[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Yutu-2 rover images

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 22731 KiB  
Article
Study on the Degradation Pattern of Impact Crater Populations in Yutu-2′s Rovering Area
by Xinyu Ma, Meixi Chen, Teng Hu, Zhizhong Kang and Meng Xiao
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(13), 2356; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132356 - 27 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 816
Abstract
A detailed analysis of the panoramic camera data from the 27th to 33rd lunar days was conducted on the high-resolution scenes captured by the Yutu-2 rover stations. This analysis aimed to determine the detailed morphological parameters of the 2015 impact craters within the [...] Read more.
A detailed analysis of the panoramic camera data from the 27th to 33rd lunar days was conducted on the high-resolution scenes captured by the Yutu-2 rover stations. This analysis aimed to determine the detailed morphological parameters of the 2015 impact craters within the inspection area. The levels of degradation observed in the impact craters were determined alongside the surface features. Subsequently, the degradation patterns of the impact craters located within the Yutu-2’s roving area and the distribution patterns of the morphological parameters were analysed and investigated. The results of the analysis indicate that 94% of the impact craters exhibited severe degradation, 80% had depth-to-diameter ratios (DDRs) ranging from 0.07 to 0.17, and the remaining craters were moderately degraded. The DDRs of the impact craters exhibited a declining trend with an increase in the dimensions of the impact craters. Additionally, the degree of degradation of impact crater populations demonstrated a decreasing trend. In general, the impact craters along the rover’s route exhibited severe degradation, with the population of degradation degrees gradually decreasing with increasing diameter. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planetary Geologic Mapping and Remote Sensing (Second Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Parts of an original panoramic camera image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Step diagram of data processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Impact crater identification method. (<b>a</b>) Impact crater marking with DOM as base map. (<b>b</b>) Contour-assisted recognition with DOM as base map. (<b>c</b>) Visual comparison of the original images of the rover. The red circle in the figure shows the approximate location of the impact crater, and the yellow line shows the contour lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Impact crater identification method. (<b>a</b>) Impact crater marking with DOM as base map. (<b>b</b>) Contour-assisted recognition with DOM as base map. (<b>c</b>) Visual comparison of the original images of the rover. The red circle in the figure shows the approximate location of the impact crater, and the yellow line shows the contour lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Examples of different types of impact crater degradation. The diagram shows the degradation levels of the impact crater. The levels are marked in the lower left corner.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Generated images: (<b>a</b>) D0M image; (<b>b</b>) DEM image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic of DOM image range.The red ring in the figure represents the effective range of the image, and the meanings represented by the other colours are marked in the figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of impact craters in DOM images. The yellow circles represent the approximate locations of all extractable impact craters at the station in the diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Size–frequency distribution of the impact craters up to 2 m in diameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Depth–diameter relationship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Frequency plot of depth-to-diameter ratios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Diameter–depth ratio relationship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Degradation level classifications as percentages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Diameter–degradation level relationship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Relationship between depth-to-diameter ratio and degradation classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Results of the existing study. (<b>a</b>) shows a plot of diameter versus depth, and (<b>b</b>) shows a plot of diameter versus depth-to-diameter ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Craterstats2 programme-calculated equilibrium lines [<a href="#B26-remotesensing-16-02356" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B28-remotesensing-16-02356" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 24071 KiB  
Article
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Geometric Morphology Analysis of Lunar Small Craters within the Patrol Range of the Yutu-2 Rover
by Xinchao Xu, Xiaotian Fu, Hanguang Zhao, Mingyue Liu, Aigong Xu and Youqing Ma
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(17), 4251; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174251 - 30 Aug 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 1756
Abstract
Craters on the lunar surface are the most direct method for the study of geological processes and are of great significance to the study of lunar evolution. In order to fill the research gap on small craters (diameter less than 3 m), we [...] Read more.
Craters on the lunar surface are the most direct method for the study of geological processes and are of great significance to the study of lunar evolution. In order to fill the research gap on small craters (diameter less than 3 m), we focus on the small craters around the moving path of the Yutu-2 lunar rover and carry out a 3D reconstruction and geometrical morphology analysis on them. First, a self-calibration model with multiple feature constraints is used to calibrate the navigation camera and obtain the internal and external parameters. Then, the sequence images with overlapping regions from neighboring stations are used to obtain the precise position of the rover through the bundle adjustment (BA) method. After that, a cross-scale cost aggregation for a stereo matching network is proposed to obtain a parallax map, which can further obtain 3D point clouds of the lunar surface. Finally, the indexes of the craters are extracted (diameter D, depth d, and depth–diameter ratio dr), and the different indicators are fitted and analyzed. The results suggest that CscaNet has an anomaly percentage value of 1.73% in the KITTI2015 dataset, and an EPE of 0.74 px in the SceneFlow dataset, both of which are superior to GC-Net, DispNet, and PSMnet, and have higher reconstruction accuracy. The correlation between D and d is high and exhibits a positive correlation, while the correlation between D and dr is low. The geometric morphology expressions of small craters fitted by using D and d are significantly different from the expressions proposed by other scholars for large craters. This study provides a priori knowledge for the subsequent Von Karmen crater survey mission in the SPA Basin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Crater information extraction process: The starting data are in blue, the stage results in red, the operation and processing flow in green, and the model in yellow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Installation diagrams of the Yutu-2 stereo cameras.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Stereo navigation camera images containing the solar panels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Matching results of SURF for images from adjacent stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Structure of the CscaNet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the improved convolution operation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Structural diagram of the cross-scale cost volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of the 3D aggregation fusion of cross-scale cost volumes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Structural diagram of the 3D aggregation module for the cross-scale cost volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Precision of the 3D coordinates of the checkpoints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Geometric parameter measurement error distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Extracted 3D surfaces and profiles of crater point clouds: (<b>a</b>) Surface for point cloud 21; (<b>b</b>) surface for point cloud 32; (<b>c</b>) surface for point cloud 47; (<b>d</b>) transverse profile for point cloud 21; (<b>e</b>) transverse profile for point cloud 32; (<b>f</b>) transverse profile for point cloud 47; (<b>g</b>) longitudinal profile for point cloud 21; (<b>h</b>) longitudinal profile for point cloud 32; and (<b>i</b>) longitudinal profile for point cloud 47.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Schematic diagram of the topography of a simple crater.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Results of parallax estimation on the KITTI 2015 dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Results of parallax estimation on the SceneFlow dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Parallax maps for the first and seventeenth stereo images: Org_L and Org_R are stereo parallax maps of the first and seventeenth pairs of the navigation cameras; Csca are parallax maps generated based on the CscaNet algorithm; and PSM are parallax maps generated based on the PSMNet algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Point cloud comparison. The local effects of the stone crater point cloud and the crater point cloud (front and side) generated by the navigation image are represented by Org, Csca, and PSM. These effects are evaluated using the CscaNet and PSMnet algorithms. (<b>a</b>) Comparison of the stone crater point cloud; (<b>b</b>) comparison of the crater point cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>EPE comparison. (<b>Left</b>) Different convolution kernels and (<b>Right</b>) different hyperparameter <span class="html-italic">s</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The production process of the point cloud profile of a crater.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Schematic diagram of the principles of crater selection: (<b>a</b>) Shows an example of crater selection and (<b>b</b>) shows the distance of the crater from the rover, where “overall” stands for the overall crater, and “<span class="html-italic">L</span>” stands for the distance from the center of the crater to the center of the rover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Crater profile shape indicator statistical chart: (<b>a</b>) Histogram of crater diameter; (<b>b</b>) histogram of crater depth; and (<b>c</b>) histogram of the depth-to-diameter ratio of the crater. Note: In the figure, *_<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the profile crater index along the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">x</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-axis, *_<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the profile crater index along the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">y</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-axis, and Overall represents the overall crater. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> results retain one decimal place and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> results retain three decimal places.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Scatter plot of the depths, diameters, and depth–diameter ratios of craters. (<b>a</b>) Scatter distribution of the depths and diameters of the craters and (<b>b</b>) scatter distribution of the depth–diameter ratios and diameters of the craters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Overall fitting results of the x-axis and y-axis profiles. (<b>a</b>) The exponential fitting of depth and diameter; (<b>b</b>) the decimal logarithmic fitting of depth and diameter; (<b>c</b>) the exponential fitting of the depth–diameter ratio and diameter; and (<b>d</b>) the decimal logarithmic fitting of the depth–diameter ratio and diameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>The segmented fitting results of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">x</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-axis and y-axis profiles. (<b>a</b>) The exponential fitting of depth and diameter; (<b>b</b>) the decimal logarithmic fitting of depth and diameter; (<b>c</b>) the exponential fitting of the depth–diameter ratio and diameter; and (<b>d</b>) the decimal logarithmic fitting of the depth–diameter ratio and diameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>The segmented and overall fitting results. (<b>a</b>) The exponential fitting of depth and diameter; (<b>b</b>) the decimal logarithmic fitting of depth and diameter; (<b>c</b>) the exponential fitting of the depth–diameter ratio and diameter; and (<b>d</b>) the decimal logarithmic fitting of the depth–diameter ratio and diameter.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 9065 KiB  
Article
A Novel Approach for Permittivity Estimation of Lunar Regolith Using the Lunar Penetrating Radar Onboard Chang’E-4 Rover
by Ruigang Wang, Yan Su, Chunyu Ding, Shun Dai, Chendi Liu, Zongyu Zhang, Tiansheng Hong, Qing Zhang and Chunlai Li
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(18), 3679; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183679 - 15 Sep 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3847
Abstract
Accurate relative permittivity is essential to the further analysis of lunar regolith. The traditional hyperbola fitting method for the relative permittivity estimation using the lunar penetrating radar generally ignored the effect of the position and geometry of antennas. This paper proposed a new [...] Read more.
Accurate relative permittivity is essential to the further analysis of lunar regolith. The traditional hyperbola fitting method for the relative permittivity estimation using the lunar penetrating radar generally ignored the effect of the position and geometry of antennas. This paper proposed a new approach considering the antenna mounting height and spacing in more detail. The proposed method is verified by numerical simulations of the regolith models. Hence the relative permittivity of the lunar regolith is calculated using the latest high-frequency radar image obtained by the Yutu-2 rover within the first 24 lunar days. The simulation results show that the relative permittivity is underestimated when derived by the traditional method, especially at the shallow depth. The proposed method has improved the accuracy of the estimated lunar regolith relative permittivity at a depth of 0–3 m, 3–6 m, and 6–10 m by 35%, 14%, and 9%, respectively. The thickness of the lunar regolith at the Chang’E 4 landing site is reappraised to be 11.1 m, which improved by ~8% compared with previous studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planetary Remote Sensing: Chang’E-4/5 and Mars Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The landing site of the CE-4 and the traveling route of the Yutu-2 rover within the first 24 lunar days. (<b>a</b>) Geological background of the CE-4 landing area. The base map is obtained by Chang’E 2 camera. The image IDs include CE2_GRAS_DOM_07m_J240_38S175E_A, CE2_GRAS_DOM_07m_J201_38S175W_A, CE2_GRAS_DOM_07m_K101_45S175W_A, CE2_GRAS_DOM_07m_K136_45S175E_A. (<b>b</b>) The traveling path of Yutu-2 rover (red line). The base map is obtained by an LRO camera. The image ID is LRO_M1303619844. The green crosses both in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) indicate the CE-4 lander. The red dots mark the navigation points of the rover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The Yutu2 Rover and the structure of the CH2 Antenna [<a href="#B21-remotesensing-13-03679" class="html-bibr">21</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Schematic diagram of Yutu-2 Rover and the layout of the LPR antenna; (<b>b</b>) structure of the high-frequency antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of the propagation routine of electromagnetic waves. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Schematic diagram of Yutu-2 rover, regolith, and rocks. The rock is horizontally far away from the rover in (<b>a</b>) and is horizontally in the middle of the rover in (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) illustrates the signal propagation routine of (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>), respectively. The antenna height and spacing are <span class="html-italic">L</span> and <span class="html-italic">h</span>, respectively. The red points in (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) are the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna, the blue point is the middle of the antenna, representing the position of the rover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The established regolith model and simulation results. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Simulation models, representing the homogeneous model, the vertically increasing model, the stochastic model with fewer horizontal disturbances and the stochastic model with more horizontal disturbances; (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) indicate the calculated relative permittivity by the four models, respectively; (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>) represent the derived depth of reflectors in the four models, respectively. The red dash line indicates the error of ±5%. Besides the relative permittivity, the rock depth is another important parameter for geological interpretation, it can be calculated by the two methods and can be used to compare the two methods. Therefore, we showed the estimated rock depth along with the dielectric constant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The influence of antenna height on the hyperbola fitting method and the proposed method. Blue and red markers indicate the results of the hyperbola fitting method and the proposed method, respectively. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Represent the result of calculated relative permittivity for the simulation models with the relative permittivity of 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4, respectively. (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) Represent the results of the calculated depth for the simulation models with the relative permittivity of 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4, respectively. The two red dash lines indicate the ±5% error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The influence of antenna spacing on both methods. Blue and red markers indicate the results of the hyperbola fitting method and the proposed method, respectively. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Represent the result of the simulation models with the relative permittivity of 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4, respectively. (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) Represent the result of the simulation models with the relative permittivity of 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4, respectively. The two red dash lines indicate the ±5% error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The processed high-frequency LPR radar image within the first 24 lunar days. The radar image is obtained based on the level 2B data after bandpass filter (the corresponding filtering parameters are set to 100, 250, 750, 900 MHz, respectively), de-wow, background removal, and SEC gain. The red curves indicate the hyperbola picked in the radar image. The data used for imaging is available on the website <a href="http://moon.bao.ac.cn/" target="_blank">http://moon.bao.ac.cn/</a> (accessed on 10 March 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Several detailed structures of the hyperbola curve observed on the radar image. The red dash curve anchor the profile of the detected hyperbolic echo pattern. Each small region of the radar image is extracted from <a href="#remotesensing-13-03679-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The calculated relative permittivities of the lunar regolith and the converted depth. (<b>a</b>). The calculated relative permittivity by the two methods based on the LPR data. The red and blue dot indicates the relative permittivity calculated by the hyperbola fitting method and the proposed method, respectively. The green and maple line represents the fitted result of the relative permittivity estimated by the hyperbola fitting method and the proposed method, respectively. (<b>b</b>) The derived depth by different relative permittivity varies with time delay. The label “Traditional” represents the relative permittivity calculated by Li et al. [<a href="#B2-remotesensing-13-03679" class="html-bibr">2</a>] Constant relative permittivity is used for depth transform. The label <span class="html-italic">Proposed</span> indicates the result of the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 9471 KiB  
Article
A Photogrammetric-Photometric Stereo Method for High-Resolution Lunar Topographic Mapping Using Yutu-2 Rover Images
by Man Peng, Kaichang Di, Yexin Wang, Wenhui Wan, Zhaoqin Liu, Jia Wang and Lichun Li
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(15), 2975; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152975 - 28 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4029
Abstract
Topographic products are important for mission operations and scientific research in lunar exploration. In a lunar rover mission, high-resolution digital elevation models are typically generated at waypoints by photogrammetry methods based on rover stereo images acquired by stereo cameras. In case stereo images [...] Read more.
Topographic products are important for mission operations and scientific research in lunar exploration. In a lunar rover mission, high-resolution digital elevation models are typically generated at waypoints by photogrammetry methods based on rover stereo images acquired by stereo cameras. In case stereo images are not available, the stereo-photogrammetric method will not be applicable. Alternatively, photometric stereo method can recover topographic information with pixel-level resolution from three or more images, which are acquired by one camera under the same viewing geometry with different illumination conditions. In this research, we extend the concept of photometric stereo to photogrammetric-photometric stereo by incorporating collinearity equations into imaging irradiance model. The proposed photogrammetric-photometric stereo algorithm for surface construction involves three steps. First, the terrain normal vector in object space is derived from collinearity equations, and image irradiance equation for close-range topographic mapping is determined. Second, based on image irradiance equations of multiple images, the height gradients in image space can be solved. Finally, the height map is reconstructed through global least-squares surface reconstruction with spectral regularization. Experiments were carried out using simulated lunar rover images and actual lunar rover images acquired by Yutu-2 rover of Chang’e-4 mission. The results indicate that the proposed method achieves high-resolution and high-precision surface reconstruction, and outperforms the traditional photometric stereo methods. The proposed method is valuable for ground-based lunar surface reconstruction and can be applicable to surface reconstruction of Earth and other planets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planetary 3D Mapping, Remote Sensing and Machine Learning)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Framework of photogrammetric-photometric stereo (PPS) method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of rover image formation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of different imaging conditions (<b>a</b>) image and object coordinates for photometric stereo under orthographic projection (PSOP), (<b>b</b>) image and object coordinates for photometric stereo under perspective projection with identity matrix (PSPP), (<b>c</b>) image and object coordinates for PPS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) DEM and (<b>b</b>) DOM for rover image simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simulated images under different lighting conditions (<b>a</b>) simulate image of solar azimuth angle 90°and elevation angle 55° (<b>b</b>) simulate image of solar azimuth angle 90°and elevation angle 60° (<b>c</b>) simulate image of solar azimuth angle 90°and elevation angle 65° (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Height map of ground truth and results of three methods (<b>a</b>) Height map of ground truth, (<b>b</b>) PPS result, (<b>c</b>) PSPP result, (<b>d</b>) PSOP result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ROI 1 and reconstruction results of the three methods (<b>a</b>) Enlarged view of region 1, (<b>b</b>) ground truth, (<b>c</b>) PPS result, (<b>d</b>) PSPP result, (<b>e</b>) PSOP result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Height profile of ROI 1 in simulated imagery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>ROI 2 and reconstruction results of the three methods (<b>a</b>) Enlarged view of region 2, (<b>b</b>) ground truth (<b>c</b>) PPS result, (<b>d</b>) PSPP result, (<b>e</b>) PSOP result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Height profile of ROI 2 in simulated imagery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Navcam images of the left camera under different illumination conditions (<b>a</b>) 94741, (<b>b</b>) 94914, (<b>c</b>) 95633.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Examples of shadows (<b>a</b>) shadow inside two craters, (<b>b</b>) shadow inside a crater, (<b>c</b>) shadow behind a boulder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Shadow maps (<b>a</b>) Shadow map of image 94741, (<b>b</b>) Shadow map of image 94914, (<b>c</b>) Shadow map of image 95633, (<b>d</b>) Final shadow map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Two sub-regions of the image, (<b>b</b>) Shadow map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>ROI 1 and reconstruction results of the three methods (<b>a</b>) ROI 1 image, (<b>b</b>) SGM result, (<b>c</b>) PPS result, (<b>d</b>) shaded SGM result, (<b>e</b>) shaded PPS result, (<b>f</b>) PSPP result, (<b>g</b>) PSOP result, (<b>h</b>) Profile of the boulder (marked by the white circle in (<b>a</b>)) from PPS result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Height profile of ROI 1 in Yutu-2 rover imagery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>ROI 2 and reconstruction results of the three methods (<b>a</b>) ROI 2 image, (<b>b</b>) SGM result, (<b>c</b>) PPS result, (<b>d</b>) shaded SGM result, (<b>e</b>) shaded PPS result, (<b>f</b>) PSPP result, (<b>g</b>) PSOP result, (<b>h</b>) Profile of the boulder (marked by the white circle in (<b>a</b>)) from PPS result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17 Cont.
<p>ROI 2 and reconstruction results of the three methods (<b>a</b>) ROI 2 image, (<b>b</b>) SGM result, (<b>c</b>) PPS result, (<b>d</b>) shaded SGM result, (<b>e</b>) shaded PPS result, (<b>f</b>) PSPP result, (<b>g</b>) PSOP result, (<b>h</b>) Profile of the boulder (marked by the white circle in (<b>a</b>)) from PPS result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Height profile of ROI 2 in Yutu-2 rover imagery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Orthorectified images of ROI 1 in Yutu-2 rover imagery (<b>a</b>) ROI 1 of 94741, (<b>b</b>) ROI 1 of 94914, (<b>c</b>) ROI 1 of 95633.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Reconstruction DEM results of ROI1 by three methods (<b>a</b>) SGM interpolation result, (<b>b</b>) PPS interpolation result, (<b>c</b>) PSOP result from orthorectified images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Orthorectified images of ROI 2 in Yutu-2 rover imagery (<b>a</b>) ROI 2 of 94741, (<b>b</b>) ROI 2 of 94914, (<b>c</b>) ROI 2 of 95633.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Reconstruction results of ROI 2 by three methods (<b>a</b>) SGM interpolation result, (<b>b</b>) PPS interpolation result, (<b>c</b>) PSOP result for orthorectified images.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 17337 KiB  
Article
Effect of Lunar Complex Illumination on In Situ Measurements Obtained Using Visible and Near-Infrared Imaging Spectrometer of Chang’E-4
by Jiafei Xu, Meizhu Wang, Honglei Lin, Rong Wang, Qi Feng and Xuesen Xu
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(12), 2359; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122359 - 16 Jun 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2760
Abstract
In-situ measurements of the spectral information on the lunar surface are of significance to study the geological evolution of the Moon. China’s Chang’E-4 (CE-4) Yutu-2 rover has conducted several in-situ spectral explorations on the Moon. The visible and near-infrared imaging spectrometer (VNIS) onboard [...] Read more.
In-situ measurements of the spectral information on the lunar surface are of significance to study the geological evolution of the Moon. China’s Chang’E-4 (CE-4) Yutu-2 rover has conducted several in-situ spectral explorations on the Moon. The visible and near-infrared imaging spectrometer (VNIS) onboard the rover has acquired a series of in-situ spectra of the regolith at the landing site. In general, the mineralogical research of the lunar surface relies on the accuracy of the in-situ data. However, the spectral measurements of the Yutu-2 rover may be affected by shadows and stray illumination. In this study, we analyzed 106 CE-4 VNIS spectra acquired in the first 24 lunar days of the mission and noted that six of these spectra were affected by the shadows of the rover. Therefore, a method was established to correct the effects of the rover shadow on the spectral measurements. After shadow correction, the FeO content in the affected area is corrected to 14.46 wt.%, which was similar to the result calculated in the normal regolith. Furthermore, according to the visible images, certain areas of the explored sites were noted to be unusually bright. Considering the reflectance, geometric information, and shining patterns of the multi-layer insulation (MLI), we examined the influence of the specular reflection of the MLI on the bright spot regionsd, and found that the five sets of data were likely not affected by the specular reflection of the MLI. The results indicated that the complex illumination considerably influences the in situ spectral data. This study can provide a basis to analyze the VNIS scientific data and help enhance the accuracy of interpretation of the composition at CE-4 landing sites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lunar Remote Sensing and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Image obtained using the obstacle avoidance camera on the fourth lunar day of Chang’E-4 (CE-4) [<a href="#B3-remotesensing-13-02359" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. (<b>a</b>) The area marked by the red circle shows the stray light introduced by the specular reflection of the multi-layer insulation (MLI). The area marked by the yellow circle indicates the projection of the shadow of the rover onto the lunar surface. (<b>b</b>) Light paths of bright spots introduced by MLI specular reflection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Image of Yutu-2 rover at exploration site A. Visible and near-infrared imaging spectrometer (VNIS) mounted at the front of the rover, marked by the red rectangle in the picture. The VNIS detection area was marked by the white rectangle, which is approximately 1 m below the spectrometer, and less than 5 m from the center of the rover. This figure was obtained from the CE-4 Terrain Camera (TCAM) [<a href="#B1-remotesensing-13-02359" class="html-bibr">1</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Laboratory test setup. (<b>b</b>) Schematic. Numbers 1, 2 and 3 correspond to the three windows. Light source from window 1 entering the integrating sphere.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diffuse reflection and specular reflection reflectance curve of the F46 film.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Histogram of the distribution of illuminance and observation angle in the first 24 lunar days. (<b>a</b>) Relative azimuth angle statistics, with an interval of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mn>20</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </semantics></math>. The relative azimuth is the difference in the solar incident light azimuth and emission light azimuth. (<b>b</b>) Solar altitude angle statistics, with an interval of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Radiance images of the lunar surface observed by the Yutu-2 rover at 750 nm, affected by shadows. All the images are stretched from 0 to 0.05 to illustrate the albedo variation. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) correspond to image IDs N30, N39, N56, N57, N101 and N140, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Reflectance histogram of N30 detection area at 750 nm. (<b>b</b>) Shadow-corrected and uncorrected spectra of N30, N39, N140 in the VIS/NIR band after photometric correction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of reflectance after shadow correction and normal area reflectance. (<b>a</b>) Radiance image at 750 nm; the red rectangle marks the area in which the normal lunar soil is not obscured by shadows. (<b>b</b>) We randomly chose 100 pixels of the normal areas marked in (<b>a</b>) five times. The blue curve shows the mean reflectance factor (RADF) curve of them and their standard deviation; the reflectance is significantly enhanced after shadow correction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Radiance images of lunar surface observed by the Yutu-2 rover. The images are stretched from 0 to 0.08 to illustrate the albedo variation. The red rectangles indicate the obvious bright spot areas. The normal areas were marked by the green rectangle. The image IDs are N130, N131, and N132. (<b>d</b>) Schematic of the angle relationships between the illumination angle and vehicle body orientation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Comparison of normalized reflectance in the VIS/NIR band of N130, N131, N132, and F46 film. The arrow indicates the wide absorption (750–850 nm) of the F46 film measured in the laboratory. The bright region marked by the red rectangle in <a href="#remotesensing-13-02359-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a> is considered to calculate the average reflectance of the abnormal region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Radiance images of the lunar surface observed by the Yutu-2 rover at 750 nm. The images are stretched from 0 to 0.06 to illustrate the albedo variation. The image IDs are N65 and N66. The area marked by the red rectangle is the same lunar soil area considered for image matching.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7968 KiB  
Article
Photometric Normalization of Chang’e-4 Visible and Near-Infrared Imaging Spectrometer Datasets: A Combined Study of In-Situ and Laboratory Spectral Measurements
by Xiaobin Qi, Zongcheng Ling, Jiang Zhang, Jian Chen, Haijun Cao, Changqing Liu, Le Qiao, Xiaohui Fu, Zhiping He, Rui Xu, Jianzhong Liu and Yongliao Zou
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(19), 3211; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193211 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4172
Abstract
Until 29 May 2020, the Visible and Near-Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (VNIS) onboard the Yutu-2 Rover of the Chang’e-4 (CE-4) has acquired 96 high-resolution surface in-situ imaging spectra. These spectra were acquired under different illumination conditions, thus photometric normalization should be conducted to correct [...] Read more.
Until 29 May 2020, the Visible and Near-Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (VNIS) onboard the Yutu-2 Rover of the Chang’e-4 (CE-4) has acquired 96 high-resolution surface in-situ imaging spectra. These spectra were acquired under different illumination conditions, thus photometric normalization should be conducted to correct the introduced albedo differences before deriving the quantitative mineralogy for accurate geologic interpretations. In this study, a Lommel–Seeliger (LS) model and Hapke radiative transfer (Hapke) model were used and empirical phase functions of the LS model were derived. The values of these derived phase functions exhibit declining trends with the increase in phase angles and the opposition effect and phase reddening effect were observed. Then, we discovered from in-situ and laboratory measurements that the shadows caused by surface roughness have significant impacts on reflectance spectra and proper corrections were introduced. The validations of different phase functions showed that the maximum discrepancy at 1500 nm of spectra corrected by the LS model was less (~3.7%) than that by the Hapke model (~7.4%). This is the first time that empirical phase functions have been derived for a wavelength from 450 to 2395 nm using in-situ visible and near-infrared spectral datasets. Generally, photometrically normalized spectra exhibit smaller spectral slopes, lower FeO contents and larger optical maturity parameter (OMAT) than spectra without correction. In addition, the band centers of the 1 and 2 μm absorption features of spectra after photometric normalization exhibit a more concentrated distribution, indicating the compositional homogeneity of soils at the CE-4 landing site. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lunar Remote Sensing and Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Orbital view of the Chang’e-4 (CE-4) landing site. (<b>a</b>) Nomenclature of major features surrounding the CE-4 landing site on Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter Digital Elevation Model; (<b>b</b>) the traverse map of Yutu-2 in the first 17 lunar days (overlaid on Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera Narrow Angle Camera Digital Terrain Model). Yutu-2 did not move in the eighteenth lunar day; each exploration site in different lunar days is marked by circles with different colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Reflectance images at 750 nm of the two detection targets measured in the tenth lunar day. Addition labels of pixels were added to the first Visible and Near-Infrared (VNIR) image; the red circles and number labels indicate Field of View (FOV) of Shortwave Infrared (SWIR) spectrometer and data filename released at the Data Release and Information Service System of China’s Lunar Exploration Program; a schematic diagram of the relationship between incident, emission and phase angles is placed in the upper left corner of <a href="#remotesensing-12-03211-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Three-dimensional phase functions for the Lommel–Seeliger (LS) model derived from observations 0068-0090. (<b>a</b>) VNIR spectral regions; (<b>b</b>) SWIR spectral regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparisons of initial photometric correction results of Hapke radiative transfer (Hapke) model and Lommel–Seeliger (LS) model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparisons of the photometric correction results of (<b>a</b>) raw reflectance factor (REFF) spectra of lunar regolith analog obtained by VNIS replica at different phase angles; (<b>b</b>) spectra of lunar regolith analog corrected with LS model; (<b>c</b>) spectra of lunar regolith analog corrected with Hapke model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) REFF images at 750 nm of CE-4-VNIS-0068; (<b>b</b>) color mapping of CE-4-VNIS-0068 at 750 nm; (<b>c</b>) the linear relationship between shadowed pixels in VNIR image and reflectance at 750 nm (observations 0068-0079); (<b>d</b>) the linear relationship between shadowed pixels in VNIR image and reflectance at 1500 nm (observations 0068-0079). The red circle indicates FOV of SWIR spectrometer; green: pixels with REFF (465 nm) &gt;0.02; red: pixels with REFF (465 nm) &gt;0.02, were regarded as shadowed pixels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparisons of photometric correction results of the CE-4 VNIS spectra measured on the tenth lunar day (target 1). (<b>a</b>) Spectra that are only shadow-corrected; (<b>b</b>) spectra after shadow correction corrected by LS model; (<b>c</b>) spectra of the first target corrected by Hapke model (b = −0.4 and c = 0.25); (<b>d</b>) spectra of the first target corrected by Hapke model (b = −0.17 and c = 0.70).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plot between photometrically normalized VNIS spectra of the same target and at different illumination geometries. (<b>a</b>) Before shadow effect corrections (LS model); (<b>b</b>) after shadow effect corrections (LS model); (<b>c</b>) before shadow effect corrections (Hapke model, Mustard parameters); (<b>d</b>) after shadow effect corrections (Hapke model, Mustard parameters); (<b>e</b>) after shadow effect corrections (Hapke model, YZ parameters). The dashed line denotes the two spectra are coincident; NSR—no shadow effects removed; SR—shadow effects removed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Part of the CE-4 VNIS spectra obtained during 1–18 lunar days; (<b>b</b>) photometric normalization results of CE-3 VNIR spectra using LS model; (<b>c</b>) spectral slopes of CE-3 and CE-4 measurements; (<b>d</b>) integrated band depth (IBD) of 1μm absorption (CE-3 and CE-4 measurements); (<b>e</b>) band center positions of the CE-3 and CE-4 VNIS detections overlain on band centers of pyroxene [<a href="#B6-remotesensing-12-03211" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B62-remotesensing-12-03211" class="html-bibr">62</a>,<a href="#B63-remotesensing-12-03211" class="html-bibr">63</a>]. Mg-PX: Mg-rich pyroxene.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5423 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Noise in the In Situ Hyperspectral Data Acquired by Chang’E-4 and Its Effects on Spectral Analysis of Regolith
by Honglei Lin, Yangting Lin, Yong Wei, Rui Xu, Yang Liu, Yazhou Yang, Sen Hu, Wei Yang and Zhiping He
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(10), 1603; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101603 - 18 May 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3504
Abstract
The Chang’E-4 (CE-4) spacecraft landed successfully on the far side of the Moon on 3 January 2019, and the rover Yutu-2 has explored the lunar surface since then. The visible and near-infrared imaging spectrometer (VNIS) onboard the rover has acquired numerous spectra, providing [...] Read more.
The Chang’E-4 (CE-4) spacecraft landed successfully on the far side of the Moon on 3 January 2019, and the rover Yutu-2 has explored the lunar surface since then. The visible and near-infrared imaging spectrometer (VNIS) onboard the rover has acquired numerous spectra, providing unprecedented insight into the composition of the lunar surface. However, the noise in these spectral data and its effects on spectral interpretation are not yet assessed. Here we analyzed repeated measurements over the same area at the lunar surface to estimate the signal–noise ratio (SNR) of the VNIS spectra. Using the results, we assessed the effects of noise on the estimation of band centers, band depths, FeO content, optical maturity (OMAT), mineral abundances, and submicroscopic metallic iron (SMFe). The data observed at solar altitudes <20° exhibit low SNR (25 dB), whereas the data acquired at 20°–35° exhibit higher SNR (35–37 dB). We found differences in band centers due to noise to be ~6.2 and up to 28.6 nm for 1 and 2 μm absorption, respectively. We also found that mineral abundances derived using the Hapke model are affected by noise, with maximum standard deviations of 6.3%, 2.4%, and 7.0% for plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine, respectively. Our results suggest that noise has significant impacts on the CE-4 spectra, which should be considered in the spectral analysis and geologic interpretation of lunar exploration data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lunar Remote Sensing and Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Schematic of working mode of the Yutu-2 rover at lunar surface and the major specifications of visible and near-infrared (VNIR) imaging spectrometer [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-12-01603" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. The field of view (FOV) of the complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) imager is ~15 cm × 21 cm because of the different resolution in the horizontal and vertical directions. The FOV of the short-wavelength near-infrared (SWIR) detector is a circle with a diameter of 107.6 CMOS pixels and is centered at sample 98, line 127.5 within the FOV of the CMOS imager. Only a spectrum can be obtained by SWIR detector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The CMOS images of lunar surface observed by Yutu-2 rover. (<b>a</b>) The images of the same regolith area measured at different solar altitudes. (<b>b</b>) The repeated measurements of rock-bearing areas. The size of CMOS image is ~15 × 21cm. The yellow circle is the field of view of the SWIR detector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The scatterplot of the local mean radiance values and the local standard deviations at 0.945 μm and their correlation coefficients at all bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Endmember spectra used in this study. (<b>a</b>) Pyroxene. (<b>b</b>) Plagioclase. (<b>c</b>) Olivine. (<b>d</b>) Ilmenite. The minerals were separated from the Apollo samples, which were collected in Lunar Rock and Mineral Characterization Consortium (LMRCC) database [<a href="#B42-remotesensing-12-01603" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The rock measured by Yutu-2 rover. (<b>a</b>) The CMOS image of the rock. The red regions are the fresh rock surface. (<b>b</b>) The average reflectance spectrum of the fresh rock surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Signal–noise ratio (SNR) of the CMOS image. (<b>a</b>) The SNR versus wavelength at different solar altitude. (<b>b</b>) The SNR versus solar altitude. (<b>c</b>) The SNR versus irradiance of solar energy at 0.75 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The spectra and their differences acquired from the same rock-bearing area. (<b>a</b>) The spectra of 0106 and 0107. (<b>b</b>) The spectra of 0109 and 0110. (<b>c</b>) The difference of the spectra between 0106 and 0107. (<b>d</b>) The difference of the spectra between 0109 and 0110.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The continuum-removed spectra and band centers and depths of rock-bearing areas. (<b>a</b>) The continuum-removed spectra of the paired measurements with small difference of solar altitudes. (<b>b</b>) The continuum-removed spectra of the paired measurements with large difference of solar altitudes. (<b>c</b>) The positions of the band centers. (<b>d</b>) The band depths. The lines in (<b>c</b>) and (<b>d</b>) are error bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The band centers of the regolith spectra measured by Yutu-2 rover and their shifts caused by the data noise. The b1 and b2 indicate the 1 μm band center and 2 μm band center, respectively. The black dots and gray triangles represent spectral features of the Apollo samples included in the LSCC database. For obtaining the accurate band centers of Apollo samples, only the spectra with strong absorptions were plotted (48 of 76 samples).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The variation of mineral abundances caused by the noise in the hyperspectral data acquired by CE-4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The variations of (<b>a</b>) SMFe abundance and (<b>b</b>) particle size of lunar regolith caused by the noise in the hyperspectral data acquired by CE-4.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7641 KiB  
Article
A Compressive Sensing-Based Approach to Reconstructing Regolith Structure from Lunar Penetrating Radar Data at the Chang’E-3 Landing Site
by Kun Wang, Zhaofa Zeng, Ling Zhang, Shugao Xia and Jing Li
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(12), 1925; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121925 - 30 Nov 2018
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3702
Abstract
Lunar Penetrating Radar (LPR) is one of the important scientific systems onboard the Yutu lunar rover for the purpose of detecting the lunar regolith and the subsurface geologic structures of the lunar regolith, providing the opportunity to map the subsurface structure and vertical [...] Read more.
Lunar Penetrating Radar (LPR) is one of the important scientific systems onboard the Yutu lunar rover for the purpose of detecting the lunar regolith and the subsurface geologic structures of the lunar regolith, providing the opportunity to map the subsurface structure and vertical distribution of the lunar regolith with a high resolution. In this paper, in order to improve the capability of identifying response signals caused by discrete reflectors (such as meteorites, basalt debris, etc.) beneath the lunar surface, we propose a compressive sensing (CS)-based approach to estimate the amplitudes and time delays of the radar signals from LPR data. In this approach, the total-variation (TV) norm was used to estimate the signal parameters by a set of Fourier series coefficients. For this, we chose a nonconsecutive and random set of Fourier series coefficients to increase the resolution of the underlying target signal. After a numerical analysis of the performance of the CS algorithm, a complicated numerical example using a 2D lunar regolith model with clipped Gaussian random permittivity was established to verify the validity of the CS algorithm for LPR data. Finally, the compressive sensing-based approach was applied to process 500-MHz LPR data and reconstruct the target signal’s amplitudes and time delays. In the resulting image, it is clear that the CS-based approach can improve the identification of the target’s response signal in a complex lunar environment. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The 1D lunar regolith model (Rx: receive antenna; Tx: transmitting antenna) and (<b>b</b>) the LPR response signal of the 1D lunar regolith model with the direct waves removed (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The results of the first numerical experiment. (<b>a</b>) The continuous time Fourier transformation of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) Estimated parameters by the CS algorithm in Bandwidth 1 (B1). (<b>c</b>) Estimated parameters by the CS algorithm in B2. (<b>d</b>) Estimated parameters by the CS algorithm in B3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Estimated value of a2 from B1 obtained by executing the CS algorithm 60 times for numerical experiments. The average value (AVG) is 0.2553, and the standard deviation (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math>) is 0.0025.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LPR data with periodic noise and parameters estimated by the CS algorithm. (<b>a</b>) The frequencies of the sine interference are 200 and 800 MHz; (<b>b</b>) the frequencies of the sine interference are 450 and 550 MHz).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LPR data with Gaussian noise and the parameters estimated by the CS algorithm. (<b>a</b>) Noise level: −30 dB; (<b>b</b>) noise level: −20 dB; (<b>c</b>) noise level: −10 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) The 2D random regolith model. (<b>b</b>) Permittivity trend at 5 m (black dotted line in (<b>a</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) A snapshot of a radar wave in 28.8 ns at 5 m. (<b>b</b>) Simulation results of the 2D regolith model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) A single trace in 5 m (red line in <a href="#remotesensing-10-01925-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>b) and the parameters estimated by the CS algorithm. (<b>b</b>) Image of the estimated absolute amplitudes of the simulated LPR profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Yutu lunar rover’s route [<a href="#B6-remotesensing-10-01925" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B16-remotesensing-10-01925" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. The red line from C to D is the research route (10 m). We added a distance coordinate system, with the lander as the coordinate origin (0, 0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) The original LPR data extracted from the raw data, (<b>b</b>) the preprocessed LPR data, (<b>c</b>) a signal trace of the LPR data at 7.5 m (black line), and (<b>d</b>) a signal trace of the preprocessed LPR data at 7.5 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>A single trace of LPR data at 6 m and parameters estimated by the CS-based approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The LPR profile overlaid with the CS-based approach processing results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Absolute amplitude image of LPR data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Interpretation of the LPR data from C to D (<a href="#remotesensing-10-01925-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop