Due partigiani sovietici in missione per raccogliere cibo lottano contro il freddo invernale, i tedeschi occupanti e la loro stessa psiche.Due partigiani sovietici in missione per raccogliere cibo lottano contro il freddo invernale, i tedeschi occupanti e la loro stessa psiche.Due partigiani sovietici in missione per raccogliere cibo lottano contro il freddo invernale, i tedeschi occupanti e la loro stessa psiche.
- Premi
- 4 vittorie
- Boy wearing Budenovka
- (as Serezha Kanishchev)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizOfficial submission of Soviet Union for the 'Best Foreign Language Film' category of the 50th Academy Awards in 1978.
- Citazioni
Sotnikov: [Imprisoned, Sotnikov and Rybak are arguing whether to speak with Germans or not] We're soldiers. Soldiers. Don't crawl in shit. You'll never wash it off.
Rybak: So then, to the grave - to feed the worms. Right?
Sotnikov: That's not the worst that could happen. No. That's not what I'm talking about. Now I understand. I understand. The important thing is to be true to yourself.
Rybak: Fool! You're a fool, Sotnikov. You graduated from the institute for nothing. I want to live! To live! To kill those bastards! Understand? I'm the soldier. And you're a corpse. All you've got left is your stubbornness - your principles!
Sotnikov: Then go, go on living - without a conscience. It can be done.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Women Make Film: A New Road Movie Through Cinema (2018)
There is one scene, of the two partisans dragging themselves through the snow to escape a patrol, that's perhaps, for sheer physicality, the most amazing performance I've ever seen. In fact, though not episodic -- the story flows -- this is a movie of memorable scenes. There's the passing of rations amongst the partisans, the snow scenes, the ruined farm scene, the encounters in the houses, the interrogation, the "basement" scene, the "ascent". All stand out like jewels in a necklace.
For me, the religiosity isn't overt. Frankly, I don't think it would have been permitted in a Soviet film. I do see this as an existential parable about the value of life. Here is a tale where the hero -- and he is a true hero -- becomes the villain, and the weaker one becomes the stronger one. Is this a mystical process or one dictated by circumstances? There is a transfiguration, but does it come from within or without? You must see the movie to understand the issues, for they can't be discussed without giving away too much of the story. I can't say enough about the acting. It's hard for me to choose which of the leads is more affecting. I'm not familiar with Soviet film of the 70s and am not familiar with any of the actors, but they are all superb. I also note how director Larisa Shepitko uses children. They remind me of Giotto's child angels.
There is a little muddling in the end. There is apparently a prior relationship between the soldier Sotnikov and the interrogator Portnov, but this is left dangling. And the final scene is a bit ambiguous. But compared to the total experience these are quibbles. This is a movie that will mark you for life.
- jacksflicks
- 7 set 2009
- Permalink
I più visti
- How long is The Ascent?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- L'ascesa
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Mosfilm Studios, Mosca, Russia(Studio)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1