VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,9/10
61.386
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Raccontata dal punto di vista di Igor, vediamo la storia delle origini oscure del giovane e instabile assistente, la sua amicizia con lo studente di medicina Viktor Von Frankenstein.Raccontata dal punto di vista di Igor, vediamo la storia delle origini oscure del giovane e instabile assistente, la sua amicizia con lo studente di medicina Viktor Von Frankenstein.Raccontata dal punto di vista di Igor, vediamo la storia delle origini oscure del giovane e instabile assistente, la sua amicizia con lo studente di medicina Viktor Von Frankenstein.
- Premi
- 4 vittorie e 1 candidatura
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe mispronunciation of Frankenstein's name is an allusion to a line from Frankenstein Junior (1974).
- BlooperIgor prescribes three ounces of arsenic for Lorelei. The LD50 (lethal dose for 50% of the population) is 13 mg per kg, so the amount recommended by Igor would be about 100 times the LD50.
- Citazioni
Igor: It's alive.
Victor Von Frankenstein: Isn't that rather obvious?
- Colonne sonoreUnter Donner und Blitz, Op. 324
Written by Johann Strauss (as Johann Strauss II)
Arranged by Craig Armstrong
Recensione in evidenza
Perhaps the Frankenstein name is indeed cursed, there hasn't been a great Frankenstein based movie in years, even decades. From last year's I, Frankenstein to Van Helsing who only has it as subplot, all have met mediocre fate. Now armed with robust acting power and visual that oozes Victorian era, also a bit or horror and action attached somewhere, another rendition shares the same exact fate; cinematic tediousness.
A slight modification to the narrative is made, just like Sherlock the movie is narrated from the sidekick's perspective, in this case Igor's (Daniel Radcliffe). Aside from that, there's barely anything new that hasn't been done in similar or better fashion. To its credit, it's not utterly terrible in term of presentation, in fact the visual is rather nice. It's quaintly dark and electric version of last decade metropolis, Tesla would approve.
James McAvoy as the titular Viktor really tries hard on establishing the character. Given the stale material, he still manages to squeeze some emotional scenes as well as a good chemistry with Radcliffe in a bromantic kind of way. Andrew Scott from Moriarty fame, now plays the role of Inspector Turpin. He's the polar opposite of Viktor, conservative yet equally clever and ambitious.
Unfortunately, the far too familiar plot fails to produce any thrill, the strong acting prowess ends up rehearsing the same routine of mad scientist's banter. There's screaming, philosophical argument, faux science and slight mental abuse by the two leads. It's a lot of noise of little dramatic effect. Not that the script is bad in any way, it has occasional witty lines although any hint of humor or charm is muffled by the overly melancholy tone.
At some points, the movie tries to dabble in horror, action and even romance subplot. The atmosphere is already primed for thriller, but the shocking abomination is ironically timid and unmemorable. Action consists of a few scenes of slow motions repetition. Despite the production offering distractions, the main story line is very straightforward and streamlined, and sadly also predictable.
For all the star and flair, though they might be mildly amusing, the end product is a medium so lacking of life.
A slight modification to the narrative is made, just like Sherlock the movie is narrated from the sidekick's perspective, in this case Igor's (Daniel Radcliffe). Aside from that, there's barely anything new that hasn't been done in similar or better fashion. To its credit, it's not utterly terrible in term of presentation, in fact the visual is rather nice. It's quaintly dark and electric version of last decade metropolis, Tesla would approve.
James McAvoy as the titular Viktor really tries hard on establishing the character. Given the stale material, he still manages to squeeze some emotional scenes as well as a good chemistry with Radcliffe in a bromantic kind of way. Andrew Scott from Moriarty fame, now plays the role of Inspector Turpin. He's the polar opposite of Viktor, conservative yet equally clever and ambitious.
Unfortunately, the far too familiar plot fails to produce any thrill, the strong acting prowess ends up rehearsing the same routine of mad scientist's banter. There's screaming, philosophical argument, faux science and slight mental abuse by the two leads. It's a lot of noise of little dramatic effect. Not that the script is bad in any way, it has occasional witty lines although any hint of humor or charm is muffled by the overly melancholy tone.
At some points, the movie tries to dabble in horror, action and even romance subplot. The atmosphere is already primed for thriller, but the shocking abomination is ironically timid and unmemorable. Action consists of a few scenes of slow motions repetition. Despite the production offering distractions, the main story line is very straightforward and streamlined, and sadly also predictable.
For all the star and flair, though they might be mildly amusing, the end product is a medium so lacking of life.
- quincytheodore
- 24 nov 2015
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Victor Frankenstein?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Victor Frankenstein
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 65.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 5.775.076 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 2.469.341 USD
- 29 nov 2015
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 34.227.298 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 50 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What was the official certification given to Victor: La storia segreta del dottor Frankenstein (2015) in Japan?
Rispondi