45
Metascore
13 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 78Austin ChronicleAustin ChronicleLook, when Mel Brooks is both a producer and star of your film, you know it’ll have some laughs.
- 65TheWrapKatie WalshTheWrapKatie WalshIt’s a breezy, funny, highly self-referential flick steeped in movie history.
- 63Boston GlobeMark FeeneyBoston GlobeMark FeeneyVisually, the movie is surprisingly inventive, with takeoffs on everything from manga to Hokusai prints. Sure, a lot of the jokes are dumb — you got a problem with that? — but “Paws” is quite smart.
- 60The New York TimesClaire ShafferThe New York TimesClaire ShafferDespite its risqué origins, “Paws of Fury” manages to dish out lighthearted fun, swashbuckling action and surface-level messaging about following your dreams, though not every joke lands.
- 50Washington PostWashington PostSetting aside the puzzling marriage of source material and medium, “Paws” at least makes for a breezy summertime diversion. Contrived but cute, the movie deserves credit for its indictment of insularity, as well as a few hearty laughs.
- 50The Hollywood ReporterFrank ScheckThe Hollywood ReporterFrank ScheckThe screenplay, credited to the five original Blazing Saddles writers as well as Ed Stone and Nate Hopper, is relentlessly silly but only intermittently funny.
- 50San Francisco ChronicleZaki HasanSan Francisco ChronicleZaki Hasan“The Legend of Hank” offers a few hints of the wit and wisdom of its predecessor but is mostly content to coast through a familiar story on the accumulated charm of its star-studded cast of voice actors.
- 40VarietyOwen GleibermanVarietyOwen Gleiberman“Paws of Fury” is an efficient yet underimagined animated fable that barely musters the flavor of a cliché Western comedy.
- 25The Associated PressMark KennedyThe Associated PressMark KennedyParamount’s limp, animated remake actually triggers new stereotypes in the service of trying to expose racism for a pre-teen audience. The studio seems to have reached for legitimacy by bringing the venerated Brooks along for the bumpy ride, darkening both legacies. What emerged sits uneasily at the corner of tribute, parody, theft and laziness.
- 0The A.V. ClubMartin TsaiThe A.V. ClubMartin TsaiReckless cultural insensitivities aside, Stone and Hopper’s writing is simply not smart or funny. Poop and fart jokes comprise the core of their repertoire, and if you’re curious how reliant the film is on this material, Paramount is literally handing out whoopee cushions to promote the film.