Os destinos de 22 pessoas de diferentes, raças, sexos, crenças e classes sociais se interligam na noite em que o político americano Robert F. Kennedy é assassinado.Os destinos de 22 pessoas de diferentes, raças, sexos, crenças e classes sociais se interligam na noite em que o político americano Robert F. Kennedy é assassinado.Os destinos de 22 pessoas de diferentes, raças, sexos, crenças e classes sociais se interligam na noite em que o político americano Robert F. Kennedy é assassinado.
- Prêmios
- 6 vitórias e 25 indicações
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAt one point during the script development, after developing a case of what writer and director Emilio Estevez called "paralyzing writer's block," Estevez set the script aside. Later, he checked into a remote hotel on the Central California Coast, near Pismo Beach, to work on the script. When he checked in, the woman at the desk recognized him, and asked what he was doing there. "I'm writing a script about the night Bobby Kennedy was killed," he told her. Tears instantly welled in her eyes. "I was there," she replied. Estevez interviewed the woman, who had been a volunteer for Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. He turned her personal story, which included marrying a young man to keep him out of Vietnam, into the Diane Howser character. Estevez said, "She really helped me crack the spine of the story and give it a beating heart. After that, it just started to flow."
- Erros de gravaçãoThe credits include the closing speech detailing the speech as "Robert F. Kennedy's speech, 'On The Mindless Menace of Violence.' The credits say it was delivered in Indianapolis, Indiana on April 5, 1968. This is incorrect; Robert Kennedy gave a speech on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s death in Indianapolis on the previous day but gave the speech presented on the recording at the City Club of Cleveland in Cleveland, Ohio.
- Citações
Robert F. Kennedy: [voiceover] This is a time of shame and sorrow. It is not a day for politics. I have saved this one opportunity, my only event of today, to speak briefly to you about the mindless menace of violence in America which again stains our land and every one of our lives. It is not the concern of any one race. The victims of the violence are black and white, rich and poor, young and old, famous and unknown. They are, most important of all, human beings whom other human beings loved and needed. No one - no matter where he lives or what he does - can be certain who will suffer from some senseless act of bloodshed. And yet it goes on and on and on in this country of ours. Why? What has violence ever accomplished? What has it ever created? No martyr's cause has ever been stilled by an assassin's bullet. No wrongs have ever been righted by riots and civil disorders. A sniper is only a coward, not a hero; and an uncontrolled, uncontrollable mob is only the voice of madness, not the voice of reason. Whenever any American's life is taken by another American unnecessarily - whether it is done in the name of the law or in the defiance of the law, by one man or a gang, in cold blood or in passion, in an attack of violence or in response to violence - whenever we tear at the fabric of the life which another man has painfully and clumsily woven for himself and his children, the whole nation is degraded. "Among free men," said Abraham Lincoln, "there can be no successful appeal from the ballot to the bullet; and those who take such appeal are sure to lose their cause and pay the costs." Yet we seemingly tolerate a rising level of violence that ignores our common humanity and our claims to civilization alike. We calmly accept newspaper reports of civilian slaughter in far-off lands. We glorify killing on movie and television screens and call it entertainment. We make it easy for men of all shades of sanity to acquire whatever weapons and ammunition they desire. Too often we honor swagger and bluster and wielders of force; too often we excuse those who are willing to build their own lives on the shattered dreams of others. Some Americans who preach non-violence abroad fail to practice it here at home. Some who accuse others of inciting riots have by their own conduct invited them. Some look for scapegoats, others look for conspiracies, but this much is clear: violence breeds violence, repression brings retaliation, and only a cleansing of our whole society can remove this sickness from our soul. For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. This is the slow destruction of a child by hunger, and schools without books and homes without heat in the winter. This is the breaking of a man's spirit by denying him the chance to stand as a father and as a man among other men. And this too afflicts us all. I have not come here to propose a set of specific remedies nor is there a single set. For a broad and adequate outline we know what must be done. When you teach a man to hate and fear his brother, when you teach that he is a lesser man because of his color or his beliefs or the policies he pursues, when you teach that those who differ from you threaten your freedom or your job or your family, then you also learn to confront others not as fellow citizens but as enemies, to be met not with cooperation but with conquest; to be subjugated and mastered. We learn, at the last, to look at our brothers as aliens, men with whom we share a city, but not a community; men bound to us in common dwelling, but not in common effort. We learn to share only a common fear, only a common desire to retreat from each other, only a common impulse to meet disagreement with force. For all this, there are no final answers. Yet we know what we must do. It is to achieve true justice among our fellow citizens. The question is not what programs we should seek to enact. The question is whether we can find in our own midst and in our own hearts that leadership of humane purpose that will recognize the terrible truths of our existence. We must admit the vanity of our false distinctions among men and learn to find our own advancement in the search for the advancement of others. We must admit in ourselves that our own children's future cannot be built on the misfortunes of others. We must recognize that this short life can neither be ennobled or enriched by hatred or revenge. Our lives on this planet are too short and the work to be done too great to let this spirit flourish any longer in our land. Of course we cannot vanquish it with a program, nor with a resolution. But we can perhaps remember, if only for a time, that those who live with us are our brothers, that they share with us the same short moment of life; that they seek, as do we, nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and in happiness, winning what satisfaction and fulfillment they can. Surely, this bond of common faith, this bond of common goal, can begin to teach us something. Surely, we can learn, at least, to look at those around us as fellow men, and surely we can begin to work a little harder to bind up the wounds among us and to become in our own hearts brothers and countrymen once again.
Emilio's ahistoric slice 'o' time takes place in the Ambassador Hotel is the, er, fateful hours leading up to Robert Kennedy's assassination. We're introduced to a body of characters all approaching something of a convenient watershed moment in their lives and/or attitudes. They talk about the verge of a new age or represent, as in William H Macy's case, the older generation flirting with the new in order to buy into some of that RFK inspired optimism. Vietnam is discussed of course, as are civil rights, sexual politics, drugs and so on - in other words its 1968 personified and as they pontificate on the issooees that dominated the period zeitgeist, real footage of the senator is spliced in as he does the rounds on the day of the California primary which he'd win of course, only to have the result cancelled by the assassins bullet.
There's nothing about Bobby thats going to offend anyone but there, as another great orator said, is the rub. Emilio's direction is competent but never inspiring like his subject matter - functional but lacking the magic that pulled you into better political ensembles like the aforementioned Altman's Nashville. The characters are reasonably well sketched but not especially involving and how could they be when the real star of the show, Kennedy himself, makes the drama seem very ordinary as his vocalises the film's anti-war, progressive agenda far better than any set of thin characters could. His footage, well integrated into the film, is the real reason to see it. The final minutes, post -bullets, with Kennedy's assured tones giving us a timely lecture on the futility of violence and the merits of tolerance and understanding as Estevez's characters contemplate his shooting just minutes earlier, genuinely does bring a lump to the throat. It lasts five minutes or so but says more about RFK and the tragedy of his death then anything that we've seen in the previous 100 minutes. Not superb then but Estivez's admiration for his man is well received and presented with dignity.
- David_Frames
- 31 de jan. de 2007
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
- How long is Bobby?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- El día que mataron a Kennedy
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 14.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 11.242.801
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 69.039
- 19 de nov. de 2006
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 20.718.608
- Tempo de duração1 hora 57 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1