[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Multigenerational Consequences of Prenatal Exposure to Benzophenone-3 Demonstrate Sex- and Region-Dependent Neurotoxic and Pro-Apoptotic Effects in Mouse Brain
Previous Article in Journal
Ecotoxicity of a Representative Urban Mixture of Rare Earth Elements to Hydra vulgaris
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integration of Copper Toxicity Mechanisms in Raphidocelis subcapitata: Advancing Insights at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations

by
Manuela D. Machado
1,2,3 and
Eduardo V. Soares
1,2,3,*
1
Bioengineering Laboratory, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr António Bernardino de Almeida, 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
2
CEB—Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
3
LABBELS—Associate Laboratory, 4800-122 Braga, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2024, 12(12), 905; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120905
Submission received: 19 November 2024 / Revised: 10 December 2024 / Accepted: 11 December 2024 / Published: 13 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Ecotoxicology)
Figure 1
<p>Effect of Cu on <span class="html-italic">R. subcapitata</span> proliferation capacity. Evolution of algal population on OECD medium in the absence (control) or the presence of Cu. Data are presented as mean values ± SD (error bars). At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p> ">
Figure 2
<p>Impact of Cu on <span class="html-italic">R. subcapitata</span> chlorophyll <span class="html-italic">a</span> content. Data are presented as mean values ± SD; mean values with different letters are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5, Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test).</p> ">
Figure 3
<p>Influence of Cu on <span class="html-italic">R. subcapitata</span> photosynthetic activity evaluated by pulse-amplitude-modulation fluorescence assay. (<b>A</b>) Maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (<span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>v</sub>/<span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>m</sub>). (<b>B</b>) Effective photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>). (<b>C</b>) Electron transport rate (<span class="html-italic">ETR</span>). (<b>D</b>) Non-photochemical quenching (<span class="html-italic">NPQ</span>). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5).</p> ">
Figure 4
<p>ROS accumulation and antioxidant activity of <span class="html-italic">R. subcapitata</span> cells exposed to Cu. (<b>A</b>) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. (<b>B</b>) Visualization of the intracellular accumulation of ROS (green cells) by epifluorescence microscopy and using the H<sub>2</sub>DCFDA probe on algae not exposed or exposed to Cu for 72 h. (<b>C</b>) Carotenoids content. (<b>D</b>) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. (<b>E</b>) Catalase (CAT) activity. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4).</p> ">
Figure 5
<p>Lipid peroxidation and loss of cell membrane integrity of <span class="html-italic">R. subcapitata</span> exposed to Cu. (<b>A</b>) Malondialdehyde (MDA) content (lipid peroxidation). (<b>B</b>) Loss of plasma membrane integrity. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3 for lipid peroxidation and <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5 for cell membrane integrity).</p> ">
Figure 6
<p>Proposal of the mechanism of action (toxicity pathway) of Cu, at environmentally relevant concentrations on the freshwater alga <span class="html-italic">R. subcapitata</span> based on the results here presented and previous works [<a href="#B13-toxics-12-00905" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B23-toxics-12-00905" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B27-toxics-12-00905" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Variations in cellular responses are symbolized by “+” or “−“ for an increase or decrease, respectively. CAT—catalase, GSH—reduced glutathione, ROS—reactive oxygen species.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work aimed to characterize the impact of copper (Cu), at environmentally relevant concentrations, using the freshwater microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata. Algae were incubated with 33 or 53 µg/L Cu, in OECD medium, and toxic impacts were evaluated over 72 h, using different cellular and biochemical biomarkers. The exposure to 33 µg/L Cu had an algistatic effect: slowing growth and reducing algal population (53%, at 72 h) without compromising the cell membrane. This Cu concentration promoted a transient reduction in chlorophyll a (chla) content and typical markers of oxidative stress: increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), augmented catalase (CAT) activity, and lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA). Algae exposed to 53 µg/L Cu, suffered a severe effect with a 93% reduction in the number of cells, 50% decrease in chla content, and diminished (17%) maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm). This population also presented increased levels of ROS and MDA, 33 and 20 times higher than the control, respectively, at 72 h, augmented CAT activity, and permeabilized cell membrane (5%, at 72 h). These findings provide valuable insights into Cu toxicity in aquatic ecosystems, highlighting the biochemical and physiological impacts at environmentally relevant concentrations.

1. Introduction

Copper (Cu) is an important environmental pollutant, being released into the environment either due to natural sources (e.g., windblown dusts, decaying vegetation, or forest fires) or anthropogenic activities. Sources of Cu in aquatic environments include copper mining leachate, industrial effluents (such as electroplating), Cu-based pesticides, algaecides, marine paints, and domestic sewage treatment plants [1]. Therefore, Cu concentrations in ground waters vary from 0.2 to 98 µg/L [2]. In surface waters, a range from 50 to 610 µg/L has been described [3]. Higher Cu concentrations were observed in surface waters in places near abandoned mines or that receive water drainage from mining operations; in these cases, Cu concentration can reach 69 mg/L [1].
The negative impact of Cu on the aquatic environment is documented, as well as its tendency to accumulate throughout the food chain [4,5], presenting potential hazards to humans [1,6]. Microalgae, as producers (trophic level 1), are a primary target of the toxic action of Cu. In this regard, the action of Cu on growth inhibition and reduction in photosynthetic activity of marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum [7], and green microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [8], Chloromonas augustae [9], Dunaliella salina [10], Scenedesmus sp. [11], Raphidocelis subcapitata [12,13,14], and Selenastrum gracile [15] has been described. Cu triggered the loss of membrane integrity in P. tricornutum [16], Chlorella sorokiniana [17], Scenedesmus acuminatus [17], and R. subcapitata [13], and oxidative stress biomarkers in C. reinhardtii [8,18,19,20,21], Chorella vulgaris [22], C. augustae [9], R. subcapitata [22,23], and Scenedesmus sp. [24]. Cu also induces the inhibition of esterase activity and damage of mitochondrial function in R. subcapitata in a dose-dependent manner [13,25,26,27] as well as induces changes in the expression levels of transcripts that encode for enzymes associated with several metabolic pathways (such as photosynthesis and glycolysis) and oxidative stress response in C. reinhardtii [28,29] and in the amino acid profile and proteome in Chlorella sp. [30].
The present work aims to evaluate the impact of Cu, at sub-lethal and environmentally relevant concentrations, on the physiology of the freshwater unicellular microalga R. subcapitata (formerly known as Selenastrum capricornutum and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), a well-known model organism, widely used in toxicity assessment [31] but poorly exploited in the elucidation of the mechanisms of action of toxicants, namely Cu. For this purpose, a kinetic and holistic approach was used, which combined different cellular and biochemical biomarkers of toxicity, such as photosynthetic pigments content, photosynthesis activity, cell membrane integrity, and oxidative stress indicators: level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), membrane lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzymes (catalase and superoxide dismutase). As the result of the integration of the knowledge obtained from the different endpoints evaluated, a mechanism of action (toxicity pathway) of Cu, at environmentally relevant concentrations, on the freshwater alga R. subcapitata was proposed.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Alga and Cultural Conditions

The unicellular alga Raphidocelis subcapitata was sourced from the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), Dunbeg, UK. The alga was cultivated in the OECD medium [32]. For strain maintenance, algal cells were grown in OECD medium with 2% (w/v) of agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and stored at 4 °C. Cultures were obtained by the inoculation of 5 × 104 cells/mL in 400 mL of OECD medium, followed by incubation at 25 °C, with shaking (100 rpm), for 48 h under continuous “cool white” fluorescent light (fluorescent lamps with a color temperature of 4300 K) with an intensity of 54 µmol photons/m2/s at the surface of the flasks.
Algae concentration was measured using an automatic cell counter (TC10, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.2. Exposure of Alga to Copper and Sampling Process

For evaluating the effects of Cu in R. subcapitata, algae were exposed to Cu concentrations that fulfill the following criteria: (i) low enough to correspond to levels found in the aquatic environment (environmental relevance) and (ii) have a major impact on cell growth. After an initial study, the nominal concentrations of 33 and 53 µg/L Cu were selected. Therefore, appropriated volumes of a standard solution (Merck, in water) of 2000 mg/L Cu(NO3)2 were added to algal cells, in the exponential phase of growth, at 1 × 105 cells/mL, in the OECD medium, at pH 7.5, contained in 1L-glass Erlenmeyer flasks (total volume: 400 mL). The cultures were later incubated under the conditions described above. Control cultures (i.e., without Cu extra addition, beyond that present in the OECD medium) were also prepared.
Free Cu concentrations, present in the culture medium, were calculated using the MINEQL+ software (version 4.5) [33]. Simulation studies were carried out at pH 7.5, wherein total Cu and ligands concentrations were considered as well as the affinity constants between Cu and the different ligands and the respective solubility product constants, obtained from Martell and Smith [34]. Thus, free Cu concentrations were estimated to be 1.4 × 10−8 in control cultures (i.e., without Cu extra addition) and 2.3 and 5.1 µg/L in cultures where nominal concentrations of 33 and 53 µg/L Cu were, respectively, added.
After 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation, samples were harvested, and the algal population was measured as described above. Then, in the remaining part of the samples, the cells were centrifuged at 2500× g and resuspended in 100 mmol/L phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), at pH 7.0, to determine ROS production and lipid peroxidation. Alternatively, cells were resuspended in OECD medium for the quantification of cell viability, photosynthetic pigments content, and evaluation of photosynthetic activity. To determine the activity of antioxidant enzymes, the cells were resuspended in a lysis buffer whose composition is described in the section “Antioxidant enzymes activity determination”.

2.3. Determination of Photosynthetic Pigments

For the quantification of the photosynthetic pigments, 5 mL of algal suspension (3 × 106 cells/mL) was centrifuged at 2500× g for 10 min. After the removal of the supernatant, algae cells were resuspended in 5 mL of 90% (v/v) acetone (VWR Chemicals, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) and the extraction of pigments occurred at 4 °C, for 20 h. Then, cells were harvested by centrifugation, at 2500× g, for 10 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 630, 647, 664, and 750 nm for chlorophyll a (chla) determination, and 480 nm for carotenoids quantification, as described by Ritchie [35] and Strickland and Parsons [36], respectively. For each time and experiment, pigments concentration was determined in triplicate.

2.4. Assessment of Photosynthetic Activity

The photosynthetic activity of photosystem II (PSII) was evaluated using a pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) chlorophyll fluorometer (Junior PAM, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). Cells (3 × 106/mL to ensure a dense cell layer at the bottom of the tube, providing accurate and reliable measurements) were, firstly, dark-adapted for 30 min. Then, the minimum (F0) and the maximum fluorescence (Fm) yield were measured, thus enabling the calculation of the maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm). To assess the efficiency of light energy utilization, a continuous actinic light (190 µmol photons/m2/s) with saturating pulses every 20 s for 5 min was applied to algal cells to obtain minimum and maximum fluorescence (F0 and Fm, respectively). These parameters allowed the calculation of the proportion of light absorbed by chlorophyll associated with PSII that is used in photochemistry (ΦPSII), the rate of electron transport through PSII (ETR), and the absorbed light energy dissipated as heat from PSII, non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) [37]. All parameters were evaluated in each time and experiment, and were calculated using the WinControl software (version 3.2.2).

2.5. Quantification of ROS Production

ROS production was monitored with 2′,7′–dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Algal cells (1 × 106/mL) were incubated, in the dark, with H2DCFDA in a final concentration of 10 µmol/L for 90 min, as previously described [23]. In each time and experiment, fluorescence intensity was measured in quintuplicate, as relative fluorescence units (RFUs), in a microplate reader (Victor3, Perkin-Elmer, Cridersville, OH, USA) at a fluorescence excitation wavelength of 485/14 nm and an emission of 535/25 nm. Fluorescence was corrected by subtracting the autofluorescence of cells, PBS buffer, and fluorescent dye.

2.6. Antioxidant Enzymes Activity Determination

To gain a deeper understanding of the effect of Cu on the antioxidant defense system of R. subcapitata, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) enzymes were determined. At times indicated in the figures, cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000× g, for 5 min, at 4 °C) and resuspended (at 1–2 × 107/mL) in an iced lysis buffer with the following composition: 100 mmol/L PBS, pH 7.0, with 1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 0.5 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Cell suspension (0.5 mL) was placed in a 2 mL microtube containing 0.3 g of glass beads (425–600 µm of diameter) and lysed in a bead-beating grinder (FastPrep-24TM 5G, MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA), using 10 cycles of 8.5 m/s for 45 s, with 2 min intervals between each cycle for cooling the samples on ice. The lysates were centrifuged (3220× g, for 15 min, 4 °C), and the supernatants were used for enzyme determination.
SOD activity was quantified by the xanthine-oxidase-cytochrome c method, described by McCord and Fridovic [38]. The reaction mixture contained 1.4 mL of 50 mmol/L PBS, pH 7.8, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.01 mmol/L cytochrome c (cyt c) and 0.05 mmol/L xanthine was combined with 0.05 mL of cell extract and 0.05 mL of 0.005 U of xanthine oxidase. As a control, an uninhibited reaction (without cell extract) was used to obtain the highest rate of reduction in cyt c. The reaction was initiated by the addition of xanthine-oxidase and the increase in absorbance at 550 nm was followed for 5 min. One unit of SOD activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that gives 50% inhibition of the control rate of cyt c reduction. At each time and experiment, SOD activity was determined in triplicate and was expressed as Units (U) per 106 cells.
CAT activity was determined following the procedure described by Aebi [39]. The decline in absorbance at 240 nm is correlated with the breakdown of H2O2 by catalase. The diminishing of H2O2 was monitored for 5 min in a 3.00 mL reaction mixture consisting of 1.25 mL of 50 mmol/L PBS, pH 7.0, with 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 1.00 mL of 30 mmol/L H2O2 (in 50 mmol/L PBS, pH 7.0), and 0.75 mL of cell extract. One unit of CAT activity is defined as the amount of enzyme which decomposes 1 μmol of H2O2 per min, under the test conditions. The reaction starts with the addition of H2O2. At each time and experiment, CAT activity was determined in triplicate and was expressed as Units (U) per 106 cells, calculated using the molar extinction coefficient of 43.6 L/mol/cm.

2.7. Quantification of Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation in algal cells was quantified using a thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay [40], as described by Buege and Aust [41]. Briefly, 0.5 mL of algal suspension (1 × 108 cells/mL) was mixed with 1.0 mL of TCA-TBA-HCl reagent [15% (m/v) of trichloroacetic acid (TCA); 0.375% (m/v) of thiobarbituric acid (TBA); 0.25 mmol/L HCl]. The mixture was placed in a bath at 95 °C, for 45 min. Then, the mixture was cooled at room temperature and centrifuged (2500× g, for 15 min) to remove interferences. The absorbance of the supernatant was read at 532 nm and TBARS were expressed as malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalents. MDA concentration was calculated using the extinction coefficient 156 L/mM/cm [41] and expressed as nmol MDA/106 cells. At each time and experiment, MDA content was evaluated in triplicate.

2.8. Evaluation of Cell Membrane Integrity

Cell membrane integrity was evaluated using the fluorescent probe SYTOX green (SG). The probe (SG) penetrates cells with a permeabilized plasma membrane but is excluded from cells with an intact membrane. Algae (at 1 × 106 cells/mL) were stained with 0.5 µmol/L SG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 20 min, at 25 °C, in the dark [42]. At least four samples of 100 cells (n ≥ 400 cells) were counted in randomly selected microscope fields for each experiment and time. Cells were observed using an epifluorescence microscope equipped with a light-emitting diode (LED) illumination system (pE-400, CoolLED, Andover, UK) and a filter set GFP from Leica.

2.9. Reproducibility of the Results and Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated, independently, under identical conditions, three to six times. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test multiple comparison method or unpaired t test, as described in the legend of the figures; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Cu on Alga Proliferation Capacity

R. subcapitata was exposed to low and environmentally relevant concentrations of Cu: 33 and 53 µg/L. For comparative purposes, cells were grown in OECD medium without an extra addition of Cu (control). In control cultures, algae grew exponentially during 48 h, with a specific growth rate (µ) of 0.061/h, which corresponded to a doubling time (generation time), td, of 11.4 h. A growth slowdown occurred between 48 and 72 h (Figure 1).
Cu deeply impacted the alga growth, even at a minute concentration. The exposure to 33 and 53 µg/L Cu resulted in a decrease in the number of cells after 72 h of 53 and 93%, respectively, compared to the control (Figure 1).
The evaluation of algal concentration over time allowed for the verification that 33 µg/L Cu severely reduced algal growth during the first 24 h (Figure 1). After this time, R. subcapitata probably acclimatized to the presence of Cu and began to grow, although at a low rate (µ = 0.044/h) compared to the control; the td in the presence of 33 µg/L Cu was 15.8 h. Algae incubated with 53 µg/L presented a reduced growth rate (µ = 0.012/h), which corresponded to a td of 57.8 h, that is, five times higher than the control.

3.2. Impact of Cu on Chlorophyll a Content and Photosynthetic Activity

To further characterize the toxic impact of Cu on R. subcapitata physiology, its effect on photosynthesis was evaluated. The analysis of chla content revealed a strong reduction (an average of 71%) over time in algae exposed to 53 µg/L Cu (Figure 2). The incubation with 33 µg/L Cu for 24 h induced a decrease of >70% of chla in algal cells. However, as observed with cell growth, subsequent incubation (48–72 h) provoked a recovery of chla content. After incubation with 33 µg/L Cu for 72 h, the algae exhibited a chla content similar to the control at 48 h (Figure 2). In control cultures, chla content reached the maximum values during exponential growth, declining after that (Figure 2).
The characterization of photosynthetic activity by PAM fluorometry showed that the maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of PSII was significantly affected in cells exposed to 53 µg/L Cu; the reduction began to be observed at 24 h and continued until 72 h (Figure 3A). The exposure to 33 µg/L Cu did not significantly impact the maximum photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) of algal cells over the exposure time (72 h) (Figure 3A). Control cultures in the exponential phase of growth displayed a mean value Fv/Fm of 0.64 (Figure 3A), which is in the range of the values (0.62–0.64) usually reported in R. subcapitata [43,44]. Cu, within the concentrations and exposure time evaluated, did not significantly affect other photosynthetic parameters such as the effective quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) (Figure 3B), photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) (Figure 3C), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (Figure 3D).

3.3. ROS Production and Antioxidant Activity

Intracellular accumulation of ROS in algal cells due to the toxic action of Cu was assessed using the redox sensor H2DCFDA. After exposure for 24 h to 33 or 53 µg/L Cu, the algae exhibited intracellular ROS levels significantly higher than the control (Figure 4A,B). In the case of incubation with 53 µg/L Cu, ROS levels increased over time and were particularly high (33 times higher than the control) at 72 h (Figure 4A).
Carotenoids (CAR) present a dual function in algal cells: as accessory pigments and as protecting the photosynthetic reaction centres through ROS scavenging [45]. To evaluate the importance of CAR in the fight against ROS, their Cu-induced levels were quantified. Incubation of R. subcapitata with 53 µg/L Cu induced a significant reduction in CAR at 24 h (Figure 4C).
To gain further insight into the impact of Cu on antioxidant defenses of R. subcapitata, the activity of the two main enzymatic defenses (SOD and CAT) was quantified. The assessment of the activity of these enzymes revealed two different patterns. SOD level was only significantly affected by the exposure to 53 µg/L Cu after 48 h (Figure 4D). CAT levels, for both Cu concentrations, increased significantly over the exposure time (Figure 4E), being particularly high at 24 h. Together, these results evidence a disturbance of the homeostatic mechanisms of the alga.

3.4. Lipid Peroxidation and Cell Membrane Integrity

High levels of intracellular ROS can lead to the oxidative degradation of the lipids (typically polyunsaturated fatty acids, PUFAs) present in cell membranes in a process called lipid peroxidation [46]. To evaluate the level of lipid peroxidation in algal cells induced by exposure to Cu, the levels of MDA (the major end-product of lipid oxidation) were quantified. The incubation of R. subcapitata with 33 or 53 µg/L Cu, for 24 h significantly increased MDA levels. Lipid peroxidation increased markedly (20 times higher than basal levels found in the control) in cells incubated with 53 µg/L Cu for 72 h (Figure 5A).
One of the possible impacts of uncontrolled oxidative stress is the injury of cell structures (containing PUFAs), namely plasma membrane, mitochondria, or chloroplasts, due to lipid damage [47]. To better portray the impact of oxidative stress induced by Cu on R. subcapitata, the cell membrane integrity of the alga was evaluated. As shown in Figure 5B, the plasma membrane integrity of algae exposed to 33 µg/L Cu was not significantly affected. Conversely, the algal population incubated with 53 µg/L Cu showed a significant increase over time in the number of cells with a compromised plasma membrane (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

Cu is one of the most toxic heavy metals to algae [48]. In the present study, the freshwater microalga R. subcapitata was exposed to 33 and 53 µg/L Cu. These Cu concentrations are environmentally relevant since they can be found in surface waters [3]. Even at the low concentrations tested, Cu had a deep impact on algae growth, reducing the number of cells at 72 h by 53 and 93%, respectively. This means that these two copper concentrations correspond to a moderate (33 µg/L) and a high (53 µg/L) toxic impact, assessed through the effect on growth, a universally accepted endpoint to evaluate the toxicity of chemical species [32]. These results prompted us to investigate, in more depth, Cu toxicity on algae. With this aim, Cu’s toxic impacts on sub-cellular processes were evaluated, since these effects remain partially unknown in this freshwater alga.
The evaluation of chlorophyll concentration over time allowed us to observe that cells incubated with 33 µg/L Cu showed a sudden decline of chla content, followed by its recovery. This variation in chlorophyll content fits perfectly into the concept of stress. In response to a stressor, homeostasis is disrupted, initiating an “alarm” signal that leads to a “response” (change in cell metabolism) to restore homeostasis through acclimation [49]. On the contrary, R. subcapitata cells exposed to more intense stress (53 µg/L Cu) showed a significant reduction in chla content, without recovery over the 72 h period. The decrease in chla was observed in different algae exposed to Cu: C. reinhardtii [50], P. tricornutum [51], R. subcapitata [52], and Scenedesmus sp. [11]. Probably, the reduction in chlorophyll content is a common symptom of heavy metal toxicity in plants and algae as a consequence of the inhibition of their biosynthesis or the induction of their degradation [53].
It is known that chla, the main photosynthetic pigment of algae, has a fundamental importance in the photosynthetic process, namely in the absorption of light (in the antenna complex) and in the transfer of energy from the absorbed photons to the reaction centre where they are used for photochemistry [54]. Hence, the reduction in the chla content may have resulted in the deterioration of photosynthetic complexes, which may explain the (observed) decrease in the Fv/Fm of PSII, a coefficient generally linked to the maximum photosynthetic capacity of cells; a decrease in this parameter indicates photoinhibition and reduction in the number of functional PSII centres [37]. This relationship was observed in cells exposed to 53 µg/L Cu; in such conditions, a strong reduction in chla content and a significant decrease (comparatively to the control) of Fv/Fm was observed. However, it is important to underline that Cu, at the range of concentrations used, did not have a significant impact on ΦPSII, a parameter that reflects the proportion of light absorbed by the chlorophylls of the PSII antenna that is used photochemically to produce energy [37]. Similarly, in the marine diatom Nitzschia closterium, photosynthesis was unaffected at Cu levels up to 153 µg/L [55].
Cu can induce HO· formation via the Haber–Weiss/Fenton reaction in the presence of H2O2 [56]. Here, we observed that R. subcapitata exposed to 33 µg/L or 53 µg/L Cu presented increased intracellular levels of ROS, which elevated hugely over time in the presence of 53 µg/L Cu. In the same way, ROS overproduction has been observed in algae exposed to Cu, usually at higher concentrations. Examples of these microalgae are C. reinhardtii [18,19,20], P. subcapitata [22], and P. tricornutum [16].
ROS can be generated at different sub-cellular levels, namely in peroxisomes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts [57]. In the case of chloroplasts, ROS can be produced in PSII, when the delivery of energy from the excited chlorophylls to the PSII reaction centre exceeds the electron transport capacity between the photosystems due to electron flow limitations at the level of the transport chain; the leaked electrons react with oxygen leading to ROS formation [54]. In R. subcapitata exposed to up 53 µg/L Cu, this possibility of ROS formation seems to be ruled out, since the ETR values (an indicator of the rate at which electrons are transferred from PSII to PSI) [58] are not significantly different from the control. Thus, although the involvement of chloroplasts in Cu-stressed cells in ROS production cannot be excluded, the photosynthetic electron transport chain (between the two photosystems) does not seem to be the primary source of ROS. Mitochondria can be a plausible candidate. Consistent with this possibility, the modification of mitochondrial membrane potential [13] has been described in R. subcapitata exposed to 80 µg/L Cu for 72 h, which was accompanied by an increase in intracellular ROS production [23].
Membrane PUFAs are possible targets of peroxidation by intracellular ROS [59]. Consistent with this possibility, it was observed that algae exposed to 33 or 53 µg/L Cu showed increased levels of ROS and MDA, a biomarker of lipid peroxidation [59]. For the Cu concentrations tested, MDA content seems to be correlated (R2 = 0.76–0.84) with ROS overproduction (Figure S1). Likewise, lipid peroxidation has been described in Scenedesmus sp. exposed to 159 or 636 µg/L Cu for 6 h or 7 days [24].
On the other hand, lipid peroxidation can result in the loss of membrane integrity [59]. In fact, in cells exposed to 53 µg/L Cu, the loss of plasma membrane integrity appears to be correlated (R2 = 0.79) with the level of lipid peroxidation (Figure S2). For this concentration, Cu had a slight algicidal effect (~5%, at 72 h). Overproduction of ROS accompanied by the loss of cell membrane integrity was also observed in P. tricornutum, when exposed to ≥2.5 mg/L Cu for 48–96 h [51]. In addition, the algicidal effect (death of algae due to the loss of membrane integrity) in Cu-exposed cells of Chlamydomonas moewusii (≥10 mg/L, 24 h) and C. vulgaris (≥30 mg/L, 3–24 h) has been described [60]. However, the loss of cell membrane integrity was not observed in algae exposed to a lower concentration of Cu. Cells incubated with 33 µg/L Cu presented intracellular levels of ROS and MDA significantly higher than the control, without loss of cell membrane integrity. Probably, lipids other than those from the plasma membrane, such as those present in chloroplast membranes, rich in PUFAs [57], were potential peroxidation targets. The exposure to oxidative stress, being Cu-induced, lead to an increase in CAT activity to deplete intracellular oxidants and thus, counteract the increase in ROS levels and protect the algal cells. In recent years, the altered expression of genes encoding ROS-scavenging enzymes, such as SOD and CAT, has been described. Thus, the Cu-treated freshwater alga Closterium ehrenbergii showed an increased expression of CuZnSOD genes [61]. Transcriptional analysis in the alga D. salina, exposed to Cd, revealed an altered expression of SOD genes [62], while the alga Auxenochlorella protothecoides, exposed to ultra-high Cd stress, presented upregulated expression of the MnSOD gene and downregulated the expression of FeSOD and CAT genes [63].
Combining the information here presented with those previously obtained [13,23,27], a proposal of the mechanism of action (toxicity pathway) of Cu on R. subcapitata was built, in which the chain of impacts that occur in algal cells is presented (Figure 6). Thus, the combination of several effects such as a decrease in metabolic activity and mitochondrial function [13,23], accompanied by a reduction in chla content and photosynthetic performance and the alteration of enzymatic (CAT) and non-enzymatic defenses, such as reduced glutathione [23] due to the oxidative stress (increase in intracellular ROS accumulation), could explain the inhibition of alga induced by Cu (Figure 6). On the other hand, the increase in the intracellular level of ROS leads to lipid peroxidation and loss of membrane integrity, with the consequent death of the alga cells at higher concentrations of Cu (Figure 6).

5. Conclusions

R. subcapitata exposed to Cu at environmentally relevant concentrations for up to 72 h presented several toxicity markers depending on metal concentration and exposure time. Thus, algae incubated with 33 µg/L Cu grew more slowly without the loss of cell membrane integrity. A transient decrease in chla, and an increase in ROS and MDA levels were detected in these algae. On the other hand, algae incubated with 53 µg/L Cu showed a greater reduction in growth (93%) and a decrease in chla content and the maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII. Algae exposed to 53 µg/L Cu also exhibited augmented levels of intracellular ROS, lipid peroxidation, and cells with a compromised plasma membrane.
The elucidation of the mode of action of Cu, at environmentally relevant concentrations, in the alga R. subcapitata could be useful in defining strategies to mitigate the toxic effects of Cu, namely through the development of better regulatory guidelines to avoid its release into the environment, thus contributing to the protection of aquatic ecosystems and human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics12120905/s1, Figure S1: Correlation between intracellular ROS accumulation and MDA content in R. subcapitata; Figure S2: Correlation between MDA content and % of cells with permeabilized plasma membrane in R. subcapitata exposed to 53 µg/L Cu.

Author Contributions

M.D.M.: validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—visualization; E.V.S.: conceptualization, validation, visualization, and writing—original draft preparation, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UIDB/04469/2020 unit (DOI 10.54499/UIDB/04469/2020), and by LABBELS—Associate Laboratory in Biotechnology, Bioengineering and Microelectrochemical Systems, LA/P/0029/2020. Manuela D. Machado acknowledges FCT for the research contract funding through program DL 57/2016- Norma Transitória.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Declarations

Compliance with ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.

References

  1. ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Copper (Draft for Public Comment); Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold, T.; Bexfield, L.M.; Musgrove, M.; Erickson, M.L.; Kingsbury, J.A.; Degnan, J.R.; Tesoriero, A.J.; Kulongoski, J.T.; Belitz, K. Groundwater-Quality and Select Quality-Control Data from the National Water-Quality Assessment Project, January Through December 2016, and Previously Unpublished Data from 2013 to 2015; U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1124; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston VA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ogamba, E.N.; Charles, E.E.; Izah, S.C. Distributions, pollution evaluation and health risk of selected heavy metal in surface water of Taylor creek, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2021, 13, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gao, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Ding, X.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhu, L. Trophic transfer of heavy metals in the marine food web based on tissue residuals. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 772, 145064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. VandKhanghah, M.M.; Hedayati, A.; Nazeri, S.; Mohammadi Azarm, H.; Ghorbani, R. Biomagnification of copper along the aquatic food chain (Artemia franciscana, Danio rerio, and Astronotus ocellatus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 1854–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Arnal, N.; Astiz, M.; de Alaniz, M.J.T.; Marra, C.A. Clinical parameters and biomarkers of oxidative stress in agricultural workers who applied copper-based pesticides. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 1779–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cid, A.; Herrero, C.; Torres, E.; Abalde, J. Copper toxicity on the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum: Effects on photosynthesis and related parameters. Aquat. Toxicol. 1995, 31, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Lei, A.; Wang, J. Towards elucidation of the toxic mechanism of copper on the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Ecotoxicology 2016, 25, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yong, W.-K.; Sim, K.-S.; Poong, S.-W.; Wei, D.; Phang, S.-M.; Lim, P.-E. Interactive effects of warming and copper toxicity on a tropical freshwater green microalga Chloromonas augustae (Chlorophyceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Akimov, A.I.; Solomonova, E.S.; Shoman, N.Y.; Rylkova, A.O. Changes in the growth rate and fluorescent and cytometric parameters of the microalga Dunaliella salina (Teod.) at different Cu2+ concentrations in the cultivation medium. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2023, 16, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tripathi, B.N.; Gaur, J.P. Physiological behavior of Scenedesmus sp. during exposure to elevated levels of Cu and Zn and after withdrawal of metal stress. Protoplasma 2006, 229, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Modification of cell volume and proliferative capacity of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata cells exposed to metal stress. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 147, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Machado, M.D.; Lopes, A.R.; Soares, E.V. Responses of the alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to long-term exposure to metal stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 296, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Silva, V.; Marques, C.R.; Campos, I.; Vidal, T.; Keizer, J.J.; Gonçalves, F.; Abrantes, N. Combined effect of copper sulfate and water temperature on key freshwater trophic levels—Approaching potential climatic change scenarios. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rocha, G.S.; Parrish, C.C.; Espíndola, E.L.G. Effects of copper on photosynthetic and physiological parameters of a freshwater microalga (Chlorophyceae). Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cid, A.; Fidalgo, P.; Herrero, C.; Abalde, J. Toxic action of copper on the membrane system of a marine diatom measured by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1996, 25, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hamed, S.M.; Selim, S.; Klöck, G.; AbdElgawad, H. Sensitivity of two green microalgae to copper stress: Growth, oxidative and antioxidants analyses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Szivák, I.; Behra, R.; Sigg, L. Metal-induced reactive oxygen species production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 2019, 45, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jamers, A.; Blust, R.; De Coen, W.; Griffin, J.L.; Jones, O.A.H. Copper toxicity in the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: An integrated approach. BioMetals 2013, 26, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stoiber, T.L.; Shafer, M.M.; Armstrong, D.E. Induction of reactive oxygen species in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in response to contrasting trace metal exposures. Environ. Toxicol. 2013, 28, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nowicka, B.; Zyzik, M.; Kapsiak, M.; Ogrodzińska, W.; Kruk, J. Oxidative stress limits growth of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyta, Chlamydomonadales) exposed to copper ions at the early stage of culture growth. Phycologia 2021, 60, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Knauert, S.; Knauer, K. The role of reactive oxygen species in copper toxicity to two freshwater green algae. J. Phycol. 2008, 44, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Short- and long-term exposure to heavy metals induced oxidative stress response in Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Clean Soil Air Water 2016, 44, 1578–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tripathi, B.N.; Mehta, S.K.; Amar, A.; Gaur, J.P. Oxidative stress in Scenedesmus sp. during short- and long-term exposure to Cu2+ and Zn2+. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Franklin, N.M.; Adams, M.S.; Stauber, J.L.; Lim, R.P. Development of an improved rapid enzyme inhibition bioassay with marine and freshwater microalgae using flow cytometry. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2001, 40, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Franklin, N.M.; Stauber, J.L.; Lim, R.P. Development of flow cytometry-based algal bioassays for assessing toxicity of copper in natural waters. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2001, 20, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Use of a fluorescence-based approach to assess short-term responses of the alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to metal stress. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jamers, A.; Van der Ven, K.; Moens, L.; Robbens, J.; Potters, G.; Guisez, Y.; Blust, R.; De Coen, W. Effect of copper exposure on gene expression profiles in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii based on microarray analysis. Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 80, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nowicka, B.; Pluciński, B.; Kuczyńska, P.; Kruk, J. Physiological characterization of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii acclimated to chronic stress induced by Ag, Cd, Cr, Cu and Hg ions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 130, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shakya, M.; Silvester, E.; Rees, G.; Rajapaksha, K.H.; Faou, P.; Holland, A. Changes to the amino acid profile and proteome of the tropical freshwater microalga Chlorella sp. in response to copper stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 233, 113336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Features of the microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata: Physiology and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. OECD. Test No. 201: Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schecher, W.D.; McAvoy, D.C. MINEQL+: A Chemical Equilibrium Modeling System, Version 4.5 for Windows, User’s Manual; Environmental Research Software: Hallowell, ME, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Martell, A.E.; Smith, R.M. NIST Standard Reference Database Vol. 46, Version 8. NIST Critically Selected Stability Constants of Metal Complexes Database; US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ritchie, R.J. Universal chlorophyll equations for estimating chlorophylls a, b, c, and d and total chlorophylls in natural assemblages of photosynthetic organisms using acetone, methanol, or ethanol solvents. Photosynthetica 2008, 46, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Strickland, J.; Parsons, T.R. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis, 2nd ed.; Fisheries Research Board: Ottawa, OT, Canada, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  37. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McCord, J.M.; Fridovic, I. Superoxide dismutase. An. enzymatic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244, 6049–6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gutteridge, J.M.C.; Halliwell, B. The measurement and mechanism of lipid peroxidation in biological systems. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1990, 15, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Buege, J.A.; Aust, S.D. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. In Biomembranes—Part C: Biological Oxidations; Fleischer, S., Packer, L., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 302–310. [Google Scholar]
  42. Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Development of a short-term assay based on the evaluation of the plasma membrane integrity of the alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Van der Grinten, E.; Pikkemaat, M.G.; van den Brandhof, E.-J.; Stroomberg, G.J.; Kraak, M.H.S. Comparing the sensitivity of algal, cyanobacterial and bacterial bioassays to different groups of antibiotics. Chemosphere 2010, 80, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Life and death of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata: Physiological changes during chronological aging. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 8245–8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hashimoto, H.; Uragami, C.; Cogdell, R.J. Carotenoids and photosynthesis. In Carotenoids in Nature: Biosynthesis, Regulation and Function; Stange, C., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 111–139. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yin, H.; Xu, L.; Porter, N.A. Free radical lipid peroxidation: Mechanisms and analysis. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5944–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moldovan, L.; Moldovan, N.I. Oxygen free radicals and redox biology of organelles. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 122, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nowicka, B. Heavy metal–induced stress in eukaryotic algae—Mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity and tolerance with particular emphasis on oxidative stress in exposed cells and the role of antioxidant response. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 16860–16911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Borowitzka, M.A. The ‘stress’ concept in microalgal biology—Homeostasis, acclimation and adaptation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 2815–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stoiber, T.L.; Shafer, M.M.; Perkins, D.A.K.; Hemming, J.D.C.; Armstrong, D.E. Analysis of glutathione endpoints for measuring copper stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, Y.; Zhu, N.; Lavoie, M.; Wang, J.; Qian, H.; Fu, Z. Copper toxicity to Phaeodactylum tricornutum: A survey of the sensitivity of various toxicity endpoints at the physiological, biochemical, molecular and structural levels. BioMetals 2014, 27, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Calomeni, A.; Rodgers, J.H.; Kinley, C.M. Responses of Planktothrix agardhii and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to copper sulfate (CuSO4.5H2O) and a chelated copper compound (Cutrine®-Ultra). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Joshi, M.K.; Mohanty, P. Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a probe of heavy metal ion toxicity in plants. In Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration; Papageorgiou, G.C., Govindjee, Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 19, pp. 637–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schiphorst, C.; Bassi, R. Chlorophyll-xanthophyll antenna complexes: In between light harvesting and energy dissipation. In Photosynthesis in Algae: Biochemical and Physiological Mechanisms, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration; Larkum, A.W.D., Grossman, A.R., Raven, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 45, Chapter 3; pp. 27–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stauber, J.L.; Florence, T.M. Mechanism of toxicity of ionic copper and copper complexes to algae. Mar. Biol. 1987, 94, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kehrer, J.P. The Haber–Weiss reaction and mechanisms of toxicity. Toxicology 2000, 149, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rezayian, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Oxidative damage and antioxidative system in algae. Toxicol. Rep. 2019, 6, 1309–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Guarini, J.-M.; Moritz, C. Modelling the dynamics of the electron transport rate measured by PAM fluorimetry during rapid light curve experiments. Photosynthetica 2009, 47, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Valavanidis, A.; Vlahogianni, T.; Dassenakis, M.; Scoullos, M. Molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress in aquatic organisms in relation to toxic environmental pollutants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2006, 64, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Prado, R.; García, R.; Rioboo, C.; Herrero, C.; Cid, Á. Suitability of cytotoxicity endpoints and test microalgal species to disclose the toxic effect of common aquatic pollutants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, H.; Ki, J.-S. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of copper-zinc superoxide dismutases from the freshwater alga Closterium ehrenbergii under metal stress. Environ. Toxicol. 2020, 35, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhu, Q.; Guo, S.; Wen, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Si, L. Transcriptional and physiological responses of Dunaliella salina to cadmium reveals time-dependent turnover of ribosome, photosystem, and ROS-scavenging pathways. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 207, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lu, J.J.; Ma, Y.L.; Xing, G.L.; Li, W.L.; Kong, X.X.; Li, J.Y.; Wang, L.J.; Yuan, H.L.; Yang, J.S. Revelation of microalgae’s lipid production and resistance mechanism to ultra-high Cd stress by integrated transcriptome and physiochemical analyses. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of Cu on R. subcapitata proliferation capacity. Evolution of algal population on OECD medium in the absence (control) or the presence of Cu. Data are presented as mean values ± SD (error bars). At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05, n = 6).
Figure 1. Effect of Cu on R. subcapitata proliferation capacity. Evolution of algal population on OECD medium in the absence (control) or the presence of Cu. Data are presented as mean values ± SD (error bars). At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05, n = 6).
Toxics 12 00905 g001
Figure 2. Impact of Cu on R. subcapitata chlorophyll a content. Data are presented as mean values ± SD; mean values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, n = 5, Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test).
Figure 2. Impact of Cu on R. subcapitata chlorophyll a content. Data are presented as mean values ± SD; mean values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, n = 5, Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test).
Toxics 12 00905 g002
Figure 3. Influence of Cu on R. subcapitata photosynthetic activity evaluated by pulse-amplitude-modulation fluorescence assay. (A) Maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm). (B) Effective photochemical quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII). (C) Electron transport rate (ETR). (D) Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05, n = 5).
Figure 3. Influence of Cu on R. subcapitata photosynthetic activity evaluated by pulse-amplitude-modulation fluorescence assay. (A) Maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm). (B) Effective photochemical quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII). (C) Electron transport rate (ETR). (D) Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05, n = 5).
Toxics 12 00905 g003
Figure 4. ROS accumulation and antioxidant activity of R. subcapitata cells exposed to Cu. (A) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. (B) Visualization of the intracellular accumulation of ROS (green cells) by epifluorescence microscopy and using the H2DCFDA probe on algae not exposed or exposed to Cu for 72 h. (C) Carotenoids content. (D) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. (E) Catalase (CAT) activity. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05; n = 4).
Figure 4. ROS accumulation and antioxidant activity of R. subcapitata cells exposed to Cu. (A) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. (B) Visualization of the intracellular accumulation of ROS (green cells) by epifluorescence microscopy and using the H2DCFDA probe on algae not exposed or exposed to Cu for 72 h. (C) Carotenoids content. (D) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. (E) Catalase (CAT) activity. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05; n = 4).
Toxics 12 00905 g004
Figure 5. Lipid peroxidation and loss of cell membrane integrity of R. subcapitata exposed to Cu. (A) Malondialdehyde (MDA) content (lipid peroxidation). (B) Loss of plasma membrane integrity. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05; n = 3 for lipid peroxidation and n = 5 for cell membrane integrity).
Figure 5. Lipid peroxidation and loss of cell membrane integrity of R. subcapitata exposed to Cu. (A) Malondialdehyde (MDA) content (lipid peroxidation). (B) Loss of plasma membrane integrity. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. At each time, the statistical difference between control and Cu-treated cells was tested using unpaired Student’s t-test; the means with (*) are significantly different from the control (p < 0.05; n = 3 for lipid peroxidation and n = 5 for cell membrane integrity).
Toxics 12 00905 g005
Figure 6. Proposal of the mechanism of action (toxicity pathway) of Cu, at environmentally relevant concentrations on the freshwater alga R. subcapitata based on the results here presented and previous works [13,23,27]. Variations in cellular responses are symbolized by “+” or “−“ for an increase or decrease, respectively. CAT—catalase, GSH—reduced glutathione, ROS—reactive oxygen species.
Figure 6. Proposal of the mechanism of action (toxicity pathway) of Cu, at environmentally relevant concentrations on the freshwater alga R. subcapitata based on the results here presented and previous works [13,23,27]. Variations in cellular responses are symbolized by “+” or “−“ for an increase or decrease, respectively. CAT—catalase, GSH—reduced glutathione, ROS—reactive oxygen species.
Toxics 12 00905 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Machado, M.D.; Soares, E.V. Integration of Copper Toxicity Mechanisms in Raphidocelis subcapitata: Advancing Insights at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations. Toxics 2024, 12, 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120905

AMA Style

Machado MD, Soares EV. Integration of Copper Toxicity Mechanisms in Raphidocelis subcapitata: Advancing Insights at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations. Toxics. 2024; 12(12):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Machado, Manuela D., and Eduardo V. Soares. 2024. "Integration of Copper Toxicity Mechanisms in Raphidocelis subcapitata: Advancing Insights at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations" Toxics 12, no. 12: 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120905

APA Style

Machado, M. D., & Soares, E. V. (2024). Integration of Copper Toxicity Mechanisms in Raphidocelis subcapitata: Advancing Insights at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations. Toxics, 12(12), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop