A series of interconnected short films follows a washed-up producer as he pitches insane story lines featuring some of the biggest stars in Hollywood.A series of interconnected short films follows a washed-up producer as he pitches insane story lines featuring some of the biggest stars in Hollywood.A series of interconnected short films follows a washed-up producer as he pitches insane story lines featuring some of the biggest stars in Hollywood.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 5 nominations
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe movie was filmed over a span of four years. Production took so long because filming had to be done around the actors' busy schedules. The segment with Kate Winslet and Hugh Jackman was the first to be filmed, and producer Charles B. Wessler used it to secure the financing for the rest of the movie. He called in a lot of favors to get as many high-profile actors as possible for the other short films, most of them willing to work for a few days on something unconventional. However, almost none of the actors knew completely what the other segments were about, or how the full movie would be. When it came out, none of the major actors wanted to promote it.
- GoofsIn the second segment, the guy is pouring coffee into a cup being held, after the scene change, the cup is on the coffee table.
- Quotes
Nathan: [segment "Middleschool Date"] Hello, 9-1-1? Yeah, my friend is bleeding out of her vagina!
Dad (segment "Middleschool Date"): Nathan, Nathan, listen.
Nathan: Why are you laughing at me?
- Crazy creditsThe "Beezel" segment runs in between the segment credits and the rest of the credits.
- Alternate versionsThe wraparound involving the segments being movie pitches was replaced in the UK Alternate Cut Version, released on the UK Blu-Ray, with an alternate wraparound about two teenagers and an 11-year-old trying to find the most banned movie in the world.
- ConnectionsEdited from Dante's Peak (1997)
Featured review
After I watched the movie I was utterly shocked to see that it was universally panned by the critics. I still cannot believe it only got 5% on the t-meter. I understand people not liking the film. It is an *intense* blue comedy and more than a fair share of gags crossover into the gross instead of funny territory. But for my money more than enough gags land to be worthwhile. Several of the sections-the batman parody, the opening date sequence, animated cat-are quite funny and in the case of the opening date sort of clever behind the blue comedy. There is an twilight zone edge Winslet slowly losing her mind because no one else seems to notice the gag. A few are serviceable as well.
Now it is true several sections are quite bad. iBabe was pretty useless along with the one with Emma Stone. But the worse offender was the Proposition. It is easily the grossest short in the anthology and it is largely not funny. More to the point it is placed too soon in context and undermines the framing device. It is hard to top that one for blue comedy content and the film never quite recovers. I feel so bad for Pratt. It should have been removed entirely or placed much later in the movie.
The framing device is a quasi-successful satire of the vapidness of mainstream film making, especially the disposable comedies al Tag that come out ever summer. This attempt to ground the shorts in a larger statement sets the movie apart for me. It is not a success-it does not work in the end-but the film is more engaging than a lot of other films that have come out.
The film is not good but it *is* different. Sometimes that is enough to recommend it.
Now it is true several sections are quite bad. iBabe was pretty useless along with the one with Emma Stone. But the worse offender was the Proposition. It is easily the grossest short in the anthology and it is largely not funny. More to the point it is placed too soon in context and undermines the framing device. It is hard to top that one for blue comedy content and the film never quite recovers. I feel so bad for Pratt. It should have been removed entirely or placed much later in the movie.
The framing device is a quasi-successful satire of the vapidness of mainstream film making, especially the disposable comedies al Tag that come out ever summer. This attempt to ground the shorts in a larger statement sets the movie apart for me. It is not a success-it does not work in the end-but the film is more engaging than a lot of other films that have come out.
The film is not good but it *is* different. Sometimes that is enough to recommend it.
- CubsandCulture
- Nov 22, 2019
- Permalink
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $6,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $8,840,453
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $4,805,878
- Jan 27, 2013
- Gross worldwide
- $32,443,111
- Runtime1 hour 30 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content