From Black
- 2023
- 1h 40min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,0/10
2257
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una tossicodipendente in recupero, disperata per la colpa dopo la scomparsa del suo giovane figlio, si ritrova con una strana offerta per conoscere la verità. Fino a che punto è disposta ad ... Leggi tuttoUna tossicodipendente in recupero, disperata per la colpa dopo la scomparsa del suo giovane figlio, si ritrova con una strana offerta per conoscere la verità. Fino a che punto è disposta ad andare per una possibilità di redenzione?Una tossicodipendente in recupero, disperata per la colpa dopo la scomparsa del suo giovane figlio, si ritrova con una strana offerta per conoscere la verità. Fino a che punto è disposta ad andare per una possibilità di redenzione?
- Premi
- 1 vittoria
Eduardo Campirano
- Noah
- (as Eduardo Campirano III)
Alicia S Mason
- Simmons
- (as Alicia Mason)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe quote from the start of the movie is was originally from the Star Wars: Episodio III - La vendetta dei Sith (2005) novelization. The full quote reads: "The dark is generous and it is patient and it always wins - but in the heart of its strength lies its weakness: one lone candle is enough to hold it back. Love is more than a candle. Love can ignite the stars."
Recensione in evidenza
This is an interesting film.
The setting it opens with is different.
A woman in recovery wrestling with the loss of her son.
The drug/recovery aspect is portrayed with a degree of focus and relative accuracy. Something you don't see in alot of movies.
As the movie starts to kick into gear it offers a pretty compelling and engaging journey into it's central theme.
Unfortunately, this movie has a very severe problem.
The acting. The main actress has a crucial flaw in her acting.
Whenever she should have a grimace or sadness in her face she is smiling.
And it looks like a smile.
She is competent in the rest of her acting though.
But this flaw in her acting is too severe to overlook.
I think it comes from a misguided film school tip of how to portray emotion.
I will explain it like this: Alot of times we will see competent actors whose mannerisms when crying is very close to laughing.
This is something that is taught in more dubious film schooling.
That's why they do it.
And, of course, the result is dubious.
I think why she smiles when she's supposed to be grimacing is something she was taught in film school.
It's strange because her acting is otherwise adequate. But such a severe flaw in acting cannot really be overlooked or forgiven.
I liked the movie quite a bit while I was watching it. To me, the main story thread was a little new and different. For me it was pretty engaging.
But in the end it's just an average movie. I can see why it's rate so low here, with her strangely flawed acting.
But for me, even with the flawed acting from the lead, I'll still give it a 6 because it does portray it's main theme/story thread in a good and relatively compelling way.
In this movie, everything is building to the final reveal. But this film does lack teeth. It's ultimately pretty tame.
This movie also has what I call a "modern horror feel".
What I mean by that is slick, simple and streamlined. A very simple concept and a very straightforward execution.
An example of a movie with a "modern horror feel" would be Smile.
Though I enjoyed that movie it still had that slick, simple, streamlined feel to it.
Films like The Harbinger(2022) for example, fall into this category for me.
Often films with this "modern horror feel" lack teeth. Or at least sharp teeth.
Now this movie has a sister cop interrogating and having close involvement with the main character, her sister.
This is severely unrealistic because a police officer would not be allowed to be involved in the investigation and interrogation of their own sister because of the very clear conflict of interest.
No police department is going to allow that.
In the end, this movie doesn't go too hard with the horror and that is an ultimate weakness of this film.
There is a quite interesting aspect of the final reveal but in the end it doesn't save the movie from the "decent-ish" category.
The final end is meant to shock and close with an umph but it fails and just comes across as a cop out(for me anyway)
The setting it opens with is different.
A woman in recovery wrestling with the loss of her son.
The drug/recovery aspect is portrayed with a degree of focus and relative accuracy. Something you don't see in alot of movies.
As the movie starts to kick into gear it offers a pretty compelling and engaging journey into it's central theme.
Unfortunately, this movie has a very severe problem.
The acting. The main actress has a crucial flaw in her acting.
Whenever she should have a grimace or sadness in her face she is smiling.
And it looks like a smile.
She is competent in the rest of her acting though.
But this flaw in her acting is too severe to overlook.
I think it comes from a misguided film school tip of how to portray emotion.
I will explain it like this: Alot of times we will see competent actors whose mannerisms when crying is very close to laughing.
This is something that is taught in more dubious film schooling.
That's why they do it.
And, of course, the result is dubious.
I think why she smiles when she's supposed to be grimacing is something she was taught in film school.
It's strange because her acting is otherwise adequate. But such a severe flaw in acting cannot really be overlooked or forgiven.
I liked the movie quite a bit while I was watching it. To me, the main story thread was a little new and different. For me it was pretty engaging.
But in the end it's just an average movie. I can see why it's rate so low here, with her strangely flawed acting.
But for me, even with the flawed acting from the lead, I'll still give it a 6 because it does portray it's main theme/story thread in a good and relatively compelling way.
In this movie, everything is building to the final reveal. But this film does lack teeth. It's ultimately pretty tame.
This movie also has what I call a "modern horror feel".
What I mean by that is slick, simple and streamlined. A very simple concept and a very straightforward execution.
An example of a movie with a "modern horror feel" would be Smile.
Though I enjoyed that movie it still had that slick, simple, streamlined feel to it.
Films like The Harbinger(2022) for example, fall into this category for me.
Often films with this "modern horror feel" lack teeth. Or at least sharp teeth.
Now this movie has a sister cop interrogating and having close involvement with the main character, her sister.
This is severely unrealistic because a police officer would not be allowed to be involved in the investigation and interrogation of their own sister because of the very clear conflict of interest.
No police department is going to allow that.
In the end, this movie doesn't go too hard with the horror and that is an ultimate weakness of this film.
There is a quite interesting aspect of the final reveal but in the end it doesn't save the movie from the "decent-ish" category.
The final end is meant to shock and close with an umph but it fails and just comes across as a cop out(for me anyway)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is From Black?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 383.784 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 40 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti