IMDb रेटिंग
6.6/10
88 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
एडमिरल किर्क की खान की जीत और जेनेसिस ग्रह का निर्माण खोखली जीत हैं। स्पॉक मर चुका है और मैककॉय से बेवजह पागलों की तरह काम लिया जा रहा है। उसके बाद स्पॉक के पिता सेरेक के आकस्मिक आगमन से एक ... सभी पढ़ेंएडमिरल किर्क की खान की जीत और जेनेसिस ग्रह का निर्माण खोखली जीत हैं। स्पॉक मर चुका है और मैककॉय से बेवजह पागलों की तरह काम लिया जा रहा है। उसके बाद स्पॉक के पिता सेरेक के आकस्मिक आगमन से एक चौंकाने वाला खुलासा होता है।एडमिरल किर्क की खान की जीत और जेनेसिस ग्रह का निर्माण खोखली जीत हैं। स्पॉक मर चुका है और मैककॉय से बेवजह पागलों की तरह काम लिया जा रहा है। उसके बाद स्पॉक के पिता सेरेक के आकस्मिक आगमन से एक चौंकाने वाला खुलासा होता है।
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 7 नामांकन
Leonard Nimoy
- Spock
- (as Frank Force)
- …
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIn the opening credits, there is a six-second-long pause between William Shatner and DeForest Kelley's names, where Leonard Nimoy's name would normally be. It's only one second between each of the other names.
- गूफ़[27:49]When Kirk checks the video logs to find the keeper of Spock's katra, the timestamp reveals that Spock melded with McCoy on stardate 8128.78. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) begins on stardate 8130.3.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटLeonard Nimoy is credited as director in the opening credits, but is not included in the cast list. There is a long gap between the names of William Shatner and DeForest Kelley, which lasts for the length of time Nimoy's name would have been displayed.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनSome network broadcasts are noticeably truncated. In particular, the scene where Kruge destroys the female mercenary for looking at the Genesis information is deleted. The scene ends instead with the two characters expressing love for each other. The scene where McCoy refers to "that green-blooded son-of-a-bitch" is also censored.
- कनेक्शनEdited from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
- साउंडट्रैकTheme From Star Trek (TV Series)
by Alexander Courage
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
It's really a fantastic Trek movie, a bit lesser mainly because it came in the shadow of Wrath of Khan, a classic of the genre.
It's also far deeper than it appears because while the Klingons are depicted as ruthless, in fact, they are absolutely justified in being terrified at the Genesis Device.
From their point of view, the Federation has developed a weapon of astonishing power that is dressed up as a terraforming device. The evidence they have is a video showing this "terraforming" device as a torpedo, and the first use of this device is the destruction of a nebula. If you were any other power in the galaxy, would you not see this as a Tsar Bomba level demonstration of force?
If North Korea developed a terraforming device that can convert a uninhabited thousand square feet of ocean into a garden, would you not be terrified? It doesn't require any known enemy to be terrifying.
Honestly, for a long time, I wished they hadn't made Kruge so apparently blood thirsty. After time I think it works perfectly. Put the shoes on the other foot and you easily have James Bond or James Kirk himself battling to defeat this weapon.
The movie itself... I think Robin Curtis does a great job but I think her lines made more sense coming out of Kirstie Alley. Curtis plays Saavik like a straight Vulcan and her judgments of David don't really make logical sense. Alley played the half Romulan thing so her emotional judgements made more sense.
It's also far deeper than it appears because while the Klingons are depicted as ruthless, in fact, they are absolutely justified in being terrified at the Genesis Device.
From their point of view, the Federation has developed a weapon of astonishing power that is dressed up as a terraforming device. The evidence they have is a video showing this "terraforming" device as a torpedo, and the first use of this device is the destruction of a nebula. If you were any other power in the galaxy, would you not see this as a Tsar Bomba level demonstration of force?
If North Korea developed a terraforming device that can convert a uninhabited thousand square feet of ocean into a garden, would you not be terrified? It doesn't require any known enemy to be terrifying.
Honestly, for a long time, I wished they hadn't made Kruge so apparently blood thirsty. After time I think it works perfectly. Put the shoes on the other foot and you easily have James Bond or James Kirk himself battling to defeat this weapon.
The movie itself... I think Robin Curtis does a great job but I think her lines made more sense coming out of Kirstie Alley. Curtis plays Saavik like a straight Vulcan and her judgments of David don't really make logical sense. Alley played the half Romulan thing so her emotional judgements made more sense.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Star Trek III: The Search for Spock?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- स्टार ट्रेक ३: स्पॉक के लिए खोजेन
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Occidental College - 1600 Campus Road, Eagle Rock, लॉस एंजेल्स, कैलिफोर्निया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(near the end, stairs and fountain on planet Vulcan)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,70,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $7,64,71,046
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,66,73,295
- 3 जून 1984
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $7,65,51,989
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 45 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
टॉप गैप
By what name was Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984) officially released in India in English?
जवाब