[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (47)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Yellow River Basin urban agglomeration

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 7714 KiB  
Article
How to Consider Human Footprints to Assess Human Disturbance: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin
by Sirui Luo, Xiangxue Li, Jie Yang and Xingwei Li
Land 2024, 13(12), 2163; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122163 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 638
Abstract
Natural processes are substantially impacted by human activity, and assessing human activity has significant ramifications for regional ecological conservation. The study developed an extended human footprint (HF) assessment model based on the theory of ecological effects and human pressures to evaluate human disturbances [...] Read more.
Natural processes are substantially impacted by human activity, and assessing human activity has significant ramifications for regional ecological conservation. The study developed an extended human footprint (HF) assessment model based on the theory of ecological effects and human pressures to evaluate human disturbances in the urban agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin using data from 2005 to 2020, revealing the spatiotemporal pattern in the region. The conclusions show that the HF value of urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin has steadily increased from 2005 to 2020, primarily driven by mining intensity and road construction. High HF areas are primarily concentrated in urban areas in the south-central of the region, with a tendency to spread outward. Medium HF areas are mainly distributed in the eastern part of the study area, and the spatial distribution increases year by year, extending outward from the center area. The moderately low and HF areas are mostly found in the mountainous areas of the northwest. Among the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, the Central Plains UA and Shandong Peninsula UA are the areas most heavily affected by human disturbance. The conclusions are instructive for the high-quality development of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Contexts and Urban-Rural Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Research framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The HF value distribution of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, 2005–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The spatiotemporal pattern of the HF in the urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin, 2005–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The amplitude of change in the HF and the direction of flow in the urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin, 2005–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The HF distribution of seven major urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, 2005–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes in the HF of seven major urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, 2005–2020.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 9219 KiB  
Article
Exploring How Aerosol Optical Depth Varies in the Yellow River Basin and Its Urban Agglomerations by Decade
by Yinan Zhao, Qingxin Tang, Zhenting Hu, Quanzhou Yu and Tianquan Liang
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1466; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121466 - 8 Dec 2024
Viewed by 416
Abstract
In this study, the spatial–temporal characteristics of AOD in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) and urban agglomerations within the basin were analyzed at a 1 km scale from 2011 to 2020 based on the MCD19A2 AOD dataset. This study shows the following: (1) [...] Read more.
In this study, the spatial–temporal characteristics of AOD in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) and urban agglomerations within the basin were analyzed at a 1 km scale from 2011 to 2020 based on the MCD19A2 AOD dataset. This study shows the following: (1) From 2011 to 2020, the AOD value of the YRB showed a declining trend, with 96.011% of the zones experiencing a decrease in AOD. The spatial distribution of AOD displayed a pattern of high in the east, low in the west, high in the south, and low in the north. The rate of decline showed a distribution pattern of fast in the southeast and slow in the northwest. (2) The AOD in the YRB showed similar characteristics in different seasons: the south and east were consistently higher than the north and west. The seasonal AOD values in the YRB showed the following pattern: summer > spring > autumn > winter. The AOD values of urban agglomeration were basically larger in spring and summer. (3) The SDE and mean center of the yearly AOD were located in the southeast and Shanxi Province, with the movement from southeast to northwest. It can be divided into three stages based on the movement trajectory: northeast–southwest round-trip movement (2011–2014), one-way movement to the northwest (2014–2018), and southeast–northwest round-trip movement (2018–2020). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Air Quality Assessment: Forecasting and Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study areas (seven major urban agglomerations in the YRB: Lanzhou—Xining (LX), Ningxia along the YR (NXYH), Hubao Eyu (HBEY), Guanzhong Basin (GZB), Jinzhong (JZ), central plains (ZY), and Jinan metropolitan area (JN)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Interannual variation and (<b>b</b>) spatial pattern of AOD in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rate of change in annual AOD, and (<b>b</b>) rate of change in AOD for an MK significance greater than 95% from 2011 to 2020 in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of AOD distribution in the YRB in (<b>a</b>) spring, (<b>b</b>) summer, (<b>c</b>) autumn, and (<b>d</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Differences in quarterly AOD among urban agglomerations in the YRB in (<b>a</b>) spring, (<b>b</b>) summer, (<b>c</b>) autumn, and (<b>d</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in the SDE and mean center of AOD in the YRB urban agglomeration from 2011 to 2020 ((<b>a</b>) from 2011 to 2014; (<b>b</b>) from 2014 to 2018; (<b>c</b>) from 2018 to 2020; (<b>d</b>) from 2011 to 2020; and (<b>e</b>) from 2011 to 2020).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2953 KiB  
Article
The Integrated Development and Regional Disparities of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, China
by Zhenxing Jin, Chao Teng, Xumin Jiao, Yi Miao and Chengxin Wang
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10353; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310353 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 529
Abstract
This study develops an evaluation system to assess the integration levels of the seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin. Based on the weighted comprehensive indicator-based evaluation and Dagum’s Gini decompositions, it evaluates the integration of these urban agglomerations as well as [...] Read more.
This study develops an evaluation system to assess the integration levels of the seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin. Based on the weighted comprehensive indicator-based evaluation and Dagum’s Gini decompositions, it evaluates the integration of these urban agglomerations as well as their regional disparities from 2010 to 2022. The results show the following: (1) During the study period, the overall integration level of these urban agglomerations exhibited a general upward trend, although significant gaps still exist, with a spatial pattern of “lower reaches > middle reaches > upper reaches”. Moreover, after 2019, the integration accelerated markedly, indicating that the Yellow River Strategy has positively influenced the integration of these urban agglomerations. (2) Significant differences exist between the urban agglomerations in different dimensions of integration, although the gap has shown a fluctuating but narrowing trend. In addition, the degree of integration across different dimensions has been increasing annually for all urban agglomerations, except for the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration. The focus of integration varies among these urban agglomerations due to their differing stages of development. (3) In terms of regional disparities, the overall Gini coefficient displayed a “reverse U-shaped” decline, suggesting that while the gap in integration between the urban agglomerations has been narrowing over time, imbalances persist. Inter-group differences are the primary source contributing to the overall disparities in the integration levels of the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Research framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of average annual growth rates of urban agglomeration integration levels in the Yellow River Basin across time periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of integration levels across different dimensions for urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dagum’s Gini decompositions for urban agglomeration integration levels in the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 3391 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Urban High-Quality Development Level Using a Three-Stage Stacks-Based Measure Model: A Case Study of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin
by Sisi Liu, Suchang Yang and Ningyi Liu
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 8130; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188130 - 18 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 774
Abstract
The high-quality development paradigm, which emphasizes the organic unity of efficiency, equity, and sustainability, has gained increasing global recognition as an extension of the concept of sustainable green development. In this study, we use green development efficiency as a metric of high-quality development [...] Read more.
The high-quality development paradigm, which emphasizes the organic unity of efficiency, equity, and sustainability, has gained increasing global recognition as an extension of the concept of sustainable green development. In this study, we use green development efficiency as a metric of high-quality development and employ a three-stage Stacks-based Measure Model (SBM) in order to assess the true green development efficiency (GDE) levels of urban agglomerations in China’s Yellow River Basin (YRB) from 2011 to 2020. The results indicate that external environmental factors significantly impacted the green development efficiency levels of these urban agglomerations; after removing these factors, their green development efficiency shifted from trendless fluctuations to more consistent upward trends. Additionally, the disparities between different urban agglomerations are the primary sources of overall differences in green development efficiency in the YRB. Influenced by economic development levels and administrative divisions, the degree of internal development imbalance varies among urban agglomerations; however, regional disparities show a decreasing trend, indicating a catch-up effect. Based on these findings, we further propose relevant policy recommendations in this paper. The results of this study help us to understand the current status and trends of high-quality development in the urban agglomerations of the YRB, providing empirical evidence for policy formulation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The research framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The research framework of the three-stage SBM dynamic analysis model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The urban agglomeration layout of the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The original GDE trends of urban agglomerations in the YRB from 2011 to 2020 and (<b>b</b>) the actual GDE trends of urban agglomerations in the YRB from 2011 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution changes in the actual GDE across urban agglomerations in the YRB from 2011 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in the overall actual GDE disparities across urban agglomerations in the YRB from 2011 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes in the actual GDE disparities across urban agglomerations in the YRB from 2011 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes in the actual GDE disparities between urban agglomerations in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 4861 KiB  
Article
Spatial Evolution and Driving Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in the Yellow River Basin
by Ningyi Liu, Yongyu Wang and Sisi Liu
Sustainability 2024, 16(14), 6063; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146063 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 919
Abstract
Ecological well-being performance (EWP) is a key indicator of sustainable development and has garnered significant research attention. This study measures the overall and stage-by-stage efficiency of the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin based on the ends–means framework of steady-state economics. This [...] Read more.
Ecological well-being performance (EWP) is a key indicator of sustainable development and has garnered significant research attention. This study measures the overall and stage-by-stage efficiency of the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin based on the ends–means framework of steady-state economics. This study then delves into the spatiotemporal transfer characteristics of EWP through Moran’s I, and spatial Markov chains. Additionally, this research investigates the factors influencing EWP using a random forest model. The findings indicate a notable enhancement in EWP in the urban agglomerations in the YRB from 2006 to 2021, showing clear spatial agglomeration patterns. The shift in EWP types displays a “path dependence” effect, with distinct evolutionary paths influenced by spatial lag effects. Ecological input emerges as a key internal driver of EWP, while urbanization and technological advancements are highlighted as significant external factors. Industrial agglomeration and industrial structure also contribute to improving EWP. The findings of this study help to clarify the spatial and temporal characteristics of ecological welfare performance and its driving mechanisms in the urban agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin. This is conducive to the achievement of high-quality urban transformation and regional green development, and it provides a reference for the construction of an ecological civilization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of YRB (based on the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources Standard Map Production (Survey Approval Number GS (2023) 2767); the base map boundaries remain unaltered).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Stage decomposition of EWP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of the random forest model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Research flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal changes in EWP and decomposition stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LISA clustering of EWP and decomposition stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Markov transfer probability matrices for EWP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Feature importance of EWP internal factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ranking of importance of EWP external features; (<b>b</b>) important feature partial dependence plot.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4458 KiB  
Article
Construction of Ecological Security Patterns and Evaluation of Ecological Network Stability under Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study in Desert–Oasis Area of the Yellow River Basin, China
by Wenhao Cheng, Caihong Ma, Tongsheng Li and Yuanyuan Liu
Land 2024, 13(7), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071037 - 10 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1020
Abstract
Land use change has a significant impact on the sustainability of ecosystems, and ecological security patterns (ESPs) can improve environmental quality through spatial planning. This study explored a multi-scenario ESP framework by integrating future land use simulation (FLUS) and minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) [...] Read more.
Land use change has a significant impact on the sustainability of ecosystems, and ecological security patterns (ESPs) can improve environmental quality through spatial planning. This study explored a multi-scenario ESP framework by integrating future land use simulation (FLUS) and minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) for urban agglomeration along the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in Ningxia. The research involved simulating land use change in 2035 under four development scenarios, identifying ecological security networks, and evaluating network stability for each scenario. The study revealed that the ecological sources under different development scenarios, including a natural development scenario (NDS), an economic development scenario (EDS), a food security scenario (FSS), and an ecological protection scenario (EPS), were 834.82 km2, 715.46 km2, 785.56 km2, and 1091.43 km2, respectively. The overall connectivity values (OG) for these scenarios were 0.351, 0.466, 0.334, and 0.520, respectively. It was found that under an EPS, the ESPs had the largest area of ecological sources and the most stable ecological network structure, which can effectively protect natural habitats. This study provides a valuable method for identifying ESPs that can respond to diversity and the uncertainty of future development. It can assist decision-makers in enhancing the ecological quality of the study area while considering various development scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Framework of the integration of future ecological security patterns (ESPs) for land use simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Land use transfer probability matrix for 2015–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of land use types under the simulation of multiple scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ecological sources under multiple scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Surfaces indicating ecological resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Ecological corridors in 2035 under multiple scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8025 KiB  
Article
Impact of Urban Expansion on Carbon Emissions in the Urban Agglomerations of Yellow River Basin, China
by Zhenwei Wang, Yi Zeng, Xiaochun Wang, Tianci Gu and Wanxu Chen
Land 2024, 13(5), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050651 - 10 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1629
Abstract
Continued urban expansion (UE) has long been regarded as a huge challenge for climate change mitigation. However, much less is known about how UE affects carbon emissions (CEs), especially in the urban agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin (UAYRB), China. In this regard, [...] Read more.
Continued urban expansion (UE) has long been regarded as a huge challenge for climate change mitigation. However, much less is known about how UE affects carbon emissions (CEs), especially in the urban agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin (UAYRB), China. In this regard, this study introduced kernel density analysis, the Gini coefficient, and Markov chains to reveal the UE patterns and carbon emissions intensity (CEI) in the UAYRB at the county level, and explored the spatial heterogeneity of the impact of UE on CEI with the geographically and temporally weighted regression model. The results show that both CEI and UE in the UAYRB showed a steady growing trend during the study period. The kernel density of CEI and UE revealed that CEI in the UAYRB was weakening, while the UE rate continuously slowed down. The Gini coefficients of both CEI and UE in the UAYRB region were at high levels, indicating obvious spatial imbalance. The Markov transfer probability matrix for CEI with a time span of five years showed that CEI growth will still occur over the next five years, while that of UE was more obvious. Meanwhile, counties with a regression coefficient of UE on CEI higher than 0 covered the majority, and the distribution pattern remained quite stable. The regression coefficients of different urban landscape metrics on CEI in the UAYRB varied greatly; except for the landscape shape index, the regression coefficients of the aggregation index, interspersion and juxtaposition index, and patch density overall remained positive. These findings can advance the policy enlightenment of the high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Basic flowchart of the method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CEI in the UAYRB during 2000–2020. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) are the CEI in the UAYRB in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>UE patterns in the UAYRB during 2000–2020. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) are the UE pattern in the UAYRB in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial pattern of urban landscape metrics in the UAYRB during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Kernel density contour map of CEI and UE. (<b>a</b>) is the kernel density of CEI with a time span of 5 years. (<b>b</b>) is the kernel density of CEI with a time span of 10 years. (<b>c</b>) is the kernel density of UE with a time span of 5 years. (<b>d</b>) is the kernel density of UE with a time span of 10 years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Gini coefficient of CEI and UE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Regression coefficient of UE on CEI in the UAYRB during 2000–2020. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) are the regression coefficient of UE on CEI in the UAYRB in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Regression coefficient of urban landscape metrics on CEI in the UAYRB during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 19157 KiB  
Case Report
Deep Learning-Based Approach for Optimizing Urban Commercial Space Expansion Using Artificial Neural Networks
by Dawei Yang, Jiahui Zhao and Ping Xu
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 3845; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093845 - 30 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1032
Abstract
Amid escalating urbanization, devising rational commercial space layouts is a critical challenge. By leveraging machine learning, this study used a backpropagation (BP) neural network to optimize commercial spaces in Weinan City’s central urban area. The results indicate an increased number of commercial facilities [...] Read more.
Amid escalating urbanization, devising rational commercial space layouts is a critical challenge. By leveraging machine learning, this study used a backpropagation (BP) neural network to optimize commercial spaces in Weinan City’s central urban area. The results indicate an increased number of commercial facilities with a trend of multi-centered agglomeration and outward expansion. Based on these findings, we propose a strategic framework for rational commercial space development that emphasizes aggregation centers, development axes, and spatial guidelines. This strategy provides valuable insights for urban planners in small- and medium-sized cities in the Yellow River Basin and metropolitan areas, ultimately showcasing the power of machine learning in enhancing urban planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Machine Learning in Earth Sciences—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The district of Weinan City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>POI data diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>BP neural network algorithm diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>R<sup>2</sup> score and error of neurons in each layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>R<sup>2</sup> score and error line in momentum-learning rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Static density variation diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Forecasted commercial static density diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Multi-center space layout diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Axis development diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Space guide diagram.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 3749 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Water-Energy-Food-Carbon System Vulnerability: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin, China
by Lei Tong and Mengdie Luo
Sustainability 2024, 16(3), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031002 - 24 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1118
Abstract
With the growing influences of anthropogenic activities and climatic change, the problem concerning the vulnerability of the Water-Energy-Food-Carbon (WEFC) system in the Yellow River Basin is prominent. Using the VSD framework, the WEFC system vulnerability evaluation index system was constructed with 60 cities [...] Read more.
With the growing influences of anthropogenic activities and climatic change, the problem concerning the vulnerability of the Water-Energy-Food-Carbon (WEFC) system in the Yellow River Basin is prominent. Using the VSD framework, the WEFC system vulnerability evaluation index system was constructed with 60 cities in the Yellow River Basin as the samples, and the WEFC system vulnerability of each city was measured from 2010 to 2019. Kernel density estimation, Theil index, and spatial correlation analysis were employed to investigate spatio-temporal evolution characteristics. Geodetector was utilized to analyze the driving factors of WEFC system vulnerability. The results demonstrate that: (1) The vulnerability of the WEFC system in the Yellow River Basin tends to decrease, with a spatial pattern of “low in the middle and high on both sides”; the vulnerability is largest in the upper and lower reaches, while smallest in the middle reaches. (2) The spatial difference in vulnerability narrows in the middle and lower reaches, while expanding in the upper reaches. The differences among the three major regions mainly originate from within the region, with the upper reaches having the largest difference and contribution; the vulnerability is featured with a significant spatial correlation, with the upper and lower reaches cities mostly displaying a “high-high” agglomeration and the middle reaches mainly showing a “low-low” one. (3) Factors, including the carbon and ecological carrying capacity coefficient, water resource development and utilization rate, and urbanization rate, mainly influence the WEFC system vulnerability; the spatial heterogeneity of core drivers at the regional scale is obvious, with the upper reaches regions being more strongly influenced by factors of the water resources system, while the middle and lower reaches regions are more sensitive to factors concerning industrial pollution of the energy subsystem. The explanatory power of carbon ecological carrying capacity reaches its peak in the middle reaches. The interaction of factors increases the strength of the impact on vulnerability. This study provides decision support and policy suggestions for achieving a balanced and coordinated development of water resource utilization, energy development, food production, and carbon cycle system in the Yellow River Basin. Investigating WEFC system vulnerability to support SDG 11 provided valuable insights and policy strategies for building cities that are inclusive, secure, resource-efficient, and resilient in the face of climate change and disaster risks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Development Goals towards Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Trends of WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin and the upper middle and lower reaches from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution pattern of WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamic evolution of WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Theil index decomposition of WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019. (<b>a</b>) The evolving trends of inter-regional and intra-regional disparities in WEFC system vulnerability in the upper reaches, middle reaches, and lower reaches regions of the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019. (<b>b</b>) The contributions of inter-regional and intra-regional disparities in WEFC system vulnerability in the upper reaches, middle reaches, and lower reaches regions of the Yellow River Basin to the overall regional WEFC system vulnerability disparity from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Global Moran’s index of WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Local spatial clustering map of WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Detection ranking of driving factors for WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Detection results of driving factors for WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Detection results of driving factors for WEFC system vulnerability in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Interaction detection results of driving factors for WEFC system vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 13304 KiB  
Article
Identifying Spatiotemporal Patterns of Multiscale Connectivity in the Flow Space of Urban Agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin
by Yaohui Chen, Caihui Cui, Zhigang Han, Feng Liu, Qirui Wu and Wangqin Yu
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12(11), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12110447 - 30 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2038
Abstract
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the rise of global sustainability science have led to the increasing recognition of basins as the key natural geographical units for human–land system coupling and spatial coordinated development. The effective measurement of spatiotemporal patterns of [...] Read more.
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the rise of global sustainability science have led to the increasing recognition of basins as the key natural geographical units for human–land system coupling and spatial coordinated development. The effective measurement of spatiotemporal patterns of urban connectivity within a basin has become a key issue in achieving basin-related SDGs. Meanwhile, China has been actively working toward co-ordinated regional development through in-depth implementation of the Yellow River Basin’s ecological protection and high-quality development. Urban connectivity has been trending in urban planning, and significant progress has been made on different scales according to the flow space theory. Nevertheless, few studies have been conducted on the multiscale spatiotemporal patterns of urban agglomeration connectivity. In this study, the urban network in the Yellow River Basin was constructed using Tencent population migration data from 2015 and 2019. It was then divided into seven distinct communities to enable analysis at both the basin and community scales. Centrality, symmetry, and polycentricity indices were employed, and the multiscale spatiotemporal patterns of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin were identified using community detection, complex networks, and the migration kaleidoscope method. Community connectivity was notably concentrated at the basin scale with a centripetal pattern and spatial heterogeneity. Additionally, there was a symmetrical and co-ordinated relationship in population migration between the eastern and western regions of the basin, as well as between the internal and external parts of the basin. At the community scale, there was significant variation in the extent of central agglomeration among different communities, with few instances of similar-level, long-distance, and interregional bilateral links. The utilization of multiscale spatiotemporal patterns has the potential to enhance the comprehension of economic cooperation between various cities and urban agglomerations. This understanding can aid decision-makers in formulating sustainable development policies that foster the spatial integration of the basin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location, economic pattern, and landform zoning map of the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The methodology framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Community structure of urban networks in 2015 and 2019 in the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Community connectivity inside the basin in 2015 and 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>External connectivity of communities in the basin in 2015 and 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hierarchical relationship and functional types of cities in 2015 and 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>External connectivity of cities in the communities in 2015 and 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Urban network visualization by migration kaleidoscopes in 2015 and 2019.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 10082 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Pattern of Carbon Compensation Potential and Network Association in Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin
by Haihong Song, Yifan Li, Liyuan Gu, Jingnan Tang and Xin Zhang
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12(10), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12100435 - 23 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1871
Abstract
The Yellow River Basin is an important energy base and economic belt in China, but its water resources are scarce, its ecology is fragile, and the task of achieving the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality is arduous. Carbon compensation potential can [...] Read more.
The Yellow River Basin is an important energy base and economic belt in China, but its water resources are scarce, its ecology is fragile, and the task of achieving the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality is arduous. Carbon compensation potential can also be used to study the path to achieving carbon neutrality, which can clarify the potential of one region’s carbon sink surplus to be compensated to the other areas. Still, there needs to be more research on the carbon compensation potential of the Yellow River Basin. Therefore, this study calculated the carbon compensation potential using the β convergence test and parameter comparison method. With the help of spatial measurement tools such as GIS, GeoDa, Stata, and social network analysis methods, the spatiotemporal pattern and network structure of the carbon compensation potential in the Yellow River Basin were studied from the perspective of urban agglomeration. The results demonstrate the following: (1) The overall carbon compensation rate of the YRB showed a downward trend from 2005 to 2019, falling by 0.94, and the specific pattern was “high in the northwest and low in the southeast”. The spatial distribution is roughly spread along the east–west axis, and the distribution axis and the center of gravity keep shifting to the northwest. It also showed a weak divergence and a bifurcation trend. (2) The carbon compensation rate in the YRB passed the spatial correlation and β convergence tests, demonstrating the existence of spatial correlation and a “catch-up effect” among cities. (3) The overall distribution pattern of the carbon compensation potential in the YRB is a “low in the west and high in the east” pattern, and its value increased by 8.86% during the sampled period. (4) The network correlation of carbon compensation potential in the YRB has been significantly enhanced, with the downstream region being more connected than the upstream region. (5) The Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration has the largest network center, followed by the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration, and the Ningxia along the Yellow River Urban Agglomeration has the fewest linked conduction paths. According to the research results, accurate and efficient planning and development suggestions are proposed for urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Carbon compensation rate of the YRB urban agglomeration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of carbon compensation rate in the YRB urban agglomeration: (<b>a</b>) in 2005; (<b>b</b>) in 2009; (<b>c</b>) in 2014; (<b>d</b>) in 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evolutionary characteristics of the spatial distribution of carbon compensation rate in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Carbon compensation rate evolution characteristics with time series for urban clusters in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LISA agglomeration map of carbon compensation rate in YRB: (<b>a</b>) in 2005; (<b>b</b>) in 2009; (<b>c</b>) in 2014; (<b>d</b>) in 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Carbon compensation potential of urban agglomerations in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of carbon compensation potential of urban agglomerations in the YRB: (<b>a</b>) in 2005; (<b>b</b>) in 2009; (<b>c</b>) in 2014; (<b>d</b>) in 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Overall network linkage of carbon compensation potential of urban agglomerations in the YRB: (<b>a</b>) in 2005; (<b>b</b>) in 2009; (<b>c</b>) in 2014; (<b>d</b>) in 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Block-type results for three urban agglomerations and related index line graphs: (<b>a</b>) Shangdong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration; (<b>b</b>) Central Plains Urban Agglomeration; (<b>c</b>) Guanzhong Urban Agglomeration; (<b>d</b>) Network Density; (<b>e</b>) Network Connection; (<b>f</b>) network hierarchy; (<b>g</b>) network efficiency.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 19895 KiB  
Article
A Study on Resource Carrying Capacity and Early Warning of Urban Agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin Based on Sustainable Development Goals, China
by Xiaoyan Bu, Xiaomin Wang, Jiarui Wang and Ge Shi
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14577; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914577 - 8 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1635
Abstract
The Yellow River Basin is an essential ecological barrier in China, but it is relatively underdeveloped. The human–land relationship needs to be coordinated, and the ecological environment is fragile, which seriously restricts the sustainable development of the urban agglomeration in the Yellow River [...] Read more.
The Yellow River Basin is an essential ecological barrier in China, but it is relatively underdeveloped. The human–land relationship needs to be coordinated, and the ecological environment is fragile, which seriously restricts the sustainable development of the urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin. In this study, a “five-dimensional integrated” comprehensive carrying capacity evaluation model is constructed using the five dimensions of water, land, ecology, monitoring, and early warning to evaluate its resource carrying capacity quantitatively. It constructs an early warning system of the resource carrying capacity based on the quantitative evaluation results and monitors the state of the resource carrying capacity. The results show that (1) seven major urban agglomerations’ populations, grain productions, and land are surplus, and 50.85% of prefecture-level cities have food surpluses regarding human–food relationships. (2) There are shortages in the urban agglomeration’s water resources and a deficit in the water resource carrying capacity. (3) The average ecological carrying capacity index is 0.519, indicating a state of ecological affluence. (4) The comprehensive resource carrying capacity is defined as level-three heavy-load conditions, while 67%, 22%, and 14% of cities have level-one, -two, and -three heavy-load conditions, respectively. This study can aid in the monitoring of the resource carrying status of the Yellow River Basin. These results provide a scientific basis for effectively restraining the utilization and development of natural resources in the Yellow River Basin. It can also provide a research paradigm for the world’s river basins, as well as the sustainable development of man and nature in the world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution map of the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The theoretical framework of the “five-dimensional integration” evaluation of the resource carrying capacity with the goal of sustainable development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Land resource carrying indices (<b>a</b>) and land resource carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) in the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Land resource carrying indices (<b>a</b>) and land resource carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) for the major cities in the urban agglomeration of the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Water resources carrying indices (<b>a</b>) and water resources carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) for the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Water resources carrying indices (<b>a</b>) and water resources carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) for the major cities in the urban agglomeration of the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Ecological carrying indices (<b>a</b>) and ecological carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) in the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Ecological carrying indices (<b>a</b>) and ecological carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) for the major cities in the urban agglomeration of the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comprehensive carrying capacity indices (<b>a</b>) and comprehensive carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) for the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comprehensive carrying capacity indices (<b>a</b>) and comprehensive carrying capacities (<b>b</b>) for the major cities in the urban agglomeration of the Yellow River Basin, China.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3885 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Action Path of Environmental Governance on Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin
by Hongfeng Zhang, Miao Liu, Yixiang Wang, Xiangjiang Ding and Yueting Li
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14114; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914114 - 23 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1268
Abstract
Since the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River basin in China have become a major national strategy, reducing carbon emissions has become pivotal. Therefore, based on the relevant data of 53 cities from 2008 to 2021 in seven urban agglomerations [...] Read more.
Since the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River basin in China have become a major national strategy, reducing carbon emissions has become pivotal. Therefore, based on the relevant data of 53 cities from 2008 to 2021 in seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin, this paper explores the overall situation and spatio-temporal evolution of environmental governance and carbon emissions in the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin using the entropy method, ArcGIS, slacks-based measurement models (SBM models), etc. Additionally, this paper quantitatively analyzes the pathways by which environmental governance affects carbon emissions in the urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin. The results show that carbon emissions increased year on year from 2008 to 2021, the growth rate slowed down gradually and exhibited a downward trend, and the largest amount of carbon was emitted in 2019, at 3495 million tons. Before 2017, the growth rate of carbon emissions showed a trend of increasing year by year, with the largest increase rate being 11.17% in 2010. After that, the growth rate of carbon emissions continued to decrease and entered a stage of fluctuation. The growth rate of carbon emissions in 2020 was the lowest, reaching −5.66%. The environmental governance effect of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin exhibits a large gap; the regional difference is obvious, and the overall trend is rising. Environmental governance has a significant negative effect on carbon emissions in urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin. The cross-terms of environmental governance, the energy consumption structure, industrial structure upgrading, green technological innovation, and foreign direct investment (FDI) have significant negative impacts on carbon emissions, while the indirect impacts on urban agglomerations have shown regional heterogeneity. The goal of reducing carbon emissions in urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin is being realized gradually. Based on research conclusions, policy suggestions are put forward, hoping to provide ideas for environmental protection and high-quality development of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Environmental governance indexes of seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Carbon emissions and the carbon emissions growth rate of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Carbon emissions of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of the environmental governance intensity of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin in 2008, 2014, and 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of the environmental governance intensity of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin in 2008, 2014, and 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of carbon emissions in urban agglomerations in the Yellow River basin in 2008, 2014, and 2021.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3516 KiB  
Article
A Long-Term and Comprehensive Assessment of the Ecological Costs Arising from Urban Agglomeration Expansion in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin
by Xiaoyan Ren, Yuhao Yang and Zongming Wang
Land 2023, 12(9), 1736; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091736 - 6 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1264
Abstract
The Yellow River Basin (YRB) stands as one of China’s most significant river basins, and the maintenance of its ecological functionality is of paramount importance for national well-being. The Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration (GPUA), situated in the middle reaches of the YRB, represents [...] Read more.
The Yellow River Basin (YRB) stands as one of China’s most significant river basins, and the maintenance of its ecological functionality is of paramount importance for national well-being. The Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration (GPUA), situated in the middle reaches of the YRB, represents the central hub of human activities. The rapid expansion of cities within this region poses formidable challenges to the ecological security framework of the highly sensitive middle reaches of the YRB. In this study, the dynamic equivalent coefficient method was employed to evaluate the changes in Ecological Service Values (ESVs) within the GPUA from 1990 to 2020, as well as the ecological costs incurred due to urban expansion. The results indicate the following: (1) Over the past three decades, the land-use pattern within the GPUA has undergone significant transformations. The area designated for urban development has expanded by a factor of 1.16 compared to its original extent, while the areas encompassing forests, shrubs, agricultural land, grassland, wetland, and bare land have experienced continuous reductions. (2) The ESV of the study area displays a declining trend initially, followed by a subsequent increase over the 30-year period. Forests play a predominant role in contributing to the ESV of the GPUA, with regulating services and supporting services standing out as the primary ecosystem functions. (3) The expansion of the GPUA between 1990 and 2020 has resulted in a net loss of 3772.10 km2 of ecological land. The ecological costs associated with urban expansion soar to an astonishing CNY 2.54 billion, with the highest costs attributed to the loss of hydrological regulation and soil conservation services; this issue demands significant attention. The outcomes of this research contribute to a better comprehension of the ecological costs and benefits that accompany the development of urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the YRB. Furthermore, they provide invaluable insights for decision makers seeking to implement more effective strategies for sustainable land-use management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Landscape Ecological Planning and Its Environmental Effects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overall geographic characteristics of the YRB and location of the GPUA with land cover characteristics in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial pattern of land cover in the GPUA from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Results of the sensitivity analysis for <span class="html-italic">ESV</span> estimation of different land types. (<b>b</b>) The composition and changes in the four major <span class="html-italic">ESVs</span> in the GPUA from 1990 to 2020. (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">ESV</span> changes in six ecological land types from 1990 to 2020. (<b>d</b>) Changes in the contribution rates of six ecological land types to the four <span class="html-italic">ESVs</span> from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of <span class="html-italic">ESV</span> per unit area and the composition of four types of ecosystem service values in cities of the GPUA from 1990 to 2000.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal characteristics of ecological land occupation via GPUA expansion from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Loss of various types of ecological land in GPUA from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Overall changes in four types of ecological cost losses in the study area in three stages. (<b>b</b>) Detailed ecosystem service loss costs caused by the expansion of the GPUA. (<b>c</b>) Costs of ecosystem service loss due to the loss of various types of ecological land occupied by urban expansion from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Loss of ecological land area due to urban sprawl in each of the three phases. (<b>b</b>) Ecological costs induced by urban expansion in each of the three stages. (<b>c</b>) Spatial and temporal changes in the ecological costs of each urban expansion in the GPUA from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3575 KiB  
Article
Temporal–Spatial Variations and Convergence Analysis of Land Use Eco-Efficiency in the Urban Agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin in China
by Fanchao Kong, Kaixiao Zhang, Hengshu Fu, Lina Cui, Yang Li and Tengteng Wang
Sustainability 2023, 15(16), 12182; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612182 - 9 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1197
Abstract
Achieving synergistic development of efficient urban land use and the natural environment is crucial in promoting green urbanization. The assessment of land use eco-efficiency (LUEE) and its temporal–spatial changes provides an effective means of quantifying the relationship between the urban ecological environment and [...] Read more.
Achieving synergistic development of efficient urban land use and the natural environment is crucial in promoting green urbanization. The assessment of land use eco-efficiency (LUEE) and its temporal–spatial changes provides an effective means of quantifying the relationship between the urban ecological environment and land use. Targeting 55 selected cities in the Yellow River Basin (YRB), in this study, we utilize the Super-EBM method to gauge the LUEE. We explore the temporal patterns and the spatial convergence of LUEE utilizing kernel density estimation and spatial econometric methods. Considering the resource and environmental costs of land use, we assumed the industrial pollutant emissions generated during urban land use as the undesired outputs and designed a framework for measuring the level of LUEE under double constraints, which theoretically revealed the formation process and spatial convergence mechanism of LUEE. The results show the following: (1) Throughout the sample period, the LUEE of the YRB urban agglomeration decreased from 0.158 in 2009 to 0.094 in 2020, indicating a decreasing spatial disparity in LUEE over time. Notably, the Lanxi urban cluster exhibited the largest gap in LUEE, whereas the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration displayed the smallest gap. The hyper-variable density exceeded the inter-group gap as the main factor leading to the difference in LUEE. (2) Although the LUEE of urban agglomerations has increased, there still exists a noticeable polarization phenomenon. (3) The LUEE of YRB demonstrates a pattern of conditional convergence and exerts a significant spatial spillover effect. Over time, the LUEE of YRB will tend towards an individual steady state. The findings have implications for strengthening linkage and synergy among cities in YRB, promoting factor integration across administrative regions, and formulating heterogeneous policies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The formation process of land use eco-efficiency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The location distribution of five urban agglomerations in the YRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Kernel density curves for urban agglomerations. (<b>a</b>) The Yellow River Basin, (<b>b</b>) Central Plains, (<b>c</b>) Lanxi, (<b>d</b>) Guanzhong Plain, (<b>e</b>) Shandong Peninsula, (<b>f</b>) Hubao–Egyu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Kernel density curves for urban agglomerations. (<b>a</b>) The Yellow River Basin, (<b>b</b>) Central Plains, (<b>c</b>) Lanxi, (<b>d</b>) Guanzhong Plain, (<b>e</b>) Shandong Peninsula, (<b>f</b>) Hubao–Egyu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><span class="html-italic">σ</span>-convergence trends of land use eco-efficiency.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop