[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Issue
Volume 2, June
Previous Issue
Volume 1, December
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Life, Volume 2, Issue 1 (March 2012) – 6 articles , Pages 1-214

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
129 KiB  
Editorial
Publication of Controversial Papers in Life
by Shu-Kun Lin
Life 2012, 2(1), 213-214; https://doi.org/10.3390/life2010213 - 3 Feb 2012
Viewed by 21565
Abstract
Life (ISSN 2075-1729, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/life/) is a new journal that deals with new and sometime difficult interdisciplinary matters. Consequently, the journal will occasionally be presented with submitted articles that are controversial and/or outside conventional scientific views. Some papers recently accepted for publication in Life [...] Read more.
Life (ISSN 2075-1729, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/life/) is a new journal that deals with new and sometime difficult interdisciplinary matters. Consequently, the journal will occasionally be presented with submitted articles that are controversial and/or outside conventional scientific views. Some papers recently accepted for publication in Life have attracted significant attention. Moreover, members of the Editorial Board have objected to these papers; some have resigned, and others have questioned the scientific validity of the contributions. In response I want to first state some basic facts regarding all publications in this journal. All papers are peer-reviewed, although it is often difficult to obtain expert reviewers for some of the interdisciplinary topics covered by this journal. I feel obliged to stress that although we will strive to guarantee the scientific standard of the papers published in this journal, all the responsibility for the ideas contained in the published articles rests entirely on their authors. Discussions on previously published articles are welcome and I hope that, by fostering discussion and by keeping an open-minded attitude towards new ideas, the journal will spur progress in this little explored, difficult and very exciting area of knowledge. [...] Full article
768 KiB  
Essay
Primal Eukaryogenesis: On the Communal Nature of Precellular States, Ancestral to Modern Life
by Richard Egel
Life 2012, 2(1), 170-212; https://doi.org/10.3390/life2010170 - 23 Jan 2012
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 18242
Abstract
This problem-oriented, exploratory and hypothesis-driven discourse toward the unknown combines several basic tenets: (i) a photo-active metal sulfide scenario of primal biogenesis in the porespace of shallow sedimentary flats, in contrast to hot deep-sea hydrothermal vent conditions; (ii) an inherently complex communal system [...] Read more.
This problem-oriented, exploratory and hypothesis-driven discourse toward the unknown combines several basic tenets: (i) a photo-active metal sulfide scenario of primal biogenesis in the porespace of shallow sedimentary flats, in contrast to hot deep-sea hydrothermal vent conditions; (ii) an inherently complex communal system at the common root of present life forms; (iii) a high degree of internal compartmentalization at this communal root, progressively resembling coenocytic (syncytial) super-cells; (iv) a direct connection from such communal super-cells to proto-eukaryotic macro-cell organization; and (v) multiple rounds of micro-cellular escape with streamlined reductive evolution—leading to the major prokaryotic cell lines, as well as to megaviruses and other viral lineages. Hopefully, such nontraditional concepts and approaches will contribute to coherent and plausible views about the origins and early life on Earth. In particular, the coevolutionary emergence from a communal system at the common root can most naturally explain the vast discrepancy in subcellular organization between modern eukaryotes on the one hand and both archaea and bacteria on the other. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Origin of Life - Feature Papers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Recasting the early phylogenetic <span class="html-italic">tree of life</span>. The diagram emphasizes an unbroken chain of communal evolution from photo-geochemical reactors and organic molecular ecosystems to complex eukaryotic macro-cells. From the common matrix of communal ancestor states (here conceived as syncytial-like super-cells), prokaryotic micro-cells and acellular viral lineages "escaped" multiple times, as based on partly overlapping sampling of unified genomes from a highly redundant communal <span class="html-italic">gene pool</span> and subsequent clonal propagation. The <span class="html-italic">primal dichotomy</span> between bacterial and archaeal/protoeukaryotic stemlines occurred at the level of communal ancestors. All the composite modern eukaryotes descend from an ancestor that had already adopted some fairly advanced bacteria as permanently integrated mitochondrial endosymbionts. Similarly, cyanobacterial endosymbionts were acquired as plastids by the diverging lineage of green plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Porespace and mineral-facilitated biogenesis. In the multiply connected porespace between sedimented mineral grains (left panel), water can flow in various directions. Confluent layers of biogenic organic hydrogels (right panel, green) accumulate and progressively cover much of the mineral surface, whilst water can still move back and forth through most channels in the porespace network. The organic matrix does not only spread by incremental growth, but also by turbulent currents that redistribute the upper layers of the sediment. This diagram emphasizes the connectivity throughout a contiguous porespace. It does not, however, represent the nanoscale roughness and heterogeneity of the catalytically important mineral grains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photochemical charge separation, coupled to redox reactions. In a colloidal MeS particle (center), absorption of a UVB photon mobilizes an <span class="html-italic">electron</span> (e<sup>-</sup>) of the crystalline lattice into the energetic <span class="html-italic">conductance band</span> (CB). This leaves a complementary void in the lattice, which is conductable, too, as a <span class="html-italic">hole</span> (h<sup>+</sup>) in the <span class="html-italic">valence band</span> (VB). Both these 'bands' represent different levels on an energy scale. Upon reaching the particle surface, e<sup>-</sup> and h<sup>+</sup> can initiate <span class="html-italic">reductive</span> and <span class="html-italic">oxidative</span> biochemical reaction pathways, respectively. Figure modified from Refs. [<a href="#B9-life-02-00170" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B82-life-02-00170" class="html-bibr">82</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Tentative transition of energized electron transfer from mineral grains to membrane assemblages. (<b>a</b>) Peptide-rich micellar patches (pink), together with a rudimentary electron transfer chain, can have assembled at the substratum surface, between the precellular organic matrix (light green) and a larger external photoactive particle (grey), or in close contact with colloidal grains inside. (<b>b</b>) Fully enclosing such colloidal particles in membrane-bounded vesicles could render charge separation more effective. (<b>c</b>) Incorporating organic pigments (green) in the peptide-rich reaction centers could shift the effective bandwidth into the visible part of the sunlight spectrum.</p>
Full article ">
171 KiB  
Communication
The Capricious Character of Nature
by Jaana Keto and Arto Annila
Life 2012, 2(1), 165-169; https://doi.org/10.3390/life2010165 - 11 Jan 2012
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 6275
Abstract
The on-going whole genome sequencing and whole cell assays of metabolites and proteins imply that complex systems could ultimately be mastered by perfecting knowledge into great detail. However, courses of nature are inherently intractable because flows of energy and their driving forces depend [...] Read more.
The on-going whole genome sequencing and whole cell assays of metabolites and proteins imply that complex systems could ultimately be mastered by perfecting knowledge into great detail. However, courses of nature are inherently intractable because flows of energy and their driving forces depend on each other. Thus no data will suffice to predict precisely the outcomes of e.g., engineering experiments. All path-dependent processes, most notably evolution in its entirety, display this capricious character of nature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The notion of energy landscape in evolution is exemplified by an aerial view of Amazonas. The age-old stationary forest ecosystem is perturbed where twists of smoke rise from progressive forest fires. Deforestation exemplifies an intractable thermodynamic process where local means of absorbing insolation are demolished, which in turn will affect the surrounding global system. The ensuing global changes will, in turn, impose further changes in the local system, and so on [<a href="#B28-life-02-00165" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">
623 KiB  
Article
Life Origination Hydrate Hypothesis (LOH-Hypothesis)
by Victor Ostrovskii and Elena Kadyshevich
Life 2012, 2(1), 135-164; https://doi.org/10.3390/life2010135 - 4 Jan 2012
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 8963
Abstract
The paper develops the Life Origination Hydrate Hypothesis (LOH-hypothesis), according to which living-matter simplest elements (LMSEs, which are N-bases, riboses, nucleosides, nucleotides), DNA- and RNA-like molecules, amino-acids, and proto-cells repeatedly originated on the basis of thermodynamically controlled, natural, and inevitable processes governed by [...] Read more.
The paper develops the Life Origination Hydrate Hypothesis (LOH-hypothesis), according to which living-matter simplest elements (LMSEs, which are N-bases, riboses, nucleosides, nucleotides), DNA- and RNA-like molecules, amino-acids, and proto-cells repeatedly originated on the basis of thermodynamically controlled, natural, and inevitable processes governed by universal physical and chemical laws from CH4, niters, and phosphates under the Earth's surface or seabed within the crystal cavities of the honeycomb methane-hydrate structure at low temperatures; the chemical processes passed slowly through all successive chemical steps in the direction that is determined by a gradual decrease in the Gibbs free energy of reacting systems. The hypothesis formulation method is based on the thermodynamic directedness of natural movement and consists ofan attempt to mentally backtrack on the progression of nature and thus reveal principal milestones alongits route. The changes in Gibbs free energy are estimated for different steps of the living-matter origination process; special attention is paid to the processes of proto-cell formation. Just the occurrence of the gas-hydrate periodic honeycomb matrix filled with LMSEs almost completely in its final state accounts for size limitation in the DNA functional groups and the nonrandom location of N-bases in the DNA chains. The slowness of the low-temperature chemical transformations and their “thermodynamic front” guide the gross process of living matter origination and its successive steps. It is shown that the hypothesis is thermodynamically justified and testable and that many observed natural phenomena count in its favor. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Origin of Life - Feature Papers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Hydrate cavities of structures I, II, and H.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Scaled schematic representation of pairing between N-bases of two DNA molecules in the double helix structure; the valence angles are given in degrees, circles of diameter 0.69 nm correspond to the free diameter of the large cavity in hydrate structure II. (<b>b</b>) Scaled schematic representation of a phosphate group inside a small cavity of hydrate structure II; a circle of diameter 0.48 nm corresponds to the free diameter of the small cavity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The living-matter origination evolution sequence according to the LOH-hypothesis.</p>
Full article ">
454 KiB  
Review
Is Life Unique?
by David L. Abel
Life 2012, 2(1), 106-134; https://doi.org/10.3390/life2010106 - 30 Dec 2011
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 21947
Abstract
Is life physicochemically unique? No. Is life unique? Yes. Life manifests innumerable formalisms that cannot be generated or explained by physicodynamics alone. Life pursues thousands of biofunctional goals, not the least of which is staying alive. Neither physicodynamics, nor evolution, pursue goals. Life [...] Read more.
Is life physicochemically unique? No. Is life unique? Yes. Life manifests innumerable formalisms that cannot be generated or explained by physicodynamics alone. Life pursues thousands of biofunctional goals, not the least of which is staying alive. Neither physicodynamics, nor evolution, pursue goals. Life is largely directed by linear digital programming and by the Prescriptive Information (PI) instantiated particularly into physicodynamically indeterminate nucleotide sequencing. Epigenomic controls only compound the sophistication of these formalisms. Life employs representationalism through the use of symbol systems. Life manifests autonomy, homeostasis far from equilibrium in the harshest of environments, positive and negative feedback mechanisms, prevention and correction of its own errors, and organization of its components into Sustained Functional Systems (SFS). Chance and necessity—heat agitation and the cause-and-effect determinism of nature’s orderliness—cannot spawn formalisms such as mathematics, language, symbol systems, coding, decoding, logic, organization (not to be confused with mere self-ordering), integration of circuits, computational success, and the pursuit of functionality. All of these characteristics of life are formal, not physical. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">
1937 KiB  
Article
Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life
by Erik D. Andrulis
Life 2012, 2(1), 1-105; https://doi.org/10.3390/life2010001 - 23 Dec 2011
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 116877
Abstract
Life is an inordinately complex unsolved puzzle. Despite significant theoretical progress, experimental anomalies, paradoxes, and enigmas have revealed paradigmatic limitations. Thus, the advancement of scientific understanding requires new models that resolve fundamental problems. Here, I present a theoretical framework that economically fits evidence [...] Read more.
Life is an inordinately complex unsolved puzzle. Despite significant theoretical progress, experimental anomalies, paradoxes, and enigmas have revealed paradigmatic limitations. Thus, the advancement of scientific understanding requires new models that resolve fundamental problems. Here, I present a theoretical framework that economically fits evidence accumulated from examinations of life. This theory is based upon a straightforward and non-mathematical core model and proposes unique yet empirically consistent explanations for major phenomena including, but not limited to, quantum gravity, phase transitions of water, why living systems are predominantly CHNOPS (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur), homochirality of sugars and amino acids, homeoviscous adaptation, triplet code, and DNA mutations. The theoretical framework unifies the macrocosmic and microcosmic realms, validates predicted laws of nature, and solves the puzzle of the origin and evolution of cellular life in the universe. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Origin of Life - Feature Papers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Core theoretical concepts. (<b>a</b>) Gyromodel chirality. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) Transverse view of a left-handed gyre (levoragyre). (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) Transverse view of a right-handed gyre (dextragyre). The first and second half-turns of the gyres are depicted as bent arrows. White, gyre interior; grey, gyre exterior. (<b>b</b>) Archetypal gyromodel. This gyromodel—supplemented with symbolic variables—is an exemplar for understanding IEM emergence, adaptation, movement, and evolution in the natural world. The bold straight arrows represent IEM directionality. The first bold arrow, from the gyrapex (X<sup>•••</sup>) to the gyradaptor (ʘ), represents mIEM particle (•) attraction (absorption) to the singularity, causing the diquantal dIEM (X<sup>••</sup>) to cycle to the gyrobase. The second bold arrow, from the gyradaptor to the gyrobase, represents the mIEM particle repelled (emitted) from the singularity, ultimately causing the diquantal dIEM to cycle to the gyrapex, restoring the triquantal dIEM (next cycle not shown here). The gyromodel thus depicts an <span class="html-italic">open</span> thermodynamic system. (<b>c</b>) Majorgyres. Majorgyres are the three main gyromodels at the core of each gyrosystem in the theoretical framework: (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) primary (1°) majorgyre; (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) secondary (2°) majorgyre; and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) tertiary (3°) majorgyre. Note how the gyrapex is shared by all three majorgyres. (<b>d</b>) Gyre-quantum equivalence and Matrioshkagyres. <span class="html-italic">Left-side equations</span>. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) The gyre—modeling the cycling • on/in and off/out of X due to the attractorepulsive quantum ʘ—is the compressed into Ⓧ, a quantum. (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) Ⓧ, in turn, is the gyradaptive force responsible for cycling X on/in and off/out of Y. <span class="html-italic">Right-side equations</span>. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) The ʘ is a dextral subgyre (dextrasubgyre) within the levorafocagyre. (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) The levorafocagyre, in turn, is antichiral to the dextrasupragyre. Ⓧ and Ⓨ are thus both antichiral Matrioshkagyres.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Gyromodels of the theoretical framework. (<b>a</b>) Gyromodels of leptonic metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3° electrogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) electron (e). This quantal form and all subsequent forms represent any of the majorgyres or alternagyres (not shown); γ, photon. (<b>b</b>) Gyromodels of oxychemical metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3° oxygyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) oxyon (O). (<b>c</b>) Gyromodels of organochemical metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3° carbogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) carbyon (C). (<b>d</b>) Gyromodels of phosphochemical metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3°phosphogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) phosphon (P). (<b>e</b>) Gyromodels of ribonucleotide metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3° ribogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) ribon (R). (<b>f</b>) Gyromodels of amino acid metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3° aminogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) aminon (A). (<b>g</b>) Gyromodels of deoxynucleotide metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) 1°, (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) 2°, and (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) 3° genogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) genon (D). (<b>h</b>) Gyromodels of cellular metabolism. (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) Hapcellulogyre; (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) dipcellulogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) acellulogyre; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) cellulon (C). Note the repetitive yet chirally oscillating nature of gyrosystems. This figure complements <a href="#life-02-00001-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Understanding singularities. (<b>a-d, f-i</b>) Each singularity (gyre center) is represented as follows: (<span class="html-italic">i</span>) Gyrosystem; (<span class="html-italic">ii</span>) Matrioshkagyre; (<span class="html-italic">iii</span>) bidirectional, linear reaction or process; (<span class="html-italic">iv</span>) gyrequation. (<b>a</b>) Primary (1°) electrogyre(<b>b</b>) Alternoxygyre (<b>c</b>) Primary (1°) carbogyre (<b>d</b>) Alternaphosphogyre; n = any positive integer; P~P is pyrophosphate (<b>e</b>) Matrioshkagyre of the presented electro-, oxy-, carbo-, and phosphogyres (<b>f</b>) Secondary (2°) ribogyre (<b>g</b>) Tertiary (3°) aminogyre. Translation apparatus is the same as aa-3RNA (<b>h</b>) Alternagenogyre (<b>i</b>) Hapcellulogyre. Here, 1N and 2N represent chromosome content (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">en face</span> Matrioshkagyre of the presented ribo-, amino-, geno-, and cellulogyres. Note how the Matrioshkagyre form reveals the nested thermodynamics and accurately positions one physical, chemical, biochemical, or biological process related to another. Acronyms, symbols, and models are defined in <a href="#life-02-00001-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#life-02-00001-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, <a href="#life-02-00001-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#life-02-00001-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>Gyrosystem Forms.</b> (<b>a</b>) Electrogyre. Atomic chirality pictorially represented (oblique view) as electron probability current density for a hydrogenic 2<span class="html-italic">p</span><sub>1/2</sub> stationary state Reprinted and minimally adapted with permission from [<a href="#B212-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">212</a>]. © 1998 American Association of Physics Teachers. (<b>b</b>) Oxygyre. A snapshot of quenched molecular coordinates of nano-ice. Reprinted from [<a href="#B213-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">213</a>]. © 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA. (<b>c</b>) Carbogyre. Amylopectin, or glucose polymers with α(1→4) glycosidic bonds. Stick (left) and space-filling (right) models show how glucose polymers assemble into antiparallel helices. Reprinted from [<a href="#B214-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">214</a>] with permission from Wiley. © 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (<b>d</b>) Phosphogyre. Crystal structure of γ-Ca(PO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> showing unidirectional helical polyphosphate chains stacked in alternating perpendicular directions; Ca, blue; O, red; PO<sub>4</sub> tetrahedra, green. Reprinted from [<a href="#B215-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">215</a>] with permission from Wiley. © 2005, American Chemical Society. (<b>e</b>) Ribogyre. Composite structure of 16S rRNA compiled by comparing vacant <span class="html-italic">Escherichia coli</span> and tRNA-occupied <span class="html-italic">T. thermophilus</span> ribosomes. Note how the RNA right-handed double helices compactify into a matrix. Reprinted from [<a href="#B216-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">216</a>] with permission from Elsevier. (<b>f</b>) Aminogyre. Crystal structure of the RNA exosome complex is a cyclical hexamer of α-helix dense RNase PH subunits. Reprinted and minimally adapted from [<a href="#B217-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">217</a>] with permission from Elsevier. (<b>g</b>) Genogyre. Nucleosome architecture is a right-handed DNA double helix wrapping in a left-handed manner around a histone octamer. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: <span class="html-italic">Nature</span> [<a href="#B218-life-02-00001" class="html-bibr">218</a>], © 1997. (<b>h</b>) Cellulogyre. Photograph of <span class="html-italic">Cirripathes spiralis</span>, a coral species. Image by N. Hobgood; licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Left-to-right theoretical framework. The arrowheads between the gyrosystems (center flow line) represent both the evolutionary process leading up to the origin and evolution of cells and how existing cells work. The self-directed arrows that are above and below the gyrosystems represent autoregulation. The arrowed lines above the center line depict the feedforward between and among gyrosystems; those below the line depict feedback. The gyrosystem interactions discussed the most in the text are labeled as dark lines. The dotted lines represent empirically definable or predicted gyrosystem flow. Those arrowheads that flow into the electrogyre (the photon from the left) and flow out of the cellulogyre (to the right) depict the evolutionary steps prior to and following the origin of visible matter and the cell, respectively; these are either briefly mentioned or not discussed in this study. Please note the unity of reality and life as revealed by this theory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Within-to-without theoretical framework. The electrogyre (where e<sup>γ</sup> denotes all lepton potentialities) is within the oxygyre (where O<sup>e</sup> denotes all oxyon potentialities) which is within the carbogyre (where C<sup>O</sup> denotes all carbyon potentialities) which is within the phosphogyre (where P<sup>C</sup> denotes all phosphon potentialities) which is within the ribogyre (where R<sup>P</sup> denotes all ribon potentialities) which is within the aminogyre (where A<sup>R</sup> denotes all aminon potentialities) which is within the genogyre (where D<sup>A</sup> denotes all genon potentialities) which is within the cellulogyre (where Ç<sup>D</sup> denotes all cellulon potentialities). Matrioshkagyres—nested antichiral gyres—achieve homeostasis by reducing the rate of IEM metabolism and flow between, among, and within gyrosystems. Time flows from within to without: microcosmically, the rate of each cycle decelerates, as an electron cycles much faster than a cell cycles; macrocosmically, the rate of each cycle decelerates, as planetary axial rotation cycle is relativistically faster than the existential cycle of a particular cellular species. Please consider the widening gyre in light of universal expansion.</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop