<p>Variation in fungal communities at the phylum level in the two groups. (<b>A</b>) Exposure group; (<b>B</b>) control group; and (<b>C</b>) species analysis of phylum level differences between the two groups (*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ** 0.001 < <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01, and * 0.01 < <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05).</p> Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Variation in fungal communities at the genus level in the two groups. (<b>A</b>) Exposure group; (<b>B</b>) control group; and (<b>C</b>) species analysis of genus level differences between the two groups (*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001 and ** 0.001 < <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01).</p> Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Alpha diversity and (<b>B</b>) principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of fungal communities in the two groups (*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001).</p> Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Guild assignment of two groups with OTU data using FUNGuild software. (<b>A</b>) Trophic modes for the exposure group; (<b>B</b>) trophic modes for the control group; (<b>C</b>) guild for the exposure group; and (<b>D</b>) guild for the control group.</p> Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Venn diagrams comparing the number of oral fungal OTUs in two groups. (<b>A</b>) Saprotroph; (<b>B</b>) pathotroph; and (<b>C</b>) pathotroph–saprotroph–symbiotroph.</p> Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Network analysis of fungal communities in two groups. (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Zi</span>-<span class="html-italic">Pi</span> plot; (<b>B</b>) co-occurrence network of fungal communities; (<b>C</b>) the number of trophic modes in the two fungal networks; and (<b>D</b>) Venn diagram of fungi at the genus level in the two fungal networks.</p> Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Stability analysis of co-occurrence networks. (<b>A</b>) Weighted; (<b>B</b>) unweighted; and (<b>C</b>) robustness (*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001).</p> Full article ">