[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (160)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = cropland extraction

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
31 pages, 13252 KiB  
Article
GLCANet: Global–Local Context Aggregation Network for Cropland Segmentation from Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images
by Jinglin Zhang, Yuxia Li, Zhonggui Tong, Lei He, Mingheng Zhang, Zhenye Niu and Haiping He
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4627; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244627 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 398
Abstract
Cropland is a fundamental basis for agricultural development and a prerequisite for ensuring food security. The segmentation and extraction of croplands using remote sensing images are important measures and prerequisites for detecting and protecting farmland. This study addresses the challenges of diverse image [...] Read more.
Cropland is a fundamental basis for agricultural development and a prerequisite for ensuring food security. The segmentation and extraction of croplands using remote sensing images are important measures and prerequisites for detecting and protecting farmland. This study addresses the challenges of diverse image sources, multi-scale representations of cropland, and the confusion of features between croplands and other land types in large-area remote sensing image information extraction. To this end, a multi-source self-annotated dataset was developed using satellite images from GaoFen-2, GaoFen-7, and WorldView, which was integrated with public datasets GID and LoveDA to create the CRMS dataset. A novel semantic segmentation network, the Global–Local Context Aggregation Network (GLCANet), was proposed. This method integrates the Bilateral Feature Encoder (BFE) of CNNs and Transformers with a global–local information mining module (GLM) to enhance global context extraction and improve cropland separability. It also employs a multi-scale progressive upsampling structure (MPUS) to refine the accuracy of diverse arable land representations from multi-source imagery. To tackle the issue of inconsistent features within the cropland class, a loss function based on hard sample mining and multi-scale features was constructed. The experimental results demonstrate that GLCANet improves OA and mIoU by 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively, compared to the existing advanced networks on the CRMS dataset. Additionally, the proposed method also demonstrated high precision and practicality in segmenting large-area croplands in Chongzhou City, Sichuan Province, China. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Issues present in multi-source remote sensing imagery. (<b>a</b>) Confusion between croplands and similar land cover types. (<b>b</b>) Variability in cropland features caused by different imaging conditions. (<b>c</b>) Variation in cropland scales due to differences in resolution and geographical conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The overall structure of GLCANet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Feature aggregation attention module (FAAM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Structure of the Global–Local Mining Block. (<b>b</b>) Structure of the Global–Local Attention.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Global Connection Compression Module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The multi-scale progressive upsampling structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The structure of feature refinement residual segmentation head (FRRSH).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The structure of Auxiliary Segmentation Head (ASH).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The visualization results of different methods on the multi-source image dataset CRMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Visualization comparison of different methods on the TriCities dataset (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Visualization comparison of different methods on the GID dataset (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The SEG-GRAD-CAM visualization results for different layers of GLCANet. (<b>a</b>) Input image; (<b>b</b>) BFE; (<b>c</b>) the first layer of the GLM Block; (<b>d</b>) the second layer of the GLM Block; (<b>e</b>) the third layer of the GLM Block; (<b>f</b>) ground truth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The impact of hyperparameter α on different datasets. (<b>a</b>) Accuracy of different hyperparameters on the CRMS dataset; (<b>b</b>) Accuracy on the TriCities dataset; (<b>c</b>) Accuracy on the GID dataset; (<b>d</b>) Accuracy on the LoveDA dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The location of Chongzhou City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Chongzhou remote sensing imagery and sampling points. (<b>a</b>) Full-area remote sensing image of Chongzhou; (<b>b</b>) randomly selected sampling points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Extraction results for the Chongzhou Area. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) show the results from the WorldView satellite images from March 2017; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) display the results from May 2020; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) depict the results from August 2023 using the GaoFen-1 satellite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Land cover extraction results for images of Chongzhou City. (<b>a</b>) High-resolution images. (<b>b</b>) Ground truth. (<b>c</b>) Large-area prediction results.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12292 KiB  
Article
Segmentation and Proportion Extraction of Crop, Crop Residues, and Soil Using Digital Images and Deep Learning
by Guangfu Gao, Shanxin Zhang, Jianing Shen, Kailong Hu, Jia Tian, Yihan Yao, Qingjiu Tian, Yuanyuan Fu, Haikuan Feng, Yang Liu and Jibo Yue
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2240; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122240 - 6 Dec 2024
Viewed by 542
Abstract
Conservation tillage involves covering the soil surface with crop residues after harvest, typically through reduced or no-tillage practices. This approach increases the soil organic matter, improves the soil structure, prevents erosion, reduces water loss, promotes microbial activity, and enhances root development. Therefore, accurate [...] Read more.
Conservation tillage involves covering the soil surface with crop residues after harvest, typically through reduced or no-tillage practices. This approach increases the soil organic matter, improves the soil structure, prevents erosion, reduces water loss, promotes microbial activity, and enhances root development. Therefore, accurate information on crop residue coverage is critical for monitoring the implementation of conservation tillage practices. This study collected “crop–crop residues–soil” images from wheat-soybean rotation fields using mobile phones to create calibration, validation, and independent validation datasets. We developed a deep learning model named crop–crop residue–soil segmentation network (CCRSNet) to enhance the performance of cropland “crop–crop residues–soil” image segmentation and proportion extraction. The model enhances the segmentation accuracy and proportion extraction by extracting and integrating shallow and deep image features and attention modules to capture multi-scale contextual information. Our findings indicated that (1) lightweight models outperformed deeper networks for “crop–crop residues–soil” image segmentation. When CCRSNet employed a deep network backbone (ResNet50), its feature extraction capability was inferior to that of lighter models (VGG16). (2) CCRSNet models that integrated shallow and deep features with attention modules achieved a high segmentation and proportion extraction performance. Using VGG16 as the backbone, CCRSNet achieved an mIoU of 92.73% and a PA of 96.23% in the independent validation dataset, surpassing traditional SVM and RF models. The RMSE for the proportion extraction accuracy ranged from 1.05% to 3.56%. These results demonstrate the potential of CCRSNet for the accurate, rapid, and low-cost detection of crop residue coverage. However, the generalizability and robustness of deep learning models depend on the diversity of calibration datasets. Further experiments across different regions and crops are required to validate this method’s accuracy and applicability for “crop–crop residues–soil” image segmentation and proportion extraction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area and experimental sites. (<b>a</b>) Location of the study area. (<b>b</b>) Soybean experimental field. (<b>c</b>) Field “crop–crop residue–soil” digital images, <span class="html-italic">f<sub>CR</sub></span> (crop residue coverage).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Original image and annotated image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Methodology framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CCRSNet architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>mIoU and loss curves of CCRSNet semantic segmentation network with different backbone networks during calibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Visualization of segmentation results for processed images using the CCRSNet model with VGG16 as the backbone network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Visualization of segmentation results for original images using the CCRSNet model with VGG16 as the backbone network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Class activation mapping using the CCRSNet model with VGG16 as the backbone network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Proportion extraction of crop, crop residues, and soil using digital images and deep learning based on the TVD and IVD datasets. (<b>a</b>) crop (TVD-vali). (<b>b</b>) crop residues (TVD-vali). (<b>c</b>) soil (TVD-vali). (<b>d</b>) crop (IVD). (<b>e</b>) crop residues (IVD). (<b>f</b>) soil (IVD).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Ablation experiment architectures. (<b>a</b>) CCRSNet without the deep and shallow feature structure, (<b>b</b>) CCRSNet without the attention module.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 5835 KiB  
Article
Identification of Agricultural Areas to Restore Through Nature-Based Solutions (NbS)
by Beatrice Petti and Marco Ottaviano
Land 2024, 13(11), 1954; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111954 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1029
Abstract
This study aims to present a methodological approach based on the objectives of the Nature Restoration Law and the concept of Forest Landscape Restoration to identify areas that are best suited for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions for the improvement of landscape and [...] Read more.
This study aims to present a methodological approach based on the objectives of the Nature Restoration Law and the concept of Forest Landscape Restoration to identify areas that are best suited for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions for the improvement of landscape and habitat status in the city of Campobasso (1028.64 km2). Using open data (ISPRA ecosystem services and regional land use capability), an expert based approach (questionnaire), and a multicriteria analysis (Analytical Hierarchy Process), the Total Ecosystem Services Value index was determined as a weighted additive sum of the criteria considered. The index was then classified into eight clusters, and the land use “Cropland” was extracted. Cluster 1 croplands (740.09 Ha) were identified as the areas to be allocated to Nature-based Solutions since they were those characterized by fewer ecosystem services provisioning, while Cluster 8 croplands (482.88 Ha) were identified as valuable areas to be preserved. It was then possible to compare the “Forest” areas currently present in the study area with those of a possible future scenario, represented by the areas occupied today by forest with the addition of Cluster 1 croplands. A landscape analysis was conducted; it showed greater dispersion and fragmentation of forest patches in the future scenario, but also greater connectivity and thus greater ecological functionality of the patches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Land Degradation Processes and Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>InVEST maps. (<b>a</b>) CSS; (<b>b</b>) HbQ; (<b>c</b>) AP; (<b>d</b>) Pol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Land capability in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatialized TESV index; (<b>b</b>) Clusters identified with K-means for grids from SAGA GIS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of clusters according to “Croplands”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Cluster 1 detailing those falling under Croplands; (<b>b</b>) Cluster 8 detailing those falling under Croplands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Potential Forest. In red are the newly added areas (cluster 1 Croplands).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Degraded areas and 60 m urban buffer.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5155 KiB  
Article
Impact of Arable Land Abandonment on Crop Production Losses in Ukraine During the Armed Conflict
by Kaixuan Dai, Changxiu Cheng, Siyi Kan, Yaoming Li, Kunran Liu and Xudong Wu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4207; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224207 - 12 Nov 2024
Viewed by 716
Abstract
The outbreak of Russia-Ukraine conflict casted an impact on the global food market, which was believed to be attributed to that Ukraine has suffered significant production losses due to cropland abandonment. Nevertheless, recent outbreaks of farmer protests against Ukraine’s grain exports demonstrated that [...] Read more.
The outbreak of Russia-Ukraine conflict casted an impact on the global food market, which was believed to be attributed to that Ukraine has suffered significant production losses due to cropland abandonment. Nevertheless, recent outbreaks of farmer protests against Ukraine’s grain exports demonstrated that the production losses might not be as severe as previous estimates. By utilizing the adaptive threshold segmentation method to extract abandoned cropland from the Sentinel-2 high-resolution imagery and calibrating the spatial production allocation model’s gridded crop production data from Ukraine’s statistical data, this study explicitly evaluated Ukraine’s crop-specific production losses and the spatial heterogeneity. The results demonstrated that the estimated area of abandoned cropland in Ukraine ranges from 2.34 to 2.40 million hectares, constituting 7.14% to 7.30% of the total cropland. In Ukrainian-controlled zones, this area spans 1.44 to 1.48 million hectares, whereas in Russian-occupied areas, it varies from 0.90 to 0.92 million hectares. Additionally, the total production losses for wheat, maize, barley, and sunflower amount to 1.92, 1.67, 0.70, and 0.99 million tons, respectively, with corresponding loss ratios of 9.10%, 7.48%, 9.54%, and 8.67%. Furthermore, production losses of wheat, barley, and sunflower emerged in both the eastern and southern states adjacent to the conflict frontlines, while maize losses were concentrated in the western states. The findings imply that Ukraine ought to streamline the food transportation channels and maintain stable agricultural activities in regions with high crop production. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The study area. Panel (<b>a</b>) illustrates the geographical location of Ukraine and its neighboring countries. Panel (<b>b</b>) displays the distribution of cropland in Ukraine based on the ESA WorldCover 2020 dataset. Panel (<b>c</b>) depicts Ukraine’s 27 state-level administrations and the controlled regions of both sides during the conflict. Panel (<b>d</b>) illustrates the temporal changes in areas under the control of both parties. In the figure, the red color indicates areas occupied by Russia, while the blue color represents regions recaptured by Ukraine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Evaluation framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The spatial distribution of abandoned cropland. Panel (<b>a</b>) depicts the spatial distribution of abandoned cropland patches, where the red portions indicate abandoned cultivated areas. Panel (<b>b</b>) displays the spatial distribution of the proportion of abandoned cropland area within each grid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calibrated results based on the SPAM grid dataset. Panel (<b>a</b>) represents the proportion of harvested area for each crop relative to the total harvested area. Panel (<b>b</b>) depicts the proportion of each crop’s production to the total production. The X-axis in the figure sequentially represents the original SPAM grid data, actual agricultural statistics data from the past five years, and the calibrated SPAM grid data. In the bar chart, blue represents wheat, red represents maize, gray represents barley, and orange represents sunflower.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of crop production losses. Panels (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent the spatial distribution of production loss for wheat, maize, barley, and sunflower, respectively. Darker red colors indicate higher crop production losses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relationship between grid-level abandonment rate and crop production. Panels (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) depict the spatial clustering patterns of wheat, maize, barley, and sunflower production with the abandonment rate of cropland. In the figure, “H-H” represents high production and high abandonment rate, “L-L” indicates low production and low abandonment rate, “L-H” stands for low production and high abandonment rate, and “H-L” signifies high production and low abandonment rate. Gray grids denote marginal spatial clustering between the two variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The distribution of displaced populations across various states in Ukraine.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6300 KiB  
Article
DDAM-Net: A Difference-Directed Multi-Scale Attention Mechanism Network for Cultivated Land Change Detection
by Junbiao Feng, Haikun Yu, Xiaoping Lu, Xiaoran Lv and Junli Zhou
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 7040; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217040 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 609
Abstract
Declining cultivated land poses a serious threat to food security. However, existing Change Detection (CD) methods are insufficient for overcoming intra-class differences in cropland, and the accumulation of irrelevant features and loss of key features leads to poor detection results. To effectively identify [...] Read more.
Declining cultivated land poses a serious threat to food security. However, existing Change Detection (CD) methods are insufficient for overcoming intra-class differences in cropland, and the accumulation of irrelevant features and loss of key features leads to poor detection results. To effectively identify changes in agricultural land, we propose a Difference-Directed Multi-scale Attention Mechanism Network (DDAM-Net). Specifically, we use a feature extraction module to effectively extract the cropland’s multi-scale features from dual-temporal images, and we introduce a Difference Enhancement Fusion Module (DEFM) and a Cross-scale Aggregation Module (CAM) to pass and fuse the multi-scale and difference features layer by layer. In addition, we introduce the Attention Refinement Module (ARM) to optimize the edge and detail features of changing objects. In the experiments, we evaluated the applicability of DDAM-Net on the HN-CLCD dataset for cropland CD and non-agricultural identification, with F1 and precision of 79.27% and 80.70%, respectively. In addition, generalization experiments using the publicly accessible PX-CLCD and SET-CLCD datasets revealed F1 and precision values of 95.12% and 95.47%, and 72.40% and 77.59%, respectively. The relevant comparative and ablation experiments suggested that DDAM-Net has greater performance and reliability in detecting cropland changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The overall structure of the DDAM-Net network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differential Enhancement Fusion Network (DEFM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>UM is upsampling module (<b>a</b>) and DM downsampling module (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Attention Refinement Module (ARM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The research area’s geographic location and the different satellite coverage of the before and after images. (<b>a</b>) The topographic height of Kaifeng City. (<b>b</b>) Image coverage of Kaifeng City in May 2022. (<b>c</b>) Image coverage of Kaifeng city in October 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>HN-CLCD dataset and its variation types. The area of change is characterized by farmland in the pre-phase and various features such as buildings, sheds, roads, and lakes in the post-phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>PX-CLCD dataset (<b>a</b>) and SET-CLCD dataset (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of change maps of different methods on the HN-CLCD dataset. (1) Greenhouse. (2) Buildings. (3–4) Roads. (5–6) Lakes. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Input bitemporal images. (<b>c</b>) Label. (<b>d</b>–<b>j</b>) Change maps of FC-EF, SNUNet, STANet, LightCD, HCGMNet, CGNet-CD, DDAM-Net. (<b>k</b>) represents a localized zoomed-in view of the box. Green means correct detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Red means missing detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Yellow means false detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of change maps of different methods on the PX-CLCD dataset. (1) Buildings. (2–3) Roads. (4–5) Forest. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Input bitemporal images. (<b>c</b>) Label. (<b>d</b>–<b>j</b>) Change maps of FC-EF, SNUNet, STANet, LightCD, HCGMNet, CGNet-CD, DDAM-Net. (<b>k</b>) represents a localized zoomed-in view of the box. Green means correct detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Red means missing detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Yellow means false detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of change maps of different methods on SET-CLCD dataset. (1)–(3) Large- and small-buildings areas. (4), (5) Unconstructed areas. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Input bitemporal images. (<b>c</b>) Label. (<b>d</b>–<b>j</b>) Change maps of FC-EF, SNUNet, STANet, LightCD, HCGMNet, CGNet-CD, DDAM-Net. (<b>k</b>) represents a localized zoomed-in view of the box. Green means correct detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Red means missing detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Yellow means false detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Quantitative analysis of the performance of different models: (<b>a</b>) shows F1 of the model versus the time required to run the epoch; (<b>b</b>) shows the F1 of the model and the amount of computation; (<b>c</b>) shows the number of parameters and the F1 of the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The variation of DDAM-Net’s PR, RC, F1, and IOU metrics on different validation datasets with increasing number of trainings, (<b>a</b>) on the HN-CLCD dataset, (<b>b</b>) on the PX-CLCD dataset, and (<b>c</b>) on the SET-CLCD dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Visualization of ablation study on HN-CLCD dataset. (<b>a</b>) Image1. (<b>b</b>) Image2. (<b>c</b>) Label. (<b>d</b>) Model-a. (<b>e</b>) Model-b. (<b>f</b>) Model-c. (<b>g</b>) Model-d. (<b>h</b>) Model-e. (<b>i</b>) represents a localized zoomed-in view of the box. Green means correct detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Red means missing detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Yellow means false detection, denoted by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 9642 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Deep Learning Network for the Extraction of Cropland Based on Landsat Data
by Huiling Chen, Guojin He, Xueli Peng, Guizhou Wang and Ranyu Yin
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4071; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214071 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 692
Abstract
In the face of global population growth and climate change, the protection and rational utilization of cropland are crucial for food security and ecological balance. However, the complex topography and unique ecological environment of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau results in a lack of high-precision [...] Read more.
In the face of global population growth and climate change, the protection and rational utilization of cropland are crucial for food security and ecological balance. However, the complex topography and unique ecological environment of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau results in a lack of high-precision cropland monitoring data. Therefore, this paper constructs a high-quality cropland dataset for the YarlungZangbo-Lhasa-Nyangqv River region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and proposes an MSC-ResUNet model for cropland extraction based on Landsat data. The dataset is annotated at the pixel level, comprising 61 Landsat 8 images in 2023. The MSC-ResUNet model innovatively combines multiscale features through residual connections and multiscale skip connections, effectively capturing features ranging from low-level spatial details to high-level semantic information and further enhances performance by incorporating depthwise separable convolutions as part of the feature fusion process. Experimental results indicate that MSC-ResUNet achieves superior accuracy compared to other models, with F1 scores of 0.826 and 0.856, and MCC values of 0.816 and 0.847, in regional robustness and temporal transferability tests, respectively. Performance analysis across different months and band combinations demonstrates that the model maintains high recognition accuracy during both growing and non-growing seasons, despite the study area’s complex landforms and diverse crops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The workflow of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the study area. (<b>A</b>) shows the schematic representation of the location of the YarlungZangbo-Lhasa-Nyangqv River region within the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. (<b>B</b>) displays the distribution of cropland in the YarlungZangbo-Lhasa-Nyangqv River region in 2023, with cropland indicated in black. (<b>C</b>) illustrates the distribution of Landsat scenes, with numbers representing path and row for Landsat 8 scenes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) represent Gaofen-1 imagery from 2 September 2023 and Gaofen-6 imagery from 17 May 2020, respectively. (<b>A1</b>–<b>A3</b>) show true-color Landsat 8 images from 15 April, 2 June and 6 September 2023, respectively. Similarly, (<b>B1</b>–<b>B3</b>) depict true-color Landsat 8 images from 12 March, 19 August and 4 September 2020. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) illustrate the corresponding cropland label samples, with the cropland areas highlighted in yellow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The distribution map of validation samples in the study area. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent true-color cropland images with a 2-m resolution from Gaofen-1, captured on 14 May, 7 June, 14 September and 27 September 2023. Yellow points indicate cropland validation points derived from manual interpretation, while blue points represent non-cropland validation points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The overall structure of the MSC-ResUNet. (<b>a</b>) shows the overall architecture of the model, including the depth of each layer in the encoder and decoder, with depth information labeled below each circular node; (<b>b</b>) illustrates the residual connection structure in the encoder part; (<b>c</b>) using <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>X</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> explains the specific application of multi-scale skip connections and residual connections in the decoder layers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The prediction results of MSC-ResUNet for images from 25 January 2023, 2 June 2023, 12 March 2020, and 19 August 2020, along with the enlarged views of the corresponding regions indicated by blue boxes I–IV. Yellow pixels represent true cropland, black represents non-cropland, and white represents predicted cropland. Red ellipses indicate misidentified patches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Zoom-in of the predicted results: (<b>I</b>–<b>IV</b>) represent the ground truth for 25 January 2023, 2 June 2023, 12 March 2020, and 19 August 2020, respectively. The red squares in (<b>I</b>–<b>IV</b>) indicate the regions for which the prediction results are shown in (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>), showing the prediction results from DeepLabv3+, HRNet, MACU-Net, UNet, ResUNet++, and MSC-RESUNET, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) shows the spatial distribution of cropland in the slope categories of the regional robustness validation dataset. (<b>b</b>) displays the slope information on model performance in different slope ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Performance of MSC-ResUNet with different band combinations across various months.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spectral reflectance time series of cropland in Lazi County and Doilungdêqên Qu. The mean and standard deviation are represented by lines and error bars, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 11903 KiB  
Article
Remote Sensing Mapping and Analysis of Spatiotemporal Patterns of Land Use and Cover Change in the Helong Region of the Loess Plateau Region (1986–2020)
by Jingyu Li, Yangbo Chen, Yu Gu, Meiying Wang and Yanjun Zhao
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3738; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193738 - 8 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 986
Abstract
Land use and cover change (LUCC) is directly linked to the sustainability of ecosystems and the long-term well-being of human society. The Helong Region in the Loess Plateau has become one of the areas most severely affected by soil and water erosion in [...] Read more.
Land use and cover change (LUCC) is directly linked to the sustainability of ecosystems and the long-term well-being of human society. The Helong Region in the Loess Plateau has become one of the areas most severely affected by soil and water erosion in China due to its unique geographical location and ecological environment. The long-term construction of terraces and orchards is one of the important measures for this region to combat soil erosion. Despite the important role that terraces and orchards play in this region, current studies on their extraction and understanding remain limited. For this reason, this study designed a land use classification system, including terraces and orchards, to reveal the patterns of LUCC and the effectiveness of ecological restoration projects in the area. Based on this system, this study utilized the Random Forest classification algorithm to create an annual land use and cover (LUC) dataset for the Helong Region that covers eight periods from 1986 to 2020, with a spatial resolution of 30 m. The validation results showed that the maps achieved an average overall accuracy of 87.54% and an average Kappa coefficient of 76.94%. This demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed design and land coverage mapping method in the study area. This study found that, from 1986 to 2020, there was a continuous increase in forest and grassland areas, a significant reduction in cropland and bare land areas, and a notable rise in impervious surface areas. We emphasized that the continuous growth of terraces and orchards was an important LUCC trend in the region. This growth was primarily attributed to the conversion of grasslands, croplands, and forests. This transformation not only reduced soil erosion but also enhanced economic efficiency. The products and insights provided in this study help us better understand the complexities of ecological recovery and land management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of Helong Region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Number of Landsat scenes used in the GEE image synthesis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Anomaly screening and repair of Landsat data (<b>a</b>) filling missing data (<b>b</b>) repairing Landsat 7 image gaps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of the training sample polygons at different times and in different categories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Validation of the spatial distribution of the sample set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Temporal distribution of area changes for various LUC types in the Helong Region (the proportion of change on the right axis is relative to the area change ratio with respect to the base year (1986)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of LUC change rates in the Helong Region. (Through linear regression, we calculated the area ratio change rates for each category within each grid (0.1°) from 1986 to 2020, and the spatial distributions of the area ratio changes that were found to be significant (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) are displayed. In the figure, gray grids represent results with insignificant changes or changes below 0.1% per year (−0.1 to 0.1)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial and temporal distributions of forests, grasslands, and croplands transformed into terraces and orchards.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Heat map of the transitions of LUC types in two adjacent periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of the accuracy of HL-LUC, FROM-GLC, CLC-FCS30, and ESA CCI-LC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of HL-LUC-2015 with the three other datasets.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 5983 KiB  
Article
Quality Evaluation of Multi-Source Cropland Data in Alpine Agricultural Areas of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
by Shenghui Lv, Xingsheng Xia, Qiong Chen and Yaozhong Pan
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3611; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193611 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 485
Abstract
Accurate cropland distribution data are essential for efficiently planning production layouts, optimizing farmland use, and improving crop planting efficiency and yield. Although reliable cropland data are crucial for supporting modern regional agricultural monitoring and management, cropland data extracted directly from existing global land [...] Read more.
Accurate cropland distribution data are essential for efficiently planning production layouts, optimizing farmland use, and improving crop planting efficiency and yield. Although reliable cropland data are crucial for supporting modern regional agricultural monitoring and management, cropland data extracted directly from existing global land use/cover products present uncertainties in local regions. This study evaluated the area consistency, spatial pattern overlap, and positional accuracy of cropland distribution data from six high-resolution land use/cover products from approximately 2020 in the alpine agricultural regions of the Hehuang Valley and middle basin of the Yarlung Zangbo River (YZR) and its tributaries (Lhasa and Nianchu Rivers) area on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The results indicated that (1) in terms of area consistency analysis, European Space Agency (ESA) WorldCover cropland distribution data exhibited the best performance among the 10 m resolution products, while GlobeLand30 cropland distribution data performed the best among the 30 m resolution products, despite a significant overestimation of the cropland area. (2) In terms of spatial pattern overlap analysis, AI Earth 10-Meter Land Cover Classification Dataset (AIEC) cropland distribution data performed the best among the 10 m resolution products, followed closely by ESA WorldCover, while the China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) performed the best for the Hehuang Valley and GlobeLand30 performed the best for the YZR area among the 30 m resolution products. (3) In terms of positional accuracy analysis, the ESA WorldCover cropland distribution data performed the best among the 10 m resolution products, while GlobeLand30 data performed the best among the 30 m resolution products. Considering the area consistency, spatial pattern overlap, and positional accuracy, GlobeLand30 and ESA WorldCover cropland distribution data performed best at 30 m and 10 m resolutions, respectively. These findings provide a valuable reference for selecting cropland products and can promote refined cropland mapping of the Hehuang Valley and YZR area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area: (<b>a</b>) study area location, (<b>b</b>) YZR area, and (<b>c</b>) Hehuang Valley. Note: elevation and slope may also vary on Earth due to its geological activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Verification sample points: (<b>a</b>) sample points in the Hehuang Valley and (<b>b</b>) sample points in the YZR area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustration of the relative area difference (%) between the cropland distribution data products and statistical data in the Hehuang Valley. Note that the overestimation proportions exceeding 100% were truncated at 100% to maintain the balance of the color bar. The issue of severe overestimation was common in GL and GLC. (<b>a</b>) WC (10 m), (<b>b</b>) LC (10 m), (<b>c</b>) AIEC (10 m), (<b>d</b>) GL (30 m), (<b>e</b>) GLC (30 m), and (<b>f</b>) CLCD (30 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of the relative area difference (%) between the cropland distribution data products and statistical data in the YZR area. (<b>a</b>) WC (10 m), (<b>b</b>) LC (10 m), (<b>c</b>) AIEC (10 m), (<b>d</b>) GL (30 m), (<b>e</b>) GLC (30 m), and (<b>f</b>) CLCD (30 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial consistency among overlay results: (<b>a</b>) 10 m cropland distribution data in the Hehuang Valley area, (<b>b</b>) 10 m cropland distribution data in the YZR area, (<b>c</b>) 30 m cropland distribution data in the Hehuang Valley area, and (<b>d</b>) 30 m cropland distribution data in the YZR area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Details of cultivated land data in the Hehuang Valley. (<b>a</b>) Slope cropland, (<b>b</b>) areas with concentrated cropland distribution, (<b>c</b>) urban green spaces, and (<b>d</b>) areas with a mixture of cropland and other land types. WC (10 m), LC (10 m), AIEC (10 m), GL (30 m), GLC (30 m), and CLCD (30 m). Note: The process of manual visual interpretation primarily relies on sub-meter resolution remote sensing imagery, supplemented by auxiliary data, such as DEM data, ground survey samples, and other cropland distribution data. In this context, the primary focus is on the misclassification of cropland. Therefore, forest, grassland, and urban green spaces were categorized as a single class, while built-up areas and bare areas were grouped into another class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Details of cultivated land data in the YZR area. (<b>a1</b>,<b>a2</b>) WC (10 m), (<b>b1</b>,<b>b2</b>) LC (10 m), (<b>c1</b>,<b>c2</b>) AIEC (10 m), (<b>d1</b>,<b>d2</b>) GL (30 m), (<b>e1</b>,<b>e2</b>) GLC (30 m), and (<b>f1</b>,<b>f2</b>) CLCD (30 m). Note: The process of manual visual interpretation primarily relies on sub-meter resolution remote sensing imagery, supplemented by auxiliary data, such as DEM data, ground survey samples, and other cropland distribution data. In this case, the focus is on the omission of cultivated land. Consequently, only the cropland category was interpreted.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Pixel distribution of cropland distribution data in the Hehuang Valley. (<b>a</b>) WC (10 m), (<b>b</b>) LC (10 m), (<b>c</b>) AIEC (10 m), (<b>d</b>) GL (30 m), (<b>e</b>) GLC (30 m), and (<b>f</b>) CLCD (30 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Pixel distribution of cropland distribution data in the YZR area. (<b>a</b>) WC (10 m), (<b>b</b>) LC (10 m), (<b>c</b>) AIEC (10 m), (<b>d</b>) GL (30 m), (<b>e</b>) GLC (30 m), and (<b>f</b>) CLCD (30 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Area proportion of pixels with different consistencies in different terrain factor ranges in the Hehuang Valley region. (<b>a</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 10 m cropland distribution data products at different slope ranges. (<b>b</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 30 m cropland distribution data products at different slope ranges. (<b>c</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 10 m cropland distribution data products at different elevation ranges. (<b>d</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 30 m cropland distribution data products at different elevation ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Area proportion of pixels with different consistencies among the different terrain factor ranges in the YZR area. (<b>a</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 10 m cropland distribution data products at different slope ranges. (<b>b</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 30 m cropland distribution data products at different slope ranges. (<b>c</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 10 m cropland distribution data products at different elevation ranges. (<b>d</b>) Proportion of consistent pixels among the 30 m cropland distribution data products at different elevation ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Forage fields with cultivated grain at high elevations.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6791 KiB  
Article
Vegetation Phenology Changes and Recovery after an Extreme Rainfall Event: A Case Study in Henan Province, China
by Yinghao Lin, Xiaoyu Guo, Yang Liu, Liming Zhou, Yadi Wang, Qiang Ge and Yuye Wang
Agriculture 2024, 14(9), 1649; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091649 - 20 Sep 2024
Viewed by 617
Abstract
Extreme rainfall can severely affect all vegetation types, significantly impacting crop yield and quality. This study aimed to assess the response and recovery of vegetation phenology to an extreme rainfall event (with total weekly rainfall exceeding 500 mm in several cities) in Henan [...] Read more.
Extreme rainfall can severely affect all vegetation types, significantly impacting crop yield and quality. This study aimed to assess the response and recovery of vegetation phenology to an extreme rainfall event (with total weekly rainfall exceeding 500 mm in several cities) in Henan Province, China, in 2021. The analysis utilized multi-sourced data, including remote sensing reflectance, meteorological, and crop yield data. First, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time series was calculated from reflectance data on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. Next, the ‘phenofit’ R language package was used to extract the phenology parameters—the start of the growing season (SOS) and the end of the growing season (EOS). Finally, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, v.26.0.0.0) software was used for Duncan’s analysis, and Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB, v.R2022b) software was used to analyze the effects of rainfall on land surface phenology (LSP) and crop yield. The results showed the following. (1) The extreme rainfall event’s impact on phenology manifested directly as a delay in EOS in the year of the event. In 2021, the EOS of the second growing season was delayed by 4.97 days for cropland, 15.54 days for forest, 13.06 days for grassland, and 12.49 days for shrubland. (2) Resistance was weak in 2021, but recovery reached in most areas by 2022 and slowed in 2023. (3) In each year, SOS was predominantly negatively correlated with total rainfall in July (64% of cropland area in the first growing season, 53% of grassland area, and 71% of shrubland area). In contrast, the EOS was predominantly positively correlated with rainfall (51% and 54% area of cropland in the first and second growing season, respectively, and 76% of shrubland area); however, crop yields were mainly negatively correlated with rainfall (71% for corn, 60% for beans) and decreased during the year of the event, with negative correlation coefficients between rainfall and yield (−0.02 for corn, −0.25 for beans). This work highlights the sensitivity of crops to extreme rainfall and underscores the need for further research on their long-term recovery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of the study area, Henan Province (China), and the distribution of its land cover types. (<b>b</b>) Cumulative rainfall from 17 July to 23 July 2021. The irregular purple line-demarcated zone is where the cumulative rainfall exceeded 500 mm, with its cities delineated by gray lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flowchart of this vegetation phenology study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Trends in the NDVI of each vegetation type, from 2018 to 2023. Green curves show representative sample point values in the extreme rainfall zone while gray curves show those in non-extreme rainfall zone; the vertically dashed red lines and red rectangles mark the occurrence of the extreme rainfall event in 2021 in Henan Province (China).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of resistance values of vegetation after the extreme rainfall event in 2021, in Henan Province, China. In (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) are the patterns of vegetation recovery in 2022 and 2023, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The patterns of rainfall recovery in (<b>a</b>) 2022 and (<b>b</b>) 2023, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of Pearson’s <span class="html-italic">r</span> coefficient values in cropland: (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) are the correlations of SOS1, EOS1, SOS2, and EOS2 with rainfall, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of Pearson’s <span class="html-italic">r</span> coefficient values for the forest (<b>a</b>) SOS and (<b>b</b>) EOS correlations with rainfall, in Henan Province, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of Pearson’s <span class="html-italic">r</span> coefficient values for the grassland (<b>a</b>) SOS and (<b>b</b>) EOS correlations with rainfall, in Henan Province, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of Pearson’s <span class="html-italic">r</span> coefficient values for the shrubland (<b>a</b>) SOS and (<b>b</b>) EOS correlations with rainfall, in Henan Province, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of Pearson’s <span class="html-italic">r</span> coefficients for the (<b>a</b>) corn yield and (<b>b</b>) bean yield correlations with rainfall, in Henan Province, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The average rainfall per city in July each year from 2018 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8921 KiB  
Article
A Method for Cropland Layer Extraction in Complex Scenes Integrating Edge Features and Semantic Segmentation
by Yihang Lu, Lin Li, Wen Dong, Yizhen Zheng, Xin Zhang, Jinzhong Zhang, Tao Wu and Meiling Liu
Agriculture 2024, 14(9), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091553 - 8 Sep 2024
Viewed by 944
Abstract
Cultivated land is crucial for food production and security. In complex environments like mountainous regions, the fragmented nature of the cultivated land complicates rapid and accurate information acquisition. Deep learning has become essential for extracting cultivated land but faces challenges such as edge [...] Read more.
Cultivated land is crucial for food production and security. In complex environments like mountainous regions, the fragmented nature of the cultivated land complicates rapid and accurate information acquisition. Deep learning has become essential for extracting cultivated land but faces challenges such as edge detail loss and limited adaptability. This study introduces a novel approach that combines geographical zonal stratification with the temporal characteristics of medium-resolution remote sensing images for identifying cultivated land. The methodology involves geographically zoning and stratifying the study area, and then integrating semantic segmentation and edge detection to analyze remote sensing images and generate initial extraction results. These results are refined through post-processing with medium-resolution imagery classification to produce a detailed map of the cultivated land distribution. The method achieved an overall extraction accuracy of 95.07% in Tongnan District, with specific accuracies of 92.49% for flat cultivated land, 96.18% for terraced cultivated land, 93.80% for sloping cultivated land, and 78.83% for forest intercrop land. The results indicate that, compared to traditional methods, this approach is faster and more accurate, reducing both false positives and omissions. This paper presents a new methodological framework for large-scale cropland mapping in complex scenarios, offering valuable insights for subsequent cropland extraction in challenging environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location and topography of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Typical sample diagram: land cover sample points (<b>a</b>), edge detection samples (<b>b</b>,<b>b1</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>c1</b>), semantic segmentation samples (<b>d</b>,<b>d1</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>e1</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of zoning and layering: plain area (<b>A</b>); mountainous area (<b>B</b>); forest–grass area (<b>C</b>); flat cultivated land (<b>a</b>); terraced cultivated land (<b>b1</b>); sloping cultivated land (<b>b2</b>); forest intercrop land (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overall distribution mapping: the distribution characteristics of terraced cultivated land (<b>A</b>), the distribution characteristics of forest intercrop land (<b>B</b>), the distribution characteristics of flat cultivated land (<b>C</b>), and the distribution characteristics of sloping cultivated land (<b>D</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A comparison of the results of the partitioned and layered extraction method with those of the non-partitioned and direct extraction method.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 8588 KiB  
Article
A Novel Approach for Farmland Size Estimation in Small-Scale Agriculture Using Edge Counting and Remote Sensing
by Jingnan Du, Sucheng Xu, Jinshan Li, Jiakun Duan and Wu Xiao
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 2981; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162981 - 14 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 817
Abstract
Accurate and timely information on farmland size is crucial for agricultural development, resource management, and other related fields. However, there is currently no mature method for estimating farmland size in smallholder farming areas. This is due to the small size of farmland plots [...] Read more.
Accurate and timely information on farmland size is crucial for agricultural development, resource management, and other related fields. However, there is currently no mature method for estimating farmland size in smallholder farming areas. This is due to the small size of farmland plots in these areas, which have unclear boundaries in medium and high-resolution satellite imagery, and irregular shapes that make it difficult to extract complete boundaries using morphological rules. Automatic farmland mapping algorithms using remote sensing data also perform poorly in small-scale farming areas. To address this issue, this study proposes a farmland size evaluation index based on edge frequency (ECR). The algorithm utilizes the high temporal resolution of Sentinel-2 satellite imagery to compensate for its spatial resolution limitations. First, all Sentinel-2 images from one year are used to calculate edge frequencies, which can divide farmland areas into low-value farmland interior regions, medium-value non-permanent edges, and high-value permanent edges (PE). Next, the Otsu’s thresholding algorithm is iteratively applied twice to the edge frequencies to first extract edges and then permanent edges. The ratio of PE to cropland (ECR) is then calculated. Using the North China Plain and Northeast China Plain as study areas, and comparing with existing farmland size datasets, the appropriate estimation radius for ECR was determined to be 1600 m. The study found that the peak ECR value for the Northeast China Plain was 0.085, and the peak value for the North China Plain was 0.105. The overall distribution was consistent with the reference dataset. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Remote Sensing for Crop Monitoring and Food Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The red borders outline the six major grain-producing provinces in China, which serve as our study area. From top to bottom, left to right, they are Inner Mongolia and Liaoning Province in the Northeast China Plain, and Shandong Province, Henan Province, Hubei Province, and Anhui Province in the North China Plain. There are a total of 1792 sample points from the Geo-Wiki plot size dataset that fall within the study area. Both color and size are used to display the points based on plot size for better visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical flowchart of this study. Abbreviations: NDVI stands for normalized difference vegetation index; Otsu, Otsu binary segmentation algorithm; ECR, edge cropland ratio [<a href="#B6-remotesensing-16-02981" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The figure illustrates the Edge count generation process within a 3200 m radius of a sample point (Sample ID: 962700, Latitude: 45.417702, Longitude: 121.545998) located in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Edge count represents the number of times each pixel is marked as an edge. In the grayscale image, brighter areas indicate higher counts, while pure black areas represent non-farmland regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) shows the buffer zones of different radii for the sample point, ranging from 200 m to 3200 m. (<b>b</b>) displays the edge count images obtained at different radii. The edge count result for the 3200 m radius is shown in (<b>c</b>), with non-farmland areas set as transparent. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), respectively, represent the extracted edges, permanent edges, and edge frequency distribution of (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The boxplot illustrates the distribution of estimated ECR values at different radii. The numerical statistics are shown in the right figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The distribution of ECR for each parcel size group is shown in separate figures with different radii.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The line chart on the left shows the probability density distribution of ECRs at different radii, while the bar chart on the right shows the number of Field size labels at each level, categorized by province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The figure presents three samples of different farmland sizes in separate columns, from left to right: XL, M, and XS. The three rows from top to bottom are: Google Satellite basemap and sample’s metadata, edge count image and grayscale histogram (upper right corner), and identified permanent edges (in red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The probability density curves of the 1600 m ECRs are displayed, grouped by parcel size. The three vertical dashed lines in the left figure represent the optimal thresholds for classifying farmland size based on ECRs, determined using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The confusion matrix on the right shows the comparison between our ECR-predicted farmland sizes and the manually interpreted labeling results.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 5461 KiB  
Essay
BAFormer: A Novel Boundary-Aware Compensation UNet-like Transformer for High-Resolution Cropland Extraction
by Zhiyong Li, Youming Wang, Fa Tian, Junbo Zhang, Yijie Chen and Kunhong Li
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2526; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142526 - 10 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1384
Abstract
Utilizing deep learning for semantic segmentation of cropland from remote sensing imagery has become a crucial technique in land surveys. Cropland is highly heterogeneous and fragmented, and existing methods often suffer from inaccurate boundary segmentation. This paper introduces a UNet-like boundary-aware compensation model [...] Read more.
Utilizing deep learning for semantic segmentation of cropland from remote sensing imagery has become a crucial technique in land surveys. Cropland is highly heterogeneous and fragmented, and existing methods often suffer from inaccurate boundary segmentation. This paper introduces a UNet-like boundary-aware compensation model (BAFormer). Cropland boundaries typically exhibit rapid transformations in pixel values and texture features, often appearing as high-frequency features in remote sensing images. To enhance the recognition of these high-frequency features as represented by cropland boundaries, the proposed BAFormer integrates a Feature Adaptive Mixer (FAM) and develops a Depthwise Large Kernel Multi-Layer Perceptron model (DWLK-MLP) to enrich the global and local cropland boundaries features separately. Specifically, FAM enhances the boundary-aware method by adaptively acquiring high-frequency features through convolution and self-attention advantages, while DWLK-MLP further supplements boundary position information using a large receptive field. The efficacy of BAFormer has been evaluated on datasets including Vaihingen, Potsdam, LoveDA, and Mapcup. It demonstrates high performance, achieving mIoU scores of 84.5%, 87.3%, 53.5%, and 83.1% on these datasets, respectively. Notably, BAFormer-T (lightweight model) surpasses other lightweight models on the Vaihingen dataset with scores of 91.3% F1 and 84.1% mIoU. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Inaccurate edge issues. (<b>b</b>) Feature recognition error problems. Illustrates the differences between Ground Truth (GT) and model Predictions (Pre) obtained from the Vaihingen and Potsdam datasets, using prediction maps generated by UNetFormer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An overview of the BAFormer model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The structure of BABlock. (<b>a</b>) represents the block structure in Swin-Transformer, and (<b>b</b>) represents the BABlock structure in BAFormer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The structure of the Feature Adaptive Mixer (FAM) is as follows: 2D refers to a two-dimensional image, and 1D denotes a sequence stretched to one dimension. BN stands for Batch Normalization. High-Attn represents the attention weight score attributed to high-frequency features in the mixed information flow, while Low-Attn represents the attention weight score attributed to low-frequency features in the mixed information flow. Both dimensions are denoted as HxW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of the Relational Adaptive Fusion (RAF) module. GAP stands for Global Average Pooling and MLP stands for Multi-Layer Perceptron variation. Blue and orange represent the feature maps of the shallow and deep layers of the network, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plain MLP that processes only cross-channel information. (<b>b</b>) Depthwise residuals for aggregating local tokens, DW-MLP. (<b>c</b>) Depthwise residuals for aggregating multi-scale tokens, MS-MLP. (<b>d</b>) Our proposed depthwise large kernel, DWLK-MLP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Qualitative comparisons under ISPRS Vaihaigen (<b>top</b>) and ISPRS Postdam (<b>bottom</b>) test sets. We add some black dotted boxes to highlight the differences to facilitate model comparisons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Qualitative comparisons with different methods on the LoveDA validation set. We add some dotted boxes to highlight the differences to facilitate model comparisons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Qualitative comparisons with different methods on the Mapcup test set. We add some white dotted boxes to highlight the differences to facilitate model comparisons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Visual comparisons of boundary extracted by different methods on the Mapcup test set will be conducted, and the resulting edges will be utilized for calculating Boundary IoU.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Inference visualization was performed in a randomly selected region in the north. Red represents cropland and black represents non-cropland. (<b>a</b>) High-resolution remote sensing large image. (<b>b</b>) Visualization of model inference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Ablation study on the number of model multi-heads and window size on the Vaihingen dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Feature Adaptive Mixer (FAM) feature map visualization.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 27708 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Variations of Vegetation and Its Response to Climate Change and Human Activities in Arid Areas—A Case Study of the Shule River Basin, Northwestern China
by Xiaorui He, Luqing Zhang, Yuehan Lu and Linghuan Chai
Forests 2024, 15(7), 1147; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071147 - 1 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1290
Abstract
The Shule River Basin (SRB) is a typical arid area in northwest China with a fragile ecology. Understanding vegetation dynamics and its response to climate change and human activities provides essential ecological and environmental resource management information. This study extracted fractional vegetation coverage [...] Read more.
The Shule River Basin (SRB) is a typical arid area in northwest China with a fragile ecology. Understanding vegetation dynamics and its response to climate change and human activities provides essential ecological and environmental resource management information. This study extracted fractional vegetation coverage (FVC) data from 2000 to 2019 using the Google Earth Engine platform and Landsat satellite images, employing trend analysis and other methods to examine spatiotemporal changes in vegetation in the SRB. Additionally, we used partial correlation and residual analyses to explore the response of FVC to climate change and human activities. The main results were: (1) The regional average FVC in the SRB showed a significant upward trend from 2000 to 2019, increasing by 1.3 × 10−3 a–1. The area within 1 km of roads experienced a higher increase of 3 × 10−3 a–1, while the roadless areas experienced a lower increase of 1.1 × 10−3 a–1. The FVC spatial heterogeneity in the SRB is significant. (2) Partial correlation analysis shows that the FVC correlates positively with precipitation and surface water area, with correlation coefficients of 0.575 and 0.744, respectively. A weak negative correlation exists between the FVC and land surface temperature (LST). FVC changes are more influenced by precipitation than by LST. (3) The contributions of climate change to vegetation recovery are increasing. Human activities, particularly agricultural practices, infrastructure development, and the conversion of farmland to grassland, significantly influence vegetation changes in densely populated areas. (4) The area changes of different land types are closely related to climate factors and human activities. Increased construction, agricultural activity, and converting farmland back to grassland have led to an increase in the area proportions of “impervious surfaces”, “cropland”, and “grassland”. Climate changes, such as increased rainfall, have resulted in larger areas of “wetlands” and “sparse vegetation”. These results provide valuable information for ecosystem restoration and environmental protection in the SRB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Remote Sensing in Vegetation Dynamic and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area. (<b>a</b>) The geographic location and terrain of the Shule River Basin, and (<b>b</b>) the land cover types of the Shule River Basin, including cropland, grassland, sparse vegetation, wetlands, impervious surfaces, and bare areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Framework of this research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The temporal changes of vegetation coverage from 2000 to 2019 in SRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dynamic changes of vegetation cover in “road areas” (V<sub>Climate+Human</sub>), “roadless areas” (V<sub>Climate</sub>), and the entire region (V<sub>All</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Vegetation changes caused by road construction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of FVC and the significance of variations in FVC in the SRB in (<b>a</b>) 2000–2004, (<b>b</b>) 2005–2009, (<b>c</b>) 2010–2014, and (<b>d</b>) 2015–2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The relationship between precipitation and FVC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The relationship between LST and FVC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The relationship between the FVC and the area of surface water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Partial correlation coefficient between FVC and climate. (<b>a</b>) FVC and precipitation (Pre) partial correlation. (<b>b</b>) FVC and LST partial correlation. (<b>c</b>) The relationship between FVC and precipitation. Significant negative correlation (SNC), significant positive correlation (SPC), and non-significant correlation (NSC). (<b>d</b>) The relationship between FVC and LST.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Contribution of climate change and human activities to annual variation in FVC from 2000 to 2019 in the SRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The area proportions of different land cover types from 2000 to 2019 in the SRB.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8387 KiB  
Article
Quantifying Dissolved Organic Carbon Efflux from Drained Peatlands in Hemiboreal Latvia
by Raitis Normunds Meļņiks, Emīls Mārtiņš Upenieks, Aldis Butlers, Arta Bārdule, Santa Kalēja and Andis Lazdiņš
Land 2024, 13(6), 790; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060790 - 3 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1270
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of different land use types on groundwater dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and annual DOC efflux from drained peatlands to catchment runoff, providing insights into the mechanisms of carbon stock changes in peatland soils. We measured groundwater chemical [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the impact of different land use types on groundwater dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and annual DOC efflux from drained peatlands to catchment runoff, providing insights into the mechanisms of carbon stock changes in peatland soils. We measured groundwater chemical properties and various environmental variables, and calculated daily runoff and evapotranspiration for 2021 to estimate monthly and annual DOC efflux and analyzed main affecting factors in different peatland land use types. The highest DOC concentrations in groundwater were found in Scots pine forests and active peat extraction sites, with values of 113.7 mg L−1 and 109.7 mg L−1, respectively, and the lowest in silver birch forests and croplands, at 51.9 mg L−1 and 18.6 mg L−1, respectively. There were statistically significant correlations, including a strong negative correlation between DOC concentrations and several groundwater chemical properties, such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), Ca, Mg, and K concentrations. The concentrations of DOC in the groundwater of drained peatland showed significant variation between different land use types. The highest annual DOC efflux was observed in active peat extraction sites, at 513.1 kg ha−1 y−1, while the lowest was in grasslands, at 61.9 kg ha−1 y−1, where Ca and Mg concentrations, as well as EC, were the highest. Continuous monitoring of these concentration patterns is essential. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location and land use type of the research sites in Latvia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Variation in monthly mean DOC concentration in groundwater by land use type (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 24 for each land use type). Rectangles fall within the first to third quartile range. The intercepts fall within the zeroth to fourth quartile range. The rectangles are divided by the median. “x” represents the arithmetic mean value. Abandoned means abandoned peat extraction site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mean monthly DOC concentrations in groundwater in different land use types. Abandoned means abandoned peat extraction site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Monthly mean precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, actual evapotranspiration, and runoff rates in all research sites (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 2190).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monthly potential evapotranspiration (<b>left</b>) and runoff (<b>right</b>) rates in all research sites. Abandoned means abandoned peat extraction site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mean monthly DOC efflux by land use type, each represented with 24 measurements (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 168). The rectangles are located within the first to third quartile range. The intercepts range from the zeroth to fourth quartile. Dots represent extremes. The rectangles are divided by the median. “x” represents the arithmetic mean value. Abandoned means abandoned peat extraction site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Estimated annual DOC efflux from each land use type, each represented by 24 concentration measurements and runoff estimates (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 168). Whiskers indicate S.E. Abandoned means abandoned peat extraction site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Correlation matrix for each land use type group. All sites (<b>A</b>) consist of all research sites, Peatland forests (<b>B</b>) consist of Scots pine forests and silver birch forests; peat extraction sites (<b>C</b>) consist of active peat extraction sites and abandoned peat extraction sites with and without vegetation; and agricultural lands (<b>D</b>) consist of croplands and grasslands. Red indicates negative correlation; blue indicates positive correlation; blank indicates insignificant correlation (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Most significant individual regressions between monthly mean DOC concentrations and different parameters of groundwater chemical composition in different types of land use. All sites (<b>A</b>) consist of all research sites, Peatland forests (<b>B</b>) consist of Scots pine forests and silver birch forests; peat extraction sites (<b>C</b>) consist of active peat extraction sites and abandoned peat extraction sites with and without vegetation; agricultural lands (<b>D</b>) consist of croplands and grasslands. Abandoned means abandoned peat extraction site.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 9885 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Temporal Analysis on the Dynamics of the Impact of Land Use and Land Cover on NO2 and CO Emissions in Argentina for Sustainable Environmental Management
by Viviana Fernández-Maldonado, Ana Laura Navas, María Paula Fabani, Germán Mazza and Rosa Rodríguez
Sustainability 2024, 16(11), 4400; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114400 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1073
Abstract
This study presents an analysis of NO2 and CO emissions in Argentina, utilizing remote sensing data. This research aims to determine the spatiotemporal distribution of NO2 and CO emissions from 2019 to 2021. It examines the influence of land use and [...] Read more.
This study presents an analysis of NO2 and CO emissions in Argentina, utilizing remote sensing data. This research aims to determine the spatiotemporal distribution of NO2 and CO emissions from 2019 to 2021. It examines the influence of land use and cover on NO2 and CO emissions using various climatic, anthropic, and natural indicators. The year with the highest CO and NO2 concentration was 2020. NO2 exhibited the highest concentrations in built-up urban areas and croplands, notably impacting the capital city and the northern region of Buenos Aires province. Also, CO concentration was influenced by anthropic variable distances to national route, mining extraction, power plants, airports, and urban index (UI). They were also influenced by climatic and natural variables (Palmer drought index, vapor pressure, maximum environment temperature, wind speed, DEM, humidity, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)) for the different uses and land covers. NO2 concentrations were influenced by anthropic (distance to airports, service stations, open dumpsites, power plants, and factories), climatic, and natural variables (Palmer drought index, vapor pressure, wind speed, and DEM) for the different uses and land cover. This research supports sustainable environmental management by guiding the development of effective emission mitigation strategies for improved community health and well-being. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Land Use and Management, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area. The Argentine Republic, with an elevation model and most traveled routes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Annual maps of CO distribution (mol m<sup>−2</sup>) for Argentina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Annual maps of NO<sub>2</sub> distribution (mmol m<sup>−2</sup>) for Argentina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Generalized linear model (global model) explaining the variation in NO<sub>2</sub> concentration depending on the interaction between polygon area (ha) and LULC.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Map showing the different LULCs and the sampling points for each coverage.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>The following figure describes the script detailing the formula used in gamma models in the R program.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Fitting the GLM with gamma distribution for tree cover/herbaceous wetland for both gases (<b>a</b>) CO and (<b>b</b>) NO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Fitting the GLM with gamma distribution for shrubland/grassland coverage for both gases (<b>a</b>) CO and (<b>b</b>) NO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Fitting the GLM with gamma distribution for cropland/built-up coverage for both gases (<b>a</b>) CO and (<b>b</b>) NO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Fitting the GLM with gamma distribution for bare/sparse vegetation coverage for both gases (<b>a</b>) CO and (<b>b</b>) NO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop