AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,4/10
8,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaIn a small college town, a young girl working on a babysitting job in a rural farm is terrorized throughout the night.In a small college town, a young girl working on a babysitting job in a rural farm is terrorized throughout the night.In a small college town, a young girl working on a babysitting job in a rural farm is terrorized throughout the night.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória no total
Cristie Schoen Codd
- Dazed Girl
- (as Cristie Schoen)
Miriam Gonzalez
- Nurse
- (as Miriam Gonzales)
Avaliações em destaque
I went into the movie not expecting much, and ended up being completely satisfied. Babysitter Wanted, unlike countless DTV horrors, is genuinely creepy and has an original plot that will stay with people. A great surprise! Angie (Sarah Thompson) moves into a small town to study in college. She meets people there, but also has a feeling that someone is stalking her. She takes up a babysitter position at a farm house one weekend, and the horror begins.
The first half of the movie is in the vein of the Strangers and When a Stranger Calls. And it's equally effective, if not more. It's easy to identify with Angie's situation. The scares are consistent, although SFX is a little overused. Tension is mounted throughout.
A great twist midway turns the movie into a different direction. Without spoiling anything, the movie veers into a supernatural angle and is equally chilling as the first half although might be too gory and disturbing for some. The plot from here on is original, leading to a satisfying ending which makes room for sequels too.
The acting is surprisingly good from everyone. The productions values are great for a low budget movie, although there are a few lighting issues in the second half.
All in all, Babysitter Wanted is a welcome surprise and horror fans will have a great time with it. Recommended.
The first half of the movie is in the vein of the Strangers and When a Stranger Calls. And it's equally effective, if not more. It's easy to identify with Angie's situation. The scares are consistent, although SFX is a little overused. Tension is mounted throughout.
A great twist midway turns the movie into a different direction. Without spoiling anything, the movie veers into a supernatural angle and is equally chilling as the first half although might be too gory and disturbing for some. The plot from here on is original, leading to a satisfying ending which makes room for sequels too.
The acting is surprisingly good from everyone. The productions values are great for a low budget movie, although there are a few lighting issues in the second half.
All in all, Babysitter Wanted is a welcome surprise and horror fans will have a great time with it. Recommended.
I first saw this in 2010 on a dvd which I own.
Revisited it recently on a fast forward mode.
The only good thing about this movie is the tiny twist.
At first i thought the movie wud be standard hack and slash. A killer tying women n then cutting em for sadistic pleasures but I was so wrong. The dvd poster made it appear like a Hostel rip off.
The movie is boring at times and when the action takes place, most of the climatic scenes are shot in too much darkness that one cannot make out wots going on.
Few scenes r shot in headache inducing flickering lights.
There is an unnecessary gory scene.
The movie has the same ol trope where aft hitting the killer unconscious or when the killer is down, the victim rather than hitting or bashing more, tries to run away.
How many times will they show another trope where the last girl is trying to pass the unconscious body of the killer n suddenly the killer gets up n holds the leg of the girl.
Sarah Thompson the lead actress looks like a younger version of Vera Farmiga.
We have Bill Moseley as a cop in a tiny role.
The movie started off like When a Stranger Calls n then concluded like a lousy version of The Omen.
Revisited it recently on a fast forward mode.
The only good thing about this movie is the tiny twist.
At first i thought the movie wud be standard hack and slash. A killer tying women n then cutting em for sadistic pleasures but I was so wrong. The dvd poster made it appear like a Hostel rip off.
The movie is boring at times and when the action takes place, most of the climatic scenes are shot in too much darkness that one cannot make out wots going on.
Few scenes r shot in headache inducing flickering lights.
There is an unnecessary gory scene.
The movie has the same ol trope where aft hitting the killer unconscious or when the killer is down, the victim rather than hitting or bashing more, tries to run away.
How many times will they show another trope where the last girl is trying to pass the unconscious body of the killer n suddenly the killer gets up n holds the leg of the girl.
Sarah Thompson the lead actress looks like a younger version of Vera Farmiga.
We have Bill Moseley as a cop in a tiny role.
The movie started off like When a Stranger Calls n then concluded like a lousy version of The Omen.
Babysitter Wanted starts off like pretty much every other babysitter in peril film you've probably already seen: a pretty, virginal high-school student takes a child-minding job in a remote house in the boondocks, where she experiences creepy noises, power outages, and mysterious phone-calls, before eventually being attacked by person or persons unknown. In short, it's about as formulaic as a horror film can get.
If you begin to bemoan this film's predictability, though, you're playing right into the hands of its makers, whose seemingly uninspired set-up exists only to catch the viewer off guard with one hell of a curve-ball halfway through: just as the film couldn't get any more predictable, writer/director Jonas Barnes pulls the metaphorical rug from under his viewers feet with an audacious plot development that has to be seen to be believed.
With his illusion of banality well and truly shattered, Barnes is finally free to explore new territory, but despite the introduction of some welcome black humour, a few well conceived moments of tension and a spot of surprisingly gruesome gore, the film never fully capitalises on its rather bonkers mid-point revelation. If only the madness had escalated exponentially from that point on rather than just kicking up a gear and staying there, I'm sure we'd have had another bona fide horror classic on our hands—after all, nothing succeeds like excess!
If you begin to bemoan this film's predictability, though, you're playing right into the hands of its makers, whose seemingly uninspired set-up exists only to catch the viewer off guard with one hell of a curve-ball halfway through: just as the film couldn't get any more predictable, writer/director Jonas Barnes pulls the metaphorical rug from under his viewers feet with an audacious plot development that has to be seen to be believed.
With his illusion of banality well and truly shattered, Barnes is finally free to explore new territory, but despite the introduction of some welcome black humour, a few well conceived moments of tension and a spot of surprisingly gruesome gore, the film never fully capitalises on its rather bonkers mid-point revelation. If only the madness had escalated exponentially from that point on rather than just kicking up a gear and staying there, I'm sure we'd have had another bona fide horror classic on our hands—after all, nothing succeeds like excess!
This movie starts off with a lot of horror clichés like fake scares, the dark stranger in the shadows, the clean cut innocent girl and the love interest, and for the first 45 minutes it goes along that way until a little twist that you kind of don't see coming. Then the movie changes tact, blood, gore, and cringe worthy scenes which for me save this film from being a less than average 'WHEN A STRANGER CALLS' type movie which I would've given it a 3.5 to a not bad but not good 6 out of 10. It was good to see Bill Moseley playing a normal role for him. So as a result like I said, I give this a 6 out of 10, only because of the plot twist and blood.
"Try to be a nice guy and that's the thanks I get!"
Babysitter Wanted is quite similar to the movie House of the Devil in many ways (though it preceded it by about a year). Both movies have a similar premise (young woman at a small college taking a rural babysitting-type job at a spooky locale because she's desperate for money), both try to scare you by slowly building tension (at least, initially) in a large, quiet house, and both have similar sources of evil as the heart of the threat to our unsuspecting heroines.
The main difference between the two movies, though (besides a gruesome twist or two), is that House of the Devil is just better. It's more frightening, more interesting, and more memorable. That's not to say that Babysitter Wanted is bad or not worth watching. It's a sinister movie that's shot well, and I didn't find much reason to complain about the actors (though there is a faintly ridiculous monologue almost an hour into the proceedings that would have been better left out). The story is simple and violence and gore are certainly present (though it happens off-screen as often as on). The last 45 minutes or so are quite different from what comes before, so be prepared for a shift in tone.
The final act is where the two movies really separate themselves, and that's really where I think House of the Devil completely outshines this.
Maybe I would have appreciated Babysitter Wanted more if I hadn't seen a superior,similar movie that I couldn't help comparing it to. Give it a try if you'd like; there are far, far worse horror movies available.
Babysitter Wanted is quite similar to the movie House of the Devil in many ways (though it preceded it by about a year). Both movies have a similar premise (young woman at a small college taking a rural babysitting-type job at a spooky locale because she's desperate for money), both try to scare you by slowly building tension (at least, initially) in a large, quiet house, and both have similar sources of evil as the heart of the threat to our unsuspecting heroines.
The main difference between the two movies, though (besides a gruesome twist or two), is that House of the Devil is just better. It's more frightening, more interesting, and more memorable. That's not to say that Babysitter Wanted is bad or not worth watching. It's a sinister movie that's shot well, and I didn't find much reason to complain about the actors (though there is a faintly ridiculous monologue almost an hour into the proceedings that would have been better left out). The story is simple and violence and gore are certainly present (though it happens off-screen as often as on). The last 45 minutes or so are quite different from what comes before, so be prepared for a shift in tone.
The final act is where the two movies really separate themselves, and that's really where I think House of the Devil completely outshines this.
Maybe I would have appreciated Babysitter Wanted more if I hadn't seen a superior,similar movie that I couldn't help comparing it to. Give it a try if you'd like; there are far, far worse horror movies available.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesSarah Thompson plays Angie Albright, who states her age as eighteen. Sarah was born in October 1979, actually making her twenty-nine at the time of filming.
- Erros de gravaçãoEven though the movie was set in Northern California, the area codes that are listed on the school bulletin board are 310 and 503. Both area codes are for Los Angeles and Northern Oregon respectively. Also, they used real prefixes rather than the movie version of 555.
- Citações
Sam Stanton: [repeating line] Hungry!
- ConexõesReferenced in Babysitter Wanted: Behind the Scenes (2009)
- Trilhas sonorasFading in C# Minor
Written by Richard Larsen, Jennifer M. Cook, Eddie Barajas
Performed by UNA
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Babysitter Wanted?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente