IMDb RATING
6.8/10
5.6K
YOUR RATING
In a post-apocalyptic and dystopian future, all life has been challenged by oppression and tyranny, as the evil Dr. Robotnik is on the wake of controlling Mobius.In a post-apocalyptic and dystopian future, all life has been challenged by oppression and tyranny, as the evil Dr. Robotnik is on the wake of controlling Mobius.In a post-apocalyptic and dystopian future, all life has been challenged by oppression and tyranny, as the evil Dr. Robotnik is on the wake of controlling Mobius.
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination
Browse episodes
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe season two finale, The Doomsday Project (1994) (which was also the final episode), ended with a cliffhanger indicating that Snively was going to take over as the new primary villain on the show starting in season three, and he also revealed that he had a new partner, who was only indicated by red, glowing eyes. Contrary to popular belief that these eyes belonged to Knuckles or Metal Sonic, writer Ben Hurst revealed that they actually belonged to Naugus. He explained that the plans for the third season were: Snively tries to retake control of Robotropolis, but ultimately fails. On the verge of losing it all to the Freedom Fighters, he turns to The Void (1994), where Naugus is busy torturing Robotnik. Snively frees Naugus, and in the process also frees Robotnik and King Acorn. Naugus assumes control, and starts his new command by trying to lure Sally into capture with the King as bait. Robotnik becomes Naugus' lackey. And Snively, now reduced to a simpering nobody, defects to the Freedom Fighters. Hurst went on later to say that more developments would have come along between the relationship of Sonic and Tails, coming a little closer to the game relationship it strayed so far away from. Sooner on down the line in possible future episodes we would also have learned of the origins of Robotnik and Snively.
- GoofsSonic's backpack disappears and re-appears during most episodes.
- Alternate versionsIn the Middle East, all the love scenes are eliminated due to the restrictions against sensuality in children's medias.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Icons: Yuji Naka (2003)
Featured review
When I was a mere slip of a lad at 10 years of age, I came across "Sonic The Hedgehog" on Channel 4. Needless to say, I was hooked. My pre-teen mind just lapped up the endless slapstick adventures of Sonic and Tails battling Robotnik. The fact that I was a fan of the game series too also factored into my enjoyment of this cartoon.
Then, the first season ended, and we were presented with a much darker, more dramatic Sonic cartoon. I took an instant dislike to it - it felt like I'd been betrayed! They'd taken away a show I'd loved and replaced it with what was in my mind a new show, catering to teenagers instead of pre-teens. It was not until last year, when I was 16, that I finally came to appreciate this show. I'd rediscovered it lurking on the back shelf of my friend's video collection. I borrowed it, and was hooked once more.
The point I'm making is that transforming the show from goofy to serious may not have been the best way to attract viewers, and may have contributed to it's decline. Teenagers knew this show as 'goofy' and didn't watch it, so how were they to know it had been changed? As I recall, Channel 4 didn't advertise it particularly well.
Still, both seasons were great. I, too, think they would benefit from a re-show.
Then, the first season ended, and we were presented with a much darker, more dramatic Sonic cartoon. I took an instant dislike to it - it felt like I'd been betrayed! They'd taken away a show I'd loved and replaced it with what was in my mind a new show, catering to teenagers instead of pre-teens. It was not until last year, when I was 16, that I finally came to appreciate this show. I'd rediscovered it lurking on the back shelf of my friend's video collection. I borrowed it, and was hooked once more.
The point I'm making is that transforming the show from goofy to serious may not have been the best way to attract viewers, and may have contributed to it's decline. Teenagers knew this show as 'goofy' and didn't watch it, so how were they to know it had been changed? As I recall, Channel 4 didn't advertise it particularly well.
Still, both seasons were great. I, too, think they would benefit from a re-show.
- chris_1256
- Nov 7, 2002
- Permalink
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content