Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve in Four Dogs: Preliminary Results Regarding Efficacy and Safety
<p>The thoracic radiograph on lateral and ventrodorsal view before (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and after surgery (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), and the v-clamp (white arrow) was visualized on the area between the left atrium and left ventricle. The heart enlargement was visualized on the thoracic X-ray with a vertebral heart scale (VHS) of 11.5, and the vertebral left atrium size (VLAS) of 2.9.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images from two patients before the surgical intervention (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>); jet flow (white arrow) is visible in the left atrium (LA) (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>). (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>) a V-clamp device (black arrow on (<b>E</b>)) on the mitral valve of the dog; no jet flow is visible after the procedure (<b>F</b>), and slight jet flow is visible after the procedure (<b>H</b>). (LV = left ventricle; AO = aorta).</p> "> Figure 3
<p>A V-clamp device placement (black arrow) with an introducer sheath of 14 mm was inserted into the left atrium (LA). A satisfactory clamp position was confirmed using fluoroscopy guidance. (RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle; LV = left ventricle; MV = Mitral valve).</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Echocardiography parameters before and after 3, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 days after mitral valve repair using a V-clamp device. Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).</p> ">
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Physical Examination and Laboratory Investigations
2.2. Thoracic Radiography
2.3. Echocardiography
2.4. Anesthetic and Analgesic Protocol
2.5. Surgical Intervention
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Post-Operative Clinical Data
3.2. Transthoracic Echocardiography Findings After Mitral Valve Repair
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dal-Bianco, J.P.; Beaudoin, J.; Handschumacher, M.D.; Levine, R.A. Basic mechanisms of mitral regurgitation. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Staveren, M.D.B.; Muis, E.; Szatmári, V. Self-Reported Utilization of International (ACVIM Consensus) Guidelines and the Latest Clinical Trial Results on the Treatment of Dogs with Various Stages of Myxomatous Mitral Valve Degeneration: A Survey among Veterinary Practitioners. Animals 2024, 14, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keene, B.W.; Atkins, C.E.; Bonagura, J.D.; Fox, P.R.; Häggström, J.; Fuentes, V.L.; Oyama, M.A.; Rush, J.E.; Stepien, R.; Uechi, M. ACVIM consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 1127–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uechi, M. Mitral valve repair in dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uechi, M.; Mizukoshi, T.; Mizuno, T.; Mizuno, M.; Harada, K.; Ebisawa, T.; Takeuchi, J.; Sawada, T.; Uchida, S.; Shinoda, A.; et al. Mitral valve repair under cardiopulmonary bypass in small-breed dogs: 48 cases (2006–2009). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 240, 1194–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihara, K.; Kanemoto, I.; Sato, K.; Yasuhira, Y.; Watanabe, I.; Suzuki, Y.; Nagura, J.; Misumi, K. Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. Vet. Surg. VS 2024, 53, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyman, C.B.; Mackensen, G.B.; Jelacic, S.; Little, S.H.; Smith, T.W.; Mahmood, F. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Clip. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2018, 31, 434–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, W.; Long, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pan, C.; Wei, L.; Liu, X.; Luo, J.; Chen, L.; Zhou, D.; Ge, J. Transapical Edge-to-Edge Repair System in High-Risk Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: A Multicenter Trial (CLAMP-2). JACC. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023, 16, 2340–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naveiro-Rilo, J.C.; Diez-Juárez, D.M.; Romero Blanco, A.; Rebollo-Gutiérrez, F.; Rodríguez-Martínez, A.; Rodríguez-García, M.A. Validation of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in primary care. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2010, 63, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, M.C.; Yang, Y.L.; Chen, T.T.; Lee, C.I.; Tam, K.W. Recruitment maneuvers to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022, 164, 171–181.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, W.P.; Gaber, C.E.; Jacobs, G.J.; Kaplan, P.M.; Lombard, C.W.; Moise, N.S.; Moses, B.L. Recommendations for standards in transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in the dog and cat. Echocardiography Committee of the Specialty of Cardiology, American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1993, 7, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cornell, C.C.; Kittleson, M.D.; Della Torre, P.; Häggström, J.; Lombard, C.W.; Pedersen, H.D.; Vollmar, A.; Wey, A. Allometric scaling of M-mode cardiac measurements in normal adult dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004, 18, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sasaki, K.; Ma, D.; Mandour, A.S.; Ozai, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Matsuura, K.; Takeuchi, A.; Cheng, C.J.; El-Husseiny, H.M.; Hendawy, H.; et al. Evaluation of Changes in the Cardiac Function before and after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in Healthy Dogs: Conventional and Novel Echocardiography. Animals 2021, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, W.; Pan, C.; Jilaihawi, H.; Wei, L.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Ge, J. A novel user-friendly transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair device in a porcine model. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019, 93, 1354–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Leach, S.B.; Pan, W.; Zheng, F.; Jia, L.; Zhou, X.; Li, J. Preliminary Outcome of a Novel Edge-to-Edge Closure Device to Manage Mitral Regurgitation in Dogs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 597879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, E.S.; Visser, L.C.; Sbardellati, N.; Potter, B.M.; Ohlendorf, A.; Scansen, B.A. Utility of vertebral left atrial size and vertebral heart size to aid detection of congestive heart failure in dogs with respiratory signs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2023, 37, 2021–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polderman, K.H.; Girbes, A.R. Severe electrolyte disorders following cardiac surgery: A prospective controlled observational study. Crit. Care 2004, 8, R459–R466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, T.; Kar, S.; Rinaldi, M.; Fail, P.; Hermiller, J.; Smalling, R.; Whitlow, P.L.; Gray, W.; Low, R.; Herrmann, H.C.; et al. Percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip system: Safety and midterm durability in the initial EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair Study) cohort. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitlow, P.L.; Feldman, T.; Pedersen, W.R.; Lim, D.S.; Kipperman, R.; Smalling, R.; Bajwa, T.; Herrmann, H.C.; Lasala, J.; Maddux, J.T.; et al. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: The EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 59, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, T.; Kar, S.; Elmariah, S.; Smart, S.C.; Trento, A.; Siegel, R.J.; Apruzzese, P.; Fail, P.; Rinaldi, M.J.; Smalling, R.W.; et al. Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Repair and Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: 5-Year Results of EVEREST II. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 66, 2844–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruaux, C.; Scollan, K.; Suchodolski, J.S.; Steiner, J.M.; Sisson, D.D. Biologic variability in NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin-I in healthy dogs and dogs with mitral valve degeneration. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2015, 44, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sepolvere, G.; Scialdone, V.R. Chronic pain in cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023, 89, 230–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feray, S.; Lemoine, A.; Aveline, C.; Quesnel, C. Pain management after thoracic surgery or chest trauma. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023, 89, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson-Brazill, K.A. Pain Control in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Patient. Crit. Care Nurs. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 31, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubb, T.; Lobprise, H. Local and regional anaesthesia in dogs and cats: Overview of concepts and drugs (Part 1). Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 6, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boswell, M.R.; Moman, R.N.; Burtoft, M.; Gerdes, H.; Martinez, J.; Gerberi, D.J.; Wittwer, E.; Murad, M.H.; Hooten, W.M. Lidocaine for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: A systematic review. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2021, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumann Kreuziger, L.; Karkouti, K.; Tweddell, J.; Massicotte, M.P. Antithrombotic therapy management of adult and pediatric cardiac surgery patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2018, 16, 2133–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Xie, X.; Dai, H.; Zhou, M.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, L. Long-term left atrial thrombi after mitral valve replacement. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 51, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Shaer, A.; Mahayni, A.; Simard, T.; Eleid, M.; Guerrero, M.; Rihal, C.S.; Alkhouli, M. Baseline Left Atrial Pressure Predicts Mortality Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 14, 2306–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaden, J.J.; Malouf, J.F.; Nkomo, V.T.; Pislaru, S.V.; Holmes, D.R.; Jr Reeder, G.S.; Rihal, C.S.; Eleid, M.F. Mitral Valve Anatomic Predictors of Hemodynamic Success With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, e007315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuss, M.; Schau, T.; Isotani, A.; Pilz, M.; Schöpp, M.; Butter, C. Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After MitraClip Implantation Deteriorates Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Heart Failure. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017, 10, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Happiness | ||||||||
(1) My dog wants to play. | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
(2) My dog reacts to my presence. | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
(3) My dog enjoys life. | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Happiness score | 11 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 14 |
Mental status | ||||||||
(1) My dog shakes or trembles. | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
(2) My dog seems depressed and not alert. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Mental status score | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Hygiene | ||||||||
(1) My dog keeps him/herself clean. | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
(2) My dog smells like urine or has skin irritation. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(3) My dog’s hair is greasy and rough. | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
Hygiene score | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
Physical function | ||||||||
(1) My dog rests and sleeps all day long. | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
(2) My dog lays in one place all day long. | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
(3) My dog moves normally. | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
(4) My dog is in pain. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
(5) My dog coughs and pants frequently even at rest. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
(6) My dog has swelling on the legs and ascites. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Parameter | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Reference Value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
Age | 9 years | 14 years | 9 years | 11 years | - | ||||
Gender | Female | Male | Female | Male | - | ||||
Breed | Beagle | Pomeranian | Chihuahua | Poodle | - | ||||
MMVD stage | B2 | C | C | B2 | - | ||||
Vertebral heart size (VHS) [16] | 11.2 | 11.5 | 12 | 10.5 | 11.1 | ||||
Vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) [16] | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3 | 2.1 | ||||
AP diameter (mm) | 16.34 | 22.8 | 21.7 | 12.7 | 12–24 | ||||
Type of V-clamp device | IV | IV | IV | III | II–V | ||||
WBC (×103/uL) | 5.51 | 6.67 | 6.85 | 10.18 | 7.35 | 7.6 | 15.0 | 11.2 | 6–17 |
RBC (×106/uL) | 8.85 | 8.26 | 5.77 | 5.87 | 7.71 | 5.9 | 6.13 | 8.15 | 5–9 |
HGB (gm%) | 16.8 | 18.8 | 13.6 | 13.6 | 17.6 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 14.2 | 12–18 |
PCV (%) | 57.36 | 53.8 | 38.3 | 37.9 | 50.0 | 40 | 40.9 | 50.7 | 30–55 |
Platelets (×103/uL) | 232 | 304 | 261 | 280 | 416 | 401 | 215 | 324 | 200–900 |
Segmented neutrophil (×103/uL) | 3.66 | 6.9 | 5.71 | 8.08 | 8.1 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 3–11.5 |
Lymphocyte (×103/uL) | 1.39 | 2.0 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1–4.8 |
Monocyte (×103/uL) | 0.38 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.15–1.35 |
Eosinophil (×103/uL) | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1–1.25 |
BUN (mg%) | 13 | 15.7 | 94 | 44 | 22.2 | 20 | 16.0 | 37 | <34.6 |
Creatinine (mg%) | 0.9 | 0.88 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | <1.8 |
Total Protein (gm%) | 6.5 | 7.4 | 7.8 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 9 | 7.6 | 5.3–7.8 |
ALT (U/L) | 37 | 31 | 452 | 420 | 76 | 48 | 122 | 88 | <89 |
ALP (U/L) | 109 | 91 | 1911 | 877 | 94 | 85 | 48 | 45 | <108 |
Parameter | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | After 6 Months | Before | After 5 Months | Before | After 6 Months | Before | After 5 Months | |
MMVD stage | B2 | C | C | B2 | ||||
IVSd (cm) | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.81 |
LVIDd (cm) | 4.26 | 3.18 | 3.80 | 3.46 | 3.69 | 3.33 | 2.86 | 2.12 |
LVPWd (cm) | 0.72 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.68 |
IVSs (cm) | 1.32 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.93 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
LVIDs (cm) | 2.82 | 1.83 | 2.70 | 1.81 | 1.93 | 1.64 | 1.99 | 1.35 |
LVPWs (cm) | 0.89 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.15 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
FS (%) | 33.9 | 42.5 | 34.0 | 47.8 | 47.1 | 50.73 | 30.59 | 36.36 |
LA (cm) | 2.55 | 2.25 | 3.29 | 3.20 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.15 | 1.68 |
LA/Ao ratio | 1.44 | 1.60 | 2.95 | 2.0 | 2.74 | 2.39 | 2.06 | 1.61 |
MV E/A ratio | 0.78 | 0.90 | 2.86 | 1.14 | 0.6 | 1.04 | 1.0 | 0.96 |
MV Deceleration time (ms) | 80 | 70 | 100 | 135 | 85 | 21 | 140 | 70 |
E wave velocity (m/s) | 0.62 | 0.59 | 1.61 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 1.17 | 0.93 | 1.22 |
E/IVRT ratio | 2.07 | 2.91 | 4.02 | 1.98 | 8.95 | 4.68 | 3.64 | 2.4 |
PV/PA ratio | 1.02 | 1.16 | 3.35 | 2.01 | 2.93 | 2.65 | 1.02 | 0.96 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Petchdee, S.; Pongkan, W.; Lei, J.; Jaturanratsamee, K.; Bootcha, R.; Meepoo, W.; Panprom, C. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve in Four Dogs: Preliminary Results Regarding Efficacy and Safety. Animals 2024, 14, 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213068
Petchdee S, Pongkan W, Lei J, Jaturanratsamee K, Bootcha R, Meepoo W, Panprom C. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve in Four Dogs: Preliminary Results Regarding Efficacy and Safety. Animals. 2024; 14(21):3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213068
Chicago/Turabian StylePetchdee, Soontaree, Wanpitak Pongkan, Jing Lei, Kotchapol Jaturanratsamee, Ratikorn Bootcha, Wannisa Meepoo, and Chattida Panprom. 2024. "Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve in Four Dogs: Preliminary Results Regarding Efficacy and Safety" Animals 14, no. 21: 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213068
APA StylePetchdee, S., Pongkan, W., Lei, J., Jaturanratsamee, K., Bootcha, R., Meepoo, W., & Panprom, C. (2024). Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve in Four Dogs: Preliminary Results Regarding Efficacy and Safety. Animals, 14(21), 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213068