Bioinformatics Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Efficacy of Kezimuke granules in Treating Urinary Tract Infections by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation
<p>Research Flowchart for the Therapeutic Effect of KZMK Granules on UTIs. In this paper, we employed UPLC-MS/MS to detect the blood components of KZMK granules, identifying a total of 17 blood components as potential active compounds and targets. Subsequently, we collected target information for these components using the SwissTarget Prediction database. Meanwhile, we obtained targets related to UTIs from the GeneCards database and conducted a cross-analysis of the collected drug targets and disease targets to construct a PPI network diagram. Furthermore, we collected normal and diseased gene data from UTI patients from the GEO database, conducted screening for DEGs, and plotted volcano plots and heatmaps to visually display changes in gene expression. We uploaded the drug targets, disease targets, DEGs, and modular genes into Venn diagram analysis, successfully screening out 5 hub genes. For these hub genes, we conducted GO analysis and KEGG pathway analysis and verified the results through molecular docking techniques. In in vivo experiments, we established an evaluation system for the therapeutic effect of KZMK granules on rats with an LPS-induced cystitis model. Through urine sediment leukocyte detection, bladder index assessment, HE pathological staining, immunohistochemical analysis, serum inflammatory factor detection, and Western blot experiments, we verified that KZMK granules exert their therapeutic effect on UTIs by inhibiting the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Identification of Serum Components Derived from KZMK Extracts. (<b>a</b>) Represents the TAIC in Positive Ion Mode for Diverse Serum Samples; (<b>b</b>) Illustrates the TAIC in Negative Ion Mode for Various Serum Samples.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Network Pharmacology Analysis: From top to bottom, they are (<b>a</b>), (<b>b</b>), (<b>c</b>), respectively. (<b>a</b>) Ingredient-Target Network Diagram: The deep blue diamond core in the diagram represents KZMK. The surrounding blue hexagons represent the 17 serum ingredients of KZMK. Due to the excessive length of some component names, abbreviations such as ABCDEF have been used instead, with the specific distribution as follows. A: 5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxychroman-4-one; B: Glycyrrhizic acid; C: 7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl) tetrahydropyran-2-yl] chroman-4-one; D: 5-hydroxy-6,7-dimethoxy-2-[4-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl) tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxyphenyl]chroman-4-one; E: 3-[4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (Note: This ingredient is repeated with F, which may be a typographical error or data redundancy requiring further verification); F: 7-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxytetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chromen-4-one. The three outer circles of squares represent 610 targets, and the size of these squares visually reflects the node degree of the target proteins, i.e., how many ingredients they interact with. (<b>b</b>) Venn Diagram, (<b>c</b>) PPI Network Diagram: In this diagram, the size and color intensity of the squares are defined according to the DEGREE value.</p> "> Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Network Pharmacology Analysis: From top to bottom, they are (<b>a</b>), (<b>b</b>), (<b>c</b>), respectively. (<b>a</b>) Ingredient-Target Network Diagram: The deep blue diamond core in the diagram represents KZMK. The surrounding blue hexagons represent the 17 serum ingredients of KZMK. Due to the excessive length of some component names, abbreviations such as ABCDEF have been used instead, with the specific distribution as follows. A: 5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxychroman-4-one; B: Glycyrrhizic acid; C: 7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl) tetrahydropyran-2-yl] chroman-4-one; D: 5-hydroxy-6,7-dimethoxy-2-[4-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl) tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxyphenyl]chroman-4-one; E: 3-[4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (Note: This ingredient is repeated with F, which may be a typographical error or data redundancy requiring further verification); F: 7-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxytetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chromen-4-one. The three outer circles of squares represent 610 targets, and the size of these squares visually reflects the node degree of the target proteins, i.e., how many ingredients they interact with. (<b>b</b>) Venn Diagram, (<b>c</b>) PPI Network Diagram: In this diagram, the size and color intensity of the squares are defined according to the DEGREE value.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) presents the boxplot of the normalized data. In this visualization, various colors are utilized to distinguish between different datasets. The rows of the boxplot depict individual samples, while the columns represent the corresponding gene expression values within those samples. (<b>b</b>) depicts a volcano plot, constructed utilizing fold change values and adjusted <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values. Its purpose is to emphasize notable alterations in gene expression. Specifically, the volcano plot features red dots denoting upregulated genes; contrastingly, blue dots signify downregulated genes. The horizontal dotted line in the figure represents the significance threshold line. (<b>c</b>) presents a heatmap illustrating differential gene expression. Within this heatmap, a range of colors is utilized to depict the diverse trends of gene expression across various tissues. Notably, the heatmap highlights the top 50 genes with the most significant upregulation and downregulation, offering a comprehensive view of the most prominent changes in gene expression.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Venn Diagram: Selection of Overlapping Genes. In this Venn diagram, green represents KZMK, blue represents UTls, while pink and yellow represent upregulated genes and downregulated genes, respectively; (<b>b</b>) GO Analysis; (<b>c</b>) KEGG Pathway Diagram.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) A heatmap displaying the docking results of 17 serum components against 5 core targets for KZMK. The intensity of the colors in the diagram reflects the affinity or association between the receptor and the ligand, with darker colors indicating stronger binding activity. (<b>b</b>) The molecular docking results of NLRP3 with the following compounds are shown. The red box in the figure marks the location of the drug molecules.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>The impact of varying concentrations of KZMK on the WBC count in urine sediments was investigated. Representative photomicrographs were obtained to depict the WBC count in urine sediments (<b>a</b>). Additionally, a graphic representation of the WBC count was provided. The red arrow in the figure points to white blood cells. (<b>b</b>). The bar graph presented in (<b>b</b>) illustrates the mean and standard error of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6) for the WBC count. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences: ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 denote significant differences compared to the Sham group, respectively. Similarly, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 indicates significant differences compared to the LPS group, respectively. Group descriptions are as follows: Sham represents the sham-operated group; LPS represents the lipopolysaccharide group; LPS + L represents the group receiving 0.676 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + M represents the group receiving 1.352 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + H represents the group receiving 2.703 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + LEVO represents the group receiving 10 mg·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of levofloxacin hydrochloride after LPS instillation.</p> "> Figure 8
<p>Influence: Effects of Different Concentrations of KZMK on Bladder Morphology and Bladder Index. The figure presents representative photographs of bladder morphology for each group (<b>a</b>) and a graphical representation of the bladder index (<b>b</b>). The bar graph presented in (<b>b</b>) illustrates the mean and standard error of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6) for the WBC count. Statistical analysis indicated significant variations: ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 represent significant differences in comparison to the Sham group, respectively. Likewise, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 shows significant differences when compared to the LPS group, respectively. Group descriptions are as follows: Sham represents the sham-operated group; LPS represents the lipopolysaccharide group; LPS + L represents the group receiving 0.676 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + M represents the group receiving 1.352 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + H represents the group receiving 2.703 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + LEVO represents the group receiving 10 mg·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of levofloxacin hydrochloride after LPS instillation.</p> "> Figure 9
<p>KZMK alleviates histopathological alte (magnification 40× and 200×). The yellow arrows respectively point to the areas where bleeding, edema, and severe immune infiltration occur. Group descriptions are as follows: Sham represents the sham-operated group; LPS represents the lipopolysaccharide group; LPS + L represents the group receiving 0.676 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + M represents the group receiving 1.352 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + H represents the group receiving 2.703 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + LEVO represents the group receiving 10 mg·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of levofloxacin hydrochloride after LPS instillation.</p> "> Figure 10
<p>KZMK treatment attenuates the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes in the bladders of LPS-instilled rats. Representative immunohistochemical images from bladder sections of rats in each group show staining for NLRP3, GSDMD, and Caspase-1. The scale bars for these photomicrographs are all 50 μm. In the statistical results illustrates the mean and standard error of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6) for the WBC count. Statistical analysis indicated significant variations: ns represents no statistical difference. ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 represent significant differences in comparison to the Sham group, respectively. Likewise, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 and ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 show significant differences when compared to the LPS group, respectively, and ns represents not statistically significant when comparing. Group descriptions are as follows: Sham represents the sham-operated group; LPS represents the lipopolysaccharide group; LPS + L represents the group receiving 0.676 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + M represents the group receiving 1.352 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + H represents the group receiving 2.703 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + LEVO represents the group receiving 10 mg·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of levofloxacin hydrochloride after LPS instillation.</p> "> Figure 11
<p>Displays the quantitative measurement results of IL-1β and IL-18 in the serum of rats from various groups. (<b>a</b>) represents the content of IL-1<span class="html-italic">β</span> in serum. (<b>b</b>) represents the content of IL-18 in serum. In the statistical results illustrates the mean and standard error of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6) for the WBC count. Statistical analysis indicated significant variations: ns represents no statistical difference. ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 represent significant differences in comparison to the Sham group, respectively. Likewise, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 shows significant differences when compared to the LPS group, respectively, and ns represents not statistically significant when comparing. Group descriptions are as follows: Sham represents the sham-operated group; LPS represents the lipopolysaccharide group; LPS + L represents the group receiving 0.676 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + M represents the group receiving 1.352 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + H represents the group receiving 2.703 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + LEVO represents the group receiving 10 mg·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of levofloxacin hydrochloride after LPS instillation.</p> "> Figure 12
<p>Displays the immunoblots and quantitative expression of representative proteins of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the bladder tissues of rats from various groups after treatment. Here, β-actin was used as the internal control standard. In the statistical results illustrates the mean and standard error of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6) for the WBC count. Statistical analysis indicated significant variations: ns represents no statistical difference. # <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 and ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 represent significant differences in comparison to the Sham group, respectively. Likewise, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 and ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 show significant differences when compared to the LPS group, respectively, and ns represents not statistically significant when comparing. Group descriptions are as follows: Sham represents the sham-operated group; LPS represents the lipopolysaccharide group; LPS + L represents the group receiving 0.676 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + M represents the group receiving 1.352 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + H represents the group receiving 2.703 g·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of KZMK after LPS instillation; LPS + LEVO represents the group receiving 10 mg·kg<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> of levofloxacin hydrochloride after LPS instillation.</p> "> Figure 13
<p>Illustrates the mechanism of action of KZMK in treating urinary tract infections by inhibiting the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Note: This diagram was created using Figdraw 2.0. In the figure, the arrows point to the downstream parts. The T-shaped arrows indicate blockage.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Identification of Serum Components of KZMK Extract
2.2. Network Pharmacology Analysis
2.2.1. Network Pharmacology Analysis
2.2.2. Acquisition of Differentially Expressed Genes
2.2.3. Functional Enrichment Analysis
2.2.4. Molecular Docking
2.3. White Blood Cell Count in Urine Sediment
2.4. Evaluation of Bladder Morphology and Bladder Index
2.5. Bladder Histopathology Analysis
2.6. Bladder Immunohistochemistry Analysis
2.7. Serum Inflammatory Cytokines Assay
2.8. Western Blot Analysis
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Reagents and Drugs
4.2. Animals
4.3. Preparation of KZMK Granules
4.4. Preparation of Serum Samples for UPLC-MS/MS
4.5. UPLC-MS/MS Analysis
4.6. Network Pharmacology
4.6.1. Screening for KZMK and Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) Targets
4.6.2. Network Construction
4.6.3. Differentially Expressed Genes Screening
4.6.4. Functional Enrichment Analysis
4.6.5. Molecular Docking
4.7. In Vivo Experiments
4.7.1. White Blood Cell Count in Urine Sediment
4.7.2. Evaluation of Bladder Morphology and Bladder Index
4.7.3. Bladder Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry Analysis
4.7.4. Serum Inflammatory Cytokines Assay
4.7.5. Western Blot Analysis
4.7.6. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mydock-McGrane, L.K.; Hannan, T.J.; Janetka, J.W. Rational design strategies for FimH antagonists: New drugs on the horizon for urinary tract infection and Crohn’s disease. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 711–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sackesen, C.; Sekerel, B.E.; Orhan, F.; Kocabas, C.N.; Tuncer, A.; Adalioglu, G. The etiology of different forms of urticaria in childhood. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2004, 21, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamm, W.E.; Norrby, S.R. Urinary tract infections: Disease panorama and challenges. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 183 (Suppl. S1), S1–S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zi, H.; Liu, M.-Y.; Luo, L.-S.; Huang, Q.; Luo, P.-C.; Luan, H.-H.; Huang, J.; Wang, D.-Q.; Wang, Y.-B.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; et al. Global burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, urolithiasis, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer from 1990 to 2021. Mil. Med. Res. 2024, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geerlings, S.E. Clinical Presentations and Epidemiology of Urinary Tract Infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lindblad, A.; Johansson, C.; Persson, K.; Demirel, I. The role of caspase-1, caspase-4 and NLRP3 in regulating the host cell response evoked by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, K.; Grigoryan, L.; Trautner, B. Urinary Tract Infection. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017, 167, Itc49–Itc64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bidet, P.; Bonarcorsi, S.; Bingen, E. Virulence factors and pathophysiology of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Arch. Pediatr. 2012, 19 (Suppl. S3), S80–S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khawcharoenporn, T.; Vasoo, S.; Singh, K. Urinary Tract Infections due to Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a Chicago Emergency Department. Emerg. Med. Int. 2013, 2013, 258517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saravanan, M.; Ramachandran, B.; Barabadi, H. The prevalence and drug resistance pattern of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 114, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaker, M.; Zaki, A.; Asser, S.L.; El Sayed, I. Trends and predictors of antimicrobial resistance among patients with urinary tract infections at a tertiary hospital facility in Alexandria, Egypt: A retrospective record-based classification and regression tree analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houwati, N.; Yuerlin, M.; Baishanbo, A. Experimental Study on the Effect of Kazak Ethnic Medicine Kezimuke Granules on Immune Function in Immunosuppressed Mice. Cent. South Pharm. 2016, 14, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar]
- Kuli, L.; Mani, Z.; Guli, S.; Baishanbo, A. Research on the Anti-inflammatory Mechanism of Kezimuke Granules, a Kazakh Folk Medicine. Chin. Community Dr. Med. Spec. 2012, 14, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
- Ito, W.; Choi, N.; Letner, G.; Genz, N.; Prokop, D.; Valadon, C.; Sardiu, M.E.; Smith, H.; Whiles, B.B.; Molina, W.R. Preoperative urine culture with contaminants is not associated with increased risk for urinary tract infection after ureteroscopic stone treatment. World J. Urol. 2024, 42, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sivanandy, P.; Manirajan, P.; Qi, O.W.; Khai, O.T.; Wei, O.C.; Ying, N.W.; Wadingasafi, N.A.N.; Azhar, N.A.; Rohaizan, N.A.N. A systematic review of efficacy and safety of newer drugs approved from 2016 to 2023 for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Ann. Med. 2024, 56, 2403724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rhee, S.H. Lipopolysaccharide: Basic biochemistry, intracellular signaling, and physiological impacts in the gut. Intest. Res. 2014, 12, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karki, R.; Kanneganti, T.D. Diverging inflammasome signals in tumorigenesis and potential targeting. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2019, 19, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Linden, J.; Koch-Nolte, F.; Dahl, G. Purine Release, Metabolism, and Signaling in the Inflammatory Response. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 37, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, F.; Ma, J.; Li, W.; Liu, Q.; Qin, X.; Qian, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, D.; et al. The orphan receptor Nur77 binds cytoplasmic LPS to activate the non-canonical NLRP3 inflammasome. Immunity 2023, 56, 753–767.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauernfeind, F.G.; Horvath, G.; Stutz, A.; Alnemri, E.S.; MacDonald, K.; Speert, D.; Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Wu, J.; Monks, B.G.; Fitzgerald, K.A.; et al. Cutting edge: NF-kappaB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juliana, C.; Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Kang, S.; Farias, A.; Qin, F.; Alnemri, E.S. Non-transcriptional priming and deubiquitination regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36617–36622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christgen, S.; Place, D.E.; Kanneganti, T.D. Toward targeting inflammasomes: Insights into their regulation and activation. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Ding, J.; Li, P.; Hu, L.; Shao, F. Inflammatory caspases are innate immune receptors for intracellular LPS. Nature 2014, 514, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hagar, J.A.; Powell, D.A.; Aachoui, Y.; Ernst, R.K.; Miao, E.A. Cytoplasmic LPS activates caspase-11: Implications in TLR4-independent endotoxic shock. Science 2013, 341, 1250–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhen, H.; Nie, C. Network Pharmacology Integrated with Transcriptomics Deciphered the Potential Mechanism of Codonopsis pilosula against Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 1340194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.Y.; Hua, K.F.; Hsu, W.H.; Suzuki, Y.; Chu, L.J.; Lee, Y.C.; Takahata, A.; Lee, S.L.; Wu, C.C.; Nikolic-Paterson, D.J.; et al. IgA Nephropathy Benefits from Compound K Treatment by Inhibiting NF-κB/NLRP3 Inflammasome and Enhancing Autophagy and SIRT1. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, Y.; Zhu, X.; Shen, J.; Chen, H.; Zhou, G. Mechanism of Nicotiflorin in San-Ye-Qing rhizome for anti-inflammatory effect in ulcerative colitis. Phytomedicine 2024, 129, 155564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiraoka, M.; Hida, Y.; Tuchida, S.; Tsukahara, H.; Yamashita, M.; Kuroda, M.; Sudo, M. Diagnosis of urinary tract infection by urine microscopy using a disposable counting chamber. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 1993, 53, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suarez, A.; Delgado, Y.; Servais, A.; Verardi, N.; Durand, D.; Litaneur, S.; Wyart, V.; Nizard, J.; Nguyen, J.-P. Effects of Combining Music Therapy, Light Therapy, and Chromotherapy in the Treatment of Chronic Pain Patients: A Pilot Study. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2024, 2024, 3006352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bjorling, D.E.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Boldon, K.; Bushman, W. Bacterial cystitis is accompanied by increased peripheral thermal sensitivity in mice. J. Urol. 2008, 179, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negash, A.A.; Olson, R.M.; Griffin, S.; Gale, M. Modulation of calcium signaling pathway by hepatitis C virus core protein stimulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kappelhoff, S.; Margheritis, E.G.; Cosentino, K. New insights into Gasdermin D pore formation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2024, 52, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, D.J.; Du, F.; Chen, S.-W.; Nakasaki, M.; Rana, I.; Shih, V.F.; Hoffmann, A.; Jamora, C. Regulation and Function of the Caspase-1 in an Inflammatory Microenvironment. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2012–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ketelut-Carneiro, N.; Souza, C.O.S.; Benevides, L.; Gardinassi, L.G.; Silva, M.C.; Tavares, L.A.; Zamboni, D.S.; Silva, J.S. Caspase-11-dependent IL-1α release boosts Th17 immunity against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miao, N.J.; Xie, H.-Y.; Xu, D.; Yin, J.-Y.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Wang, B.; Yin, F.; Zhou, Z.-L.; Cheng, Q.; Chen, P.-P.; et al. Caspase-11 promotes renal fibrosis by stimulating IL-1β maturation via activating caspase-1. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2019, 40, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gene Ontology Consortium. Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D331–D338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, G.; Wang, L.-G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clementel, D.; Arrías, P.N.; Mozaffari, S.; Osmanli, Z.; Castro, X.A.; Curators, R.; Borucki, E.L.; Cabrera, M.; Chinestrad, P.; Czarnowski, I.; et al. RepeatsDB in 2025: Expanding annotations of structured tandem repeats proteins on AlphaFoldDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 53, D575–D581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morris, G.M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M.F.; Belew, R.K.; Goodsell, D.S.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Chen, J.; Cheng, T.; Gindulyte, A.; He, J.; He, S.; Li, Q.; Shoemaker, B.A.; Thiessen, P.A.; Yu, B.; et al. PubChem 2019 update: Improved access to chemical data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D1102–D1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Boyle, N.M.; Banck, M.; James, C.A.; Morley, C.; Vandermeersch, T.; Hutchison, G.R. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 2011, 3, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Compounds | Formula | Retention Time (min) | ION Mode | KZMK Extract | Blank Serum | Medicated Serum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diammonium Glycyrrhizinate | C42H62O16 | 432′48″ | Negative | 18,766,070.02 | 0 | 30,073.55471 |
Nicotiflorin | C27H30O15 | 305′12″ | Positive | 16,350,147.23 | 0 | 15,289.76949 |
5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-chromen-4-one | C23H24O11 | 320′6″ | Positive | 76,995,735.65 | 0 | 72,415.57323 |
(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-[(2R,3R,4S,5S,6S)-2-[[(3S,6aR,6bS,8aS,12aR,14bS)-11-carboxy-4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,14b-heptamethyl-14-oxo-2,3,4a,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,12a,14a-dodecahydro-1H-picen-3-yl]oxy]-6-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxy-tetrahydropyran-3-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxy-tetrahydropyran-2-carboxylic acid | C42H62O16 | 432′48″ | Negative | 18,766,070.02 | 0 | 30,073.55471 |
Aloeresin D | C29H32O11 | 310′36″ | Positive | 19,794,295.13 | 0 | 17,004.26057 |
7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydropyran-2-yl]chromen-4-one | C21H20O9 | 253′24″ | Positive | 51,257,590.5 | 0 | 39,272.54251 |
Rhodiosin | C27H30O16 | 295′30″ | Positive | 104,511,264.8 | 0 | 24,202.21409 |
Aurantio-obtusin beta-D-glucoside | C23H24O12 | 320′54″ | Positive | 27,694,119.77 | 0 | 36,460.56346 |
5-hydroxy-6,7-dimethoxy-2-[4-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxyphenyl]chromen-4-one | C23H24O11 | 320′6″ | Positive | 76,995,735.65 | 0 | 72,415.57323 |
Maltose monohydrate | C12H22O11 | 61′18″ | Negative | 92,751,317.83 | 0 | 38,031.91904 |
3-[4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyl-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chromen-4-one | C27H30O15 | 305′12″ | Positive | 16,350,147.23 | 0 | 15,289.76949 |
7-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyl-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chromen-4-one | C27H30O15 | 305′12″ | Positive | 16,350,147.23 | 0 | 15,289.76949 |
Iristectorin B | C23H24O12 | 320′54″ | Positive | 27,694,119.77 | 0 | 36,460.56346 |
Hispidulin 7-glucuronide | C22H20O12 | 319′00″ | Positive | 8,502,082.77 | 0 | 59,789.12333 |
Lawsone | C10H6O3 | 401′18″ | Positive | 14,586,267.49 | 0 | 11,889.90864 |
Ginsenoside Ro | C48H76O19 | 389′24″ | Negative | 21,575,462.8 | 0 | 152,947.9881 |
Lithospermic acid | C27H22O12 | 264′18″ | Negative | 245,512,707 | 0 | 36,592.9604 |
Beta-Caryophyllene Alcohol | C15H26O | 251′48″ | Positive | 15,798,098.93 | 0 | 16,698.78599 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Baishan, A.; Aikebaier, A.; Dilimulati, D.; Nueraihemaiti, N.; Paerhati, Y.; Hailati, S.; Maihemuti, N.; Zhou, W. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Efficacy of Kezimuke granules in Treating Urinary Tract Infections by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041764
Baishan A, Aikebaier A, Dilimulati D, Nueraihemaiti N, Paerhati Y, Hailati S, Maihemuti N, Zhou W. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Efficacy of Kezimuke granules in Treating Urinary Tract Infections by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(4):1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041764
Chicago/Turabian StyleBaishan, Alhar, Alifeiye Aikebaier, Dilihuma Dilimulati, Nuerbiye Nueraihemaiti, Yipaerguli Paerhati, Sendaer Hailati, Nulibiya Maihemuti, and Wenting Zhou. 2025. "Bioinformatics Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Efficacy of Kezimuke granules in Treating Urinary Tract Infections by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 4: 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041764
APA StyleBaishan, A., Aikebaier, A., Dilimulati, D., Nueraihemaiti, N., Paerhati, Y., Hailati, S., Maihemuti, N., & Zhou, W. (2025). Bioinformatics Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Efficacy of Kezimuke granules in Treating Urinary Tract Infections by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(4), 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041764