[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (251)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = arbuscular mycorrhiza

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 2142 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Tomato Seedling Production in the Tropics: Effects of Trichoderma, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, and Key Agronomical Factors
by Teresa Leuratti, Lorenzo Fellin, Nicola Michelon, Juan Bosco Palacios Tario, Jaime Ernesto Santamaria Gutiérrez, Giorgio Gianquinto, Francesco Orsini and Giampaolo Zanin
Agronomy 2025, 15(2), 392; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020392 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 234
Abstract
Agriculture remains a key contributor to Central America’s economy, despite climate change posing a significant threat to the sector. In the Trifinio region, already afflicted by arid summers, temperatures are expected to rise in the near future, potentially exacerbating the vulnerability of smallholder [...] Read more.
Agriculture remains a key contributor to Central America’s economy, despite climate change posing a significant threat to the sector. In the Trifinio region, already afflicted by arid summers, temperatures are expected to rise in the near future, potentially exacerbating the vulnerability of smallholder farmers. This study investigates the effects of two fungal symbionts, Trichoderma asperellum (TR) and the Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) Glomus cubense, and agronomic choices and practices such as cultivar selection, substrate type, and fertigation management on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedling growth and quality. Results showed that nutrient solution and the adoption of forest topsoil as substrate significantly enhanced morphological, physiological, and quality parameters. Modifying the nutrient solution to allow for an increase in plant height of 170% and a dry weight of 163% and enhancing Dickson’s quality index (DQI) by 64.5%, while the use of forest topsoil resulted in plants 58.6% higher, with an increase of 101% in dry weight and of 90.1% in the DQI. Both T. asperellum and G. cubense had positive effects on specific growth parameters; for instance, TR increased leaf number (+6.95%), while AMF increased stem diameter (+3.56%) and root length (+19.1%), although they did not, overall, significantly increase the seedling’s biomass and quality. These findings underscore the importance of agronomic practices in mitigating the impacts of climate change on tomato production, offering valuable insights for farmers in semi-arid regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Horticultural and Floricultural Crops)
25 pages, 1672 KiB  
Article
Impact of Mycorrhiza Inoculations and Iron Amino Chelate on Growth and Physiological Changes of Cucumber Seedlings Across Different pH Levels
by Saber Mohammadnia, Maryam Haghighi, Maryam Mozafarian and András Geösel
Plants 2025, 14(3), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030341 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 423
Abstract
Cucumber, a vital greenhouse crop, thrives in soils with a pH range of 5.5–6.5, yet the combined effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and iron amino chelates on its growth and physiological responses across varying pH levels remain underexplored. This study used a [...] Read more.
Cucumber, a vital greenhouse crop, thrives in soils with a pH range of 5.5–6.5, yet the combined effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and iron amino chelates on its growth and physiological responses across varying pH levels remain underexplored. This study used a factorial design in a completely randomized setup with three replications and was conducted at the Horticulture Department of Isfahan University of Technology. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of AMF inoculation (Glomus mosseae) and iron amino chelates on the growth and physiological responses of cucumber plants at various pH levels. Treatments included two levels of AMF inoculation (non-inoculated as m1 and inoculated as m2), three levels of iron concentration (f1: no iron, f2: Johnson’s nutrient solution, f3: Johnson’s solution with iron amino chelate), and three pH levels (pH 5 (p1), pH 7 (p2), and pH 8 (p3)). The moisture was maintained at field capacity throughout the study. The results demonstrated that mycorrhizal inoculation at pH 7 significantly improved key traits, including chlorophyll content, photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, phenol content, and antioxidant activity. Mycorrhizal inoculation combined with 2 ppm of Fe amino chelate at pH 7 led to the highest improvement in shoot fresh weight of cucumber and physiological traits. However, at pH 7 without mycorrhiza, stress indicators such as ABA levels and antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) increased, highlighting the protective role of AMF under neutral pH conditions. In contrast, pH 5 was most effective for enhancing root and stem fresh weight. The lower pH may have facilitated better nutrient solubility and uptake, promoting root development and overall plant health by optimizing the availability of essential nutrients and reducing competition for resources under more acidic conditions. These findings highlight the potential of combining mycorrhizal inoculation with iron amino chelates at pH 7 not only to enhance cucumber growth and resilience in nutrient-limited environments but also to contribute to sustainable agricultural practices that address global challenges in food security and soil health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Protection and Biotic Interactions)
18 pages, 3440 KiB  
Article
Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis on Photosynthetic, Antioxidant Enzyme, and Water Flux Parameters in Salt-Stressed Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Plants
by Pooja Pooja, Sarita Devi, Sridevi Tallapragada, Yogesh K. Ahlawat, Nisha Sharma, Pankaj Kasnia, Nita Lakra, Rosa Porcel, Jose M. Mulet and Khalid M. Elhindi
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010247 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 477
Abstract
Globally, escalating soil salinization poses significant abiotic stress, disproportionately impacting crops like chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). This legume exhibits high sensitivity to salinity, which disrupts various physiological and metabolic processes, ultimately hindering growth and productivity. AMF (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus) reduces salt’s detrimental [...] Read more.
Globally, escalating soil salinization poses significant abiotic stress, disproportionately impacting crops like chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). This legume exhibits high sensitivity to salinity, which disrupts various physiological and metabolic processes, ultimately hindering growth and productivity. AMF (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus) reduces salt’s detrimental effects on plants’ growth by bolstering the plant’s antioxidant defense system, effectively reducing the damage caused by oxidative stress. In this study, the impact of AMF on salinity stress alleviation in chickpea was investigated in pot-grown experiments. Rhizophagus fasciculatus was used to inoculate the seeds of three different chickpea varieties (HC-3, CSG-8962, and C-235), and the physiological and biochemical changes of the AMF-inoculated and non-inoculated chickpea plants were studied. When exposed to salinity stress, the plants exhibited decreased leaf relative water content (RWC %) (21.13–31.30%), increased leaf relative stress injury, decreased chlorophyll content (45.22–58.24%), photochemical quantum yield, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance as compared to the control plants, but opposite results were observed in AMF colonized plants. A 9.16% to 14.79% increase in chlorophyll content was reported after AMF colonization. The activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX) were increased by salt stress. They were further enhanced by AMF inoculation SOD activity by 20.3% to 23.3%, CAT activity by 65.7% to 78.7%, and POX activity by 32.7% to 39.3%. The findings clearly show that AMF Rhizophagus fasciculatus, via enhancing RWC, photosynthetic parameters, and antioxidant enzymes, can mitigate salinity stress in chickpeas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant-Crop Biology and Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>AMF (<span class="html-italic">Rhizophagus fasciculatus</span>) colonization in <span class="html-italic">C. arietinum</span> roots: (<b>A</b>) Heavily colonized root section of chickpea; (<b>B</b>) Spores (S), arbuscles (A), and hyphae (H) formed in roots; (<b>C</b>) Hyphae (H) and vesicles (V) in chickpea roots; (<b>D</b>) AMF spores (S) and hyphae (H) in the colonized roots; (<b>E</b>) Arbuscles (A), vesicles (V), spores (S), and hyphae (H) of AMF in the colonized roots; (<b>F</b>) Vesicle in the colonized chickpea root.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on RWC of chickpea varieties under the influence of salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on chickpea varieties’ RSI under salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on chickpea varieties’ total chlorophyll content under salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on the photochemical quantum yield of chickpea varieties under the influence of salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on the photosynthetic rate of chickpea varieties under the influence of salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on the transpiration rate of chickpea varieties under the influence of salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on chickpea varieties’ stomatal conductance under salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on SOD activity of chickpea varieties under the influence of salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on chickpea varieties’ CAT activity under salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Impact of mycorrhiza on POX activity of chickpea varieties under the influence of salt treatment. Bars are the means of three replicas (n = 3) ± S.E. Asterisks show significant differences at * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>PCA biplot for several chickpea genotype parameters under treatments T1 (control), T2 (2 dSm<sup>−1</sup>), T3 (3 dSm<sup>−1</sup>), T4 (4 dSm<sup>−1</sup>), T5 (control + AM), T6 (2 dSm<sup>−1</sup> + AM), T7 (3 dSm<sup>−1</sup> + AM), T8 (4 dSm<sup>−1</sup> + AM).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 1857 KiB  
Article
Responsivity of Two Pea Genotypes to the Symbiosis with Rhizobia and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi—A Proteomics Aspect of the “Efficiency of Interactions with Beneficial Soil Microorganisms” Trait
by Andrej Frolov, Julia Shumilina, Sarah Etemadi Afshar, Valeria Mashkina, Ekaterina Rhomanovskaya, Elena Lukasheva, Alexander Tsarev, Anton S. Sulima, Oksana Y. Shtark, Christian Ihling, Alena Soboleva, Igor A. Tikhonovich and Vladimir A. Zhukov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 463; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020463 - 8 Jan 2025
Viewed by 457
Abstract
It is well known that individual pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars differ in their symbiotic responsivity. This trait is typically manifested with an increase in seed weights, due to inoculation with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The aim of this study [...] Read more.
It is well known that individual pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars differ in their symbiotic responsivity. This trait is typically manifested with an increase in seed weights, due to inoculation with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The aim of this study was to characterize alterations in the root proteome of highly responsive pea genotype k-8274 plants and low responsive genotype k-3358 ones grown in non-sterile soil, which were associated with root colonization with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (in comparison to proteome shifts caused by soil supplementation with mineral nitrogen salts). Our results clearly indicate that supplementation of the soil with mineral nitrogen-containing salts switched the root proteome of both genotypes to assimilation of the available nitrogen, whereas the processes associated with nitrogen fixation were suppressed. Surprisingly, inoculation with rhizobial bacteria had only a minor effect on the root proteomes of both genotypes. The most pronounced response was observed for the highly responsive k-8274 genotype inoculated simultaneously with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. This response involved activation of the proteins related to redox metabolism and suppression of excessive nodule formation. In turn, the low responsive genotype k-3358 demonstrated a pronounced inoculation-induced suppression of protein metabolism and enhanced diverse defense reactions in pea roots under the same soil conditions. The results of the study shed light on the molecular basis of differential symbiotic responsivity in different pea cultivars. The raw data are available in the PRIDE repository under the project accession number PXD058701 and project DOI 10.6019/PXD058701. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The numbers of non-redundant proteins (protein groups), identified in the <span class="html-italic">P. sativum</span> genotypes k-8274 (<b>a</b>) and k-3358 (<b>b</b>) plants grown in the absence of soil supplementations (controls), plants grown with supplementation of mineral nitrogen salts in the absence of microorganism complementation (mineral nutrition, MN), plants inoculated with rhizobia (nodule bacteria, NB), and plants inoculated with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (NB+AMF).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The most represented functional groups (<b>a</b>) and prediction of sub-cellular localization (<b>b</b>) for the proteins identified as differentially abundant in the roots of the k-3358 and k-8274 <span class="html-italic">P. sativum</span> plants. The individual proteins comprising each functional group (as well as all related information) are listed in <a href="#app1-ijms-26-00463" class="html-app">Supplementary Tables S4-1, S4-2, S5-1 and S5-2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Top five functional groups (bins) representing the proteins identified as differentially abundant in <span class="html-italic">P.sativum</span> genotypes k-3358 (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) and k-8274 (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) under different soil supplementation conditions—external mineral nitrogen nutrition (MN, (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>)), symbiotic rhizobia (nodule bacteria—NB, (<b>c</b>), combined complementation of arbuscular mycorrhiza and nodule bacteria (AMF+NB, (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>)). Numerical values indicate the numbers of proteins constituting individual up- (green) or down-regulated (red) functional classes. The individual proteins comprising each functional group (in addition to all related information) are listed in <a href="#app1-ijms-26-00463" class="html-app">Supplementary Information S1, Figures S1-5–S1-10 and Supplementary Information S4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Prediction of the sub-cellular localization of proteins identified as up- and down-regulated in <span class="html-italic">P. sativum</span> genotypes k-3358 (panels (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>)) and K 8274 (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) under external mineral nitrogen nutrition conditions (MN, panels (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>)), upon inoculation with nodule bacteria (NB, panel (<b>c</b>)), upon the combined inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and nodule bacteria (AMF+NB, panels (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>)). The individual proteins annotated to specific predicted compartments are listed in <a href="#app1-ijms-26-00463" class="html-app">Supplementary information S5</a>. SM—symbiosome membrane, EPR—endoplasmic reticulum, PM—plasma membrane.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 18840 KiB  
Article
Rooting for Resilience: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Boost Citrus Tolerance to Water Scarcity in Rangpur Lime and Carrizo Citrange Rootstocks
by Sajjad Hussain, Mehwish Jan, Muhammad Fasih Khalid, Sakeena Tul-Ain Haider, Muhammad Arif Ali, Shakeel Ahmad, Samreen Sabir, Mamoudou Sétamou and Raphael Morillon
Horticulturae 2025, 11(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010024 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 807
Abstract
Fruits and vegetables play a crucial role in addressing food security challenges posed by the growing global population. Citrus fruits are among the most widely cultivated crops worldwide; however, their production is steadily declining due to climate change. Among the various biotic and [...] Read more.
Fruits and vegetables play a crucial role in addressing food security challenges posed by the growing global population. Citrus fruits are among the most widely cultivated crops worldwide; however, their production is steadily declining due to climate change. Among the various biotic and abiotic stresses affecting citrus production, water scarcity caused by climate change stands out as a significant issue. Interestingly, the rhizosphere of citrus plants is home to beneficial fungi known as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). AMF have been shown to enhance the growth and development of host plants. They also improve the plants’ tolerance to various stresses and enhance soil structure. This study aimed to evaluate the response of two different citrus rootstocks—Rangpur lime and Carrizo citrange—when subjected to three mycorrhizal treatments, namely, AMF+ (inoculated with AMF), AMF- (treated with fungicide to eliminate AMF), and a control (naturally occurring AMF), under conditions of water deficit. The results indicated that the AMF+ treatment had a significant positive effect on both rootstock genotypes compared to the AMF- treatment. Physiological attributes such as photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, non-photochemical quenching, and both dark and light quantum yield exhibited significantly smaller declines under water deficit conditions in AMF+ plants compared to those in the AMF- and control groups. Conversely, stress indicators—such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)—increased significantly in the AMF- treatment compared to AMF+. Additionally, the increase in antioxidative enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APx) and osmotic adjustment (proline (PRO)) was more pronounced in the AMF+ treatment in the leaves and roots of both citrus rootstocks. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the presence and application of AMF in citrus roots may enhance the plants’ ability to cope with water scarcity more effectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves of Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings under control and water deficit conditions: (<b>A</b>) photosynthesis; (<b>B</b>) transpiration rate; (<b>C</b>) stomatal conductance; (<b>D</b>) NPQ; (<b>E</b>) Fv/Fm; (<b>F</b>) Fv’/Fm’. Values are mean ± S.E. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The bar graphs correspond to <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i001"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i001" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i001.png"/></span> = control, <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i002"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i002" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i002.png"/></span> = water deficit. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota). The different letters above bars, it means that those points are statistically significantly different from each other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Leaf greenness SPAD; (<b>B</b>) relative water content %; (<b>C</b>) leaf surface area; (<b>D</b>) mycorrhizal colonization % in Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings under control and water deficit conditions. Values are mean ± S.E. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The bar graphs correspond to <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i001"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i001" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i001.png"/></span> = control, <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i002"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i002" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i002.png"/></span> = water deficit. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota). The different letters above bars, it means that those points are statistically significantly different from each other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Superoxide dismutase; (<b>B</b>) peroxidase; (<b>C</b>) catalase; (<b>D</b>) ascorbate peroxidase; (<b>E</b>) malondialdehyde; (<b>F</b>) hydrogen peroxide in the leaves of Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings under control and water deficit conditions. Values are mean ± S.E. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The bar graphs correspond to <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i001"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i001" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i001.png"/></span> = control, <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i002"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i002" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i002.png"/></span> = water deficit. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota). The different letters above bars, it means that those points are statistically significantly different from each other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Superoxide dismutase; (<b>B</b>) peroxidase; (<b>C</b>) catalase; (<b>D</b>) ascorbate peroxidase; (<b>E</b>) malondialdehyde; (<b>F</b>) hydrogen peroxide in the roots of Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings under control and water deficit conditions. Values are mean ± S.E. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The bar graphs correspond to <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i001"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i001" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i001.png"/></span> = control, <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i002"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i002" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i002.png"/></span> = water deficit. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota). The different letters above bars, it means that those points are statistically significantly different from each other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measurements of the biochemical parameters along the stress in leaves: (<b>A</b>) total proline content; (<b>B</b>) total soluble proteins; (<b>C</b>) chlorophyll ‘a’; (<b>D</b>) chlorophyll ‘b’; (<b>E</b>) antioxidant capacity; (<b>F</b>) total phenolic content in the leaves of Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings under control and water deficit conditions. Values are mean ± S.E. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The bar graphs correspond to <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i001"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i001" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i001.png"/></span> = control, <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i002"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i002" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i002.png"/></span> = water deficit. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota). The different letters above bars, it means that those points are statistically significantly different from each other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Measurements of the biochemical parameters along the stress in roots: (<b>A</b>) total proline content; (<b>B</b>) total soluble proteins; (<b>C</b>) antioxidant capacity; (<b>D</b>) total phenolic content in the roots of Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings under control and water deficit conditions. Values are mean ± S.E. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The bar graphs correspond to <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i001"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i001" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i001.png"/></span> = control, <span class="html-fig-inline" id="horticulturae-11-00024-i002"><img alt="Horticulturae 11 00024 i002" src="/horticulturae/horticulturae-11-00024/article_deploy/html/images/horticulturae-11-00024-i002.png"/></span> = water deficit. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota). The different letters above bars, it means that those points are statistically significantly different from each other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Root microscopic analysis: (<b>A</b>) natural; (<b>B</b>) AMF inoculated; (<b>C</b>) no mycorrhiza of the roots of Rangpur lime (RL) and Carrizo citrange (CC) rootstock seedlings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of Rangpur lime and Carrizo citrange. M<sub>0</sub> = control (no inoculum/natural microbiota); M<sub>1</sub> = AMF+ (AMF inoculation 5 g/20 kg soil); M<sub>2</sub> = AMF- (no microbiota).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4560 KiB  
Article
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as a Salt Bioaccumulation Mechanism for the Establishment of a Neotropical Halophytic Fern in Saline Soils
by Mónica A. Lugo, María A. Negritto, Esteban M. Crespo, Hebe J. Iriarte, Samuel Núñez, Luisa F. Espinosa and Marcela C. Pagano
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122587 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 682
Abstract
Acrostichum aureum is a halophytic pantropical invasive fern growing in mangroves and swamps. Its association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been reported in Asia. AMF and their symbiosis (AM) commonly colonise the absorption organs of terrestrial plants worldwide. Furthermore, AMF/AM are well [...] Read more.
Acrostichum aureum is a halophytic pantropical invasive fern growing in mangroves and swamps. Its association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been reported in Asia. AMF and their symbiosis (AM) commonly colonise the absorption organs of terrestrial plants worldwide. Furthermore, AMF/AM are well known for their capacity to bioaccumulate toxic elements and to alleviate biotic and abiotic stress (e.g., salinity stress) in their hosts. However, the mechanisms underlying AMF involvement in the halophytism of A. aureum and the structures where NaCl accumulates remain unknown. This study shows that A. aureum forms AM in margins of natural thermal ponds in Neotropical wetlands. All mature sporophytes were colonised by AMF, with high percentages for root length (ca. 57%), arbuscules (23), and hyphae (25) and low values for vesicles (2%). In A. aureum–AMF symbiosis, NaCl accumulated in AMF vesicles, and CaSO4 precipitated in colonised roots. Therefore, AM can contribute to the halophytic nature of this fern, allowing it to thrive in saline and thermal environments by capturing NaCl from fern tissues, compartmentalising it inside its vesicles, and precipitating CaSO4. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sampling site in El Volcán thermal ponds, near the Córdoba River mouth in the Caribbean Sea, Magdalena Department, Colombia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">Acrostichum aureum</span> in the El Volcán thermal ponds, Córdoba River, Colombia. (<b>a</b>) Fern sporophytes growing on the margin. (<b>b</b>) Frond of <span class="html-italic">A. aureum</span> exhibiting fertile and non-fertile pinnae. Photo credits: (<b>a</b>), María A. Negritto; (<b>b</b>), Samuel Núñez.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Colonisation by AMF in fine roots of <span class="html-italic">Acrostichum aureum</span>. (<b>a</b>) General view of a fern root colonised by AMF; (<b>b</b>) AMF vesicles; (<b>c</b>) AMF hyphal coils and arbuscules; (<b>d</b>) AMF arbuscules. Arrowheads indicate illustrated structures. Photo credit: Mónica A. Lugo.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>AMF structures outside and inside fine roots of <span class="html-italic">Acrostichum aureum</span> with dense cytoplasmic content (arrowhead). (<b>a</b>) AMF hypha; (<b>b</b>) AMF spores outside roots; (<b>c</b>) AMF vesicles; (<b>d</b>) AMF arbuscules inside roots. Photo credit: Mónica A. Lugo.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Salt crystals inside AMF vesicles. (<b>a</b>) Vesicles of AMF with NaCl crystals (indicated by the arrowhead) observed under optical microscope. (<b>b</b>) The EDX analysis of the crystals in the vesicles showed the elemental composition of NaCl. NaCl crystals and each salt element are indicated by arrowheads. Photo credit: Mónica A. Lugo.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Salts accumulated inside roots of <span class="html-italic">Acrostichum aureum</span> analysed by SEM-EDX. (<b>a</b>) SEM image of amorphous crystals obtained with the backscattered electron detector (black arrowhead). (<b>b</b>) X-ray mapping indicating the distribution of S in an <span class="html-italic">A. aureum</span> root (red arrowhead). (<b>c</b>) X-ray mapping indicating the distribution of Ca in the root (yellow arrowhead). (<b>d</b>) EDX spectrum of amorphous crystals, showing their CaSO<sub>4</sub> composition (red and yellow arrowheads).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 2618 KiB  
Review
The Importance of Mycorrhizal Fungi and Their Associated Bacteria in Promoting Crops’ Performance: An Applicative Perspective
by Miriana Bortolot, Beatrice Buffoni, Sonia Mazzarino, Gregory Hoff, Elena Martino, Valentina Fiorilli and Alessandra Salvioli Di Fossalunga
Horticulturae 2024, 10(12), 1326; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10121326 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 964
Abstract
Agricultural systems are particularly impacted by global climate change (CC), responsible for the introduction of multiple environmental stressors negatively affecting plant growth. Soil microbial communities are crucial in agricultural practices, influencing crop performance and soil health. Human activities and CC threaten soil microbial [...] Read more.
Agricultural systems are particularly impacted by global climate change (CC), responsible for the introduction of multiple environmental stressors negatively affecting plant growth. Soil microbial communities are crucial in agricultural practices, influencing crop performance and soil health. Human activities and CC threaten soil microbial biodiversity, leading to soil quality degradation and decreasing plant health and productivity. Among plant-beneficial microorganisms, mycorrhizal fungi are widespread in terrestrial ecosystems, including agroecosystems, and they play a key role by enhancing plants’ fitness and resilience to both abiotic and biotic stresses. Therefore, exploring the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis in sustainable agriculture has become increasingly critical. Moreover, the application of mycorrhizal bioinoculants could reduce dependence on inorganic fertilizers, enhance crop yield, and support plants in overcoming environmental stresses. This review, after briefly introducing taxonomy, morphology and mechanisms supporting the symbiosis establishment, reports the roles of mycorrhizal fungi and their associated bacteria in improving plant nutrition and mitigating CC-induced abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity, also giving specific examples. The focus is on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), but ericoid mycorrhizal (ErM) fungi are also considered as promising microorganisms for a sustainable agricultural model. New emerging concepts are illustrated, such as the role of AMF hyphosphere in acting as a preferential niche to host plant growth-promoting bacteria and the potential of ErM fungi to improve plant performance on Ericaceae plants but also on non-host plants, behaving as endophytes. Finally, the potential and limitations of mycorrhizal-based bioinoculants are discussed as possible alternatives to chemical-based products. To this aim, possible ways to overcome problems and limitations to their use are discussed such as proper formulations, the systematic check of AMF propagule viability and the application of suitable agronomical practices in the field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Interaction with Horticulture Plant Growth and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic presentation of the AM colonization process and the rhizosphere and hyphosphere microbiome. AM fungal spores (S) germinate after a molecular dialog between partners (i.e., SLs and COs). Fungal hyphae reach the root epidermis (EP) and develop a swollen structure called hyphopodia (HP). After this contact, the fungal hyphae penetrate the root and progress until the cortex cells, where AM fungi form arbuscules (ARB); in these structures, the nutrient exchange occurs bidirectionally. The arbuscule is surrounded by a plant-derived membrane (PAM, peri-arbuscular membrane in gray) and between the PAM and fungal cell wall there is an apoplastic space called the peri-arbuscular space (in yellow). Outside the root, bacteria live in association with the plant in a narrow space called rhizosphere (in non-mycorrhizal root plants, area in blue), mycorrhizosphere (in mycorrhizal root plants, area in green), and in association with the hyphae (hyphosphere area in orange). Bacteria that live inside the spore are called endobacteria [<a href="#B67-horticulturae-10-01326" class="html-bibr">67</a>]. ARB = arbuscule (Y, young, or M, mature), ERM = extraradical mycelium, HB = hyphal branching, IRM = intraradical mycelium, N = nucleus, EN = endodermis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Publications per year related to: (<b>a</b>) bacterial–fungal interaction in crop plants and soil (keywords used in PUBMED: interaction, crop, plant, soil, fungi, fungal, mycorrhizal, bacteria), and (<b>b</b>) mycorrhiza helper bacteria in crop plants and soil (keywords used in PUBMED: crop, plant, soil, mycorrhiza helper bacteria). In figure (<b>c</b>), we have a focus on mycorrhiza helper bacteria publications in the last 20 years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) ErM symbiosis morphology. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">In vitro V. myrtillus</span> non-inoculated seedlings. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">In vitro V. myrtillus</span> seedlings inoculated with <span class="html-italic">O. maius</span>. (<b>c</b>) Transverse section of a <span class="html-italic">V. oxycoccos</span> hair root characterized by very large epidermal cells (Ep) colonized by an ericoid fungus (arrow), a single layer of cortical cells (C), the endodermis (E), the vascular cylinder (VC). (<b>d</b>) Light microscope observation of a <span class="html-italic">V. myrtillus</span> hair root colonized by <span class="html-italic">O. maius</span>; the typical coils formed by the fungus inside the root epidermal cells can be seen (cotton blue staining). (<b>e</b>) Morphology of a densely intertwined intracellular fungal coil; the outer tangential wall of the epidermal cells is very thick. The intracellular hyphae are separated from the cytoplasm of the epidermal root cell by the plant cell membrane that surrounds the fungal coil (perisymbiotic membrane) and by an interface matrix (modified with permission from [<a href="#B138-horticulturae-10-01326" class="html-bibr">138</a>] (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>); [<a href="#B174-horticulturae-10-01326" class="html-bibr">174</a>] (<b>c</b>); [<a href="#B175-horticulturae-10-01326" class="html-bibr">175</a>] (<b>e</b>)). (<b>f</b>) Microcuttings (the insertion on the upper left corner) derived from <span class="html-italic">in vitro</span> cultured <span class="html-italic">R. fortunei</span> grown on a sterilized peat-based substrate non-inoculated (CK) and inoculated with an <span class="html-italic">O. maius</span> strain. (<b>g</b>) Ex vitro rooting of <span class="html-italic">R. fortunei</span> microcuttings non-inoculated (CK) and inoculated with an <span class="html-italic">O. maius</span> strain three months after being transplanted to 10-centimeter diameter containers. (<b>h</b>) Plant hair roots after washing away the substrate ((<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>): modified with permission from [<a href="#B167-horticulturae-10-01326" class="html-bibr">167</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2329 KiB  
Article
Carbon Metabolic Profiling as a Response to Previous Plant Mycotrophy and Soil Disturbance in Wheat Growth
by Taiana Conceição, Galdino Andrade and Isabel Brito
Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 4(4), 1661-1676; https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol4040113 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 566
Abstract
Soil microorganisms play a significant role in the dynamic regulation of organic matter in soils. To assess the influence of agricultural practices on soil functional profiling, we examined the effect of soil disturbance and plant sequence with different levels of mycotrophy on wheat [...] Read more.
Soil microorganisms play a significant role in the dynamic regulation of organic matter in soils. To assess the influence of agricultural practices on soil functional profiling, we examined the effect of soil disturbance and plant sequence with different levels of mycotrophy on wheat microbiomes metabolism. Soil samples were analyzed with community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) using Biolog™ Ecoplates. The results of average well color development (AWCD) showed that the degree of mycotrophy of preceding crop and soil disturbance affected the soil microbiome, although no impact on Shannon Evenness Index was observed during the experiment. The Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index showed variations among the different preceding plants, but not in wheat analysis. The pattern of the C sources metabolism also changed differentially regarding plant type and soil disturbance during the experiment, being also different within the highly mycotrophic plants (legume and grass). In the legume, an increase in the metabolism of amine/amides and phenolic acids was observed, whilst in the grass, an increase in the metabolism of phosphate-carbons (P carbon) and carbohydrates was more evident. Principal component analysis showed that a grouping in the distinct phases of the experiment correlated with the widening of the metabolism of amino acids, carboxylic acids, and carbohydrates. The results indicate that soil functional community structure reflects soil agricultural practice conditions. Previous plant types and soil disturbance impacted the soil microbiome metabolic response (AWCD) in wheat, generating different patterns of carbon metabolism related to previous plant mycotrophy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiome in Ecosystem, 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental design; ERM: extra radicular mycelium.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Heat map of optical density (O.D.) of C-type. Phase 1 from 1 to 7: 1—Soil before plant, 2—<span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> after plant, 3—<span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> after plant, 4—<span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> after plant, 5—<span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> after disturbance, 6—<span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> after disturbance, and 7—<span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> after disturbance. Phase 2 from 8 to 14: 8—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> in soil undisturbed, 9—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> in soil disturbed, 10—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> in soil undisturbed, 11—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> in soil disturbed, 12—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> in soil undisturbed, 13—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> in soil disturbed, and 14—wheat growth with no previous plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Heat map of optical density (O.D.) of C source. Phase 1 from 1 to 7: 1—Soil before plant, 2—<span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> after plant, 3—<span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> after plant, 4—<span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> after plant, 5—<span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> after disturbance, 6—<span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> after disturbance, and 7—<span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> after disturbance. Phase 2 from 8 to 14: 8—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> in soil undisturbed, 9—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span> in soil disturbed, 10—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> in soil undisturbed, 11—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span> in soil disturbed, 12—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> in soil undisturbed, 13—wheat growth after <span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span> in soil disturbed, and 14—wheat growth with no previous plants. For the full names of the carbon sources please check Table 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Score plot of the principal component analysis (PCA) of the C-type and (<b>b</b>) biplot of the PCA showing the C-type. Soil samples: BS—soil before plant; AP—after plant; AD—after disturbance; AWU—after wheat undisturbed treatment; AWD—after wheat disturbed treatment, and NPW—no plant before wheat. Plants: L—<span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span>; O—<span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span>; S—<span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Score plot of the principal component analysis (PCA) of the C source and (<b>b</b>) biplot of the PCA showing the C source. Soil samples: BS—soil before plant; AP—after plant; AD—after disturbance; AWU—after wheat undisturbed treatment; AWD—after wheat disturbed treatment, and NPW—no plant before wheat. Plants: L—<span class="html-italic">L. rigidum</span>; O—<span class="html-italic">O. compressus</span>; S—<span class="html-italic">S. gallica</span>.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1193 KiB  
Article
Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Confers Salinity Tolerance to Medicago sativa L.
by Malena Achiary, Camila Victoria Chiroli, Maria Cecilia Pacheco Insausti, Laura Virginia Gallardo, Ivana Tamara Ponce and Hilda Elizabeth Pedranzani
Stresses 2024, 4(4), 752-761; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040049 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 552
Abstract
Alfalfa, a crop cultivated worldwide for use as livestock feed, exhibits great adaptability to various environmental conditions. This study evaluates the biomass production, lipid peroxidation, photosynthetic pigments and osmo-compatible response in Medicago sativa var CW660 mycorrhizae (AM) and non-mycorrhizae (NM) plants with Rhizophagus [...] Read more.
Alfalfa, a crop cultivated worldwide for use as livestock feed, exhibits great adaptability to various environmental conditions. This study evaluates the biomass production, lipid peroxidation, photosynthetic pigments and osmo-compatible response in Medicago sativa var CW660 mycorrhizae (AM) and non-mycorrhizae (NM) plants with Rhizophagus intraradices and when subjected to salinity (100 mM and 200 mM of NaCl). They were evaluated using the following morphological parameters: foliage fresh weight (FFW), foliage dry weight (FDW), root fresh weight (RFW), root dry weight (RDW), foliage length (FL) and root length (RL), chlorophylls a and b, proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) in AM and NM plants treated with different concentration of NaCl. The LFW and the LDW were higher in M plants. The RFW and the RDW increased in control AM plants, and under different saline treatments there were no differences between AM and NM in either parameter. FL increased in the control and at 100 mM of NaCl in M plants. Chlorophyll a decreased 27–30% and b decreased 1–50% in AM and NM plants at 200 mM NaCl. The proline level increased four times and promoted a defense in AM plants at 200 mM of NaCl. Lipid peroxidation decreased in AM plants by 10% at maximum salinity. M. sativa CW660 is sensitive to salinity stress, and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) regulates its physiology and performance under such conditions, with osmotic protection and membrane protection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Germination energy and (<b>B</b>) germination power of <span class="html-italic">M. sativa</span> L. var. CW660 in control, 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl, both in mycorrhizal (AM) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) seeds. Different letters mean significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Chlorophyll a (<b>A</b>) and chlorophyll b (<b>B</b>) (µg/mL) in <span class="html-italic">M. sativa</span> L. var. CW660 plants under control, 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Different letters mean significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05), as determined by the ANOVA test (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Proline in ug/mL (<b>A</b>) and malondialdehyde (nmol MDA/g FW) (<b>B</b>) in shoots of NM and AM <span class="html-italic">M. sativa</span> L. var. CW660 plants under non-stress (control), 100 mM NaCl and 200 mM NaCl conditions. Different letters mean significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Experimental unit (pots) layout. NM: No mycorrhiza; AM: arbuscular mycorrhiza.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1958 KiB  
Article
Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Affect Soil Nitrogen Fertilizer Utilization, Denitrification Functional Genes, and N2O Emissions During Biochar Amendment
by Yanfang Wang, Jing Liu, Xuxian Deng, Yuyang Li, Jiakai Gao and Ling Liu
Agronomy 2024, 14(11), 2627; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112627 - 7 Nov 2024
Viewed by 680
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can form symbionts with plant roots, acquire soil nitrogen, and affect nitrous oxide (N2O) production. Biochar, as a soil additive for the management of agricultural soil, affects soil nitrogen (N) utilization and plant growth. However, how AMF [...] Read more.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can form symbionts with plant roots, acquire soil nitrogen, and affect nitrous oxide (N2O) production. Biochar, as a soil additive for the management of agricultural soil, affects soil nitrogen (N) utilization and plant growth. However, how AMF regulates soil N unitization, the denitrification process, and N2O emissions in plant–soil systems remains largely unknown, particularly under the biochar amendment. In this study, a microcosm experiment was conducted to investigate the impacts of different mycorrhizal treatments (CK: neither AMF hyphae nor plant roots; AMF: only AMF hyphae; AMF + R: AMF hyphae and plant roots) on plant growth, soil N fertilizer utilization, N2O production and consumption, functional gene abundance, and N2O emission at two biochar addition levels (B0: no biochar; B1: biochar addition rate of 10 g·kg−1 soil) in a maize planting soil system. The results revealed that AMF alone and AMF with plant root treatments enhanced the fresh weight of maize plants by 10.15% and 19.23% and decreased soil inorganic N contents by 33.28% and 75.56%, respectively. The combination of biochar, AMF, and plant roots showed the largest increase in maize plant biomass. The AMF and AMF with root treatments all significantly decreased the nirS + nirK/nosZ ratio and N2O emissions at two biochar levels. The presence of AMF and plant roots during biochar amendment showed the smallest nirS + nirK/nosZ ratio and N2O emissions. The AMF combined with biochar and AMF and plant roots combined with biochar treatments increased nirS + nirK/nosZ by 24.32% and 26.90% and decreased N2O accumulation emission by 21.12% and 38.13%, respectively. The results imply that biochar, AMF, and plant roots reduced N2O emissions directly by reducing soil N and increasing soil N unitization efficiency and indirectly by shifting the N2O production and consumption gene abundance in agroecosystems. These findings suggest that the addition of biochar and AMF and/or the presence of plant roots can interact to alleviate soil N2O emissions by manipulating plant inorganic N acquisition and the soil denitrification process. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of root compartments. The plexiglass mesocosms (45 cm length, 15 cm width, 18 cm depth) were constructed and separated into three identical compartments by different mesh membrane sizes to create different mycorrhizal treatments: (<b>A</b>) 0.45 μm pore size nylon mesh (neither AMF nor plant roots); (<b>B</b>) 20 μm pore size nylon mesh (only AMF hyphae can grow through); (<b>C</b>) 1.6 mm pore size nylon mesh (AMF hyphae and plant roots can penetrate through). Host compartments with growing maize and test compartments with N<sub>2</sub>O collection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of biochar input, AMF, and roots on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission flux. Values are means ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4) at any given time point. (<b>A</b>) No biochar application; (<b>B</b>) biochar application.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of biochar input, AMF, and roots on soil total N<sub>2</sub>O emission. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). B0, no biochar application; B1, biochar application. Different letters among the treatments indicated the significance according to Duncan’s LSD test at 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of biochar input, AMF, and roots on soil <span class="html-italic">nir</span>K (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">nir</span>S (<b>B</b>), and <span class="html-italic">nos</span>Z (<b>C</b>) gene copy numbers and <span class="html-italic">nir</span>S + <span class="html-italic">nir</span>K/<span class="html-italic">nosZ</span> ratio (<b>D</b>). Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). B0, no biochar application; B1, biochar application. Different letters among the treatments indicated the significance according to Duncan’s LSD test at 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationships among plant biomass, soil inorganic N, denitrification gene abundance, AMF, and soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission. ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2946 KiB  
Article
Combination of Silicate-Based Soil Conditioners with Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms to Improve Drought Stress Resilience in Potato
by Abdullah Al Mamun, Günter Neumann, Narges Moradtalab, Aneesh Ahmed, Fahim Nawaz, Timotheus Tenbohlen, Jingyu Feng, Yongbin Zhang, Xiaochan Xie, Li Zhifang, Uwe Ludewig, Klára Bradáčová and Markus Weinmann
Microorganisms 2024, 12(11), 2128; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112128 - 24 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1193
Abstract
Due to shallow root systems, potato is a particularly drought-sensitive crop. To counteract these limitations, the application of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) is discussed as a strategy to improve nutrient acquisition and biotic and abiotic stress resilience. However, initial root colonization by PGPMs, [...] Read more.
Due to shallow root systems, potato is a particularly drought-sensitive crop. To counteract these limitations, the application of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) is discussed as a strategy to improve nutrient acquisition and biotic and abiotic stress resilience. However, initial root colonization by PGPMs, in particular, can be affected by stress factors that negatively impact root growth and activity or the survival of PGPMs in the rhizosphere. In this study, perspectives for the use of commercial silicate-based soil conditioners (SCs) supposed to improve soil water retention were investigated. The SC products were based on combinations with lignocellulose polysaccharides (Sanoplant® = SP) or polyacrylate (Geohumus® = GH). It was hypothesized that SC applications would support beneficial plant–inoculant interactions (arbuscular mycorrhiza, AM: Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL41833, and Pseudomonas brassicacearum 3Re2-7) on a silty loam soil–sand mixture under water-deficit conditions (6–12 weeks at 15–20% substrate water-holding capacity, WHC). Although no significant SC effects on WHC and total plant biomass were detectable, the SC-inoculant combinations increased the proportion of leaf biomass not affected by drought stress symptoms (chlorosis, necrosis) by 66% (SP) and 91% (GH). Accordingly, osmotic adjustment (proline, glycine betaine accumulation) and ROS detoxification (ascorbate peroxidase, total antioxidants) were increased. This was associated with elevated levels of phytohormones involved in stress adaptations (abscisic, jasmonic, salicylic acids, IAA) and reduced ROS (H2O2) accumulation in the leaf tissue. In contrast to GH, the SP treatments additionally stimulated AM root colonization. Finally, the SP-inoculant combination significantly increased tuber biomass (82%) under well-watered conditions, and a similar trend was observed under drought stress, reaching 81% of the well-watered control. The P status was sufficient for all treatments, and no treatment differences were observed for stress-protective nutrients, such as Zn, Mn, or Si. By contrast, GH treatments had negative effects on tuber biomass, associated with excess accumulation of Mn and Fe in the leaf tissue close to toxicity levels. The findings suggest that inoculation with the PGPMs in combination with SC products (SP) can promote physiological stress adaptations and AM colonization to improve potato tuber yield, independent of effects on soil water retention. However, this does not apply to SC products in general. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rhizosphere Microbial Community, 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Plant habitus (<b>right</b>) and fresh plant biomass (<b>left</b>) with proportions (%) of undamaged leaves in potato plants after recovery from a 34 d drought stress period with and without application of microbial inoculants (<span class="html-italic">Rhizophagus irregularis</span> MUCL41833 = AM; <span class="html-italic">Pseudomonas brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7 = 3Re27) and silicatic soil conditioners (Sanoplant = SP; Geohumus = GH). Means and SE of five replicates. Different lowercase characters above the bars indicate significant differences in shoot biomass (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Extraradical AM hyphae (<span class="html-italic">Rhizophagus irregularis</span> MUCL41833 = AM; <span class="html-italic">Pseudomonas brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7 = 3Re27) and silicatic soil conditioners (Sanoplant = SP; Geohumus = GH). Different lowercase characters above the bars indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>AM root colonization of potato plants exposed to drought stress with and without (AM = <span class="html-italic">Rhizophagus irregularis</span> MUCL41833, 3Re27 = <span class="html-italic">Pseudomonas brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7, and silicatic soil conditioner Geohumus and NoSC = without soil conditioner). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of microbial inoculants and Geohumus (<b>a</b>) H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, (<b>b</b>) total antioxidants, (<b>c</b>) APX activity, (<b>d</b>) proline, and (<b>e</b>) glycine betaine accumulation of potato leaves two weeks after drought stress recovery (AM = <span class="html-italic">R. irregularis</span> MUCL 41833, 3Re: = P. <span class="html-italic">brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7, and GH: Geohumus). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of microbial inoculants and Geohumus on (<b>a</b>) IAA, (<b>b</b>) ABA, (<b>c</b>) JA, and (<b>d</b>) SA concentrations in leaf tissues of potato under well-watered conditions (black bars) and two weeks after drought stress recovery (gray bars). AM = <span class="html-italic">R. irregularis</span> MUCL 41833, 3Re: <span class="html-italic">P. brassicacearum</span> = 3Re2-7, and GH: Geohumus. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of microbial inoculants and Sanoplant on potato fresh tuber biomass (g plant<sup>−1</sup>) and number of tubers and stolons per plant under well-watered and drought stress conditions (AMF = <span class="html-italic">R. irregularis</span> MUCL 41833, 3Re27 = <span class="html-italic">P. brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7, and soil conditioner Sanoplant). Different characters within the same row indicate significant differences between means (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of microbial inoculants and Sanoplant on leaves. (<b>a</b>) H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, (<b>b</b>) total antioxidants, (<b>c</b>) APX activity, (<b>d</b>) proline, and (<b>e</b>) glycine betaine of potato (AM = <span class="html-italic">R. irregularis</span> MUCL 41833, 3Re27 = <span class="html-italic">P. brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7, SP = Sanoplant). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of microbial inoculants and Geohumus on (<b>a</b>) IAA, (<b>b</b>) ABA, (<b>c</b>) JA, and (<b>d</b>) SA concentrations in leaf tissues of potato under well-watered conditions (black bars) and two weeks after drought stress recovery (gray bars). AM = <span class="html-italic">Rhizophagus irregularis</span> MUCL 41833, 3Re27 = <span class="html-italic">P. brassicacearum</span> 3Re2-7, SP = Sanoplant). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 3117 KiB  
Article
Using Nanomaterials and Arbuscular mycorrhizas to Alleviate Saline–Alkali Stress in Cyperus esculentus (L.)
by Jixing Diao, Yi Tang, Yu Jiang, Hailian Sun and Chuan-Jie Zhang
Agronomy 2024, 14(11), 2476; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112476 - 23 Oct 2024
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Saline–alkali (SA) stress is an abiotic stress that exists widely in the natural environment, seriously affecting the growth and development of crops. Tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.), a perennial herb of Cyperus in Cyperaceae, is considered a pioneer crop for growing [...] Read more.
Saline–alkali (SA) stress is an abiotic stress that exists widely in the natural environment, seriously affecting the growth and development of crops. Tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.), a perennial herb of Cyperus in Cyperaceae, is considered a pioneer crop for growing and improving SA land due to its excellent adaptability and SA tolerance. This study is the first to evaluate the SA tolerance of tiger nut and the alleviative effects of nanomaterials (nano-selenium and multi-walled carbon nanotubes) and Arbuscular mycorrhizas (AMs) on SA stress. The results showed that the seedling fresh weight of tiger nut was the most suitable parameter to describe the dose–response effect of plant growth with increased SA concentration. Based on the log-logistic dose–response curve, the GR50 values of NaCl and NaHCO3 (the concentrations causing a 50% reduction in seedling fresh weight) were determined to be 163 mmol L−1 and 63 mmol L−1, respectively. Under these stresses, the exogenous application of MWCNTs at 100 mg L−1 or Nano-Se at 10 mg L−1 showed that the effect of SA on tiger nut was alleviated. Field evaluation further showed that the exogenous application of MWCNTs, Nano-Se, or AMs could effectively alleviate SA stress on tiger nut. Compared to the untreated control, the application of these substances significantly improved the plant photosynthesis-related parameter, antioxidant enzyme activity, plant height (height: 66.0–69.9 cm), tuber yield (yield: 23.4–27.4 g plant−1), and oil quality of tiger nut under SA stress. The results of this study indicate that the application of MWCNTs, Nano-Se, or AMs, to tiger nut can alleviate SA stress and maintain seed yield, providing the possibility of using these nanoparticles to improve the SA tolerance of tiger nut in agricultural practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Monthly air temperature, soil temperature, and accumulated precipitation during the experimental period of 2022–2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dose–responses curves of seedling growth parameters of tiger nut in relation to different NaCl (<b>A</b>) and NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (<b>B</b>) concentrations in the pot-planting test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of various treatments on Fv/Fm (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and chlorophyll content (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT50 or 100: 50 or 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe200 or 400: 10 or 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT50 or 100-Na<sup>+</sup>: root-applied with NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of MWCNTs at 50 or 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT50 or 100-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root-applied with NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of MWCNTs at 50 or 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe200 or 400-Na<sup>+</sup>: root-applied by NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of Nano-Se at 10 or 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe200 or 400-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root-applied with NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of Nano-Se at 10 or 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of various treatments on the plant height (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), fresh weight (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), and dry weight (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT50 or 100: 50 or 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe200 or 400: 10 or 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT50 or 100-Na<sup>+</sup>: root-applied with NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of MWCNTs at 50 or 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT50 or 100-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root-applied with NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of MWCNTs at 50 or 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe200 or 400-Na<sup>+</sup>: root-applied by NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of Nano-Se at 10 or 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe200 or 400-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root-applied with NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) + foliar spraying of Nano-Se at 10 or 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of various treatments on the F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and chlorophyll content (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT: 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe: 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; AM: coating inoculation treatment; MWCNT-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at a concentration of 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at concentration 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. AM-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM; AM-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of various treatments (see previous figure legends) on the SOD activity (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and CAT activity (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT: 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe: 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; AM: coating inoculation treatment; MWCNT-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at a concentration of 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at concentration 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. AM-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM; AM-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of various treatments on the relative conductivity (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and MDA content (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT: 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe: 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; AM: coating inoculation treatment; MWCNT-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at a concentration of 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at concentration 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. AM-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM; AM-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effects of various treatments on the soluble protein (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and proline content (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT: 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe: 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; AM: coating inoculation treatment; MWCNT-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at a concentration of 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at concentration 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. AM-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM; AM-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effects of various treatments on the NDF (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), ADF (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), and crude protein content (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT: 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe: 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; AM: coating inoculation treatment; MWCNT-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at a concentration of 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at concentration 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. AM-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM; AM-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effects of various treatments on the plant height (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), total grain weight (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), and oil content (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) of tiger nut under SA stress. Con.: untreated control; NaCl: 163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>: 63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT: 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe: 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; AM: coating inoculation treatment; MWCNT-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at a concentration of 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; MWCNT-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of MWCNTs at concentration 100 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>; NanoSe-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by foliar spraying of Nano-Se at a concentration of 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. AM-Na<sup>+</sup>: root application of NaCl (163 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM; AM-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>: root application of NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (63 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) was followed by inoculating AM. Values are means (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 7063 KiB  
Article
Microbiomes-Plant Interactions and K-Humate Application for Salinity Stress Mitigation and Yield Enhancement in Wheat and Faba Bean in Egypt’s Northeastern Delta
by Soha S. M. Mostafa, Clair N. Fares, Mounira M. Bishara, Clara R. Azzam, Adel A. Awad, Naayem M. M. Elgaml and Mohamed S. M. Mostafa
Int. J. Plant Biol. 2024, 15(4), 1077-1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15040076 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 775
Abstract
Salinity, resulting from climate change and excessive mineral fertilization, burdens farmers and negatively impacts soil and water ecosystems in the Northeastern Nile Delta. Organic and biological approaches are crucial for addressing these issues. This study examined the effects of individual and combined inoculations [...] Read more.
Salinity, resulting from climate change and excessive mineral fertilization, burdens farmers and negatively impacts soil and water ecosystems in the Northeastern Nile Delta. Organic and biological approaches are crucial for addressing these issues. This study examined the effects of individual and combined inoculations with cyanobacteria, yeast, and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), with or without K-Humate and reducing Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) mineral fertilizers application rates to crop quality of wheat and faba bean. In preliminary laboratory experiments, the interactive effects of these microbiomes on plant antioxidant and soil enzyme production were examined under salinity stress. Results showed that co-inoculation, especially with K-Humate, yielded superior outcomes compared to individual inoculations. These findings were validated by a field trial conducted in saline-alkaline soil in the Northeastern Nile Delta region. All biological treatments 25% of recommended doses, and enhancing salinity tolerance, increasing yield, and improving enhanced rhizosphere microbial activity, including soil enzyme activity, AMF colonization, spore density, and the total numbers of bacteria, cyanobacteria, and yeast. These effects were further amplified by K-Humate and were more pronounced with combined inoculations than with individual ones, leading to improved soil fertility and significant increases in both crop quantity and quality compared to control treatments. The triple treatment, combining cyanobacteria, yeast, and mycorrhizae in the presence of K-Humate while reducing the mineral NPK rate by 75%, achieved superior increases in the productivity of wheat grains and faba bean seeds, reaching 54.72% and 128.92%, respectively, compared to the 100% NPK mineral control. This treatment also significantly improved crop quality, with notable increases in nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, and protein percentages in wheat grains and faba bean seeds. Microbiomes-interaction increased potassium uptake over sodium, enhancing the plant’s potassium/sodium ratio and improving salt stress tolerance. This approach reduces reliance on costly mineral fertilizers, enabling bio-organic farming in marginal lands, optimizing resource utilization, and preserving natural resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant–Microorganisms Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Field experiment site in the northeast Nile Delta, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. (<b>A</b>) Location of the experimental sites at Khaled ben El-Waleed village; (<b>B</b>) Experimental plots before and after the growth of faba bean and wheat under salinity conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Impact of exogenous microbiomes and K-H on faba bean seedling growth after 30-day experiment under salinity stress. (<b>A</b>) An image of faba bean seedlings. The treatments are as follows: (1) Control, (2) Cyanobacteria (Cyano), (3) Yeast (Y), (4) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), (5) K-Humate (K-H), (6) Cyano + Y, (7) Cyano + AMF, (8) Y + AMF, (9) Cyano + Y + AMF, (10) Cyano + K-H, (11) Y + K-H, (12) AMF + K-H, (13) Cyano + Y + K-H, (14) Cyano + AMF + K-H, (15) Y + AMF + K-H, (16) Cyano + Y + AMF + K-H. (<b>B</b>) faba bean shoot length, root length, and root-to-shoot ratio. Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of exogenous microbiomes and K-H on wheat seedling growth and morphology after 30-days experiment under salinity stress. (<b>A</b>) Visual assessment of wheat seedling morphology. The treatments are as follows: (1) Control, (2) Cyanobacteria (Cyano), (3) Yeast (Y), (4) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), (5) K-Humate (K-H), (6) Cyano + Y, (7) Cyano + AMF, (8) Y + AMF, (9) Cyano + Y + AMF, (10) Cyano + K-H, (11) Y + K-H, (12) AMF + K-H, (13) Cyano + Y + K-H, (14) Cyano + AMF + K-H, (15) Y + AMF + K-H, (16) Cyano + Y + AMF + K-H. (<b>B</b>) Shoot length, root length, and root-to-shoot ratio in wheat seedlings. Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns and curve indicate statistically significant differences between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” represents the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effect of different microbiomes treatments and K-H on catalase (CAT) activity in faba bean (<b>upper</b>) and wheat seedlings (<b>bottom</b>). Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effect of different microbiomes treatments and K-H on peroxidase (POD) activity in faba bean (<b>upper</b>) and wheat seedlings (<b>bottom</b>). Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The effect of different microbiomes treatments and K-H on dehydrogenase (DHA-ase) activity in faba bean (<b>upper</b>) and wheat seedlings (<b>bottom</b>). Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>The effect of different microbiomes treatments and K-H on dehydrogenase (DHA-ase) activity in faba bean (<b>upper</b>) and wheat seedlings (<b>bottom</b>). Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The effect of different microbiome treatments and K-H on nitrogenase (N-ase) activity in faba bean (<b>upper</b>) and wheat seedlings (<b>bottom</b>). Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>The effect of different microbiome treatments and K-H on nitrogenase (N-ase) activity in faba bean (<b>upper</b>) and wheat seedlings (<b>bottom</b>). Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns indicate significant difference between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” indicates the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Influence of bio-inoculation and K-H on AMF infection rate and spore densities in the rhizosphere of wheat (<b>upper</b>) and faba bean (<b>bottom</b>) after 45 days, 75 days, and post-harvest. Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns and curve indicate statistically significant differences between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” represents the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effect of Treatments on K/Na Ratio and Percentages of Protein, Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), and Sodium (Na) in Faba Bean Seeds. Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns and curves indicate statistically significant differences between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” represents the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of Treatments on K/Na Ratio and Percentages of Protein, Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), and Sodium (Na) in Wheat Grains. Different letters (a, b, c, etc.) above the columns and curve indicate statistically significant differences between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). The letter “a” represents the highest significant value, followed by letters in descending order of significance.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 1
<p>In vitro experimental design illustrating the application of microbial and K-Humate treatments to faba bean and wheat plants under salinity stress and mineral NPK deficiency. The dotted arrows in the scheme illustrate the pathways of each treatment applied to the plants. Each arrow indicates the specific interactions between the treatments and the plants, highlighting their contributions to the overall experimental design.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 2
<p>Experimental Design for Assessing the Effects of Biostimulants on Faba Bean and Wheat Yields Under Saline-Alkaline Conditions. The dotted arrows in the scheme represent the interactions between various treatments applied to the plants, indicating their pathways and contributions to the overall experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1026 KiB  
Article
Inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Supports the Uptake of Macronutrients and Promotes the Growth of Festuca ovina L. and Trifolium medium L., a Candidate Species for Green Urban Infrastructure
by Alicja Szada-Borzyszkowska, Jacek Krzyżak, Szymon Rusinowski, Franco Magurno and Marta Pogrzeba
Plants 2024, 13(18), 2620; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182620 - 19 Sep 2024
Viewed by 976
Abstract
Green roofs and walls play an important role in promoting biodiversity, reducing the urban heat island effect and providing ecosystem services in urban areas. However, the conditions on green walls/roofs (low nutrient and organic matter content, drought, high temperatures) are often unfavorable for [...] Read more.
Green roofs and walls play an important role in promoting biodiversity, reducing the urban heat island effect and providing ecosystem services in urban areas. However, the conditions on green walls/roofs (low nutrient and organic matter content, drought, high temperatures) are often unfavorable for plant growth. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve the growth and development of plants under stress conditions as they can increase nutrient and water uptake. In a 6-month pot experiment, we investigated the effect of AMF inoculation on the growth and NPK uptake of Festuca ovina L. and Trifolium medium L., which are used for green roofs and walls. Two variants of mycorrhizal inoculation were used in the experiment: a commercial mycorrhizal inoculant AM Symbivit (Symbiom Ltd., Lanskroun, Czech Republic) and a mycorrhizal inoculant collected from calcareous grassland in the Silesia region (Poland). Funneliformis mosseae was the most abundant species in the roots of F. ovina and T. medium with IM inoculum. In the CM variant, a dominance of F. mosseae was observed in the roots of F. ovina. In contrast, Archaeosporaceae sp. node 317 dominated in the roots of T. medium. Both inoculations had a positive effect on the increase in dry weight of the shoots of T. medium, but only the commercial inoculum had a positive effect on the growth of F. ovina. Both inoculations improved the P uptake by the roots and the P and K uptake into the shoots of T. medium. In addition, both inoculations improved the K uptake by the roots of F. ovina and the N, P and K uptake into the shoots. In conclusion, both AMF communities included in the inoculations had a positive effect on plant growth and nutrient uptake, but the effect depends on the plant and the mycorrhizal fungus species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Protection and Biotic Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Parameters of mycorrhizal colonization in <span class="html-italic">Festuca ovina</span> and <span class="html-italic">Trifolium medium</span> roots: (<b>a</b>) F—frequency of mycorrhiza in the root system, (<b>b</b>) M—relative mycorrhizal intensity in the root system, (<b>c</b>) A—relative abundance of arbuscules in the root system, IM—inoculum with mycorrhiza from the calcareous grassland, CM—commercial mycorrhizal inoculum. Values are means ± SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5. Lowercase letters denote significant differences between different experimental treatments and Uppercase letters denote significant differences between species for specific parameters, according to the Fisher LSD test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Composition of the AMF communities in <span class="html-italic">Festuca ovina</span> and <span class="html-italic">Trifolium medium</span> roots. IM—inoculum with mycorrhiza from the calcareous grassland; CM—commercial mycorrhizal inoculum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The principal component analysis for <span class="html-italic">Festuca ovina</span> (Fo) and <span class="html-italic">Trifolium medium</span> (Tm), cultivated in soil substrate without inoculation (C), with inoculum originated from calcareous grassland environment (IM) and with commercially available inoculum (CM). Abbreviations for correlation PCA: DM—shoot dry matter, Ps—P shoot content, Pr—P root content, Ns—N shoot content, Nr—N root content, Ks—K shoot content, Kr—K root content, F%—mycorrhizal frequency, M%—relative mycorrhizal intensity, A%—relative abundance of arbuscules, FunMos—<span class="html-italic">Funneliformis mosseae</span> richness, DomDuo—<span class="html-italic">Dominikia duoreactiva</span> richness, DomDif—<span class="html-italic">Dominikia difficilevidera</span> richness, DomAur—<span class="html-italic">Dominikia aurea</span> richness, Mic553—<span class="html-italic">Microkamienskia</span> sp. node 553 richness, POL2—<span class="html-italic">Polonosporaceae</span> POL2 richness, Cla388—<span class="html-italic">Claroideoglomus</span> sp. node 388 richness, Cla363—<span class="html-italic">Claroideoglomus</span> sp. node 363 richness, ClaCan—<span class="html-italic">Claroideoglomus candidum</span> richness, Cla394—<span class="html-italic">Claroideoglomus</span> sp. node 394 richness, Glo400—<span class="html-italic">Glomeromycota</span> sp. node 400 richness, ClaDru—<span class="html-italic">Claroideoglomus</span> cf. <span class="html-italic">Drummondii</span> richness, ArcTra—<span class="html-italic">Archaeospora trappei</span> richness and Arc317—<span class="html-italic">Archaeosporaceae</span> sp. node 317 richness.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 2718 KiB  
Article
The Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Trees on the Diversity of Forest Communities Worldwide Are Greater than Those of Ectotrophic Mycorrhiza Trees
by Zihao Li, Wenxin Liu, Xinyu Xue, Rui Qi, Xueying Li, Qian Li, Nuonuo Xu, Fengqin Liu, Yizhen Shao, Yongzhong Ye, Yun Chen, Dongwei Wei and Zhiliang Yuan
Diversity 2024, 16(9), 587; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090587 - 17 Sep 2024
Viewed by 957
Abstract
The interaction between woody plants and mycorrhizal fungi is an important biological interaction; however, the driving factors behind the diversity of mycorrhizal trees formed through the symbiosis of mycorrhizal fungi and woody plants remain unclear. In this study, we collected and compiled the [...] Read more.
The interaction between woody plants and mycorrhizal fungi is an important biological interaction; however, the driving factors behind the diversity of mycorrhizal trees formed through the symbiosis of mycorrhizal fungi and woody plants remain unclear. In this study, we collected and compiled the woody plant data of 34 forest dynamic plots containing 3350 species from habitats around the world and divided them into AM and EcM trees. We tested the contribution of AM and EcM trees to tree diversity and its components in forest communities worldwide. Our results showed that AM trees rather than EcM trees affect the tree diversity of forest communities, and that the diversity of AM trees has a significant latitudinal gradient pattern. Climate variables, especially temperature, are strongly correlated with the diversity patterns for AM trees rather than EcM trees. Topography is the most significant factor affecting the diversity of EcM trees. Our findings highlight the importance of AM trees for the tree diversity of forest communities worldwide. Our findings have important implications for understanding the response of complex woody plant communities with different types of mycorrhizal symbiosis to climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Insect-Microbe Interactions and Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Global distribution of 34 forest plots. (<b>b</b>) PCA of woody plants in different climatic zones (Red dashed lines represent temperate zone, blue dashed subtropical zone and black dashed tropical zone). (<b>c</b>) Diversity of AM and EcM trees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of environment on the richness of the different types of mycorrhizal trees. The blue line represents AM trees, and the red line represents EcM trees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>NMDS of the species composition of woody plants with different mycorrhizae. The black circles represent tropical zones, blue circles represent tropical zones, and purple circles represent tropical zones. The brown arrows represent insignificance, and blue arrows represent significance. HA (maximum altitude, m), LE (minimum altitude, m), ME (mean altitude, m), MS (mean slope, °), MTWM (the warmest month temperature, °C), MTCM (the coldest month temperature, °C), MAT (the annual mean temperature, °C), PDM (the driest month precipitation, mm), PWM (the wettest month precipitation, mm), and MAP (the annual mean precipitation, mm). The same below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of the best-fitted piecewise structural equation model (SEM) showing the linkages among space, climate, topography, and mycorrhizal tree diversity. The blue and red lines indicate the positive and negative pathways, respectively. Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks. (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). MTWM (the warmest month temperature, °C), MTCM (the coldest month temperature, °C), MAP (the annual mean precipitation, mm), and LE (minimum altitude, m).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop