[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (87)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GIMMS3g

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 10088 KiB  
Article
Increased Sensitivity and Accelerated Response of Vegetation to Water Variability in China from 1982 to 2022
by Huan Tang, Jiawei Fang, Yang Li and Jing Yuan
Water 2024, 16(18), 2677; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182677 - 20 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1307
Abstract
Understanding how plants adapt to shifting water availability is imperative for predicting ecosystem vulnerability to drought. However, the spatial–temporal dynamics of the plant–water relationship remain uncertain. In this study, we employed the latest Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) Normalized Difference Vegetation [...] Read more.
Understanding how plants adapt to shifting water availability is imperative for predicting ecosystem vulnerability to drought. However, the spatial–temporal dynamics of the plant–water relationship remain uncertain. In this study, we employed the latest Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI4g), an updated version succeeding GIMMS NDVI3g spanning from 1982 to 2022. We integrated this dataset with the multiple scale Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI 1 to 24) to investigate the spatial–temporal variability of sensitivity and lag in vegetation growth in response to water variability across China. Our findings indicate that over 83% of China’s vegetation demonstrates positive sensitivity to water availability, with approximately 66% exhibiting a shorter response lag (lag < 1 month). This relationship varies across aridity gradients and diverges among plant functional types. Over 66% of China’s vegetation displays increased sensitivity to water variability and 63% manifests a short response lag to water changes over the past 41 years. These outcomes significantly contribute to understanding vegetation dynamics in response to changing water conditions, implying a heightened susceptibility of vegetation to drought in a future warming world. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Plant functional types derived from Global Land Cover 2000 (GLC2000).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial Patterns and Average Values of Sensitivity, Response Lag, and Optimal SPEI Scale Across China. Spatial distribution of (<b>a</b>) sensitivity, (<b>b</b>) response lag (in months), and (<b>c</b>) cumulative time scale across China. The histogram of each spatial distribution is embedded in the lower left corner. (<b>e</b>) Shows the average sensitivity for all pixels across different lags (0 to 5 months) based on SPEI 1 to 24, while (<b>g</b>) highlights the percentage with statistically significant sensitivity (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). (<b>d</b>) Shows average sensitivity across different SPEI scales. (<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>) Depict the average sensitivity and percentage of statistically significant values for each lag.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sensitivity and Response Lags Across Aridity Gradient and Plant Functional Types. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Show sensitivity and lags along the aridity index gradient based on SPEI 1 to 24; the top of each panel shows the average sensitivity and response lag within each aridity index bin. The shaded area represents the probability distribution of the aridity index. (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) Show sensitivity and response lags for different plant functional types; error bars indicate standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temporal Trends in Sensitivity and Response Lag (1982–2022). Trends in (<b>a</b>) sensitivity (<b>b</b>) response lag (in months) and (<b>c</b>) cumulative time scale across China from 1982 to 2022, based on a 10-year moving window analysis. Gray lines represent individual SPEI timescales (1 to 24 months). Colored dashed lines represent the average values for different plant functional types. The thick red line shows the overall average sensitivity or response lag for all SPEI scales and plant functional types. The black dashed line represents the linear fit line for the overall average values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sensitivity Trends Across Different Response Lags (1982–2022). (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Show trends in sensitivity across China from 1982 to 2022, based on a 10-year moving window analysis, for different response lags (1 to 5 months); each panel shows the sensitivity for a specific lag. (<b>f</b>) Shows trends in sensitivity based on the optimal lag (the lag with the maximum average sensitivity). Gray lines represent individual SPEI timescales (1 to 24 months). The thick red line shows the overall average sensitivity or response lag for all SPEI scales and plant functional types. The black dashed line represents the linear fit line for the overall average values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial and Temporal Trends in Sensitivity and Response Lag (1982–2022). Spatial distribution of trends in (<b>a</b>) sensitivity, (<b>c</b>) response lag (in months), and (<b>e</b>) cumulative time scale across China from 1982 to 2022. (Sensitivity and lag are the average of SPEI 1 to 24 months.) Bivariate color maps display the relationship between long-term average values (1982–2022) and temporal trends for (<b>b</b>) sensitivity, (<b>d</b>) response lag, and (<b>f</b>) cumulative time scale. The color legend’s horizontal axis represents the long-term average sensitivity, lag, or cumulative time scale. The vertical axis reflects the trends in sensitivity, lag, or cumulative time scale over time.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 11204 KiB  
Article
Evolution of Vegetation Growth Season on the Loess Plateau under Future Climate Scenarios
by Hongzhu Han, Gao Ma, Zhijie Ta, Ting Zhao, Peilin Li and Xiaofeng Li
Forests 2024, 15(9), 1526; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091526 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 910
Abstract
In recent decades, vegetation phenology, as one of the most sensitive and easily observed features under climate change, has changed significantly under the influence of the global warming as a result of the green house effect. Vegetation phenological change is not only highly [...] Read more.
In recent decades, vegetation phenology, as one of the most sensitive and easily observed features under climate change, has changed significantly under the influence of the global warming as a result of the green house effect. Vegetation phenological change is not only highly related to temperature change, but also to precipitation, a key factor affecting vegetation phenological change. However, the response of vegetation phenology to climate change is different in different regions, and the current research still does not fully understand the climate drivers that control phenological change. The study focuses on the Loess Plateau, utilizing the GIMMS NDVI3g dataset to extract vegetation phenology parameters from 1982 to 2015 and analyzing their spatial–temporal variations and responses to climate change. Furthermore, by incorporating emission scenarios of RCP4.5 (medium and low emission) and RCP8.5 (high emission), the study predicts and analyzes the changes in vegetation phenology on the Loess Plateau from 2030 to 2100. The long-term dynamic response of vegetation phenology to climate change and extreme climate is explored, so as to provide a scientific basis for the sustainable development of the fragile Loess Plateau. The key findings are as follows: (1) From 1982 to 2015, the start of the growing season (SOS) on the Loess Plateau shows a non-significant delay (0.06 d/year, p > 0.05), while the end of the growing season (EOS) is significantly delayed at a rate of 0.1 d/year (p < 0.05). (2) In the southeastern part of the Loess Plateau, temperature increases led to a significant advancement of SOS. Conversely, in the Maowusu Desert in the northwest, increased autumn precipitation caused a significant delay in EOS. (3) From 2030 to 2100, under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, temperatures are projected to rise significantly at rates of 0.018 °C/year and 0.06 °C/year, respectively. Meanwhile, precipitation will either decrease insignificantly at −0.009 mm/year under RCP4.5 or increase significantly at 0.799 mm/year under RCP8.5. In this context, SOS is projected to advance by 19 days and 28 days, respectively, under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, with advancement rates of 0.049 days/year and 0.228 days/year. EOS is projected to be delayed by 14 days and 27 days (p < 0.05), respectively, with delay rates of 0.084 d/year and 0.2 d/year. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Meteorology and Climate Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The geographical location of the Loess Plateau and its vegetation distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The trend in SOS in the Loess Plateau from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The trend in EOS in the Loess Plateau from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The trend in LOS in the Loess Plateau from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of temperature and precipitation trends in the Loess Plateau from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation between SOS and spring temperature and precipitation in the Loess Plateau.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Correlation between EOS and summer and autumn temperature and precipitation in the Loess Plateau.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Trends in temperature and precipitation changes in the Loess Plateau from 2030 to 2100, the blue line represent the RCP4.5 and the red linerepresentRCP8.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The trend in SOS, EOS and LOS in the Loess Plateau from 2030 to 2100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of phenological changes in the Loess Plateau from 2030 to 2100.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4232 KiB  
Article
Recent Cereal Phenological Variations under Mediterranean Conditions
by Pilar Benito-Verdugo, Ángel González-Zamora and José Martínez-Fernández
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(11), 1879; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16111879 - 24 May 2024
Viewed by 813
Abstract
This study analyzes the temporal patterns of rainfed cereal phenology extracted from the GIMMS NDVI3g dataset in the main cereal-growing regions under a Mediterranean climate in Spain, Portugal, France and Italy during the period 1982–2022. The series before and after the beginning of [...] Read more.
This study analyzes the temporal patterns of rainfed cereal phenology extracted from the GIMMS NDVI3g dataset in the main cereal-growing regions under a Mediterranean climate in Spain, Portugal, France and Italy during the period 1982–2022. The series before and after the beginning of the 21st century were analyzed separately. Phenological parameters were extracted using the modified dynamic threshold method, and their trends were analyzed. Correlation analyses were performed to study the relationships among these parameters and to analyze the influence of hydroclimatic variables on the start (SOS) and end (EOS) of the growing season. Results showed a temporal reversal in phenological trends between both study periods, coinciding with the global warming hiatus. In the first period (1982–2002), SOS and EOS advanced (−7.5 and −3.1 days, respectively), and the length of growing season (LOS) increased. However, during the second stage (2003–2022), SOS and EOS were delayed (7.5 and 1.7 days, respectively), and LOS decreased. Similar dynamics were observed for the influence of the hydroclimatic variables on SOS and EOS, stronger in the first period and weaker in the second. This study provides valuable information on the phenological dynamics of rainfed cereals that may be useful for their management and planning in climate change scenarios. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Sensing and Image Processing in Agricultural Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the cereal zones in the study regions: Castilla y León (CL) and Castilla La Mancha (CM) in Spain; Alentejo (AT) in Portugal; Occitanie (OC) in France; and Puglia (PG) in Italy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The technical flow chart of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Application of the modified dynamic threshold method on the NDVI series throughout the agricultural year to extract the phenological parameters: start (SOS), end (EOS), length (LOS) of the growing season, booting stage (BS), and the NDVI value in the BS (BV). BV is the maximum NDVI value within the growing season, “x” is the minimum NDVI value on the left side of BV and “b” is the minimum value on the right side of BV. The black arrow indicates the retrieval of the BS date from BV. “a<sub>1</sub>” denotes the difference between BV and x, while “a<sub>2</sub>” denotes the difference between BV and b; these are the amplitudes used to retrieve SOS and EOS, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Histograms of the distributions of the start (SOS), end (EOS), length (LOS) of the growing season, booting stage (BS), and the NDVI value in the BS (BV) differences between the last (2013–2022) and first (1982–1992) decades of the study period at the pixel scale in Castilla y León (CL), Castilla La Mancha (CM), Alentejo (AT), Occitanie (OC) and Puglia (PG). Values equal to 0 are excluded from the percentages (advance, red; delay, blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average monthly mean temperature (°C) of the study regions from 1982 to 2022 and the regression lines and their equations for the period associated with the global warming hiatus (green) and the periods before (red) and after (blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of the differences in the start (SOS), end (EOS) and length (LOS) of the growing season, between the two decades (1993–2002 minus 1982–1992) of the first period and of the second period (2013–2022 minus 2003–2012), represented at the pixel scale in Castilla y León (CL), Castilla La Mancha (CM), Alentejo (AT), Occitanie (OC) and Puglia (PG).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Histograms of the distributions of the differences in the start (SOS), end (EOS) and length (LOS) of the growing season between the second (1993–2002) and first (1982–1992) decade (Decade 2–1, brown) and between the fourth (2013–2022) and third (2003–2012) decade (Decade 4–3, blue), represented at the pixel scale in in Castilla y León (CL), Castilla La Mancha (CM), Alentejo (AT), Occitanie (OC) and Puglia (PG). Values equal to 0 are excluded from the percentages (advance, red; delay, blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Histograms of the distribution of the differences in the booting stage (BS) and the NDVI value in the BS (BV) between the second (1993–2002) and first (1982–1992) decade (Decade 2–1, brown) and between the fourth (2013–2022) and third (2003–2012) decade (Decade 4–3, blue), represented at the pixel scale in Castilla y León (CL), Castilla La Mancha (CM), Alentejo (AT), Occitanie (OC) and Puglia (PG). Values equal to 0 are excluded from the percentages (advance, red; delay, blue).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 9215 KiB  
Article
Changes in Vegetation NDVI and Its Response to Climate Change and Human Activities in the Ferghana Basin from 1982 to 2015
by Heli Zhang, Lu Li, Xiaoen Zhao, Feng Chen, Jiachang Wei, Zhimin Feng, Tiyuan Hou, Youping Chen, Weipeng Yue, Huaming Shang, Shijie Wang and Mao Hu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(7), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071296 - 6 Apr 2024
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2188
Abstract
Exploring the evolution of vegetation cover and its drivers in the Ferghana Basin helps to understand the current ecological status of the Ferghana Basin and to analyze the vegetation changes and drivers, with a view to providing a scientific basis for regional ecological [...] Read more.
Exploring the evolution of vegetation cover and its drivers in the Ferghana Basin helps to understand the current ecological status of the Ferghana Basin and to analyze the vegetation changes and drivers, with a view to providing a scientific basis for regional ecological and environmental management and planning. Based on GIMMS NDVI3g and meteorological data, the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of NDVI were analyzed from multiple perspectives with the help of linear trend and Mann–Kendall (MK) test methods using arcgis and the R language spatial analysis module, combined with partial correlation coefficients and residual analysis methods to analyze the impacts of climate change and human activities on the regional vegetation cover of the Ferghana Basin from 1982 to 2015. NDVI driving forces. The results showed the following: (1) The growing season of vegetation NDVI in the Ferghana Basin showed an increasing trend in the 34-year period, with an increase rate of 0.0044/10a, and the spatial distribution was significantly different, which was high in the central part of the country and low in the northern and southern parts of the country. (2) Temperature and precipitation simultaneously co-influenced the vegetation NDVI growth season, with most of the temperature and precipitation contributing in the spring, most of the temperature in the summer being negatively phased and the precipitation positively correlated, and most of the temperature and precipitation in the fall inhibiting vegetation NDVI growth. (3) The combined effect of climate change and human activities was the main reason for the overall rapid increase and great spatial variations in vegetation NDVI in China, and the spatial distribution of drivers, namely human activities and climate change, contributed 44.6% to vegetation NDVI in the growing season. The contribution of climate change and human activities to vegetation NDVI in the Ferghana Basin was 62.32% and 93.29%, respectively. The study suggests that more attention should be paid to the role of human activities and climate change in vegetation restoration to inform ecosystem management and green development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area in the Ferghana Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Thirty-meter land cover types in the Ferghana Basin, 2010, 10—Rainfed cropland, 11—Herbaceous cover, 20—Irrigated cropland, 61—Open deciduous broadleaved forest, 62—Closed deciduous broadleaved forest, 71—Open evergreen needle-leaved forest, 72—Closed evergreen needle-leaved forest, 81—Open deciduous needle-leaved forest, 82—Closed deciduous needle-leaved forest, 120—Shrubland, 122—Deciduous shrubland, 130—Grassland, 140—Lichens and mosses, 150—Sparse vegetation, 180—Wetlands, 190—Impervious surfaces, 200—Bare areas, 201—Consolidated bare areas, 202—Unconsolidated bare areas, 210—Water body, 220—Permanent ice and snow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Interannual change of NDVI during developing season in the Ferghana Basin from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of multi-year mean NDVI in vegetation growing season from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Significant distribution of NDVI changes in vegetation growing season from 1982 to 2015. (<b>A</b>): NDVI trend, (<b>B</b>): NDVI Trend Significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Coefficient of variation of NDVI in the study area, 1982–2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Interannual and growing season variations in climate factors in the study area, 1982−2015. (<b>A</b>): April−October factors; (<b>B</b>): Annual factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of biased correlations between NDVI and climate factors for growing season vegetation from 1982−2015. (<b>A</b>): Growing season NDVI is biased with precipitation; (<b>B</b>): Growing season NDVI is biased with temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>): Spring, summer, and autumn vegetation NDVI bias correlation with precipitation; (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>): Spring, summer, and autumn vegetation NDVI bias correlation with temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of the impacts of climatic change and human activities on vegetation restoration in Ferghana Basin during 1982–2015. (<b>A</b>): Climate change; (<b>B</b>): Human activities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of driving factors of vegetation cover change in the Ferghana Basin from 1982 to 2015 (CC and HA refer to climate change and human activities, respectively), ↑ represents an increase, ↓ represents a decrease.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Spatial distribution of the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to vegetation cover change in the Ferghana Basin from 1982 to 2015. (<b>A</b>): Climate change; (<b>B</b>): Human activities.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 20899 KiB  
Article
Phenological Changes and Their Influencing Factors under the Joint Action of Water and Temperature in Northeast Asia
by Jia Wang, Suxin Meng, Weihong Zhu and Zhen Xu
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(22), 5298; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225298 - 9 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1514
Abstract
Phenology is an important indicator for how plants will respond to environmental changes and is closely related to biomass production. Due to global warming and the emergence of intermittent warming, vegetation in northeast Asia is undergoing drastic changes. Understanding vegetation phenology and its [...] Read more.
Phenology is an important indicator for how plants will respond to environmental changes and is closely related to biomass production. Due to global warming and the emergence of intermittent warming, vegetation in northeast Asia is undergoing drastic changes. Understanding vegetation phenology and its response to climate change is of great significance to understanding the changes in the sustainable development of ecosystems. Based on Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)3g data, and the mean value of phenological results extracted by five methods, combined with climatic data, this study analyzed the temporal changes in phenology and the responses to climatic factors of five vegetation types of broad-leaved, needle-leaf, mixed forests, grassland, and cultivated land in northeast Asia over 33 years (1982–2014). The results showed that, during the intermittent warming period (1999–2014), the start of the growing season (SOS) advancement (Julian days) trend of all vegetation types decreased. During 1982–2014, the average temperature sensitivity of the SOS was 1.5 d/°C. The correlation between the SOS and the pre-season temperature is significant in northeast Asia, while the correlation between the EOS and the pre-season precipitation is greater than that between temperature and radiation. The impact of radiation changes on the SOS is relatively small. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Remote Sensing in Forest Landscapes II)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution of vegetation, and (<b>b</b>) dry and wet regions of northeast Asia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial patterns of long-term averaged (<b>a</b>) SOS, (<b>b</b>) EOS, and (<b>c</b>) GSL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution trend of SOS, EOS, and GSL during different time periods in northeast Asia (A and D represent the proportions of advanced and delayed pixels, respectively, and the black dots show the pixels with statistically significant phenological trends when <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the spatial distribution diagrams of the temporal change trends of spring and autumn phenology and growth season duration from 1982 to 2014, respectively; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the spring and autumn phenology and growth season duration from 1982 to 1998, respectively; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) represent the spatial distribution diagrams of the temporal change trend of the spring and autumn phenology and the duration of the growing season from 1999 to 2014, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The change trend of SOS and EOS pre-season climatic factors during different time periods in northeast Asia. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the change trend of SOS pre-season temperature, precipitation, and radiation during 1982–2014; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the change trend of SOS pre-season temperature, precipitation, and radiation during 1982–1998; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) represent the change trend of SOS pre-season temperature, precipitation, and radiation during 1999–2014; (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) represent the EOS pre-season temperature, precipitation, and radiation during 1982–2014; (<b>m</b>–<b>o</b>) represent the EOS pre-season temperature, precipitation, and radiation during 1982–1998; (<b>p</b>–<b>r</b>) represent the EOS pre-season temperature, precipitation, and radiation during 1999–2014. Black dots represent significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The spatial distribution and relative contribution diagrams of partial correlation between vegetation spring phenology and pre-season climatic factors during different time periods in northeast Asia. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent pre-season temperatures; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent pre-season precipitation; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) represent pre-season radiation; and (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) represent the relative contribution of climatic factors to vegetation spring phenology during three time periods. Black dots represent significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The spatial distribution and relative contribution diagrams of partial correlation between autumn vegetation phenology and pre-season climatic factors during different time periods in northeast Asia. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent pre-season temperatures; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent pre-season precipitation; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) represent pre-season radiation; and (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) represent the relative contribution of climatic factors to spring vegetation phenology during three time periods. Black dots represent significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes in the sensitivity of the SOS (EOS) to pre-season climatic factors of different vegetation types in northeast Asia before and after the warming interval. (<b>a</b>) Changes in the sensitivity of vegetation spring phenology to pre-season climatic factors from 1982 to 2014; (<b>b</b>) 1982 to 1998; and (<b>c</b>) 1999 to 2014. (<b>d</b>) Changes in the sensitivity of autumn phenology of vegetation to pre-season climatic factors from 1982 to 2014, (<b>e</b>) 1982 to 1998, and (<b>f</b>) 1999 to 2014. (Red represents temperature, blue represents precipitation, green represents solar radiation). * represents significance.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 7251 KiB  
Article
Spring Phenology Outweighs Temperature for Controlling the Autumn Phenology in the Yellow River Basin
by Moxi Yuan, Xinxin Li, Sai Qu, Zuoshi Wen and Lin Zhao
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(20), 5058; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15205058 - 21 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1687
Abstract
Recent research has revealed that the dynamics of autumn phenology play a decisive role in the inter-annual changes in the carbon cycle. However, to date, the shifts in autumn phenology (EGS) and the elements that govern it have not garnered unanimous acknowledgment. This [...] Read more.
Recent research has revealed that the dynamics of autumn phenology play a decisive role in the inter-annual changes in the carbon cycle. However, to date, the shifts in autumn phenology (EGS) and the elements that govern it have not garnered unanimous acknowledgment. This paper focuses on the Yellow River Basin (YRB) ecosystem and systematically analyzes the dynamic characteristics of EGS and its multiple controls across the entire region and biomes from 1982 to 2015 based on the long-term GIMMS NDVI3g dataset. The results demonstrated that a trend toward a significant delay in EGS (p < 0.05) was detected and this delay was consistently observed across all biomes. By using the geographical detector model, the association between EGS and several main driving factors was quantified. The spring phenology (SGS) had the largest explanatory power among the interannual variations of EGS across the YRB, followed by preseason temperature. For different vegetation types, SGS and preseason precipitation were the dominant driving factors for the EGS in woody plants and grasslands, respectively, whereas the explanatory power for each driving factor on cultivated land was very weak. Furthermore, the EGS was controlled by drought at different timescales and the dominant timescales were concentrated in 1–3 accumulated months. Grasslands were more significantly influenced by drought than woody plants at the biome level. These findings validate the significance of SGS on the EGS in the YRB as well as highlight that both drought and SGS should be considered in autumn fall phenology models for improving the prediction accuracy under future climate change scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the YRB (<b>a</b>) and spatial pattern of mean air temperature (<b>b</b>), average annual precipitation (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution of the linear trend of EGS. Top-left inset illustrates the significance of the trend (pink denotes statistical significance at a 95% confidence level). Top-right inset plot shows the frequency distribution of EGS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average linear trend and standard deviation of EGS in different vegetation types across the YRB from 1982 to 2015. * indicates statistical significance at a 95% confidence level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of partial correlation coefficients between EGS and preseason temperature (<b>a</b>); preseason precipitation (<b>b</b>); and preseason solar radiation (<b>c</b>) in the YRB. Coefficient values of ±0.46 and ±0.36 are indicated at the 99% and 95% significance levels, respectively. Top-left insets represent the frequency distributions of the corresponding coefficients of which the values were indicated by the map legend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The frequency distribution of partial correlation coefficients between EGS and climatic factors for each vegetation type in the YRB: (<b>a</b>) deciduous coniferous forest; (<b>b</b>) evergreen coniferous forest; (<b>c</b>) deciduous broad-leaved forest; (<b>d</b>) grassland; (<b>e</b>) cultivated vegetation. Blue, red and yellow represent the frequency distribution of partial correlation coefficients between EGS and preseason precipitation, preseason temperature and preseason solar radiation, respectively. Texts in each subfigure present the percentage of partial correlations between EGS and preseason temperature, precipitation and solar radiation. P indicates a positive correlation, N indicates a negative correlation, the ratio in parentheses indicates the percentage of pixels at the 95% level of significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of partial correlation coefficients between EGS and SGS in the YRB during 1982–2015. Coefficient values of ±0.46 and ±0.36 are indicated at the 99% and 95% significance levels, respectively. The top-left inset represents the frequency distributions of the corresponding coefficients, of which the values were indicated by the map legend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Percentages of the partial correlation coefficient between EGS and SGS of different vegetation types from 1982 to 2015. Bars above 0 and below 0 represent the percentage of positive and negative correlations, respectively. Colored sections indicate the percentage of correlations that are statistically significant at the 95% level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of the maximum partial correlation coefficient between EGS and SPEI from 1982 to 2015 (<b>a</b>) and the corresponding time scales at which maximum partial correlation coefficient occurred are obtained (<b>b</b>). Coefficient values of ±0.46 and ±0.36 are indicated at the 99% and 95% significance levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Percentage of the R<sub>max</sub> between EGS and SPEI at different time scales (1- to 12-month) for each vegetation type: (<b>a</b>) deciduous coniferous forest; (<b>b</b>) evergreen coniferous forest; (<b>c</b>) deciduous broad-leaved forest; (<b>d</b>) grassland; (<b>e</b>) cultivated vegetation. Note: PS represents the ratio of pixels having a significant positive correlation between EGS and SPEI on a 1- to 12-month time scale to all the pixels within this vegetation type; NS represents the ratio of pixels having a significant negative correlation between EGS and SPEI on a 1- to 12-month time scale to all the pixels within this vegetation type.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5872 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Characteristics Prediction and Driving Factors Analysis of NPP in Shanxi Province Covering the Period 2001–2020
by Wanru Ba, Haitao Qiu, Yonggang Cao and Adu Gong
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 12070; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512070 - 7 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1946
Abstract
The advent of a range of high-precision NPP products, including MODIS NPP, MOD17 NPP, and GIMMS NPP, has sparked growing interest in the study of Earth’s ecosystems. In order to enhance comprehension of ecosystem health, in order to facilitate the development of rational [...] Read more.
The advent of a range of high-precision NPP products, including MODIS NPP, MOD17 NPP, and GIMMS NPP, has sparked growing interest in the study of Earth’s ecosystems. In order to enhance comprehension of ecosystem health, in order to facilitate the development of rational resource management and environmental conservation policies, this investigation employs the MOD17A3 dataset to analyze historical variations in Net Primary Productivity (NPP) within Shanxi Province from 2001 to 2020, while also exploring future trends. The Theil–Sen median trend analysis and Mann–Kendall test are commonly used methods for analyzing time series data, employed to study the spatiotemporal trends and variations in NPP. The Grey Wolf Optimization–Support Vector Machine (GWO–SVM) model combines optimization algorithms and machine learning methods, enhancing the predictive capacity of the model for future NPP time series changes. Conversely, the Hurst exponent utilizes historical NPP trends to assess the persistence characteristics of NPP and predict future spatial variations in NPP. This study additionally investigates the natural driving factors of NPP using the Geographic Detector approach. The key findings of this study are as follows. (1) Overall, NPP in Shanxi Province exhibits a fluctuating upward trend from 2001 to 2020, with an average value of 206.278 gCm−2a−1. Spatially, NPP exhibits a northwest–low and southeast–high pattern, with significant spatial heterogeneity and considerable variability. (2) The average Hurst exponent is 0.86, indicating a characteristic of strong persistence in growth in future NPP. Regions with strong or higher persistent growth account for 95.54% of the total area. (3) According to the CMIP6 climate scenarios, NPP is projected to gradually increase from 2025 to 2030. (4) The interactive effects between natural factors contribute more to NPP variations than individual factors, with the rainfall–elevation interaction having the highest contribution percentage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geographical location map of Shanxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The temporal variation characteristics of NPP in Shanxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial variation characteristics (<b>A</b>) and rate of NPP (<b>B</b>) in Shanxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation trend (<b>A</b>) and significance test of NPP (<b>B</b>) in Shanxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>NPP Hurst exponent of Shanxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Confusion matrix for validation dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The temporal variation characteristics of NPP in Shanxi Province from 2025 to 2030.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The relationship between NPP and both elevation (<b>A</b>) and slope (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlation coefficient between NPP and annual precipitation (<b>A</b>) and temperature (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 9703 KiB  
Article
Temporal and Spatial Change in Vegetation and Its Interaction with Climate Change in Argentina from 1982 to 2015
by Qi Long, Fei Wang, Wenyan Ge, Feng Jiao, Jianqiao Han, Hao Chen, Fidel Alejandro Roig, Elena María Abraham, Mengxia Xie and Lu Cai
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(7), 1926; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071926 - 3 Apr 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4504
Abstract
Studying vegetation change and its interaction with climate change is essential for regional ecological protection. Previous studies have demonstrated the impact of climate change on regional vegetation in South America; however, studies addressing the fragile ecological environment in Argentina are limited. Therefore, we [...] Read more.
Studying vegetation change and its interaction with climate change is essential for regional ecological protection. Previous studies have demonstrated the impact of climate change on regional vegetation in South America; however, studies addressing the fragile ecological environment in Argentina are limited. Therefore, we assessed the vegetation dynamics and their climatic feedback in five administrative regions of Argentina, using correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis methods. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index 3rd generation (NDVI3g) from Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling Studies (GIMMS) and climatic data from the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Land Data Assimilation System (FLDAS) were processed. The NDVI of the 1982–2015 period in Argentina showed a downward trend, varying from −1.75 to 0.69/decade. The NDVI in Northeast Argentina (NEA), Northwest Argentina (NWA), Pampas, and Patagonia significantly decreased. Precipitation was negatively correlated with the NDVI in western Patagonia, whereas temperature and solar radiation were positively correlated with the NDVI. Extreme precipitation and drought were essential causes of vegetation loss in Patagonia. The temperature (73.09%), precipitation (64.02%), and solar radiation (73.27%) in Pampas, Cuyo, NEA, and NWA were positively correlated with the NDVI. However, deforestation and farming and pastoral activities have caused vegetation destruction in Pampas, NEA, and NWA. Environmental protection policies and deforestation regulations should be introduced to protect the ecological environment. The results of this study clarify the reasons for the vegetation change in Argentina and provide a theoretical reference for dealing with climate change. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geographic distribution of the five administrative regions of Argentina. (<b>b</b>) Land cover in Argentina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Annual average temperature, (<b>b</b>) annual average precipitation, and (<b>c</b>) annual average solar radiation in Argentina from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Annual NDVI time series in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>b</b>) Monthly NDVI time series in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>c</b>) Mann–Kendall (M-K) test of the NDVI in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>d</b>) Seasonal NDVI time series in Argentina from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Average NDVI. (<b>b</b>) NDVI trend in Argentina from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>NDVI time series sample at individual pixels in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>) are the time series of selected sample pixels from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Correlation coefficient and (<b>b</b>) significance test of the NDVI and temperature in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>c</b>) Correlation coefficient and (<b>d</b>) significance test of the NDVI and precipitation in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>e</b>) Correlation coefficient and (<b>f</b>) significance test of the NDVI and solar radiation in Argentina from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) The slope of the predicted NDVI (<span class="html-italic">NDVI<sub>pre</sub></span>) in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. (<b>b</b>) The slope of the residual NDVI (<span class="html-italic">NDVI<sub>res</sub></span>) in Argentina from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Driving forces of vegetation change in Argentina from 1982 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4816 KiB  
Article
Assessing Vegetation Phenology across Different Biomes in Temperate China—Comparing GIMMS and MODIS NDVI Datasets
by Jiangtao Xiao, Ke Huang, Yang Lin, Ping Ren and Jiaxing Zu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(23), 6180; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236180 - 6 Dec 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2624
Abstract
Assessing vegetation phenology is very important for better understanding the impact of climate change on the ecosystem, and many vegetation index datasets from different remote sensors have been used to quantify vegetation phenology from a regional to global perspective. This study mainly analyzes [...] Read more.
Assessing vegetation phenology is very important for better understanding the impact of climate change on the ecosystem, and many vegetation index datasets from different remote sensors have been used to quantify vegetation phenology from a regional to global perspective. This study mainly analyzes the similarities and differences in phenology derived from GIMMS NDVI3g and MODIS NDVI datasets across different biomes throughout temperate China. We applied three commonly used methods to extract the start and end of the growing season (SOS and EOS) from two datasets between 2000 and 2015, and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics and trends of key phenological parameters between these two datasets in temperate China. Results showed that the multi-year mean GIMMS NDVI was higher than MODIS NDVI throughout most of temperate China, and the consistencies between GIMMS NDVI and MODIS NDVI for all biomes in the senescence phase were better than those in the green-up phase. NDVI differences between GIMMS and MODIS resulted in some distinctions between phenology derived from the two datasets. The results of SOS and EOS for three methods also showed wide discrepancies in spatial patterns, especially in SOS. For different biomes, differences of SOS in forests were obviously less than that in shrublands, grasslands-IM, grasslands-QT and meadows, whereas the differences of EOS in forests were relatively greater than that in SOS. Moreover, large differences of phenological trends were found between GIMMS and MODIS datasets from 2000 to 2015 in entire region and different biomes, and it is particularly noteworthy that both SOS and EOS showed a low proportion of the identical significant trends. The results suggested NDVI datasets obtained from GIMMS and MODIS sensors could induce the differences of the inversion of vegetation phenology in some degree due to the differences of instrumental characteristics between these two sensors. These findings highlighted that inter-calibrate datasets derived from different satellite sensors for some biomes (e.g., grasslands) should be needed when analyzing land surface phenology and their trends, and also provided baseline information for choosing different NDVI datasets in subsequent studies on vegetation patterns and dynamics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Eight biomes of temperate China, including deciduous needleleaf forests (DNF), evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF), mixed forests (MF), deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF), shrublands, grasslands in Inner Mongolia (GRA-IM), grasslands in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (GRA-QT), and meadows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Annual changes of the spatially mean NDVI based on the GIMMS and MODIS datasets during 2000–2015; (<b>b</b>) The scatter plot of the multi-year averaged NDVI for the two datasets from 2000–2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Discrepancy in the multi-year mean NDVI between GIMMS and MODIS datasets during 2000–2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mean annual NDVI from 2000 to 2015 between GIMMS and MODIS datasets for different biomes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Discrepancies of the multi-year mean SOS between GIMMS and MODIS datasets during 2000–2015 for different methods: (<b>a</b>) Asymmetric Gaussians (AG); (<b>b</b>) Double Logistic functions (DL); (<b>c</b>) Savitzky-Golay filter (SG).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Discrepancies of the multi-year mean EOS between GIMMS and MODIS datasets during 2000–2015 for different methods: (<b>a</b>) Asymmetric Gaussians (AG); (<b>b</b>) Double Logistic functions (DL); (<b>c</b>) Savitzky-Golay filter (SG).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Allocation of SOS discrepancy between GIMMS and MODIS datasets at 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, and more than 50 days, across eight biomes for different methods: (<b>a</b>) AG; (<b>b</b>) DL; (<b>c</b>) SG. (Number 1–8 represents DNF, ENF, MF, DBF, shrublands, grasslands-IM, grasslands-QT and meadows, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Allocation of EOS discrepancy between GIMMS and MODIS datasets at 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, and more than 50 days, across eight biomes for different methods: (<b>a</b>) AG; (<b>b</b>) DL; (<b>c</b>) SG. (Number 1–8 represents DNF, ENF, MF, DBF, shrublands, grasslands-IM, grasslands-QT and meadows, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The mean NDVI difference between GIMMS and MODIS during spring (March–May) and autumn (September–November).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 5553 KiB  
Article
Trend Analysis and Driving Factors of Vegetation Dynamics in Northern China from 1982 to 2015
by Rui Sun, Shaohui Chen and Hongbo Su
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(23), 6163; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236163 - 5 Dec 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2710
Abstract
Under the background of global warming, understanding the dynamic of vegetation plays a key role in revealing the structure and function of an ecosystem. Assessing the impact of climate change and human activities on vegetation dynamics is crucial for policy formulation and ecological [...] Read more.
Under the background of global warming, understanding the dynamic of vegetation plays a key role in revealing the structure and function of an ecosystem. Assessing the impact of climate change and human activities on vegetation dynamics is crucial for policy formulation and ecological protection. Based on the Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling System (GIMMS) third generation of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI3g), meteorological data and land cover data, this study analyzed the linear and nonlinear trends of vegetation in northern China from 1982 to 2015, and quantified the relative impact of climate change and human activities on vegetation change. The results showed that more than 53% of the vegetation had changed significantly, and 36.64% of the vegetation had a reverse trend. There were potential risks of vegetation degradation in the southwestern, northwestern and northeastern parts of the study’s area. The linear analysis method cannot disclose the reversal of the vegetation growth trend, which will underestimate or overestimate the risk of vegetation degradation or restoration. Climate change and human activities promoted 76.54% of the vegetation growth in the study area, with an average contribution rate of 51.22% and 48.78%, respectively, while the average contribution rate to the vegetation degradation area was 47.43% and 52.57%, respectively. Vegetation restoration of grassland and woodland was mainly affected by climate change, and human activities dominated their degradation, while cropland vegetation was opposite. The contribution rate of human activities to vegetation change in the southeastern and eastern parts of the study area was generally higher than that of climate change, but it was the opposite in the high altitude area, with obvious spatial heterogeneity. These results are helpful to understand the dynamic mechanism of vegetation in northern China, and provide a scientific basis for vegetation restoration and protection of regional ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of the study area (<b>a</b>); elevation and climate zone (<b>b</b>); unchanged land cover (<b>c</b>), precipitation conditions (<b>d</b>); and temperature zone (<b>e</b>) in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Four different types of NDVI EEMD trends.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow chart of the NDVI analysis methods and processes in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Interannual variation trend of mean GSN of the study area and three different vegetation cover types. The red and blue lines indicate the linear and nonlinear trends, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of NDVI liner trend (<b>a</b>) and its significance (<b>c</b>), the average EEMD trend (<b>b</b>) and its significance (<b>d</b>) in growing season (Non-sig: Non-significant, G to B: Greening to browning, B to G: Browning to greening, G to G: Monotonic greening, B to B: Monotonic browning).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The average trend for EEMD before (<b>a</b>) and after (<b>b</b>) the turning point (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Before and after the turning point, the significance of PCC between NDVI and temperature (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), precipitation (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) and solar radiation (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) and the spatial distribution pattern of climate control factor (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) in the growing season. Tem, Pre, SR represent temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The significance of PCC between NDVI with monotonic trend and non-significant trend and temperature (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), precipitation (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) and solar radiation (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) and the spatial distribution pattern of climate control factor (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) in the growing season. Tem, Pre, SR represent temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The relative contribution of climate change (<b>a</b>) and human activities (<b>b</b>) to vegetation change, and the spatial distribution of driving forces of vegetation dynamics (<b>c</b>). (ICH: NDVI increase caused by climate change and human activity; IHA: NDVI increase caused by human activity; ICC: NDVI increase caused by climate change; DCH: NDVI decrease caused by climate change and human activity; DCC: NDVI decrease caused by climate change; DHA: NDVI decrease caused by human activity).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4569 KiB  
Article
Varying Responses of Vegetation Greenness to the Diurnal Warming across the Global
by Jie Zhao, Kunlun Xiang, Zhitao Wu and Ziqiang Du
Plants 2022, 11(19), 2648; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192648 - 8 Oct 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 1776
Abstract
The distribution of global warming has been varying both diurnally and seasonally. Little is known about the spatiotemporal variations in the relationships between vegetation greenness and day- and night-time warming during the last decades. We investigated the global inter- and intra-annual responses of [...] Read more.
The distribution of global warming has been varying both diurnally and seasonally. Little is known about the spatiotemporal variations in the relationships between vegetation greenness and day- and night-time warming during the last decades. We investigated the global inter- and intra-annual responses of vegetation greenness to the diurnal asymmetric warming during the period of 1982–2015, using the normalized different vegetation index (NDVI, a robust proxy for vegetation greenness) obtained from the NOAA/AVHRR NDVI GIMMS3g dataset and the monthly average daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum temperature (Tmin) obtained from the gridded Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia. Several findings were obtained: (1) The strength of the relationship between vegetation greenness and the diurnal temperature varied on inter-annual and seasonal timescales, indicating generally weakening warming effects on the vegetation activity across the global. (2) The decline in vegetation response to Tmax occurred mainly in the mid-latitudes of the world and in the high latitudes of the northern hemisphere, whereas the decline in the vegetation response to Tmin primarily concentrated in low latitudes. The percentage of areas with a significantly negative trend in the partial correlation coefficient between vegetation greenness and diurnal temperature was greater than that of the areas showing the significant positive trend. (3) The trends in the correlation between vegetation greenness and diurnal warming showed a complex spatial pattern: the majority of the study areas had undergone a significant declining strength in the vegetation greenness response to Tmax in all seasons and to Tmin in seasons except autumn. These findings are expected to have important implications for studying the diurnal asymmetry warming and its effect on the terrestrial ecosystem. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Temporal variations in the partial correlation coefficients between mean annual NDVI and the diurnal temperature (T<sub>max</sub> and T<sub>min</sub>) for each 17-year moving window across latitudes intervals. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b> represents latitudes intervals at 60°~90° N, 30°~60° N, 0°~30° N, −30°~0° S, and −60°~0° S, respectively (N and S indicates the Northern and southern hemisphere, respectively). The x axis is the last year of the 17-year moving-window (for example, 1998 stands for a moving-window from 1982 to 1998, …, 2015 stands for a moving-window from 1999 to 2015). The Y axis is the partial correlation coefficients).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal variations in the partial correlation coefficients between mean NDVI and the diurnal temperature (T<sub>max</sub> and T<sub>min</sub>) in spring for each 17-year moving window across latitudes intervals. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b> represents latitudes intervals at 60°~90° N, 30°~60° N, 0°~30° N, −30°~0° S, and −60°~0° S, respectively (N and S indicates the Northern and southern hemisphere, respectively). The x axis is the last year of the 17-year moving-window (for example, 1998 stands for a moving-window from 1982 to 1998,…, 2015 stands for a moving-window from 1999 to 2015). The Y axis is the partial correlation coefficients).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temporal variations in the partial correlation coefficients between mean NDVI and the diurnal temperature (T<sub>max</sub> and T<sub>min</sub>) in summer for each 17-year moving window across latitudes intervals. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b> represents latitudes intervals at 60°~90° N, 30°~60° N, 0°~30° N, −30°~0° S, and −60°~0° S, respectively (N and S indicates the Northern and southern hemisphere, respectively). The x axis is the last year of the 17-year moving-window (for example, 1998 stands for a moving-window from 1982 to 1998,…, 2015 stands for a moving-window from 1999 to 2015). The Y axis is the partial correlation coefficients).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temporal variations in the partial correlation coefficients between mean NDVI and the diurnal temperature (T<sub>max</sub> and T<sub>min</sub>) in autumn for each 17-year moving window across latitudes intervals. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b> represents latitudes intervals at 60°~90° N, 30°~60° N, 0°~30° N, −30°~0° S, and −60°~0° S, respectively (N and S indicates the Northern and southern hemisphere, respectively). The x axis is the last year of the 17-year moving-window (for example, 1998 stands for a moving-window from 1982 to 1998,…, 2015 stands for a moving-window from 1999 to 2015). The Y axis is the partial correlation coefficients).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal variations in the partial correlation coefficients between mean NDVI and the diurnal temperature (T<sub>max</sub> and T<sub>min</sub>) in winter for each 17-year moving window across latitudes intervals. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b> represents latitudes intervals at 60°~90° N, 30°~60° N, 0°~30° N, −30°~0° S, and −60°~0° S, respectively (N and S indicates the Northern and southern hemisphere, respectively). The x axis is the last year of the 17-year moving-window (for example, 1998 stands for a moving-window from 1982 to 1998,…, 2015 stands for a moving-window from 1999 to 2015). The Y axis is the partial correlation coefficients).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The response of vegetation greenness to the diurnal temperature. (<b>a</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between mean annual NDVI and T<sub>max</sub>. <b>b</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between mean annual NDVI and T<sub>min</sub>. <a href="#app1-plants-11-02648" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The response of vegetation greenness to the diurnal temperature in spring. (<b>a</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between spring NDVI and T<sub>max</sub>. <b>b</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between spring NDVI and T<sub>min</sub>. <a href="#app1-plants-11-02648" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The response of vegetation greenness to the diurnal temperature in summer. (<b>a</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between summer NDVI and T<sub>max</sub>. <b>b</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between summer NDVI and T<sub>min</sub>. <a href="#app1-plants-11-02648" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The response of vegetation greenness to the diurnal temperature in autumn. (<b>a</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between autumn NDVI and T<sub>max</sub>. <b>b</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between autumn NDVI and T<sub>min</sub>. <a href="#app1-plants-11-02648" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S4</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The response of vegetation greenness to the diurnal temperature in winter. (<b>a</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between winter NDVI and T<sub>max</sub>. <b>b</b>. spatial distribution of the temporal trend of the partial coefficients between winter NDVI and T<sub>min</sub>. <a href="#app1-plants-11-02648" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S5</a>).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4329 KiB  
Article
Greater Greening Trend in the Loess Plateau of China Inferred from Long-Term Remote Sensing Data: Patterns, Causes and Implications
by Wei Guo, Hao He, Xiaoting Li and Weigang Zeng
Forests 2022, 13(10), 1630; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101630 - 5 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2035
Abstract
The Loess Plateau (LP) of China, which is the pilot region of the “Grain to Green Project” (GGP), has received worldwide attention due to its significant changes in the natural and social environment. Investigation of vegetation variations in response to climate change and [...] Read more.
The Loess Plateau (LP) of China, which is the pilot region of the “Grain to Green Project” (GGP), has received worldwide attention due to its significant changes in the natural and social environment. Investigation of vegetation variations in response to climate change and human activities is vital for providing support for further ecological restoration planning. This paper aimed to monitor vegetation dynamics of the LP with trend comparisons of various vegetation types, disentangle the effects of climate variations and ecological programs on vegetation variations, and detect the consistency of vegetation variations. More specifically, vegetation dynamics during 1982–2015 were analyzed using the Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping System third-generation Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GIMMS NDVI3g) data with the application of Breaks for Additive Season and Trend (BFAST) and Hurst Exponent. The results showed that: (1) Vegetation manifested a significant greening trend (0.013 decade−1p < 0.01) in the LP during 1982–2015, and a breakpoint (BP) was detected in 1999, which was the beginning of the GGP. Interannual NDVI after the BP (ABP) showed more than 3.5 times greening rates compared to the NDVI before the BP (BBP). (2) Human activities dominated the vegetation variation (accounted for 59.46% of vegetation variation), among which reforestation and land-use change with steep slopes (i.e., ≥15°) lead to the greening after the GGP implementation. (3) Future trends should be noticed in the Forest Zone and Forest-Grass Zone, where the greening trends tend to slow down or even reverse in the southern LP. The long-term GIMMS NDVI3g time series and multiple geospatial analyses of this study might facilitate a better understanding of the mechanisms of vegetation variations for the assessment of the large restoration programs in fragile ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Climate Change Revealed by Tree Rings and Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the Loess Plateau (LP) and its bioclimatic zone division.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Inter-annual variability of regionally averaged NDVI in the LP and (<b>b</b>) original NDVI time series, (<b>c</b>) seasonal, (<b>d</b>) trend, and (<b>e</b>) residual components of the NDVI time series decomposed by Breaks for Additive Season and Trend (BFAST). The breakpoint (BP) are black dashed lines and the confidence interval on the 0.05 level is grey-inked in the trend component.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Interannual variations in NDVI of (<b>a</b>) interannual scale, (<b>b</b>) spring, (<b>c</b>) summer, and (<b>d</b>) autumn in the LP from 1982 to 2015. The lines in red and blue represent the NDVI trend before the BP (BBP, 1982–1999) and after the BP (ABP, 2000–2015), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial patterns of the NDVI changes and corresponding <span class="html-italic">p</span> values for (<b>a</b>) 1982–2015; (<b>b</b>) 1982–1999 (BBP); (<b>c</b>) 2000–2015 (ABP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Trends of NDVI variation in five bioclimatic zones over different periods. (<b>a</b>) Average changing rate; (<b>b</b>) Percentage of the greening area with significant (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) variations of NDVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Hurst exponent spatial distribution and (<b>b</b>) frequency distribution histogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial patterns of 34 years of mean (<b>a</b>) NDVI, (<b>b</b>) temperature, (<b>c</b>) precipitation, and (<b>d</b>) solar radiation in the LP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Trends of climatic factors variation and its relations to NDVI changes. The left panel represents interannual variations in (<b>a</b>) temperature, (<b>b</b>) precipitation, and (<b>c</b>) solar radiation over different periods. The right panel represents the relationship between NDVI and (<b>d</b>) temperature, (<b>e</b>) precipitation, and (<b>f</b>) solar radiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distributions of response relationships between NDVI and (<b>a</b>) temperature, (<b>b</b>) precipitation, and (<b>c</b>) solar radiation. The absolute values of <span class="html-italic">R</span> greater than 0.339 represent significant correlations (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Land-use change of the LP in ABP: (<b>a</b>) Land use transition among different land types, and changes of (<b>b</b>) croplands, (<b>c</b>) forests, (<b>d</b>) grasslands, and (<b>e</b>) construction land.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Slope map of the LP, and (<b>b</b>) NDVI variation trends in different slopes.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 13086 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Driving Factors of Vegetation Change in the Pan-Third Pole Region
by Xuyan Yang, Qinke Yang and Miaomiao Yang
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(17), 4402; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174402 - 4 Sep 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2443
Abstract
The Pan-Third Pole (PTP) region, one of the areas with the most intense global warming, has seen substantial changes in vegetation cover. Based on the GIMMS NDVI3g and meteorological dataset from 1982 to 2015, this study evaluated the spatio-temporal variation in fractional vegetation [...] Read more.
The Pan-Third Pole (PTP) region, one of the areas with the most intense global warming, has seen substantial changes in vegetation cover. Based on the GIMMS NDVI3g and meteorological dataset from 1982 to 2015, this study evaluated the spatio-temporal variation in fractional vegetation coverage (FVC) by using linear regression analysis, standard deviation, correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression residuals to explore its response mechanism to climate change and human activities. The findings showed that: (1) the FVC was progressively improved, with a linear trend of 0.003•10a−1. (2) The largest proportion of the contribution to FVC change was found in the unchanged area (39.29%), followed by the obvious improvement (23.83%) and the mild improvement area (13.53%). (3) The impact of both climate change and human activities is dual in FVC changes, and human activities are increasing. (4) The FVC was positively correlated with temperature and precipitation, with a stronger correlation with temperature, and the climate trend was warm and humid. The findings of the study serve to understand the impacts of climate change and human activities on the dynamic changes in the FVC and provide a scientific foundation for ecological conservation and sustainable economic development in the PTP region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Correlation between NDVI and Crop Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Subregions map in the Pan-Third Pole region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Map showing flowchart of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Inter-annual variations in annual mean <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> in the Pan-Third Pole region during 1982–2015 (<b>a</b>); inter-annual variations standard deviation of <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> (<b>b</b>); spatial pattern in mean <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> (<b>c</b>); and change trend of <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> based on pixels (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Inter-annual variations in annual mean <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> of subregions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Samples and Land use map of Pan-Third Pole region based on IGBP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Histograms of <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> trend in seven samples (S1–S7 denote Sample1–7, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Histograms of <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> trend in seven samples (S1–S7 denote Sample1–7, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Change trends of <span class="html-italic">FVC<sub>CC</sub></span> in the Pan-Third Pole region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Impact of climate changes on <span class="html-italic">FVC<sub>CC</sub></span> in subregions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Change trends of <span class="html-italic">FVC<sub>HA</sub></span> in the Pan-Third Pole region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Impact of human activities on <span class="html-italic">FVC<sub>HA</sub></span> in subregions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of driving factors of <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> changes in the Pan-Third Pole region from 1982 to 2015 (CC and HA represent climate change and human activities, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Inter-annual variations in annual mean temperature in subregions (<b>a</b>); inter-annual variations in annual precipitation in subregions (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Distribution of annual mean temperature from 1982 to 2015 (<b>a</b>); change trend of annual mean temperature from 1982 to 2015 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Distribution of annual precipitation from 1982 to 2015 (<b>a</b>); change trend of annual precipitation from 1982 to 2015 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> and temperature in the Pan-Third Pole region (<b>a</b>); test of significance between <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> and temperature in the Pan-Third Pole region (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> and precipitation in the Pan-Third Pole region (<b>a</b>); test of significance between <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> and precipitation in the Pan-Third Pole region (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p><span class="html-italic">FVC</span> change with elevation in PTP region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Area proportion of <span class="html-italic">FVC</span> change types at different elevation gradients in PTP region.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 8394 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Variations in Drought and Vegetation Response in Inner Mongolia from 1982 to 2019
by Yujiao Wei, Lin Zhu, Yun Chen, Xinyu Cao and Huilin Yu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(15), 3803; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153803 - 7 Aug 2022
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 3198
Abstract
Drought events cause ecological problems, including reduced water resources and degraded vegetation. Quantifying vegetation responses to drought is essential for ecological management. However, in existing research, the response relationships (correlations and lags) were typically determined based on Pearson correlation coefficient and the resultant [...] Read more.
Drought events cause ecological problems, including reduced water resources and degraded vegetation. Quantifying vegetation responses to drought is essential for ecological management. However, in existing research, the response relationships (correlations and lags) were typically determined based on Pearson correlation coefficient and the resultant lag times were constrained by the spatial and temporal resolutions of the analyzed data. Inner Mongolia is an important ecological barrier in northern China. Ecological security is one of the most concerned issues of the region’s sustainable development. Herein, we combined Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) with Systeme Probatoire d’Observation de la Terra-vegetation (SPOT-VGT) NDVI data through spatial downscaling. The obtained 1 km-resolution NDVI dataset spanning Inner Mongolia from 1982 to 2019 was used to represent the refined vegetation distribution. The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) derived from gridded meteorological data was used to measure drought over the same period. We investigated the spatiotemporal characteristics of vegetation and drought in the region in the past 38 years. We then discussed changes in different vegetation responses to drought across eastern Inner Mongolia using cross wavelet transform (XWT) and wavelet coherence (WTC). The results reveal that in 82.4% of the study area, NDVI exhibited rising trends, and the SPEI values exhibited declining trends in 78.5% of the area. In eastern Inner Mongolia, the grassland NDVI was positively correlated with SPEI and significantly affected by drought events, while NDVI in forestlands, including shrubs, broad-leaved forests, and coniferous forests, was negatively correlated with SPEI in the short term and weakly affected by drought. The NDVI lag times behind SPEI in grasslands, coniferous forests, and broad-leaved forests were 1–1.5, 4.5, and 7–7.5 months, respectively. These findings provide a scientific foundation for environmental preservation in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ecological Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>An overview of Inner Mongolia and vegetation type in 2019. (<b>a</b>) shows the geographic location, administrative division, elevation, and distribution of major rivers in Inner Mongolia. Digital elevation model (DEM) data was downloaded from Google Earth Engine (<a href="https://earthengine.google.com/" target="_blank">https://earthengine.google.com/</a>, accessed on 11 December 2021). The vector data of administrative boundaries, rivers, and lakes were from China’s 4 million basic geographic database. (<b>b</b>) shows the distribution of vegetation types in 2019 and the three parts according to the “China Meteorological Geographical Division”. The vegetation type data came from the European Space Agency’s global land cover dataset (<a href="http://maps.elie.ucl.a-c.be.CCI/viewer" target="_blank">http://maps.elie.ucl.a-c.be.CCI/viewer</a>, accessed on 11 December 2021). The eastern part is a typical area for exploring the response of different types of vegetation to drought.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the methods used in this study. In the figure, TR represents temporal resolution and SR represents spatial resolution. Parallelograms represent datasets and rectangles represent research methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison between the downscaled NDVI and SPOT-VGT NDVI data in 1999 using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Black points are 1000 randomly selected pixels, and the red line is the fitting line. The fitting line equation is <span class="html-italic">y</span> = 0.93<span class="html-italic">x</span> + 0.027, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of the average NDVI values (<b>a</b>) and its grading (<b>b</b>) in Inner Mongolia from 1982 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Change trend of the annual NDVI over time. The black points are the average value of NDVI of Inner Mongolia in each year. The red line is the trend fitting line. The slope of the trend line is 0.0015, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Change trend of NDVI in four seasons over time. The slopes of trend lines in spring, summer, autumn, and winter are −0.00076, 0.00152, 0.00054, and −0.00095, respectively (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Change trends and significance tests of the annual NDVI in space in Inner Mongolia. (<b>a</b>) shows the 38-year NDVI change trend values in Inner Mongolia calculated by Theil–Sen median trend analysis. Values greater than 0 represent vegetation improvement, and values less than 0 represent vegetation degradation. (<b>b</b>) are the results from superposition of the Theil–Sen trend analysis and the Mann–Kendall test, showing the significance of vegetation change trends.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Significance tests of NDVI spatial change trend in four seasons in Inner Mongolia. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SPEI-12 fluctuations in Inner Mongolia. The gradient color block represents the change of SPEI-12. Blue indicates wetting and orange indicates aridity. The blue dotted line indicates an SPEI value of −0.5, which is the boundary between drought conditions and non-drought conditions. The red dotted line indicates severe drought.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Change trend of SPEI over time. The blue bar chart is the long-term average value of SPEI in Inner Mongolia. The red line is the trendline. The slope of the trend line is −0.034, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. The black dotted line is the threshold for drought occurrence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Change trends and significance tests of SPEI in space in Inner Mongolia. (<b>a</b>) shows the 38-year SPEI change trend values in Inner Mongolia calculated by the Theil–Sen median trend analysis. Values greater than 0 represent wetting, and values less than 0 represent aridity. (<b>b</b>) are the results from the superposition of the Theil–Sen trend analysis and the Mann–Kendall test, showing the significance of drought change trends.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The correlation and corresponding significance between NDVI and SPEI in Inner Mongolia. (<b>a</b>) shows the correlation coefficient between NDVI and SPEI for 38 years in Inner Mongolia using Pearson correlation analysis. (<b>b</b>) are the results from the superposition of the correlation coefficient and t test showing the significance of the correlation between vegetation and drought.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>XWT power spectrum results of SPEI and NDVI of grasslands (<b>a</b>), shrubs (<b>b</b>), broad-leaved forests (<b>c</b>), and coniferous forests (<b>d</b>). The red and blue regions in the figures indicate the peak and valley values of energy density, respectively. The color shades represent the relative changes in energy density. The values enclosed within the thick black solid contour represent those that passed the red noise test at the 95% confidence level, while the conical area within the thin black solid line is the cone of influence (COI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>XWT power spectrum results of SPEI and NDVI of grasslands (<b>a</b>), shrubs (<b>b</b>), broad-leaved forests (<b>c</b>), and coniferous forests (<b>d</b>). The red and blue regions in the figures indicate the peak and valley values of energy density, respectively. The color shades represent the relative changes in energy density. The values enclosed within the thick black solid contour represent those that passed the red noise test at the 95% confidence level, while the conical area within the thin black solid line is the cone of influence (COI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>WTC condensation spectrum results of SPEI and NDVI of grasslands (<b>a</b>), shrubs (<b>b</b>), broad-leaved forests (<b>c</b>), and coniferous forests (<b>d</b>). The meanings of the colors, lines, and areas are the same as those in <a href="#remotesensing-14-03803-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>WTC condensation spectrum results of SPEI and NDVI of grasslands (<b>a</b>), shrubs (<b>b</b>), broad-leaved forests (<b>c</b>), and coniferous forests (<b>d</b>). The meanings of the colors, lines, and areas are the same as those in <a href="#remotesensing-14-03803-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>NDVI change trends of three forestlands in eastern Inner Mongolia. The gray highlights the period of excessive logging in the Daxinganling Mountains in the 1990s, and the blue highlights the construction period of the first stage of the natural forest protection project.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>SPEI change trends of three forestlands in eastern Inner Mongolia. The meanings of the gray and blue backgrounds are the same as those in <a href="#remotesensing-14-03803-f015" class="html-fig">Figure 15</a>. The black dotted line is the threshold for drought occurrence.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3507 KiB  
Article
Study on Spatiotemporal Variation Pattern of Vegetation Coverage on Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and the Analysis of Its Climate Driving Factors
by Xiaoyu Deng, Liangxu Wu, Chengjin He and Huaiyong Shao
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8836; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148836 - 21 Jul 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 2675
Abstract
As one of the most sensitive areas to global environmental change, especially global climate change, the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau is an ideal area for studying global climate change and ecosystems. There are few studies on the analysis of the vegetation’s driving factors on the [...] Read more.
As one of the most sensitive areas to global environmental change, especially global climate change, the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau is an ideal area for studying global climate change and ecosystems. There are few studies on the analysis of the vegetation’s driving factors on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau based on large-scale and high-resolution data due to the incompetence of satellite sensors. In order to study the long-term vegetation spatiotemporal pattern and its driving factors, this study used the enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (ESTARFM) to improve the spatial resolution of the GIMMS NDVI3g (8 km) data of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in 1990 and 1995 based on the MODIS NDVI (500 m) data. The research on the spatiotemporal pattern and driving factors of vegetation on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau from 1990 to 2015 was carried out afterward, with combined data including topographic factors, annual average temperature, and annual precipitation. The results showed that there was a strong correlation between the actual MODIS NDVI image and the fused GIMMS NDVI3g image, which means that the accuracy of the fused GIMMS NDVI3g image is reliable and can provide basic data for the accurate evaluation of the spatial and temporal patterns of vegetation on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. From 1990 to 2015, the overall vegetation coverage of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau showed a degrading trend at a rate of −0.41%, and the degradation trend of vegetation coverage was the weakest when the slope was ≥25°. Due to the influence of the policy of returning farmland to forests, the overall degradation trend has gradually weakened. The significant changes in vegetation in 2010 can be attributed to the difference in the spatial distribution of climatic factors such as temperature and precipitation. The area with reduced vegetation in the west was larger than the area with increased vegetation in the east. The effects of temperature and precipitation on the distribution, direction, and degradation level of vegetation coverage were varied by the areal differentiation in different zones. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic explanation of the enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (ESTARFM) for fusing GIMMS NDVI3g and MODIS NDVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scatter plot of pixel values corresponding to the fused GIMMS NDVI3g and MODIS NDVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Detail comparison of fused GIMMS NDVI3g and real MODIS NDVI data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The vegetation change trend and Hurst index on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, (<b>a</b>) is the vegetation change trend from 1990 to 1995, (<b>b</b>) is the vegetation change trend from 2000 to 2015, (<b>c</b>) is the vegetation change trend from 1990 to 2015, (<b>d</b>) is the Hurst index from 1990 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The coefficient of partial correlation between vegetation coverage and climate factors, (<b>a</b>) is the coefficient of partial correlation between vegetation coverage and average annual temperature, and (<b>b</b>) is the coefficient of partial correlation between vegetation coverage and annual precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The change curves of vegetation coverage, average annual temperature, and annual precipitation in VIIIAi (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), VIIICi (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), VIIBib (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), VIIBi (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>). The change curves of vegetation coverage, average annual temperature, and annual precipitation are, respectively, blue, red, and black.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop