[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = autonomous railway traffic

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 4694 KiB  
Article
Modeling the Deployment and Management of Large-Scale Autonomous Vehicle Circulation in Mixed Road Traffic Conditions Considering Virtual Track Theory
by Kaiwen Hou and George Giannopoulos
Future Transp. 2024, 4(1), 215-235; https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp4010011 - 23 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1639
Abstract
This paper offers a novel view for managing and controlling the movement of driverless, i.e., autonomous, vehicles by converting this movement to a simulated train movement moving on a rail track. It expands on the “virtual track” theory and creates a model for [...] Read more.
This paper offers a novel view for managing and controlling the movement of driverless, i.e., autonomous, vehicles by converting this movement to a simulated train movement moving on a rail track. It expands on the “virtual track” theory and creates a model for virtual track autonomous vehicle management and control based on the ideas and methods of railway train operation. The developed model and adopted algorithm allow for large-scale autonomous driving vehicle control on the highway while considering the temporal-spatial distribution of vehicles, temporal-spatial trajectory diagram optimization, and the management and control model and algorithm for autonomous vehicles, as design goals. The ultimate objective is to increase the safety of the road traffic environment when autonomous vehicles are operating in it together with human-driven vehicles and achieve more integrated and precise organization and scheduling of these vehicles in such mixed traffic conditions. The developed model adopted a “particle swarm” optimization algorithm that is tested in a hypothetical network pending a full-scale test on a real highway. The paper concludes that the proposed management and control model and algorithm based on the “virtual track” theory is promising and demonstrates feasibility and effectiveness for further development and future application. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the highway section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Highway cell allocation for the virtual track preparation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Highway node processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of partial highway network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cell allocation and dispatching node processing for the highway network of <a href="#futuretransp-04-00011-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Highway virtual turnout setting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic graph of macro-level road network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of virtual-tracked micro-level road network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The partial display of SIMLite output file for the simple “virtual track” converted network of <a href="#futuretransp-04-00011-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Display of temporal-spatial trajectory diagram before and after optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Results of the optimization runs for the five cell 2-vehicle platoon case.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 5536 KiB  
Article
Multi-Modal Contrastive Learning for LiDAR Point Cloud Rail-Obstacle Detection in Complex Weather
by Lu Wen, Yongliang Peng, Miao Lin, Nan Gan and Rongqing Tan
Electronics 2024, 13(1), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13010220 - 3 Jan 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2660
Abstract
Obstacle intrusion is a serious threat to the safety of railway traffic. LiDAR point cloud 3D semantic segmentation (3DSS) provides a new method for unmanned rail-obstacle detection. However, the inevitable degradation of model performance occurs in complex weather and hinders its practical application. [...] Read more.
Obstacle intrusion is a serious threat to the safety of railway traffic. LiDAR point cloud 3D semantic segmentation (3DSS) provides a new method for unmanned rail-obstacle detection. However, the inevitable degradation of model performance occurs in complex weather and hinders its practical application. In this paper, a multi-modal contrastive learning (CL) strategy, named DHT-CL, is proposed to improve point cloud 3DSS in complex weather for rail-obstacle detection. DHT-CL is a camera and LiDAR sensor fusion strategy specifically designed for complex weather and obstacle detection tasks, without the need for image input during the inference stage. We first demonstrate how the sensor fusion method is more robust under rainy and snowy conditions, and then we design a Dual-Helix Transformer (DHT) to extract deeper cross-modal information through a neighborhood attention mechanism. Then, an obstacle anomaly-aware cross-modal discrimination loss is constructed for collaborative optimization that adapts to the anomaly identification task. Experimental results on a complex weather railway dataset show that with an mIoU of 87.38%, the proposed DHT-CL strategy achieves better performance compared to other high-performance models from the autonomous driving dataset, SemanticKITTI. The qualitative results show that DHT-CL achieves higher accuracy in clear weather and reduces false alarms in rainy and snowy weather. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Intelligent Transportation Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Railway point clouds in sunny and rainy weather. The top is sunny and the bottom is rainy. The point clouds are coloured by light intensity (strong to weak corresponds to red to blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of railway point cloud intensity under different weather conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Receptive fields of 2D and 3D networks: (<b>a</b>) 2D network receptive field, (<b>b</b>) projecting the point cloud onto the image, (<b>c</b>) re-projecting the 2D network receptive field into 3D, (<b>d</b>) 3D network receptive field. The re-projected 2D receptive field does not coincide with the 3D receptive field. Orange indicates receptive fields and blue indicates background.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Overview of DHT-CL. The point clouds and the images are processed independently by 2D and 3D encoding networks to generate the corresponding 2D and 3D features. Then, the DHT module extracts deeper information from these features, delivering the fusion features. Modality-independent classifiers generate two prediction scores, upon which the obstacle anomaly-aware modality discrimination loss is constructed. All processes are supervised by 3D labels, with only the 3D branch activated during the inference stage. Raw point clouds are coloured by intensity and labels are coloured by different object classes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Framework of the DHT module. Cross-attention is applied twice to the 2D and pseudo-2D features.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the local attention mechanism within the DHT module. (<b>a</b>) Selection of an anchor point, represented as a query vector <span class="html-italic">Q</span> (in red). (<b>b</b>) Search for neighborhood points (in blue) around this anchor point within a sliding window (a 5 × 5 kernel is shown in this diagram). Note that neighborhood points may be missing due to the sparsity of the point cloud. The missing points are indicated in gray. (<b>c</b>) Omission of the missing points by marking them as −1 in the GPU Hash table-based neighborhood address query operation. (<b>d</b>) Flattening of the irregular matrix and utilization as a key vector. Then, computing of the inner product between the query vector <span class="html-italic">Q</span> (in red) and the key vector <span class="html-italic">K</span> (in blue) to derive the attention weights. (<b>e</b>) Adjusting weight <span class="html-italic">K</span> by applying the weights derived from <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <msup> <mi>K</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) Updating the center element of the sliding window to produce the final output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram of adaptive contrastive learning strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Railway monitoring equipment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Label distribution of proposed complex weather railway dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>mIoU and mAcc at different distances and point cloud densities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The segmentation results of DHT-CL in clear weather. Colour meanings are as follows: purple: rail track, light blue: sleeper, cyan: gravel bed, green: plant, salmon red: unknown obstacle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The segmentation results of DHT-CL in rainy weather: (<b>a</b>) Image in rain. (<b>b</b>) Pure 3D net baseline without DHT-CL. (<b>c</b>) Enhanced by DHT-CL. (<b>d</b>) Ground-truth labels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The segmentation results of DHT-CL outside the FOVs in rainy and snowy weather: (<b>a</b>) Pure 3D net baseline without DHT-CL. (<b>b</b>) Enhanced by DHT-CL. (<b>c</b>) Ground-truth labels. Left is raining and right is snowing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>mIoU and mAcc values on the validation set, varying with the epoch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Total loss per epoch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Total loss per step.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Segmentation results for multi-class obstacles. Colour meanings are as follows: purple: rail track, light blue: sleeper, cyan: gravel bed, green: plant, salmon red: unknown obstacle, yellow: pedestrian.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>LiDAR sensor failures under extreme, heavy-rain conditions, causing false alarms. Left figure is raw point clouds and coloured by light intensity (strong to weak corresponds to red to blue), and right figure is detection result and coloured by object classes. Colour meanings refer to <a href="#electronics-13-00220-f0A1" class="html-fig">Figure A1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Full-scale point cloud segmentation results. Colour meanings refer to <a href="#electronics-13-00220-f0A1" class="html-fig">Figure A1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Learning rate per step.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Off-distribution noise in the training data. The point clouds are coloured by light intensity (strong to weak corresponds to red to blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Step 1. Raw point cloud data are collected by LiDAR sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>Step 2. Per-point labels of the original point clouds are generated by the recognition network.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>Step 3. The RoI (between the two red lines), i.e., the surveillance area, is delineated according to the location of the railway tracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9
<p>Step 4. The targets within the surveillance area are filtered and identified as potential threats.</p>
Full article ">Figure A10
<p>Step 5. The volume and location of each obstacle are calculated to produce the final alarms.</p>
Full article ">Figure A11
<p>Step 6. The final detection results.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3441 KiB  
Article
Autonomous-Vehicle Intersection Control Method Based on an Interlocking Block
by Yuxin Niu, Yizhuo Chang, Hongbo Li, Xiaoyuan Feng and Yilong Ren
Electronics 2024, 13(1), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13010110 - 26 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1084
Abstract
Non-signalized intersections have only ever been suitable for low traffic flow; however, with the development of autonomous driving technology and new control methods, the operation efficiency of this kind of intersection may be improved. In view of the shortcomings of existing non-signalized intersection [...] Read more.
Non-signalized intersections have only ever been suitable for low traffic flow; however, with the development of autonomous driving technology and new control methods, the operation efficiency of this kind of intersection may be improved. In view of the shortcomings of existing non-signalized intersection control methods in multilane situations and inspired by railway trains, an interlocking-block intersection control model is proposed. In this study, vehicles between parallel lanes are combined into a few combos, and the combo shape can be determined according to a pairing model and the interlocking angle range, and the gaps between the front and rear vehicles are simulated as blocks in a railway system, which are added into the intersection control model as virtual blocked cars (VBCs) for optimization. In setting the optimization objectives, the connotation and realization of fairness are discussed. Experimental results show that compared with signalized intersections, roundabouts, and non-signalized intersections without control, the interlocking-block intersection control model greatly reduces vehicle delay. Compared with an existing model, the calculation speed in a multilane situation has been greatly improved, while the vehicle delay is similar. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gap distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Maximum longitudinal distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of methods on interlocking problem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Three longitudinal relationship types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Combo shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interlocking angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The formation process of interlocking block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Virtual blocked car.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The number of variables and constraints of two models under different vehicle quantities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Ratio of constraint quantity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The effects of two models.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2758 KiB  
Article
Reducing Risks by Transporting Dangerous Cargo in Drones
by Raj Bridgelall
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13044; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013044 - 12 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3351
Abstract
The transportation of dangerous goods by truck or railway multiplies the risk of harm to people and the environment when accidents occur. Many manufacturers are developing autonomous drones that can fly heavy cargo and safely integrate into the national air space. Those developments [...] Read more.
The transportation of dangerous goods by truck or railway multiplies the risk of harm to people and the environment when accidents occur. Many manufacturers are developing autonomous drones that can fly heavy cargo and safely integrate into the national air space. Those developments present an opportunity to not only diminish risk but also to decrease cost and ground traffic congestion by moving certain types of dangerous cargo by air. This work identified a minimal set of metropolitan areas where initial cargo drone deployments would be the most impactful in demonstrating the safety, efficiency, and environmental benefits of this technology. The contribution is a new hybrid data mining workflow that combines unsupervised machine learning (UML) and geospatial information system (GIS) techniques to inform managerial or investment decision making. The data mining and UML techniques transformed comprehensive origin–destination records of more than 40 commodity category movements to identify a minimal set of metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with the greatest demand for transporting dangerous goods. The GIS part of the workflow determined the geodesic distances between and within all pairwise combinations of MSAs in the continental United States. The case study of applying the workflow to a commodity category of dangerous goods revealed that cargo drone deployments in only nine MSAs in four U.S. states can transport 38% of those commodities within 400 miles. The analysis concludes that future cargo drone technology has the potential to replace the equivalent of 4.7 million North American semitrailer trucks that currently move dangerous cargo through populated communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The HDM workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>MSAs, remaining FAF Zones, and their centroids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of clustering results for (<b>a</b>) DBSCAN, (<b>b</b>) Louvain, and (<b>c</b>) k-means.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>MSA rank of BCMs moved by truck, rail, and air.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>MSA rank of BCMs moved by truck, rail, and air.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 10020 KiB  
Article
Real-Time 3D Multi-Object Detection and Localization Based on Deep Learning for Road and Railway Smart Mobility
by Antoine Mauri, Redouane Khemmar, Benoit Decoux, Madjid Haddad and Rémi Boutteau
J. Imaging 2021, 7(8), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080145 - 12 Aug 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4413
Abstract
For smart mobility, autonomous vehicles, and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADASs), perception of the environment is an important task in scene analysis and understanding. Better perception of the environment allows for enhanced decision making, which, in turn, enables very high-precision actions. To this end, [...] Read more.
For smart mobility, autonomous vehicles, and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADASs), perception of the environment is an important task in scene analysis and understanding. Better perception of the environment allows for enhanced decision making, which, in turn, enables very high-precision actions. To this end, we introduce in this work a new real-time deep learning approach for 3D multi-object detection for smart mobility not only on roads, but also on railways. To obtain the 3D bounding boxes of the objects, we modified a proven real-time 2D detector, YOLOv3, to predict 3D object localization, object dimensions, and object orientation. Our method has been evaluated on KITTI’s road dataset as well as on our own hybrid virtual road/rail dataset acquired from the video game Grand Theft Auto (GTA) V. The evaluation of our method on these two datasets shows good accuracy, but more importantly that it can be used in real-time conditions, in road and rail traffic environments. Through our experimental results, we also show the importance of the accuracy of prediction of the regions of interest (RoIs) used in the estimation of 3D bounding box parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Visual Localization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of our 3D bounding box detector. A single RGB image is used as the input for our method; the shared convolutional features are then extracted by the network backbone, Darknet-53. We leverage the proven 2D object detector, YOLOv3, to perform the RoI and object class prediction. We then extract the RoI features by using the feature alignment used in [<a href="#B14-jimaging-07-00145" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. The 3D bounding box parameters are predicted by our CNN’s parameter prediction, and finally the 3D bounding box is drawn on the image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of the object azimuth <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> and its observed orientation <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math>. The local orientation is retrieved by computing the angle between the normal to the ray between the camera and the object center and the X-axis of the camera. Given that we are using left-hand coordinates, the rotation is clockwise. Our method estimates the observed orientation and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math> can be obtained using Equation (<a href="#FD2-jimaging-07-00145" class="html-disp-formula">2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>In these graphs, we compare the orientation score obtained by our method (with or without ground truth box) on the different dataset classes; we also include the results of the “3D joint monocular” method (which also uses ground truth boxes). We can see that our method has a lower orientation score when we do not use Ground truth (GT) bounding boxes. This can be explained by the fact that the boxes used for feature alignment during inference are the same as those used during training.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>In these graphs, we compare the depth RMSE obtained by our method (with or without ground truth box) on the different dataset classes; we also include the results of the “3D joint monocular” method (which also uses ground truth boxes). We can see that our method obtains a higher RMSE error when we do not use GT bounding boxes. This can be explained by the fact that the boxes used for feature alignment during inference are the same as those used during training. We can also see that there is a significant loss in accuracy on smaller classes such as bicycles or people when our method predicts RoIs using YOLOv3 instead of using ground truth. This can be explained by the fact that variations in the prediction of RoIs have a greater impact than for larger classes like cars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Qualitative results of our method were obtained through KITTI and our GTAV datasets. These images were extracted from the validation split of each dataset. The RoIs used for predicting the 3D bounding box parameters were computed through YOLOv3. 4 top lines: results obtained for GTAV dataset (left column: ground truth; right column: prediction), 4 bottom lines: results obtained for KITTI dataset (left column: ground truth; right column: prediction).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1380 KiB  
Article
Hybridized-GNSS Approaches to Train Positioning: Challenges and Open Issues on Uncertainty
by Susanna Spinsante and Cosimo Stallo
Sensors 2020, 20(7), 1885; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071885 - 29 Mar 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 6049
Abstract
In recent years, the development of advanced systems and applications has propelled the adoption of autonomous railway traffic and train positioning, with several ongoing initiatives and experimental testbeds aimed at proving the suitability and reliability of the Global Navigation Satellite System signals and [...] Read more.
In recent years, the development of advanced systems and applications has propelled the adoption of autonomous railway traffic and train positioning, with several ongoing initiatives and experimental testbeds aimed at proving the suitability and reliability of the Global Navigation Satellite System signals and services, in this specific application domain. To satisfy the strict safety and accuracy requirements aimed at assuring the position solution’s integrity, availability, accuracy and reliability, recent proposals suggest the hybridization of the Global Navigation Satellite System with other technologies. The integration with localization techniques that are expected to be available with the upcoming fifth generation mobile communication networks is among the most promising approaches. In this work, different approaches to the design of hybrid positioning solutions for the railway sector are examined, under the perspective of the uncertainty evaluation of the attained results and performance. In fact, the way the uncertainty associated to the positioning measurements performed by different studies is reported is often not consistent with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, and this makes it very difficult to fairly compare the different approaches in order to identify the best emerging solution. Under this perspective, the review provided by this work highlights a number of open issues that should drive future research activities in this field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>GNSS satellites’ positions at 23:00 on 31 December 2019 (from <a href="http://www.igmas.org" target="_blank">http://www.igmas.org</a>, retrieved on 7 February 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Receiver’s pseudoranges (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>p</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>) from three satellites.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2606 KiB  
Article
Platooning of Autonomous Public Transport Vehicles: The Influence of Ride Comfort on Travel Delay
by Teron Nguyen, Meng Xie, Xiaodong Liu, Nimal Arunachalam, Andreas Rau, Bernhard Lechner, Fritz Busch and Y. D. Wong
Sustainability 2019, 11(19), 5237; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195237 - 24 Sep 2019
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5996
Abstract
The development of advanced technologies has led to the emergence of autonomous vehicles. Herein, autonomous public transport (APT) systems equipped with prioritization measures are being designed to operate at ever faster speeds compared to conventional buses. Innovative APT systems are configured to accommodate [...] Read more.
The development of advanced technologies has led to the emergence of autonomous vehicles. Herein, autonomous public transport (APT) systems equipped with prioritization measures are being designed to operate at ever faster speeds compared to conventional buses. Innovative APT systems are configured to accommodate prevailing passenger demand for peak as well as non-peak periods, by electronic coupling and decoupling of platooned units along travel corridors, such as the dynamic autonomous road transit (DART) system being researched in Singapore. However, there is always the trade-off between high vehicle speed versus passenger ride comfort, especially lateral ride comfort. This study analyses a new APT system within the urban context and evaluates its performance using microscopic traffic simulation. The platooning protocol of autonomous vehicles was first developed for simulating the coupling/decoupling process. Platooning performance was then simulated on VISSIM platform for various scenarios to compare the performance of DART platooning under several ride comfort levels: three bus comfort and two railway criteria. The study revealed that it is feasible to operate the DART system following the bus standing comfort criterion (ay = 1.5 m/s2) without any significant impact on system travel time. For the DART system operating to maintain a ride comfort of the high-speed train (HST) and light rail transit (LRT), the delay can constitute up to ≈ 10% and ≈ 5% of travel time, respectively. This investigation is crucial for the system delay management towards precisely designed service frequency and improved passenger ride comfort. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Examples of autonomous public transport (APT) platooning in (<b>a</b>) Singapore, source: <a href="https://www.tum-create.edu.sg/" target="_blank">https://www.tum-create.edu.sg/</a>; (<b>b</b>) NEXT’s modular self-driving vehicles designed in Dubai, source: <a href="http://www.next-future-mobility.com/" target="_blank">http://www.next-future-mobility.com/</a>; and (<b>c</b>) Autonomous rail rapid transit in China, source: <a href="http://www.crrcgc.cc/zzs" target="_blank">http://www.crrcgc.cc/zzs</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of the APT coupling based on bus platooning [<a href="#B43-sustainability-11-05237" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Planned DART network in Singapore (<b>a</b>) 18 lines; (<b>b</b>) extracted corridor consisting of 6 turning curves with stated radii as 6 reduced speed areas as input for traffic simulation; and (<b>c</b>) the formation of merged-platoons from platoon A and platoon B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Trajectories of different merged-platoons of 3, 4, 5 modules. The locations of terminals, stops and curves along platoon 1 trajectories are also applied for platoon 2 and platoon 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Screenshot from VISSIM shows detailed information of vehicles all appeared at the time-slice C-C in <a href="#sustainability-11-05237-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>. The platooning information is illustrated based on the under-developed coupling/decoupling protocol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Travel time and delay (bus sitting as reference) of 3 platoons at different ride comfort criteria. The value inside the graphs is the travel time and delay of platoon 3 for reference.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop