[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Classification of Karst Rocky Desertification Levels in Jinsha County Using a Feature Space Method Based on SDGSAT-1 Multispectral Data
Previous Article in Journal
Significant Wave Height Retrieval in Tropical Cyclone Conditions Using CYGNSS Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Fast Two-Dimensional Direction-of-Arrival Estimator Using Array Manifold Matrix Learning
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

Research on 2-D Direction of Arrival (DOA) Estimation for an L-Shaped Array

1
School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
3
Whale Wave Technology Inc., Kunming 650200, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4787; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244787
Submission received: 11 November 2024 / Revised: 13 December 2024 / Accepted: 20 December 2024 / Published: 22 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ocean Remote Sensing Based on Radar, Sonar and Optical Techniques)

Abstract

:
Lately, there has been a significant increase in interest in coprime array configurations, as they offer the advantage of generating more extensive array apertures and enhanced degrees of freedom when contrasted with standard linear arrays. This document introduces an innovative two-dimensional direction-of-arrival (2-D DOA) estimation technique founded on the zero-completion principle. In particular, our initial step involves interpolating the synthetic co-array signals to achieve completion, followed by the regeneration of the covariance matrix utilizing the interpolated synthetic signals. Then, the 2-D angle estimation is realized based on the complemented matrix using the auto-pairing method. The computational modeling outcomes indicate that the suggested method demonstrates superior angular discriminability. Moreover, this method excels in estimation accuracy when contrasted with its algorithmic counterparts.

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2-D) direction of arrival (DOA) estimation has a wide range of applications in the fields of communication, sonar, hydroacoustic localization, etc. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Circular arrays, L-shaped arrays, rectangular arrays, etc., have been proposed in recent decades [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The L-shaped array configuration boasts superior angular resolution capabilities and is straightforward to construct [19,20,21], making 2-D direction determination for this type of array the most widely pursued topic in research.
In order to realize 2-D DOA estimation more accurately, many scholars have proposed various 2-D DOA estimation algorithms. In [22] introduces an innovative technique for automatic pairing, which employs the collaborative singular value decomposition technique to handle a pair of cross-correlation matrices, aiming to enhance the accuracy of 2-D DOA estimation. This approach surpasses the traditional CCM-ESPRIT algorithm, particularly in scenarios with a low SNR and minimal angular disparity. In [23], a new sparse L-shaped electromagnetic vector sensor MIMO radar framework for 2-D DOA estimation is proposed. Existing electromagnetic vector sensor—multiple inputs and multiple outputs—radar arrays struggle to strike a good balance between estimation accuracy and computational burden. The sparse L-shaped array topology in this paper has a large sensor spacing, which can effectively reduce the mutual coupling effect and improve the angular resolution. A fast algorithm is proposed in this article to achieve more accurate DOA estimation by combining ambiguous and high-resolution directional cosine estimation with unambiguous but low-resolution estimation. Ultimately, the theoretical derivation is validated by simulation results, showing that the method outperforms existing techniques with better flexibility and accuracy. In [24], a 2-D DOA-assisted framework based on electromagnetic vector sensors and monostatic multiple-input–multiple-output radar for anonymous unmanned aerial vehicle localization is proposed. The framework considers multipath effects and employs the rearrangement multiple signal classification algorithm, which significantly improves the localization accuracy and robustness for antenna arrays with different geometric configurations. In [14], 2-D DOA estimation using polarized uniform rectangular arrays is proposed to address the challenges of coherent signals under multipath propagation. The rank defect of the source matrix is solved by modeling and rearranging the parallel factors, and the vector cross-product-assisted rotation invariant technique is used to achieve high-accuracy estimation. In [25] presents an improved algorithm for 2-D DOA estimation using electromagnetic vector sensor rectangular arrays under multipath propagation conditions. The method solves the rank deficiency problem by matrix rearrangement and is applicable to single snapshot scenarios, demonstrating superior accuracy and computational efficiency. In [26], a novel parallel synthetic mutual mass array for 2-D DOA and polarization estimation is proposed, aiming to improve the multiparameter estimation performance. By reducing the mutual coupling between antennas and the hardware cost, combined with the compressed sensing method, it demonstrates superior performance compared to existing techniques for target detection and identification in complex electromagnetic environments. In [27] presents a low-computational-complexity 2-D DOA estimation method designed for L-shaped arrays. The technique leverages the symmetrical properties of the array manifold matrix’s conjugate to amplify the functional array opening, merging the propagator approach with the ESPRIT technique for spontaneous pairing, thereby eliminating the need for spectral scanning and repetitive cycles. Tests have confirmed that this approach surpasses the performance of traditional algorithms. In [28], a new 2-D DOA estimation method is proposed for non-coherent distributed sources considering gain-phase perturbations in massive multiple-input and multiple-output systems. By establishing a subspace framework and constrained optimization, the authors jointly estimate the nominal DOA, angular expansion, and gain-phase perturbations, providing a solution that is efficient and suitable for real-time applications. In [29] proposed a joint 2-D DOA estimation method for L-shaped arrays based on a compressed perception framework. By introducing a separable observation model, the authors decompose the joint spatial–temporal parameters into three small matrices, which are estimated using L1-paradigm minimization and Bayesian compressed perception algorithms, and numerical simulations verify their effectiveness and superiority. Using sparse L-shaped arrays, in [30] presents a novel technique for 2-D DOA estimation. The technique lowers the computational cost and increases the accuracy of the estimation by utilizing the cross-covariance matrix to create a signal subspace from a combination of a sparse and a uniform linear array. In [31], an innovative scheme for 2-D DOA and polarization detection is introduced for millimeter-wave polarized MIMO arrays, utilizing a compact sampling methodology. The method provides an efficient estimation scheme with low computational complexity and robustness to sensor position errors for a wide range of sensor geometries by reducing the data dimensions, computing the signal subspace, and exploiting the rotational invariance property. In [32] proposed a new method for 2-D DOA estimation based on active hypersurfaces that utilizes non-uniform periodic time modulation to reduce hardware complexity. With amplifier integration, the system achieves high-accuracy (maximum error of 0.31°) multi-source direction estimation for applications such as IoT, wireless communication and radar. In [33] presents a novel polarized smart reflective surface architecture designed for the 2D-DOA estimation of non-line-of-sight signals. The authors develop a normalized vector cross-product estimator that avoids complex data recovery and grid searches, thus improving efficiency. By deploying electromagnetic vector sensor arrays at both the base station and the IRS, the article demonstrates that the method is capable of efficient 2-D-DOA estimation without requiring any a priori knowledge of the base station-IRS channel. In [34] proposed a deep-learning-based 2-D DOA estimation method that uses an L-shaped array to simultaneously estimate the elevation and azimuth angles of a signal. With two classification neural networks, the method performs superiorly in low SNR and highly correlated signal environments, significantly outperforming existing conventional and deep learning methods. In [35] presents a resource-efficient tensorized deep neural network for the 2-D DOA estimation of uniform rectangular arrays. The trainable parameters are compressed by propagating the covariance tensor to the hidden state tensor via an inverse tucker decomposition. The network significantly reduces the number of parameters, improves training speed, and reduces GPU memory usage while maintaining good estimation accuracy under non-ideal conditions. Simulation results show that the method outperforms traditional matrix-based neural networks and model-based methods in terms of training efficiency and computational performance. In [36] introduced an innovative design of a triple-concurrent compact nested antenna array to enhance the precision in 2-D DOA estimation. This configuration addresses the issue of angular resolution ambiguity through the expansion of the array’s effective area and the minimization of element interaction. By integrating the principles of BOMP with the CMT-BCS algorithm, the experimental outcomes indicate a superior performance compared to conventional methodologies.
In order to obtain a more accurate 2-D angle estimation, in this paper, a 2-D DOA algorithm based on interpolation complementation for L-shaped arrays is proposed, which first utilizes larger apertures and higher degrees of freedom. The complementary zeroes are utilized to complement the pairs of matrices. Finally, the DOA estimation of 2-D corners is realized by using the effective array aperture expansion technique. The computational modeling outcomes indicate that the proposed method excels in both the precision of estimation and the quality of angular discrimination. The primary contributions presented in this article can be outlined as follows:
(1) This paper proposes a covariance matrix reconstruction algorithm based on zero completion. The algorithm makes full use of the independent virtual array elements of the L-type array structure based on coprime arrays for DOA estimation.
(2) We utilize the zero-complement reconstructed covariance matrix and then combine the propagator method and ESPRIT method for DOA estimation. The method realizes 2-D angle auto-matching.
(3) Computational modeling results show that the proposed 2-D DOA estimation algorithm performs well in improving angular accuracy. In addition, the algorithm outperforms conventional algorithms in terms of direction-of-arrival estimation performance.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: The second part presents the signal model. The third part presents the proposed methodology. The fourth part presents the simulation. The paper concludes with a summary.

2. Signal Model

A uniform linear orthogonal array with a d spacing between two sensors forms an x z plane L-shaped array configuration, as shown in Figure 1. The e L-shaped coprime array located in the x z plane consists of two coprime arrays. Each conjugate array S i has | S i |   = 2 M i + N i 1 physical sensors and consists of two sparse ULAs. Note that M i and N i are mutually prime integers, and the two sparse ULAs contain 2 M i and 2 N i physical sensors with corresponding spacings of N i d and M i d , where d = λ / 2 and λ denotes the carrier wavelength.
Suppose there are Q unrelated far-field narrowband source signals incident onto an L-shaped array from the { ( θ q , φ q ) , q 1 , Q } directions, where θ q [ 0 , π ] and phi φ q [ 0 , π ] represent the azimuth and elevation angles of the qth source signal, respectively. Denote S x ( t ) and S z ( t ) as the information vectors captured by the coprime array S x and the coprime array S z at the instant t, respectively, and these can be formulated as follows:
x ( t ) = B x s ( t ) + n x ( t )
z ( t ) = B z s ( t ) + n z ( t )
where n x ( t ) and n z ( t ) are additive Gaussian white noise obeying CN ( 0 , σ n 2 I ) ,
B x = b x ( θ 1 ) , b x ( θ 2 ) , , b x ( θ Q ) ,
b x ( θ q ) = e j π S x ( 1 ) cos θ q , , e j π S x ( | S x | ) cos θ q T ,
B z = b z ( φ 1 ) , b z ( φ 2 ) , , b z ( φ Q ) ,
b z ( φ q ) = e j π S z ( 1 ) cos φ q , , e j π S z ( | S z | ) cos φ q T .
Next, x ( t ) and z ( t ) can be represented as
R x z = E x ( t ) z H ( t ) = A x R ss A z H ,
where R ss = E s ( t ) s H ( t ) = d i a g ( p ) , and p = [ σ 1 2 , σ 2 2 , , σ Q 2 ] T is the source signal power vector.
Considering that there is no precise covariance matrix R x , in practice, its sample version can be used to approximate it
R ^ x z = 1 T t = 1 T x ( t ) z H ( t ) ,
where T is the number of snapshots.

3. Proposed Method

In this section, we first use the mutual prime array arrival method of virtual array interpolation to achieve completion based on the virtual common array signal y. Then, the effective array aperture expansion technique is used for 2-D angle estimation.

3.1. Virtual Array Completion

Vectorizing R xz yields the following virtual co-array signal
y = v e c ( R xz ) = ( A z * A x ) p .
Due to the contamination of model noise affecting the recurring components within the estimated y v , as detailed subsequently, an aggregation process is employed that involves averaging all duplicate elements [37]. Consequently, the conversion from y v to y c is realized through the utilization of the transformation matrix D , that is,
y x z = D y ,
where each entry in the successive line of matrix D represents the mean multiplier pertaining to the respective element in vector y, with matrix D adhering to the following condition
D i , j = δ [ μ c ] i , [ μ v ] j j = 1 ( 2 M + N 1 ) 2 δ [ μ c ] i , [ μ v ] f ,
i = 1 , 2 , , 3 M N + M N ,   j = 1 , 2 , , ( 2 M + N 1 ) 2 , and the expression δ p , q represents the Kronecker delta. Equation (11) is derived from the principle that the shift from y to y x z is analogous to the shift from μ to μ x z , implying that the matrix D adheres to the relation μ = D μ x z .
The interpolated virtual array signal y can be initialized as
[ y ] i = [ y ¯ w ] i , i S W , 0 , i S I S W ,
where [ · ] i is the virtual signal of the virtual sensor at position i. S W is the virtual sensor of the difference array and S I is all the virtual sensors containing the holes.
According to the Vandermonde decomposition lemma [38], there exists a variable vector z satisfying
T z = k = 1 K p k r ( θ k ) r H ( θ k ) ,
where p k denotes the power of the k-th source signal. r ( θ k ) 2 = L , where L is the overlapping subarray. We can denote T z as
[ T z ] 2 = k = 1 K p k r θ k r H θ k 2 .
Since the Toeplitz matrix T z is the covariance matrix of the signals received by the reference virtual array, it can be derived from the principal square root of YY H . We can obtain
R ˜ v 2 = = 1 L y ˜ y ˜ H = Y ˜ Y ˜ H ,
where R ˜ v C L × L , Y ˜ = [ y ˜ 1 , y ˜ 2 , , y ˜ L ] .
The problem of minimizing the atomic paradigm through [39] of the Toeplitz covariance matrix reconstruction can be expressed as follows:
min z C L 1 2 T z G R ˜ v F 2 + τ z A r subject to T z 0 .
where G R L × L , τ is a regularization parameter and A r is an atom set.

3.2. Two-Dimensional DOA Estimation

We divide the inter-correlation matrix R x z into two matrices of size M × ( M 1 ) by virtual array complement optimization to obtain [27]
Y 1 = T z ( : , 1 : M 1 ) ,
Y 2 = T z ( : , 2 : M ) ,
after which construct the following two new interrelated submatrices are obtained as follows:
Y 3 = J M Y 2 * J M 1 ,
Y 4 = J M Y 1 * J M 1 ,
where J M is a Vandermonde matrix. Thus, we obtain the large matrix of received data
Y = [ Y 1 T , Y 2 T , Y 3 T , Y 4 T ] T .
The autocorrelation matrix of the signal is obtained by normalizing the product of the signal matrix with its conjugate transpose
R yy = Y Y T / T ,
and the first K columns and columns K+1 to 4M of the matrix H are extracted to form a new matrix
R yy 1 = H ( : , 1 : K ) T
R yy 2 = H ( : , K + 1 : 4 M ) T ,
where H = R y y T .
We define two orientation selection matrices
G x , 1 = I 4 [ I M 1 , 0 ( M 1 ) × 1 ]
G x , 2 = I 4 [ 0 ( M 1 ) × 1 , I M 1 ] .
After that, we can obtain
[ U x , Φ x ] = e i g ( ( G x 1 P e ) G x 2 P e ) ,
where Φ x = diag ( Φ x ) T .
Define two elevation selection matrices for automatic pairing
G z , 1 = I 2 [ I M , 0 M × M ]
G z , 2 = I 2 [ 0 M × M , I M ] .
We have access to
Φ z = ( G z 2 P e A ^ x z 1 ) G z 1 P e A ^ x z 1 ,
where A ^ x z 1 = U x , Φ z = diag ( Φ z ) T .
Finally, we can obtain an estimate of the azimuth and pitch angles
θ ^ k = arccos angle Φ ˜ x ( k , k ) λ / ( 2 π d )
ϕ ^ k = arccos angle Φ ˜ z ( k , k ) λ / ( 2 π d ) .

4. Numerical Simulations

Initially, the efficacy of the 2-D direction detection is assessed utilizing the root mean square error (RMSE), and its formulation is specified as
R M S E = 1 K Q k = 1 K q = 1 Q θ ^ q k θ q 2 + φ ^ q k φ q 2 ,
where K = 500 represents the number of Monte Carlo trials and θ ^ q k and φ ^ q k represent the qth estimated azimuth and elevation angles for the kth trial, respectively. The operating system used is Windows, running on an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 CPU at 3.20 GHz. The programming language was developed under Matlab 2022 (a).
We evaluated the various algorithms’ resolutions in the first simulation. Ten sensors were used, and T = 500 snapshots were taken. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is fixed to 0 dB, and the 10 sources are uniformly distributed in the range [30°–150°], i.e., ( 30 , 30 ) , ( 43 . 33 , 43 . 33 ) , ( 56 . 67 , 56 . 67 ) , ( 70 , 70 ) , ( 83 . 33 , 83 . 33 ) , ( 96 . 67 , 96 . 67 ) , ( 110 , 110 ) , ( 123 . 33 , 123 . 33 ) , ( 136 . 67 , 136 . 67 ) , ( 150 , 150 ) .
The outcomes of DOA estimation utilizing the discrete inverse Fourier transform (DFT) [4] technique are depicted in Figure 2a, where two out of ten sources are not recognized and three sources are recognized with large errors. The recognition results of the joint singular value decomposition (JSVD) [22] algorithm are shown in Figure 2b. For the JSVD recognition results, there are five signal sources with large errors. the recognition results of the low-computation-complexity method (LCCM) [27] algorithm are shown in Figure 2c. It can be seen that there are three signal sources with large recognition errors. The recognition angles of the proposed method are shown in Figure 2d, and only one estimated angle has a slight error. It is evident that the suggested approach surpasses current techniques in terms of a more precise estimation of the DOA.
In the experiments in the spatial spectrum, we consider three uncorrelated source signals [25°,15°], [45°,35°] and [70°,55°]. The SNR and snapshots are configured as 5 dB and 1000, respectively. Figure 3 shows that the DFT and JSVD algorithms have large sidelobes, and the sidelobes of the proposed algorithm are minimized. In summary, the proposed algorithm achieves better DOA estimation performance.
The DOA performance is compared with the known algorithms, including DFT, JSVD, and LCCM, to validate the DOA accuracy of the proposed algorithm. Assuming 10 physical arrays are used, it is estimated that 10 independent sources are ( 30 , 30 ) , ( 43 . 33 , 43 . 33 ) , ( 56 . 67 , 56 . 67 ) , ( 70 , 70 ) , ( 83 . 33 , 83 . 33 ) , ( 96 . 67 , 96 . 67 ) , ( 110 , 110 ) , ( 123 . 33 , 123 . 33 ) , ( 136 . 67 , 136 . 67 ) , ( 150 , 150 ) . A consistent total of 500 snapshots is maintained, while the SNR is adjusted across a range from −10 dB up to 30 dB to assess the system’s performance under diverse SNR conditions. In parallel, a variation of sample sizes from 100 to 1000 is tested, with the SNR held steady at 5 dB, to evaluate the system’s effectiveness with varying snapshot counts. Here, we also introduce CRB as a reference curve [40].
The illustrations in Figure 4a,b depict that the RMSE for DOA estimation diminishes as the SNR or the count of snapshots rises, confirming the efficacy of the suggested DOA estimation technique. Additionally, the RMSE metrics for the suggested approach are consistently lower compared to those of the DFT, JSVD, and LCCM algorithms in both scenarios, suggesting that the proposed technique outperforms the other three in terms of DOA estimation accuracy across varying SNR levels and snapshot counts.
In the simulation of the effect of the number of arrays on the algorithm, 8, 10, 12, and 14 physical sensors were used. The parameters were the same as in the previous simulation. As can be seen from Figure 5a,b, in both the SNR and the number of snapshots, a smaller RMSE is obtained with the increase in the number of physical arrays.
In the RMSE simulation with a CA structure and an ACA structure, for 10 physical sensors, CA takes M = 5, N = 6, while ACA takes M = 3, N = 5. Other simulation parameters are consistent with the above simulation. As can be seen from Figure 6a,b, the RMSE performance of the proposed zero-complement structure is better than the traditional array structure, indicating that the complement structure can increase the number of available virtual arrays and thus obtain better performance.
In the RMSE performance experiments at 1/Sqrt(T) and 1/Sqrt(SNR), we consider three uncorrelated source signals, [25°,15°], [45°,35°], and [70°,55°]. The snap count is set to 100 to 800 intervals of 100, and SNR is set to 1 to 20 intervals of 4. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show that the DFT algorithm has the largest RMSE followed by the JSVD algorithm, and the proposed algorithm has the smallest RMSE. The RMSE increases and tends to 1 as 1/Sqrt(T) and 1/Sqrt(SNR) increase, which is in line with the theoretical principles.
Finally, we compared the computation times of various algorithms. In this example, we considered five uncorrelated source signals impacting the array structure. The SNR and snapshots were configured to 5 dB and 500, respectively. Table 1 shows the computation times of various algorithms after executing 1000 Monte Carlo trials. It can be observed that the DFT algorithm has the highest computational complexity, followed by the JSVD algorithm. The proposed algorithm is close to the LCCM. In summary, the proposed algorithm demonstrates the best overall performance.

5. Conclusions

This study presents an innovative 2-D DOA estimation technique based on the zero-complement method. The method spontaneously pairs 2-D angles by reconstructing the covariance matrix. The proposed algorithm is compared with DFT, JSVD, and LCCM algorithms. The results of computational simulations show that the proposed technique has excellent angular resolution capability. Moreover, in terms of DOA estimation accuracy, the proposed technique surpasses the performance of conventional methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Y. and X.Z.; methodology, K.Y. and X.Z.; software, K.Y.; validation, K.Y., S.H. and L.Z.; formal analysis, K.Y.; investigation, K.Y.; resources, K.Y.; data curation, L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.H. and L.Z.; visualization, K.Y.; supervision, H.S.; project administration, L.Z.; funding acquisition, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Yunnan Xing-dian Yingcai Support Program Industrial Innovative Talents project and the Natural Resources Science and Technology Innovation Project of Fujian KY-080000-04-2022-025.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Xuebo Zhang was employed by the company Whale Wave Technology Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

The symbols used and the meanings attached to them.
A , a Matrices, vectors
I Identity matrix
A Set
( · ) T and ( · ) H transpose and Hermitian transpose
Hadamard product
( · ) * complex conjugate transpose
E ( · ) Expectation operator
v e c ( · ) Vectorization operator
Khatri-Rao product
( · ) pseudoinverse

References

  1. Gu, Y.; Goodman, N.A.; Ashok, A. Radar target profiling and recognition based on TSI-optimized compressive sensing kernel. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2014, 62, 3194–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ye, K.; Zhou, L.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Y.; Hong, S.; Zhang, X.; Sun, H. DOA estimation based on a novel shifted coprime array structure. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2024, 179, 155308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, X.; Yang, P.; Wang, Y.; Shen, W.; Yang, J.; Ye, K.; Zhou, M.; Sun, H. LBF-based CS algorithm for multireceiver SAS. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2024, 21, 1502505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, C.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Shi, Z. An IDFT approach for coprime array direction-of-arrival estimation. Digit. Signal Process. 2019, 94, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, C.; Gu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, Y.D. Off-grid direction-of-arrival estimation using coprime array interpolation. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2018, 25, 1710–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ye, K.; Wu, S.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, L.; Xiao, L.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Lin, J. Transfer-Learning-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Antenna Array. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, X.; Yang, P.; Wang, Y.; Shen, W.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Ye, K.; Zhou, M.; Sun, H. A novel multireceiver sas rd processor. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 4203611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, L.; Ye, K.; Qi, J.; Sun, H. DOA estimation based on pseudo-noise subspace for relocating enhanced nested array. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2022, 29, 1858–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ye, K.; Cai, Y.; Hong, S.; Sun, H. Direction-of-arrival estimation based on difference-sum co-array of a special coprime array. Electron. Lett. 2023, 59, e12701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, Z.; Mu, S. 2-D Direction FindingWith Pair-Matching Operation for L-Shaped Nested Array. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2020, 25, 975–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tayem, N.; Kwon, H.M. L-shape 2-dimensional arrival angle estimation with propagator method. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2005, 53, 1622–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tayem, N.; Majeed, K.; Hussain, A.A. Two-dimensional DOA estimation using cross-correlation matrix with L-shaped array. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 15, 1077–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zoltowski, M.D.; Haardt, M.; Mathews, C.P. Closed-form 2-D angle estimation with rectangular arrays in element space or beamspace via unitary ESPRIT. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1996, 44, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Z.; Wen, F.; Shi, J.; He, J.; Truong, T.K. 2D-DOA Estimation for Coherent Signals via a Polarized Uniform Rectangular Array. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2023, 30, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heidenreich, P.; Zoubir, A.M.; Rubsamen, M. Joint 2-D DOA estimation and phase calibration for uniform rectangular arrays. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2012, 60, 4683–4693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, T.; Lu, Y.; Hui, H. Compensation for the mutual coupling effect in uniform circular arrays for 2D DOA estimations employing the maximum likelihood technique. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2008, 44, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mathews, C.P.; Zoltowski, M.D. Eigenstructure techniques for 2-D angle estimation with uniform circular arrays. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1994, 42, 2395–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Sheikh, Y.A.; Ye, Z. A rank-reduction based 2-D DOA estimation algorithm for three parallel uniform linear arrays. Signal Process. 2016, 120, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nie, X.; Li, L. A computationally efficient subspace algorithm for 2-D DOA estimation with L-shaped array. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2014, 21, 971–974. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang, J.; Liu, D. Joint elevation and azimuth direction finding using L-shaped array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 2136–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, G.; Xin, J.; Zheng, N.; Sano, A. Computationally efficient subspace-based method for two-dimensional direction estimation with L-shaped array. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2011, 59, 3197–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, J.F.; Wei, P. Joint SVD of Two Cross-Correlation Matrices to Achieve Automatic Pairing in 2-D Angle Estimation Problems. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2007, 6, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wen, F.; Shi, J.; He, J.; Truong, T.K. 2D-DOD and 2D-DOA estimation using sparse L-shaped EMVS-MIMO radar. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022, 59, 2077–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wen, F.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, H.; Gui, G.; Sari, H.; Adachi, F. 2D-DOA estimation auxiliary localization of anonymous UAV using EMVS-MIMO radar. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 16255–16266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Shi, J. 2D-DOA Estimation in Multipath Using EMVS Rectangle Array. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Y.; Shan, M.; Jiang, G. 2D DOA and Polarization Estimation Using Parallel Synthetic Coprime Array of Non-Collocated EMVSs. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, Y.Y.; Dong, C.X.; Xu, J.; Zhao, G.Q. Computationally efficient 2-D DOA estimation for L-shaped array with automatic pairing. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1669–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tian, Y.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Liu, S.; Dong, Z. 2-D DOA estimation of incoherently distributed sources considering gain-phase perturbations in massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 21, 1143–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shixin, W.; Yuan, Z.; Ibrahim, L.; Ying, X.; Jun, W.; Bin, T. Joint 2D DOA and Doppler frequency estimation for L-shaped array using compressive sensing. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2020, 31, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gu, J.F.; Zhu, W.P.; Swamy, M. Joint 2-D DOA estimation via sparse L-shaped array. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2015, 63, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wen, F.; Gui, G.; Gacanin, H.; Sari, H. Compressive sampling framework for 2D-DOA and polarization estimation in mmWave polarized massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 22, 3071–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, D.; Wang, X.; Han, J.; Xue, H.; Liu, G.; Shi, Y.; Li, L.; Cui, T.J. Accurate 2-D DOA estimation based on active metasurface with nonuniformly periodic time modulation. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2022, 71, 3424–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wen, F.; Wang, H.; Gui, G.; Sari, H.; Adachi, F. Polarized intelligent reflecting surface aided 2d-doa estimation for nlos sources. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 8085–8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fadakar, A.; Jafari, A.; Tavana, P.; Jahani, R.; Akhavan, S. Deep learning based 2D-DOA estimation using L-shaped arrays. J. Frankl. Inst. 2024, 361, 106743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, H.; Shi, Z.; Zhou, C.; Vorobyov, S.A.; Gu, Y. Deep Tensor 2-D DOA Estimation for URA. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2024, 72, 4065–4080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, G.; Huang, J.; Yang, Y. High-accuracy 2D DOA estimation with three parallel sparse nested array. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2024, 179, 155319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pan, Y.; Luo, G.Q. Efficient direction-of-arrival estimation via annihilating-based denoising with coprime array. Signal Process. 2021, 184, 108061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stoica, P.; Moses, R. Spectral Analysis of Signals; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou, C.; Gu, Y.; Fan, X.; Shi, Z.; Mao, G.; Zhang, Y.D. Direction-of-arrival estimation for coprime array via virtual array interpolation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2018, 66, 5956–5971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, C.L.; Vaidyanathan, P. Cramér–Rao bounds for coprime and other sparse arrays, which find more sources than sensors. Digit. Signal Process. 2017, 61, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Array structure.
Figure 1. Array structure.
Remotesensing 16 04787 g001
Figure 2. DOA estimation results obtained by different algorithms. (a) DFT. (b) JSVD. (c) LCCM. (d) Proposed. (Red crosses indicate estimated results, while blue circles indicate actual values).
Figure 2. DOA estimation results obtained by different algorithms. (a) DFT. (b) JSVD. (c) LCCM. (d) Proposed. (Red crosses indicate estimated results, while blue circles indicate actual values).
Remotesensing 16 04787 g002
Figure 3. Spatial spectrum of DOA estimation by different algorithms. (a) DFT. (b) JSVD. (c) LCCM. (d) Proposed.
Figure 3. Spatial spectrum of DOA estimation by different algorithms. (a) DFT. (b) JSVD. (c) LCCM. (d) Proposed.
Remotesensing 16 04787 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of the RMSE performance of DFT, JSVD, and LCCM and the proposed (a) number of snapshots. (b) SNR.
Figure 4. Comparison of the RMSE performance of DFT, JSVD, and LCCM and the proposed (a) number of snapshots. (b) SNR.
Remotesensing 16 04787 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of RMSE performance of the proposed algorithm under different physical sensors: (a) the number of snapshots. (b) SNR.
Figure 5. Comparison of RMSE performance of the proposed algorithm under different physical sensors: (a) the number of snapshots. (b) SNR.
Remotesensing 16 04787 g005
Figure 6. RMSE performance comparison of array structures: (a) number of snapshots. (b) SNR.
Figure 6. RMSE performance comparison of array structures: (a) number of snapshots. (b) SNR.
Remotesensing 16 04787 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of RMSE performance at 1/Sqrt(T).
Figure 7. Comparison of RMSE performance at 1/Sqrt(T).
Remotesensing 16 04787 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of RMSE performance at 1/Sqrt(SNR).
Figure 8. Comparison of RMSE performance at 1/Sqrt(SNR).
Remotesensing 16 04787 g008
Table 1. Processing time for the algorithm.
Table 1. Processing time for the algorithm.
AlgorithmProcessing Time
DFT1.6308 s
JSVD0.6292 s
LCCM0.0339 s
The proposed method0.0509 s
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, K.; Zhou, L.; Hong, S.; Zhang, X.; Sun, H. Research on 2-D Direction of Arrival (DOA) Estimation for an L-Shaped Array. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244787

AMA Style

Ye K, Zhou L, Hong S, Zhang X, Sun H. Research on 2-D Direction of Arrival (DOA) Estimation for an L-Shaped Array. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(24):4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Kun, Lang Zhou, Shaohua Hong, Xuebo Zhang, and Haixin Sun. 2024. "Research on 2-D Direction of Arrival (DOA) Estimation for an L-Shaped Array" Remote Sensing 16, no. 24: 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244787

APA Style

Ye, K., Zhou, L., Hong, S., Zhang, X., & Sun, H. (2024). Research on 2-D Direction of Arrival (DOA) Estimation for an L-Shaped Array. Remote Sensing, 16(24), 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244787

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop