[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,154)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Mann–Kendall tests

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 8692 KiB  
Article
Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Variability of Vegetation Coverage and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Source Region from 2000 to 2020
by Boyang Wang, Jianhua Si, Bing Jia, Xiaohui He, Dongmeng Zhou, Xinglin Zhu, Zijin Liu, Boniface Ndayambaza and Xue Bai
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4772; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244772 (registering DOI) - 21 Dec 2024
Abstract
As a vital conservation area for water sources in the Yellow River Basin, understanding the spatial-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage is crucial, along with the factors that affect it, to ensure ecological preservation and sustainable development of the Yellow River Source Region (YRSR). [...] Read more.
As a vital conservation area for water sources in the Yellow River Basin, understanding the spatial-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage is crucial, along with the factors that affect it, to ensure ecological preservation and sustainable development of the Yellow River Source Region (YRSR). In this paper, we utilized Landsat surface reflectance data from 2000 to 2020 using de-clouding and masking methods implementing the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform. We investigated spatial-temporal changes in vegetation coverage by combining the maximum value composite (MVC), the dimidiate pixel model (DPM), the Theil–Sen median slope, and the Mann–Kendall test. The influencing factors on vegetation coverage were quantitatively analyzed using a geographic detector, and future tendencies in vegetation coverage were predicted utilizing the Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) model. The outcomes suggested the following: (1) On the temporal scale, vegetation coverage exhibited a general upward trend between 2000 and 2020, with the YRSR showing a yearly growth rate of 0.23% (p < 0.001). In comparison to 2000, the area designated as having extremely high vegetation coverage increased by 19.3% in 2020. (2) Spatially, the central and southeast regions have higher values of vegetation coverage, whereas the northwest has lower values. In the study area, 75.5% of the region demonstrated a significant improvement trend, primarily in Xinghai County, Zeku County, and Dari County in the south and the northern portion of the YRSR; conversely, a notable tendency of degradation was identified in 11.8% of the area, mostly in the southeastern areas of Qumalai County, Chenduo County, Shiqu County, and scattered areas in the southeastern region. (3) With an explanatory power of exceeding 45%, the three influencing factors that had the biggest effects on vegetation coverage were mean annual temperature, elevation, and mean annual precipitation. Mean annual precipitation has been shown to have a major impact on vegetation covering; the interconnections involving these factors have increased the explanatory power of vegetation coverage’s regional distribution. (4) Predictions for 2030 show that the vegetation coverage is trending upward in the YRSR, with a notable recovery trend in the northwestern region. This study supplies a theoretical foundation to formulate strategies to promote sustainable development and ecological environmental preservation in the YRSR. Full article
12 pages, 3011 KiB  
Article
Geo-Statistical Characterization of Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall Variability in Semi-Arid Regions
by Mohammed Achite, Tommaso Caloiero, Muhammad Jehanzaib, Andrzej Wałęga, Alban Kuriqi and Gaetano Pellicone
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1519; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121519 - 19 Dec 2024
Abstract
In the Wadi Cheliff basin (Algeria), a 48-year (1971–2018) time series of annual maximum daily rainfall was studied to identify and quantify trends observed at 150 rain gauges. Initial trends in annual maximum daily rainfall were determined using the Mann–Kendall test, with a [...] Read more.
In the Wadi Cheliff basin (Algeria), a 48-year (1971–2018) time series of annual maximum daily rainfall was studied to identify and quantify trends observed at 150 rain gauges. Initial trends in annual maximum daily rainfall were determined using the Mann–Kendall test, with a significance level of 95%. The slope or increase/decrease in the annual maximum daily precipitation was assessed using the Theil–Sen estimator. A running trend analysis was then performed to quantify the effects of different time windows on trend detection. Finally, to assess the different spatial distribution of annual maximum daily precipitation during the observation period, spatial analysis was performed using a geo-statistical approach for the whole observation period and at different decades. The results showed a predominant negative trend in annual maximum daily rainfall (about 11% of rain gauges at a 95% significance level), mainly affecting the north-eastern area of the catchment. The spatial distribution of annual maximum daily rainfall showed high rainfall variability in the period of 1970–1980, with a decrease in the decades of 1980–1990 and 2010–2017 when the maximum values were more evenly distributed across the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of study area. Blue dots identify the precipitation stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Percentages of annual rainfall series present significant positive or negative trends, and spatial distribution of the stations shows significant precipitation trends.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of the running trend analysis for the annual regional mean series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Experimental variograms with different temporal segments: (<b>a</b>) the full-time series, (<b>b</b>) 1970–1980, (<b>c</b>) 1980–1990, (<b>d</b>) 1990–2000, (<b>e</b>) 2000–2010, and (<b>f</b>) 2010–2017. In the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis, distance is expressed in metres.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Experimental variograms with different temporal segments: (<b>a</b>) the full-time series, (<b>b</b>) 1970–1980, (<b>c</b>) 1980–1990, (<b>d</b>) 1990–2000, (<b>e</b>) 2000–2010, and (<b>f</b>) 2010–2017. In the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis, distance is expressed in metres.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of annual maximum precipitation (in mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatter plots between observed and estimated daily maximum precipitation values.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5946 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Spatiotemporal Variation in Precipitation on the Loess Plateau from 1961 to 2016
by Jiahui Wu, Hongbing Deng and Ran Sun
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 11119; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411119 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 205
Abstract
This study utilized annual precipitation data collected from 76 meteorological stations located on the Loess Plateau and its adjacent regions. It employed empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis, the Mann–Kendall trend test (M-K), and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) to investigate the spatial distribution patterns, [...] Read more.
This study utilized annual precipitation data collected from 76 meteorological stations located on the Loess Plateau and its adjacent regions. It employed empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis, the Mann–Kendall trend test (M-K), and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) to investigate the spatial distribution patterns, temporal trends, and periodicity of annual precipitation from 1961 to 2016. The results showed the following: (1) The long-term averages of annual rainfall on the Loess Plateau exhibited a general decline from the southeast to the northwest, with certain areas demonstrating a trend of reduction radiating outward from the central region. This precipitation regime was fundamentally governed by the interplay between geographic coordinates and topo-graphical characteristics. Nevertheless, this spatial distribution pattern is expected to undergo changes in the future. (2) Annual precipitation in the southern and eastern parts decreased significantly, while the western part reported the greatest increase, and thus the spatial variability of precipitation will decrease in the future. (3) Annual precipitation on the Loess Plateau generally has a period of about 4 years. The wavelet coherence analysis reveals that El Niño events, occurring over a brief 4-year interval, correlate with diminished precipitation patterns across the eastern and southern sectors of the Loess Plateau, consequently attenuating the precipitation’s spatial variability throughout the entire geographical domain. Therefore, in the future, when El Niño occurs, it is necessary to prevent droughts in the eastern and southern regions of the Loess Plateau. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of meteorological stations on the Loess Plateau (the dark points signify meteorological observation stations, while the contour lines indicate elevation in meters).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The primary mode of EOF decomposition of yearly precipitation on the Loess Plateau from 1961 to 2016 (the hue of the graph’s bars reflects the magnitude of the EOF value).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in the time coefficient EC of EOF decomposition of annual precipitation on the Loess Plateau (1961–2016) (the dashed line represents the Ec value, the blue solid line represents the 5-year moving average, and the red line represents the trend line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of annual precipitation on the Loess Plateau in 1964 (<b>a</b>) and 1998 (<b>b</b>). Contour lines represent annual precipitation, unit: mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The analysis of the continuous wavelet transform applied to the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) coefficients for annual precipitation on the Loess Plateau reveals significant insights. (The variations in the color bars indicate the magnitude of the wavelet power spectrum, while the thick black line denotes the threshold for the 5% significance test. The thin black line illustrates the influence cone curve, with any power spectrum data outside this curve being disregarded due to boundary effects.).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation trend of annual precipitation in the Loess Plateau during the period of 1961–2016, where the contour line is the Telson coefficient (mm/a), upward triangles represent an increase, downward triangles represent a decrease, red indicates a significant change (α = 0.1), and black represent no change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes in annual precipitation from 1961 to 2016 at 8 stations on the Loess Plateau. (The dashed line represents annual precipitation, the blue solid line represents the 5-year moving average, and the red line represents the trend line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Continuous wavelet analysis of annual precipitation at eight sites on the Loess Plateau (the change in the color bar represents the level of the wavelet power spectrum; the thick black lines indicate passing the 5% significance test; the thin black lines represent the influence cone curve, and the power spectrum outside the curve is not considered because of the boundary effect).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Continuous wavelet analysis of annual precipitation at eight sites on the Loess Plateau (the change in the color bar represents the level of the wavelet power spectrum; the thick black lines indicate passing the 5% significance test; the thin black lines represent the influence cone curve, and the power spectrum outside the curve is not considered because of the boundary effect).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Trend of the SOI from 1961 to 2016 (the dashed line represents annual precipitation, the blue solid line represents the 5-year moving average, and the red line represents the trend line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Wavelet continuous transform analysis of SOI from 1961 to 2016 (the change in the color bar represents the level of the wavelet power spectrum; the thick black line indicates passing the 5% significance test; the thin black line is the influence cone curve, and the power spectrum outside this curve is not considered because of the boundary effects).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The wavelet coherence between EC and SOI reveals temporal phase relationships. Significant correlations at the 5% level, validated against red noise, are demarcated by bold contour lines. Areas beyond the cone of influence, marked by fine black curves, are excluded from analysis due to edge effects. Directional indicators elucidate phase relationships as follows: rightward arrows (→) denote in-phase alignment (0°), leftward arrows (←) represent anti-phase correlation (180°), downward arrows (↓) indicate a 270° phase angle, and upward arrows (↑) signify a 90° phase angle. This phase relationship convention is maintained throughout subsequent figures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The wavelet coherence between annual precipitation at 8 stations of the Loess Plateau and SOI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>The wavelet coherence between annual precipitation at 8 stations of the Loess Plateau and SOI.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 9835 KiB  
Article
Application of a Modified Ecological Quality Monitoring Method in the Southeastern Hilly Region of China
by Yusheng Huang, Xinyue Fu, Jinming Sha and Eshetu Shifaw
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4731; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244731 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 244
Abstract
The southeastern hilly region of China is ecologically significant but highly vulnerable to climate change and human activities. This study developed a Modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index (MRSEI) using satellite imagery and Human Footprint data to assess ecological quality across 14 cities surrounding [...] Read more.
The southeastern hilly region of China is ecologically significant but highly vulnerable to climate change and human activities. This study developed a Modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index (MRSEI) using satellite imagery and Human Footprint data to assess ecological quality across 14 cities surrounding the Wuyi Mountains. We applied Sen’s slope analysis, the Mann–Kendall test, and spatial autocorrelation to evaluate spatiotemporal ecological changes from 2000 to 2020, and used partial correlation analysis to explore the drivers of these changes. The main findings are as follows: (1) Ecological quality generally improved over the study period, with significant year-to-year fluctuations. The eastern region, characterized by higher altitudes, consistently exhibited better ecological quality than the western region. The area of low-quality ecological zones significantly decreased, while Ji’an, Ganzhou, Heyuan, and Meizhou saw the most notable improvements. In contrast, urban areas experienced a marked decline in ecological quality. (2) The region is undergoing warming and wetting trends. Increased precipitation, especially in the western and northern regions, improved ecological quality, except in urban areas, where it heightened flood risks. Rising temperatures had mixed effects: they enhanced ecological quality in high-altitude areas (~516 m) but negatively impacted low-altitude regions (~262 m) due to intensified heat stress. (3) Although industrial restructuring reduced environmental pressure, rapid population growth and urban expansion created new ecological challenges. This study provides an innovative method for the ecological monitoring of hilly regions, effectively integrating human activity and climatic factors into ecological assessments. The findings offer valuable insights for sustainable development and ecological management in similar sensitive regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of the study area in China (<b>a</b>). The study area encompasses 14 prefecture-level cities spanning Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangxi, and Guangdong Provinces (<b>b</b>). The region features complex terrain, with the highest point being Mount Huanggang in Nanping, Fujian Province, at an elevation of 2160.8 m (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The linear fitting results of the three Remote Sensing Ecological Indices with the EI: the fitting results of the MRSEI with the EI show an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.66 (<b>a</b>); the fitting results of the CHEQ with the EI show an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.61 (<b>b</b>); and the fitting results of the RSEI with the EI show an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.52 (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The local ecological quality inversion results of the three Remote Sensing Ecological Indices: (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) are the inversion results of the MRSEI in two regions; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) are the inversion results of the CHEQ in two regions; and (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) are the inversion results of the RSEI in two regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The changes in the average annual MRSEI values and the percentage changes of the five grades. (<b>a</b>) The average annual MRSEI values in the study area, with a fitted line R<sup>2</sup> of 0.47 and <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05. (<b>b</b>) The percentage changes of the five MRSEI grades within the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The spatial distribution of MRSEI grades in the study area (2000–2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The Sen’s slope and the Mann–Kendall trend test results of the MRSEI in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>LISA Maps based on Anselin Local Moran’s I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Statistics of the number of grid cells in high and low clustering areas for six representative years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The distribution of trend changes in two climate factors. The distribution of precipitation trend changes (<b>a</b>). The distribution of temperature trend changes (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Partial correlation analysis results between climate factors and MRSEI. Partial correlation results between precipitation and MRSEI (<b>a</b>). Partial correlation results between precipitation and MRSEI (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Changes in human activity-related metrics from 2000 to 2020: population change curve (<b>a</b>); GDP change curve (<b>b</b>); GDP change curve for the three major industries (<b>c</b>); and building area change curve (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 7669 KiB  
Article
Climatic and Anthropogenic Influences on Long-Term Discharge and Sediment Load Changes in the Second-Largest Peninsular Indian Catchment
by Harshada Jadhav, Avinash M. Kandekar and Sumit Das
Water 2024, 16(24), 3648; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243648 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 293
Abstract
In recent decades, understanding how climate variability and human activities drive long-term changes in river discharge and sediment load has become a crucial field of research in fluvial geomorphology, particularly for South Asia’s densely populated and environmentally sensitive regions. This study analyses spatio-temporal [...] Read more.
In recent decades, understanding how climate variability and human activities drive long-term changes in river discharge and sediment load has become a crucial field of research in fluvial geomorphology, particularly for South Asia’s densely populated and environmentally sensitive regions. This study analyses spatio-temporal trends in water discharge (Qd) and sediment load (Qs) in the Krishna basin, Peninsular India’s second-largest catchment. Using nearly 50 years of daily discharge, sediment concentration, and rainfall data from the Central Water Commission (CWC) and India Meteorological Department (IMD), we applied Mann–Kendall, Pettitt tests, and double mass equations to detect long-term trends, abrupt changes, and the relative influence of climate and anthropogenic effects. Results showed a notable decline in the annual discharge, with 15 of 20 stations showing decreasing trends, especially along the Bhima, Ghataprabha, and lower Krishna rivers. The annual stream flow data showed a 53% decline in the mean Qd from 26.01 × 109 m3 year−1 before 2000 to 12.32 × 109 m3 year−1 after 2000 at the terminal station. Eight of ten gauging stations showed a significant decrease (p-value < 0.05) in their annual sediment load, with a 76% reduction across the Krishna basin after its changepoint in 1983. The Pettitt test identified a statistically significant downward shift in discharge at seven stations. Double mass plots indicate that anthropogenic factors, such as large-scale reservoirs and water diversion, are the main contributors, accounting for 82.7% of sediment decline, with climatic factors contributing 17.1%. The combined trend analysis and double mass plots confirm these findings, underscoring the need for further study of human impacts on the basin’s hydro-geomorphology. This study offers a clear and robust approach to quantifying the relative effects of climate and human activities, providing a versatile framework that can enhance understanding in similar studies worldwide. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water and Climate Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the Krishna basin and selected gauging stations. Refer to <a href="#water-16-03648-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> for the names of the gauging stations according to the numbers provided in this figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal patterns of water discharge for the gauging stations in the Krishna basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temporal patterns of the sediment load for the gauging stations in the Krishna basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial variability in (<b>a</b>) discharge and (<b>b</b>) sediment load at different gauging stations within the Krishna basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Abrupt shifts in annual water discharge identified at a 95% confidence level. The red and blue lines denote the average discharge before and after changepoint, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Abrupt shifts in annual sediment load identified at a 95% confidence level. The red and green lines represent average sediment load before and after changepoint, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Precipitation patterns and abrupt shifts in rainfall identified at a 95% confidence level in the Krishna basin. The red and green lines represent the average rainfall before and after the changepoint, respectively. For some stations, the green line is absent because no changepoint was detected using the Pettitt test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Double mass curve analysis of annual discharge and rainfall across Krishna basin stations. Different colours are provided to indicate sudden change in the curve pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Double mass curve analysis of annual sediment and rainfall across Krishna basin stations. Different colours are provided to indicate sudden change in the curve pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Double mass curve analysis of discharge and sediment load in the Krishna basin. Different colours are provided to indicate sudden change in the curve pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Double mass plot analysis of water and sediment load, differentiating pre- and post-change point periods using blue and red colours, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Cumulative storage capacity of all reservoirs in the Krishna basin and sediment load variation at Vijayawada from 1970 to 2005. (<b>b</b>) Association between cumulative storage capacity and annual sediment load at Vijayawada. (<b>c</b>) Decadal sediment load changes in the Krishna and its major tributaries.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 6795 KiB  
Article
Impact of Extreme Climate Indices on Vegetation Dynamics in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: A Comprehensive Analysis Utilizing Long-Term Dataset
by Hanchen Duan, Beiying Huang, Shulin Liu, Jianjun Guo and Jinlong Zhang
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2024, 13(12), 457; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13120457 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 369
Abstract
The Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) is crucial for global climate regulation and ecological equilibrium. However, the phenomenon of global climate warming has increased the frequency of extreme weather events on the QTP, exerting substantial effects on both regional and global ecological systems. This study [...] Read more.
The Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) is crucial for global climate regulation and ecological equilibrium. However, the phenomenon of global climate warming has increased the frequency of extreme weather events on the QTP, exerting substantial effects on both regional and global ecological systems. This study utilized long-term series NDVI and extreme climate indices to comprehensively evaluate the impact of extreme climatic changes on diverse vegetation types within the QTP. A variety of analytical methodologies, including trend analysis, a Mann–Kendall test, correlation analysis, and random forest importance ranking, were employed in this study. These methodologies were applied to investigate the distribution patterns and variation trends of diverse vegetation types and extreme climate indices. This comprehensive approach facilitated a detailed analysis of the responses of different vegetation types to interannual variability under extreme climatic conditions and enabled the assessment of the impact of extreme climate indices on these vegetation types. The findings have the following implications: (1) Except for forests, the annual NDVI for overall vegetation, meadows, steppes, deserts, and alpine vegetation in the QTP exhibits a significant upward trend (p < 0.01). Notably, meadows and deserts demonstrate the highest growth rates at 0.007/10y, whereas the annual NDVI of forests is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Substantial increases in vegetation were predominantly detected in the central and northeastern regions of the QTP, while significant decreases were mostly observed in the southeastern and western regions. The area exhibiting significant vegetation increase (38.71%) considerably surpasses that of the area with a significant decrease (14.24%). (2) There was a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the number of days associated with extreme cold temperature indices, including CSDI, DTR, FD, ID, TN10p, and TX10p. In contrast, indices related to extremely warm temperatures, such as GSL, WSDI, SU25, TN90p, TNn, TNx, TX90p, and TXx, exhibited a statistically significant increase (p < 0.01). The pronounced rise in minimum temperatures, reflected by fewer cold days, has notably contributed to climate warming. Although extreme precipitation events have become less frequent, their intensity has increased. Notable spatial variations in extreme precipitation were observed, although no consistent changing pattern emerged. (3) The annual NDVI for non-forest vegetation types showed a significant negative correlation with most extreme cold temperature indices and a significant positive correlation with extreme warm temperature indices. A significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) between annual NDVI and extreme precipitation indices is found only in steppe and desert ecosystems, with no such correlation observed in other vegetation types. Both correlation analysis and random forest methodologies underscore the impact of extreme climate indices on vegetation variations, with the random forest model exhibiting superior capability in capturing nonlinear relationships. In conclusion, global climate change is projected to result in a heightened frequency of extreme warm events. Although these conditions might temporarily enhance vegetation growth, they are also associated with numerous detrimental impacts. Therefore, it is imperative to enhance awareness and take proactive measures for early warning and prevention. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location and topographic map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution of NDVI (<b>a</b>) and vegetation types (<b>b</b>) in the QTP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temporal trends of interannual NDVI for various vegetation types on the QTP ((<b>a</b>) VQTP; (<b>b</b>) Forest; (<b>c</b>) Meadow; (<b>d</b>) Steppe; (<b>e</b>) Desert; (<b>f</b>) Alpine vegetation).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatiotemporal variation trends and statistical results of annual NDVI on the QTP from 1982 to 2020 (ESD, SD, ID, II, SI, and ESI; their specific meanings are detailed in <a href="#sec2dot3dot2-ijgi-13-00457" class="html-sec">Section 2.3.2</a>). (<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of Sen’s trend; (<b>b</b>) Spatial distribution of various trend levels; (<b>c</b>) Histogram of the pixel number with variation trends; (<b>d</b>) The percentage of various trend levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variations in annual trends and the distribution patterns of extreme temperature indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Variations in annual trends and the distribution patterns of extreme temperature indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Annual trends and distribution characteristics of extreme precipitation indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Annual trends and distribution characteristics of extreme precipitation indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Statistical analysis of the relationship between annual NDVI and extreme temperature indices across various vegetation types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial relationship between annual NDVI and extreme temperature indices on the QTP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Statistical analysis of the relationship between annual NDVI and extreme precipitation indices across various vegetation types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial relationship between annual NDVI and extreme precipitation indices on the QTP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Importance of extreme climate indices with regard to various vegetation types with the random forest model.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 13335 KiB  
Article
An Integrated Drought Index (Vapor Pressure Deficit–Soil Moisture–Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Dryness Index, VMFDI) Based on Multisource Data and Its Applications in Agricultural Drought Management
by Caiyun Deng, Li Zhang, Tianhe Xu, Siqi Yang, Jian Guo, Lulu Si, Ran Kang and Hermann Josef Kaufmann
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4666; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244666 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 400
Abstract
To more precisely monitor drought, a new remote sensing-based drought index, the Vapor Pressure Deficit–Soil Moisture–Sun-Induced Chlorophyll fluorescence Dryness Index (VMFDI), with a spatial resolution of 1 km based on vapor pressure deficit (VPD), soil moisture (SM), and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) data [...] Read more.
To more precisely monitor drought, a new remote sensing-based drought index, the Vapor Pressure Deficit–Soil Moisture–Sun-Induced Chlorophyll fluorescence Dryness Index (VMFDI), with a spatial resolution of 1 km based on vapor pressure deficit (VPD), soil moisture (SM), and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) data was constructed via a three-dimensional spatial distance model, and it was used to monitor dryness in the Yellow River Basin during 2003–2020. The spatiotemporal variations in and main factors of the VMFDI and agroecosystem responses were analyzed via the Theil–Sen median and Mann–Kendall tests and Liang–Kleeman information flow. The results revealed the following: (1) The VMFDI effectively monitors regional drought and is more sensitive than other indices like the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and GRACE drought severity index and single variables. (2) VMFDI values fluctuated seasonally in the Yellow River Basin, peaking in August and reaching their lowest in March. The basin becomes drier in winter but wetter in spring, summer, and autumn, with the middle and lower reaches, particularly Shaanxi and Gansu, being drought-prone. The VMFDI values in the agroecosystem were lower. (3) SM and VPD dominated drought at the watershed and agroecosystem scales, respectively. Key agroecosystem indicators, including greenness (NDVI), gross primary productivity (GPP), water use efficiency (WUE), and leaf area index (LAI), were negatively correlated with drought (p < 0.05). When VPD exceeded a threshold range of 7.11–7.17 ha, the relationships between these indicators and VPD shifted from positive to negative. The specific VPD thresholds in maize and wheat systems were 8.03–8.57 ha and 7.15 ha, respectively. Suggestions for drought risk management were also provided. This study provides a new method and high-resolution data for accurately monitoring drought, which can aid in mitigating agricultural drought risks and promoting high-quality agricultural development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location and land use of study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The concept of the VMFDI in a three-dimensional space model. A principle map of the VMFDI. The reference point D (1, 0, 0) is the driest point, where the value of the VMFDI is 0. Point W (0, 1, 1) is the wettest point, where the value of the VMFDI is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msqrt> <mn>3</mn> </msqrt> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Significant temporal correlations between VMFDI and (<b>a</b>) SPEI01, (<b>b</b>) SPEI03, (<b>c</b>) SPEI12, (<b>d</b>) DSI, (<b>e</b>) PRE, (<b>f</b>) VPD, (<b>g</b>) SM, and (<b>h</b>) SIF (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). In (<b>i</b>), R &gt; 0 means that VMFDI results are consistent with those of SPEI01, SPEI03, SPEI12, GRACE_DSI, PRE, VPD, SM, and SIF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A comparison of the drought monitoring ability of different drought indices. In this Figure, the red, light gray, and purple dashed lines are the drought thresholds for the GRACE-DSI, SPEI, and VMFDI, respectively (classified by <a href="#remotesensing-16-04666-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>). The light pink columns represent the actual observed drought events in the Yellow River Basin recorded in the Bulletin of Flood and Drought Disasters in China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation coefficients between the VMFDI and other indices in the Yellow River Basin (<b>a</b>) based on all monthly data and (<b>b1</b>–<b>b12</b>) for each month of data in the range of 2003~2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monthly spatiotemporal variations in the VMFDI values (1 km <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 1 km) of the Yellow River Basin from 2003 to 2020. (<b>a</b>) shows the distribution pattern of the multiyear mean value of the monthly VMFDI and the temporal series of the monthly VMFDI at the basin scale. In (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), the changes in VMFDI values and their significance from 2003 to 2020, respectively, are shown; an obvious increase or decrease represents a region of significant change (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The distribution and movement tracks of the annual and monthly drought centers in the Yellow River Basin identified by VMFDI anomalies and the gravity model. (<b>a</b>) is an overview map showing the location of the drought centers. In (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), the color dots represent the center of gravity of drought in different months or years, where drought is most likely to occur. The lines are the trajectory of the drought center. The standard deviational ellipses represent the change direction of drought.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A time series of monthly VMFDI, VPD, SM, SIF, and VMFDI anomalies in the agroecosystem of the Yellow River Basin from 2003 to 2020. In figure (<b>a</b>)., r represents the correlation between variables and * represents the level of significance (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The box diagram represents the value distribution of each variable. In figure (<b>b</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">V</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">l</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the difference between the VMFDI value in month <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> of year <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and the multiyear mean value in month <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The red bars represent the values below zero.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlations between the monthly VMFDI and crop growth status indicators in the agroecosystem of the Yellow River Basin from 2003 to 2020. The corresponding data for the agroecosystem (<b>a</b>), maize (<b>b</b>), and wheat (<b>c</b>) included data from January to December, April to September (the maize growth cycle), and March to June (wheat regreening to maturity) from 2003 to 2020, respectively. r is the correlation efficiency, and * indicates that there is a significant correlation with a <span class="html-italic">p</span> value less than 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Causalities between the monthly VMFDI and other corresponding variables. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> <mo>→</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the rate of the information flow from <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. * represents a 95% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Thresholds in the relationships between VPD and the NDVI, GPP, or LAI in various agroecosystems. The temporal ranges of the corresponding data in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) were 12 months (January to December), 6 months (April to September, which is the maize growing season), and 4 months (March to June, in which wheat regreens to maturity) from 2003 to 2020, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6758 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Observed Trends in Rainfall and Temperature Patterns in North-Eastern Nigeria
by Deborah Ishaku, Emmanuel Tanko Umaru, Abel Aderemi Adebayo, Ralf Löwner and Appollonia Aimiosino Okhimamhe
Climate 2024, 12(12), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12120219 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 489
Abstract
The present study offers a comprehensive evaluation of the monthly rainfall and temperature patterns across nine stations and fifty-nine points in North-Eastern Nigeria using NASA’s Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources data, spanning four decades (1981–2021). By employing the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and inverse [...] Read more.
The present study offers a comprehensive evaluation of the monthly rainfall and temperature patterns across nine stations and fifty-nine points in North-Eastern Nigeria using NASA’s Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources data, spanning four decades (1981–2021). By employing the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation, the researchers effectively detected and visualized trends in climate variables. The MK test results indicate contrasting rainfall trends, with notable decreases in Akko, Billiri, Maiduguri, Numan, and Yola, and increases in Gombe, Abadam, Biu, and Mubi. The trends in the maximum temperature were found to be statistically significant across all stations, showing a consistent increase, whereas the minimum temperature trends exhibited a slight but insignificant decrease. The application of the Theil–Sen slope estimator quantified these trends, providing nuanced insights into the magnitudes of changes in climate variables. The IDW results further corroborate the general trend of decreasing rainfall (z = −0.442), modest increases in the maximum temperature (z = 0.046), and a marginal decline in the minimum temperature (z = −0.005). This study makes an important contribution by advocating for the proactive dissemination of climate information. Given the evident climate shifts, particularly the increasing temperatures and fluctuating rainfall patterns, timely access to such information is crucial to enhancing climate resilience in the region. The rigorous statistical methods applied and the detailed spatial analysis strengthen the validity of these findings, making this study a valuable resource for both researchers and policymakers aiming to address climate variability in North-Eastern Nigeria. These research results may also be useful for understanding the climate variabilities in different parts of the world. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area showing nine (9) selected points of data collection represented as Local Government Areas (LGA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Total annual rainfall between 1991 and 2021 in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maximum temperature between 1991 and 2021 in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Minimum temperature between 1991 and 2021 in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mean annual rainfall—(<b>a</b>) 1981–1990, (<b>b</b>) 1991–2000, (<b>c</b>) 2001–2010, (<b>d</b>) 2011–2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Precipitation change over the years (1981 to 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mean annual maximum temperature—(<b>a</b>) 1981–1990, (<b>b</b>) 1991–2000, (<b>c</b>) 2001–2010, (<b>d</b>) 2011–2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Maximum temperature changes over the years (1981 to 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean annual minimum temperature (<b>a</b>) 1981–1990, (<b>b</b>) 1991–2000, (<b>c</b>) 2001–2010, (<b>d</b>) 2011–2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Minimum temperature change over the years (1981 to 2021).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 12892 KiB  
Article
Understanding Agricultural Water Consumption Trends in Henan Province: A Spatio-Temporal and Determinant Analysis Using Geospatial Models
by Yanbin Li, Yuhang Han, Hongxing Li and Kai Feng
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2253; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122253 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 508
Abstract
In the context of water scarcity, understanding the mechanisms influencing and altering agricultural water consumption can offer valuable insights into the scientific management of limited water resources. Using Henan Province as a case study, this research applies the Mann–Kendall test method, the spatial [...] Read more.
In the context of water scarcity, understanding the mechanisms influencing and altering agricultural water consumption can offer valuable insights into the scientific management of limited water resources. Using Henan Province as a case study, this research applies the Mann–Kendall test method, the spatial Markov transfer chain model, the optimal parameter geo-detector model, and the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition method to investigate the evolution characteristics of agricultural water consumption in Henan Province and its key influencing factors. The findings revealed the following: (1) Agricultural water consumption has shown a significant decline from 1999 to 2022. (2) According to observations, the stability of agricultural water consumption exceeds the spillover effect, and cross-border grade transfer is challenging. Moreover, this phenomenon is influenced by the neighboring regions. (3) The key influencing factors of added agricultural value are the sown area of food crops, total sown area, irrigated area, and average annual air temperature. (4) Among the decomposition effects on agricultural water consumption, the contribution of each decomposition effect to changes in agricultural water consumption and the role of spatial distribution exhibit notable differences. Overall, these findings provide theoretical references for the efficient use of agricultural water resources and sustainable development in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution of agricultural water consumption by Mann–Kendall test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-value results for each index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Key impact factor interactive detection results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution map of the direction of action of each decomposition variable of agricultural water consumption in Henan Province. (<b>a</b>) Agrometeorological stress effects; (<b>b</b>) Agrometeorological economic effects; (<b>c</b>) Scale effects in agricultural development; (<b>d</b>) Agricultural irrigation capacity effects; (<b>e</b>) Agricultural cropping structure effects; (<b>f</b>) Agricultural food security effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution map of the contribution of each decomposition variable of agricultural water consumption in Henan Province. (<b>a</b>) Agrometeorological stress effects; (<b>b</b>) Agrometeorological economic effects; (<b>c</b>) Scale effects in agricultural development; (<b>d</b>) Agricultural irrigation capacity effects; (<b>e</b>) Agricultural cropping structure effects; (<b>f</b>) Agricultural food security effects.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5356 KiB  
Article
Study on the Characteristics and Attribution Analysis of Runoff Changes in the Zuli River Basin of Northwest China
by Rui Zhang, Na Li, Xiaoxia Lu, Heping Shu, Haolin Li, Zhi Xu and Qiang Wang
Water 2024, 16(23), 3526; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233526 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 444
Abstract
The consequence of climatic change and anthropogenic environmental modifications is a notable diminution in runoff across arid and semi-arid regions. For the sustainable management of regional water resources, it is crucial to comprehend the impacts of climatic and anthropogenic factors on runoff patterns. [...] Read more.
The consequence of climatic change and anthropogenic environmental modifications is a notable diminution in runoff across arid and semi-arid regions. For the sustainable management of regional water resources, it is crucial to comprehend the impacts of climatic and anthropogenic factors on runoff patterns. The Zuli River was designated as the study area for this study, and the Mann–Kendall test, double cumulative curve method, slope change ratio of cumulative quantity method, and elasticity coefficient method were employed to identify mutation points and to quantify the relative impacts of climatic variation and human activities on runoff. The results revealed a statistically insignificant downward trend in mean annual precipitation, a significant declining trend in runoff, and an evident increasing trend in potential evapotranspiration and temperature between the years 1957 and 2019. The analysis revealed that the point of sudden change in runoff at Huining station occurred in 1992, whereas the mutation point at Guo Chengyi station was identified in 1985 and that at Jingyuan station in 1995. The contribution of climate change to runoff was found to range from 28.7% to 58.5%, while the contribution of human activities to runoff ranged from 41.5% to 71.3%, based on different methodologies. Therefore, human activities were recognized as the main factor affecting the variations in runoff within the Zuli River Basin, while climate change acts as a secondary contributor. The results of the study hold considerable importance for enhancing the scientific understanding of hydrological processes within the basin and for guiding regional water administration strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change Adaptation and Water Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Inter−annual variability of runoff from different hydrological stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Internal variation of hydro−meteorological factors: (<b>a</b>) precipitation, (<b>b</b>) ET<sub>0</sub>, and (<b>c</b>) temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>M−K mutation test: (<b>a</b>) Huining, (<b>b</b>) Guo Chengyi, and (<b>c</b>) Jingyuan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Precipitation–runoff double cumulative curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Accumulation curve of hydro−meteorological factors: (<b>a</b>) cumulative precipitation, (<b>b</b>) cumulative runoff, and (<b>c</b>) cumulative ET<sub>0</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of the quantitative results. DCC denotes the double cumulative curve method. OL’DEKOP, PIKE, and FU denote three assumptions of the elasticity coefficient method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>LUCC information of the Zuli River (<b>a</b>) 1980 (<b>b</b>) 2000 (<b>c</b>) 2015.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 35891 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Trends and Driving Factors of Cultivated Land Utilization Efficiency in Henan Province from 2000 to 2020
by Henggang Zhang, Chenhui Zhu, Tianyu Jiao, Kaiyue Luo, Xu Ma and Mingyu Wang
Land 2024, 13(12), 2109; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122109 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 670
Abstract
Amid persistent global food security challenges, the efficient utilization of cultivated land resources has become increasingly critical, as optimizing Cultivated Land Utilization Efficiency (CLUE) is paramount to ensuring food supply. This study introduced a cultivated land utilization index (CLUI) based on Fractional Vegetation [...] Read more.
Amid persistent global food security challenges, the efficient utilization of cultivated land resources has become increasingly critical, as optimizing Cultivated Land Utilization Efficiency (CLUE) is paramount to ensuring food supply. This study introduced a cultivated land utilization index (CLUI) based on Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) to assess the spatiotemporal variations in Henan Province’s CLUE. The Theil–Sen slope and the Mann–Kendall test were used to analyze the spatiotemporal variations of CLUE in Henan Province from 2000 to 2020. Additionally, we used a genetic algorithm optimized Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and a particle swarm optimization-based Random Forest (RF) model to assess the comprehensive in-fluence between topography, climate, and human activities on CLUE, in which incorporating Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values. The results reveal the following: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the CLUE in Henan province showed an overall upward trend, with strong spatial heterogeneity across various regions: the central and eastern areas generally showed decline, the northern region remained stable with slight increases, the western region saw significant growth, while the southern area exhibited complex fluctuations. (2) Natural and economic factors had notable impacts on CLUE in Henan province. Among these factors, population and economic factors played a dominant role, whereas average temperature exerted an inhibitory effect on CLUE in most parts of the province. (3) The influenced factors on CLUE varied spatially, with human activity impacts being more concentrated, while topographical and climatic influences were relatively dispersed. These findings provide a scientific basis for land management and agricultural policy formulation in major grain-producing areas, offering valuable insights into enhancing regional CLUE and promoting sustainable agricultural development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area: (<b>a</b>) location of Henan Province; (<b>b</b>) true-color satellite image of Henan Province; (<b>c</b>–<b>g</b>) typical cultivated land areas in central, northern, western, southern, and eastern regions of Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart of technical route.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Interannual changes in CLUI in Henan Province from 2000 to 2020. (<b>a</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2000; (<b>b</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2002; (<b>c</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2004; (<b>d</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2006; (<b>e</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2008; (<b>f</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2010; (<b>g</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2012; (<b>h</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2014; (<b>i</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2016; (<b>j</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2018; (<b>k</b>) Representing the spatial differences of CLUI in Henan Province in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Interannual change trend of CLUI index from 2000 to 2020: (<b>a</b>) represents the interannual change of the maximum value of CLUI, and (<b>b</b>) represents the interannual change of the average CLUI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>CLUI Sen-MK trend test from 2000 to 2020: (<b>a</b>) represents central Henan Province; (<b>b</b>) represents northern Henan Province; (<b>c</b>) represents western Henan Province; (<b>d</b>) represents central Henan Province; (<b>e</b>) represents southern Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variable importance ranking chart before and after optimization: (<b>a</b>) represents the variable importance ranking before ANN optimization; (<b>b</b>) represents the variable importance ranking after ANN optimization; (<b>c</b>) represents the variable importance ranking before RF optimization; (<b>d</b>) represents RF. Ranking of variable importance after optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Average variable importance ranking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Interannual changes of main factors: (<b>a</b>) represents the age change of the maximum value of Pop. Dens.; (<b>b</b>) represents the age change of the average value of Pop. Dens.; (<b>c</b>) represents the age change of the maximum value of GBR; (<b>d</b>) represents the age change of the average value of GBR; (<b>e</b>) represents the maximum SI value age change; (<b>f</b>) represents the SI average age change; (<b>g</b>) represents the Reg. Pop. maximum age change; (<b>h</b>) represents the Reg. Pop. average age change; (<b>i</b>) represents the GBE maximum age change; (<b>j</b>) represents the GBE average age change; (<b>k</b>) represents the age change of the maximum value of PC; (<b>l</b>) represents the age change of the average PC value; (<b>m</b>) represents the age change of the maximum value of Avg. Temp, and (<b>n</b>) represents the age change of the average value of Avg. Temp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Correlation analysis between main driving factors and CLUI: (<b>a</b>) represents the correlation analysis between Pop. Dens. and CLUE; (<b>b</b>) represents the correlation analysis between GBR and CLUE; (<b>c</b>) represents the correlation analysis between SI and CLUI; (<b>d</b>) represents the correlation analysis between Reg. Pop. and CLUI; (<b>e</b>) represents the correlation analysis between GBE and CLUI; (<b>f</b>) represents the correlation analysis between PC and CLUI; (<b>g</b>) represents the correlation analysis between Avg. Temp and CLUI.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 14921 KiB  
Article
Estimating the Effects of Climate Fluctuations on Precipitation and Temperature in East Africa
by Edovia Dufatanye Umwali, Xi Chen, Brian Odhiambo Ayugi, Richard Mumo, Hassen Babaousmail, Dickson Mbigi and David Izere
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1455; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121455 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 468
Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled models from CMIP6 experiments (hereafter; NEX-GDDP-CMIP6) in reproducing observed precipitation and temperature across East Africa (EA) from 1981 to 2014. Additionally, climate changes were estimated under various emission scenarios, namely [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled models from CMIP6 experiments (hereafter; NEX-GDDP-CMIP6) in reproducing observed precipitation and temperature across East Africa (EA) from 1981 to 2014. Additionally, climate changes were estimated under various emission scenarios, namely low (SSP1-2.6), medium (SSP2-4.5), and high (SSP5-8.5) scenarios. Multiple robust statistics metrics, the Taylor diagram, and interannual variability skill (IVS) were employed to identify the best-performing models. Significant trends in future precipitation and temperature are evaluated using the Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator tests. The results highlighted IPSL-CM6A-LR, EC-Earth3, CanESM5, and INM-CM4-8 as the best-performing models for annual and March to May (MAM) precipitation and temperature respectively. By the end of this century, MAM precipitation and temperature are projected to increase by 40% and 4.5 °C, respectively, under SSP5-8.5. Conversely, a decrease in MAM precipitation and temperature of 5% and 0.8 °C was projected under SSP2-4.5 and SSP1-2.6, respectively. Long-term mean precipitation increased in all climate scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5), with near-term MAM precipitation showing a 5% decrease in Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, and some parts of Tanzania. Under the SSP5-8.5 scenario, temperature rise exceeded 2–6 °C in most regions across the area, with the fastest warming trend of over 6 °C observed in diverse areas. Thus, high greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenarios can be very harmful to EA and further GHG control is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Techniques, Instruments, and Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of EA within longitude 28°00′00″ to 42°00′00″ E and latitude 12°00′00″ S to 5°00′00″ N with topographical distribution. (<b>b</b>) The relative location of EA over Africa is depicted on the top right insert of the African map with red color. The bottom right insert depicts the legend and color bar for the EA map (left column).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Long-term mean over EA during 1981–2014 (<b>a</b>) precipitation (units: mm) showing blue for CMIP6 models and green for MME and CRU observations and (<b>b</b>) temperature (units: °C) showing red for CMIP6 models and yellow for MME and CRU observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distributions of (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) observed precipitation (units: mm), (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) MME simulated precipitation (units: mm), and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) biases in MME simulation compared to the observation (simulation minus observation, units: mm) for the period 1981–2014. The panels progress from the left to the right, representing annual and MAM, respectively. Note that the color bar scales vary across the panels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distributions of (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) observed temperature (units: °C), (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) MME simulated temperature (units: °C), and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) biases in MME simulation compared to the observation (simulation minus observation, units: mm) for the period 1981–2014. The panels progress from the left to the right, representing annual and MAM, respectively. Note that the color bar scales vary across the panels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Taylor diagrams comparing CMIP6 observations (1981–2014) for (<b>a</b>) annual precipitation; (<b>b</b>) annual temperature; (<b>c</b>) MAM precipitation; (<b>d</b>) MAM temperature. Red represents CMIP6 models, blue lines indicate the correlation coefficient, green lines show RMSD and black lines represent the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interannual variability skill score (IVS) of the CMIP6 models for both annual and MAM, (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) precipitation, and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) temperature over EA. Blue represents CMIP6 models for precipitation, while red represents CMIP6 models for temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Time series of the annual mean precipitation and temperature from the best-performing models under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios over EA. The blue and red shadings are the corresponding model spread about the MME for the near (2031–2065) and far (2066–2100) terms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Time series of the MAM mean precipitation and temperature from the best-performing models under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios over EA. The blue and red shadings are the corresponding model spread about the MME for the near (2031–2065) and far (2066–2100) terms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distributions of changes in annual (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and MAM (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) precipitation (unit: %) in the near-term (2031–2065) and far-term (2066–2100) relative to historical 1981–2014 over EA under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of changes in annual (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and MAM (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) temperature (unit: °C) in the near-term (2031–2065) and far-term (2066–2100) relative to historical 1981–2014 over EA under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Projected spatial trends of annual (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and MAM (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) precipitation (unit: mm/year) relative to historical under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 respectively over EA. The black dots show changes that are statistically significant with a 95% confidence level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Projected spatial trends of annual (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and MAM (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) temperature (unit: ℃) relative to historical under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5, respectively, over EA. The black dots show changes that are statistically significant with a 95% confidence level.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8627 KiB  
Article
Space-Time Variability of Maximum Daily Rainfall in Piura River Basin in Peru Related to El Niño Occurrence
by Marina Farias de Reyes, Eduardo Chávarri-Velarde, Valeria Cotrina, Pierina Aguilar and Laura Vegas
Water 2024, 16(23), 3452; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233452 - 30 Nov 2024
Viewed by 561
Abstract
This study analyzes hydrometeorological data (1950–2023) to examine the signatures of El Niño and La Niña events and assess their impact on rainfall distribution in the Piura Region, Peru. Using data from 23 stations, high-resolution gridded rainfall datasets (PISCO), and oceanic–atmospheric indices we [...] Read more.
This study analyzes hydrometeorological data (1950–2023) to examine the signatures of El Niño and La Niña events and assess their impact on rainfall distribution in the Piura Region, Peru. Using data from 23 stations, high-resolution gridded rainfall datasets (PISCO), and oceanic–atmospheric indices we investigated the frequency, intensity, and spatial variability of these events in the Piura River Basin (PRB). Return periods for very strong El Niño and La Niña events are 25 and 19 years, respectively, compared to 2 years for neutral conditions. Over the past 30 years, the recurrence of Coastal El Niño has significantly increased. This increased frequency contributes to the global rise in El Niño events, reducing the return period for very strong events from 5.2 to 3.4 years. This rise correlates with an increase in maximum daily precipitation across the basin centered in the middle PRB during El Niño years. Future rainfall projections, based on 20 CMIP6 GCMs under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, suggest continued intensification of rainfall events. These findings highlight the necessity of incorporating El Niño variability into infrastructure design, water resource management, and climate adaptation strategies to mitigate the impacts of these increasingly frequent and severe events in the PRB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Digital elevation model of geographic location, 13 hydrologic units (HUs), and the three subbasins of the Piura River Basin: upper, middle, and lower basin. Also shown is the NOAA Niño 1 + 2 monitoring region (0°–10° S and 90° W–80° W).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Land cover and (<b>b</b>) soil types in Piura River Basin across the 13 hydrologic units (HUs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Piura River Basin (PRB) and Chira River Basin (CRB) with the hydrometeorological stations evaluated for El Niño analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Intensity index of global and Coastal El Niño/La Niña events in Piura region. The pale-colored bars indicate coastal events, El Niño (CEN) and La Niña (CLN), while the dark ones represent global events, El Niño (GEN) and La Niña (GLN).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mann–Kendall (MK) trend test results for rainfall on (<b>a</b>) maximum daily, (<b>b</b>) maximum monthly, and (<b>c</b>) annual scale in the SENAMHI network stations of the three subbasins of Piura River Basin signed with numbers according to <a href="#water-16-03452-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>. Full triangles (empty circles) represent stations with (non) significant trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cusum test results for rainfall on a (<b>a</b>) maximum daily, (<b>b</b>) maximum monthly, and (<b>c</b>) annual scale in the SENAMHI network stations of the three subbasins of Piura River Basin. Full color (empty) symbols represent the stations with (without) statistically significant change and with later years (don’t) showing increased rainfall levels. The red line represents the year 1994 as the average year for some change across all three timescales.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mann–Kendall trend test results for maximum daily rainfall in the hydrological units (HU) of the three subbasins of Piura River Basin: (<b>a</b>) PISCO gridded dataset (<b>above</b>) and the Historical GCM ensemble (<b>below</b>), and (<b>b</b>) GCM projections for SSP2-4.5 (<b>above</b>) and SSP5-8.5 (<b>below</b>). Full triangles (empty circles) represent HUs with significant (non-significant) trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cusum test results for maximum daily rainfall from (<b>a</b>) PISCO gridded dataset and GCM: historic, and (<b>b</b>) SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 predictions in the hydrological units (HUs) of the three subbasins of Piura River Basin. Full color (empty) symbols represent the HUs with significant (non-significant) change and with later years (don’t) showing increased rainfall levels. Red line represents average years for some change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mann–Kendall (MK) trend test and Sen’ slope results for rainfall at (<b>a</b>) network stations on a maximum daily, maximum monthly, and annual scale. (<b>b</b>) Hydrological units for PISCO gridded dataset and GCMs. The height of the bars represents the estimation of Sen’s slope, while their appearance indicates the significance of the MK test: full color (empty) bars represent (non) statistically significant MK trend test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of maximum daily rainfall in Piura River Basin for the complete series (<b>a</b>), the past 30 years (<b>b</b>), the recent 30 years (<b>c</b>), the statistical indicators (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), and category of EN/LN events (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>). Dashed black lines and labels are isohyets, red borderlines and numbers correspond to hydrological units, green line is Piura River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Values of rainfall in hydrological units of the Piura River Basin. Left side, main statistics, and right side, category of EN/LN events, for (<b>a</b>) maximum daily rainfall, (<b>b</b>) maximum monthly rainfall, and (<b>c</b>) annual rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Average values of rainfall during El Niño events in hydrological units of the Piura River Basin for (<b>a</b>) Global El Niño and (<b>b</b>) Coastal El Niño.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8662 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Vegetation Vulnerability in the Haihe River Basin Under Compound Heat and Drought Stress
by Hui Yin, Fuqing Bai, Huiming Wu, Meng Yan and Shuai Zhou
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10489; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310489 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 501
Abstract
With the intensification of global warming, droughts and heatwaves occur frequently and widely, which have a serious impact on the healthy growth of vegetation. The challenge is to accurately characterize vegetation vulnerability under compound heat and drought stress using correlation-based methods. This article [...] Read more.
With the intensification of global warming, droughts and heatwaves occur frequently and widely, which have a serious impact on the healthy growth of vegetation. The challenge is to accurately characterize vegetation vulnerability under compound heat and drought stress using correlation-based methods. This article uses the Haihe River Basin, an ecologically sensitive area known for experiencing droughts nine out of ten years, as an example. Firstly, using daily precipitation and maximum temperature data from 38 meteorological stations in the basin from 1965 to 2019, methods such as univariate linear regression and the Mann–Kendall mutation test were employed to identify the temporal variation patterns of meteorological elements in the basin. Secondly, the Pearson correlation coefficient and other methods were applied to determine the most likely months for compound dry and hot events, and the joint distribution pattern and recurrence period of concurrent high temperature and intense drought events were explored. Finally, a vegetation vulnerability assessment model based on Vine Copula in compound dry and hot climates was constructed to quantify the relationship of the response of watershed vegetation to different extreme events (high temperature, drought, and compound dry and hot climates). The results indicated that the basin’s precipitation keeps decreasing, evaporation rises, and the supply–demand conflict grows more severe. The correlation between the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Temperature Index (STI) is strongest at the 3-month scale from June to August. Meanwhile, in most areas of the basin, the Standardized Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (sNDVI) is positively correlated with the SPI and negatively correlated with the STI. Compared to a single drought or high-temperature event, compound dry and hot climates further exacerbate the vegetation vulnerability of the Haihe River Basin. In compound dry and hot climates, the probability of vegetation loss in June, July, and August is as high as 0.45, 0.32, and 0.38, respectively. Moreover, vegetation vulnerability in the southern and northwestern mountainous areas of the basin is higher, and the ecological risk is severe. The research results contribute to an understanding of the vegetation’s response to extreme climate events, aiming to address terrestrial ecosystem risk management in response to climate change. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location, meteorological stations, and spatial distribution of water systems in the Hai River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Research flow chart of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The trend test results for annual precipitation and annual average temperature in the watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The results of the variability test for the annual precipitation and annual average temperature in the watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Evolutionary patterns of the multi-scale (1–12 months) meteorological drought time history based on the SPI (blue represents a humid climate, while red indicates a dry climate. The same color appearing in consecutive periods signifies the duration of either drought or humidity).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of the correlation analysis between the SPI at multiple scales (1–12 months) and STI at the 1-month scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Identification results for the optimal marginal distribution functions for the 3-month SPI and 1-month STI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The optimal Copula functions for each station in the Haihe River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Joint cumulative probability distributions of the 3-month-scale SPI and 1-month-scale STI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Joint return period of the 3-month-scale SPI and 1-month-scale STI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution of correlation coefficients between the SPEI, STI, and sNDVI on a 3-month time scale from June to August in the Haihe River Basin (CC stands for correlation coefficient).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Probability distribution of vegetation loss in response to drought, high temperatures, and compound dry and hot climates in the Haihe River Basin from June to August (PVL stands for the probability of vegetation loss).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 4915 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Ecological Quality in a Typical Dryland of Northern China Driven by Climate Change and Human Activities
by Shuai Li, Junliang Gao, Pu Guo, Ge Zhang, Yu Ren, Qi Lu, Qinwen Bai and Jiahua Lu
Plants 2024, 13(23), 3341; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233341 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 418
Abstract
With the intensification of climate change and anthropogenic impacts, the ecological environment in drylands faces serious challenges, underscoring the necessity for regionally adapted ecological quality evaluation. This study evaluates the suitability of the original Remote Sensing Ecological Index (oRSEI), modified RSEI (mRSEI), and [...] Read more.
With the intensification of climate change and anthropogenic impacts, the ecological environment in drylands faces serious challenges, underscoring the necessity for regionally adapted ecological quality evaluation. This study evaluates the suitability of the original Remote Sensing Ecological Index (oRSEI), modified RSEI (mRSEI), and adapted RSEI (aRSEI) in a typical dryland region of northern China. Spatio-temporal changes in ecological quality from 2000 to 2022 were analyzed using Theil–Sen median trend analysis, the Mann–Kendall test, and the Hurst exponent. Multiple regression residual analysis quantified the relative contributions of climate change and human activities to ecological quality changes. Results showed that (1) the aRSEI was the most suitable index for the study area; (2) observed changes exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity, with improvements generally in the inner areas of the Yellow River and declines in the outer areas; and (3) changes in ecological quality were primarily driven by climate change and human activities, with human activities dominating from 2000 to 2011 and the influence of climate change increasing from 2012 to 2022. This study compares the efficacy of RSEIs in evaluating dryland ecological quality, identifies spatio-temporal change patterns, and elucidates driving mechanisms, offering scientific evidence and policy recommendations for targeted conservation and restoration measures to address future changes in dryland regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spatial distribution of and differences in three indices in 2022. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>): Spatial distribution of the oRSEI, aRSEI, and mRSEI, respectively. (<b>d</b>) Spatial differences between the oRSEI and aRSEI. (<b>e</b>) Spatial differences between the oRSEI and mRSEI. Note: SL: significantly low; OL: obviously low; LL: slightly low; NC: no change; LH: slightly high; OH: obviously high; SH: significantly high.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Violin plots of oRSEI, aRSEI, and mRSEI from 2000 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The distribution (<b>a</b>) and classification (<b>b</b>) of ecological quality in the study area in 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in (<b>a</b>) and area transition matrix of (<b>b</b>) ecological quality levels from 2000 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time series trend of ecological quality, Mann–Kendall significance test, and Mann–Kendall mutation test in the significant-change area. (<b>a</b>) Theil–Sen median trend analysis from 2000 to 2022. (<b>b</b>) Theil–Sen median trend analysis and Mann–Kendall significant test from 2000 to 2022. (<b>c</b>) Mann–Kendall mutation test in the significant-improvement areas. (<b>d</b>) Mann–Kendall mutation test in the significant-decline areas. Note: UF: forward trend statistical value; UB: backward trend statistical value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hurst exponent (<b>a</b>) and future trends (<b>b</b>) in the study area. Note: CD: continuous decline, ITD: improvement to decline, ST: stable, DTI: decline to improvement, CI: continuous improvement, UN: uncertain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of climate change and human activity contributions to ecological quality change in significant-change areas. (<b>a</b>) Climate change contribution in the significant-improvement areas. (<b>b</b>) Human activity contribution in the significant-improvement areas. (<b>c</b>) Climate change contribution in the significant-decline areas. (<b>d</b>) Human activity contribution in the significant-decline areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial pattern of and changes in climate factors. (<b>a</b>) Spatial pattern of annual precipitation. (<b>b</b>) Spatial pattern of annual mean temperature. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Changes in annual precipitation, annual mean temperature, and potential evapotranspiration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Overview of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Location of the study area. (<b>b</b>) ArcGIS online map (World Imagery). (<b>c</b>) Land use map in 2020 (GlobeLand30).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Technical workflow.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop