[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Soy Protein Isolate Improved the Properties of Fish Oil-Loaded Chitosan–Sodium Tripolyphosphate Capsules
Previous Article in Journal
Cold Plasma as a Novel Pretreatment to Improve the Drying Kinetics and Quality of Green Peas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enzyme Engineering: Performance Optimization, Novel Sources, and Applications in the Food Industry
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Physico-Chemical Analysis of Dextran from Maltodextrin via pH Controlled Fermentation by Gluconobacter oxydans

1
Fermentation Research Department, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA, Jeonju 54875, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Food Science & Biotechnology and Carbohydrate Bioproduct Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2025, 14(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14010085
Submission received: 14 November 2024 / Revised: 24 December 2024 / Accepted: 27 December 2024 / Published: 1 January 2025

Abstract

:
Dextran is an exopolysaccharide (EPS) with multifunctional applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries, primarily synthesized from Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Dextran can be produced from dextrin through Gluconobacter oxydans fermentation, utilizing its dextran dextrinase activity. This study examined how jar fermentor conditions impact the growth and enzyme activity of G. oxydans, with a focus on the effects of pH on dextran synthesis via bioconversion (without pH control, pH 4.5, and pH 5.0; Jp-UC, Jp-4.5, and Jp-5.0). After 72 h, the cell density (O.D. at 600 nm) was 7.2 for Jp-4.5, 6.5 for Jp-5.0, and 3.7 for Jp-UC. Flow property analysis, indicating dextran production, showed that Jp-4.5 had the highest viscosity (30.99 mPa·s). 1H-NMR analysis confirmed the formation of α-1,6 glycosidic bonds in bioconversion products, with bond ratios ranging from ~1:0.17 to ~1:2.84. The distribution of molecular weights varied from 1.3 × 103 Da to 5.1 × 104 Da depending on pH. The hydrolysis rates to glucose differed with pH, with the slowest rate at pH 4.5 (53.96%). These results suggest that the production of dextran by G. oxydans is significantly influenced by the pH conditions. This dextran could function as a slowly digestible carbohydrate, aiding in postprandial glycemic regulation and mitigating chronic metabolic diseases like diabetes.

1. Introduction

Microorganisms produce exopolysaccharides (EPS) to adapt to their environment [1,2]. In general, pathogenic microorganisms use EPS to form biofilms to attach extracellular cells and protect against environmental factors [3,4,5]. Acetic acid bacteria (AAB), such as Gluconobacter oxydans, can produce β-glucan structures like bacterial cellulose (BC) or α-glucan structures like dextran under specific conditions [6,7]. BC is a water-insoluble polymer composed of β-1,4 glucan chains, which differentiate it from dextran, a water-soluble polymer primarily composed of α-1,6 glucosidic linkages with variable amounts of α-1,4-, α-1,3-, and α-1,2 linkages [6,8,9,10]. The production of these biopolymers depends on culture conditions such as pH, medium composition, and enzymatic activity.
Dextran is homopolymers of D-glucopyranosyl residues that mainly synthesized from sucrose by Leuconostoc spp. via transglucosylation by dextransucrases (DSases; E.C. 2.4.1.5) that produce dextran containing a high percentage of consecutive α-1,6 linkages and a low percentage of α-1,3 linkages [11,12]. In 1949, Hehre and Hamilton [13] showed that polysaccharides from Acetobacter capsulatum (i.e., Gluconobacter oxydans) could produce ropy beer, similar to polysaccharides from Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Additionally, Hehre [14] and Yamamoto et al. [15] reported that dextran dextrinase (DDase; E.C. 2.4.1.2), derived from G. oxydans, could convert dextran from maltodextrin (MD) in contrast to DSase. The structure of dextran synthesized by G. oxydans DDase harbored α-1,4 branches and α-1,4 linkages in α-1,6 glucosyl linear chains [16,17]. In particular, DDase has an advantage over DSase in the dextran production process because DDase does not produce monosaccharide by-products such as fructose [18,19].
Dextran is a biopolymer isolated from microorganisms that use dextran to form parts of their viscous extracellular matrix [20]. It is industrially useful polymers that do not exist in nature and have demonstrated multifunctional applications in the biochemical (e.g., molecular sieves for chromatography) and pharmaceutical (e.g., blood plasma substitute) industries [9,18]. Moreover, these microbial polysaccharides can exert distinct functions depending on their molecular weight (MW), the targeted saccharide substrate, the position of linkages, and the presence or absence of branched bonds [21]. Given their unique structural characteristics, dextrans from Gluconobacter spp. have been used in the food industry as sources of dietary fiber, cryostabilizers, fat substitutes, and low-calorie bulking agents for sweeteners [20]. Furthermore, dextrans have been applied broadly in other industries including as components for cosmetics [22], dietary fiber due to its low digestibility by intestinal enzymes [17], in high-viscosity gums, and as food additives [23].
Numerous studies have reported the production and characteristics of dextran derived from the heterogeneous expression of G. oxydans DDase [12,15,16,24,25]. However, the use of this enzyme as a food ingredient requires approval from government food agencies. Additionally, the production of biomaterials via the fermentation of AAB demonstrating enzyme activity might be affected by various factors including medium composition, substrate concentration, and culture temperature. Furthermore, previous studies have reported on the increased productivity of G. oxydans in bioreactors due to their lower biomass [26,27]. Nevertheless, there is a knowledge gap associated with the establishment of the optimal culture conditions for efficient dextran production, especially with regard to the optimal pH employed during semi-continuous fermenter operations.
Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the rheological characteristics of the culture media and physiochemical characteristics of G. oxydans dextran synthesized in dextrin media at different pH values. These results provide fundamental information that can be applied to generate functional carbohydrates as food raw materials via the bioconversion process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Strains and Preparation of Stock Cultures

G. oxydans KACC 19,357 (ATCC 11894) was obtained from the Korean Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC, Suwon, Korea). The bacteria were grown at 30 °C in acetic acid bacterium (AAB) medium containing 5 g bactopeptone, 5 g yeast extract, 5 g D-glucose, and 1 g MgSO4∙7H2O per liter at a pH range of 6.6 to 7.0. The organisms were initially cultured on AAB agar medium at 30 °C for 72 h and then inoculated into liquid medium at 30 °C for 24 h. At the end of the incubation time, stock cultures were prepared by dispensing 1 mL of the inoculum into sterile 2 mL cryovials containing 0.5 mL glycerol. The resulting suspensions were mixed and stored at −70 °C.

2.2. Cultivation of the Jar Fermenter

Dextran production by G. oxydans was conducted in a 5.0-L jar fermenter (Kobiotech, Incheon, Korea). Jar fermenter cultures were performed as follows. The strain was precultivated for 20 h to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5 in a 250-mL flask containing 60 mL AAB medium at 30 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. The media from the seed culture were then transferred to media in the 2.5-L jar fermenter media, the composition of which has been previously described [28,29,30]. The culture conditions including dextrin composition, injection time, and shaking speed were established and slightly modified in several preliminary experiments [31]. The final culture medium comprised 1.2 L of media comprising 6 g yeast extract, 0.6 g KH2PO4, 0.6 g K2HPO4, 6 g D-glucose, 1.2 g MgSO4∙7H2O, 60 g MD [dextrose-equivalent; Serimfood, Buchoen, Korea), and 2% (v/v) glycerol. Additionally, we manually added substrate solution (60 g MD, 2 g MgSO4∙7H2O, and 100 mL distilled water) at 50-mL increments at 12 h and 24 h of culture. The pH of the culture was controlled by the automated addition of 10% (v/v) NaOH and 50% (v/v) glycerol solution. Foam content was automatically controlled by the addition of 0.05% (v/v) antifoam solution (Antifoam 204; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). A pH of 4.5 is considered optimal for DDase activity, and a pH of 5.0 is considered optimal for cell-mass proliferation and DDase stability following isolation from acetic acid bacteria [15,32]. According to previous results showing that pH affects the growth of G. oxydans [33], we compared the culture characteristics of G. oxydans under different pH values by employing three cultures with different pH status (Jp-UC, jar fermentor pH uncontrolled; Jp-4.5, pH controlled to 4.5; and Jp-5.0, pH controlled to 5.0) (Table 1). The OD600 of the cultures was determined using a 1 mL cuvette in a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 3500 UV–Vis; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples were appropriately diluted in order to maintain the OD600 value between 0.2 and 0.8.

2.3. Analysis of Rheological Properties

We performed rheological measurements using a modified method from Im et al. [34] to describe the flow behaviors of the culture medium while using 10% and 20% dextran solution (dextran 40; Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) as positive controls. The flow sweep test was conducted using a rheometer (Discovery HR-1; TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) interfaced with TRIOS software (V5.6, TA Instruments). All experiments were performed using Peltier plate geometry (diameter: 40 mm) at 25 °C. The viscosity was measured as a function of shear rate in the range of 0.1 s−1 to 300 s−1, with apparent viscosity expressed at a shear rate of 100 s−1.

2.4. Dextran Isolation

The fermented media were centrifuged in 7119× g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove the cells, after which dextran was precipitated from the culture supernatant following the addition of nine volumes of ice-cold absolute ethanol and centrifuged after incubation at −80 °C for 2 h. The precipitate was freeze-dried, with the powder form used for analysis (Figure S1).

2.5. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) Analysis

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was used to analyze the molecular weight distribution of the polysaccharides produced as described before [35]. The culture solution was treated with 90% (v/v) cold ethanol to precipitate the polysaccharides, which were then recovered and freeze-dried. The sample (10 mg/mL) was dissolved in distilled water, filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (13 mm, 0.22 μm, NYLON, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Rockwood, TN, USA), and used for analysis. An HPLC system (Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a TSK gel G3000PW column (7.8 mm × 30 cm, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) was used for separation. The column was maintained at 40 °C with a sample injection volume of 10 μL and distilled water as the solvent. Molecular weight was determined by elution time, using the glucose, maltose, and pullulan standards from Sigma-Aldrich as reference substances.

2.6. NMR Analysis

The ratio of α-1,4 and α-1,6 glycosidic bonds in high molecular weight polysaccharides produced under different culture conditions was analyzed using 1H-NMR spectroscopy (500 MHz FT-NMR, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Polysaccharides were recovered by ethanol precipitation from the culture supernatant, and the freeze-dried sample (20 mg/mL) was dissolved in deuterium oxide (D2O). The solution was incubated at 45 °C for 20 min before performing the 1H-NMR analysis [36]. The parameters were as follows: spectrometer frequency = 500.16 MHz; spectral width = 9384.4 Hz; acquisition time = 3.5 s; relaxation delay = 20 s; number of scans = 16; 90° pulse width = 7.6 μs; pulse angle = 45°; digital resolution = 0.29 Hz.

2.7. Hydrolysis Properties of Dextran by Mammalian Mucosal α-Glucosidase

To investigate the digestibility characteristics of the dextran, the glucose content released by the action of the digestive enzyme RIAP (rat intestinal acetone powder), a mammalian α-glucosidase, was measured using a modified method from Um et al. [37]. A freeze-dried polymer sample, recovered by ethanol precipitation from the culture medium, was dissolved at a concentration of 0.1% (w/v) in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 6.7 mM NaCl and 0.2% sodium azide. This solution was then incubated with RIAP (10 mg/mL, w/v) at 37 °C. Ampicillin (0.0005%, w/v) was added to prevent microbial growth during the reaction. Substrate–enzyme mixtures were collected at intervals of 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h, with enzyme activity terminated by heating to 95 °C for 5 min, followed by centrifugation at 7119× g for 5 min. The glucose released by enzymatic hydrolysis was quantified using the D-Glucose Assay Kit (Megazyme Co., Bray, Wicklow, Ireland) with maltodextrin and dextran included as controls for comparative analysis.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for each experiment. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (v27.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) along with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range tests. The results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Growth Properties of G. oxydans

The growth characteristics of the three different pH condition culture groups of G. oxydans are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. The Jp-UC group, in the absence of NaOH-solution feeding, the pH rapidly decreased to 4.0 after 6 h and to 3.0 after 12 h of growth, eventually stabilizing at pH 2.5 for the remainder of the 72-h incubation period. G. oxydans oxidizes and metabolizes glycerol into acidic substances in medium [38], resulting in acidification of the medium and subsequent hampering of growth at pH levels <3.5 by completely inhibiting the activities of enzymes in the pentose phosphate pathway [20]. The optimal pH for G. oxydans growth lies between 4.0 and 5.0, which promotes the oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate and shifts the culture medium to lower pH values [39]. After adjusting the medium pH with NaOH, the Jp-4.5 and Jp-5.0 groups maintained stable pH values of 4.5 and 5.0, respectively. These conditions supported increased growth, reflected in OD600 values of 7.2 and 6.5 for Jp-4.5 and Jp-5.0, respectively. This resulted in a 1.8- to 1.9-fold increase in cell mass compared to the Jp-UC group, which had an OD600 of 3.7. This was in agreement with a previous study that reported that G. oxydans showed optimal growth at a pH range of 4.0 to 6.0 [32,40].
Additionally, we observed initial decreases in the dissolved oxygen (DO) content from 6 to 12 h, followed by gradual increases to a plateau after 24 h across all experimental groups. In each case, the cells exhibited an exponential growth phase between 6 and 24 h, likely due to enhanced growth facilitated by the utilization of available oxygen. Moreover, the observed patterns of decreased DO (Jp-4.5 > Jp-5.0 > Jp-UC) and increased growth (Jp-4.5 > Jp-5.0 > Jp-UC) confirmed the expected correlation between DO and growth rate in these obligate aerobic bacteria. Dextran biosynthesis would be possible in cultures grown in maltodextrin-containing media due to the DDase activity of G. Oxydans [15]. Given that the enzyme is pH-sensitive, a distinct pattern in dextran production may emerge, potentially leading to differences in the characteristics or composition of the resulting bioconversion products. Yamamoto et al. [15] reported that the optimal and stable pH of DDase ranges from 4.0 to 4.5 and 3.2 to 5.0, respectively.

3.2. Physicochemical Properties of Dextran Produced in G. oxydans Culture Media

3.2.1. Flow Behavior

The apparent viscosity values presented in Table 2 revealed distinct differences among the culture media. Jp-4.5 exhibited the highest viscosity (30.99 mPa·s), even surpassing that of a 20% dextran solution (16.17 mPa·s), suggesting significant polymer formation. The Jp-UC medium showed an intermediate viscosity (15.2 mPa·s), comparable to a 10% dextran solution, while Jp-5.0 had a considerably lower viscosity (2.39 mPa·s) that was comparable to the initial medium, implying limited polymer synthesis at pH 5.0.
On the other hand, Figure 2 shows the rheological properties of Gluconobacter oxydans culture media under different pH conditions, where the Jp-4.5 medium demonstrated non-Newtonian, shear-thinning behavior, with high shear stress at low shear rates that gradually decreased as the shear rates increased, while the Jp-5.0 and Jp-Uc media exhibited Newtonian fluid behavior. Zarour et al. [41] reported that dextran solutions from five lactic acid bacteria (LAB) sources displayed viscosity behaviors dependent on the concentration and shear rate, with low concentrations maintaining Newtonian, shear rate-independent viscosity similar to certain commercial dextrans, while higher concentrations showed a viscosity decrease with increasing shear rate, indicating non-Newtonian, pseudoplastic behavior. Similarly, Xu et al. [42] found that a high molecular weight dextran solution (5.223 × 105) at 30 wt% also displayed pseudoplastic properties, likely due to hydrodynamic forces disrupting structural entanglements among the α-glucan chains in solution under shear [42]. These suggest that the Jp-4.5 medium likely contains a higher dextran concentration than the Jp-5 and JU media, which may account for its distinctive shear-thinning behavior.
These findings partially align with those of Yamamoto et al. [15] and Sadahiro [43], who reported DDase stability between pH 3.2 and 5.5 and optimal G. oxydans growth at pH 5.5. However, under the controlled pH conditions of the jar fermentor used here, pH 5.0 did not support effective dextran synthesis, as reflected in the low viscosity in Jp-5.0. While pH adjustments between 4.5 and 5.0 enhanced G. oxydans growth by reducing medium oxidation, our results demonstrate that a narrower pH range, closer to 4.5, is required for optimal dextran production. Thus, pH 4.5 appears to balance both growth and dextran biosynthesis, underscoring the importance of precise pH control to maximize the dextran yield.

3.2.2. Molecular Weight Distribution

Figure 3 and Table 3 show the molecular weight (MW) distribution of dextran synthesized through G. oxydans culture, as analyzed by GPC. In Figure 3A, the decrease in substrate (consumption pattern) and the formation of products as well as their size distribution over time are presented. At 0 h (initial medium), the peak eluting at 15–18 min corresponded to the maltodextrin component added as a substrate, with a peak molecular weight (Mp) of 1284 Da, indicating it as a maltooligosaccharide with a degree of polymerization (DP) of 7–8, composed primarily of glucose. It could be observed that the distribution of molecular weights extended to components above 22 kDa. This peak rapidly decreased over the course of 6 and 12 h, suggesting that as the G. oxydans culture progressed, lower molecular weight substances were consumed, indicating an efficient utilization of carbon sources and sugar-transferring substrates. At 12 h, the peak at 16 min was significantly lower, indicating that maltodextrin, which had been depleted at the appropriate time, was likely injected as a feeding solution. At 12 h, the supernatant of the culture showed significant differences in peak patterns from the initial medium. As the culture progressed, the peak at 12–14 min corresponding to a 50 kDa molecular weight increased, suggesting effective dextran and polysaccharide production. The molecular weight distribution patterns at 48 and 72 h were similar, with the peaks for low-molecular-weight substances slightly shifting to the left compared to the initial medium, indicating the use of maltodextrin chains as acceptors and the transfer of glucose molecules, leading to an increase in the molecular weight of the products.
In Figure 3B, dextran from the culture supernatants at 72 h under different pH conditions were recovered by ethanol precipitation and compared by preparing 1% (w/v) aqueous solutions of the dried dextran. The Mp of the Jp-UC sample was significantly smaller than those of Jp-4.5 and Jp-5.0, which were 44,267 Da and 50,722 Da, respectively. This result was consistent with the lower peak observed between 12 and 14 min in the chromatogram. Notably, G. oxydans cultured at pH 5.0 showed a decrease in glucose levels without a significant increase in either maltooligosaccharide synthesis or high-molecular-weight substance production (Figure 3B). In evaluating the DDase activity based on substrate specificity, Yamamoto et al. [15] reported that 30.2% and 57.6% of dextran was synthesized from maltohexaose and short-chain amylose, respectively. Additionally, other studies have indicated that dextran synthesized by DDase exhibits a broad molecular weight distribution, ranging from 6.6 kDa to 96.8 kDa [9,24]. A recent study [44] reported conversion into isomalto-megalosaccharides, which differ slightly from dextran, with similar-sized products appearing between 6 kDa and 1.3 kDa in the chromatogram (Figure 3B). Similarly, the polysaccharide composition and yield biotransformed by G. oxydans, recovered from media cultured under varying pH conditions, exhibited diverse compositions.

3.2.3. 1H-NMR Analysis

Figure 4 shows the 1H-NMR spectrum of the dextran isolated from G. oxydans culture media, confirming the formation of dextran from dextrin through chemical shifts at 5.3 ppm and 4.9 ppm, which corresponded to the formation of an α-(1→4) and an α-(1→6) linkage (glycosidic bonds in the polymer), respectively [45]. Consistent with our results, Cheetham et al. [46] also observed the anomeric proton resonance for the α-(1→6) D-glycosyl residue at approximately 4.94 ppm in their studies on Dextran T10 and B-512. In our analysis of polysaccharides from each experimental group (Jp-UC, Jp-4.5, and Jp-5.0), the presence of an α-(1→6) linkage was confirmed by a specific peak absent in MD alone (Figure 4). Among the groups, the estimated linkage ratio [α-(1→4) to α-(1→6)] in the polysaccharides from Jp-4.5 was 1:2.84; which was 1.5- and 16-fold higher than that in Jp-UC (1:1.84) and Jp-5.0 (1:0.17), as shown in Table 4. These findings indicate that the DDase activity was affected by the culture pH, with the maximum dextran synthesis observed at pH 4.5 but not at pH 5.0, suggesting that glycosyltransfer activity might be hindered at pH 5.

3.3. Digestibility of Dextran by Mammalian α-Glucosidases

To evaluate the digestibility of synthesized dextran into glucose via bioconversion by mammalian α-glucosidase under different pH conditions, the reaction with digestive enzymes derived from rat small intestine tissue was measured for 24 h (Figure 5). α-Glucosidase is an enzyme that breaks down polysaccharides and disaccharides into monosaccharides in the small intestine; its activity and pattern of action are known to vary depending on the evolutionary level of the organism [37,47]. The small intestinal mucosa contains a complex of enzymes, maltase-glucoamylase (MGAM) (EC 3.2.1.20 and 3.2.1.3) and sucrose-isomaltase (SI) (EC 3.2.148 and 3.2.10), which have different actions to digest carbohydrates and hydrolyze them to free glucose [48]. Mammalian digestive enzymes derived from rat intestine were used for these measurements instead of AMG, a microbial enzyme commonly utilized in digestion studies, because they closely mimic digestion in the human body [49].
We found that 84.8% of the maltodextrin used as a substrate was hydrolyzed to glucose within the first hour of digestion compared to 49.6% and 59.1% for Jp-UC and Jp-5.0, respectively, and only 32.8% for Jp-4.5. Over a total of 24 h, Jp-UC released 82.3% of glucose, showing a similar level of hydrolysis to that of maltodextrin (90.6%). In contrast, Jp-4.5 exhibited a total glucose release of only 54.0%, indicating a clear pattern of slow glucose decomposition and highlighting significant differences in dextran digestibility depending on the pH conditions during culture. This finding aligns with the glycosidic linkage ratios shown in Figure 4; maintaining the pH at 4.5 during G. oxydans fermentation led to active dextrin-to-dextran converting enzyme (DDase) activity, transforming the substrate into dextran, an α-1,6 glucan. Meanwhile, commercial dextran derived from sucrose, used as a positive control for the digestion reaction, showed an initial glucose release of 5.7%, increasing to 33.6% by the end of the 24 h reaction.
Maltodextrin, an α-1,4 glucan, is hydrolyzed by amylase in the body to produce maltose units. These maltose units are either directly absorbed by the intestinal epithelium or further broken down by maltase to release glucose, resulting in a rapid rise in blood glucose levels [50,51]. However, studies have shown that α-1,6 bonds are hydrolyzed more slowly than α-1,4 bonds, which reduces in vitro digestibility [48]. Thus, increasing the number of α-1,6 bonds while decreasing α-1,4 bonds is significantly associated with improved slow digestibility, and recent research has focused on increasing the proportion of α-1,6 bonds [47,52]. This reduction in the rate of initial glucose breakdown is crucial as it helps prevent blood glucose spikes, thereby suppressing insulin secretion and potentially lowering the metabolic load on organs involved in digestion [53]. Thus, cultured solutions synthesized through the G. oxydans enzyme reaction and their product by ethanol precipitated under specific pH conditions may serve as functional ingredients to prevent blood sugar spikes and regulate postprandial glycemic response by promoting slow digestion.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that appropriate pH adjustments are critical in optimizing G. oxydans growth and dextran production, with pH 4.5 proving particularly effective compared to uncontrolled pH and pH 5.0. The highest apparent viscosity (30.99 mPa∙s) and α-1,6 linkage ratio observed at pH 4.5 indicated enhanced enzyme activity and efficient dextran synthesis. Molecular size distribution analysis confirmed that dextran molecular weights ranged from 1.3 × 103 Da to 5.1 × 104 Da, with a broader size range under the tested pH conditions. Moreover, the dextran produced under the Jp-4.5 condition exhibited the slowest glucose release, suggesting the production of α-1,6 glucan with slow-digesting characteristics. Therefore, dextran bio-converted from dextrin by G. oxydans has potential as a functional carbohydrate ingredient to help manage postprandial glycemic response.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14010085/s1, Figure S1: Schematic diagram of Dextran Production Process by Gluconobacter oxydans.

Author Contributions

S.-M.B.: Conceptualization, methodology, and formal analysis; investigation, data curation; writing—original draft. L.S.C.: Writing, methodology, review and editing, supervision Y.-S.S.: Data curation. J.-H.J.: Conceptualization, methodology. S.L.: Methodology. J.Y.P.: Visualization. B.-R.P.: Conceptualization, writing—original draft and editing, resources, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01417801), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Nicolaus, B.; Kambourova, M.; Oner, E.T. Exopolysaccharides from extremophiles: From fundamentals to biotechnology. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 1145–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sutherland, I.W. Surface Carbohydrates of the Prokaryotic Cell; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  3. Donot, F.; Fontana, A.; Baccou, J.C.; Schorr-Galindo, S. Microbial exopolysaccharides: Main examples of synthesis, excretion, genetics and extraction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 951–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Parikh, A.; Madamwar, D. Partial characterization of extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1822–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, S.; Kant, C.; Yadav, R.K.; Reddy, Y.P.; Abraham, G. Cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides: Composition, biosynthesis, and biotechnological applications. In Cyanobacteria: From Basic Science to Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 347–358. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bounaix, M.S.; Robert, H.; Gabriel, V.; Morel, S.; Remaud-Siméon, M.; Gabriel, B. Characterization of dextran-producing Weissella strains isolated from sourdoughs and evidence of constitutive dextransucrase expression. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 311, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Hugenholtz, J.; Zoon, P. An overview of the functionality of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Besrour-Aouam, N.; Fhoula, I.; Hernández-Alcántara, A.M.; Mohedano, M.L.; Najjari, A.; Prieto, A. The role of dextran production in the metabolic context of Leuconostoc and Weissella Tunisian strains. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 253, 117254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mountzouris, K.C.; Gilmour, S.G.; Jay, A.J.; Rastall, R.A. A study of dextran production from maltodextrin by cell suspensions of Gluconobacter oxydans NCIB 4943. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 87, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Robyt, J.F. Structure, biosynthesis and uses of non-starch polysaccharides: Dextran, alternan, pullulan and algin. In Developments in Carbohydrate Chemistry; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1992; pp. 261–292. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hehre, E.J. Production from sucrose of a serologically reactive polysaccharide by a sterile bacterial extract. Science 1941, 93, 237–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Naessens, M.; Cerdobbel, A.; Soetaert, W.; Vandamme, E.J. Leuconostoc dextransucrase and dextran: Production, properties and applications. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 845–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hehre, E.J.; Hamilton, D.M. Bacterial conversion of dextrin into a polysaccharide with the serological properties of dextran. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1949, 71, 336–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hehre, E.J. The biological synthesis of dextran from dextrins. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 192, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yamamoto, k.; Yoshikawa, K.; Kitahata, S.; Okada, S. Purification and some properties of dextrin dextranase from Acetobacter capsulatus ATCC 11894. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mao, X.; Wang, S.; Kan, F.; Wei, D.; Li, F. A novel dextran dextrinase from Gluconobacter oxydans DSM-2003: Purification and properties. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 168, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yamamoto, K.; Yoshikawa, K.; Okada, S. Structure of dextran synthesized by dextrin dextranase from Acetobacter capsulatus ATCC 11894. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993, 57, 1450–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Muynck, C.; Pereira, C.S.S.; Naessens, M.; Parmentier, S.; Soetaert, W.; Vandamme, E.J. The genus Gluconobacter oxydans: Comprehensive overview of biochemistry and biotechnological applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2007, 27, 147–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Naessens, M. Dextran Dextrinase from Gluconobacter oxydans: Production and Characterization. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Naessens, M.; Cerdobbel, A.; Soetaert, W.; Vandamme, E.J. Dextran dextrinase and dextran of Gluconobacter oxydans. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 32, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Son, B.S.; Park, S.K.; Lee, S.W.; Sung, C.K.; Seo, K.I. Viscosity of exopolysaccharide from Xanthomonas sp. EPS-1. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 25, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vettori, M.H.P.B.; Blanco, K.C.; Cortezi, M.; De Lima, C.J.; Contiero, J. Dextran: Effect of process parameters on production, purification and molecular weight and recent applications. Diálogos Ciênc. 2012, 31, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Scientific Committee on Food. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on a Dextran Preparation, Produced using Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Lactobacillus spp. as a Novel Food Ingredient in Bakery Products; European Commission; Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General: Brussels, Belgium, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, S.; Mao, X.; Wang, H.; Lin, J.; Li, F.; Wei, D. Characterization of a novel dextran produced by Gluconobacter oxydans DSM 2003. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yamamoto, K.; Yoshikawa, K.; Okada, S. Substrate Specificity of dextrin dextranase from Acetobacter capsulatus ATCC 11894. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gupta, A.; Singh, V.K.; Qazi, G.N.; Kumar, A. Gluconobacter oxydans: Its Biotechnological Applications. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 3, 445–456. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei, G.; Yang, X.; Gan, T.; Zhou, W.; Lin, J.; Wei, D. High cell density fermentation of Gluconobacter oxydans DSM 2003 for glycolic acid production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Habe, H.; Shimada, Y.; Yakushi, T.; Hattori, H.; Ano, Y.; Fukuoka, T.; Kitamoto, D.; Itagaki, M.; Watanabe, K.; Yanagishita, H.; et al. Microbial Production of Glyceric Acid, an Organic Acid That Can Be Mass Produced from Glycerol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7760–7766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sato, S.; Morita, N.; Kitamoto, D.; Yakushi, T.; Matsushita, K.; Habe, H. Change in product selectivity during the production of glyceric acid from glycerol by Gluconobacter atrains in the presence of methanol. AMB Express. 2013, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhong-Ce, H.; Liu, Z.Q.; Zheng, Y.G.; Shen, Y.C. Production of 1,3-Dihydroxyacetone from Glycerol by Gluconobacter oxydans ZJB09112. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 340–345. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jeong, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, J.H.; Park, S.Y.; Park, C.S.; Park, B.R. Synthesis and physicochemical properties of polysaccharides by Gluconobacter oxydans with glycosyltransferase activity. Food Sci. Preserv. 2021, 28, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Olijve, W.; Kok, J.J. An analysis of the growth of Gluconobacter oxydans in chemostat cultures. Arch. Microbiol. 1979, 121, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Silberbach, M.; Maier, B.; Zimmermann, M.; Büchs, J. Glucose oxidation by Gluconobacter oxydans: Characterization in shaking-flasks, scale-up and optimization of the pH profile. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 62, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Im, P.; Han, J.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, B.; Kim, M.Y.; Chang, Y.; Lee, Y. Effects of guar gum on quality of soft tofu stew sauce. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 44, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chewaka, L.S.; Park, C.S.; Cha, Y.S.; Desta, K.T.; Park, B.R. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Tenebrio molitor (Mealworm) Using Nuruk Extract Concentrate and an Evaluation of Its Nutritional, Functional, and Sensory Properties. Foods 2023, 12, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nishidono, Y.; Tanaka, K. Structure Elucidation of New Kavalactone Dimers From Alpinia zerumbet Pericarps Using NMR Calculations. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2024, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Um, H.E.; Park, B.R.; Kim, Y.M.; Lee, B.H. Slow digestion properties of long-sized isomaltooligosaccharides synthesized by a transglucosidase from Thermoanaerobacter thermocopriae. Food Chem. 2023, 417, 135892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Prust, C.; Hoffmeister, M.; Liesegang, H.; Wiezer, A.; Fricke, W.F.; Ehrenreich, A. Complete genome sequence of the acetic acid bacterium Gluconobacter oxydans. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Adachi, O.; Matsushita, K.; Shinagawa, E.; Ameyama, M. Crystallization and characterization of NADP-dependent D-glucose dehydrogenase from Gluconobacter suboxydans. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1980, 44, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Ley, J.; Swings, J. The genus Gluconobacter. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1984; pp. 267–278. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zarour, K.; Llamas, M.G.; Prieto, A.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Dueñas, M.T.; de Palencia, P.F.; Lopez, P. Rheology and bioactivity of high molecular weight dextrans synthesised by lactic acid bacteria. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 646–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, X. Hydrodynamic properties of aqueous dextran solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 111, 1523–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sadahiro, J.; Mori, H.; Saburi, W.; Okuyama, M.; Kimura, A. Extracellular and cell-associated forms of Gluconobacter oxydans dextran dextrinase change their localization depending on the cell growth. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 456, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lang, W.; Kumagai, Y.; Sadahiro, J.; Saburi, W.; Sarnthima, R.; Tagami, T.; Kimura, A. A practical approach to producing isomaltomegalosaccharide using dextran dextrinase from Gluconobacter oxydans ATCC 11894. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Suzuki, M.; Unno, T.; Okadal, G. Simple purification and characterization of an extracellular dextrin dextranase from Acetobacter capsulatum ATCC 11894. J. Appl. Glycosci. 1999, 46, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheetham, N.W.; Fiala-Beer, E.; Walker, G.J. Dextran structural details from high-field proton NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Polym. 1990, 14, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, B.H.; Yan, L.; Phillips, R.J.; Reuhs, B.L.; Jones, K.; Rose, D.R.; Hamaker, B.R. Enzyme-synthesized highly branched maltodextrins have slow glucose generation at the mucosal α-glucosidase level and are slowly digestible in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8, e59745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, G.; Hamaker, B.R. Slowly digestible starch: Concept, mechanism, and proposed extended glycemic index. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 852–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Seo, J.M.; Lamothe, L.M.; Shin, H.; Austin, S.; Yoo, S.H.; Lee, B.H. Determination of glucose generation rate from various types of glycemic carbohydrates by mammalian glucosidases anchored in the small intestinal tissue. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hofman, D.L.; Van Buul, V.J.; Brouns, F.J. Nutrition, health, and regulatory aspects of digestible maltodextrins. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 2091–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ludwig, D.S. The glycemic index: Physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Jama 2002, 287, 2414–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ao, Z.; Simsek, S.; Zhang, G.; Venkatachalam, M.; Reuhs, B.L.; Hamaker, B.R. Starch with a slow digestion property produced by altering its chain length, branch density, and crystalline structure. J. Agric. Food chem. 2007, 55, 4540–4547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, G.; Hamaker, B.R. Slowly digestible starch and health benefits. In Resistant Starch: Sources, Applications and Health Benefits; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 111–130, Chapter 6. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Changes in the G. oxydans growth curve (solid line), and pH (short dash line) (A); DO (B). Symbols: ●, Jp-UC; ○, Jp-4.5; and ▼, Jp-5.0.
Figure 1. Changes in the G. oxydans growth curve (solid line), and pH (short dash line) (A); DO (B). Symbols: ●, Jp-UC; ○, Jp-4.5; and ▼, Jp-5.0.
Foods 14 00085 g001
Figure 2. Effect of shear stress on G. oxydans culture media growth under various culture conditions.
Figure 2. Effect of shear stress on G. oxydans culture media growth under various culture conditions.
Foods 14 00085 g002
Figure 3. Gel permeation chromatography analysis of dextran from G. oxydans. (A) Time-dependent changes in the molecular weight distribution of Jp-4.5. (B) Molecular weight distribution of dextran produced under varying pH conditions.
Figure 3. Gel permeation chromatography analysis of dextran from G. oxydans. (A) Time-dependent changes in the molecular weight distribution of Jp-4.5. (B) Molecular weight distribution of dextran produced under varying pH conditions.
Foods 14 00085 g003
Figure 4. 1H-NMR spectrum of dextran from G. oxydans.
Figure 4. 1H-NMR spectrum of dextran from G. oxydans.
Foods 14 00085 g004
Figure 5. Glucose generation property of dextran from G. oxydans by mammalian small intestinal α-glucosidase.
Figure 5. Glucose generation property of dextran from G. oxydans by mammalian small intestinal α-glucosidase.
Foods 14 00085 g005
Table 1. Jar fermenter culture design with different pH conditions.
Table 1. Jar fermenter culture design with different pH conditions.
Sample AbbreviationCompositionCondition
* Substrate Solution (g)Media Volume (L)RPMpHTime (h)Aeration (vvm)
Jp-UC1201.2600Unadjusted720.5
Jp-4.54.5
Jp-5.05.0
* Total substrate concentration with feeding at 12 h and 24 h. Jp-UC: Jar fermentor pH uncontrolled. Jp-4.5: Jar fermentor pH 4.5. * Jp-5.0: Jar fermentor pH 5.0. RPM, revolutions per min.
Table 2. Rheological properties of the culture media.
Table 2. Rheological properties of the culture media.
SampleApparent Viscosity (mPa∙s)
Media1.67 ± 0.028 d
10% dextran solution4.25 ± 0.059 c
20% dextran solution16.17 ± 0.123 b
Jp-UC15.20 ± 0.407 b
Jp-4.530.99 ± 1.259 a
Jp-5.02.39 ± 0.349 d
Data in the same column with different letter represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Table 3. MW distributions of samples.
Table 3. MW distributions of samples.
SampleMW (1)Mp (2)DP (3)
MD563612848
Dextran41,55934,780215
Jp-UC28,66915129
Jp-4.588,28644,267273
Jp-5.046,57750,722313
(1) Mw, total weight average molecular weight (kDa); (2) Mp, molecular weight of highest peak (kDa); (3) DP, degree of polymerization, expressed by dividing the Mp value by the molecular weight of one glucose molecule (162 Da).
Table 4. Analysis of the ratio of glycosidic linkages in polysaccharides derived from G. oxydans.
Table 4. Analysis of the ratio of glycosidic linkages in polysaccharides derived from G. oxydans.
SamplesGlycosidic Linkage Ratio
α-(1→4)α-(1→6)
Jp-UC1.001.84 ± 0 b
Jp-4.51.002.84 ± 0.02 a
Jp-5.01.000.17 ± 0.01 c
Data in the same column with different superscript represent a significant difference at p < 0.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baek, S.-M.; Park, B.-R.; Chewaka, L.S.; So, Y.-S.; Jung, J.-H.; Lee, S.; Park, J.Y. Synthesis and Physico-Chemical Analysis of Dextran from Maltodextrin via pH Controlled Fermentation by Gluconobacter oxydans. Foods 2025, 14, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14010085

AMA Style

Baek S-M, Park B-R, Chewaka LS, So Y-S, Jung J-H, Lee S, Park JY. Synthesis and Physico-Chemical Analysis of Dextran from Maltodextrin via pH Controlled Fermentation by Gluconobacter oxydans. Foods. 2025; 14(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14010085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baek, Seung-Min, Bo-Ram Park, Legesse Shiferaw Chewaka, Yun-Sang So, Ji-Hye Jung, Seul Lee, and Ji Young Park. 2025. "Synthesis and Physico-Chemical Analysis of Dextran from Maltodextrin via pH Controlled Fermentation by Gluconobacter oxydans" Foods 14, no. 1: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14010085

APA Style

Baek, S. -M., Park, B. -R., Chewaka, L. S., So, Y. -S., Jung, J. -H., Lee, S., & Park, J. Y. (2025). Synthesis and Physico-Chemical Analysis of Dextran from Maltodextrin via pH Controlled Fermentation by Gluconobacter oxydans. Foods, 14(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14010085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop