[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (21)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = RepRap

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 19098 KiB  
Review
Patent Parasites: Non-Inventors Patenting Existing Open-Source Inventions in the 3-D Printing Technology Space
by Apoorv Kulkarni and Joshua M. Pearce
Inventions 2023, 8(6), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8060141 - 6 Nov 2023
Viewed by 7052
Abstract
Open-source 3-D printing has played a pivotal role in revolutionizing the additive manufacturing (AM) landscape by making distributed manufacturing economic, democratizing access, and fostering far more rapid innovation than antiquated proprietary systems. Unfortunately, some 3-D printing manufacturing companies began deviating from open-source principles [...] Read more.
Open-source 3-D printing has played a pivotal role in revolutionizing the additive manufacturing (AM) landscape by making distributed manufacturing economic, democratizing access, and fostering far more rapid innovation than antiquated proprietary systems. Unfortunately, some 3-D printing manufacturing companies began deviating from open-source principles and violating licenses for the detriment of the community. To determine if a pattern has emerged of companies patenting clearly open-source innovations, this study presents three case studies from the three primary regions of open-source 3-D printing development (EU, U.S., and China) as well as three aspects of 3-D printing technology (AM materials, an open-source 3-D printer, and core open-source 3-D printing concepts used in most 3-D printers). The results of this review have shown that non-inventing entities, called patent parasites, are patenting open-source inventions already well-established in the open-source community and, in the most egregious cases, commercialized by one (or several) firm(s) at the time of the patent filing. Patent parasites are able to patent open-source innovations by using a different language, vague patent titles, and broad claims that encompass enormous swaths of widely diffused open-source innovation space. This practice poses a severe threat to innovation, and several approaches to irradicate the threat are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Innovation Papers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hangprinter in operation printing a Babel tower. Reprinted under Gnu Free Documentation License by Torbjørns from Ref. [<a href="#B83-inventions-08-00141" class="html-bibr">83</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The open-source hangprinter being used to construct a multi-story building model. Reprinted under Gnu Free Documentation License by Torbjørns from Ref. [<a href="#B83-inventions-08-00141" class="html-bibr">83</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The schematic shows a circular structure with outer walls being 3-D printed by a cable-driven parallel robot with four cable directions including one near vertical one. This is an actual figure from the patent in question [<a href="#B66-inventions-08-00141" class="html-bibr">66</a>], which could possibly be the start of a Babel tower, which would make even the example use case unoriginal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of adaptive layer slicing [<a href="#B88-inventions-08-00141" class="html-bibr">88</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variable layer height settings in PrusaSlicer, a free and open-source slicing software.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic of the multi-height slicing patent shown in B area [<a href="#B69-inventions-08-00141" class="html-bibr">69</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>MMU2.0 material selector installed on a Prusa i3 MKS3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>MMU2.0 upgrade material feeding system attached to Prusa i3 MK3S.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic of the multi-material system patent [<a href="#B70-inventions-08-00141" class="html-bibr">70</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Lulzbot nozzle wiping/cleaning system.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3351 KiB  
Article
Overcoming Chip Shortages: Low-Cost Open-Source Parametric 3-D Printable Solderless SOIC to DIP Breakout Adapters
by Cameron K. Brooks, Jack E. Peplinski and Joshua M. Pearce
Inventions 2023, 8(2), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8020061 - 10 Apr 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3268
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerability of global supply chains of many products. One area that requires improved supply chain resilience and that is of particular importance to electronic designers is the shortage of basic dual in-line package (DIP) electronic components commonly used [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerability of global supply chains of many products. One area that requires improved supply chain resilience and that is of particular importance to electronic designers is the shortage of basic dual in-line package (DIP) electronic components commonly used for prototyping. This anecdotal observation was investigated as a case study of using additive manufacturing to enforce contact between premade, off-the-shelf conductors to allow for electrical continuity between two arbitrary points by examining data relating to the stock quantity of electronic components, extracted from Digi-Key Electronics. This study applies this concept using an open hardware approach for the design, testing, and use of a simple, parametric, 3-D printable invention that allows for small outline integrated circuit (SOIC) components to be used in DIP package circuits (i.e., breadboards, protoboards, etc.). The additive manufacture breakout board (AMBB) design was developed using two different open-source modelers, OpenSCAD and FreeCAD, to provide reliable and consistent electrical contact between the component and the rest of the circuit and was demonstrated with reusable 8-SOIC to DIP breakout adapters. The three-part design was optimized for manufacturing with RepRap-class fused filament 3-D printers, making the AMBB a prime candidate for use in distributed manufacturing models. The AMBB offers increased flexibility during circuit prototyping by allowing arbitrary connections between the component and prototyping interface as well as superior organization through the ability to color-code different component types. The cost of the AMBB is CAD $0.066/unit, which is a 94% saving compared to conventional PCB-based breakout boards. Use of the AMBB device can provide electronics designers with an increased selection of components for through-hole use by more than a factor of seven. Future development of AMBB devices to allow for low-cost conversion between arbitrary package types provides a path towards more accessible and inclusive electronics design as well as faster prototyping and technical innovation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in 3D Printing 3.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>FreeCAD view of the enclosure (<b>left</b>), component housing (<b>center</b>), and securing bolt (<b>right</b>); (<b>a</b>) top view; (<b>b</b>) rear view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Test circuit schematic for an inverting amplifier with a nominal 3.3 V input signal and supplied with nominal 9 V batteries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Quantity of surface-mount versus through-hole components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Number of surface-mount versus through-hole component product offerings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Number of surface mount versus through-hole components in stock product offerings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Constructed inverting amplifier circuit. (<b>b</b>) Close view of design used on a breadboard. This is a direct implementation of <a href="#inventions-08-00061-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>, where 9 V are the batteries, the black AMBB contains an 8-SOIC op amp, and the 3.3 V is supplied using an Arduino UNO r3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Orthographic view of the assembled CAD for the device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Partially assembled CAD for the device with a semi-translucent enclosure part.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Geometric limitation of the AMBB approach.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 16400 KiB  
Article
Fused Deposition Modeling with Induced Vibrations: A Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Printed Parts
by Joseph Dei Rossi, Ozgur Keles and Vimal Viswanathan
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(18), 9327; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189327 - 17 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1972
Abstract
The recent development of RepRap style 3D printers has made additive manufacturing technology available to the public at a low cost. While these 3D printers are being used for a variety of purposes, one of the main applications is prototyping in design projects. [...] Read more.
The recent development of RepRap style 3D printers has made additive manufacturing technology available to the public at a low cost. While these 3D printers are being used for a variety of purposes, one of the main applications is prototyping in design projects. The quality of the 3D-printed parts has been a concern in such cases. Many variables within these printers’ operation can be varied to obtain optimum print quality. This study explores a setup that uses externally induced mechanical vibrations to the nozzle tip as a potential method to improve the quality of 3D-printed parts. Induced vibration is expected to decrease the porosity of printed parts and enhance the cohesion between print beads, ultimately improving their mechanical properties. The objective is to understand the prints’ positional accuracy, porosity, and mechanical properties with the added vibration and then to determine the optimum vibration level to achieve the best quality prints. While previous studies have explored the role of induced vibration on the mechanical properties of printed parts, the novelty of this work lies in the determination of the positional accuracy of those parts and the determination of optimum vibration levels to achieve desired properties. For positional accuracy, the extruder filament is replaced with a pointed-tip pen that can mark the exact location where the printer delivers the material. A comparison between the locations marked by the pen with and without vibrations shows that the errors induced by the added vibration are not significantly different from those caused by the uncertainties of the printer itself. Based on the tensile tests of the printed specimens, it is concluded that the parts printed with induced vibrations have improved mechanical properties. The printed parts’ porosity is reduced significantly due to the induced vibrations. Further, this study also explores the optimum motor speeds to achieve a uniform distribution of material. It determines medium motor speeds that provide a maximum vibration amplitude, which is more desirable for a consistent infill. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Trends on the Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufacturing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Folger Tech FT-5 R2 printer was used for the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Vibration and pen mounts as attached to the cartridge of the printer; (<b>b</b>) the schematic diagram for the motor connection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The adapter used for attaching the pen to the cartridge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Material distribution within the 3D-printed samples with and without induced vibrations—both images are taken at the same magnification and the scale is as shown. For the samples shown, the pore sizes are measured at 0.6 mm for the sample without vibration and 0.25 mm for the one with vibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sample vibration and offset non-vibration dots printed as observed through the microscope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Error in position induced by vibration. The standard error is too small to show in the figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Weibull plots for the errors observed in the two experimental conditions: x-direction (<b>above</b>) and y-direction (<b>below</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation in the infill of the printed parts with increasing print speeds for different standard raster angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Lines made with the pen-attachment in the y-direction with increasing amplitudes of induced vibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>3D-printed lines in the y-direction with increasing amplitudes of induced vibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Variation in the amplitude and wavelength of vibrations with varying motor speeds. Error bars represent (±) 1 S.E.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>A line was drawn at S26, before and after the collapse, likely due to the pen rubbing on the paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Lines drawn at different motor speeds as viewed through the microscope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Stress–strain curve for lower right region of print bed, with 3600 mm/min print speed and 205 °C extrusion temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Porosity of specimens with and without induced vibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Microscopic images of the cross-sections at the break.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Stress–strain curve for 0.35 mm print layer thickness with varying levels of vibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Cross-sections of the specimens at the fracture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Porosity at various levels of induced vibration. All error bars show (±1) S.E.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>SEM images of samples at varying levels of vibration.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6137 KiB  
Article
Influence of Extruder’s Nozzle Diameter on the Improvement of Functional Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Products
by Piotr Czyżewski, Dawid Marciniak, Bartosz Nowinka, Michał Borowiak and Marek Bieliński
Polymers 2022, 14(2), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020356 - 17 Jan 2022
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 4194
Abstract
The dynamic growth of the use of polymer construction parts manufactured individually and in a small series makes it necessary to improve additive methods in the areas of materials, equipment and processes. By observing selected phenomena occurring during the processing of polymer materials [...] Read more.
The dynamic growth of the use of polymer construction parts manufactured individually and in a small series makes it necessary to improve additive methods in the areas of materials, equipment and processes. By observing selected phenomena occurring during the processing of polymer materials in other production technologies (e.g., extrusion and injection molding), it is possible to obtain solutions that positively affect the final performance properties of the products obtained in additive manufacturing technologies using thermoplastic filament. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of the diameter of the print head nozzle on the spatial structure (path width) and selected mechanical properties of samples produced by the FFF method with PLA material. The obtained results were compared to the samples with a solid structure produced using injection molding technology. In the experiment, the RepRap device for additive manufacturing was used, with the use of nozzles with diameters of 0.2 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.8 mm and 1.2 mm. The test objects were produced with a layer height of 0.2 mm, full filling (100%) and with constant remaining printing parameters. The conducted research allowed us to conclude that the use of layer heights lower than the standard ones gives favorable results for selected mechanical properties. The use of an extruder nozzle diameter of 0.8 mm allows one to obtain a macrostructure with a high degree of interconnection of layers and paths and favorable mechanical properties. The test results can be used in the construction of functional elements that are produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) and fused filament fabrication (FFF) methods in prototype, unit and small-lot production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymers in Additive Manufacturing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Test specimens used in the tests in accordance with the standards (dimension in mm): (<b>a</b>) static tensile strength (ISO 527), (<b>b</b>) Charpy impact strength (ISO 179), (<b>c</b>) impact tensile strength (ISO 8256), (<b>d</b>) filament sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geometry and basic dimensions of the print head nozzle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Influence of the diameter of the head nozzle on the overlapping of paths in individual layers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The arrangement of PLA paths in printed samples depending on the dimensions of the nozzle diameter used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Filling structure of injection molding and 3D-printed samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Research objects placed on testing stands: (<b>a</b>) filament, (<b>b</b>) dog-bone specimen, (<b>c</b>) impact tensile strength specimen, (<b>d</b>) Charpy impact test specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Microscope images of the outer layer of tested specimens with example path width measured: (<b>a</b>) 0.2 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>b</b>) 0.4 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>c</b>) 0.8 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>d</b>) 1.2 mm diameter nozzle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Microscope images of fracture of tested specimens with example layer thickness measured: (<b>a</b>) 0.2 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>b</b>) 0.4 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>c</b>) 0.8 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>d</b>) 1.2 mm diameter nozzle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Microscope images of the outer layer of tested specimens with example path gap measured: (<b>a</b>) 0.8 mm diameter nozzle, (<b>b</b>) 1.2 mm diameter nozzle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Average apparent density with standard deviation for samples produced with different nozzle diameters. IM—average value obtained for injected samples. Filament—average value for the filament before printing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Average impact strength values with standard deviation for specimens produced with different nozzle diameters. IM—average value obtained for injected specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Average impact tensile strength values with standard deviation for specimens produced with different nozzle diameters. IM—average value obtained for injected specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Average tensile strength values with standard deviation for samples produced with different nozzle diameters. IM—average value obtained for injected specimens. Filament—average value measured for single 1.75 mm filament fiber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Selected example stress–strain curves recorded during static tensile tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of mechanical properties of samples with a solid structure (injection molding) and 3D-printed samples. A—Young’s modulus; B—tensile strength; C—elongation; D—impact strength; E—impact tensile strength; F—apparent density; G—specific modulus; H—specific tensile strength.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 16170 KiB  
Article
Open-Source Grinding Machine for Compression Screw Manufacturing
by Jacob Franz and Joshua M. Pearce
Inventions 2020, 5(3), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5030026 - 3 Jul 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 16330
Abstract
Some of the most promising distributed recycling and additive manufacturing (DRAM) technical systems use fused particle fabrication (FPF) or fused granular fabrication (FGF), where compression screws force post-consumer waste plastic through a heated nozzle for direct 3D printing. To assist the technical evolution [...] Read more.
Some of the most promising distributed recycling and additive manufacturing (DRAM) technical systems use fused particle fabrication (FPF) or fused granular fabrication (FGF), where compression screws force post-consumer waste plastic through a heated nozzle for direct 3D printing. To assist the technical evolution of these systems, this study provided the details of an invention for a low-cost, easily replicable open-source grinding machine for compression screw manufacturing. The system itself can be largely fabricated using FPF/FGF following the self-replicating rapid prototyper (RepRap) methodology. This grinding machine can be made from a cordless cut-off grinder and < $155 in parts. The new invention is demonstrated to be able to cut custom screws with variable (i) channel depths, (ii) screw diameters, (iii) screw lengths, (iv) pitches, (v) abrasive disk thicknesses, (vi) handedness of the screws, (vii) and materials (three types of steel tested: 1045 steel, 1144 steel, and 416 stainless steel). The results show that the device is more than capable of replicating commercial screws as well as providing makers with a much greater flexibility to make custom screws. This invention enables the DRAM toolchain to become even more self-sufficient, which assists the goals of the circular economy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Grinding Technology and Systems 2019)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) CAD with dimensions of plywood frame and (<b>b</b>) image of completely assembled frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) CAD with dimensions of plywood frame and (<b>b</b>) image of completely assembled frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis and <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis sliders with all the bearings, bolts, and locknuts; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis and <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis sliders with bearings installed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Threaded rod tension slide installed onto the chuck end of the plywood frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Threaded rod tension slide installed onto the chuck end of the plywood frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Image of the purchased micro compression screw with virgin PLA pellets that would typically be used for fused particle fabrication or filament manufacturing. Take note that the channel depth is significantly smaller than the diameter of the pellets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The fully assembled compression screw manufacturing machine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The top screw is the original purchased screw with a channel depth of 1.6 mm. The bottom screw was manufactured with the machine detailed in this report and has a channel depth of 2.5 mm. Both screws have an outer diameter of 8 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>This screw was manufactured with a 10 mm diameter and a channel depth of 3.8 mm. Virgin PLA pellets fit nicely with these screw dimensions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison between the purchased screw (top) and a machined screw with an extended length (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of two screws with a 10 mm diameter and different pitches. The top and bottom screws were manufactured using a 10 and 11.4 mm pitch, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison between a screw using a 3175 mm thick abrasive disk (top) and a 6.35 mm thick abrasive disk (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of a right-hand threaded screw (top) and a left-hand threaded screw (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>An example of two screws manufactured from 416 stainless steel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of a disk after 10 screws (bottom) and an unused disk (top).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Compression screw ground using a worn-down abrasive disk. (<b>b</b>) Compression screw with a finishing pass using a new abrasive disk.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Screw CAD with dimensions.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 39231 KiB  
Article
Open-Source Digitally Replicable Lab-Grade Scales
by Benjamin R. Hubbard and Joshua M. Pearce
Instruments 2020, 4(3), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments4030018 - 27 Jun 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 8869
Abstract
This study provides designs for a low-cost, easily replicable open-source lab-grade digital scale that can be used as a precision balance. The design is such that it can be manufactured for use in most labs throughout the world with open-source RepRap-class material extrusion-based [...] Read more.
This study provides designs for a low-cost, easily replicable open-source lab-grade digital scale that can be used as a precision balance. The design is such that it can be manufactured for use in most labs throughout the world with open-source RepRap-class material extrusion-based 3-D printers for the mechanical components and readily available open-source electronics including the Arduino Nano. Several versions of the design were fabricated and tested for precision and accuracy for a range of load cells. The results showed the open-source scale was found to be repeatable within 0.05 g with multiple load cells, with even better precision (0.005 g) depending on load cell range and style. The scale tracks linearly with proprietary lab-grade scales, meeting the performance specified in the load cell data sheets, indicating that it is accurate across the range of the load cell installed. The smallest load cell tested (100 g) offers precision on the order of a commercial digital mass balance. The scale can be produced at significant cost savings compared to scales of comparable range and precision when serial capability is present. The cost savings increase significantly as the range of the scale increases and are particularly well-suited for resource-constrained medical and scientific facilities. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Electrical circuit breadboard layout. Please note that all components connected to and including the LCD are optional.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Electrical circuit wiring diagram. Pinouts on the Arduino were selected to reduce the number of required jumper wires when using an Arduino Nano. Pinout selection can be modified in the firmware header file, Pinouts.hpp. Changing micro-controllers or pinouts may change the header pin requirements relative to the listing in <a href="#instruments-04-00018-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The circuit was assembled on a solder circuit board using jumper wires and header pins. The female header pins connect to the Arduino Nano and the HX711. The male header pins connect to the load cell and the LCD. The tare push-button is attached via twisted pair to allow installation on the face of the scale. (<b>a</b>) The soldered components were arranged in such a way to minimize wire use and to properly place the Arduino when installed in the base. (<b>b</b>) Shows the final circuit board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Key features of the base include standoffs to mount the load cell, locators for the screen and circuit board, and a slot for access to the Arduino Nano’s USB port. The base also has a snap-seam to attach the cover to the base, enclosing the internal components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The circuit board fits into the bosses on the right side of the base to hold it in place. The twisted pair was fed through the hole for the push-button and a set of female–male jumper wires were connected to the load cell header pins to reach the TAL221 wires.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The LCD is held in place by two locators behind the slot for the screen. Its wires are tucked under a plastic wire manager attached to the TAL220 boss, then connected to the circuit board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) The TAL221 load cell should be installed with the wires leading off the end of the load cell attached to the base—the M5 tapped holes. Please note that the button is also installed. (<b>b</b>) After snapping on the lid, the bed can be attached to the free end of the load cell using two M4 bolts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) The cover must be sandwiched between the load cell and the bed prior to attaching to the base. Note the direction the load cell is aimed so it will rest on the TAL221 boss when the cover is snapped on. (<b>b</b>) After connecting the load cell to the controller, the cover is snapped on and the TAL221 is screwed to the base using two M3 bolts. This must be done by feel, but does not take very long.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The scale returns a readout similar to the one shown during initialization. The readout indicates the action in progress, success, and returns the sensitivity value when reading from memory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The 5kg load cell results are shown (<b>a</b>) The standard deviation (sample of 5 measurements) averaged to 0.0163 g. This is large relative to the APX402 and the A-160; (<b>b</b>) The absolute value of the difference between each scale and the A-160 is shown. The open-source scale averaged a difference of 0.0363 g.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The 500 g load cell test results are shown. (<b>a</b>) The standard deviation (sample of 5 measurements) averaged to 0.0207 g for the open-source scale. This is large relative to the lab-grade scales; (<b>b</b>) The absolute value of the difference between the average measurements by the A-160 and the other two scales are shown. The open-source scale average measurement was within 0.0142 g of the A-160, on average.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The 100 g load cell test results are shown. (<b>a</b>) The standard deviation (sample of 5 measurements) averaged to 0.005 g for the open-source scale. This is close to that of the lab-grade scales (on the same order as the APX402); (<b>b</b>) The absolute value of the difference between the average measurements by the 500 g TAL221 and the other two scales are shown. The 100 g TAL221 average measurement was within 0.0198 g of the 500 g TAL221, on average.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The standard mass test results are shown. (<b>a</b>) The standard deviation (sample of at least 48 measurements) increased with the range of the load cell; there is little difference between the PLA housing and wood frame. (<b>b</b>) The absolute value of the difference between the average measurements of each scale and the nominal mass of the weights is shown. The accuracy range for the weights is indicated by a red line.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 60008 KiB  
Article
The Examination of Restrained Joints Created in the Process of Multi-Material FFF Additive Manufacturing Technology
by Janusz Kluczyński, Lucjan Śnieżek, Alexander Kravcov, Krzysztof Grzelak, Pavel Svoboda, Ireneusz Szachogłuchowicz, Ondřej Franek, Nikolaj Morozov, Janusz Torzewski and Petr Kubeček
Materials 2020, 13(4), 903; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040903 - 18 Feb 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 4275
Abstract
The paper is focused on the examination of the internal quality of joints created in a multi-material additive manufacturing process. The main part of the work focuses on experimental production and non-destructive testing of restrained joints of modified PLA (polylactic acid) and ABS [...] Read more.
The paper is focused on the examination of the internal quality of joints created in a multi-material additive manufacturing process. The main part of the work focuses on experimental production and non-destructive testing of restrained joints of modified PLA (polylactic acid) and ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) three-dimensional (3D)-printed on RepRap 3D device that works on the “open source” principle. The article presents the outcomes of a non-destructive materials test in the form of the data from the Laser Amplified Ultrasonography, microscopic observations of the joints area and tensile tests of the specially designed samples. The samples with designed joints were additively manufactured of two materials: Specially blended PLA (Market name—PLA Tough) and conventionally made ABS. The tests are mainly focused on the determination of the quality of material connection in the joints area. Based on the results obtained, the samples made of two materials were compared in the end to establish which produced material joint is stronger and have a lower amount of defects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Materials Investigations in Mechanical Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The FFF additive technology process scheme [<a href="#B25-materials-13-00903" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Layer deposition with different raster angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Designed samples: 1—the monolithic reference sample; 2—the overlap connection, 3—the pleated connection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The joint manufacturing procedure for each layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Additively manufactured samples: 1—Monolithic, PLA (PT); 2—Pleated connection, PLA (PTZ); 3—Overlap connection, PLA (PTN); 4—Monolithic, ABS (ABS); 5—Pleated connection, ABS (ABSZ); 6—Overlap connection, ABS (ABSN), 7—Overlap connection, PLA/ABS(PTABSZ); 8—Pleated connection, PLA/ABS (PTABSN).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Illustration of the research methodology employed in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram of optoacoustic generator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The internal structure of samples; (<b>a</b>) Pleated connection, PLA Though™, and ABS; (<b>b</b>) Overlap connection, PLA Though™, and ABS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Three-dimensional (3D) model of samples with defective areas designation; (<b>a</b>) pleated connection, PLA Though™, and ABS; (<b>b</b>) overlap connection, PLA Though™, and ABS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Imperfections (black areas) at the end of the wavy borderline of the joint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of stress-strain curves for all types of specimens tested.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Fracture images for ABS (<b>a</b>) and PLA Tough™ (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Fracture images of a pleated joint of PLA-ABS materials.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Fracture images of overlap joint of PLA-ABS materials.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 10103 KiB  
Article
Open Source Completely 3-D Printable Centrifuge
by Salil S. Sule, Aliaksei L. Petsiuk and Joshua M. Pearce
Instruments 2019, 3(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments3020030 - 18 May 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 11047
Abstract
Centrifuges are commonly required devices in medical diagnostics facilities as well as scientific laboratories. Although there are commercial and open source centrifuges, the costs of the former and the required electricity to operate the latter limit accessibility in resource-constrained settings. There is a [...] Read more.
Centrifuges are commonly required devices in medical diagnostics facilities as well as scientific laboratories. Although there are commercial and open source centrifuges, the costs of the former and the required electricity to operate the latter limit accessibility in resource-constrained settings. There is a need for low-cost, human-powered, verified, and reliable lab-scale centrifuges. This study provides the designs for a low-cost 100% 3-D printed centrifuge, which can be fabricated on any low-cost RepRap-class (self-replicating rapid prototyper) fused filament fabrication (FFF)- or fused particle fabrication (FPF)-based 3-D printer. In addition, validation procedures are provided using a web camera and free and open source software. This paper provides the complete open source plans, including instructions for the fabrication and operation of a hand-powered centrifuge. This study successfully tested and validated the instrument, which can be operated anywhere in the world with no electricity inputs, obtaining a radial velocity of over 1750 rpm and over 50 N of relative centrifugal force. Using commercial filament, the instrument costs about U.S. $25, which is less than half of all commercially available systems. However, the costs can be dropped further using recycled plastics on open source systems for over 99% savings. The results are discussed in the context of resource-constrained medical and scientific facilities. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Schematic of gear design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Assembling Parts B and C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Inserting Part E into Part B and (<b>b</b>) inserting Part D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Attaching Part H and (<b>b</b>) Part E.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Inserting part M and (<b>b</b>) assembling Parts K and (<b>c</b>) L.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Attaching handle N, and the (<b>b</b>) grip and (<b>c</b>) lock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Assembling (<b>a</b>) Part G, (<b>b</b>) Part I, and (<b>c</b>) Part J.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Image-based markers segmentation. (<b>a</b>) Cropped frame of the centrifuge with the visual markers; (<b>b</b>) masked image; (<b>c</b>) calculated handle orientation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A screenshot of the open source biomedical centrifuge interface for camera-based rpm and relative centrifugal force calculations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fully assembled open source centrifuge in a pre-spin state.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Complete system with filled test tubes during rotation and (<b>b</b>) a screen capture of a centrifuge cam used for the graphical user interface (GUI). Tracking of the handle marker, time, angle, number of revolutions, rpm, and RCF are all shown in real time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relative centrifugal force as a function of the rotational velocity of the centrifuge test tubes with a length of 100 mm and a total radius of rotation <span class="html-italic">D</span> = 150 mm (Equation (7)).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5306 KiB  
Article
Design of a Scaffold Parameter Selection System with Additive Manufacturing for a Biomedical Cell Culture
by Marc Rabionet, Emma Polonio, Antonio J. Guerra, Jessica Martin, Teresa Puig and Joaquim Ciurana
Materials 2018, 11(8), 1427; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081427 - 14 Aug 2018
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4889
Abstract
Open-source 3D printers mean objects can be quickly and efficiently produced. However, design and fabrication parameters need to be optimized to set up the correct printing procedure; a procedure in which the characteristics of the printing materials selected for use can also influence [...] Read more.
Open-source 3D printers mean objects can be quickly and efficiently produced. However, design and fabrication parameters need to be optimized to set up the correct printing procedure; a procedure in which the characteristics of the printing materials selected for use can also influence the process. This work focuses on optimizing the printing process of the open-source 3D extruder machine RepRap, which is used to manufacture poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds for cell culture applications. PCL is a biocompatible polymer that is free of toxic dye and has been used to fabricate scaffolds, i.e., solid structures suitable for 3D cancer cell cultures. Scaffold cell culture has been described as enhancing cancer stem cell (CSC) populations related to tumor chemoresistance and/or their recurrence after chemotherapy. A RepRap BCN3D+ printer and 3 mm PCL wire were used to fabricate circular scaffolds. Design and fabrication parameters were first determined with SolidWorks and Slic3r software and subsequently optimized following a novel sequential flowchart. In the flowchart described here, the parameters were gradually optimized step by step, by taking several measurable variables of the resulting scaffolds into consideration to guarantee high-quality printing. Three deposition angles (45°, 60° and 90°) were fabricated and tested. MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells and NIH/3T3 murine fibroblasts were used to assess scaffold adequacy for 3D cell cultures. The 60° scaffolds were found to be suitable for the purpose. Therefore, PCL scaffolds fabricated via the flowchart optimization with a RepRap 3D printer could be used for 3D cell cultures and may boost CSCs to study new therapeutic treatments for this malignant population. Moreover, the flowchart defined here could represent a standard procedure for non-engineers (i.e., mainly physicians) when manufacturing new culture systems is required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Issue of the Manufacturing Engineering Society (MES))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Poly(ε-caprolactone) chemical structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>RepRap BCN 3D+ printer with a 3 mm PCL wire.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of process parameter optimization. Every parameter consists of the values tested and, on the right, the corresponding measurable variable for new cell cultures. Fabrication parameters are in the left column and design parameters in the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distances between two contiguous filaments. Axis (0.7 mm) and outer distance (0.4 mm) are represented. Filament diameter was fixed at 0.3 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Optical microscope images of MCF-7 cells seeded on the scaffolds. In 90° scaffolds, cells were attached at the bottom of the well (<b>A</b>). In 45° and 60° scaffolds, cells were attached both on the scaffold and at the well (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>, respectively). (<b>D</b>) MCF-7 cells in 2D culture. White arrows on the images indicate cells adhered to PCL filaments. Scale bars represent 100 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optical microscope images of NIH/3T3 cells seeded on the scaffolds. Cells were attached on scaffolds of 90° (<b>A</b>), 60° (<b>B</b>), and 45° (<b>C</b>). (<b>D</b>) NIH/3T3 cells in a 2D culture. White arrows on the images indicate cells adhered to PCL filaments. Scale bars represent 100 µm.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1174 KiB  
Article
Inexpensive Piezoelectric Elements for Nozzle Contact Detection and Build Platform Leveling in FFF 3D Printers
by Michael Simpson and Simon Khoury
Inventions 2018, 3(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions3010008 - 25 Jan 2018
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 15629
Abstract
Inexpensive piezoelectric diaphragms can be used as sensors to facilitate both nozzle height setting and build platform leveling in Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) 3D printers. Tests simulating nozzle contact are conducted to establish the available output and an output of greater than 8 [...] Read more.
Inexpensive piezoelectric diaphragms can be used as sensors to facilitate both nozzle height setting and build platform leveling in Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) 3D printers. Tests simulating nozzle contact are conducted to establish the available output and an output of greater than 8 Volts found at 20 °C, a value which is readily detectable by simple electronic circuits. Tests are also conducted at a temperature of 80 °C and, despite a reduction of greater than 80% in output voltage, this is still detectable. The reliability of piezoelectric diaphragms is investigated by mechanically stressing samples over 100,000 cycles at both 20 and 80 °C, and little loss of output over the test duration is found. The development of a nozzle contact sensor using a single piezoelectric diaphragm is described. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in 3-D Printing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A selection of piezoelectric diaphragms, from left to right—35 mm diameter, 27 mm with drilled hole, 20 mm diameter salvaged unit from greeting card on top, Murata unit below, 12 mm salvaged unit on right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Test equipment for obtaining response data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Test equipment for obtaining temperature response and ageing data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Z travel 1 mm per second with pre-travel and after-travel. Vertical 2 V per cm, Horizontal 50 ms per cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cycling 1 mm per second with increasing travel. Vertical 5 V per cm, Horizontal 1 s per cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cycling 2 mm per second with increasing force. Vertical 1 V per cm, Horizontal 1 s per cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Peak amplitude after 1 h (642 cycles) and after 100,000 cycles. Vertical 10 V per cm, Horizontal 50 ms per cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Change of peak amplitude with temperature and number of pressure cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effect of temperature on peak response before and after 50,000 pressure cycles at 80 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Piezo Z Probe.</p>
Full article ">
2361 KiB  
Article
General Design Procedure for Free and Open-Source Hardware for Scientific Equipment
by Shane Oberloier and Joshua M. Pearce
Designs 2018, 2(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/designs2010002 - 30 Dec 2017
Cited by 76 | Viewed by 14533
Abstract
Distributed digital manufacturing of free and open-source scientific hardware (FOSH) used for scientific experiments has been shown to in general reduce the costs of scientific hardware by 90–99%. In part due to these cost savings, the manufacturing of scientific equipment is beginning to [...] Read more.
Distributed digital manufacturing of free and open-source scientific hardware (FOSH) used for scientific experiments has been shown to in general reduce the costs of scientific hardware by 90–99%. In part due to these cost savings, the manufacturing of scientific equipment is beginning to move away from a central paradigm of purchasing proprietary equipment to one in which scientists themselves download open-source designs, fabricate components with digital manufacturing technology, and then assemble the equipment themselves. This trend introduces a need for new formal design procedures that designers can follow when targeting this scientific audience. This study provides five steps in the procedure, encompassing six design principles for the development of free and open-source hardware for scientific applications. A case study is provided for an open-source slide dryer that can be easily fabricated for under $20, which is more than 300 times less than some commercial alternatives. The bespoke design is parametric and easily adjusted for many applications. By designing using open-source principles and the proposed procedures, the outcome will be customizable, under control of the researcher, less expensive than commercial options, more maintainable, and will have many applications that benefit the user since the design documentation is open and freely accessible. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>A rendering of the slide dryer in OpenSCAD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Barrel jack connections and covering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The completed 30-slide open-source dryer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average surface temperature of slides as a function of time for the open-source slide dryer (30-slide version).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The thermal distribution of the wet slides while drying.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparing design options for the open-source slide dryer: 66-slide dryer behind a 30-slide dryer.</p>
Full article ">
2270 KiB  
Article
Distributed Manufacturing of Flexible Products: Technical Feasibility and Economic Viability
by Aubrey L. Woern and Joshua M. Pearce
Technologies 2017, 5(4), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies5040071 - 30 Oct 2017
Cited by 56 | Viewed by 15620
Abstract
Distributed manufacturing even at the household level is now well established with the combined use of open source designs and self-replicating rapid prototyper (RepRap) 3-D printers. Previous work has shown substantial economic consumer benefits for producing their own polymer products. Now flexible filaments [...] Read more.
Distributed manufacturing even at the household level is now well established with the combined use of open source designs and self-replicating rapid prototyper (RepRap) 3-D printers. Previous work has shown substantial economic consumer benefits for producing their own polymer products. Now flexible filaments are available at roughly 3-times the cost of more conventional 3-D printing materials. To provide some insight into the potential for flexible filament to be both technically feasible and economically viable for distributed digital manufacturing at the consumer level this study investigates 20 common flexible household products. The 3-D printed products were quantified by print time, electrical energy use and filament consumption by mass to determine the cost to fabricate with a commercial RepRap 3-D printer. Printed parts were inspected and when necessary tested for their targeted application to ensure technical feasibility. Then, the experimentally measured cost to DIY manufacturers was compared to low and high market prices for comparable commercially available products. In addition, the mark-up and potential for long-term price declines was estimated for flexible filaments by converting thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) pellets into filament and reground TPE from a local recycling center into filament using an open source recyclebot. This study found that commercial flexible filament is economically as well as technically feasible for providing a means of distributed home-scale manufacturing of flexible products. The results found a 75% savings when compared to the least expensive commercially equivalent products and 92% when compared to high market priced products. Roughly, 160 flexible objects must be substituted to recover the capital costs to print flexible materials. However, as previous work has shown the Lulzbot Mini 3-D printer used in this study would provide more than a 100% ROI printing one object a week from hard thermoplastics, the upgrade needed to provide flexible filament capabilities can be accomplished with 37 average substitution flexible prints. This, again easily provides a triple digit return on investment printing one product a week. Although these savings, which are created by printing objects at home are substantial, the results also have shown the savings could be further increased to 93% when the use of a pellet extruder and TPE pellets, and 99% if recycled TPE filament made with a recyclebot is used. The capital costs of a recyclebot can be recovered in the manufacturing of about 9 kg of TPE filament, which can be accomplished in less than a week, enabling improved environmental impact as well as a strong financial return for heavy 3-D printer users. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Innovations in Materials Processing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Lulzbot Mini with FlexyStruder upgrade mid-print with recycled thermoplastic elastomer (TPE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of flexible 3-D printed automotive related part, 2″ gasket—shown enlarged for clarity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of household item, hammer ergonomic grip.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example of product accessory, GoPro Session Camera Case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of medical device component: newborn medical ventilator bag.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Standard settings for Cura using the standard settings for four 2 1/2″ oil resistant gaskets.</p>
Full article ">
9254 KiB  
Article
Open Source 3-D Printed Nutating Mixer
by Dhwani K. Trivedi and Joshua M. Pearce
Appl. Sci. 2017, 7(9), 942; https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090942 - 13 Sep 2017
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 10115
Abstract
As the open source development of additive manufacturing has led to low-cost desktop three-dimensional (3-D) printing, a number of scientists throughout the world have begun to share digital designs of free and open source scientific hardware. Open source scientific hardware enables custom experimentation, [...] Read more.
As the open source development of additive manufacturing has led to low-cost desktop three-dimensional (3-D) printing, a number of scientists throughout the world have begun to share digital designs of free and open source scientific hardware. Open source scientific hardware enables custom experimentation, laboratory control, rapid upgrading, transparent maintenance, and lower costs in general. To aid in this trend, this study describes the development, design, assembly, and operation of a 3-D printable open source desktop nutating mixer, which provides a fixed 20° platform tilt angle for a gentle three-dimensional (gyrating) agitation of chemical or biological samples (e.g., DNA or blood samples) without foam formation. The custom components for the nutating mixer are designed using open source FreeCAD software to enable customization. All of the non-readily available components can be fabricated with a low-cost RepRap 3-D printer using an open source software tool chain from common thermoplastics. All of the designs are open sourced and can be configured to add more functionality to the equipment in the future. It is relatively easy to assemble and is accessible to both the science education of younger students as well as state-of-the-art research laboratories. Overall, the open source nutating mixer can be fabricated with US$37 in parts, which is 1/10th of the cost of proprietary nutating mixers with similar capabilities. The open source nature of the device allow it to be easily repaired or upgraded with digital files, as well as to accommodate custom sample sizes and mixing velocities with minimal additional costs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science and Engineering)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Disassembled 3-D printed components of the open source nutating mixer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Base of the open source nutating mixer printed with PLA and showing the 12 V 25 RPM DC geared motor mounted in place.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Bearing holder printed with polylactic acid (PLA). (<b>a</b>) in base; (<b>b</b>) detail; (<b>c</b>) FreeCAD side view showing 20° tilt angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Rod design for the open source nutating mixer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cover design (left) and 3-D printed cover assembled detail (right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Platform printed with black PLA. The underside of the platform showing the attachment of the rod with M3 nuts and bolts is shown on the left and the platform mounted on the mixer assembly without the dimpled mat is shown on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Dimpled mat 3-D printed with NinjaFlex. The spacing of the dimples can be adjusted to hold various tube sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>NinjaFlex slit design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Base assembly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Circuit for DC motor with double pole double throw (DPDT) switch and power connector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Rod assembled to the platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Bearing holder position should be parallel to the base and the motor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Visual check needed to determine if the rod hole is aligned with the cover holes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Fully-assembld 3-D printed open source nutating mixer; (<b>b</b>) with samples of various sizes.</p>
Full article ">
12357 KiB  
Article
Three Hundred and Sixty Degree Real-Time Monitoring of 3-D Printing Using Computer Analysis of Two Camera Views
by Siranee Nuchitprasitchai, Michael C. Roggemann and Joshua M. Pearce
J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2017, 1(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp1010002 - 4 Jul 2017
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 9234
Abstract
Prosumer (producing consumer)-based desktop additive manufacturing has been enabled by the recent radical reduction in 3-D printer capital costs created by the open-source release of the self-replicating rapid prototype (RepRap). To continue this success, there have been some efforts to improve reliability, which [...] Read more.
Prosumer (producing consumer)-based desktop additive manufacturing has been enabled by the recent radical reduction in 3-D printer capital costs created by the open-source release of the self-replicating rapid prototype (RepRap). To continue this success, there have been some efforts to improve reliability, which are either too expensive or lacked automation. A promising method to improve reliability is to use computer vision, although the success rates are still too low for widespread use. To overcome these challenges an open source low-cost reliable real-time optimal monitoring platform for 3-D printing from double cameras is presented here. This error detection system is implemented with low-cost web cameras and covers 360 degrees around the printed object from three different perspectives. The algorithm is developed in Python and run on a Raspberry Pi3 mini-computer to reduce costs. For 3-D printing monitoring in three different perspectives, the systems are tested with four different 3-D object geometries for normal operation and failure modes. This system is tested with two different techniques in the image pre-processing step: SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification, and non-rescale and rectification. The error calculations were determined from the horizontal and vertical magnitude methods of 3-D reconstruction images. The non-rescale and rectification technique successfully detects the normal printing and failure state for all models with 100% accuracy, which is better than the single camera set up only. The computation time of the non-rescale and rectification technique is two times faster than the SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification technique. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>MOST (Michigan Tech Open Sustainability Technology) Delta printer experimental setup where three pairs of cameras were placed around the 3-D printer 120 degrees apart then all six images were processed by our Python-algorithms on Raspberry Pi3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of reconstructing 2-D images to 3-D image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Logitech C525 webcam: (<b>a</b>) webcam circuit board and body; and (<b>b</b>) sensor of webcam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example of the checkerboard image where the square size is 7-by-7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Slicing stl file flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Python code for pausing and moving the extruder to take images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Rendering of STereoLithography (STL) models for testing: (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The double camera error detection system flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The example of full model of sun gear image results from the first, the second and the third pair of cameras respectively: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) the images from the left camera; and (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) the images from the right camera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Image pre-processing—SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification: the error detection of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Image pre-processing—SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification: the computational time of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Image pre-processing—SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification: the error detection of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Image pre-processing—SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification: the error detection of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Image pre-processing—SIFT and RANSAC rescale and rectification: the computational time of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Image pre-processing—Non-rescale and rectification: the error detection of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Image pre-processing—Non-rescale and rectification: the computation time of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Image pre-processing—Non-rescale and rectification: the error detection of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Image pre-processing—Non-rescale and rectification: the computation time of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Error detection—Horizontal magnitude: the error detection of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Error detection—Horizontal magnitude: the computation time of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Error detection—Horizontal and vertical magnitude: the computation time of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20 Cont.
<p>Error detection—Horizontal and vertical magnitude: the computation time of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) Prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Summary of image pre-processing: the error detection of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Summary of image pre-processing: the computation time of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Summary of image pre-processing: the error detection of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Summary of image pre-processing: the computation time of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Summary of error detection: the error detection of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Summary of error detection: the computation time of normal printing state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Summary of error detection: the error detection of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Summary of error detection: the computation time of failure state for (<b>a</b>) sun gear; (<b>b</b>) prism; (<b>c</b>) gear; and (<b>d</b>) t55gear.</p>
Full article ">
7389 KiB  
Article
Free and Open Source 3-D Model Customizer for Websites to Democratize Design with OpenSCAD
by Yuenyong Nilsiam and Joshua M. Pearce
Designs 2017, 1(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/designs1010005 - 3 Jul 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 10252
Abstract
3-D printing has entered the consumer market because of recent radical price declines. Consumers can save substantial money by offsetting purchases with DIY pre-designed 3-D printed products. However, even more value can be obtained with distributed manufacturing using mass customization. Unfortunately, the average [...] Read more.
3-D printing has entered the consumer market because of recent radical price declines. Consumers can save substantial money by offsetting purchases with DIY pre-designed 3-D printed products. However, even more value can be obtained with distributed manufacturing using mass customization. Unfortunately, the average consumer is not technically sophisticated enough to easily design their own products. One solution to this is the use of an overlay on OpenSCAD parametric code, although current solutions force users to relinquish all rights to their own designs. There is thus a substantial need in the open source design community for a libre 3-D model customizer, which can be used in any design repository to democratize design. This study reports on the design, function, and validation of such software: the Free Open Source 3-D Customizer. It is demonstrated with a case study of the customization of 3-D printable external breast prosthetics. The results showed that novice users can adjust the available parameters according to their needs and save these to a new file on a website. This PHP (recursive acronym for PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor) library is free and open source and has potential for increasing the usefulness of online repositories to enable distributed manufacturing using consumer customized 3-D printable products. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The flowchart of the use of the Free Open Source 3-D Customizer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The initial page of Free and Open Source 3-D Customizer loading the example SCAD file from <a href="#sec2dot3-designs-01-00005" class="html-sec">Section 2.3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The parameters were adjusted on the Free Open Source 3-D Customizer page to create a new design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The new SCAD file was saved, and the Free Open Source 3-D Customizer page was reloaded with this new SCAD file.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The measurement of the width of the breast (B) or the length over the top (L).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The prosthetic breast model customizable in size on the Free Open Source 3-D Customizer with different options (<b>a</b>) for flat width measurement and (<b>b</b>) for rounded length measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changing infill (red) of the prosthetic breast model in Slic3r Prusa Edition. The wall or skin (yellow) has no z step line.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop