[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = conect4children

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 2411 KiB  
Article
Learning from conect4children: A Collaborative Approach towards Standardisation of Disease-Specific Paediatric Research Data
by Anando Sen, Victoria Hedley, Eva Degraeuwe, Steven Hirschfeld, Ronald Cornet, Ramona Walls, John Owen, Peter N. Robinson, Edward G. Neilan, Thomas Liener, Giovanni Nisato, Neena Modi, Simon Woodworth, Avril Palmeri, Ricarda Gaentzsch, Melissa Walsh, Teresa Berkery, Joanne Lee, Laura Persijn, Kasey Baker, Kristina An Haack, Sonia Segovia Simon, Julius O. B. Jacobsen, Giorgio Reggiardo, Melissa A. Kirwin, Jessie Trueman, Claudia Pansieri, Donato Bonifazi, Sinéad Nally, Fedele Bonifazi, Rebecca Leary and Volker Straubadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Data 2024, 9(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/data9040055 - 8 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2866
Abstract
The conect4children (c4c) initiative was established to facilitate the development of new drugs and other therapies for paediatric patients. It is widely recognised that there are not enough medicines tested for all relevant ages of the paediatric population. To overcome this, it is [...] Read more.
The conect4children (c4c) initiative was established to facilitate the development of new drugs and other therapies for paediatric patients. It is widely recognised that there are not enough medicines tested for all relevant ages of the paediatric population. To overcome this, it is imperative that clinical data from different sources are interoperable and can be pooled for larger post hoc studies. c4c has collaborated with the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) to develop cross-cutting data resources that build on existing CDISC standards in an effort to standardise paediatric data. The natural next step was an extension to disease-specific data items. c4c brought together several existing initiatives and resources relevant to disease-specific data and analysed their use for standardising disease-specific data in clinical trials. Several case studies that combined disease-specific data from multiple trials have demonstrated the need for disease-specific data standardisation. We identified three relevant initiatives. These include European Reference Networks, European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases, and Pistoia Alliance. Other resources reviewed were National Cancer Institute Enterprise Vocabulary Services, CDISC standards, pharmaceutical company-specific data dictionaries, Human Phenotype Ontology, Phenopackets, Unified Registry for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Orphacodes, Rare Disease Cures Accelerator-Data and Analytics Platform (RDCA-DAP), and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership. The collaborative partners associated with these resources were also reviewed briefly. A plan of action focussed on collaboration was generated for standardising disease-specific paediatric clinical trial data. A paediatric data standards multistakeholder and multi-project user group was established to guide the remaining actions—FAIRification of metadata, a Phenopackets pilot with RDCA-DAP, applying Orphacodes to case report forms of clinical trials, introducing CDISC standards into European Reference Networks, testing of the CDISC Pediatric User Guide using data from the mentioned resources and organisation of further workshops and educational materials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The categorisations for the 13 initiatives and resources brought together by c4c for disease-specific standardisation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Exemplar relationships between select terminologies, data standards, and resources. The spheres of activity are designated by coloured boxes where yellow is research, grey is meta thesauri and mappings, light orange is regulatory activities, green is healthcare delivery (slightly darker for a sub-box of observations), and blue is reimbursement. The mappings are simplified and do not indicate the many levels of interactivity and potential interoperability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of the ongoing and proposed collaborations between large consortia, data resources and data standards and dictionaries. Ongoing collaborations are marked with black double-headed arrows. Single-headed blue arrows denote a smaller resource as part of a larger resource, which are together encapsulated in a box. The box labelled ‘Pharmaceutical companies’ stands for both industry data dictionaries as well as industries as a collective entity that conducts clinical trials. Red dashed arrows denote the collaborations proposed in the action points with the action number over the arrows. Action points 1 and 7 are shown as a red dashed box around the figure.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2122 KiB  
Article
How Can a Clinical Data Modelling Tool Be Used to Represent Data Items of Relevance to Paediatric Clinical Trials? Learning from the Conect4children (c4c) Consortium
by Chima Amadi, Rebecca Leary, Avril Palmeri, Victoria Hedley, Anando Sen, Rahil Qamar Siddiqui, Dipak Kalra and Volker Straub
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 1604; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031604 - 2 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2782
Abstract
Data dictionaries for clinical trials are often created manually, with data structures and controlled vocabularies specific for a trial or family of trials within a sponsor’s portfolio. Microsoft Excel is commonly used to capture the representation of data dictionary items but has limited [...] Read more.
Data dictionaries for clinical trials are often created manually, with data structures and controlled vocabularies specific for a trial or family of trials within a sponsor’s portfolio. Microsoft Excel is commonly used to capture the representation of data dictionary items but has limited functionality for this purpose. The conect4children (c4c) network is piloting the Direcht clinical data modelling tool to model their Cross Cutting Paediatric Data Dictionary (CCPDD) in a more formalised way. The first pilot had the key objective of testing whether a clinical data modelling tool could be used to represent data items from the CCPDD. The key objective of the second pilot is to establish whether a small team with little or no experience of clinical data modelling can use Direcht to expand the CCPDD. Clinical modelling is the process of structuring clinical data so it can be understood by computer systems and humans. The model contains all of the elements that are needed to define the data item. Results from the pilots show that Direcht creates a structured environment to build data items into models that fit into the larger CCPDD. Models can be represented as an HTML document, mind map, or exported in various formats for import into a computer system. Challenges identified over the course of both pilots are being addressed with c4c partners and external stakeholders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semantic Interoperability and Applications in Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram showing the flow chart of the use of Direcht to model data dictionary items. HTML—hypertext markup language; ODM—operational data model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Microsoft Excel worksheet showing the c4c data dictionary item for BodyMeasurement. CDASH—Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonisation; SDTM—Study Data Tabulation Model; CDISC—Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; CDASHIG—Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonisation Implementation Guide; SDTMIG—Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Image showing the ‘Create Entry’ screen in Direcht.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Image showing the ‘Element’ section in an ‘Entry’ page in Direcht.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of modelling pubertal status concepts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Image showing the CDISC mapping uniform resource locator (URL) and description. CDISC—Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Image of the HTML version of the modelled data dictionary. SDTM—Study Data Tabulation Model; FHIR—Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources; CDASH—Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonisation; HTML—hypertext markup language.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Image of the mind map of a modelled data dictionary. EN—entry; CL—cluster; EL—element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of the role of a modelling tool in a clinical trial environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Modelled data dictionary item of oxygen saturation.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop