authigenic quartz grain (yellow block) on smectite flakes (yellow arrow) at depth 3627.73 m. (<b>B</b>) EDX spectrum illustrating elemental compositions of quartz at point one in (<b>A</b>). (<b>C</b>) Plagioclase transforming to illite (yellow block) at depth 3638.51 m. (<b>D</b>) EDX spectrum displaying elemental compositions of illite at point one in (<b>D</b>). (<b>E</b>) Smectite (yellow arrow) recrystallized to illite (blue arrow) at a depth of 3630.43 m. (<b>F</b>) Recrystallized smectite with a quartz grain (blue arrow) and the rose-shaped mineral could be chlorite (green arrow) at a depth of 3643.94 m. (<b>G</b>) Smectite (orange arrow) with large quartz grains (blue arrow) at a depth of 3660.32 m.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 11261 KiB  
Article
Subsoiling Before Wheat Sowing Enhances Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Maize in Dryland Winter Wheat and Summer Maize Double Cropping System Under One-Off Irrigation Practice During the Wheat Season
by Yanmin Peng, Kainan Zhao, Jun Zhang, Kaiming Ren, Junhao Zhang, Jinhua Guo, Rongrong Wang, Huishu Xiao, Peipei Jiang, Ninglu Xu, Ming Huang, Jinzhi Wu and Youjun Li
Plants 2025, 14(5), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050738 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 222
Abstract
The winter wheat and summer maize double cropping system is the primary cropping pattern for wheat and maize in dryland areas of China. The management of tillage in this system is typically conducted before wheat sowing. However, few studies have validated and quantified [...] Read more.
The winter wheat and summer maize double cropping system is the primary cropping pattern for wheat and maize in dryland areas of China. The management of tillage in this system is typically conducted before wheat sowing. However, few studies have validated and quantified the impact of tillage methods before wheat sowing and irrigation practices during the wheat season on the yield formation and water use efficiency of summer maize. Therefore, this study hypothesized that subsoiling before wheat sowing improves maize yield and WUE by enhancing soil moisture retention and plant development. A three-year field experiment with a two-factor split-plot design was conducted at the junction of the Loess Plateau and the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in China for validation, from 2019 to 2022. Three tillage methods before wheat sowing (RT: rotary tillage; PT: plowing, SS: subsoiling) were assigned to the main plots, and two irrigation practices during wheat growing season (W0: zero-irrigation; W1: one-off irrigation) were assigned to subplots. We measured the soil moisture, grain yield, dry matter accumulation, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulation, and water use efficiency of summer maize. The results indicated that subsoiling before wheat sowing increased soil water storage at the sowing of summer maize, thereby promoting dry matter and nutrient accumulation. Compared to rotary tillage and plowing, subsoiling before wheat sowing increased grain yield and water use efficiency of maize by an average of 19.5% and 21.8%, respectively. One-off irrigation during the wheat season had negative effects on pre-sowing soil water storage and maize productivity in terms of yield and dry matter accumulation. However, subsoiling before wheat sowing can mitigate these negative effects of one-off irrigation. Correlation analysis and path model results indicated that tillage methods before wheat sowing had a greater impact on soil water storage and maize productivity than irrigation practices during wheat growing season. The most direct factor affecting maize yield was dry matter accumulation, whereas the most direct factor affecting water use efficiency was nutrient accumulation. The technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) comprehensive evaluation indicated that subsoiling before wheat sowing was superior for achieving high maize yield and water use efficiency under the practice of one-off irrigation during the wheat season. These findings offer practical guidance for optimizing soil water use and maize productivity in drylands. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of tillage methods before wheat sowing and irrigation practices during the wheat season on soil water storage in each soil layer (<b>A</b>) and total soil water storage in the 0–200 cm layer (<b>B</b>) before maize sowing. RT, PT, and SS represent rotary tillage, plowing, and subsoiling before wheat sowing, respectively. W0 and W1 represent zero-irrigation and one-off irrigation practice during the wheat season, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of tillage methods before winter wheat sowing and irrigation practices during the wheat season on the dry matter accumulation of maize in 2020, 2021, 2022 and the three-year average. Note: RT, PT, and SS represent rotary tillage, plowing, and subsoiling before wheat sowing, respectively. W0 and W1 represent zero-irrigation and one-off irrigation during the wheat season, respectively. Different lowercase letters within the same organ indicate significant differences among treatments for organ dry matter accumulation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments for above-ground dry matter accumulation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of tillage methods before wheat sowing and irrigation practices during the wheat season on N, P and K accumulation of summer maize. Note: RT, PT, and SS represent rotary tillage, plowing, and subsoiling before wheat sowing, respectively. W0 and W1 represent zero-irrigation and one-off irrigation practice during the wheat season, respectively. Different lowercase letters within the same organ indicate significant differences among treatments for organ N, P and K accumulation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments for above-ground N, P and K accumulation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationships among the SWS, grain yield, yield components, dry matter accumulation, nutrient accumulation, and water use efficiency under the combination of tillage methods before wheat sowing and irrigation practices during the wheat season (<b>A</b>); tillage methods before wheat sowing (<b>B</b>) and irrigation practices during the wheat season (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Partial least squares path model (<b>A</b>), standardized total effects on grain yield (<b>B</b>), and water use efficiency (<b>C</b>) based on the model. Note: Path coefficients were calculated after 1000 bootstrap repetitions and are reflected by the width of the arrows, with blue and red indicating positive and negative effects, respectively. The model was evaluated using the goodness-of-fit statistic, and its value was 0.72. * Indicates significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Location (<b>A</b>) and precipitation (<b>B</b>) of the experimental field in 2020–2022.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 590 KiB  
Article
Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Foliar-Applied Nanoparticles of Zinc Oxide and Manganese Oxide Under Drought Stress
by Perumal Kathirvelan, Sonam Vaishnavi, Venkatesan Manivannan, M. Djanaguiraman, S. Thiyageshwari, P. Parasuraman and M. K. Kalarani
Plants 2025, 14(5), 732; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050732 - 27 Feb 2025
Viewed by 123
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important crop grown for food, feed, and energy. In general, maize yield is decreased due to drought stress during the reproductive stages, and, hence, it is critical to improve the grain yield under drought. A field [...] Read more.
Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important crop grown for food, feed, and energy. In general, maize yield is decreased due to drought stress during the reproductive stages, and, hence, it is critical to improve the grain yield under drought. A field experiment was conducted with a split-plot design. The main factor was the irrigation regime viz. well-irrigated conditions and withholding irrigation from tasseling to grain filling for 21 days. The subplots include six treatments, namely, (i) the control (water spray), (ii) zinc oxide @ 100 ppm, (iii) manganese oxide @ 20 ppm, (iv) nZnO @ 100 ppm + nMnO @ 20 ppm, (v) Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) Nano Revive @ 1.0%, and (vi) zinc sulfate 0.25% + manganese sulfate 0.25%. During drought stress, the anthesis–silking interval (ASI), chlorophyll a and b content, proline, starch, and carbohydrate fractions were recorded. At harvest, the grain-filling rate and duration, per cent green leaf area, and yield traits were recorded. Drought stress increased the proline (38.1%) and anthesis–silking interval (0.45 d) over the irrigated condition. However, the foliar application of ZnO (100 ppm) and nMnO (20 ppm) lowered the ASI and increased the green leaf area, leaf chlorophyll index, and proline content over water spray. The seed-filling rate (17%), seed-filling duration (11%), and seed yield (19%) decreased under drought. Nevertheless, the seed-filling rate (90%), seed-filling duration (13%), and seed yield (52%) were increased by the foliar spraying of nZnO (100 ppm) and nMnO (20 ppm) over water spray. These findings suggest that nZnO and nMnO significantly improve the grain yield of maize under drought stress conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials on Plant Growth and Stress Adaptation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Weather data recorded during winter 2024 and summer 2024 seasons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil moisture (%) recorded at 15 cm depth during the cropping period (Summer 2024).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 13571 KiB  
Article
Geochemistry and U–Pb Chronology of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Southern Ordos Basin, China: Implications for Provenance and Geological Setting
by Fenhong Luo, Hujun Gong, Hang Liu, Bin Lv and Dali Xue
Minerals 2025, 15(3), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030233 - 26 Feb 2025
Viewed by 196
Abstract
During the deposition of the Middle–Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, the southern margin of the Ordos Basin (OB) serves as a critical area for investigating the tectonic interactions between the North China Block (NCB) and Qinling Orogenic Belt (QOB). The provenance record of this [...] Read more.
During the deposition of the Middle–Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, the southern margin of the Ordos Basin (OB) serves as a critical area for investigating the tectonic interactions between the North China Block (NCB) and Qinling Orogenic Belt (QOB). The provenance record of this sedimentary succession can be utilized to trace basin–mountain interactions using petrological, geochemical, and zircon age geochronological studies. We analyzed lithic fragments, geochemistry, and detrital zircon U–Pb ages of samples from the Xunyi Sanshuihe field profile, Weibei Uplift. Discrimination diagrams of major and trace elements revealed provenances and tectonic-sedimentary settings. Middle–Upper Triassic sandstones comprise quartz, feldspar, and lithic fragments. Their compositions are plotted within recycled orogenic and magmatic arc provenance fields. Multiple element diagrams reveal a felsic igneous rock provenance. Detrital zircon age spectra display four prominent age groups, which are ca. 240–270, 410–450, 1800–2200, and 2400–2600 Ma, and one minor age group, that is, 870–1197 Ma in the Late Triassic sample. We conclude that the provenance of the Yanchang Formation changed significantly during the Middle–Late Triassic. The Late Triassic sediments were mainly QOB-derived, and the basement was from the NCB. The pre-Triassic strata and Longmen pluton in the southwest of OB were the provenance of Middle Triassic sediments. The QOB suffered rapid uplift and denudation, resulting in rapid deposition and deep-water deposition in the southern OB, which provides excellent conditions for the high-quality oil shale of Ch 7. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location and main tectonic units of the Ordos Bain are aligned with the sample location (modified after Yang et al. [<a href="#B19-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">19</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified stratigraphic histogram of the Yanchang Formation in Sanshuihe outcrop, Xunyi City (modified after Li et al. [<a href="#B20-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">20</a>], the color of the lithology column refers to the color of the sedimentary rocks).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field outcrop photos of the Sanshuihe profile, Xunyi city, with sample locations (yellow stars). The red line is the dividing line between the different members. (<b>a</b>) gray-green sandstone, Ch 6 member; (<b>b</b>) grey-white sandstone with oil shale in Ch 7 member and grey sandstone in Ch 8 member; (<b>c</b>) grey sandstone mudstone interlayer in top of Ch 9 member and sandstone in bottom of Ch 8 member; (<b>d</b>) “Zhangjiatan” oli shale in Ch 7 member.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Thin section photomicrographs (cross-polarized) of the sampling horizons of Yanchang Formation sandstones (Kfs: K-feldspar, Ms: muscovite, Qz: quartz, Bt: biotite, Pl: plagioclase, Cal: calcite, Lv: volcanic lithic grains, Lm: metamorphic lithic grains, Ls: sedimentary lithic grains).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Classification of sandstones from Garzanti [<a href="#B22-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">22</a>] and (<b>b</b>) classification of provenance types from Dickinson et al. [<a href="#B23-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Typical CL and U–Pb ages of detrital zircon grains with the analysis location (white circle) from the Yanchang Formation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>U–Pb concordia diagrams with Th/U ratios (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) and the histograms, showing the probability distribution of the age of detrital zircons (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) UCC-normalized trace elements diagram and (<b>b</b>) chondrite-normalized REE diagram for mudstone from the southern OB. UCC values were obtained from Taylor et al. [<a href="#B25-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">25</a>], and chondrite values were adopted from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B26-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Source rock classification diagrams for Triassic mudstones. (<b>a</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> versus TiO<sub>2</sub> (after Hayashi et al. [<a href="#B28-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">28</a>]), (<b>b</b>) Th/Sc versus Zr/Sc (after Mongelli et al. [<a href="#B31-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">31</a>]), (<b>c</b>) La/Th versus Hf (after Floyd and Leveridge, [<a href="#B32-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">32</a>]) and (<b>d</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub> versus Ni (after Floyd et al. [<a href="#B33-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">33</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Age spectrum and the histograms, showing the probability distribution of zircon from previous studies. (<b>a</b>) The late Triassic data are from Sun et al. [<a href="#B15-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B16-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">16</a>], and (<b>b</b>) the middle Triassic are from Xie [<a href="#B6-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B7-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">7</a>] and Zhang et al. [<a href="#B17-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Igneous rock U–Pb age distribution of the potential provenance of the southern OB (data sources: see text). Igneous zircon age distributions for Qilian orogeny (<b>a</b>), Qiling Orogen (<b>b</b>), and North China Block (<b>h</b>), detrital zircon age distributions of this study (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>), and pre-Triassic strata (<b>g</b>) (obtained from Li et al. [<a href="#B51-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">51</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Discrimination diagrams of the tectonic setting for the Yanchang Formation provenance area in the southern OB. (<b>a</b>) La–Th–Sc ternary plot, (<b>b</b>) Th–Sc–Zr/10 ternary plot, (<b>c</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O/Na<sub>2</sub>O–SiO<sub>2</sub> cross-plot, and (<b>d</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–K<sub>2</sub>O/Na<sub>2</sub>O cross-plot (after [<a href="#B29-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B59-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">59</a>,<a href="#B60-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">60</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Cumulative probability curves of detrital zircons for different basin settings (after Cawood et al. [<a href="#B54-minerals-15-00233" class="html-bibr">54</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 225 KiB  
Article
Response of Winter Wheat to 35-Year Cereal Monoculture
by Andrzej Woźniak and Małgorzata Haliniarz
Agriculture 2025, 15(5), 489; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050489 - 25 Feb 2025
Viewed by 211
Abstract
A field experiment aimed to evaluate grain yield and grain quality of winter wheat cultivated in a 35-year cereal monoculture and three soil tillage systems (TSs). Winter wheat grown in the plot after common pea (PS) served as the control. In the monoculture [...] Read more.
A field experiment aimed to evaluate grain yield and grain quality of winter wheat cultivated in a 35-year cereal monoculture and three soil tillage systems (TSs). Winter wheat grown in the plot after common pea (PS) served as the control. In the monoculture (MON) and on PS plots, winter wheat was sown in the conventional (CT), reduced (RT), and no-tillage (NT) systems. In the CT system, shallow plowing was applied after the previous crop harvest, followed by pre-sow plowing. In the RT system, a cultivator was used, and the pre-sow plowing was replaced with a pre-sowing set. In turn, in the NT system, the soil was treated with glyphosate and cultivated using a pre-sowing cultivation set. Winter wheat produced over 2-fold higher grain yield on the PS plot than in the MON as well as in the CT than in the RT and NT systems. In turn, the plant number after emergence was differentiated only by the cropping system (CS). On the PS plots, the number of plants after emergence was 15.6% higher, and the spike number was 50.5% higher than on the MON plots. Also, more spikes per m2 were found on the CT than on the RT and NT plots. Similarly, the grain weight per spike and the 1000 grain weight were higher on the PS plots compared to the MON plots as well as in the CT than in the RT and NT systems. The evaluation of the variance analysis components shows that the grain yield, plant number after emergence, spike number, grain number per spike, and 1000 grain weight were more strongly influenced by CS than by TS. Grain quality, expressed by the contents of total protein, wet gluten, and starch, as well as by Zeleny’s sedimentation index and grain uniformity index, were affected to a greater extent by CS than TS and reached higher values in the grain harvested from the PS plot compared to MON. Full article
15 pages, 3579 KiB  
Article
Fate of Fertilizer Nitrogen in the Field 2 Years After Biochar Application
by Lining Zhao, Weijun Yang, Zi Wang, Jinshan Zhang, Liyue Zhang, Mei Yang, Xiangrui Meng and Lei Ma
Plants 2025, 14(5), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050682 - 23 Feb 2025
Viewed by 139
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify the scientific quantification of fertilizer nitrogen (N) uptake and utilization, its destination, and its residual distribution in the soil at a depth of 0–30 cm after biochar application using 15N tracer technology. The purpose was to provide [...] Read more.
This study aimed to clarify the scientific quantification of fertilizer nitrogen (N) uptake and utilization, its destination, and its residual distribution in the soil at a depth of 0–30 cm after biochar application using 15N tracer technology. The purpose was to provide a theoretical basis for developing a scientific application strategy for N fertilizer and biochar in irrigated farmland areas. Two levels of N fertilizer application were set up using the 15N labeling method in microareas of large fields: the regular amount of N fertilizer (N1: 300 kg·ha−1) and a reduction of N fertilizer by 15% (N2: 255 kg·ha−1). Further, three levels of biochar application were set up: no biochar (B0: 0 kg·ha−1), a low amount of biochar (B1: 10 × 103 kg·ha−1), and a medium amount of biochar (B2: 20 × 103 kg·ha−1). The tested biochar was derived from corn stover (maize straw). The natural abundance of 15N-labeled fertilizer N, the total N content of each aboveground organ, and the total N content of soil at a depth of 0–30 cm in a spring wheat field at maturity were determined, and the yield was measured in the corresponding plots. The proportion of 15N-labeled fertilizer N uptake by each organ of spring wheat and the soil N uptake was 20.60–35.32% and more than 64.68%, respectively. Moreover, the proportion of soil N uptake showed a decreasing trend with an increase in biochar application. The spring wheat N uptake and utilization rate, the residue rate in the soil at a depth of 0–30 cm, the total utilization rate, and the rate of loss of 15N-labeled fertilizer N ranged from 15.21% to 29.61%, 23.33% to 28.93%, 38.54% to 58.54%, and 41.46% to 61.46%, respectively. The spring wheat N fertilizer utilization rate, fertilizer N residue rate in soil, and total fertilizer N utilization rate all increased gradually with an increase in biochar application, except for the N loss rate, which decreased gradually. When N fertilizer reduction was combined with medium biochar (B2N2), the yield of spring wheat significantly improved, mainly due to an increase in the number of grains in spikes. Under this treatment, the number of grains in spikes of spring wheat was 41.9, and the yield reached 7075.54 kg·ha−1, which was an increase of 9.69–28.25% and 10.91–25.35%, respectively, compared with other treatments. Yield increased by up to 25.35%, and nitrogen loss decreased by 48.24% under the B2N2 treatment. Biochar application could promote the amount and proportion of fertilizer N uptake in various organs of spring wheat as well as in the soil at a depth of 0–30 cm. In this study, a 15% reduction in N fertilizer (255 kg·ha−1) combined with 20 × 103 kg·ha−1 biochar application initially helped achieve the goal of increasing spring wheat yield and N fertilizer uptake, as well as improving fertilizer N utilization, providing an optimal scientific application strategy for N fertilizer and biochar in the farmland of the irrigation area. These results substantiate the hypothesis that biochar application enhances spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) assimilation of fertilizer-derived nitrogen (15N) while concomitantly improving fertilizer nitrogen retention in the soil matrix, which could provide a sustainable framework for nitrogen management in irrigated farmlands. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Nitrogen accumulation in aboveground organs of plants at maturity stage. Note: Different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among the treatments of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer application, while the same letters indicate no significant differences among the treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><sup>15</sup>N abundance in aboveground organs of spring wheat plants at maturity stage. Note: Different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among the treatments of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer application, while the same letters indicate no significant differences among the treatments, which is the same as below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Absorption proportion of <sup>15</sup>N-labeled fertilizer N and soil N in plant at maturity stage (%). Different N fertilizer sources for (<b>a</b>) stem + leaf sheath, (<b>b</b>) leaf, (<b>c</b>) pin shell + rachis, and (<b>d</b>) kernel. Different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among the treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Absorption and utilization of <sup>15</sup>N-labeled fertilizer N by aboveground organs of spring wheat. The fertilizer N uptake and utilization rate of (<b>a</b>) stem + leaf sheath, (<b>b</b>) of leaf, (<b>c</b>) pin shell + rachis, and (<b>d</b>) kernel. Different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among the treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of combined application of carbon and N on soil fertilizer <sup>15</sup>N abundance, soil total N content, and soil residue amount.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Fate of fertilizer N. (<b>a</b>) Utilization rate of <sup>15</sup>N-labeled fertilizer N of plants and soil. (<b>b</b>) Total recovery rate and loss rate of <sup>15</sup>N. Different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among the treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spring wheat yield.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Analysis of the relationships between yield and N content of the plant, N absorption of plant fertilizer, and N loss rate. Different colors in the figure indicate whether the correlation between different indicators is significant, where “*” indicates a weak correlation; ** indicates moderately relevant. “***” indicates strong correlation; “****” is very relevant. The <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value is used to test whether the correlation is significant. The meaning is as follows: the red line is 0.001 &lt; x ≤ 0.01, indicating a very significant correlation; The dark blue line indicates 0.01 &lt; x ≤ 0.05, indicating a significant correlation; The sky blue line is x &gt; 0.05, indicating no significant correlation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Microarea diagram.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3556 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Nano and Conventional Zinc and Silicon Fertilizers for Nutrient Use Efficiency and Yield Benefits in Maize Under Saline Field Conditions
by Abbas Shoukat, Uswah Maryam, Britta Pitann, Muhammad Mubashar Zafar, Allah Nawaz, Waseem Hassan, Mahmoud F. Seleiman, Zulfiqar Ahmad Saqib and Karl H. Mühling
Plants 2025, 14(5), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050673 - 22 Feb 2025
Viewed by 295
Abstract
The increasing severity of salinity stress, exacerbated by climate change, poses significant challenges to sustainable agriculture, particularly in salt-affected regions. Soil salinity, impacting approximately 20% of irrigated lands, severely reduces crop productivity by disrupting plants’ physiological and biochemical processes. This study evaluates the [...] Read more.
The increasing severity of salinity stress, exacerbated by climate change, poses significant challenges to sustainable agriculture, particularly in salt-affected regions. Soil salinity, impacting approximately 20% of irrigated lands, severely reduces crop productivity by disrupting plants’ physiological and biochemical processes. This study evaluates the effectiveness of zinc (Zn) and silicon (Si) nanofertilizers in improving maize (Zea mays L.) growth, nutrient uptake, and yield under both saline and non-saline field conditions. ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized via the co-precipitation method due to its ability to produce highly pure and uniform particles, while the sol–gel method was chosen for SiO2 NPs to ensure precise control over the particle size and enhanced surface activity. The NPs were characterized using UV-Vis spectroscopy, XRD, SEM, and TEM-EDX, confirming their crystalline nature, morphology, and nanoscale size (ZnO~12 nm, SiO2~15 nm). A split-plot field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of the nano and conventional Zn and Si fertilizers. Zn was applied at 10 ppm (22.5 kg/ha) and Si at 90 ppm (201 kg/ha). Various agronomic, chemical, and physiological parameters were then evaluated. The results demonstrated that nano Zn/Si significantly enhanced the cob length and grain yield. Nano Si led to the highest biomass increase (110%) and improved the nutrient use efficiency by 105% under saline and 110% under non-saline conditions compared to the control. Under saline stress, nano Zn/Si improved the nutrient uptake efficiency, reduced sodium accumulation, and increased the grain yield by 66% and 106%, respectively, compared to the control. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlighted a strong correlation between nano Zn/Si applications with the harvest index and Si contents in shoots, along with other physiological and yield attributes. These findings highlight that nanotechnology-based fertilizers can mitigate salinity stress and enhance crop productivity, providing a promising strategy for sustainable agriculture in salt-affected soils. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effect of different sources of silicon and zinc on agronomic parameters under non-saline and saline conditions. (<b>a</b>) Plant height, (<b>b</b>) Tassel length, (<b>c</b>) Cob length, and (<b>d</b>) Number of cobs. Error bars represent standard error (SE), and different letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments based on LSD test after ANOVA (α = 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effect of different sources of silicon and zinc on chemical parameters under non-saline and saline conditions. (<b>a</b>) Na<sup>+</sup> in shoot (mg kg<sup>−1</sup> DW), (<b>b</b>) K<sup>+</sup> shoot (mg kg<sup>−1</sup> DW), (<b>c</b>) Zn in shoot (mg/kg), (<b>d</b>) Si in shoot (mg/kg) DW, (<b>e</b>) Zn in grain (mg/kg) and (<b>f</b>) Si in grain (mg/g) DW. Error bars represent standard error (SE), and different letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments based on LSD test after ANOVA (α = 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of different sources of silicon and zinc on nutrient use efficiency and productivity parameters under non-saline and saline conditions. (<b>a</b>) Zn use efficiency (<b>b</b>) Si use efficiency (<b>c</b>) Harvest Index and (<b>d</b>) Partial factor productivity. Error bars represent standard error (SE), and different letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments based on LSD test after ANOVA (α = 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of different sources of silicon and zinc on yield parameters under non-saline and saline conditions. (<b>a</b>) Grain Yield (kg/ha), (<b>b</b>) Straw Yield (kg/ha), (<b>c</b>) Biological Yield (kg/ha), and (<b>d</b>) 100 grain Weight (g). Error bars represent standard error (SE), and different letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments based on LSD test after ANOVA (α = 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effect of different zinc and silicon treatments on agronomic traits under non-saline and saline conditions based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The color scale (cos2) indicates variable representation in PCA space, with higher values (red/orange) showing better representation and lower values (blue/green) indicating weaker contribution. The parameters include salinity stress (Sal), conventional (Conv), control (Con), nutrient use efficiency (NUE), grain yield (GY), tassel length (TL), shoot yield (SY), 100-grain weight (100 GW), cob length (CL), plant height (PH), partial factor productivity (PFP), cob diameter (CD), number of leaves (N Leaves), and biological yield (BY).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Heat map of the effect of different zinc and silicon treatments on agronomic traits under non-saline and saline conditions. The parameters include salinity stress (Sal), conventional (Conv), control (Con), nutrient use efficiency (NUE), grain yield (GY), tassel length (TL), shoot yield (SY), 100-grain weight (100 GW), cob length (CL), plant height (PH), partial factor productivity (PFP), cob diameter (CD), number of leaves (N Leaves), and biological yield (BY).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Visual representation of maize cobs subjected to different salinity levels (non-saline and saline) and nano and conventional Zn and Si treatments.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8243 KiB  
Article
A Study on Improved Langley Plot Calibration Methods Using Noise Reduction for Field Solar Spectral Irradiance (SSI) Observation Instruments
by Guanrui Li, Aiming Zhou, Yu Huang, Xiaohu Yang and Zhanfeng Li
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(5), 754; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050754 - 22 Feb 2025
Viewed by 260
Abstract
Accurate spectral and radiometric calibration is critical for precise Solar Spectral Irradiance (SSI) and Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) retrievals in ground-based observations. This study introduces a pixel-based real-time noise deduction method and evaluates its performance using laser sources, Fraunhofer dark lines, and an [...] Read more.
Accurate spectral and radiometric calibration is critical for precise Solar Spectral Irradiance (SSI) and Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) retrievals in ground-based observations. This study introduces a pixel-based real-time noise deduction method and evaluates its performance using laser sources, Fraunhofer dark lines, and an improved Langley plot calibration. The proposed approach addresses challenges in long-term field SSI monitoring, including spectral noise variation and frequent calibration requirements for wavelength and responsivity corrections. The pixel-based noise deduction method effectively suppresses spectral dark noise to 0 ± 0.890, outperforming temperature-based corrections by 0.6%. Wavelength accuracy tests with laser sources and Fraunhofer dark lines demonstrate high consistency, with δλ < 0.3 nm, while spectral calibration uncertainty is assessed at 0.195 nm to 0.299 nm. The improved Langley plot achieves spectral responsivity differing by only 0.80% from the standard Langley plot and enhances AOD correlation with CE318 by 0.9–2.7% (RMSE: 0.002–0.003), significantly improving AOD observation accuracy. This work advances the development of field SSI hyperspectral observation and calibration, improving the accuracy of SSI and AOD measurements and contributing to the study of environmental changes and climate dynamics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>On-site images of GSSIM at Changchun and Lijiang. (<b>a</b>) Changchun; (<b>b</b>) Lijiang.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic Diagram of the Normalized Spectral Response Function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of Spectral and Radiometric Calibration for SSI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Nonlinear relationship between the internal temperature of the instrument and the dark noise of the 500th pixel; (<b>b</b>) Correlation scatter plot of dark noise between dark pixels and other pixels (&gt;300 nm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>2-D Distribution of Spectral Dark Noise in the Spectrometer (x: 1-D Temporal Dimension, y: 1-D Spectral Dimension). (<b>a</b>) Untreated; (<b>b</b>) Using temperature as the independent variable; (<b>c</b>) Using the dark pixel DN value as the independent variable.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Daily standard deviation of dark noise across all pixels after applying the two noise reduction methods; (<b>b</b>) Probability distribution histograms of dark noise for the 500th pixel after applying the two noise reduction methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spectral Response Function for an Incident Wavelength of 400 nm. (<b>a</b>) First Measurement; (<b>b</b>) Second Measurement; (<b>c</b>) Third Measurement; (<b>d</b>) Fourth Measurement; (<b>e</b>) Fifth Measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spectral Response Function for an Incident Wavelength of 700 nm. (<b>a</b>) First Measurement; (<b>b</b>) Second Measurement; (<b>c</b>) Third Measurement; (<b>d</b>) Fourth Measurement; (<b>e</b>) Fifth Measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Radiometric Testing and Calibration Results Within the Spectral Range of the Instrument. (<b>a</b>) Measurement Repeatability; (<b>b</b>) Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>GSSIM SSI DN Values in Lijiang (March). (<b>a</b>) 550 nm; (<b>b</b>) 936 nm; (<b>c</b>) Day 2 DN Variation Across the Full Spectral Range During Daytime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Langley plot relationships for the five calibration days; (<b>b</b>) Interpolation-corrected spectral responsivity of GSSIM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Langley plot-averaged solar spectrum for day 5 (AM = 1.5). (<b>a</b>) Solar spectrum with Fraunhofer lines in the 400–600 nm band; (<b>b</b>) Solar spectrum with Fraunhofer dark lines in the 650–850 nm band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Atmospherically broadened Fraunhofer dark lines conforming to Lorentzian line shapes. (<b>a</b>) Fe e-line; (<b>b</b>) Fe E<sub>2</sub>-line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of AOD retrieved by GSSIM using two Langley plot calibration methods with CE318 retrievals. (<b>a</b>) Averaged Langley plot method; (<b>b</b>) Integrated Langley plot method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Absolute Deviations Between AOD Retrieved by Two Langley Plot Calibration Methods and CE318 Observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Linear Correlation Between AOD Retrieved by the Averaged Langley Plot Method and AOD Measured by the Standard Instrument.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Linear Correlation Between AOD Retrieved by the Integrated Langley Plot Method and AOD Measured by the Standard Instrument.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop