In the 22nd century, a scientist attempts to right the wrong his ancestor created: the puzzle box that opens the gates of Hell and unleashes Pinhead and his Cenobite legions.In the 22nd century, a scientist attempts to right the wrong his ancestor created: the puzzle box that opens the gates of Hell and unleashes Pinhead and his Cenobite legions.In the 22nd century, a scientist attempts to right the wrong his ancestor created: the puzzle box that opens the gates of Hell and unleashes Pinhead and his Cenobite legions.
- Awards
- 1 win & 2 nominations
Wren T. Brown
- Parker
- (as Wren Brown)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaKevin Yagher disowned the version with cuts made behind his back due to conflicting artistry ideas. Yagher's version contained much more graphic imagery, plot, and explained everything that happened in the film. The producers disagreed and demanded Pinhead should appear sooner despite every version of the script up until then having him appear around the 40-minute mark. When Yagher was unable to satisfy, he disowned it and never finished filming some final scenes. Joe Chappelle was brought on to finish the film, filming new scenes from re-writes, including the narrative framing device. Some scenes of the original script were thus never shot.
- Goofs(at around 36 mins) As Angelique says to Pinhead "Things seem to have changed" she is standing in front of him. Then as Pinhead responds "Hell is more ordered..." she is now standing closer and to his side. This is because the original filmed line was "Things seem to have changed, I was expecting my clowns" in reference to Demon Clowns that were cut from the past segment of the film. Cutting "I was expecting my clowns" means her position 'jumps' closer to Pinhead and creates this continuity error.
- Quotes
John Merchant: For God's sake!
Pinhead: Do I look like someone who cares what God thinks?
- Crazy creditsThe end credits have the "Filmed in Panavision" moniker, suggesting the film was shot in cinema-scope (2.35:1), however the film was shot in flat (1.85:1) ratio. The end credit was more than likely meant to read "Filmed with Panavision cameras and lenses".
- Alternate versionsThe original cut, still titled "Hellraiser: Bloodline"
- begins in 1784. Lemarchand builds the Lament Configuration, gives it to De L'Isle, and watches as he and Angelique challenge his card player guests to open it. When they do Angelique transforms to a demon and seemingly kills them. Lemerchand goes to Auguste, to suggests building the Elysian Configuration. Angelique visits and seduces Lemarchand. inviting him to a masked ball. Auguste tries to warn him away but is killed by Angelique's demonic clowns. Lemarchand, against his wife's wishes, goes to Angelique's party where she seduces and kisses him. When left alone, De L'Isle attempts to kill Lemarchand so he won't be replaced. An angered Angelique apparently kills De L'Isle and offers Lemarchand riches to help her. He refuses. Genvieve arrives and finds her husband almost dead. Angelique goes to kill her and her unborn child when the near-death De L'Isle appears and uses his magic to banish them all back to Hell. Genvieve flees to America as De L'Isle's servant Jacque summons Angelique back to be his sex slave.
- The central part of the film is mostly the same as the theatrical version, except with a clearer plot where Angelique tries to use the prototype Elysian Configuration to kill Pinhead. Angered, Pinhead summons chains to drag Angelique into the light but it cuts out before she dies. Bobbi then banishes them all back to Hell. Despite some bizarre rumours, there is no "neighbour" character in any version of the film.
- The last part is set in the future. It's very much he same but Paul does not tell his story to Rimmer. Also, the final confrontation features all the Cenobites and Angelique wanting Paul to join her again. He refuses and stays on board the Elysian, dying alongside Pinhead and the Cenobites and ending the bloodline forever.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th (2013)
Featured review
It took Jason Voorhees ten films and twenty-one years to go to space; Pinhead got there after only four films and nine years. That's pretty impressive, if you ask me. On the other hand, the record would be beaten by The Leprechaun in four films over only five years; moreover, the storytelling here is split to the point that we don't get as much of Pinhead In Space as one might hope. I think credited screenwriter Peter Atkins brought some terrific ideas into this fourth 'Hellraiser' film; then again, how much the finished product reflects Atkins' work, and how much it reflects apparent studio interference, is a fair question. And either way way I think it's safe to say that a chief issue facing this is the manner in which it's split. The origin of the puzzle box is a worthy notion to explore; following up on the ending of 'Hell on Earth' is a worthy notion to explore; the endeavor of a twenty-second century engineer trying to bring resolution to the whole sordid saga is a worthy notion to explore. To throw all these notions together in a single picture all but ensures that none will receive all due treatment that they could have had, for in the very least it would have required supreme intelligence and a delicate hand to allow the divided narrative to work as it is. True, there is also a shrewd through-line here in the effort of a bloodline (get it?) to close the same door that it inadvertently opened, but it's still hard to feel like the end result isn't in some measure distracted and unfocused.
One rather assumes diminishing returns of a long-running franchise, especially in horror. The first and second films are dark, gruesome, imaginative classics; the third film is mostly on par at its best, but struggles with definite flaws that place upper limits on its potential. If nothing else is true of this 1996 installment, it at least makes a better first impression than its immediate predecessor, for the dialogue that Peter Atkins put into this screenplay is better than in the last one (if still imperfect), and Kevin Yagher's direction is unquestionably stronger than Anthony Hickox's was. The plot at large may be more troubled in this instance, and the scene writing too, but at least nothing about this movie comes off as outright bad - and I say that even as some of the effects and violence are overly cartoonish. On the contrary, by and large the visuals here are outstanding and gnarly. The art direction is fabulously rich, and the practical effects, blood, gore, and violence are gruesome, not to mention the costume design, hair, and makeup. Post-production additions are more sparingly and tastefully employed here than in the previous title, and they distinctly look better. With more firm direction the acting inevitably comes off much better, and I appreciate the wholehearted earnestness that the cast brought to their performrances: Bruce Ramsay, Valentina Vargas, Kim Myers, Adam Scott, Christine Harnos, and more. In most regards this is admirably well done.
Though imperfect as it presents, I do also think the tale is compelling and satisfying, and eighty-five minutes fly past surprisingly quickly. There does come a point in the last act where the proceedings just feel indulgent, like a slightly more creative variation on a slasher's straightforward march of death, but overall 'Bloodline' is enjoyable. Here's one last qualifier, though: it just doesn't carry as much of a spark as its antecedents. Brutality for its own sake doesn't represent the vitality that is necessary for the horror fun to be particularly vibrant and engaging; the comedic ridiculousness of the first big effect sequence we see (to my pleasure, repeated later) doesn't represent the vitality that is necessary. I did have a good time watching, but it seems to some degree that even with the best efforts of all involved, they were less committed, and putting less of themselves and their heart into making this. That doesn't mean the feature altogether falls short, but even with fewer glaring faults than 'Hellraiser III,' it's less remarkable and doesn't stand as tall - still good, but the weakest of the series up to this point. Suffice to say that anyone who likes what these flicks has to offer will surely like this one, too, but unless you're a diehard fan of someone involved, this isn't anything one needs to prioritize as a viewing experience. Watch 'Bloodline' if you like, but don't go out of your way for it, and save it for a lazy day.
One rather assumes diminishing returns of a long-running franchise, especially in horror. The first and second films are dark, gruesome, imaginative classics; the third film is mostly on par at its best, but struggles with definite flaws that place upper limits on its potential. If nothing else is true of this 1996 installment, it at least makes a better first impression than its immediate predecessor, for the dialogue that Peter Atkins put into this screenplay is better than in the last one (if still imperfect), and Kevin Yagher's direction is unquestionably stronger than Anthony Hickox's was. The plot at large may be more troubled in this instance, and the scene writing too, but at least nothing about this movie comes off as outright bad - and I say that even as some of the effects and violence are overly cartoonish. On the contrary, by and large the visuals here are outstanding and gnarly. The art direction is fabulously rich, and the practical effects, blood, gore, and violence are gruesome, not to mention the costume design, hair, and makeup. Post-production additions are more sparingly and tastefully employed here than in the previous title, and they distinctly look better. With more firm direction the acting inevitably comes off much better, and I appreciate the wholehearted earnestness that the cast brought to their performrances: Bruce Ramsay, Valentina Vargas, Kim Myers, Adam Scott, Christine Harnos, and more. In most regards this is admirably well done.
Though imperfect as it presents, I do also think the tale is compelling and satisfying, and eighty-five minutes fly past surprisingly quickly. There does come a point in the last act where the proceedings just feel indulgent, like a slightly more creative variation on a slasher's straightforward march of death, but overall 'Bloodline' is enjoyable. Here's one last qualifier, though: it just doesn't carry as much of a spark as its antecedents. Brutality for its own sake doesn't represent the vitality that is necessary for the horror fun to be particularly vibrant and engaging; the comedic ridiculousness of the first big effect sequence we see (to my pleasure, repeated later) doesn't represent the vitality that is necessary. I did have a good time watching, but it seems to some degree that even with the best efforts of all involved, they were less committed, and putting less of themselves and their heart into making this. That doesn't mean the feature altogether falls short, but even with fewer glaring faults than 'Hellraiser III,' it's less remarkable and doesn't stand as tall - still good, but the weakest of the series up to this point. Suffice to say that anyone who likes what these flicks has to offer will surely like this one, too, but unless you're a diehard fan of someone involved, this isn't anything one needs to prioritize as a viewing experience. Watch 'Bloodline' if you like, but don't go out of your way for it, and save it for a lazy day.
- I_Ailurophile
- Sep 29, 2023
- Permalink
Everything New on Prime Video in December
Everything New on Prime Video in December
Your guide to all the new movies and shows streaming on Prime Video in the US this month.
- How long is Hellraiser: Bloodline?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Hellraiser IV: Bloodline
- Filming locations
- Culver City, California, USA(Studio)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $4,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $9,336,886
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $4,505,036
- Mar 10, 1996
- Gross worldwide
- $9,336,886
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content