[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Appropriate Scaling of Networks and Images for Convolutional Neural Network-Based Nerve Detection in Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks
Previous Article in Journal
Localization Performance Analysis and Algorithm Design of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted D2D Systems
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 24
Issue 11
10.3390/s24113695
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Flexible Ammonia Gas Sensor Based on a Grafted Polyaniline Grown on a Polyethylene Terephthalate Film

by
Masanobu Matsuguchi
1,*,
Kaito Horio
1,
Atsuya Uchida
1,
Rui Kakunaka
1 and
Shunsuke Shiba
2
1
Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Bunkyo-cho 3, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan
2
Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, NiSiNa Materials Co., Ltd., 2-6-20-3, Kitagata, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0803, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(11), 3695; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113695
Submission received: 22 May 2024 / Revised: 4 June 2024 / Accepted: 5 June 2024 / Published: 6 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano/Micro-Structured Materials for Gas Sensor)
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Illustrations of (<b>a</b>) graft polymer conformations, (<b>b</b>) grafted PANI chains, and (<b>c</b>) the diffusion of ammonia molecules within the PANI graft chains.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Three-layered structure of the flexible polyaniline graft film sensor.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Illustration of PANI graft film sensor preparation: (<b>a</b>) polyaniline graft film; (<b>b</b>) sensor structure.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>SEM images of the surfaces of (<b>a</b>) PET film, (<b>b</b>) PD-coated PET film, (<b>c</b>) PANI grafted on PET film, and (<b>d</b>) cross-section of PANI grafted film.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>The characteristics of the PANI graft film sensor: (<b>a</b>) response–recovery curves to 250 ppm of NH<sub>3</sub> measured at 30 °C and 50 °C, (<b>b</b>) response–recovery curve to 50–250 ppm NH<sub>3</sub> at 50 °C, (<b>c</b>) calibration curve measured at 50 °C, and (<b>d</b>) comparison of response–recovery curves of sensors with different PANI forms.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Illustration showing how the sensor is bent into shape.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Effects of the bending angle on the response recovery curves of the PANI grafted film sensor to 250 ppm NH<sub>3</sub> at 50 °C: (<b>a</b>) sensor bent 60° outward; (<b>b</b>) sensor bent 60° inward.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel NH3 gas sensor is introduced, employing polyaniline (PANI) with a unique structure called a graft film. The preparation method was simple: polydopamine (PD) was coated on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film and PANI graft chains were grown on its surface. This distinctive three-layer sensor showed a response value of 12 for 50 ppm NH3 in a dry atmosphere at 50 °C. This value surpasses those of previously reported sensors using structurally controlled PANI films. Additionally, it is on par with sensors that combine PANI with metal oxide semiconductors or carbon materials, the high sensitivity of which have been reported. To confirm our film’s potential as a flexible sensor, the effect of bending on the its characteristics was investigated. This revealed that although bending decreased the response value, it had no effect on the response time or recovery. This indicated that the sensor film itself was not broken by bending and had sufficient mechanical strength.

1. Introduction

Ammonia (NH3) gas, a common air pollutant, is expected to be an important energy source in the coming hydrogen-fueled society [1,2,3,4]. In such applications, NH3 gas needs to be monitored for leak detection due to its toxicity and its adverse effects on the environment. In addition, NH3 gas is known to be a medical biomarker for kidney disorders and stomach infections induced by Helicobacter pylori [5]. Therefore, ammonia gas at sub-ppm levels is of great importance for medical diagnosis [6,7,8,9]. For these purposes, there is a need to develop a simple, low-cost NH3 gas sensor that does not require heating. Since it functions at room temperature, the sensor allows battery operation even in places without electrical outlets. In addition to these characteristics, in recent years, demand has grown for flexible sensor elements, which enable the sensors to be attached to clothing or complex surfaces. Such elements will further expand the application range of gas sensors generally [9,10,11,12].
Polyaniline (PANI) has the potential to meet those requirements and has long been studied as an ammonia-gas-sensing material due to its unique doping/dedoping chemistry and good environmental stability [13,14,15]. In addition, PANI is a stable electrical conductor at room temperature, which is advantageous for reducing sensor power consumption and improving portability. PANI can be synthesized easily via the chemical oxidative polymerization of aniline hydrochloride. However, sensors made by directly casting the resulting insoluble PANI dispersion onto a sensor substrate have not demonstrated sensing characteristics sufficient for practical use. This is because the formed film possesses a granular structure in where PANI chains are aggregated, resulting in poor gas diffusivity [16]. Forming a thin film is an effective way to reduce the sensor response time by reducing the diffusion depth. Similar to other conducting polymers, PANI thin films can be prepared via electrochemical polymerization and used in gas-sensing applications. Korent et al. electrochemically deposited PANI via cyclic voltammetry on screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) prepared via Au sputtering. The fabricated sensor showed excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and sensitivity [17]. However, this electrochemical polymerization method is problematic. For example, the sensor substrate is limited to electrically conductive materials and requires various special apparatuses, such as electrodes, electrochemical cells, and potentiostats/galvanostats. In addition, it is difficult to make a film with a large surface area, which makes it unsuitable for mass production.
Conventionally, many reports have addressed the complexation of PANI with nanomaterials, such as metal oxides and carbon materials, to improve sensitivity [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Meanwhile, it has been widely reported that gas-sensing properties can be improved through the development of structure-controlled PANI films with large surface areas, such as nanofibers [15,25], nanotubes [26,27,28,29], and networks [30], which facilitate good gas diffusivity. Sensor properties can also be enhanced by the formation of core–shell-type spherical particles [31] and hollow spherical particles with PANI on the surface layer [32,33]. In those reports, the spherical particles were in the sub-micrometer range. In contrast, we reported that it was possible to detect 46 ppb of NH3 gas by forming particles in the micrometer range [34].
In this paper, we propose a sensor using PANI with a unique structure called a graft film to improve NH3 gas-sensing properties. As discussed in detail later, the possible advantages of the graft structure are that small gas molecules can more easily diffuse between polyaniline chains, thereby increasing the opportunities for interaction between those molecules and individual polymer chains, resulting in improved sensing characteristics. In addition, the polyaniline chains are fixed to the substrate, which is expected to give the film excellent mechanical and long-term stability. However, there are very few reports on the use of polyaniline graft film as a gas-sensing film. This is because there are limited ways to chemically bond polyaniline to the sensor substrate and because the types of sensor substrates are limited. Sutar et al. reported the modification of silicone substrate surfaces with a self-assembled amino-silane monolayer; the amino groups served as reaction initiation sites for the chemical polymerization of polyaniline [35]. We propose a new, facile method for fabricating PANI graft film gas sensors that can be adapted to any type of substrate material. We then discuss the prepared PANI graft films and their NH3 gas-sensing characteristics.

2. PANI Graft Polymers

A grafted polymer is defined as an assembly of polymer chains tethered to the surface by the end of each chain. The structure usually depends on the grafting density, as shown in Figure 1a [36]. When the density is low and the interaction between the polymer chains is minimal, the conformation of the polymer chains contracts, forming a mushroom-shaped structure. On the other hand, the high density allows for interaction between the polymer chains, forcing them to stretch away from the substrate surface. This is called a “polymer brush” structure. We expect PANI to adopt this structure even at lower grafting densities due to its linear and rigid backbone structure and the strong π-π interactions between them (Figure 1b). The low-density brush structure is expected to promote gas diffusion between the polyaniline chains, as shown in Figure 1c.
As mentioned above, the preparation of polyaniline graft polymer requires primary amino groups on the surface as reaction-initiating groups. However, since it is impossible to react the aniline monomer with a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film directly, we proposed a sensor with the three-layered structure shown in Figure 2. This sensor comprises the PET film, a polydopamine (PD) thin film firmly adhered to its surface, and the PANI graft film grown on the PD surface through surface-initiated polymerization. In particular, PD plays an important role in PANI graft film preparation. One of the key properties of PD is its strong adhesion to virtually any shape and size of organic or inorganic material via a simple dip-coating process [37,38]. In addition, the PD structure includes many functional groups, such as amine, imine, and catechol. These functional groups can be used to modify the surface in a variety of ways. With regard to PANI, although it was used for biomedical purposes rather than gas sensors, there is a report dealing the coating of magnetic nanoparticles with PD and the growth of high-density PANI brushes on the surface [39].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

PET film (Teijin G2, 38 µm) was used as the sensor substrate. After ultrasonic cleaning in ethanol before use, the film was irradiated with UV light (UV Ozone Cleaner, UV-253E, Filgen, Nagoya, Japan) for 30 min to make the surface hydrophilic. Figure S1 shows the results of the contact angle measurements of the PET films before and after UV irradiation. Before irradiation, the contact angle with water was 81.6°, which was quite hydrophobic, but after irradiation, it was 34.2°, clearly indicating that the surface had become hydrophilic. Dopamine hydrochloride (95%) and p-phenylenediamine (97%) were purchased from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan and used to introduce polymerization-initiating NH2 groups onto the PET substrate surface. Aniline (ANI, 99%) as a monomer, ammonium persulfate (APS, 98%) as an oxidizing agent, and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 35~37.9%) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, %) as dopants were purchased from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan and used to grow PANI chains.

3.2. Preparation of PANI Grafted on PET Film

The preparation of the grafted PANI on the PET film involved in three steps, as shown in Figure 3a. First, a PD layer was deposited onto the PET film via the self-polymerization of the dopamine monomer under alkaline conditions (pH = 8.5). Under alkaline conditions, catechol was converted into a quinone, which can react with nucleophiles such as amines to form covalent bonds [37]. Thus, in the second process, the film was immersed in p-phenylenediamine solution at pH = 8.5. This process enabled the modification of the PD surface with p-phenylenediamine to increase the number of surface amino groups, serving as the initiation points for subsequent surface-initiated polymerization. Third, the oxidative graft polymerization of the aniline monomer was performed according to the literature [39]. PANI chains were grown on the PD surface by immersing the surface-modified PET substrate with amino groups in a solution containing aniline monomer and hydrochloric acid. This was followed by the addition of an aqueous APS solution and stirring at 30 °C for 24 h. Deposited PANI that was not grafted onto the PET film was dedoped once and thoroughly washed with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). This was because dedoped PANI dissolves in NMP, whereas chemically bonded graft PANI does not. The PANI-grafted PET film was then immersed in 1 M sulfuric acid for 2 h and redoped with sulfuric acid, followed by washing with acetone and drying under reduced pressure at room temperature. Finally, the sensor was fabricated via the vacuum deposition of interdigitated gold electrodes on the PANI graft film, as shown in Figure 3b.
The above procedures may seem very complicated, but in reality, they simply involve the repeated immersion of the substrate in the reaction solution and washing. A feature of this method is that the graft film can be produced via such a simple operation.

3.3. Characterization of PANI Graft Film

The surface and cross-sectional morphologies of the prepared films were characterized via field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-500, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, MultiMode VS-HT905SPM, Veeco Japan, Yokahama, Japan). The samples for AFM and SEM observation were prepared in the same way as the sensor. However, the sample for cross-sectional SEM observation was prepared by growing PANI graft film on a gold film sputtered on a hard silicon substrate, because cutting the flexible PET film would result in the crushed cross-section that could not be observed. The contact angle of the water droplet was measured using a contact angle meter (LSE-ME2, Nick, Kawaguchi, Japan). The water droplet volume was 1.0 µL.

3.4. NH3 Gas-Sensing Measurement

A pair of interdigitated gold electrodes was vacuum-deposited on the surface of the polyaniline graft film to prepare the sensor element, as shown in Figure 3b. Each sensor was positioned in a vessel at 30 °C or 50 °C, and dry N2, followed by NH3 gas at different concentrations diluted with dry N2, was introduced into it. The experimental setup is shown in Figure S2. The current was measured using an electrometer under an applied DC voltage of 1 V. An example of the sensor response to NH3 gas is shown in Figure S3 to illustrate the sensor characteristics. After steady resistance was obtained in a dry N2 atmosphere, 250 ppm of NH3 gas was introduced into the measurement vessel. At this time, the resistance value just before the introduction of NH3 gas was defined as R0. The time dependence of the resistance was then recorded while the sensor was exposed to NH3 gas for 30 min. The resistance increased as the sensor was exposed to NH3 gas, and the resistance after 30 min was defined as RNH3. This figure also shows the recovery curve of the response. After the sensor was exposed to NH3 gas, the atmosphere was changed back to dry N2, resulting in the recovery of the resistance to the original value. The response value S was calculated to be S = ΔRNH3/R0, where ΔRNH3 = RNH3 − R0. The response time t80 represented the time required to reach 80% of the total resistance change ΔRNH3, and the recovery rate Re was calculated as the percentage of the resistance change ΔRN2 after returning to nitrogen for 30 min of the total resistance change ΔRNH3.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Morphological Characterization of the PANI Graft Film

To confirm whether the PANI graft film had grown on the PET substrate, FT-IR measurements were first performed. However, since the coverage of the PANI graft film was relatively low, the presence of the film could not be confirmed due to the strong absorption of the PET substrate. Therefore, surface and cross-sectional SEM observations were performed to investigate the growth process and morphology of the PANI graft film, and the images are shown in Figure 4. The PET substrate surface was flat, but after PD coating, roughness became visible. In addition, after the polymerization of PANI, larger irregularities spread in a patchy manner, suggesting that polyaniline graft chains grow over the substrate starting from the unevenly coated PD. The cross-sectional SEM observation is shown in Figure 4d. It should be noted here that, as mentioned in the Experimental section, the PANI graft film for the cross-sectional observation was developed on the PD-coated gold film sputtered on the silicon substrate. The image shows that the sputtered gold layer and the PD layer on the silicon substrate have a combined thickness of about 100 nm, with a PANI layer with an about 50 nm thickness growing on them unevenly. This result is consistent with the surface SEM results and AFM images shown in Figure S4. From this result, assuming that the PANI chains extend vertically and the length of the aniline monomer is 0.4155 nm [40], the degree of polymerization of PANI is calculated to be approximately 120.

4.2. Ammonia Gas-Sensing Response

Figure 5a displays the measurement results of the ammonia gas-sensing characteristics of the PANI graft film sensor at 30 °C and 50 °C. It was confirmed that the sensor responded reversibly at both temperatures and was operable at room temperature. This reversible response of PANI to NH3 is explained by a known sensing mechanism [30]. The response value S was 32 at 30 °C and 35 at 50 °C. In addition, the recovery rate Re was 89% at 30 °C and 90% at 50 °C, while the response time t80 was 7 min at 30 °C and 11 min at 50 °C, indicating that the effect of temperature on the sensor characteristics is minimal around room temperature.
A typical response of the PANI graft film sensor exposed to different concentrations of NH3 gas is shown in Figure 5b, and a reproducible sensor response was observed. As shown in Figure 5c, the sensor also exhibited a linear relationship between the response values and the concentration of NH3 in the range of 50 ppm to 250 ppm. Although our measurement equipment was unable to measure sensor responses below 50 ppm, a satisfactory response of S = 12 was obtained at 50 ppm, indicating that ammonia gas can be detected below 50 ppm.
The NH3 gas-sensing properties of sensors constructed from four different structure-controlled polyaniline films prepared in our laboratory are illustrated in Figure 5d, with the obtained sensor properties summarized and compared in Table 1. The four structure-controlled PANI films are (1) the PANI graft film in this study, (2) a PANI nanofiber film prepared using our unique on-substrate method [41], (3) a film consisting of core–shell-type spherical particles prepared via coating 4.5 µm diameter polystyrene spherical particles with a PANI shell layer [34], and (4) a film coated with a dispersion solution of granular PANIs prepared via conventional oxidative polymerization. Although the preparation conditions and measurement conditions of each sensor differ slightly, the use of structure-controlled PANI films has been shown to improve the sensor response compared with the conventional granular PANI film. The sensor based on PANI-coated polystyrene microspheres showed the highest sensitivity among the structure-controlled PANI film sensors for reasons already discussed [34]. The sensor using the present PANI graft film showed the second-largest gas response. This might be because, as expected, the grafted chain structure promotes gas diffusion between the polyaniline chains, as illustrated in Figure 1c. However, the response time and recovery rate need to further improve for practical use. In the future, it will be necessary to control the graft density and graft chain length (degree of polymerization), as well as select the optimal dopant species. Table 2 compares the response of our PANI-grafted film sensor with that of previously reported high-sensitivity polyaniline ammonia gas sensors operating at room temperature. It should be noted that some of the response values S in Table 2 have been recalculated to conform to our definition S = ΔRNH3/R0. Because the measured temperature, concentration, and humidity differ from report to report, it is difficult to make a simple comparison. In particular, it can be seen that many studies measure response characteristics under humidified conditions. It has been reported that response values are higher under humid conditions than under dry conditions [28,33,42]. Considering that our measurements were performed under dry conditions, we observed that among the reports involving sensors with structures controlled solely by PANI, our PANI graft film sensor exhibits very high response values. Furthermore, even when compared to composites of PANI with other materials, a comparable response value was obtained.
Selectivity to other gases is an important property of gas sensors, but it was not investigated in this study. However, many reports have found that sensors using PANI exhibit excellent gas selectivity to NH3 gas [11,18,26,30,33]. The sensor fabricated in the present research also differs only in the form of PANI, so we believe that there is essentially no problem with selectivity.

4.3. Mechanical Stability of PANI Graft Film Sensor

When considering the practical use of PANI graft film as a flexible sensor, it is necessary to investigate the effect of bending on the sensor characteristics [18,21]. In this study, as shown schematically in Figure 6, the bending angle of the sensor in the flat state was 0°. When bending 60° with the sensing surface (PANI graft film) inward, it was denoted as +60°, whereas the bending angle of 60° with the sensing surface outward was defined as −60°. The effects of these two bending angles on the sensor characteristics were measured. Figure 7 illustrates the magnitudes of the sensor response S when the sensor was bent in the −60° and +60° directions. Note that the vertical axis of the graph is a value normalized by setting the S value before the same sensor to be bent, i.e., at 0°, to 100%. The results showed that when the substrate was bent outward (−60°), the response value decreased to about 74%. On the other hand, when the sensor was bent inward (+60°), the rate of decrease was suppressed to about 10%. Thus, outward bending has a greater effect on the response than inward bending. To consider the reason for the decrease in response when the sensor was bent, the other sensor characteristics obtained are summarized in Table 3. In this table, the sensor tested when bent outward is called Sensor 1, and the sensor tested when bent inward is called Sensor 2. The measurement results showed that the sensor response value decreased due to bending, but the response time and recovery rate were not affected. This result indicates that bending did not damage the sensor. In fact, previous reports have clearly shown that the bending of flexible PANI sensors does not cause significant damage to the PANI itself [18,21]. On the other hand, an increase in the electrical resistance R0 of the sensor was observed regardless of its bending direction. This suggests that the cause of the decrease in response is the fact that bending reduces the contact between the electrode and the sensing surface. As shown in Figure 3b, the structure of this sensor has interdigitated gold electrodes placed on top of the PANI graft film. This structure was selected for two reasons. One reason is the insulating nature of the PD-coated PET surface and the growth of PANI on the layer: there was a concern that if the electrodes were placed on the PET surface, it would be impossible to make electrical contact with the PANI. The other reason is that we were concerned that the electrodes on the PET surface would be eroded by the immersion of the PET film in the reaction solution. However, due to this electrode structure, there was inadequate adhesion between the PANI graft film and the electrode. When the sensor was bent, the contact deteriorated, likely leading to an increase in the electrical resistance value R0 and a decrease in the response value. However, it is not clear at this time why the decrease in the response value was greater when the sensor was bent inward. Thus, the optimal placement of the electrodes will need to be considered in the future.

5. Conclusions

We fabricated an ammonia gas sensor using PANI, featuring a unique structure called graft film, as a sensing film. The fabrication method involved initially coating the sensor substrate with PD, then introducing surface NH2 groups using p-phenylenediamine, and finally conducting oxidative polymerization of an aniline monomer using these NH2 groups as initiation points. This method, which we developed, offer the advantage of being easy to fabricate and allows for the preparation of PANI graft films on any substrate. In this study, we used flexible PET film as the substrate. Compared to other structurally controlled PANI films and PANI composite films, the graft film sensor exhibited a significant response value of S = 12 at 50 ppm at 50 °C. We believe that this is explained by the unique structure of the grafted chains creating spaces between the PANI chains, making it easier for NH3 molecules to diffuse. Though the response time and recovery rate still need to be improved, we believe that these problems will be solved in the future by controlling the graft density and selecting the optimal dopant species. This study is the first step in a unique attempt to develop an ammonia gas sensor using the PANI graft film as NH3 gas-sensing agent, with properties such as gas selectivity and long-term stability still under investigation from a practical point of view. However, in this study, we were able to demonstrate the usefulness of grafted PANI as an NH3 gas-sensing film for operation at room temperature.
In addition, by selecting the PET film as the sensor substrate, we investigated the possibility of using it as a flexible sensor. The results confirmed that the response value decreased when the sensor was bent. This is attributed to poor contact between the PANI graft film and the electrodes, so we would like to improve the sensor structure, including the location of the electrodes, in the future. However, since bending did not affect the response time or recovery rate, we believe that there was no destruction of the sensor membrane structure itself. The graft film fabrication technology presented here is suitable for the fabrication of other flexible sensors because polydopamine can adhere to any material surface, serving as a starting point for covalent modification with desired molecules. In addition, the polymer chains are fixed to the substrate, and excellent mechanical strength is expected even when the film is bent or stretched.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s24113695/s1. Figure S1: Contact angle measurement of the PET film (a) before UV irradiation and (b) after UV irradiation; Figure S2: Illustration of the experimental setup; Figure S3: An example of sensor response to NH3 gas; Figure S4: AFM images of the PANI grafted on the PET film.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and data curation, M.M.; validation, formal analysis and investigation, M.M., K.H., A.U., R.K. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI, grant Number JP 21K04690.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Film characterization was carried out on a FE-SEM and an AFM at the Research and Educational Center of Materials Engineering, Course of Materials Design Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ehime University.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Shunsuke Shiba is employed by the company Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, NiSiNa materials Co., Ltd. All the authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klerke, A.; Christensen, C.H.; Norskov, J.K.; Vegge, T. Ammonia for hydrogen storage: Challenges and opportunities. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 2304–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Itoh, N.; Oshima, A.; Suga, E.; Sato, T. Kinetic enhancement of ammonia decomposition as a chemical hydrogen carrier in palladium membrane reactor. Catal. Today 2014, 236, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, T.; Miyaoka, H.; Miyaoka, H.; Ichikawa, T.; Kojima, Y. Review on ammonia absorption materials: Metal hydrides, halides, and borohydrides. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Matsunaga, T.; Matsumoto, S.; Tasaki, R.; Ogura, Y.; Eboshi, T.; Takeishi, Y.; Honda, K.; Sato, K.; Nagaoka, K. Oxidation of Ru/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2-X at ambient temperature as a trigger for carbon-free H2 production by ammonia oxidative decomposition. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 13369–13376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Krishnan, S.T.; Devadhasan, J.P.; Kim, S. Recent analytical approaches to detect exhaled breath ammonia with special reference to renal patients. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hibbard, T.; Crowley, K.; Kelly, F.; Ward, F.; Holian, J.; Watson, A.; Killard, A.J. Point of care monitoring of hemodialysis patients with a breath ammonia measurement device based on printed polyaniline nanoparticle sensors. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 12158–12165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Natale, C.D.; Paolesse, R.; Martinelli, E.; Capuano, R. Solid-state gas sensors for breath analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 824, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Righettoni, M.; Amann, A.; Pratsinis, S.E. Breath analysis by nanostructured metal oxides as chemo-resistive gas sensors. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.-Y.; Lee, C.-S.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.-H. Flexible room-temperature NH3 sensor for ultrasensitive, selective, and humidity-independent gas detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27858–27867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ma, J.; Fan, H.; Li, Z.; Jia, Y.; Yadav, A.K.; Dong, G.; Wang, W.; Dong, W.; Wang, S. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline on the ethylenediamine modified polyethylene terephthalate fibers for a flexible room temperature ammonia gas sensor with high responses. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 334, 129677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, L.; Xu, X.; Liu, M.; Chen, C.; Cui, J.; Chen, X.; Wu, K.; Sun, D. Wearable and flexible bacterial cellulose/polyaniline ammonia sensor based on a synergistic doping strategy. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 334, 129647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lv, D.; Shen, W.; Chen, W.; Tan, R.; Xu, L.; Song, W. PSS-PANI/PVDF composite based flexible NH3 sensors with sub-ppm detection at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 328, 129085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kukla, A.L.; Shirshov, Y.M.; Piletsky, S.A. Ammonia sensors based on sensitive polyaniline films. Sens. Actuators B 1996, 37, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dhawan, S.K.; Kumar, D.; Ram, M.K.; Chandra, S.; Trivedi, D.C. Application of conducting polyaniline as sensor material for ammonia. Sens. Actuators B 1997, 40, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, J.; Virji, S.; Weiller, B.H.; Kaner, R.B. Nanostrutured polyaniline sensors. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1314–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Matsuguchi, M.; Io, J.; Sugiyama, G.; Sakai, Y. Effect of NH3 gas on electrical conductivity of polyaniline blend films. Synth. Met. 2002, 128, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Korent, A.; Soderznik, K.Z.; Sturm, S.; Rozman, K.Z.; Redon, N.; Wojkiewicz, J.L.; Duc, D. Facile fabrication of an ammonia-gas sensor using electrochemically synthesized polyaniline on commercial screen-printed three-electrode systems. Sensors 2021, 21, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wen, X.; Cai, Y.; Nie, X.; Xiong, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, H.; Li, Z.; Shen, Y.; Li, C. PSS-doped PANI nanoparticle/Ti3C2TX composites for conductometric flexible ammonia gas sensors operated at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2023, 374, 132788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, Q.; Zhang, H.; Shi, Y.; Yu, X.; Lan, G. Preparation and gas sensing properties of PANI/SnO2 hybrid material. Polymers 2021, 13, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, A.; Liu, B.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Yun, Y. Interface Design of SnO2@PANI Nanotube with enhanced sensing performance for ammonia detection at room temperature. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Duan, Z.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S.; Yuan, Z.; Tai, H. Ultrasensitive flexible NH3 gas sensor based on polyaniline/SrGe4O9 nanocomposite with ppt-level detection ability at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 319, 128293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fan, G.; Chen, D.; Li, T.; Yi, S.; Ji, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Shao, G.; Fan, B.; Wang, H.; et al. Enhanced room-temperature ammonia-sensing properties of polyaniline-modified WO3 nanoplates derived via ultrasonic spray process. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 312, 127892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, S.; Diao, Y.; Yang, Z.; He, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, F.; Lu, H.; Yan, X.; Sun, P.; et al. Enhanced room temperature gas sensor based on Au-loaded mesoporous In2O3 nanospheres@polyaniline core-shell nanohybrid assembled on flexible PET substrate for NH3 detection. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 276, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, C.; Tai, H.; Zhang, P.; Yuan, Z.; Du, X.; Xie, G. A high-performance flexible gas sensor based on self-assembled PANI-CeO2 nanocomposite thin film for trace-level NH3 detection at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 261, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Merian, T.; Redon, N.; Zujovic, Z.; Stanisaljev, D.; Wojkiewicz, J.L.; Gizdavic-Nikolaidis, M. Ultra sensitive ammonia sensors based on microwave synthesized nanofibrillar polyanilines. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 203, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Duan, X.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Li, X.; Zhao, Q.; Yuan, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Tai, H. Enhanced NH3 sensing performance of polyaniline via a facile morphology modification strategy. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 369, 132302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, C.; Gao, L.; Zhou, F.; Duan, G. Facile synthesis of polyaniline nanotubes using self-assembly method based on the hydrogen bonding: Mechanism and application in gas sensing. Polymers 2017, 9, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Eising, M.; Cava, C.E.; Salvatierra, R.V.; Zarbin, A.J.G.; Roman, L.S. Doping effect on self-assembled films of polyaniline and carbon nanotube applied as ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 245, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Gong, J.; He, G.; Deng, Y. Synthesis of polyaniline nanotubes using Mn2O2 nanofibers as oxidant and their ammonia sensing properties. Synth. Metals 2011, 161, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, L.; Yang, L.; Wu, S.; Wei, F.; Hu, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L. Three-dimensional conductive organic sulfonic acid co-doped bacterial cellulose/polyaniline nanocomposite films for detection of ammonia at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 323, 128689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wojkiewicz, J.L.; Bliznyuk, V.N.; Carquigny, S.; Elkamchi, N.; Redon, N.; Lasri, T.; Pud, A.A.; Reynaud, S. Nanostructured polyaniline-based composite for ppb range ammonia sensing. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 160, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Chang, J.; Wan, P.; Huang, J.; Feng, L. Design and preparation of hollow NiO sphere-polyaniline composite for NH3 gas sensing at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 344, 130179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, S.; Wang, T.; Yang, Z.; He, J.; Wang, J.; Zhao, L.; Lu, H.; Tian, T.; Liu, F.; Sun, P.; et al. Room temperature high performance NH3 sensor based on GO-rambutan-like polyaniline hollow nanosphere hybrid assembled to flexible PET substrate. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 273, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Matsuguchi, M.; Nakamae, T.; Fujisada, R.; Shiba, S. A highly sensitive ammonia gas sensor using micrometer-sized core-shell-type spherical polyaniline particles. Sensors 2021, 21, 7522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sutar, D.S.; Padma, N.; Aswal, D.K.; Deshpande, S.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Yakhmi, J.V. Preparation of nanofibrous polyaniline films and their application as ammonia gas sensor. Sens Actuators B 2007, 128, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zoppe, J.O.; Ataman, N.C.; Mocny, P.; Wang, J.; Moraes, J.; Klok, H.-A. Surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization: State-of-the-art, opportunities, and challenges in surface and interface engineering with polymer brushes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1105–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ryu, J.H.; Messersmith, P.B.; Lee, H. Polydopamine surface chemistry: A decade of discovery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7523–7540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Ai, K.; Lu, L. Polydopamine and its derivative materials: Synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5057–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, J.; Yoon, S.J.; Hsieh, B.-Y.; Tai, W.; O’Donnell, M.; Gao, X. Stably doped conducting polymer nanoshells by surface initiated polymerization. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8217–8222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Allen, F.H.; Kennard, O.; Watson, O.G. Tables of bond lengths determined by X-Ray and neutron diffraction. Part I. Bond lengths in organic compounds. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II 1987, 12, S1–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Matsuguchi, M.; Asahi, T. Properties and stability of polyaniline nanofiber ammonia sensors fabricated by novel on-substrate method. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 160, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; Nie, S.; Li, H.; Ali, R.; Fu, J.; Xiong, H.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Lau, W.-M.; Mahmood, N.; et al. 3D hollow quasi-graphite capsules/polyaniline hybrid with a high performance for room-temperature ammonia gas sensors. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2343–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhu, C.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Liu, L.; Chen, Q.; Gao, B. Self-assembly polyaniline films for the high-performance ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 365, 131928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. YADAV, A.; Kumar, J.; Shahabuddin, M.D.; Agarwal, A.; Saini, P. Improved ammonia sensing by solution processed dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid doped polyaniline nanorod networks. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 139571–139579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, S.; Sun, G. High sensitivity ammonia sensor using a hierarchical polyaniline/poly(ethylene-co-glycidyl methacrylate) nanofibrous composite membrane. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6473–6477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, W.; Li, G.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, J.; Jing, C.; Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Y.; Chu, J. Dynamic liquid phase deposition of doped nanostructured PANI tube sensor, for trace-level NH3 gas detection. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 305, 127–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 24 03695 g001
Figure 1. Illustrations of (a) graft polymer conformations, (b) grafted PANI chains, and (c) the diffusion of ammonia molecules within the PANI graft chains.
Figure 1. Illustrations of (a) graft polymer conformations, (b) grafted PANI chains, and (c) the diffusion of ammonia molecules within the PANI graft chains.
Sensors 24 03695 g001
Sensors 24 03695 g002
Figure 2. Three-layered structure of the flexible polyaniline graft film sensor.
Figure 2. Three-layered structure of the flexible polyaniline graft film sensor.
Sensors 24 03695 g002
Sensors 24 03695 g003
Figure 3. Illustration of PANI graft film sensor preparation: (a) polyaniline graft film; (b) sensor structure.
Figure 3. Illustration of PANI graft film sensor preparation: (a) polyaniline graft film; (b) sensor structure.
Sensors 24 03695 g003
Sensors 24 03695 g004
Figure 4. SEM images of the surfaces of (a) PET film, (b) PD-coated PET film, (c) PANI grafted on PET film, and (d) cross-section of PANI grafted film.
Figure 4. SEM images of the surfaces of (a) PET film, (b) PD-coated PET film, (c) PANI grafted on PET film, and (d) cross-section of PANI grafted film.
Sensors 24 03695 g004
Sensors 24 03695 g005
Figure 5. The characteristics of the PANI graft film sensor: (a) response–recovery curves to 250 ppm of NH3 measured at 30 °C and 50 °C, (b) response–recovery curve to 50–250 ppm NH3 at 50 °C, (c) calibration curve measured at 50 °C, and (d) comparison of response–recovery curves of sensors with different PANI forms.
Figure 5. The characteristics of the PANI graft film sensor: (a) response–recovery curves to 250 ppm of NH3 measured at 30 °C and 50 °C, (b) response–recovery curve to 50–250 ppm NH3 at 50 °C, (c) calibration curve measured at 50 °C, and (d) comparison of response–recovery curves of sensors with different PANI forms.
Sensors 24 03695 g005
Sensors 24 03695 g006
Figure 6. Illustration showing how the sensor is bent into shape.
Figure 6. Illustration showing how the sensor is bent into shape.
Sensors 24 03695 g006
Sensors 24 03695 g007
Figure 7. Effects of the bending angle on the response recovery curves of the PANI grafted film sensor to 250 ppm NH3 at 50 °C: (a) sensor bent 60° outward; (b) sensor bent 60° inward.
Figure 7. Effects of the bending angle on the response recovery curves of the PANI grafted film sensor to 250 ppm NH3 at 50 °C: (a) sensor bent 60° outward; (b) sensor bent 60° inward.
Sensors 24 03695 g007
Table 1. The relationship between the structure of the polyaniline film and its gas-sensing characteristics to 250 ppm NH3.
Table 1. The relationship between the structure of the polyaniline film and its gas-sensing characteristics to 250 ppm NH3.
StructureDopantCNH3/ppmT/°CS/-t80/minRe/%
GraftH2SO425050351190
NanofiberHCl5005023989
MicrosphereH2SO4250301791992
GranuleH2SO42505061585
Table 2. A comparison of response values between the PANI grafted film sensor and previously reported room-temperature-sensitive polyaniline ammonia gas sensors.
Table 2. A comparison of response values between the PANI grafted film sensor and previously reported room-temperature-sensitive polyaniline ammonia gas sensors.
MaterialStructureCNH3/ppmT/°CHumidity/%RHS 1/-Ref.
PANIGraft10050dry20This work
PANIFilm4020 ± 3304.2[43]
PANINanorod5027501.2[44]
PANINanotube50254027[27]
PANI/(PE-co-GMA)Nanofiber2526 ± 125 ± 325[45]
PVDF@PANICore–shell1025502[31]
In2O3@PANICore–shell100205045[23]
GO/PANIHollow Rambutan100202531[33]
WO3@PANINanoplate100254033[22]
PANI/TiO2Tube100R.T.dry16[46]
PANI/celluloseNanofiber10R.T.455[30]
PANI:PSS/Ti3C2TXNanoplate1024203.9[18]
PANI/HNTsNanotube5025502.6[26]
1 Some values of S were recalculated to match our definition S = ΔRNH3/R0.
Table 3. Effects of the bending angle on the sensing characteristics of the PANI grafted film sensor to 250 ppm NH3 at 50 °C.
Table 3. Effects of the bending angle on the sensing characteristics of the PANI grafted film sensor to 250 ppm NH3 at 50 °C.
Bending Anglelog (R0/Ω)Normalized S Value/%t80/minRe/%
Sensor 104.71001181
−605.4741384
Sensor 204.8100992
+605.491990
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsuguchi, M.; Horio, K.; Uchida, A.; Kakunaka, R.; Shiba, S. A Flexible Ammonia Gas Sensor Based on a Grafted Polyaniline Grown on a Polyethylene Terephthalate Film. Sensors 2024, 24, 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113695

AMA Style

Matsuguchi M, Horio K, Uchida A, Kakunaka R, Shiba S. A Flexible Ammonia Gas Sensor Based on a Grafted Polyaniline Grown on a Polyethylene Terephthalate Film. Sensors. 2024; 24(11):3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113695

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsuguchi, Masanobu, Kaito Horio, Atsuya Uchida, Rui Kakunaka, and Shunsuke Shiba. 2024. "A Flexible Ammonia Gas Sensor Based on a Grafted Polyaniline Grown on a Polyethylene Terephthalate Film" Sensors 24, no. 11: 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113695

APA Style

Matsuguchi, M., Horio, K., Uchida, A., Kakunaka, R., & Shiba, S. (2024). A Flexible Ammonia Gas Sensor Based on a Grafted Polyaniline Grown on a Polyethylene Terephthalate Film. Sensors, 24(11), 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113695

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop