[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = OTH radar

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
51 pages, 15859 KiB  
Article
Remote Sensing of the Polar Ice Zones with HF Radar
by Stuart Anderson
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(21), 4398; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214398 - 31 Oct 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3815
Abstract
Radars operating in the HF band are widely used for over-the-horizon remote sensing of ocean surface conditions, ionospheric studies and the monitoring of ship and aircraft traffic. Several hundreds of such radars are in operation, yet only a handful of experiments have been [...] Read more.
Radars operating in the HF band are widely used for over-the-horizon remote sensing of ocean surface conditions, ionospheric studies and the monitoring of ship and aircraft traffic. Several hundreds of such radars are in operation, yet only a handful of experiments have been conducted to assess the prospect of utilizing this technology for the remote sensing of sea ice. Even then, the measurements carried out have addressed only the most basic questions: is there ice present, and can we measure its drift? Recently the theory that describes HF scattering from the dynamic sea surface was extended to handle situations where an ice cover is present. With this new tool, it becomes feasible to interpret the corresponding radar echoes in terms of the structural, mechanical, and electrical properties of the ice field. In this paper we look briefly at ice sensing from space-borne sensors before showing how the persistent and synoptic wide area surveillance capabilities of HF radar offer an alternative. The dispersion relations of different forms of sea ice are examined and used in a modified implementation of the electromagnetic scattering theory employed in HF radar oceanography to compute the corresponding radar signatures. Previous and present-day HF radar deployments at high latitudes are reviewed, noting the physical and technical challenges that confront the implementation of an operational HF radar in its ice monitoring capability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Sea Ice and Icebergs)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Average sea ice extent in (<b>a</b>) September 2020, and (<b>b</b>) February 2021, with the median boundaries over the period 1981–2010 superimposed. The extent here is based on an ice presence threshold of 15% per grid cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic illustrating nominal instantaneous coverage of (hypothetical) monostatic HF radars. For the HFSWR radars, shown with coverage shaded dark green, this generally coincides with total coverage, but skywave radars can relocate their footprint over a vast region, typically several million square kilometers in area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The scattering geometry for bistatic skywave illumination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The Doppler spectrum recorded from a resolution cell at a range of 150 km. The frequency offset due to the radial component V of an ocean current is indicated by the inequality of the displacements <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>R</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mo> </mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>of the Bragg lines from zero Doppler.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Envisat altimeter measurements of ice freeboard along a 2500 km path after correcting for local variations of the geoid [<a href="#B37-remotesensing-13-04398" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) An oblique view of a field of ice floes showing the quasi-polygonal shapes frequently observed during ice breakup; (<b>b</b>) polygons auto-fitted to the floes prior to coordinate transformation and statistical analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The second-generation Cape Race HFSWR transmitting antenna array (Credit DRDC, Ottawa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A section of the original Cape Race HFSWR receiving antenna array of 40 wire ‘kite’ elements (Credit DRDC, Ottawa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The original Cape Bonavista HFSWR transmitting antenna array. (Credit DRDC, Ottawa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The original Cape Bonavista HFSWR receiving antenna array of ‘quadlet’ in-line monopole elements. (Credit DRDC, Ottawa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>CODAR SeaSonde HFSWR near Prudhoe Bay (credit Mr. Hank Statscewicz).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>CODAR SeaSonde radar deployed at Palmer Station, Anvers Island, Antarctica (credit Dr Peter Winsor).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The WERA transmitting array at Pointe-aux-Outardes, on the St Lawrence Seaway, Quebec (photo credit: Prof. Cedric Chavanne).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The WERA receiving array at Pointe-aux-Outardes, on the St Lawrence Seaway, Quebec, installed directly onto the ice (photo credit: Prof. Cedric Chavanne).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Pathways of evolution of sea ice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Conductivity, relative permittivity and skin depth of sea ice and seawater (adapted from ITU Recommendation ITU-R P.527-3, 1992).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Dispersion relation surfaces for free sea surface (top sheet) and progressively greater values of equivalent ice thickness, 0.5 and 1.0 m. A horizontal plane is drawn at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> to help visualize the increments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(<b>a</b>) Real part of the wavenumber as a function of wave period for different values of viscosity. (<b>b</b>) Imaginary part of the wavenumber as a function of wave period for different values of viscosity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Integration contours in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>κ</mi> <mo>→</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>-space, shown in black, for the second-order scattering contributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Integration contours in the first quadrant of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>κ</mi> <mo>→</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>-space, for four values of the ice thickness parameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Doppler spectra computed for a free surface (blue) and a surface loaded with small floes (red), presented to illustrate the displacement of the strong, sharp peaks that result from first-order scatter, making discrimination straightforward.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Modelled Doppler spectra for a free surface (upper panel) and a mass-loaded surface (bottom panel), computed in each case for three radar frequencies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Ocean wave transmission and reflection by viscoelastic ice covers ([<a href="#B77-remotesensing-13-04398" class="html-bibr">77</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Computed Doppler spectra in the open sea just in front of the ice field, for two cases: (<b>a</b>) no ice, i.e., no reflection, and (<b>b</b>) ice sheet present. Both sets of spectra are computed for six wind speeds parametrizing directional wave spectra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>The differential Doppler frequency shifts between the free surface and two models (mass loading and viscoelastic), showing the kinds of variations with wavelength that can occur, possibly resulting in ambiguity if other signatures are not taken into account.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>The variation of the electric field strength at the surface, plotted as a function of range, for a free surface and two values of ice thickness. The amplification of the field at short ranges is evident.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>A schematic illustration of multiple scattering, with a path experiencing an extra scattering event between transmitter and receiver.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Wave period (seconds) for first-order resonant scatter as a function of radar frequency and bistatic angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Waves retrievable from HF radar echoes for different radar configurations. (<b>a</b>) Single monostatic radar, single frequency, first-order information; (<b>b</b>) Single monostatic radar, multi-frequency, first-order information; (<b>c</b>) Two radars in stereoscopic mode, multi-frequency, first-order information; (<b>d</b>) Two radars in bistatic mode, multi-frequency, first-order information; (<b>e</b>) Single monostatic radar, single frequency, second-order information; (<b>f</b>) Two radars, stereoscopic or bistatic mode, single frequency, second-order information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Polar region coverage of the SuperDARN radar networks (courtesy of Prof. Stephen Shepherd).</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>The Dome-C radar of the Southern SuperDARN network, located in Antarctica and supported by the Italian National Program for Antarctic Research (PNRA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>The two-dimensional array of the Canadian experimental radar (photo courtesy of Dr Ryan Riddolls).</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>One arm of the receiving array of the Konteyner receiving antenna array.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7567 KiB  
Article
IoT OTH Maritime Surveillance Service over Satellite Network in Equatorial Environment: Analysis, Design and Deployment
by Ranko Petrovic, Dejan Simic, Zoran Cica, Dejan Drajic, Marko Nerandzic and Dejan Nikolic
Electronics 2021, 10(17), 2070; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10172070 - 27 Aug 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2676
Abstract
This paper explores the challenges and constraints when over the horizon (OTH) maritime surveillance service utilizes an Internet of Things (IoT) as its backbone. The service is based on High Frequency Surface Wave Radars (HFSWRs) and relies on a satellite communication network as [...] Read more.
This paper explores the challenges and constraints when over the horizon (OTH) maritime surveillance service utilizes an Internet of Things (IoT) as its backbone. The service is based on High Frequency Surface Wave Radars (HFSWRs) and relies on a satellite communication network as its communication infrastructure in harsh environments. The complete IoT OTH maritime surveillance network is currently deployed in the Gulf of Guinea, which due to its tropical climate represents an unfavorable environment for sensors and communications. In this paper, we have examined the service performance under various meteorological conditions specific to the Gulf of Guinea. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of IoT OTH maritime surveillance service in equatorial environment. Our analysis aims to mathematically describe the impact of harsh weather conditions on the performance of the service in order to mitigate it with careful overall system design and provide constant quality of the service. Analyses presented in the paper show that average service latency is about 90 s, but it can rise to about 120 s, which is used as a key information during the sensor data fusion algorithm design. Validity of the analyses is demonstrated through high quality of service with an outage probability of just 0.1% in the driest months up to the 0.7% in the rainiest months. The work presented here can be used as a guideline for deployment of maritime surveillance service solutions in other equatorial regions. Moreover, the gained experience presented in this paper will significantly facilitate future expansions of the existing maritime surveillance network with more HFSWRs. This will be done in such a way that it will not affect the quality of service of the entire system on a large scale. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art in Satellite Communication Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fixed telephony penetration in the Gulf of Guinea (based on data available from [<a href="#B25-electronics-10-02070" class="html-bibr">25</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fixed Broadband penetration in the Gulf of Guinea (based on data available from [<a href="#B26-electronics-10-02070" class="html-bibr">26</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mobile telephony penetration in the Gulf of Guinea (based on data available from [<a href="#B27-electronics-10-02070" class="html-bibr">27</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Complete maritime surveillance solution architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Log file showing the times relevant for cfar_reg files.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of detection (cfar_reg) file sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Average precipitation per months.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Surveillance during favorable weather conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Transfer rate during favorable weather conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Bad weather conditions over part of the HFSWR surveillance area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>HFSWR detection capabilities during bad weather conditions over part of the HFSWR surveillance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Bad weather conditions over the HFSWR sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>HFSWR detection capabilities during bad weather conditions over part of the HFSWR surveillance area and HFSWR sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Transfer rate during bad weather conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>CDF for detection file size range 15–25 kB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>CDF for detection file size range 25–35 kB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>CDF of 15–25 kB and 25–35 kB for Dec–Feb.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>CDF of 15–25 kB and 25–35 kB for May–July.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Statistical modeling for June 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Statistical modeling for July 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Outage probability comparison between rainiest and driest months.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 6027 KiB  
Article
Applying an Adaptive Signal Identification Method to Improve Vessel Echo Detection and Tracking for SeaSonde HF Radar
by Laurence Zsu-Hsin Chuang, Yu-Ru Chen and Yu-Jen Chung
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(13), 2453; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132453 - 23 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2769
Abstract
To enhance remote sensing for maritime safety and security, various sensors need to be integrated into a centralized maritime surveillance system (MSS). High-frequency (HF) radar systems are a type of mainstream technology widely used in international marine remote sensing and have great potential [...] Read more.
To enhance remote sensing for maritime safety and security, various sensors need to be integrated into a centralized maritime surveillance system (MSS). High-frequency (HF) radar systems are a type of mainstream technology widely used in international marine remote sensing and have great potential to detect distant sea surface targets due to their over-the-horizon (OTH) capability. However, effectively recognizing targets in spectra with intrinsic strong disturbance echoes and random environmental noise is still challenging. To avoid the above problem, this paper proposes an adaptive signal identification method to detect target signals based on a rapid and flexible threshold. By integrating a watershed segmentation algorithm, the subsequent direction result can be used to automatically compute the direction of arrival (DOA) of the targets. To assist in the orientation of the object, forward intersections are integrated with the technique. Hence, the proposed technique can effectively recognize vessel echoes with automatic identification system (AIS) verification. Experiments have demonstrated the promising feasibility of the proposed method’s performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Maritime Safety and Security)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>SeaSonde hardware equipment: (<b>a</b>) the transmitting antenna (Tx); (<b>b</b>) the receiving antenna (Rx), including a monopole and two cross-loop antennas; and (<b>c</b>) the central control system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Data processing for ocean surface current measurement by the SeaSonde HF radar system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter diagram of moving windows and noise.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The proposed data processing procedure for SeaSonde HF radar to detect the geographic coordinates of vessels includes echo identification, locating the peaks of echo signals, and ship direction detection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Preprocessing for ROI selection: (<b>a</b>) Raw self-spectrum of the monopole of Habn at 07:59:48 on 29 October 2013; (<b>b</b>) Result of closing operation on <a href="#remotesensing-13-02453-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>a; (<b>c</b>) ROI selection from the recognition result of Canny edge detection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic results of each step in the ASI algorithm: (<b>a</b>) An ROI of CSS has a strong echo at zero velocity; (<b>b</b>) DC removal of <a href="#remotesensing-13-02453-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>a; (<b>c</b>) Moving average surface of <a href="#remotesensing-13-02453-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>b; (<b>d</b>) Residual series; (<b>e</b>) The watershed algorithm divides a suspected ship echo into separate regions; (<b>f</b>) Location of the local peak of each suspected vessel (red circle).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Test of selecting the best 2D MA filter: (<b>a</b>) Skewness and kurtosis of the histogram of the residual series for various moving window sizes; (<b>b</b>) Slope changes in the skewness curve and the convergence condition setting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematics of the measured antenna pattern and DOA function: (<b>a</b>) The red and blue lines are two cross-loop antenna patterns; the orange line is the loop 1 pointing angle; (<b>b</b>) DOA function; the green peak point represents the signal source.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Two consecutive detection results using the ASI algorithm; the green arrows are radar signals of ship 1: (<b>a</b>) At 7:59 on 29 October 2013 (UTC); (<b>b</b>) At 8:16 on 29 October 2013 (UTC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Two consecutive direction-finding results using the MUSIC algorithm; the green dots are the DOAs of ship 1: (<b>a</b>) At 7:59 on 29 October 2013 (UTC); (<b>b</b>) At 8:16 on 29 October 2013 (UTC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Trajectories of vessels from 29 October 2013 to 31 October 2013; the blue dots are the trajectory predictions of ship 1 at 04:34–09:08 on 29 October 2013; the red dots are those of ship 2 at 00:53–05:43 on 29 October 2013; the purple dots are those of ship 3 at 20:30 on 30 October 2013 to 02:52 on 31 October 2013. The three green lines are the actual tracks from the AIS database.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Scatter plot of the SNR and bearing error statistics of the sample vessels.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 9474 KiB  
Article
Bistatic and Stereoscopic Configurations for HF Radar
by Stuart Anderson
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(4), 689; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040689 - 20 Feb 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4274
Abstract
Most HF radars operate in a monostatic or quasi-monostatic configuration. The collocation of transmit and receive facilities simplifies testing and maintenance, reduces demands on communications networks, and enables the use of established and relatively straightforward signal processing and data interpretation techniques. Radars of [...] Read more.
Most HF radars operate in a monostatic or quasi-monostatic configuration. The collocation of transmit and receive facilities simplifies testing and maintenance, reduces demands on communications networks, and enables the use of established and relatively straightforward signal processing and data interpretation techniques. Radars of this type are well-suited to missions such as current mapping, waveheight measurement, and the detection of ships and aircraft. The high scientific, defense, and economic value of the radar products is evident from the fact that hundreds of HF radars are presently in operation, the great majority of them relying on the surface wave mode of propagation, though some systems employ line-of-sight or skywave modalities. Yet, notwithstanding the versatility and proven capabilities of monostatic HF radars, there are some types of observations for which the monostatic geometry renders them less effective. In these cases, one must turn to more general radar configurations, including those that employ a multiplicity of propagation modalities to achieve the desired illumination, scattering selectivity, and echo reception. In this paper, we survey some of the considerations that arise with bistatic HF radar configurations, explore some of the missions for which they are optimal, and describe some practical techniques that can guide their design and deployment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bistatic HF Radar)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A taxonomy of HF radar configurations. The conventional monostatic surface wave and skywave radars are indicated with blue and green markers, respectively; the topical hybrid sky–surface wave configuration is shown by the magenta marker.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The problem of range-ambiguous echoes associated with periodic waveforms is greatly reduced with bistatic configurations. These enable one to steer the receiver beams over the desired ambiguity zone whilst rejecting unwanted returns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The geometrical congruence of (<b>a</b>) a pair of monostatic radar observations, and (<b>b</b>) a single bistatic radar observation. To see the equivalence, simply imagine that the area shown as land is actually sea and the area shown as sea is actually land, whereby <a href="#remotesensing-12-00689-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b appears as a land-based bistatic radar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A backscatter ionogram—a map of echo strength as a function of (group) range and radar frequency. The dashed lines show, for a representative frequency, how the outbound and inbound group ranges must both lie in the band indicated for the system to operate successfully.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A map showing a single instance of the predicted bistatic sub-clutter visibility (clutter-to-noise ratio) in the overlap region of two skywave radars, as inferred using the geometrical congruence technique from a single azimuthal scan recorded with a separate monostatic radar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Phase modulation sequences measured over skywave propagation paths; (<b>a</b>) an example of a field line resonance modulation, with slow spatial variation over a distance of 150 km, and (<b>b</b>) an example where the modulation arises from other geophysical mechanisms, with spatial decorrelation occurring within 20 km.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Double Bragg scattering processes in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>κ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>-space. The red vector represents the incident radiowave, the blue vector the scattered radiowave, and the black vector, the required change in wave vector to be delivered by pairs of ocean waves whose <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>κ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> -vectors meet at the intersection of the circles of given wavenumbers. Here they are drawn for the case of equal wavenumbers. Tx and Rx indicate the directions of the transmitter and receiver.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>An example of the variation of the Doppler spectrum for representative bistatic scattering geometries incident on the same sea state: Backscatter, forward scatter, side scatter, and up scatter, as applicable to different HF radar configurations (reproduced from [<a href="#B18-remotesensing-12-00689" class="html-bibr">18</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sea clutter Doppler spectrum: φ = 45°(red), 90°(green), 135°(blue), 180°(black); F = 25 MHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Sea clutter Doppler spectrum: φ = 45°(red), 90°(green), 135°(blue), 180°(black); F = 15 MHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Sea clutter Doppler spectrum: φ = 45°(red), 90°(green), 135°(blue), 180°(black); F = 5 MHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Modelled and measured Doppler spectra presented as range-Doppler maps. The variation of Bragg frequency with bistatic angle is clearly seen, especially at low ranges as the bistatic angle approaches its maximum. At near ranges, a decrease in signal power is evident in the measurement—this is due to the transmit antenna gain pattern falling off at angles close to the bearing to the receiver.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The Fremantle Class patrol boat and the Aermacchi MB 326H trainer aircraft.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The bistatic RCS of the Fremantle Class patrol boat, evaluated at HF radar frequencies 5, 10, 15, and 20 MHz for HFSWR configurations. The lower panel in each case shows the monostatic RCS which is just the cut along the trailing diagonal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Ship detection in clutter and noise, showing the importance of thresholding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The HFSWR RCS of the Aermacchi MB 326H aircraft as a function of aspect and radar frequency. The five panels correspond to different bistatic angles as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Power spectra of terrain elevation for (<b>a</b>) a hilly region, and (<b>b</b>) a relatively flat region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The variation of the VV scattering coefficient as a function of bistatic angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The omnidirectional spectrum of an ambient sea, and, superimposed (in red), the wake of a merchant ship at normal sailing speed; note that the abscissa is frequency, not wavenumber, connected here by the familiar deep-water dispersion relation. The radar frequencies corresponding to monostatic Bragg scatter are marked by the dashed lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Doppler spectra computed for two situations: (<b>a</b>) A free ocean surface, and (<b>b</b>) a sea covered with small ice floes (‘pancake’ ice). Results for three radar frequencies are superimposed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>(<b>a</b>) The bistatic configuration of the satellite-borne receiver acquiring sea clutter echoes produced by a shore-based HFSWR, and (<b>b</b>) the computed Doppler spectrum of the signal arriving at points along the satellite orbital path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Experimental data from a nominal HF surface wave radar, which by happenstance recorded signals on Tx -&gt; skywave -&gt; sea scatter -&gt; surface wave -&gt; receiver. The magenta traces indicate the direct overhead reflection, the orange traces show the path of interest. Note that dual reflection points in the corrugated ionosphere provided a pair of echo traces in each case, slightly displaced in Doppler.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Blind speed diagrams for a bistatic radar system: (<b>a</b>) Aircraft detection, (<b>b</b>) ship detection. The blue arrows show the projection of the target velocity vector (black) onto the axis of Radar 1; the red arrows show the projection onto the axis of Radar 2. The blind speeds are shaded in the velocity annulus: Blue for Radar 1, red for Radar 2, yellow for doubly blind azimuths that can arise in the case of sea clutter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Trigonometric properties of overlapped radar coverage from the viewpoint of stereoscopic modes of operation. <a href="#remotesensing-12-00689-f024" class="html-fig">Figure 24</a>a shows the degree of orthogonality as measured by the sine of the bistatic angle, while <a href="#remotesensing-12-00689-f024" class="html-fig">Figure 24</a>b expresses it in terms of the minimum component of radial velocity that a target can present. The figure is for illustrative purposes only: The radar sites shown do not correspond to existing radars.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2638 KiB  
Article
Fuzzy Functional Dependencies as a Method of Choice for Fusion of AIS and OTHR Data
by Medhat Abdel Rahman Mohamed Mostafa, Miljan Vucetic, Nikola Stojkovic, Nikola Lekić and Aleksej Makarov
Sensors 2019, 19(23), 5166; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235166 - 26 Nov 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3189
Abstract
Maritime situational awareness at over-the-horizon (OTH) distances in exclusive economic zones can be achieved by deploying networks of high-frequency OTH radars (HF-OTHR) in coastal countries along with exploiting automatic identification system (AIS) data. In some regions the reception of AIS messages can be [...] Read more.
Maritime situational awareness at over-the-horizon (OTH) distances in exclusive economic zones can be achieved by deploying networks of high-frequency OTH radars (HF-OTHR) in coastal countries along with exploiting automatic identification system (AIS) data. In some regions the reception of AIS messages can be unreliable and with high latency. This leads to difficulties in properly associating AIS data to OTHR tracks. Long history records about the previous whereabouts of vessels based on both OTHR tracks and AIS data can be maintained in order to increase the chances of fusion. If the quantity of data increases significantly, data cleaning can be done in order to minimize system requirements. This process is performed prior to fusing AIS data and observed OTHR tracks. In this paper, we use fuzzy functional dependencies (FFDs) in the context of data fusion from AIS and OTHR sources. The fuzzy logic approach has been shown to be a promising tool for handling data uncertainty from different sensors. The proposed method is experimentally evaluated for fusing AIS data and the target tracks provided by the OTHR installed in the Gulf of Guinea. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Sensors and Devices in Artificial Intelligence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Algorithm for the fusion of automatic identification system (AIS) data and over-the-horizon radar (OTHR) tracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Maritime situation of the OTHR coverage area with reported AIS data in the Gulf of Guinea site (yellow—OTHR targets, red—AIS points, white—radar clutter).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results obtained for targets association over repeated iterations. Time interval from 16:33 h to 17:33 (3600 s).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fused AIS point with OTHR track—Dafne ex Emirates Asante [<a href="#B27-sensors-19-05166" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The results of experiment—complete operational picture for maritime surveillance (yellow—OTHR targets, red—AIS points, blue—fused data).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3003 KiB  
Article
Maritime Over the Horizon Sensor Integration: HFSWR Data Fusion Algorithm
by Dejan Nikolic, Nikola Stojkovic, Zdravko Popovic, Nikola Tosic, Nikola Lekic, Zoran Stankovic and Nebojsa Doncov
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(7), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070852 - 9 Apr 2019
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 5728
Abstract
In order to provide a constant and complete operational picture of the maritime situation in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) at over the horizon (OTH) distances, a network of high frequency surface-wave-radars (HFSWR) slowly becomes a necessity. Since each HFSWR in the network [...] Read more.
In order to provide a constant and complete operational picture of the maritime situation in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) at over the horizon (OTH) distances, a network of high frequency surface-wave-radars (HFSWR) slowly becomes a necessity. Since each HFSWR in the network tracks all the targets it detects independently of other radars in the network, there will be situations where multiple tracks are formed for a single vessel. The algorithm proposed in this paper utilizes radar tracks obtained from individual HFSWRs which are already processed by the multi-target tracking algorithm at the single radar level, and fuses them into a unique data stream. In this way, the data obtained from multiple HFSWRs originating from the very same target are weighted and combined into a single track. Moreover, the weighting approach significantly reduces inaccuracy. The algorithm is designed, implemented, and tested in a real working environment. The testing environment is located in the Gulf of Guinea and includes a network of two HFSWRs. In order to validate the algorithm outputs, the position of the vessels was calculated by the algorithm and compared with the positions obtained from several coastal sites, with LAIS receivers and SAIS data provided by a SAIS provider. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Target Detection in Marine Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>HFSWR network coverage area (taken from [<a href="#B21-remotesensing-11-00852" class="html-bibr">21</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Main steps of the data fusion algorithm (taken from [<a href="#B18-remotesensing-11-00852" class="html-bibr">18</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>2 of the data fusion algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Case” (dark blue trace: radar 0 data, green trace: radar 1 data, purple trace: fused track, red trace: AIS data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Update” (red trace: long radar track provided by radar 1, orange trace: fused track, yellow trace: new radar track provided by radar 0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>“Tracks” and “Unstable target” (red trace: radar 0 data, green trace: radar 1 data, brown trace: fused track, white trace: AIS data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>One iteration log file.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Daily log file.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Yearly statistics.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 30980 KiB  
Article
Maritime over the Horizon Sensor Integration: High Frequency Surface-Wave-Radar and Automatic Identification System Data Integration Algorithm
by Dejan Nikolic, Nikola Stojkovic and Nikola Lekic
Sensors 2018, 18(4), 1147; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041147 - 9 Apr 2018
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 5484
Abstract
To obtain the complete operational picture of the maritime situation in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) which lies over the horizon (OTH) requires the integration of data obtained from various sensors. These sensors include: high frequency surface-wave-radar (HFSWR), satellite automatic identification system (SAIS) [...] Read more.
To obtain the complete operational picture of the maritime situation in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) which lies over the horizon (OTH) requires the integration of data obtained from various sensors. These sensors include: high frequency surface-wave-radar (HFSWR), satellite automatic identification system (SAIS) and land automatic identification system (LAIS). The algorithm proposed in this paper utilizes radar tracks obtained from the network of HFSWRs, which are already processed by a multi-target tracking algorithm and associates SAIS and LAIS data to the corresponding radar tracks, thus forming an integrated data pair. During the integration process, all HFSWR targets in the vicinity of AIS data are evaluated and the one which has the highest matching factor is used for data association. On the other hand, if there is multiple AIS data in the vicinity of a single HFSWR track, the algorithm still makes only one data pair which consists of AIS and HFSWR data with the highest mutual matching factor. During the design and testing, special attention is given to the latency of AIS data, which could be very high in the EEZs of developing countries. The algorithm is designed, implemented and tested in a real working environment. The testing environment is located in the Gulf of Guinea and includes a network of HFSWRs consisting of two HFSWRs, several coastal sites with LAIS receivers and SAIS data provided by provider of SAIS data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>High frequency surface-wave-radar (HFSWR) network coverage area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Steps of automatic identification system-multi-radar fusion track (AIS-MRFT) integration algorithm (taken from [<a href="#B14-sensors-18-01147" class="html-bibr">14</a>]). In the first step, the algorithm is conducting the following operations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Step 2 of AIS-MRFT integration algorithm—Search for Candidates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Resolving a “clear situation”—vessel is sailing in a straight line (light purple trace MRTF, light blue trace AIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Resolving a “clear situation”—maneuvering target (yellow trace: MRFT data, dark red trace: AIS data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Resolving a complex situation—only MRFT data presented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Resolving a complex situation—MRFT F_41274 (dark red trace: MRFT data, green trace: AIS data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Land automatic identification system (LAIS) and satellite automatic identification system (SAIS) data latency (red trace: MRFT data, yellow trace: AIS data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>One MRFT and multiple AIS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>One iteration log file.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Day log file.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Yearly statistics.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>HF noise level in Gulf of Guinea.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Measured noise level—Gulf of Guinea, 24 November 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>SNR after signal processing (blue trace laboratory test, red trace field test).</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Range accuracy.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Angular accuracy.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Speed accuracy.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop