IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,6/10
12.213
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Wenn ein Obdachloser des Mordes an einem Sachbearbeiter des Justizministeriums beschuldigt wird, wird ein Pflichtverteidiger damit beauftragt, seine Verteidigung zu verstärken.Wenn ein Obdachloser des Mordes an einem Sachbearbeiter des Justizministeriums beschuldigt wird, wird ein Pflichtverteidiger damit beauftragt, seine Verteidigung zu verstärken.Wenn ein Obdachloser des Mordes an einem Sachbearbeiter des Justizministeriums beschuldigt wird, wird ein Pflichtverteidiger damit beauftragt, seine Verteidigung zu verstärken.
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesLiam Neeson lived in a Washington, D.C. homeless shelter for two days, to prepare for his role.
- PatzerAt 1:23 into the movie, when she is checking keys against file cabinets at the Justice dept., the key won't fit into one of the file cabinets, then the key fits the very next one. This is minor but would not happen. Since the file cabinets are identical, they key would at least FIT the lock (though it wouldn't turn the lock mechanism) unless it were the correct key. For example....all Master Lock keys (of the same sort) will fit the intended item perfectly - it just won't unlock it unless the pins match.
- Zitate
Kathleen Riley: I spend all of my day with murders and rapists, and what's really crazy, I like them.
Ausgewählte Rezension
Before watching this movie I had some serious doubts about it. Not only is this a courtroom drama (and as you know the streets of Hollywood seem to be paved with this kind of scripts), it also featured Cher as one of the main actresses. I'm not really a fan of her as a singer, but seeing her as a good actress is even a lot harder. As you know, almost all pop diva's, young or old, seem to have that urge to appear in one or two movies and that almost always results in complete disasters. So why would Cher be any different...?
When a judge commits suicide and his secretary is found murdered in a river, a homeless and deaf-mute man, named Carl Anderson, is arrested for her murder, because all indirect evidence points to him. Because he can't afford a lawyer, public defender Kathleen Riley is assigned by the court as his lawyer. Even though she doesn't always believes in his innocence, she still goes after the real killer. She gets help from the congressional adviser Eddie Sanger, who is called to be on the jury panel and together they find some important evidence that the murder has something to do with corruption in some high ranks...
I must admit that Cher has done a better job than I ever expected from her. She actually was very convincing and interesting to watch as the public defender. Together with Liam Neeson she makes this movie work. Their nice performances and their difficult professional relationship in this movie are actually the best thing this movie has to offer. The story on itself certainly isn't that bad, but the plot is a bit far-fetched and gives this movie an ending that is a bit too abrupt.
In the end this is a reasonably well-done courtroom drama / thriller that lacks the required tension to be fully satisfying, but which offers some nice acting and some good direction. It's not the best movie in the genre, but it is enjoyable enough to be worth a watch. I give it a 6.5/10.
When a judge commits suicide and his secretary is found murdered in a river, a homeless and deaf-mute man, named Carl Anderson, is arrested for her murder, because all indirect evidence points to him. Because he can't afford a lawyer, public defender Kathleen Riley is assigned by the court as his lawyer. Even though she doesn't always believes in his innocence, she still goes after the real killer. She gets help from the congressional adviser Eddie Sanger, who is called to be on the jury panel and together they find some important evidence that the murder has something to do with corruption in some high ranks...
I must admit that Cher has done a better job than I ever expected from her. She actually was very convincing and interesting to watch as the public defender. Together with Liam Neeson she makes this movie work. Their nice performances and their difficult professional relationship in this movie are actually the best thing this movie has to offer. The story on itself certainly isn't that bad, but the plot is a bit far-fetched and gives this movie an ending that is a bit too abrupt.
In the end this is a reasonably well-done courtroom drama / thriller that lacks the required tension to be fully satisfying, but which offers some nice acting and some good direction. It's not the best movie in the genre, but it is enjoyable enough to be worth a watch. I give it a 6.5/10.
- philip_vanderveken
- 26. Mai 2005
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Unter Verdacht
- Drehorte
- Commercial Studios - 793 Pharmacy Avenue, Scarborough, Ontario, Kanada(originally called Magder Studios)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 14.500.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 18.782.400 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 4.152.015 $
- 25. Okt. 1987
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 18.782.400 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 1 Minute
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen