[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (49)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = SUHII

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 8176 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Urban Heat Island Effects in the Southwestern Plateau of China: A Comparative Analysis of Nine Estimation Methods
by Ziyang Ma, Huyan Fu, Jianghai Wen and Zhiru Chen
Land 2025, 14(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010037 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 498
Abstract
Surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) is a critical indicator of the urban heat island (UHI) effect. However, discrepancies in estimation methods may introduce uncertainty in SUHII values. While previous studies have examined the responses of SUHII to different methods at large scales, [...] Read more.
Surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) is a critical indicator of the urban heat island (UHI) effect. However, discrepancies in estimation methods may introduce uncertainty in SUHII values. While previous studies have examined the responses of SUHII to different methods at large scales, further analysis is needed for plateau cities in southwestern China, which have complex geographical features. This study investigates the spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of SUHII in 200 plateau cities across southwestern China via nine estimation methods that incorporate rural ranges and elevation-based conditions. The results show that: (1) The annual average daytime and nighttime SUHII for these cities were 0.97 ± 0.78 °C (mean ± std) and 0.21 ± 0.87 °C, respectively. For 22% of the cities during the day and 26% at night, the choice of different SUHII estimation methods resulted in the transformation between a surface urban heat island (SUHI) and a surface urban cold island (SUCI) due to the exclusion of rural pixels more than ±50 m from the median urban elevation. Compared with other regions, high-altitude plateau cities exhibited a slightly lower daytime SUHII but a significantly higher nighttime SUHII because of the lower atmospheric pressure in plateau areas, which limits the conduction and retention of heat. Consequently, heat dissipates more quickly at night, increasing SUHII values. (2) The mean ΔSUHIIAD (absolute difference in SUHII values across methods) was 0.51 ± 0.01 °C during the day and 0.44 ± 0.02 °C at night. (3) In high-altitude plateau cities, for all methods, the correlation of the SUHII with influencing factors was stronger, highlighting their sensitivity to both environmental and anthropogenic influences. These results enhance our understanding of plateau UHI dynamics and highlight the importance of considering appropriate rural definitions for cities with varying geographical characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution of rural ranges in Kunming; (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) correspond to rural ranges 1 (R1), 2 (R1), and 3 (R1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of average daytime SUHII for cities in Southwest China over the last twenty years. M1–M9 correspond to the methods described in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, with the black numbers below each subplot indicating the proportion of cities with SUHI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of average nighttime SUHII for cities in Southwest China over the last twenty years. M1–M9 correspond to the methods described in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, with the black numbers below each subplot indicating the proportion of cities with SUHI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Box plots of the average daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>) SUHII for cities in Southwest China over twenty years. M1–M9 correspond to the methods described in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, with the black numbers indicating the average SUHII values and standard deviations (mean ± std) for the nine estimation methods. The midline of the box indicates the median, while the colored points and error bars dictate the mean values and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Seasonal variations in the average daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>) SUHII for cities in Southwest China over the last twenty years. M1–M9 correspond to the methods described in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, with the colored points indicating the mean values and the error bars indicating the 95% confidence intervals. The black dashed line indicates the average SUHII values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of the average daytime and nighttime LST in cities of the Tibet Autonomous Region over the last twenty years, where a, b, c, and d represent the regions of Seni District in Naqu, Duilongdeqing District, Chengguan District in Lhasa, and Sangzhuzi District in Shigatse, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Box plots of annual average daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>) SUHIIs for cities in Southwest China across different terrains. The box represents the interquartile range, with the line inside indicating the median. The colored points and error bars represent the mean and the 95% confidence interval, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Seasonal variations in the annual average daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>) SUHIIs for cities in Southwest China across different terrains. The colored points and error bars represent the mean values and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between annual average daytime and nighttime SUHIIs and influencing factors. Population (log(P)); urban area (UA); enhanced vegetation index (EVI); white sky albedo (WSA); monthly average temperature (MAT); monthly total precipitation (MTP); Δ represents the difference in influencing factors between urban and rural areas; A represents the difference in influencing factors between summer and winter. Asterisks (*) denote statistical significance at the 0.05 level, while double asterisks (**) denote statistical significance at the 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between annual average daytime SUHIIs and influencing factors for cities in Southwest China across different terrains. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent basin cities, hilly and mountainous cities, low-elevation plateau cities, and high-elevation plateau cities, respectively. Population (log(P)); urban area (UA); enhanced vegetation index (EVI); white sky albedo (WSA); monthly average temperature (MAT); monthly total precipitation (MTP); Δ represents the difference between urban and rural areas; A represents the difference between summer and winter. An asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance at the 0.05 level, and two asterisks (**) indicate statistical significance at the 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between annual average nighttime SUHIIs and influencing factors for cities in Southwest China across different terrains. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent basin cities, hilly and mountainous cities, low-elevation plateau cities, and high-elevation plateau cities, respectively. Population (log(P)); urban area (UA); enhanced vegetation index (EVI); white sky albedo (WSA); monthly average temperature (MAT); monthly total precipitation (MTP); Δ represents the difference between urban and rural areas; A represents the difference between summer and winter. An asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance at the 0.05 level, and two asterisks (**) indicate statistical significance at the 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Correlations between daytime SUHII values for the nine estimation methods. M1–M9 refer to the methods outlined in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, with the horizontal and vertical axes representing the daytime SUHII (°C) for each estimation method. The red points indicate the daytime SUHII for each city, and the green line represents the trend line. The value of r denotes the correlation, and all results are statistically significant at the 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Correlation between nighttime SUHII values for the nine estimation methods. M1–M9 refer to the methods outlined in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, with the horizontal and vertical axes representing the nighttime SUHII (°C) for each estimation method. The blue points indicate the nighttime SUHII for each city, and the green line represents the trend line. The value of r denotes the correlation, and all results are statistically significant at the 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Overlay frequency distribution of the average daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>) ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> for cities in Southwest China over twenty years. ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> represents the absolute difference in SUHII between different estimation methods. The horizontal axis denotes the ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> between different methods (e.g., M1–M2 represents the ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> between method 1 and method 2, as shown in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>), and the vertical axis represents the proportion of each ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Box plot of the average daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>) ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> for cities in Southwest China over twenty years. ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> represents the absolute difference in SUHII between different estimation methods. The horizontal axis denotes the differences between various methods (e.g., M1–M2 represents the ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> between methods 1 and 2 as described in <a href="#land-14-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>). The black dashed line, along with the accompanying numbers, represents the mean and standard deviation (mean ± std) of the ΔSUHII<sub>AD</sub> for all method pairs. The line inside the box indicates the median, while the colored points represent the average values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Relationship between the average rural LST and the number of pixels for cities in Southwest China over twenty years. Panels (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) correspond to R1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 53469 KiB  
Article
Urban Morphology and Surface Urban Heat Island Relationship During Heat Waves: A Study of Milan and Lecce (Italy)
by Antonio Esposito, Gianluca Pappaccogli, Antonio Donateo, Pietro Salizzoni, Giuseppe Maffeis, Teodoro Semeraro, Jose Luis Santiago and Riccardo Buccolieri
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4496; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234496 - 30 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1050
Abstract
The urban heat island (UHI) effect, marked by higher temperatures in urban areas compared to rural ones, is a key indicator of human-driven environmental changes. This study aims to identify the key morphological parameters that primarily contribute to the development of surface urban [...] Read more.
The urban heat island (UHI) effect, marked by higher temperatures in urban areas compared to rural ones, is a key indicator of human-driven environmental changes. This study aims to identify the key morphological parameters that primarily contribute to the development of surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) and investigates the relationship between SUHII and urban morphology using land surface temperature (LST) data from the Sentinel-3 satellite. The research focuses on Milan and Lecce, analyzing how urban geometry affects SUHII. Factors such as building height, aspect ratio, sky visibility, and surface cover are examined using approximately 1000 satellite images from 2022 and 2023. The study highlights seasonal and diurnal variations in SUHII, with particular emphasis on HW periods. Through multicollinearity and multiple regression analyses, the study identifies the main morphological drivers influencing SUHII in the two cities, specifically the Impervious Surface Fraction (ISF) and Mean Building Height (HM). Milan consistently exhibits higher SUHII, particularly during HWs, while Lecce experiences a negative SUHII, especially during the summer, due to lower urban density, more vegetation, and the low soil moisture around the urban area. Both cities show positive SUHII values at night, which are slightly elevated during HWs. The heat wave analysis reveals the areas most susceptible to overheating, typically characterized by high urban density, with ISF and HM values in some cases above the 90th percentile (0.8 and 13.0 m, respectively) compared to the overall distribution, particularly for Milan. The research emphasizes the importance of urban morphology in influencing SUHII, suggesting that detailed morphological analysis is crucial for developing climate adaptation and urban planning strategies to reduce urban overheating and improve urban resilience to climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Planning Supported by Remote Sensing Technology II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study areas, with Milan above (<b>a</b>) and Lecce below (<b>c</b>). Urban areas are highlighted in red, while the blue area delineates regions designated for identifying rural areas. An adjacent zoom-in image (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) displays rural areas identified by a pervious surface fraction (PSF) greater than 95%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daytime (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and nighttime (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) SUHII as a function of different urban morphological parameters for the two cities; values refer to summer period. Error bars represent the standard error, which is between 0.10 °C and 0.20 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Daytime (<b>a</b>) and nighttime (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) SUHII as a function of different urban morphological parameters for the two cities; values refer to winter period. Error bars represent the standard error, which is between 0.10 °C and 0.20 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Boxplot of SUHII during HW (in red) and NHW (in white) in Milan (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and Lecce (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>). The black dots indicate the mean values, and the lines are the median values. The boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, while the whiskers correspond to ±2.7σ and 99.3% data coverage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SUHII as a function of urban morphological parameters in Lecce and Milano during HW (continuous line) and NHW (dashed line) periods for ISF, BSF, AR, HM, and SVF (all parameter values were normalized); values refer to nighttime. Error bars represent the standard error, which is below 0.20 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>As in the <a href="#remotesensing-16-04496-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, but during daytime in the city of Lecce. Error bars represent the standard error, which is below 0.20 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Differences in mean SUHII during HWs and NHWs for the city of Milan during nighttime (<b>a</b>) and the city of Lecce during daytime (<b>b</b>). Black squares indicate areas with differences above/below than 0.70 °C, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Values refer to LST data for 16 July 2023, at 9:34 a.m. showing the SUHII effect on the urban area of Lecce. (<b>b</b>) Correlation between soil moisture and daytime SUHII in Lecce, throughout the analyzed period during HW (black symbols) and NHW (red symbols) and for the winter period of 2022 and 2023 (blue symbols).</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 14211 KiB  
Article
Synergising Machine Learning and Remote Sensing for Urban Heat Island Dynamics: A Comprehensive Modelling Approach
by Guglielmina Mutani, Alessandro Scalise, Xhoana Sufa and Stefania Grasso
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1435; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121435 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 680
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of sustainable urban regeneration projects in mitigating Urban Heat Island (UHI) effects through a place-based approach. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and satellite imagery were integrated with machine learning (ML) models to analyse the urban environment, human activities, and [...] Read more.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of sustainable urban regeneration projects in mitigating Urban Heat Island (UHI) effects through a place-based approach. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and satellite imagery were integrated with machine learning (ML) models to analyse the urban environment, human activities, and climate data in Turin, Italy. A detailed analysis of the ex-industrial Teksid area revealed a significant reduction in Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity (SUHII), with decreases of −0.94 in summer and −0.54 in winter following regeneration interventions. Using 17 variables in the Random Forest model, key determinants influencing SUHII were identified, including building density, vegetation cover, and surface albedo. This study quantitatively highlights the impact of increasing green spaces and enhancing surface materials to improve solar reflectivity, with findings showing a 19.46% increase in vegetation and a 3.09% rise in albedo after mitigation efforts. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that integrating Local Climate Zones (LCZs) into urban planning, alongside interventions targeting these key variables, can further optimise UHI mitigation and assess changes. This comprehensive approach provides policymakers with a robust tool to enhance urban resilience and guide sustainable planning strategies in response to climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue UHI Analysis and Evaluation with Remote Sensing Data)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the methodology used to evaluate UHI effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical cartography plant (1955–1969), City of Turin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Former industrial Teksid area in Turin, 1920 (Immagini del cambiamento, archivio CDS5, <a href="https://areeweb.polito.it/imgdc/schede/PD04.html" target="_blank">https://areeweb.polito.it/imgdc/schede/PD04.html</a> (accessed on 20 July 2024)). (<b>b</b>) Regeneration program in Spina 3. Google Cartographical Data, 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Maps of the BCR in Turin (m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>) in the years (<b>a</b>) 2001 and (<b>b</b>) 2018. Grid UTM Zone 32N.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maps of the NDVI in August in the years (<b>a</b>) 2001 and (<b>b</b>) 2018. Grid UTM Zone 32N.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SUHII elaborated from satellite imagery in August: (<b>a</b>) 2001; (<b>b</b>) 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Random Forest regression modelling (authors’ own elaboration).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Line fit plots of SUHII-related variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Multilinear regression of SUHII.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of SUHII in the different seasons of 2001 and 2018 in the ex-Teksid area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>NDVI during summer in 2001 and 2018 in the ex-Teksid area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The NDMI during mid-season in 2001 and 2018 in the ex-Teksid area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Albedo during summer in 2001 and 2018 in the ex-Teksid area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The model of Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity (SUHII) in 2001 and 2018 using the Random Forest regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Cartographic representation of LCZs’ and urban settlements’ m.i.s for the city of Turin and its surroundings (as specified in <a href="#atmosphere-15-01435-t012" class="html-table">Table 12</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison between the results of the SUHII model in August 2021 (on the <b>left</b>) and the anthropogenic heat output of Local Climate Zones (on the <b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4347 KiB  
Article
Seasonal and Diurnal Characteristics and Drivers of Urban Heat Island Based on Optimal Parameters-Based Geo-Detector Model in Xinjiang, China
by Han Chen, Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin, Abudukeyimu Abulizi, Meiling Huang, Tongtong Tao and Yunfei Ma
Atmosphere 2024, 15(11), 1377; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111377 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 747
Abstract
In the context of sustainable urban development, elucidating urban heat island (UHI) dynamics in arid regions is crucial. By thoroughly examining the characteristics of UHI variations and potential driving factors, cities can implement effective strategies to reduce their impacts on the environment and [...] Read more.
In the context of sustainable urban development, elucidating urban heat island (UHI) dynamics in arid regions is crucial. By thoroughly examining the characteristics of UHI variations and potential driving factors, cities can implement effective strategies to reduce their impacts on the environment and public health. However, the driving factors of a UHI in arid regions remain unclear. This study analyzed seasonal and diurnal variations in a surface UHI (SUHI) and the potential driving factors using Pearson’s correlation analysis and an Optimal Parameters-Based Geographic Detector (OPGD) model in 22 cities in Xinjiang, northwest China. The findings reveal that the average annual surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) values in Xinjiang’s cities were 1.37 ± 0.86 °C, with the SUHII being most pronounced in summer (2.44 °C), followed by winter (2.15 °C), spring (0.47 °C), and autumn (0.40 °C). Moreover, the annual mean SUHII was stronger at nighttime (1.90 °C) compared to during the daytime (0.84 °C), with variations observed across seasons. The seasonal disparity of SUHII in Xinjiang was more significant during the daytime (3.91 °C) compared to nighttime (0.39 °C), with daytime and nighttime SUHIIs decreasing from summer to winter. The study also highlights that the city size, elevation, vegetation cover, urban form, and socio-economic factors (GDP and population density) emerged as key drivers, with the GDP exerting the strongest influence on SUHIIs in cities across Xinjiang. To mitigate the UHI effects, measures like urban environment enhancement by improving surface conditions, blue–green space development, landscape optimization, and economic strategy adjustments are recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Heat Islands, Global Warming and Effects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Topographic map of Xinjiang and the locations of 22 major cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distributions of the SUHII in Xinjiang’s 22 major cities, including (<b>a</b>) the spring daytime SUHII; (<b>b</b>) spring nighttime SUHII; (<b>c</b>) summer daytime SUHII; (<b>d</b>) summer nighttime SUHII; (<b>e</b>) autumn daytime SUHII; (<b>f</b>) autumn nighttime SUHII; (<b>g</b>) winter daytime SUHII; and (<b>h</b>) winter nighttime SUHII.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The seasonal and diurnal variations in the SUHII in Xinjiang.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bivariate map of the relationships between urban size and the SUHII in Xinjiang’s 22 major cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mean, maximum and minimum SUHII values for different city sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlations between driving factors and the SUHII in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Detecting the impact of a single factor on the SUHII using the OPGD model. including (<b>a</b>) the spring daytime; (<b>b</b>) summer daytime; (<b>c</b>) autumn daytime; (<b>d</b>) winter daytime; (<b>e</b>) spring nighttime; (<b>f</b>) summer nighttime; (<b>g</b>) autumn nighttime; and (<b>h</b>) winter nighttime.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 35562 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Surface Urban Heat Island in the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area Based on Local Climate Zones
by Xiaxuan He, Qifeng Yuan, Yinghong Qin, Junwen Lu and Gang Li
Land 2024, 13(10), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101626 - 7 Oct 2024
Viewed by 949
Abstract
Understanding the driving mechanisms behind surface urban heat island (SUHI) effects is essential for mitigating the degradation of urban thermal environments and enhancing urban livability. However, previous studies have primarily concentrated on central urban areas, lacking a comprehensive analysis of the entire metropolitan [...] Read more.
Understanding the driving mechanisms behind surface urban heat island (SUHI) effects is essential for mitigating the degradation of urban thermal environments and enhancing urban livability. However, previous studies have primarily concentrated on central urban areas, lacking a comprehensive analysis of the entire metropolitan area over distinct time periods. Additionally, most studies have relied on regression analysis models such as ordinary least squares (OLS) or logistic regression, without adequately analyzing the spatial heterogeneity of factors influencing the surface urban heat island (SUHI) effects. Therefore, this study aims to explore the spatial heterogeneity and driving mechanisms of surface urban heat island (SUHI) effects in the Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area across different time periods. The Local Climate Zones (LCZs) method was employed to analyze the landscape characteristics and spatial structure of the Guangzhou-Foshan metropolis for the years 2013, 2018, and 2023. Furthermore, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Multi-scale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR), and Geographical Detector (GD) models were utilized to investigate the interactions between influencing factors (land cover factors, urban environmental factors, socio-economic factors) and Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity (SUHII), maximizing the explanation of SUHII across all time periods. Three main findings emerged: First, the Local Climate Zones (LCZs) in the Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity, with a non-linear relationship to SUHII. Second, the SUHI effects displayed a distinct core-periphery pattern, with Large lowrise (LCZ 8) and compact lowrise (LCZ 3) areas showing the highest SUHII levels in urban core zones. Third, land cover factors emerged as the most influential factors on SUHI effects in the Guangzhou-Foshan metropolis. These results indicate that SUHI effects exhibit notable spatial heterogeneity, and varying negative influencing factors can be leveraged to mitigate SUHI effects in different metropolitan locations. Such findings offer crucial insights for future urban policy-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planning for Sustainable Urban and Land Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The workflow of the research methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LCZ maps of Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area in 2013 (<b>a</b>), 2018 (<b>b</b>), 2023 (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The trend of area variation for different LCZs in 2013, 2018 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial-temporal distribution of LST in Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area in 2013 (<b>a</b>), 2018 (<b>b</b>), 2023 (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Spatial-temporal distribution of LST in Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area in 2013 (<b>a</b>), 2018 (<b>b</b>), 2023 (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial-temporal distribution of SUHI effect in Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area in 2013 (<b>left</b>), 2018 (<b>middle</b>), 2023 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SUHI effects distribution in the Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SUHII (K) of diverse LCZ types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>LCZ-based variables’ coefficients on SUHII in 2013 (<b>a</b>), 2018 (<b>b</b>), and 2023 (<b>c</b>). (Note: * indicates significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** indicates significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** indicates significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>MGWR analysis of SUHI effects influential factors of built type LCZs in 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>MGWR analysis of SUHI effects influential factors of built type LCZs in 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>MGWR analysis of SUHI effects influential factors of built type LCZs in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Contributions of influencing factors on SUHI effects. (Note: * indicates significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** indicates significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** indicates significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 15371 KiB  
Article
Research on the Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Changsha’s Surface Urban Heat Island from the Perspective of Local Climate Zones
by Yanfen Xiang, Bohong Zheng, Jiren Wang, Jiajun Gong and Jian Zheng
Land 2024, 13(9), 1479; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091479 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1062
Abstract
Optimizing urban spatial morphology is one of the most effective methods for improving the urban thermal environment. Some studies have used the local climate zones (LCZ) classification system to examine the relationship between urban spatial morphology and Surface Urban Heat Islands (SUHIs). However, [...] Read more.
Optimizing urban spatial morphology is one of the most effective methods for improving the urban thermal environment. Some studies have used the local climate zones (LCZ) classification system to examine the relationship between urban spatial morphology and Surface Urban Heat Islands (SUHIs). However, these studies often rely on single-time-point data, failing to consider the changes in urban space and the time-series LCZ mapping relationships. This study utilized remote sensing data from Landsat 5, 7, and 8–9 to retrieve land surface temperatures in Changsha from 2005 to 2020 using the Mono-Window Algorithm. The spatial-temporal evolution of the LCZ and the Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity (SUHII) was then examined and analyzed. This study aims to (1) propose a localized, long-time LCZ mapping method, (2) investigate the spatial-temporal relationship between the LCZ and the SUHII, and (3) develop a more convenient SUHI assessment method for urban planning and design. The results showed that the spatial-temporal evolution of the LCZ reflects the sequence of urban expansion. In terms of quantity, the number of built-type LCZs maintaining their original types is low, with each undergoing at least one type change. The open LCZs increased the most, followed by the sparse and the composite LCZs. Spatially, the LCZs experience reverse transitions due to urban expansion and quality improvements in central urban areas. Seasonal changes in the LCZ types and the SUHI vary, with differences not only among the LCZ types but also in building heights within the same type. The relative importance of the LCZ parameters also differs between seasons. The SUHI model constructed using Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with R2 values of 0.911 for summer and 0.777 for winter. In practical case validation, the model explained 97.86% of the data for summer and 96.77% for winter. This study provides evidence-based planning recommendations to mitigate urban heat and create a comfortable built environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of LCZ Parameters from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Distribution of LCZ Parameters from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The semivariogram model of building height.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Various schematic diagrams of local climate zones in Changsha City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The LCZ maps in the years 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The spatial variation of the LCZ types from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The urban structural development directions from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatiotemporal distribution of the LST in Changsha in summer and winter in 2005, 2010, 2016 and 2020: (<b>a</b>) 2005, (<b>b</b>) 2010, (<b>c</b>) 2016, and (<b>d</b>) 2020 in summer; (<b>e</b>) 2005, (<b>f</b>) 2010, (<b>g</b>) 2016, and (<b>h</b>) 2020 in winter; A: Lugu High-Tech Industrial Park, B: Changsha Economic and Technological Development Zone, C: Changsha Tianxin Economic Development Zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Changes of the SUHII in the LCZ in summer and winter in 2005, 2010, 2016, and 2020: (<b>a</b>) 2005, (<b>b</b>) 2010, (<b>c</b>) 2016, and (<b>d</b>) 2020 in summer; (<b>e</b>) 2005, (<b>f</b>) 2010, (<b>g</b>) 2016 and (<b>h</b>) 2020 in winter. The boxplots represent the variation of SUHII values for each LCZ type, while the strip plots indicate the mean SUHII value for each LCZ type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Relative influences of the LCZ parameters in the two seasons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>BRT model’s prediction results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The location and LST of Wangcheng District.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 14507 KiB  
Article
Sensitivity of Local Climate Zones and Urban Functional Zones to Multi-Scenario Surface Urban Heat Islands
by Haojian Deng, Shiran Zhang, Minghui Chen, Jiali Feng and Kai Liu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 3048; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16163048 - 19 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1501
Abstract
Local climate zones (LCZs) and urban functional zones (UFZs) can intricately depict the multidimensional spatial elements of cities, offering a comprehensive perspective for understanding the surface urban heat island (SUHI) effect. In this study, we retrieved two types of land surface temperature (LST) [...] Read more.
Local climate zones (LCZs) and urban functional zones (UFZs) can intricately depict the multidimensional spatial elements of cities, offering a comprehensive perspective for understanding the surface urban heat island (SUHI) effect. In this study, we retrieved two types of land surface temperature (LST) data and constructed 12 SUHI scenarios over the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Central region using six SUHI identification methods. It compared the SUHI sensitivity differences among different types of LCZ and UFZ to analyze the global and local sensitivity differences of influencing factors in the 12 SUHI scenarios by utilizing the spatial gradient boosting trees, geographically weighted regression, and the coefficient of variation model. Results showed the following: (1) The sensitivity of different LCZ and UFZ types to multi-scenario SUHI was significantly affected by differences in SUHI identification methods and non-urban references. (2) In the morning, the shading effect of building clusters reduced the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) of some built environment types (such as LCZ 1 (compact high-rise zone) to LCZ 5 (open midrise zone)). The SUHIIs of LCZ E (bare rock or paved zone) and LCZ 10 (industry zone) were 4.22 °C and 3.87 °C, respectively, and both are classified as highly sensitive to SUHI. (3) The sensitivity of SUHI influencing factors exhibited regional variability, with importance differences in the sensitivity of importance for factors such as the impervious surface ratio, elevation, average building height, vegetation coverage, and average building volume between LCZs and UFZs. Amongst the 12 SUHI scenarios, an average of 87.43% and 89.97% of areas in LCZs and UFZs, respectively, were found to have low spatial sensitivity types. Overall, this study helps urban planners and managers gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of the SUHI effect in high-density cities, providing a scientific basis for future urban climate adaptability planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing for Geospatial Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Central (GBAC) region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Non-urban references for five types of SUHIs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of LST derived from the radiative transfer equation (RTE) method and the nonlinear split window (NSW) method: (<b>a</b>) LST retrieved by the RTE, (<b>b</b>) LST retrieved by the NSW, (<b>c</b>) shows a comparison of RTE LST and NSW LST at the same spatial locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of Landsat 8 LST and MODIS LST data, and temperatures recorded by meteorological stations: (<b>a</b>) shows a comparison between RTE LST and MODIS LST, (<b>b</b>) shows a comparison between RTE LST and temperatures recorded by meteorological stations, (<b>c</b>) shows a comparison between NSW LST and MODIS LST, (<b>d</b>) shows a comparison between NSW LST and temperatures recorded by meteorological stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of the SUHIs intensity in 12 scenarios within LCZs and UFZs: (<b>a1</b>–<b>a12</b>) show the spatial distribution of SUHI in LCZs, (<b>b1</b>–<b>b12</b>) show the spatial distribution of SUHI in UFZs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sensitivity of different LCZ and UFZ types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Importance of influencing factors in 12 SUHII scenarios: (<b>a</b>) for LCZ, (<b>b</b>) for UFZ, with heatmaps showing the importance values of influencing factors in the 12 SUHII scenarios, and bar graphs representing the coefficient of variation of importance values of influencing factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Coefficient of variation values for SUHI influencing factors in LCZs under 12 SUHI scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Coefficient of variation values for SUHI influencing factors in UFZs under 12 SUHI scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Examples of representative LCZs from Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Central (GBAC) region. This classification system is segmented into built types (LCZ 1 to LCZ 10) and natural types (LCZ A to LCZ G).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 26696 KiB  
Article
Scale Differences and Gradient Effects of Local Climate Zone Spatial Pattern on Urban Heat Island Impact—A Case in Guangzhou’s Core Area
by Yan Rao, Shaohua Zhang, Kun Yang, Yan Ma, Weilin Wang and Lede Niu
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6656; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156656 - 3 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1760
Abstract
With the continuous development of cities, the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) is increasing, leading to the deterioration of the urban thermal environment, increasing energy consumption, and endangering the health of urban residents. Understanding the spatio-temporal scale difference and gradient effect of [...] Read more.
With the continuous development of cities, the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) is increasing, leading to the deterioration of the urban thermal environment, increasing energy consumption, and endangering the health of urban residents. Understanding the spatio-temporal scale difference and gradient effect of urban spatial patterns on the impact of SUHII is crucial for improving the climate resilience of cities and promoting sustainable urban development. This paper investigated the characteristics of SUHII changes at different time periods based on local climate zones (LCZs) and downscaled land surface temperature (LST) data. Meanwhile, landscape pattern indicators and the multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model were utilized to analyze the impacts of urban spatial patterns on SUHII at multiple spatial–temporal scales. The results indicated that the SUHII of each LCZ type exhibited diverse patterns in different time periods. High SUHII occurred in summer daytime and autumn nighttime. Compact and high-rise buildings (LCZ1/2/4) showed markedly higher SUHII during the daytime or nighttime, except for heavy industry. The extent of influence and the dominant factors of LCZ spatial patterns on SUHII exhibit obvious scale differences and gradient effects. At the regional scale, highly regular and compacted built-up areas tended to increase SUHII, while single and continuously distributed built-up areas had a greater impact on increasing SUHII. At the local scale, the impact of the PLAND (1/2/4/5/10) on SUHII exhibited a trend of diminishing from urban to suburban areas. In urban areas, the PLAND of LCZ 1, LCZ 2, and LCZ4 was the major factor affecting the increase in SUHII, whereas, in suburban areas, the PLAND of LCZ 2 and LCZ 10 was the major influencing factor on SUHII. The results can provide a scientific reference for mitigating urban heat island effects and constructing an ecologically ‘designed’ city. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) People’s Republic of China; (<b>b</b>) Guangzhou; (<b>c</b>) study area (Liwan, Yuexiu, Haizhu, Tianhe, Baiyun, Huangpu, Panyu, and Huadu districts) used for regional scale analysis; (<b>d</b>) five sample areas (S1–5) selected for local-scale analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The main framework. (<b>A</b>) LCZ mapping; (<b>B</b>) LST data downscaling; (<b>C</b>) methods and the multiple spatio-temporal scale analysis of SUHII within LCZs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LCZ classification scheme. (<b>a</b>) LCZ types; (<b>b</b>) partial sampling points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The spatial distribution of the LCZ classes in Guangzhou main urban area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of downscaling results from the summer daytime LST data in 2021. (<b>a</b>) Raw MODIS LST (1000 m) data; (<b>b</b>) downscaled 240 m LST data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of daytime/nighttime SUHII. (<b>a</b>) SUHII of the seasonal and annual trends in the daytime; (<b>b</b>) SUHII of the seasonal and annual trends in the nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diurnal seasonal/annual differences in SUHII within LCZs. (<b>a</b>) SUHII of the seasonal and annual trends in the daytime; (<b>b</b>) SUHII of the seasonal and annual trends in the nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial variations of the MGWR regression coefficients in the daytime. (<b>a</b>) Seasonal and annual SUHII; (<b>b</b>) MGWR coefficients of SHAPE_AM; (<b>c</b>) MGWR coefficients of LPI; (<b>d</b>) MGWR coefficients of PD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial variations of the MGWR regression coefficients in the nighttime. (<b>a</b>) Seasonal and annual SUHII; (<b>b</b>) MGWR coefficients of SHAPE_AM; (<b>c</b>) MGWR coefficients of LPI; (<b>d</b>) MGWR coefficients of PD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mean regression coefficients of MGWR for different periods in the five sample regions. Seasonal/annual mean coefficient of PLAND index with SUHII in five districts during nighttime: (<b>a</b>) old urban areas, (<b>b</b>) new urban areas, (<b>c</b>) urban–rural areas, (<b>d</b>) rural areas, and (<b>e</b>) industrial parks. Seasonal/annual mean coefficient of PLAND index with SUHII in five districts during nighttime: (<b>f</b>) old urban areas, (<b>g</b>) new urban areas, (<b>h</b>) urban–rural areas, (<b>i</b>) rural areas, (<b>j</b>) industrial parks.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Mean absolute values of correlation between PLAND (1–10) and summer daytime/nighttime SUHII: (<b>a</b>) correlation of PLAND1_10 with summer daytime SUHII; (<b>b</b>) correlation of PLAND (1–10) with summer daytime SUHII.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 50358 KiB  
Article
A Framework Analyzing Climate Change, Air Quality and Greenery to Unveil Environmental Stress Risk Hotspots
by Priyanka Rao, Patrizia Tassinari and Daniele Torreggiani
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(13), 2420; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132420 - 1 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1312
Abstract
Rapid urbanization has resulted in increased environmental challenges, compounding worries about deteriorating air quality and rising temperatures. As cities become hubs of human activity, understanding the complex interplay of numerous environmental elements is critical for developing effective mitigation solutions. Recognizing this urgency, a [...] Read more.
Rapid urbanization has resulted in increased environmental challenges, compounding worries about deteriorating air quality and rising temperatures. As cities become hubs of human activity, understanding the complex interplay of numerous environmental elements is critical for developing effective mitigation solutions. Recognizing this urgency, a framework to highlight the hotspots with critical environmental issues emerges as a comprehensive approach that incorporates key criteria such as the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII), heat index (HI) and air quality index (AQI) to assess and address the complex web of environmental stressors that grip urban landscapes. Employing the multicriteria decision analysis approach, the proposed framework, named the environmental risk hotspot mapping framework (ERHMF), innovatively applies the analytic hierarchy process at a sub-criteria level, considering long-term heat island trends with recent fluctuations in the HI and AQI. Climate change impact has been symbolized through rising temperatures, as reflected by surface urban heat island intensity trends over two decades. The robustness and correctness of the weights have been assessed by computing the consistency ratio, which came out as 0.046, 0.065 and 0.044 for the sub-criteria of the SUHII, AQI and HI, respectively. Furthermore, the framework delves into the nexus between environmental stressors and vegetation cover, elucidating the role of green spaces in mitigating urban environmental risks. Augmented by spatial and demographic data, the ERHMF adeptly discerns high-risk areas where environmental stress converges with urban development, vulnerable population concentrations and critical vegetation status, thereby facilitating targeted risk management interventions. The framework’s effectiveness has been demonstrated in a regional case study in Italy, underscoring its ability to pinpoint risk hotspots and inform specific policy interventions. The quantitative study undertaken at the sub-administrative level revealed that approximately 6,000,000 m2 of land in Bologna are classified as being under high to extremely high environmental stress, with over 4,000,000 m2 lying only within the extremely high stress group (90–100). Similarly, 1,000,000 m2 of land in Piacenza and Modena have high levels of environmental stress (80–90). In conclusion, the ERHMF presents a holistic methodology for delineating high-risk urban hotspots, providing essential insights for policymakers, urban planners and stakeholders, with the potential to enhance overall urban resilience and foster sustainable development efforts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area map highlighting Emilia-Romagna region with its provinces’ boundaries. In addition, the colored dots represent the location of stations for air quality (blue) and meteorological (red) data for estimation of environmental stress magnitude; key map on top right corner shows regional distribution of Italy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow for ERHMF, where green dotted box consists of environmental stress magnitude criteria, pink dotted box with exposure parameter, light blue with vulnerability, brown with vegetation–based criticality for risk hotspots/risk ranking and red with final outcome: environmental risk hotspots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pairwise matrix of each environmental stress parameter and their consistency check output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The SUHII indicators showing the cumulative spatial variability and yearly mean of the (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mi>I</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mi>I</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mi>I</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the summer months from 2002 to 2022 and (<b>d</b>) the cumulative SUHII indicators combining (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>). The graph with each SUHII indicator map represents the yearly mean trend between 2002 and 2022 for the respective indicator. The SUHII legend with (<b>c</b>) represents the legend for (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cumulative spatial variability of (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>O</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for summer months from year 2020 to 2022; (<b>e</b>) AQI spatial variability combining (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cumulative spatial variability of (<b>a</b>) air temperature at 2 m, (<b>b</b>) RH, (<b>c</b>) average HI, (<b>d</b>) average of max HI, (<b>e</b>) cumulative heat stress days (with HI &gt; 27 °C), (<b>f</b>) cumulative HI intensity (HI &gt; 27 °C) and (<b>g</b>) average difference between T2 and HI for the summer months from 2020 to 2022; (<b>h</b>) cumulative HI indicators combining (<b>c</b>–<b>g</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The multivariate pairwise distribution and scatter plot matrix of the environmental stress magnitude parameters, where the upper right triangle consists of the scatter plot, correlation coefficient and trend line; the lower left triangle represents the KDE plot The color scheme of KDE plot shows the higher (yellow color) to lower (blue color) data points’ concentration within the variable’s distribution. The SUHII, AQI, HI and CESM are normalized between 0 and 100, whereas the EVI is between −1 and 1. The plots are significant with a <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>): (<b>a</b>) The environmental stress magnitude combining the cumulative SUHII, AQI and HI; (<b>b</b>) the population density at 1 km showing the exposure levels; (<b>c</b>) the high vulnerable population class at 1 km; the vegetation–based criticality in the form of (<b>d</b>) LCZ classes showing the spatial distribution of the LULC for the risk ranking; and (<b>e</b>) the EVI showing the spatial vegetation status for the hotspot mapping. (<b>B</b>): The graphs (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) correspond to each map (<b>A</b>) showing the province–wise quantitative distribution of the legend classes of the respective maps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of identified environmental risk hotspots; (<b>b</b>) risk ranking for sub ER provinces; and (<b>c</b>) quantitative area distribution chart showing relative percentage area covered by each environmental stress range in different provinces.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8387 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Surface Urban Heat Island Dynamics in Central Yunnan City Cluster
by Qingping Fang, Chang Liu, Zhibin Ren, Yao Fu, Huapeng Fan, Yongshu Wang and Zhexiu Yu
Sustainability 2024, 16(11), 4819; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114819 - 5 Jun 2024
Viewed by 2233
Abstract
The acceleration of urbanization has led to an increase in urban expansion and population density, exacerbating the urban heat island (UHI) effect. Moreover, the phenomenon has a significant impact on urban ecological environments and human health. Consequently, mitigating the UHI effect and enhancing [...] Read more.
The acceleration of urbanization has led to an increase in urban expansion and population density, exacerbating the urban heat island (UHI) effect. Moreover, the phenomenon has a significant impact on urban ecological environments and human health. Consequently, mitigating the UHI effect and enhancing the ecological environment is crucial. However previous research has primarily focused on individual cities or regional scales, with few studies analyzing all cities within urban agglomerations. This paper conducts a fine-grained spatiotemporal analysis of surface urban heat island (SUHI) effects in the Central Yunnan City Cluster from 2000 to 2021 using Landsat satellite data. We calculate the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) for 44 cities at the county or district level and discuss the quantitative estimation of overall SUHII changes and driving factors in the Central Yunnan City Cluster. Our findings are as follows: 1. Small cities also exhibit UHI effects, with a 75.4% probability of occurrence in the Central Yunnan City Cluster from 2000 to 2021, resulting in an overall decrease in SUHII of 1.21 °C. 2. The temperature increase rate in urban extension areas and suburban areas is faster than that in urban central areas, which is the main reason for the decreasing trend of SUHII. 3. Land use change inhibits the weakening of the SUHI effect, and population change contributes to the formation of this phenomenon. Additionally, the methods and results of this study can provide reasonable and effective insights for the future development and planning of the Central Yunnan City Cluster, thus promoting urban sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Resilience and Sustainable Urban Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The buffer zone of Kunming. The blue area represents the built-up area of Kunming in 2019, and the surrounding buffer zones represent the equal area, double area, and triple area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Conversion process example diagram. The three lines with different colors in the figure above simulate SUHII changes in time of the three cities, respectively; the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis simulates SUHII, the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis of figure (<b>a</b>) simulates years, and the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis of figure (<b>b</b>) simulates the years transformed using the “fitting of its variation trend” method mentioned in <a href="#sec2dot5-sustainability-16-04819" class="html-sec">Section 2.5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Bar chart of SUHII in time for all cities; (<b>b</b>) probability density histogram of SHUII, where the left ordinate represents the probability of SUHII occurrence and the right ordinate represents the frequency; (<b>c</b>) statistical plots of SUHII greater than 0 and less than 0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Trends in SUHII variations for each city in the Central Yunnan City Cluster. The abscissa represents the year, and the ordinate represents the SUHII calculated from the temperature of the urban area and the suburban area each year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of SUHII change rate in the Central Yunnan urban agglomeration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Model fitting curve: (<b>a</b>) the result of direct fitting for all cities; (<b>b</b>) the horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the new time series data after fitting the SUHII trend of all cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Regression coefficient weighted average. The columns represent geographical factors, topographical factors, socioeconomic factors, land use change factors, and the degree of influence of industrial outcome factors on the changing trend of SUHII.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of temperature change and Sen slope statistics in four cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) The distribution of SUHII in different areas of construction, The horizontal coordinate A–J shows the built-up area size of all cities in all years and is evenly divided into ten categories, ranked from smallest to largest; (<b>b</b>) the changes in SUHII under the definition of different suburbs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Three slope estimation methods. The four graphs above (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent the interannual change in SUHII for four randomly selected cities and the trends fitted using different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>City pixel determination and SUHII accuracy verification of NTL. The red portion of (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) represents the urban boundaries of five cities within the urban cluster. The plot of points and lines for SUHII calculated using NTL-defined urban boundaries (<b>f</b>) versus the originally computed SUHII is shown below.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4754 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Patterns in the Urban Heat Island Effect of Several Contemporary and Historical Chinese “Stove Cities”
by Mengyu Huang, Shaobo Zhong, Xin Mei and Jin He
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 3091; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073091 - 8 Apr 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2075
Abstract
Various cities in China have been identified as “stove cities” either in contemporary or historical times, exposing residents to extremely high temperatures. Existing studies on the heat island effect in stove cities are not representative nationwide. The outdated nature of these studies also [...] Read more.
Various cities in China have been identified as “stove cities” either in contemporary or historical times, exposing residents to extremely high temperatures. Existing studies on the heat island effect in stove cities are not representative nationwide. The outdated nature of these studies also significantly diminishes the relevance of their findings. Thus, reassessing the urban heat island (UHI) effect of stove cities is necessary in the context of global climate change and urbanization. This study focuses on seven symbolic and geographically distributed stove cities in China, including Nanjing, Chongqing, Wuhan, Fuzhou, Beijing, Xi’an, and Turpan. Using land surface temperature (LST) data, this study investigates the summer heat island effect from 2013 to 2023 and analyzes changes in the spatial distribution of the heat island effect. This paper utilizes impervious surface data and urban clustering algorithms to define urban and suburban areas. It then examines the evolution and spatial distribution of surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) over time. Incorporating urbanization variables like population density and urban area, the study analyzes the main factors affecting the heat island effect from 2013 to 2018. We find that all cities continuously expand, with the annual average heat island effect intensifying over the years. With the exception of Beijing, the summer heat island or cool island effects in the remaining six cities show an overall intensification trend. From 2013 to 2018, SUHII has been primarily related to urban expansion and planning layout, with minimal impact from factors such as population density. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study areas. (<b>a</b>) Location of Shaanxi Province, Jiangsu Province, Fujian Province, Hubei Province, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Chongqing City, and Beijing City in China; (<b>b</b>) location of Xi’an City in Shaanxi province; (<b>c</b>) location of Nanjing City in Jiangsu province; (<b>d</b>) location of Fuzhou City in Fujian province; (<b>e</b>) location of Wuhan City in Hubei province; (<b>f</b>) location of Turpan in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Urban clustering algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in urban area expansion (2013–2018).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in spatiotemporal patterns of UHI in area of study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in annual mean temperature and other factors with changes in SUHII. (<b>a</b>) Changes in annual mean temperature and urban–suburban surface temperature, (<b>b</b>) urban expansion trends, and (<b>c</b>) changes in population density.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6797 KiB  
Article
Feasibility of Urban–Rural Temperature Difference Method in Surface Urban Heat Island Analysis under Non-Uniform Rural Landcover: A Case Study in 34 Major Urban Agglomerations in China
by Menglin Si, Na Yao, Zhao-Liang Li, Xiangyang Liu, Bo-Hui Tang and Françoise Nerry
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(7), 1232; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071232 - 31 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1430
Abstract
The urban–rural temperature difference is widely used in measuring surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII), where the accurate determination of rural background is crucial. However, traditionally, the entire permeable rural surface has been selected to represent the background temperature, leaving uncertainty about the [...] Read more.
The urban–rural temperature difference is widely used in measuring surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII), where the accurate determination of rural background is crucial. However, traditionally, the entire permeable rural surface has been selected to represent the background temperature, leaving uncertainty about the impact of non-uniform rural surfaces with multiple land covers on the accuracy of SUHII quantification. In this study, we proposed two quantifications of SUHII derived from the primary (SUHII1) and secondary (SUHII2) land types, respectively, which successively occupy over 40–50% of whole rural regions. The spatial integration and temporal variation of SUHII1 and SUHII2 were compared with the result from whole rural regions (SUHII) within 34 urban agglomerations (UAs) in China. The results showed that the SUHII1 and SUHII2 differed slightly with SUHII, and the correlation coefficients of SUHII and SUHII1/SUHII2 are generally above 0.9 in most (32) UAs. Regarding the long-term SUHII between 2003 and 2019, the three methods demonstrated similar seasonal patterns, although SUHII1 (or SUHII2) tended to overestimate or underestimate compared to SUHII. As for the multi-year integration at the regional scale, the day–night cycle and monthly variations of SUHII1 and SUHII were found to be identical for each geographical division separately, indicating that the spatiotemporal pattern revealed by SUHII is minimally affected by the diversity of rural landcover types. The findings confirmed the viability of the urban–rural LST difference method for measuring long-term regional SUHII patterns under non-uniform rural land cover types. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The spatial distribution of 34 Chinese urban agglomerations, indicating their principal (numbers in red color) and/or secondary (numbers in blue color) rural land types. The labels in each city center are their abbreviation name as defined in the main text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial variations of urban morphology of 34 Chinese urban agglomerations during 2003 and 2019. The boundaries were delineated with a city clustering algorithm based on LULC data (details in <a href="#sec2dot3-remotesensing-16-01232" class="html-sec">Section 2.3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Urban area and expanding rates for 34 Chinese urban agglomerations during 2003 and 2019. The changing rate was calculated by the Sen’s Slope at 95% significance intervals. The abbreviations of urban names in X axis corresponds to the definition in <a href="#sec2dot1-remotesensing-16-01232" class="html-sec">Section 2.1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of monthly daytime SUHIIs (<span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis) quantified by primary (SUHI<sub>1</sub>) and secondary (SUHI<sub>2</sub>) rural components, with traditional SUHII by whole rural region (<span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis). The U-x points in orange and blue colors represent the values of SUHI<sub>1</sub> and SUHI<sub>2</sub>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of monthly daytime SUHIIs (<span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis) quantified by primary (SUHI<sub>1</sub>) and secondary (SUHI<sub>2</sub>) rural components, with traditional SUHII by whole rural region (<span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis). The U-x points in orange and blue colors represent the values of SUHI<sub>1</sub> and SUHI<sub>2</sub>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Long-term trend of monthly daytime and nighttime SUHIIs during 2003 and 2019 in several of Northwest China’s urban agglomerations (mainly grasslands, croplands and barren in rural).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Long-term trend of monthly daytime SUHIIs between 2003 and 2019 in several of Southeast China’s urban agglomerations (mainly croplands and savannas in rural).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Long-term trend of monthly nighttime SUHIIs between 2003 and 2019 in several of Southeast China’s urban agglomerations (mainly croplands and savannas in rural).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Long-term trend of monthly daytime and nighttime SUHIIs between 2003 and 2019 in several of Southeast China’s urban agglomerations (mainly evergreen broadleaf forests and savannas in rural).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Day–night cycles of annual, summer and winter-averaged SUHII and SUHII<sub>1</sub> in China’s sub-regions. The solid lines denote the mean values, and the error bars represent its standard errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Variations of daytime and nighttime monthly SUHII (SUHII and SUHII<sub>1</sub>) in China’s sub-regions. The mean value is denoted in solid lines, and its standard errors are in shaded patches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Inter-annual variations of annual daytime and nighttime SUHII for China’s sub-regions over the period 2003–2019. The solid line depicts the mean value of each year, and its standard errors are in the shaded patch. The Sen’s slope is calculated at a 95% significant interval. The variations with significant linear trends are delineated with dashed lines in all sub-figures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Inter-annual variations of summer daytime and nighttime SUHII for China’s sub-regions over the period 2003–2019. The solid line depicts the mean value of each year, and its standard errors are in the shaded patch. The Sen’s slope is calculated at a 95% significant interval. The variations with significant trends are delineated with a dashed line. The variations with significant linear trends are delineated with dashed lines in all sub-figures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Inter-annual variations of winter daytime and nighttime SUHII for China’s sub-regions over the period 2003–2019. The solid line depicts the mean value of each year, and its standard errors are in the shaded patch. The Sen’s slope is calculated at a 95% significant interval. The variations with significant trends are delineated in the dashed line. The variations with significant linear trends are delineated with dashed lines in all sub-figures.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7957 KiB  
Article
Higher UHI Intensity, Higher Urban Temperature? A Synthetical Analysis of Urban Heat Environment in Urban Megaregion
by Jing Wang, Weiqi Zhou and Wenhui Zhao
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(24), 5696; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245696 - 12 Dec 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1687
Abstract
Urban heat islands (UHIs) aggravate urban heat stress and, therefore, exacerbate heat-related morbidity and mortality as global warming continues. Numerous studies used surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) to quantify the change in the UHI effect and its drivers for heat mitigation. However, [...] Read more.
Urban heat islands (UHIs) aggravate urban heat stress and, therefore, exacerbate heat-related morbidity and mortality as global warming continues. Numerous studies used surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) to quantify the change in the UHI effect and its drivers for heat mitigation. However, whether the variations in SUHII among cities can demonstrate the physical difference and fluctuation of the urban thermal environment is poorly understood. Here, we present a comparison study on the temporal trends of SUHII and LST in urban and nonurban areas in 13 cities of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) megaregion in China and further identify different types of changes in SUHII based on the temporal trends of land surface temperature (LST) in urban and nonurban areas from 2000 to 2020. We also measured the effect of the changes in four socioecological factors (i.e., population density, vegetation greenness (EVI), GDP, and built-up area) on the trends of SUHII to understand the dynamic interaction between the UHI effect and socioecological development. We found the following. (1) Nine out of thirteen cities showed a significant increasing trend in SUHII, indicating that the SUHI effects have been intensified in most of the cities in the BTH megaregion. (2) The spatial pattern of summer mean SUHII and LST in urban areas varied greatly. Among the 13 cities, Beijing had the highest mean SUHII, but Handan had the highest urban temperature, which suggests that a city with stronger SUHII does not necessarily have a higher urban temperature or hazardous urban thermal environment. (3) Four types of changes in SUHII were identified in the 13 cities, which resulted from different temporal trends of LST in urban areas and nonurban areas. In particular, one type of increasing trend of SUHII in seven cities resulted from a greater warming trend (increasing LST) in urban than nonurban areas (SUHII↑1), and another type of increasing trend of SUHII in Beijing and Chengde was attributed to the warming trends (increasing LST) in urban areas and the cooling trends (decreasing LST) in nonurban areas (SUHII↑2). Meanwhile, the third type of increasing trend of SUHII in Zhangjiakou was due to a greater cooling (decreasing LST) trend in nonurban areas than in urban areas (SUHII↑3). In contrast, three cities with a decreasing trend of SUHII were caused by the increase in LST in urban and nonurban areas, but the warming trend in nonurban areas was greater than in urban areas (SUHII↓1). (4) Among the relationship between the trend of SUHII (TrendSUHII) and the changes in socioecological factors (Trendpopulation density, TrendGDP per captica, TrendEVI, and Trendbuild-up area), a significantly positive correlation between TrendSUHII and TrendEVI indicated that the change in SUHII was significantly related to an increased rate of EVI. This is mainly because increased vegetation in nonurban areas would result in lower temperatures in nonurban areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area: the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) megaregion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Classification maps for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei megaregion from 2000 to 2020: (<b>a</b>) 2000, (<b>b</b>) 2005, (<b>c</b>) 2010, (<b>d</b>) 2015, (<b>e</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Urban areas mapping in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 showing Beijing as an example.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The spatial pattern of average LST of summer day of the years 2000 (<b>a</b>) and 2020 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The trend of socioecological factors for the 13 cities from 2000 to 2020: (<b>a</b>) mean EVI, (<b>b</b>) population density, (<b>c</b>) the percentage of BUA, (<b>d</b>) GDP per capita.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The spatial distribution of mean SUHII (<b>a</b>) and urban LST (<b>b</b>) in the summer daytime from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The trend of mean SUHII in the summer daytime from 2000 to 2020. ** Statistical significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05, * Statistical significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The trend of urban LST in the summer daytime from 2000 to 2020. ** Statistical significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05, * Statistical significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relationships between socioecological factors and mean SUHII: (<b>a</b>) mean EVI, (<b>b</b>) mean population density, (<b>c</b>) the percentage of BUA, (<b>d</b>) GDP per capita.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The correlations between the trends of socioecological factors and the rate of change in SUHII: (<b>a</b>) the trend of EVI, (<b>b</b>) the trend of population density, (<b>c</b>) the trend of GDP per capita.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The distribution of urban LST (<b>a</b>), nonurban LST (<b>b</b>), and SUHII (<b>c</b>) from 2000 to 2020 for all 13 cities.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 10377 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Long Time Series of Summer Surface Urban Heat Island under the Missing-Filled Satellite Data Scenario
by Jiamin Luo, Yuan Yao and Qiuyan Yin
Sensors 2023, 23(22), 9206; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229206 - 16 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1829
Abstract
Surface urban heat islands (SUHIs) are mostly an urban ecological issue. There is a growing demand for the quantification of the SUHI effect, and for its optimization to mitigate the increasing possible hazards caused by SUHI. Satellite-derived land surface temperature (LST) is an [...] Read more.
Surface urban heat islands (SUHIs) are mostly an urban ecological issue. There is a growing demand for the quantification of the SUHI effect, and for its optimization to mitigate the increasing possible hazards caused by SUHI. Satellite-derived land surface temperature (LST) is an important indicator for quantifying SUHIs with frequent coverage. Current LST data with high spatiotemporal resolution is still lacking due to no single satellite sensor that can resolve the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolutions and this greatly limits its applications. To address this issue, we propose a multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) coupling the comprehensive, flexible, spatiotemporal data fusion (CFSDAF) method to generate a high-spatiotemporal-resolution LST dataset. We then analyzed the SUHI intensity (SUHII) in Chengdu City, a typical cloudy and rainy city in China, from 2002 to 2022. Finally, we selected thirteen potential driving factors of SUHIs and analyzed the relation between these thirteen influential drivers and SUHIIs. Results show that: (1) an MGWR outperforms classic methods for downscaling LST, namely geographically weighted regression (GWR) and thermal image sharpening (TsHARP); (2) compared to classic spatiotemporal fusion methods, our method produces more accurate predicted LST images (R2, RMSE, AAD values were in the range of 0.8103 to 0.9476, 1.0601 to 1.4974, 0.8455 to 1.3380); (3) the average summer daytime SUHII increased form 2.08 °C (suburban area as 50% of the urban area) and 2.32 °C (suburban area as 100% of the urban area) in 2002 to 4.93 °C and 5.07 °C, respectively, in 2022 over Chengdu City; and (4) the anthropogenic activity drivers have a higher relative influence on SUHII than other drivers. Therefore, anthropogenic activity driving factors should be considered with CO2 emissions and land use changes for urban planning to mitigate the SUHI effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Application for Environmental Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The selected high-spatial-resolution LST data for generating and evaluating the predicted LST results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of testing the proposed method and monitoring daytime SUHI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of testing LST downscaling procedure based on MGWR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The delineation of urban and suburban areas over Chengdu City from 2002 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The 1000 m aggregated Landsat 9 LST on 21 April 2022 of (<b>a</b>) 100 m downscaled LST of vegetation, (<b>b</b>) 100 m downscaled LST of built-up area, (<b>c</b>) 100 m downscaled LST of brae soil, and (<b>d</b>) 100 m downscaled LST of water body.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distributions of LST: (<b>a</b>) 300 m downscaled LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 20 April 2013; (<b>b</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 20 April 2013; (<b>c</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 21 May 2013; (<b>d</b>) 300 m predicted LST on 21 May 2013; (<b>e</b>) observed LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 21 May 2013; (<b>f</b>) 300 m downscaled LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 16 April 2015; (<b>g</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 16 April 2015; (<b>h</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 10 July 2015; (<b>i</b>) 300 m predicted LST on 10 July 2015; (<b>j</b>) observed LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 10 July 2015; (<b>k</b>) 100 m downscaled LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 2 April 2018; (<b>l</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 2 April 2018; (<b>m</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 5 June 2018; (<b>n</b>) 100 m predicted LST on 5 June 2018; (<b>o</b>) observed LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 5 June 2018; (<b>p</b>) 100 m downscaled LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 21 April 2022; (<b>q</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>1</sub> on 21 April 2022; (<b>r</b>) 1000 m MOD11A1 at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 7 May 2022; (<b>s</b>) 100 m predicted LST on 7 May 2022; (<b>t</b>) observed LST at <span class="html-italic">t</span><sub>2</sub> on 7 May 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots of the relation between observed LST and predicted LST image for: (<b>a</b>) 21 May 2013, (<b>b</b>)10 July 2015, (<b>c</b>) 5 June 2018, and (<b>d</b>) 7 May 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the predicted LSTs using the proposed method and CFSDAF, FSDAF. (<b>a</b>) the coefficient of determination (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup>); (<b>b</b>) the root mean square error (RMSE); (<b>c</b>) the absolute average difference (AAD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distributions of 30-m predicted LST using the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of the summer averaged 30 m predicted LST using the proposed method from 2002 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Temporal changes of SUHII in the study area from 2002 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The relative influence of SUHI of the driving factors in Chengdu City from 2002 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The relative influence of SUHI of the population shift driving factors in Chengdu City from 2002 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The relative influence of SUHI of the natural land surfaces driving factors in Chengdu City from 2002 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The relative influence of SUHI of the climate driving factors in Chengdu City from 2002 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The relative influence of SUHI of the anthropogenic activity driving factors in Chengdu City from 2002 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Spatial and temporal changes in PD, POP, and GDP in Chengdu City from 2002 to 2019. (<b>a</b>) population density (PD); (<b>b</b>) population count (POP); (<b>c</b>) gross domestic product (GDP).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4077 KiB  
Article
Diurnal Variation in Urban Heat Island Intensity in Birmingham: The Relationship between Nocturnal Surface and Canopy Heat Islands
by Cong Wen, Ali Mamtimin, Jiali Feng, Yu Wang, Fan Yang, Wen Huo, Chenglong Zhou, Rui Li, Meiqi Song, Jiacheng Gao and Ailiyaer Aihaiti
Land 2023, 12(11), 2062; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112062 - 13 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1495
Abstract
Urban heat islands have garnered significant attention due to their potential impact on human life. Previous studies on urban heat islands have focused on characterizing temporal and spatial variations over longer periods of time. In this study, we investigated the urban heat island [...] Read more.
Urban heat islands have garnered significant attention due to their potential impact on human life. Previous studies on urban heat islands have focused on characterizing temporal and spatial variations over longer periods of time. In this study, we investigated the urban heat island (UHI) in Birmingham from September 2013 to August 2014 using higher temporal resolution SEVIRI satellite surface temperature data along with data from the Birmingham Urban Climate Laboratory (BUCL) meteorological station and the UK Meteorological Office meteorological station. Our aim was to characterize the diurnal variations in the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) and canopy urban heat island intensity (CUHII) and to explore their relationship under the influence of three factors (day/nighttime, season, and wind speed) using regression analysis. Our findings reveal that SUHII and CUHII exhibit relatively stable patterns at night but vary significantly during the day with opposite diurnal trends. In addition, SUHII and CUHII were more variable in spring and summer but less variable in winter. During the nighttime, SUHII represents CUHII with high confidence, especially during spring and summer, but less so during the cold season. In addition, SUHII represents CUHII with greater confidence under low-wind conditions. This study deepens our understanding of the diurnal dynamics of urban heat islands and the influence of atmospheric conditions on the relationship between surface and canopy heat islands in urban areas. The results of this study can be used for heat island studies in cities that lack high-precision observation networks and to guide sustainable urban development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Birmingham city weather station location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diurnal variations in SEVIRI LST, MODIS LST, and air temperature at BUCL on 3 September 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Correlation analysis of SEVIRI LST data with BUCL observation data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diurnal variation in SUHII throughout the year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diurnal variation in CUHII throughout the year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Linear and elliptical trends of SUHII and CUHII based on the daytime and nighttime: (<b>a</b>) daytime; (<b>b</b>) nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Linear and elliptical trends of SUHII and CUHII based on three wind speed conditions: (<b>a</b>) WS1, (<b>b</b>) WS2, and (<b>c</b>) WS3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Linear and elliptical trends of SUHII and CUHII based on the season: (<b>a</b>) spring, (<b>b</b>) summer, (<b>c</b>) autumn, and (<b>d</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop