[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Golden Gate Highlands National Park

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 1781 KiB  
Article
Firebreaks and Their Effect on Vegetation Composition and Diversity in Grasslands of Golden Gate Highlands National Park, South Africa
by Andri C. van Aardt, J. C. Linde de Jager and Johan J. van Tol
Diversity 2024, 16(7), 373; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070373 - 27 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1356
Abstract
Southern African grasslands with a rich flora, shaped by fire, grazing, climate and geology, as well as playing a role in carbon sequestration, are becoming more important in conservation. Fire is often used as a management tool to improve vegetation and to protect [...] Read more.
Southern African grasslands with a rich flora, shaped by fire, grazing, climate and geology, as well as playing a role in carbon sequestration, are becoming more important in conservation. Fire is often used as a management tool to improve vegetation and to protect property against uncontrolled fire. We therefore attempt to determine the effect consecutive burning has on vegetation. Paired plots along firebreaks were used to collect vegetation data using the Braun-Blanquet cover abundance scale. Soil samples were also collected to determine the impact of fire on below-ground nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) stocks and ratios. The results indicate that there is no difference between the plant communities of the firebreaks and the adjacent grassland; however, there are certain species that are favoured by firebreaks and others by the adjacent grassland. There is also no difference in diversity between the firebreaks and adjacent grassland areas. Carbon and nitrogen stocks as well as C:N ratios did not differ significantly between the firebreaks and the adjacent grassland plots although trends indicate a decline in both C and N with repeated burning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity and Ecology of African Vegetation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the Golden Gate Highlands National Park with the different vegetation types [<a href="#B6-diversity-16-00373" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of some paired data plots along the firebreaks and the adjacent grassland in Golden Gate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graph of the (<b>a</b>) species richness (S), (<b>b</b>) Shannon diversity (H’) and (<b>c</b>) Simpson diversity (D) for the firebreaks and adjacent grassland (grassland) in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nitrogen and carbon stocks as well as C:N ratio of the firebreaks (burn) and adjacent grassland (no-burn) in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park. Means reported as red dots.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 4651 KiB  
Article
An Integrated Grassland Fire-Danger-Assessment System for a Mountainous National Park Using Geospatial Modelling Techniques
by Olga D. Mofokeng, Samuel A. Adelabu and Colbert M. Jackson
Fire 2024, 7(2), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7020061 - 19 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1976
Abstract
Grasslands are key to the Earth’s system and provide crucial ecosystem services. The degradation of the grassland ecosystem in South Africa is increasing alarmingly, and fire is regarded as one of the major culprits. Globally, anthropogenic climate changes have altered fire regimes in [...] Read more.
Grasslands are key to the Earth’s system and provide crucial ecosystem services. The degradation of the grassland ecosystem in South Africa is increasing alarmingly, and fire is regarded as one of the major culprits. Globally, anthropogenic climate changes have altered fire regimes in the grassland biome. Integrated fire-risk assessment systems provide an integral approach to fire prevention and mitigate the negative impacts of fire. However, fire risk-assessment is extremely challenging, owing to the myriad of factors that influence fire ignition and behaviour. Most fire danger systems do not consider fire causes; therefore, they are inadequate in validating the estimation of fire danger. Thus, fire danger assessment models should comprise the potential causes of fire. Understanding the key drivers of fire occurrence is key to the sustainable management of South Africa’s grassland ecosystems. Therefore, this study explored six statistical and machine learning models—the frequency ratio (FR), weight of evidence (WoE), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) in Google Earth Engine (GEE) to assess fire danger in an Afromontane grassland protected area (PA). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve results (ROC/AUC) revealed that DT showed the highest precision on model fit and success rate, while the WoE was used to record the highest prediction rate (AUC = 0.74). The WoE model showed that 53% of the study area is susceptible to fire. The land surface temperature (LST) and vegetation condition index (VCI) were the most influential factors. Corresponding analysis suggested that the fire regime of the study area is fuel-dominated. Thus, fire danger management strategies within the Golden Gate Highlands National Park (GGHNP) should include fuel management aiming at correctly weighing the effects of fuel in fire ignition and spread. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Wildfire: Regime Change and Disaster Response)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the Golden Gate Highlands National Park (GGHNP) in Free State Province, South Africa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Climate of the study area (<b>a</b>) mean monthly precipitation and actual evapotranspiration rate (<b>b</b>); mean monthly minimum and maximum temperature adapted from [<a href="#B84-fire-07-00061" class="html-bibr">84</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Percentage of area of fire-danger classes in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park (GGHNP) generated using decision tree (DT), frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and weight of evidence (WoE) models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fire-danger mapping in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park (GGHNP) using (<b>a</b>) decision tree (DT); (<b>b</b>) frequency ratio (FR); (<b>c</b>) logistic regression (LR); (<b>d</b>) random forest (RF); (<b>e</b>) support vector machines (SVM); and (<b>f</b>) weight of evidence (WoE) models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ROC/AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) results of the (<b>a</b>) decision tree (DT), (<b>b</b>) frequency ratio (FR), (<b>c</b>) logistic regression (LR), (<b>d</b>) random forest (RF), (<b>e</b>) support vector machines (SVM), and (<b>f</b>) weight of evidence (WoE) models used in the wildfire-danger assessment in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park (GGHNP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Jack-knife of regularized training gains for modelling wildfire danger in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park (GGHNP); BSI (bare soil index), coarse (coarse fragments), GCI (grass curing index), GVMI (global vegetation moisture index), LST (land surface temperature), prox_structures (proximity from other infrastructure, e.g., built environment and tourist facilities), SMC (soil moisture content), TAWCP (total plant available water-holding capacity), TPI (topographic position index), TRI (topographic ruggedness index), TWI (topographic water index), VCI (vegetation condition index), prox_river (proximity from river), and prox_road (proximity from road).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pearson correlation graph between wildfire-driving factors and fire danger index (SI).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop