mmWave High Gain Planar H-Shaped Shorted Ring Antenna Array
School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(18), 5168; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185168
Submission received: 13 August 2020
/
Revised: 31 August 2020
/
Accepted: 9 September 2020
/
Published: 10 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Millimeter-Wave Antenna Arrays: Design, Challenges, and Applications)
Download keyboard_arrow_down
Figure 1
<p>Reflection coefficient and directivity behaviors for (<b>a</b>) different types of planar patches and (<b>b</b>) a proposed slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin.</p> "> Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Reflection coefficient and directivity behaviors for (<b>a</b>) different types of planar patches and (<b>b</b>) a proposed slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Proposed antenna structure with (<b>a</b>) multi-layer information and (<b>b</b>) layer 1 and layer 2.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Proposed antenna structure with impedance variation according to Cx value.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Simulated results for (<b>a</b>) reflection coefficient and maximum directivity according to Cx values, and (<b>b</b>) radiation patterns of the proposed and conventional patch antennas.</p> "> Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Simulated results for (<b>a</b>) reflection coefficient and maximum directivity according to Cx values, and (<b>b</b>) radiation patterns of the proposed and conventional patch antennas.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (<b>a</b>) multi-layer view and (<b>b</b>) surface current on array elements synchronization by a guide-ring.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Implementation of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (<b>a</b>) fabrication photo and (<b>b</b>) simulated and measured reflection coefficients.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna in (<b>a</b>) xz-plane and (<b>b</b>) yz-plane at 28 GHz.</p> ">
Versions Notes
<p>Reflection coefficient and directivity behaviors for (<b>a</b>) different types of planar patches and (<b>b</b>) a proposed slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin.</p> "> Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Reflection coefficient and directivity behaviors for (<b>a</b>) different types of planar patches and (<b>b</b>) a proposed slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Proposed antenna structure with (<b>a</b>) multi-layer information and (<b>b</b>) layer 1 and layer 2.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Proposed antenna structure with impedance variation according to Cx value.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Simulated results for (<b>a</b>) reflection coefficient and maximum directivity according to Cx values, and (<b>b</b>) radiation patterns of the proposed and conventional patch antennas.</p> "> Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Simulated results for (<b>a</b>) reflection coefficient and maximum directivity according to Cx values, and (<b>b</b>) radiation patterns of the proposed and conventional patch antennas.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (<b>a</b>) multi-layer view and (<b>b</b>) surface current on array elements synchronization by a guide-ring.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Implementation of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (<b>a</b>) fabrication photo and (<b>b</b>) simulated and measured reflection coefficients.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna in (<b>a</b>) xz-plane and (<b>b</b>) yz-plane at 28 GHz.</p> ">
Abstract
:A new design approach for a mmWave high gain planar antenna is presented. The proposed method can increase antenna directivity with a minimally enlarged radiation patch while the operation frequency is still matched at a higher target frequency. The fundamental structure of the proposed antenna is configured by a H-shaped and slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin symmetrically located across a signal excitation port. Further, to match the operation frequency with the frequency for the highest achievable gain, a vertically stacked matching conductor was inserted along the signal feed path between the radiation patch and the ground layer. The proposed single antenna showed the simulated directivity of 9.46 dBi while the conventional patch with a same dielectric had 8.07 dBi. To verify practical performance, a 2 × 2 array antenna was fabricated at 28 GHz and showed the measured gain of 12.5 dBi including the array feed loss.
1. Introduction
In order to meet the increasing demand for faster and reliable communication in both 5G and beyond 5G (B5G), mmWave spectrum is being actively investigated to fully accommodate the rapid growth in expected data traffic. Further, the advent of 5G communication has prompted the intensive research for Internet of Things (IoT) devices converged with 5G network, as well. Thus, in order to deploy a successful and reliable next generation services, the improvement in mmWave technologies must occur. Although there is a broad spectrum of research to solve unprecedented challenges in mmWave, antenna technology should be a primary concern as a massive number of antenna elements are required. To overcome the high propagation path loss at mmWave, phased array antenna is leading the main technical stream. Further, since high gain antenna elements can eventually reduce the required number of both antenna elements and mmWave beamforming integrated circuits (ICs) in an array configuration, the overall antenna module or system size, number of required parts, cost, fabrication difficulty and power consumption are effectively reduced. Although the conventional patch antennas are typically used due easy integration with multiple beamforming ICs, the demand for a planar antenna structure with higher gain is increasing to accommodate the aforementioned advantages in high gain antennas. Previously, research for high gain antenna structures has been extensive. Some previously reported antennas adopt cavity or slot-loaded structures to achieve high gain [1,2,3], but the sacrifice of high-profile cavity or impractical geometry make them unsuitable for mmWave applications. Other structures based on periodic or Yagi-like structures, or dielectric resonators were also reported [4,5,6,7], but they still require a large dimension as well as a high profile. Additionally, stacked structures based on planar patch radiators have been proposed [8,9], but the gain enhancement ratio with respect to the increase in overall volume, including the stack height and ground plane size, seems to be less effective. Further, a planar magneto-electric dipole antenna with high directivity was recently reported [10]. However, the required dimension is still large and the precise use of multiple via increases the difficulty in both fabrication and performance tuning. In addition, metasurface, cavity backed, cavity resonance antennas are considered for high gain array antenna [11,12,13], but they require a high profile or a large occupation of extra layers limiting the integration with beamforming ICs. Lastly, complementary dipole and slot array structure, and phased array quasi-Yagi antenna have been proposed [14,15], but the high profile and complicated coupling aperture feed network seems to be the bottleneck.
Thus, to overcome the drawbacks of the previously reported structures, a new design configuration for mmWave high gain structure without using a superstrate configuration is proposed. Further, a practical mmWave antenna should be configured in an array or a sub-array architecture with an integrated feed network. However, when multiple antenna elements are integrated in an array configuration, the amplitude and phase balances among the radiation elements usually become unmatched and differ from each other within an array, requiring a compensation technique. Thus, the proposed single element is extended to a 2 × 2 array structure including the feed network for ensuring the amplitude and phase balances among radiation elements and verified at 28 GHz.
2. Analysis of the Proposed Antenna Array
Microstrip patch antenna is usually preferred due to its simple architecture, low-complex design, ease of fabrication and integration with ICs, and good performance [16,17]. The conventional patch antenna is designed by a half wavelength at its operation frequency as shown by the reference 1 antenna in Figure 1a. Here, 3-D simulation extracted data by CST studio suite software are used to present the plots. The reference 1 antenna operates at f0 denoting a desired target operation frequency. It is known that the maximum achievable gain of antenna theoretically depends on its physical size compared to the wavelength at an operation frequency. However, if the antenna size is simply enlarged to λ1/2 to increase the potential gain, the operation frequency lowers due to the increase in wavelength without a gain enhancement at the center frequency. That is, although the increase in antenna size can increase the potential gain or directivity, the shift in matched frequency is unavoidable due to the change in a wavelength.
As shown in Figure 1a, the reference 1 and 2 of the conventional patches with the center frequencies at f0 and f1, where f0 is the target frequency higher than f1. Reference 2 shows the corresponding patch size to λ1/2 and the maximum potential directivity of 8 dBi at its matched frequency. This directivity is similar to the potential directivity of the reference 1 conventionally designed at the target frequency. Instead of using the reference 1 directly, the reference 2 with a physically larger dimension is used at the target frequency by shifting the matching frequency through H-shape as shown in Figure 1a. Although the frequency shifts up slightly, the maximum gain still remains similar to the gain at lower frequency. Then, additional slot is integrated with a shorting pin to control resonant current that is shown in a green box inside Figure 1a. Since additional field radiated through the slot from the ground conductor is converged with the radiated field from the shorted patch, the maximum achievable directivity is increased by approximately 2 dB within the same dimension. However, the frequency is unmatched even though the maximum gain is achieved at the target frequency. Thus, to match the operation frequency while keeping the maximum directivity, the slot size is adjusted as shown in Figure 1b. Since the variation in slot y dimension has not affected the electrical characteristics significantly, and the slot x dimension is varied with the fixed slot y. However, within the physically available size of the patch, the changes in slot dimension cannot satisfy both the impedance matching and highest directivity simultaneously at the desired frequency. Therefore, to overcome the limitation in the physically enlarged antenna with a simple slot or a shorting pin, a new H-shaped shorted ring configuration with a vertically loaded stack feed is proposed.
Figure 2 shows the proposed H-shaped shorted ring with a pair of vertically loaded conductor stacks along the signal feed and shorting pin. The proposed structure is designed with 4-layers using two substrates and a single prepreg as shown in Figure 2a. The slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin is designed on layer 1 and additional matching stack is inserted into layer 2. The matching stack consists of a pair of rectangular conductors where one is loaded on the signal feed line and the other is connected to the ground. Figure 2b shows the dimension and matching stack parameters.
Depending on the values of Cx and Cy, loaded inductance and capacitance are varied. Since the increase in Cy heavily loads the capacitance on the antenna, Cy value is minimized to the size corresponding to the through-via size. Having the Cy fixed to 0.04 λ0, the effect of variation in Cx value on the antenna impedance is simulated as shown in Figure 3. Starting from the arbitrary chosen value of 0.15 λ0, the increase in Cx shows the additional inductive and capacitive loading that makes the impedance match to the operation frequency by Cx of 0.19 λ0. Here, the λ0 at 28 GHz corresponds about 10.7 mm and the Figure 3 represents the parameter variation according to 0.2 mm in length. Since the typical printed circuit board (PCB) technology where a fabrication resolution of 0.1 mm can be guaranteed, the concern about fabrication sensitivity of the proposed architecture can be negligible.
Further, the effect of variation in Cx value on the achievable directivity is also simulated as shown in Figure 4a. Having the Cx and Cy set to 0.19 λ0 and 0.04 λ0, respectively, it confirms that simultaneous matching for reflection coefficient and maximum directivity were achieved at the target frequency of 28 GHz. Then, radiation pattern of the proposed antenna is simulated and compared with the conventional patch antenna with the same ground size as shown in Figure 4b.
The simulated peak gains of the proposed antenna and the conventional patch are 9.46 dBi and 8.07 dBi, respectively, showing the gain enhancement by 1.39 dB. Also, the half power beamwidth (HPBW) of the proposed antenna shows 67° and 55° in xz and yz planes, respectively, while the simulated radiation efficiency is about 91.34%.
To validate the effective use in a practical array configuration, the proposed antenna structure is extended to the 2 × 2 array as shown in Figure 5a. The same substrates and prepreg materials as described in Figure 2a are used and the four slot-loaded radiation elements with shorting pins are integrated on the top layer. Also, each antenna element is vertically loaded with a pair matching stack as shown in layer 2 while the 1 × 4 feed network is integrated into the layer 3 to excite the four radiation elements with a single RF port. Further, an additional guide-ring of 1.55 λ0 × 1.54 λ0 as a magnetic wall is integrated with the proposed array antenna. Since mmWave antennas are relatively small compared to RF connectors used for measurement, a large ground plane is usually required to fabricate the mmWave antenna sample. However, the large ground plane causes the unnecessary spread of RF currents, resulting in a shift of matching frequency or gain degradation. Further, in the array structure, a phase mismatch in surface current of each radiation element occurs without the guide-ring as shown in Figure 5b. The upper two elements and lower two elements have different current distribution due to the phase mismatch. Thus, by integrating the guide-ring to prevent the RF current from spreading and keeping the surface currents among each element uniformly excited, the antenna gain can be further optimized.
3. Fabrication of the Proposed Antenna and Measured Results
The proposed 2 × 2 array antenna was fabricated with Rogers 5880 substrate with a relative permittivity of 2.2 and loss tangent of 0.0009, and Rogers prepreg RO4450T with a relative permittivity of 3.35 and loss tangent of 0.004 as shown in Figure 6a. Also, an aluminum test jig was assembled with the fabricated antenna array to tightly fix the RF connector for stable measurement.
The fabricated volume of the fabricated antenna was 3.45 λ0 × 3.45 λ0 × 0.17 λ0 at 28 GHz including the whole ground plane size while the guide-ring area occupied about 1.55 λ0 × 1.54 λ0. The simulated and measured 10-dB impedance bandwidth of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna were 1.43% and 2.29%, respectively. Here, the measured bandwidth was slightly increased possibly due to the effect of the test jig required for fixing the RF connector firmly. Having the proper fixture is critical in mmWave antenna measurement since it provides consistent measured results. Thus, the measured result is reasonable in comparison with the simulated result. Finally, the simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 28 GHz are shown in Figure 7a,b. The simulated and measured peak gains were 13.2 dBi and 12.5 dBi, respectively, including the 1 × 4 feed loss. We noted that the decreased gain is suspected due to the antenna test jig. This result also implies that the increased bandwidth is the result of more loss added to the return loss. Further, the measured HPBWs in xz and yz planes of the proposed antenna were about 34° and 31°, respectively, while the simulated HPBWs were about 36° and 37°, respectively. The measured minimum cross-polarization discrimination (XPD) level showed more than 15.5 dB. Therefore, the feasibility of the proposed mmWave antenna structure was verified by the good agreement between the simulated and measured results at 28 GHz. Lastly, the performance comparison with the other antenna topologies is summarized in Table 1.
4. Conclusions
Owing to the increased number of antenna elements to support advanced beamforming technology or next generation massive MIMO communication, effective antenna structure with a high directivity that potentially lowers the mmWave RF system burden must be required. Thus, a new antenna structure satisfying both enhanced gain and matched operation frequency simultaneously has been proposed in this communication. The antenna was configured by a planar slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin where a signal feed line was vertically loaded with a matching stack. The proposed antenna was analyzed in both single and 2 × 2 array configurations and verified at 28 GHz. Further, the feed network based on T-junction with guide-ring was integrated within the array configuration to maximize the array gain. Finally, the measured result showed the high directivity of 12.5 dBi including the loss by array feed network.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.K.; investigation and validation, Y.-B.K.; writing—review and editing, and supervision, H.L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) and Chung-Ang University.
Acknowledgments
This research was partly supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2019R1A2C1088314), Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2017-0-00795, A Study on a Small Antenna System for Vehicle Supporting Wide Elevation Angle) and Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2019.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, N.; Bai, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, X. Cavity-Backed Circularly Polarized Self-Phased Four-Loop Antenna for Gain Enhancement. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayderkhani, R.; Forooraghi, K.; Abbasi-Arand, B. Gain-Enhanced SIW Cavity-Backed Slot Antenna with Arbitrary Levels of Inclined Polarization. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 931–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, J.; Jiang, X.; Peng, L. Ultrawideband and High-Gain Circularly Polarized Antenna with Double-Y-Shape Slot. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 1508–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Zhang, B.; Liu, A.; Yu, T.; Guo, D.; Wei, Y. Broadband High-Gain Periodic Endfire Antenna by Using I-Shaped Resonator (ISR) Structures. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 1470–1473. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Wei, M.; Gong, S. A Novel Slot Yagi-Like Multilayered Antenna with High Gain and Large Bandwidth. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 790–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Liu, S.-F.; Chen, L.; Li, W.-T.; Shi, X.-W. Gain Enhancement for Broadband Vertical Planar Printed Antenna With H-Shaped Resonator Structures. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 62, 4411–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, I.; Jamaluddin, M.H.; Gaya, A.; Rahim, H.A. A Dielectric Resonator Antenna with Enhanced Gain and Bandwidth for 5G Applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sarin, V.P.; Nishamol, M.S.; Tony, D.; Aanandan, C.K.; Mohanan, P.; Vasudevan, K. A Wideband Stacked Offset Microstrip Antenna with Improved Gain and Low Cross Polarization. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 59, 1376–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.Y.; Duan, W.; Pan, Y.-M. High-Gain Filtering Patch Antenna Without Extra Circuit. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 63, 5883–5888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.; Liu, J. Investigation of a Via-Loaded Microstrip Magnetic Dipole Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth and Gain. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 4836–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Hu, X. An Optically Transparent Metasurface-Based Resonant Cavity Fed by Patch Antenna for Improved Gain. Materials 2019, 12, 3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Losito, O.; Portosi, V.; Venanzoni, G.; Bigelli, F.; Mencarelli, D.; Scalmati, P.; Renghini, C.; Carta, P.; Prudenzano, F. Feasibility Investigation of SIW Cavity-Backed Patch Antenna Array for Ku Band Applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goudarzi, A.; Honari, M.M.; Mirzavand, R. Resonant Cavity Antennas for 5G Communication Systems: A Review. Electronics 2020, 9, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- So, K.K.; Luk, K.M.; Chan, C.H.; Chan, K.F. 3D Printed High Gain Complementary Dipole/Slot Antenna Array. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parchin, N.O.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Basherlou, H.J.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; Rodriguez, J.; Limiti, E. MM-Wave Phased Array Quasi-Yagi Antenna for the Upcoming 5G Cellular Communications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, G.; Ray, K.P. Broadband Microstrip Antennas; Artech House: Boston, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Garg, R.; Bhartia, P.; Ittipiboon, A. Microstrip Antenna Design Handbook; Artech House: Boston, MA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Reflection coefficient and directivity behaviors for (a) different types of planar patches and (b) a proposed slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin.
Figure 1.
Reflection coefficient and directivity behaviors for (a) different types of planar patches and (b) a proposed slot-loaded patch with a shorting pin.
Figure 2.
Proposed antenna structure with (a) multi-layer information and (b) layer 1 and layer 2.
Figure 3.
Proposed antenna structure with impedance variation according to Cx value.
Figure 4.
Simulated results for (a) reflection coefficient and maximum directivity according to Cx values, and (b) radiation patterns of the proposed and conventional patch antennas.
Figure 4.
Simulated results for (a) reflection coefficient and maximum directivity according to Cx values, and (b) radiation patterns of the proposed and conventional patch antennas.
Figure 5.
Proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (a) multi-layer view and (b) surface current on array elements synchronization by a guide-ring.
Figure 5.
Proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (a) multi-layer view and (b) surface current on array elements synchronization by a guide-ring.
Figure 6.
Implementation of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (a) fabrication photo and (b) simulated and measured reflection coefficients.
Figure 6.
Implementation of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna with (a) fabrication photo and (b) simulated and measured reflection coefficients.
Figure 7.
Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna in (a) xz-plane and (b) yz-plane at 28 GHz.
Figure 7.
Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna in (a) xz-plane and (b) yz-plane at 28 GHz.
Table 1.
Comparison of the proposed antenna performance with the other antenna topologies.
| Reference | Polarization | Topology | Cent. Freq. (GHz) | BW (%) | Gain (dBi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [2] | Linear (slant) | Cavity-backed | 10.1 | 1.0 | 6.9 |
| [3] | Circular | Slot | 5.2 | 49.8 | 8.5 |
| [4] | Linear | I-Shaped resonator | 7.8 | 47.7 | 9.5 |
| [5] | Linear | Slot | 4.2 | 27.8 | 12.2 |
| [6] | Linear | H-shaped resonator | 3 | 51.9 | 9.7 |
| [7] | Linear | Dielectric resonator | 15 | 16.1 | 10.4 |
| [8] | Linear | Stacked | 5.73 | 34.9 | 8.07 |
| [9] | Linear | Slot + stacked | 2.4 | 19.6 | 9.7 |
| [10] | Linear | Via-loaded | 10.3 | 9.1 | 10.2 |
| [11] | Linear | Metasurface | 5.6 | 2.5 | 12.2 |
| [12] | Linear | Cavity-backed | 11.7 | 21.4 | 10.0 * |
| [15] | Linear | Qausi-yagi | 26 | 7.7 | 8.31 ** |
| This work | Linear | Shorted ring + slot | 28 | 2.3 | 12.5 |
* Measured gain for 2 × 2 array with feed loss; ** Simulated gain for 2 × 2 array without feed loss.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, Y.-B.; Lee, H.L. mmWave High Gain Planar H-Shaped Shorted Ring Antenna Array. Sensors 2020, 20, 5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185168
AMA Style
Kim Y-J, Kim Y-B, Lee HL. mmWave High Gain Planar H-Shaped Shorted Ring Antenna Array. Sensors. 2020; 20(18):5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185168
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Young-Jun, Ye-Bon Kim, and Han Lim Lee. 2020. "mmWave High Gain Planar H-Shaped Shorted Ring Antenna Array" Sensors 20, no. 18: 5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185168
APA StyleKim, Y.-J., Kim, Y.-B., & Lee, H. L. (2020). mmWave High Gain Planar H-Shaped Shorted Ring Antenna Array. Sensors, 20(18), 5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185168
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.