A crazed killer known as "The Spinebreaker" is terrorizing London with a series of grisly murders. The police seem powerless to stop him.A crazed killer known as "The Spinebreaker" is terrorizing London with a series of grisly murders. The police seem powerless to stop him.A crazed killer known as "The Spinebreaker" is terrorizing London with a series of grisly murders. The police seem powerless to stop him.
Graham Soutten
- Nathaniel
- (as Ben Soutten)
B.C. Hilliam
- Self
- (as Flotsam)
Malcolm 'Mr. Jetsam' McEachern
- Self
- (as Jetsam)
Cecil Bevan
- Small Boy's Father
- (uncredited)
Annie Esmond
- Small Boy's Nanny
- (uncredited)
Jack Sharp
- Policeman
- (uncredited)
Harry Terry
- First Prisoner
- (uncredited)
Ben Williams
- Prison Warder
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaMarjorie Taylor's debut.
- Quotes
Joshua Trimble: Yes, my boy. When people talk of flint-hearted money-lenders, they can't have met Stephen!
- ConnectionsFeatured in Doom Asylum (1987)
Featured review
The Crimes of Stephen Hawke (1936)
** 1/2 (out of 4)
London is under a crippling terror as people are being crushed to death by a man known as The Spinebreaker (Tod Slaughter).
THE CRIMES OF STEPHEN HAWKE starts out unlike any other movie that I can remember. It starts off at a radio station where we basically get a radio broadcast for the first seven or eight minutes and then we finally get to the main story. In a rather shocking manor, it starts off with a child being murdered.
This here was the third film Slaughter made following THE MURDER IN THE RED BARN and THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET. Britain had pretty much put a ban on American horror movies and these British films had to walk a careful line. With that said, this here makes the murder of a child all the more shocking. There are some rather graphic and violent deaths for the era, although they aren't bloody or gory. The sound effects and screams of the people being crushed are certainly the highlight of the picture.
As was often the case with these films, the main reason people watch them today is for the over-the-top and at times wacky performance by Slaughter. I don't know how to describe him other than saying he was like John Barrymore had he gone insane and had a mental breakdown to the point where he was a raving dog. Once again he's all over the place here and he really makes himself stand apart from the other actors. The other actors are good but they just can't overtake the all-mighty Slaughter.
As far as the film goes, it's certainly a bit better than the star's previous two films and a strong argument could be made that this here is about as entertaining as his horror pictures got.
** 1/2 (out of 4)
London is under a crippling terror as people are being crushed to death by a man known as The Spinebreaker (Tod Slaughter).
THE CRIMES OF STEPHEN HAWKE starts out unlike any other movie that I can remember. It starts off at a radio station where we basically get a radio broadcast for the first seven or eight minutes and then we finally get to the main story. In a rather shocking manor, it starts off with a child being murdered.
This here was the third film Slaughter made following THE MURDER IN THE RED BARN and THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET. Britain had pretty much put a ban on American horror movies and these British films had to walk a careful line. With that said, this here makes the murder of a child all the more shocking. There are some rather graphic and violent deaths for the era, although they aren't bloody or gory. The sound effects and screams of the people being crushed are certainly the highlight of the picture.
As was often the case with these films, the main reason people watch them today is for the over-the-top and at times wacky performance by Slaughter. I don't know how to describe him other than saying he was like John Barrymore had he gone insane and had a mental breakdown to the point where he was a raving dog. Once again he's all over the place here and he really makes himself stand apart from the other actors. The other actors are good but they just can't overtake the all-mighty Slaughter.
As far as the film goes, it's certainly a bit better than the star's previous two films and a strong argument could be made that this here is about as entertaining as his horror pictures got.
- Michael_Elliott
- Oct 4, 2017
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Crimen y pasión
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 9 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Crimes of Stephen Hawke (1936) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer