44
Metascore
14 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 70VarietyJoe LeydonVarietyJoe LeydonFirst-time helmer Patrick Tatopoulos (who designed creatures for all three pics) offers a satisfyingly exciting monster rally that often plays like a period swashbuckler.
- 70The Hollywood ReporterMichael RechtshaffenThe Hollywood ReporterMichael RechtshaffenThanks to sturdy performances by holdovers Michael Sheen and Bill Nighy as well as tidy, unfussy direction by first-timer Patrick Tatopoulos, the creature designer who is taking the reins from originator Len Wiseman, the third installment in the successful franchise should be to the fan base's lycan.
- 60The New York TimesManohla DargisThe New York TimesManohla DargisAlthough the presence of Mr. Sheen is initially distracting, it soon becomes the movie's greatest asset. There is, as it turns out, some benefit to having a real performance even in a formulaic entertainment like this.
- 58Entertainment WeeklyEntertainment WeeklySheen and Nighy do their best with the material, but this is easily the worst Underworld so far.
- 50TimeRichard CorlissTimeRichard CorlissThe enterprise is sluggish when it's not grinding toward the preposterous.
- 50ReelViewsJames BerardinelliReelViewsJames BerardinelliThe first film was significantly better and, therefore, is the place to start for anyone with a modicum of interest. Underworld: Rise of the Lycans is an also-ran that is likely to be appreciated only by completists.
- Grimly competent.
- 50TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineWhile it may not be "Citizen Canine," Rise of the Lycans tells its tale competently and without the derivative nature of its predecessors.
- 33The A.V. ClubTasha RobinsonThe A.V. ClubTasha RobinsonClumsy, ephemeral, and wholly unnecessary.
- 20EmpireKim NewmanEmpireKim NewmanA needless threequel. Note to director: avoid 'rise of the' titles.