NOTE IMDb
2,6/10
28 k
MA NOTE
Des scientifiques gardent en captivité des bébés super intelligents qui parlent. Les choses empirent quand un bébé génie est remplacé par son frère jumeau.Des scientifiques gardent en captivité des bébés super intelligents qui parlent. Les choses empirent quand un bébé génie est remplacé par son frère jumeau.Des scientifiques gardent en captivité des bébés super intelligents qui parlent. Les choses empirent quand un bébé génie est remplacé par son frère jumeau.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Jacob Handy
- Duby
- (as Jacob Daniel Handy)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film is included on the film critic Roger Ebert's "Most Hated" list.
- GaffesSly declares his "disguise sucks" and discards the hat, coat, scarf and cigar, then climbs into the baby carriage. Later, when he leaves the carriage, the baby girl has his cigar and scarf.
- Crédits fousThere are flashback scenes of the friendship between the babies as the movie ends.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: The Worst Films of 1999 (2000)
- Bandes originalesA Gift of Love
Written by Brian Thomas Lambert and Stephen Singer
Performed by Randy Travis
Courtesy of Dreamworks Records
Commentaire à la une
I completely disagree with all of the comments about this movie!
A friend and I were at the video store and bought this on a whim from the budget bin... I thought it looked bad enough that it would be a good laugh to watch it and make fun of it. No one was more surprised than me to discover that it was actually decent! It's a dark comedy not at all aimed at kids... I think it will become a great cult film like "Return to Oz." Admittedly it could have done without the numerous scenes depicting someone getting kicked, punched, or whacked in the family jewels, but other than that I had no major qualms with it at all. At times I laughed out loud, and I at least don't remember being bored at any point. What astonishes me most about the reviews of this films is that everyone seems to be taking it seriously! The same people who say that the plot is ridiculous probably loved movies like "Star Wars" and "Pulp Fiction." This movie didn't claim to be based in fact, and in fairness it can't be evaluated as such. Like any fiction film, it requires some suspension of disbelief. The dialogue isn't any worse than any of the action movies it so clearly mocks, and as for the acting, well, Peter MacNichol plays himself as usual (not a bad thing!), Christopher Lloyd turns in a appropriately cartoonish performance, and I was actually pretty impressed with the toddlers' physical acting, considering their age.
So, in summary, this isn't a 10 out of 10 but it isn't bad. You won't enjoy it if you take it too seriously, and you certainly won't enjoy it if you only look for its faults (which too many people seem to be doing). I give it thumbs up!
A friend and I were at the video store and bought this on a whim from the budget bin... I thought it looked bad enough that it would be a good laugh to watch it and make fun of it. No one was more surprised than me to discover that it was actually decent! It's a dark comedy not at all aimed at kids... I think it will become a great cult film like "Return to Oz." Admittedly it could have done without the numerous scenes depicting someone getting kicked, punched, or whacked in the family jewels, but other than that I had no major qualms with it at all. At times I laughed out loud, and I at least don't remember being bored at any point. What astonishes me most about the reviews of this films is that everyone seems to be taking it seriously! The same people who say that the plot is ridiculous probably loved movies like "Star Wars" and "Pulp Fiction." This movie didn't claim to be based in fact, and in fairness it can't be evaluated as such. Like any fiction film, it requires some suspension of disbelief. The dialogue isn't any worse than any of the action movies it so clearly mocks, and as for the acting, well, Peter MacNichol plays himself as usual (not a bad thing!), Christopher Lloyd turns in a appropriately cartoonish performance, and I was actually pretty impressed with the toddlers' physical acting, considering their age.
So, in summary, this isn't a 10 out of 10 but it isn't bad. You won't enjoy it if you take it too seriously, and you certainly won't enjoy it if you only look for its faults (which too many people seem to be doing). I give it thumbs up!
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Baby Geniuses
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 12 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 27 250 736 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 5 613 587 $US
- 14 mars 1999
- Montant brut mondial
- 36 450 736 $US
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was P'tits génies (1999) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Répondre