Search Results (31)

The mountainous Samian Watershed hosts important rivers recently, significantly triggered by fast and unplanned urbanization, population growth, environmentally hazardous industrialization, and inappropriate dam construction. Nonetheless, this watershed has not yet been evaluated through the lens of river restoration. Therefore, this study aims (1) to apply the River Restoration Index (RRI), (2) to assess the significance of each river restoration criterion and sub-index, and (3) to identify priority hotspots for immediate restoration efforts across 27 sub-watersheds in this case study. First, we built a database containing meteorological, hydrological, land use, physiographic, soil, and economic data. Then, we calculated the general state of the watershed (GSW), connectivity (Con), riverbank conditions (RbC), and hydraulic risk reduction (HRR) sub-indices to develop a multi-domain RRI. Finally, the MEREC-ORESTE hybrid method supported sustainable government planning. The findings reveal significant environmental issues, notably in sanitation conditions, transversal connectivity, and urban encroachment on riverbanks. Sanitation risks were high throughout the watershed, while other eco-environmental risks varied across regions. The weights of 0.36, 0.16, 0.32, and 0.16 were assigned for GSW, Con, RbC, and HRR, respectively, highlighting the importance of GSW and RbC in river restoration activities. Priority management areas (with RRI below 0.50) cover 78% of the watershed. Full article

A resilient innovation ecosystem is an important guarantee for enhancing industrial competitiveness. Knowledge spillover is the key driving force to enhance system resilience. Firstly, we use the MEREC-CoCoSo method to calculate the resilience level of the integrated circuit (IC) innovation ecosystem and analyze the evolution trajectory of the resilience before and after the emergence of the “stuck-neck” problem. Secondly, based on the panel data of 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) in China from 2011 to 2021, this paper analyzes the mechanism of the impact of intra-regional knowledge spillovers on the resilience of IC innovation ecosystems using the fixed-effect model and analyzes the spatial effect of inter-regional knowledge spillovers on the resilience of innovation ecosystems using the spatial Durbin model under the human capital matrix. Finally, we analyze the regulating role of contractual and relational governance mechanisms and try to open the “black box” of governance. The result shows the following: (1) The polarization of innovative ecosystem resilience of integrated circuits is gradually increasing, with strong spatial agglomeration, high–high agglomeration, low–low agglomeration, and low–high dispersion, and there is an obvious “matthew effect” and “siphon effect”. (2) Both intra- and inter-regional knowledge spillovers contribute significantly to the resilience of IC innovation ecosystems. The contractual governance mechanism can effectively enhance the impact of knowledge spillovers on the resilience of innovation ecosystems in the region, and the relational governance mechanism has a positive impact on the resilience of innovation ecosystems in neighboring regions. (3) Heterogeneity results show that knowledge spillovers within the Pan-PRD region have a significant positive impact on innovation ecosystem resilience. Knowledge spillovers between regions with low innovation capacity have a double effect on innovation ecosystem resilience, and knowledge spillovers between regions with “talent highlands” have a facilitating effect on innovation ecosystem resilience. Accordingly, policy recommendations are put forward to open up channels for innovation knowledge spillover, realize effective allocation of innovation resources, and optimize the system of innovation talents. Full article

Load balancing between required power demand and the available generation capacity is the main task of demand response for a smart grid. Matching between the objectives of users and utilities is the main gap that should be addressed in the demand response context. In this paper, a multi-user optimal load scheduling is proposed to benefit both utility companies and users. Different objectives are considered to form a multi-objective artificial hummingbird algorithm (MAHA). The cost of energy consumption, peak of load, and user inconvenience are the main objectives considered in this work. A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method is considered to select the dominance solutions. This approach is based on the removal effects of criteria (MERECs) and is utilized for deriving appropriate weights of various criteria. Next, the Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method is used to find the best solution of load scheduling from a set of Pareto front solutions produced by MAHA. Multiple pricing schemes are applied in this work, namely the time of use (ToU) and adaptive consumption level pricing scheme (ACLPS), to test the proposed system with regards to different pricing rates. Furthermore, non-cooperative and cooperative users’ working schemes are considered to overcome the issue of making a new peak load time through shifting the user load from the peak to off-peak period to realize minimum energy cost. The results demonstrate 81% cost savings for the proposed method with the cooperative mode while using ACLPS and 40% savings regarding ToU. Furthermore, the peak saving for the same mode of operation provides about 68% and 64% for ACLPs and ToU, respectively. The finding of this work has been validated against other related contributions to examine the significance of the proposed technique. The analyses in this research have concluded that the presented approach has realized a remarkable saving for the peak power intervals and energy cost while maintaining an acceptable range of the customer inconvenience level. Full article

This study tackles the challenge of identifying optimal investment sectors amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which are often complex and conflicting. This research aims to effectively evaluate and prioritize ten investment sectors based on twelve ESG criteria by integrating expert evaluations with two advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Three expert teams assessed each sector’s performance based on these criteria using fuzzy logic to manage uncertainties in expert judgments. The MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) identified biodiversity and land use as the most critical factor, while transparency and disclosure was least significant. The AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization) method was further used to rank the ten alternative sectors, with impact investing funds emerging as the top choice, followed by renewable energy and sustainable responsible investment funds. Conversely, ESG-compliant stocks, ESG-focused exchange-traded funds, and ESG-focused real estate investment trusts ranked the lowest. The study’s findings were validated through comparisons with other MCDM tools and sensitivity analysis, confirming the robustness of the proposed model. This research offers a valuable framework for investors looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their decision-making, promoting sustainable and responsible investing practices. Full article

In terms of both economy and sustainability, rural areas can greatly benefit from adopting E-commerce. The Chinese government is currently devoting significant efforts to developing agricultural E-commerce. However, one of the most significant problems is the lack of effective tools for evaluating regional potentials in this regard, possibly leading to inappropriate policymaking, investment allocation, and regional planning. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel and effective method for evaluating regional potentials for agricultural E-commerce development, integrating the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC), Heronian mean operator, and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method. The method’s effectiveness is then tested and confirmed in the Chinese city of Yibin through an evaluation of its ten regions. The results suggest that such a method is robust, objective, and able to consider indicator interactions effectively. By applying this method, regional agricultural E-commerce development potentials can be thoroughly evaluated and ranked. This study contributes to the literature by providing new analytical techniques for agricultural studies, as well as by supporting political and investment decision-making for governments and E-commerce practitioners in the agriculture sector. Full article

When using multi-criteria decision-making methods in applied problems, an important aspect is the determination of the criteria weights. These weights represent the degree of each criterion’s importance in a certain group. The process of determining weight coefficients from a dataset is described as an objective weighting method. The dataset considered here contains quantitative data representing measurements of the alternatives being compared, according to a previously determined system of criteria. The purpose of this study is to suggest a new method for determining objective criteria weights and estimating the proximity of the studied criteria to the centres of their groups. It is assumed that the closer a criterion is to the centre of the group, the more accurately it describes the entire group. The accuracy of the description of the entire group’s priorities is interpreted as the importance, and the higher the value, the more significant the weight of the criterion. The Centroidous method suggested here evaluates the importance of each criterion in relation to the centre of the entire group of criteria. The stability of the Centroidous method is examined in relation to the measures of Euclidean, Manhattan, and Chebyshev distances. By slightly modifying the data in the original normalised data matrix by 5% and 10% 100 and 10,000 times, stability is examined. A comparative analysis of the proposed Centroidous method obtained from the entropy, CRITIC, standard deviation, mean, and MEREC methods was performed. Three sets of data were generated for the comparative study of the methods, as follows: the mean value for alternatives with weak and strong differences and criteria with linear dependence. Additionally, an actual dataset from mobile phones was also used for the comparison. Full article

Against the backdrop of global warming, intensifying regional conflicts, deglobalization, and the spread of diseases, global food security is facing severe challenges. Studying the food security situation in China and the United States in depth can provide practical experience for formulating food security policies for countries around the world and promoting global food security governance. On the basis of a meticulous review of the evolving connotations of food security, this study adopts six dimensions—quantity security, quality security, circulation security, economic security, ecological resource security, and policy security—as breakthrough points to construct a framework consisting of food security evaluation indicator system comprising 29 specific indicators. The CRITIC–MEREC–MARCOS model is applied to evaluate the status of food security in China and the United States from 2000 to 2022, while the obstacle degree model (ODM) model is utilized to identify factors impeding food security between the two countries. The results indicate that the level of food security in China has shown slight fluctuations initially, followed by a steady upward trend. The gap with the United States is continuously narrowing. However, significant differences between China and the United States still exist in terms of economic security, ecological resource security, and policy security. Furthermore, due to the limited productivity of agricultural labor, scarcity of water and soil resources, and low efficiency in the use of fertilizers and pesticides, China’s food security is subject to economic and environmental constraints. The restrictions imposed by economic security and ecological resource security on China’s food security are showing an increasing trend year by year. For the United States, with the obstruction of grain exports and the increasing frequency of drought disasters, the impact of circulation security and ecological resource security on food security is becoming increasingly prominent. In the future, China and the United States should join hands to address challenges, actively promote international cooperation in food security, and drive sustainable development for humanity. Full article

This paper presents a thorough review of our state-of-the-art technique for enhancing dynamic grid partitioning and scheduling in multi-energy source systems. We use a hybrid approach to T-spherical fuzzy sets, combining the alternative ranking order method accounting for the two-step normalization (AROMAN) method for alternating ranking order to enable two-step normalisation with the method based on removal effects of criteria (MEREC) for eliminating criteria effects. This enables us to obtain the highest level of accuracy from our findings. To ascertain the relative importance of these criteria, we use MEREC to perform a rigorous examination of the influence that each evaluation criterion has on the outcomes of the decision-making process. In addition, we use AROMAN to provide a strong foundation for assessing potential solutions by accounting for spherical fuzzy sets to account for any ambiguity. We illustrate how our approach successfully considers several factors, such as social acceptability, technical feasibility, environmental sustainability, and economic feasibility, through the analysis of an extensive case study. Our approach provides decision-makers (DMs) with a rigorous and rational framework for assessing and choosing the best grid division and scheduling options. This is done in an effort to support the administration and design of resilient and sustainable multi-energy systems. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge in this area by offering insights that help to direct policy, planning, and investment decisions in the shift towards more sustainable energy infrastructures. Moreover, it adds to the growing body of information on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) in energy system optimization. Full article

Fuzzy set theory has extensively employed various divergence measure methods to quantify distinctions between two elements. The primary objective of this study is to introduce a generalized divergence measure integrated into the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach. Given the inherent uncertainty and ambiguity in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) scenarios, the concept of the fuzzy $\alpha$-cut is leveraged. This allows experts to establish a broader spectrum of rankings, accommodating fluctuations in their confidence levels. To produce consistent criteria weights with the existence of outliers, the fuzzy Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) is employed. To showcase the viability and effectiveness of the proposed approach, a quantitative illustration is provided through a staff performance review. In this context, the findings are compared with other MCDM methodologies, considering correlation coefficients and CPU time. The results demonstrate that the proposed technique aligns with current distance measure approaches, with all correlation coefficient values exceeding 0.9. Notably, the proposed method also boasts the shortest CPU time when compared to alternative divergence measure methodologies. As a result, it becomes evident that the proposed technique yields more sensible and practical results compared to its counterparts in this category. Full article

This research addresses the paramount issue of enhancing safety and health conditions in underground mines through the selection of optimal sensor technologies. A novel hybrid MEREC-CoCoSo system is proposed, integrating the strengths of the MEREC (Method for Eliciting Relative Weights) and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) methods. The study involves a three-stage framework: criteria and sensor discernment, criteria weight determination using MEREC, and sensor prioritization through the MEREC-CoCoSo framework. Fifteen criteria and ten sensors were identified, and a comprehensive analysis, including MEREC-based weight determination, led to the prioritization of “Ease of Installation” as the most critical criterion. Proximity sensors were identified as the optimal choice, followed by biometric sensors, gas sensors, and temperature and humidity sensors. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed MEREC-CoCoSo model, a rigorous comparison was conducted with established methods, including VIKOR, TOPSIS, TODIM, ELECTRE, COPRAS, EDAS, and TRUST. The comparison encompassed relevant metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, providing a comprehensive understanding of the proposed model’s performance in relation to other established methodologies. The outcomes of this comparative analysis consistently demonstrated the superiority of the MEREC-CoCoSo model in accurately selecting the best sensor for ensuring safety and health in underground mining. Notably, the proposed model exhibited higher accuracy rates, increased sensitivity, and improved specificity compared to alternative methods. These results affirm the robustness and reliability of the MEREC-CoCoSo model, establishing it as a state-of-the-art decision-making framework for sensor selection in underground mine safety. The inclusion of these actual results enhances the clarity and credibility of our research, providing valuable insights into the superior performance of the proposed model compared to existing methodologies. The main objective of this research is to develop a robust decision-making framework for optimal sensor selection in underground mines, with a focus on enhancing safety and health conditions. The study seeks to identify and prioritize critical criteria for sensor selection in the context of underground mine safety. The research strives to contribute to the mining industry by offering a structured and effective approach to sensor selection, prioritizing safety and health in underground mining operations. Full article

Properly designed and installed interior stairs provide safe and convenient access to all residents of the house, including children and elderly people. While safety considerations are paramount for stair design and placement decisions in a two-storey single-family house, sustainability becomes another important factor in these deliberations. Nevertheless, safety and sustainability of the interior stairs can be seen as conflicting objectives in decision-making processes (i.e., while a larger staircase area positively affect residents’ climbing ability, it also causes higher energy consumption and material usage). Therefore, increased awareness of stair-project selection processes is required when multi-objective tasks are involved. Seven criteria affecting stair safety and sustainability in a single-family house are identified in this paper. The integrated AHP-MEREC criteria-weighting approach is proposed, to determine their weights in decision-making processes. Four different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches, ARAS, SAW, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE, were used to determine alternative evaluations. Since the selection of the most suitable MCDM method is full of uncertainties, the novel combined-decision-making approach formally called CORST (COmbining MCDM appRoaches using method STability coefficient) is proposed in this paper. The new method stability coefficient is used to determine the stability and reliability of the specific MCDM approach. Nine U-shaped inside-staircase projects dedicated to a single-family house were evaluated, to test the effectiveness of the CORST approach. Full article

Decision support systems are being developed as attractive tools to help organizations make better decisions. These systems assist decision-makers in making the best decisions. The widespread application of the internet has transformed the development of decision support systems into a web-based challenge. On the other hand, project selection has always been a significant issue for organizations. The limitation of resources and the existence of different criteria while selecting projects cause organizations to face the challenges of multiple-criteria decision making. In this research, a new approach is introduced for the selection of criteria. It also presents a new web-based decision support system for selecting projects considering uncertainty and various criteria, including organizational strategies, the seventh edition of project management standard, and sustainable development. Therefore, the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development were included as project evaluation indicators. The proposed approach was developed using Pythagorean fuzzy sets, MEREC, and MARCOS methods to examine uncertainty and solution methods. In this approach, a new version of the MARCOS method was developed, with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for rankings. Also, a new development was presented using the Pythagorean fuzzy (PF)-MEREC method, which was used for weighting. The effectiveness of the proposed method is discussed through a real case study conducted on one of the mineral holdings in Iran. Among the mining projects introduced to the company, finally, the second project was selected. In the comparison made using PF-Entropy-TOPSIS and PF-Entropy-VIKOR methods, the superior project provided similar results. By changing the weights of the criteria for four different types of states, sensitivity analysis was used to determine the reliability of the final rankings. In these states, the weights of the criteria were moved together or assigned equal weights, and, in all four states, the ranking results were the same. Full article

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) assists in making judgments on complex problems by evaluating several alternatives based on conflicting criteria. Several MCDM methods have been introduced. However, real-world problems often involve uncertain and ambiguous decision-maker inputs. Therefore, fuzzy MCDM methods have emerged to handle this problem using fuzzy logic. Most recently, the method based on the removal effects of criteria using the geometric mean (MEREC-G) and ranking the alternatives based on the trace to median index (RATMI) were introduced. However, to date, there is no fuzzy extension of the two novel methods. This study introduces a new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach combining fuzzy MEREC-G and fuzzy RATMI. The fuzzy MEREC-G can accept linguistic input terms from multiple decision-makers and generates consistent fuzzy weights. The fuzzy RATMI can rank alternatives according to their fuzzy performance scores on each criterion. The study provides the algorithms of both fuzzy MEREC-G and fuzzy RATMI and demonstrates their application in adopted real-world problems. Correlation and scenario analyses were performed to check the new approach’s validity and sensitivity. The new approach demonstrates high accuracy and consistency and is sufficiently sensitive to changes in the criteria weights, yet not too sensitive to produce inconsistent rankings. Full article

Computer-assisted diagnostic systems have been developed to aid doctors in diagnosing thyroid-related abnormalities. The aim of this research is to improve the diagnosis accuracy of thyroid abnormality detection models that can be utilized to alleviate undue pressure on healthcare professionals. In this research, we proposed deep learning, metaheuristics, and a MCDM algorithms-based framework to detect thyroid-related abnormalities from ultrasound and histopathological images. The proposed method uses three recently developed deep learning techniques (DeiT, Swin Transformer, and Mixer-MLP) to extract features from the thyroid image datasets. The feature extraction techniques are based on the Image Transformer and MLP models. There is a large number of redundant features that can overfit the classifiers and reduce the generalization capabilities of the classifiers. In order to avoid the overfitting problem, six feature transformation techniques (PCA, TSVD, FastICA, ISOMAP, LLE, and UMP) are analyzed to reduce the dimensionality of the data. There are five different classifiers (LR, NB, SVC, KNN, and RF) evaluated using the 5-fold stratified cross-validation technique on the transformed dataset. Both datasets exhibit large class imbalances and hence, the stratified cross-validation technique is used to evaluate the performance. The MEREC-TOPSIS MCDM technique is used for ranking the evaluated models at different analysis stages. In the first stage, the best feature extraction and classification techniques are chosen, whereas, in the second stage, the best dimensionality reduction method is evaluated in wrapper feature selection mode. Two best-ranked models are further selected for the weighted average ensemble learning and features selection using the recently proposed meta-heuristics FOX-optimization algorithm. The PCA+FOX optimization-based feature selection + random forest model achieved the highest TOPSIS score and performed exceptionally well with an accuracy of 99.13%, F2-score of 98.82%, and AUC-ROC score of 99.13% on the ultrasound dataset. Similarly, the model achieved an accuracy score of 90.65%, an F2-score of 92.01%, and an AUC-ROC score of 95.48% on the histopathological dataset. This study exploits the combination novelty of different algorithms in order to improve the thyroid cancer diagnosis capabilities. This proposed framework outperforms the current state-of-the-art diagnostic methods for thyroid-related abnormalities in ultrasound and histopathological datasets and can significantly aid medical professionals by reducing the excessive burden on the medical fraternity. Full article

The autonomous vehicle (AV) is one of the emerging technologies of the new age that has the potential to restructure transportation infrastructure. AVs are able to sense their surroundings and move around with control and self-sufficiency. AVs can contribute towards reducing traffic congestion on the roads, improving the quality of life, and achieving the highest levels of traffic safety. Thus, this type of vehicle can be integrated into the logistics industry. Due to the presence of several AVs, selecting a standard and efficient AV for logistics planning is a great challenge. The selection of an AV depends on many conflicting and essential criteria. Given its efficiency and reliability in dealing with conflicting criteria, a comprehensive multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach was applied to solve the problem of selecting the optimal AV. However, the MCDM selection process is based on human judgment, which can be ambiguous. Accordingly, uncertainty was handled using type-2 neutrosophic numbers (T2NN). Initially, the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) was extended under T2NN and employed to assess and prioritize criteria. Then, the combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method was extended under T2NN and applied to rank the candidate substitutions. To confirm the feasibility of the applied approach, an illustrative case study of four AVs was introduced. A sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the weights of the criteria and some other parameters to confirm the validity and stability of the proposed approach. In addition, a comparison analysis with other MCDM approaches was conducted to show the effectiveness and reliability of the applied approach. This research provides useful information for policymakers in the field of logistics. Finally, the results indicate that the velocity of AVs criterion is the most influential criterion in the selection of an intelligent AV. Full article